:
Vol. 5, No. 3, Fall 2011
Pages: 261-267
!" "
The influence of perceived self-efficacy on information processing
of emotional faces
:
/ / :
/ /
∗
Shafiei. H. MSc∗, Motamedi A. PhD
Abstract
:
!!
"#
"$% &'!
()
# *)(!
.
:
+,
(!
!! '
-+,
(!
'
!!
/
0
*)(! 1 2 3!( 4!
/
5
6 78
(
9
/
9:
;<
/
"
=> ?@ (#
A
BCD!
3! "#
/< !E! $( /8 F
.
=G '!
H
!
/
?(
!
"'!(
<
=G >
H
!
/
?(
=%
!
=G
H
9(
/
I
"J9!
<
/
.
:
9(
/
I
!/
0
(! ! K2(
!! K!'
/
0
"$% L7M(
()
N2
O0
&<
N('
$E
K2(
6
(!
!! K!'
L7M(
0
F9E! "$%
$E
K2(
.
!
:
9(
/
I
!/
0
! K2(
(!
! P
/
)
<
&'!
"$% L7M( 3CQ!
()
N2
0
<
.
"#
$%
:
O
"$%
()
O
&'!
< O3CQ!
OE
=>
A
3!
F
Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the effect of
perceived self-efficacy on emotional face processing. Method: Thirty students with high self-efficacy and 30 students with low self-efficacy were selected based on their scores on the Self-Efficacy Belief Questionnaire and performance on a semi-structured clinical interview. A modified pictorial version of the Modified Dot-Probe Task was conducted. Data were analyzed with a repeated-measures analysis of variance and a multiple factor analysis. Results: The results indicated that students with low self-efficacy showed significant vigilance to angry emotional faces, whereas students with high self-efficacy showed significant avoidance of angry faces.
Conclusion: The findings demonstrated that generalized self-efficacy was associated with biased information processing towards angry emotional faces.
Keywords: Self-Efficacy, Emotional Faces, Information Processing, Attentional Bias, Dot-probe task
∗
ﺳﺎﻨﺸﻧاور هوﺮﮔ
ﻲ
،
ﭘ هﺎﮕﺸﻧاد
ﻴ
ا ،ناﺮﻬﺗ ،رﻮﻧ مﺎ
ﻳ
ناﺮ
)
Self-efficacy
(
]
!
[
" # $ #
%
&
# '
$ *+,
. /0 * 1
]2
.[
4 '5
#6
7
8
%
9
6
%
6
1
+/ $
%$# : "
8
$ ;
<
.
9% %
=# <#
%>%
?$
/@" $
6/
# ABC0 $ A$5
6
D
9%8
7,
# E#
>F A G
"E# H% $ I5 A <>F +8 # :>"
]J
[
8
K
9
6
+/ >'# $
]L
[
'#
M
%N
% $
6
71
%
$ <>F
BO$
6
M P <
B
6
<
]
!QR
[
S $
'#
]
T!UV
[
#
.
CW
X
6
D
SM8 $ .0O # :>"
]
!
[
'# $
M
%N
X
6
D
#
]
2
.[
$ KY
Z
</
<CW 4$" $
%
5\
5
/ * .0O
6
P
^X
S
.0O
)
Trait anxiety
(
7$ $
_S
)
Neuroticism
] (
J
[
'#
]
!L
.[
X ` 0
6
D
#
C$ </ 7
6
$ 7 .0O
8S 7EMS#
.
X # Ha ^S %
6
K
#
%
8
#
7EMS# $ 7
#0O AEb # b>
< #
]
QR
.[
ABC0 c
7,
dS
# D
%
M% e
Ab\
+
6
4
%
#
f"
66
A
'
$
]
T
.[
+
f"
66
"
6
1
7 D
%
1
8
K
$
6
.0O K% 1
8
#
]!
.[
+@ %
> $
#
+
8
K
#
#
7
+
g' H%
$
8S %
]!
.[
"
\ 8
" h
6
g
7
% $ 8
6
71
%
B" i\
*
7
%
8 $
%
#
8
% K
]
U
.[
8 $#
7
6
9 7
6
% 9C $ ?
+8
$
K$
%
%
6
1
Bj # ' '
6
<
%
'"
e" <k
6
^S
#
]!
.[
&
l# "E#
KCd H% .k $ K 1
9#
6
8 : " "E#
41 # 'B
7
.
CW
j$
<# 7 8
7$
# ? # c
e"
6
#
SM8 =MW
" $ %
$
$
# e
%
<k
l# "
SM8 = .0O 1
$
/mM *W
]
!!!V
.[
# " #
+
A$5"
%
$ 8
S
%
" 7 '
6
Y0
#
A$5"
%
e" $ 8 n
6
D
A$5"
$ # %
6
$ 8 ?9
6
X6
' KY K
; @"
5
.
$#
7,
A$5"
%
8
& l#
%
7' A$5
.
# 8
# E B E#
o
D
S ; 7 M% $#
a" $ ;
6
7,"
CW '#
# 8
X
6
S D
7 ; p
]
!!!
.[
# q>" &
6
D
S $
6
%
)
Cognitive biases
(
/"
' A@
#
.0O 7
]
!2
.[
j$
8
Bj #
6
%8 41 7 "
7 # P
#6
)
X
6
D
(
.0O d
S
.
D
# P .0O K$
%
6
X <
%
Bj 7
6
<
)
j , ?
(
8
X K
6
%
.
#
" 7
6
g
.0O
#
$ \
K$ Z
^X
8
6
r C
+
# ' 8
Bj
6
<
%
j , ?
E#
'"
"
6
g
]
!2!J!L
.[
Y@" c
6
A G AY
# q>" 8S
6
D
$
G s
#0O AEb
.0O
]
!Q
[
7@ .0O $
]
!R
[
7,
X ` 0 <
6
D
E# ` 0 #
% .0O
#
.
&
#
; D
$
=
KY %$
9#
6
9k
.0O
5
.
8
#
$# D
M%
$# "
'"
d # ; %
% 9C
+8
X
7,
.0O $
$
M
#
$# D
'" "
%
<
.0O
#6
,
#1"
.
'
6/
>
%
@
6
X :
6
7
'" $ &0
#6
'" A
%
D+
S#
d $
6
%
# M% 79
A
i5"
8
.
d D
6
+8 D
X l#
,
#6
,
'
*k ' $
]!
.[
##
$b D
Bj #
6
<
%
X
7,
'" $
6
l# "
S 1
6
?X
S Ab\
.
H%
# OW K%$ZX
e"
6
X $ E# ` 0
6
D
?X #
% 'd Ab\
%6
1
#
.
OW K%$ZX
s
/
MY
<
.
* B
!
"#$ $ %& '()*
+
'
C 7
6
71
/6a@" ;
TU
TT
#
.
K%$ZX D
# ;$ /W <8S 41 /W $
9C#u
?$ 5 #
6S
8a"
,X
#
6
K D
" 7
S v
Iw
%$# ,X <# A =# 4$ /W
# $S 8 t
8a" A G
.k
$
8 =#
%
$
6
># 7
6
)
Median split
procedures
(
$S $ #
X $ E#
6
MY" D
6
g
.
K
# $S 7
< # $ >/\$ A G
S .k ?$X $ ? AY $ D6 j 6/
.
#
6
D
K $S
$ AEb 6# Abx, t
<# Ab\ 5 #
>Wa
6
8 # $ H^W $S 8
$S 9
9
D
.
;#u B#
S
4$ /W 8S A G
/+" %
6
S K1 y
6
41 "
.
K
t
/+" D
6
%0 y
P+"
#
t \
> *#j ' x/ <# c
^S t K%$ZX
.
h6Y@" s # " # 41
)
/
MY
(
41 />j ABC0 $
B" 6 D
2V
K
$ E#
2V
K
# D6X
j # ' 7
8S
.
;$
<6B A6G a
=# %
$ D
7, 76
%
.
5 %#
# A> K%$ZX D
:
ﺟ
لوﺪ
1
-ﺖﻴﻌﻤﺟ تﺎﻴﺻﻮﺼﺧ
ﻲﻧدﻮﻣزآ ﻲﺘﺧﺎﻨﺷ
ﺎﻫ
و ﻦﺳ سﺎﺳاﺮﺑ
ﺪﻣآرﺎﻛدﻮﺧ ناﺰﻴﻣ
ي
هوﺮﮔ داﺪﻌﺗ ﻦﺳ ﺪﻣآرﺎﻛدﻮﺧ ي ﻦﻴﮕﻧﺎﻴﻣ رﺎﻴﻌﻣ فاﺮﺤﻧا ﻦﻴﮕﻧﺎﻴﻣ رﺎﻴﻌﻣ فاﺮﺤﻧا
ﺪﻣآرﺎﻛدﻮﺧ
ي
ﻻﺎﺑ
30
13
/
15
776
/0
67
/
70
53
/4
ﺪﻣآرﺎﻛدﻮﺧ
ي
ﻦﻴﻳﺎﭘ
30
50
/
15
04
/1
60
/
46
74
/5
ﻞﻛ
60
32
/
15
93
/0
63
/
58
17
/
13
:
#
%$# K1
K t
t %$# ,X 7
7x% $
]
!T
[
5
.
# t =6Y D
8S t
R
#
.
=6Y D t D"E#
TL
D6X $
D"
R
#
.
>@ > 7
?$ 5 #
5C
# {>$
Y D
6
=
T2
/
V
#
< <
]
!U
.[
:
#
<CW K1
%
Y/
Y
6
5 $ <>F 5\ =
)
Positive Affect and
Negative Affect Scale-PANAS
(
5
.
D
Y
6
# =
S
6
Y/ B# $
B
»
5 5\
«
$
»
<>F 5\
«
W\
<
.
Y %
6
=
V
g
.
g
$ %
Y
-6
=
L
)
=
M#
6
# g
%
6
~
" $
L
=
M#
6
(
>" %
#
.
A
V
"
LV
#
.
$ 7
> $
D
Y
6
# =
?$ 5 # 7 > $ 8S j
5C
# {>$
Y $ %
6
=
# ## $ 7M+
TR
/
V
?S
<
]
2V
.[
!" #$%&
'" ()
*+& ,
:
/+"
6
`bG y
A
a" .$X
)
Modified Dot-Probe task-
Pictorial Version
] (
2
[
`bG kM
/+"
6
/G y
: " t <
7x% $
]
2!
[
S _
.
D
/+"
6
y
#
`\ A/t
%
/
)
Schematic
(
'd
%
16%
,
D69
$
F
5
<
.
D
K%$ZX 8S# $a"
A G />j %
6 D 8S
#
]
222J
.[
/+" D
6
% y
% `\
/
'd
16% %
,
D69
$
F
#
'd a"
16%
<5 F
.
a" %
L
/
!
$ ; \
T
/
.
$ $a"
0Y
$
*60M t
; \ # *x
2
/
L
$
2
$
/G8 #
!
t <6>F" 0Y
_ K @5G
S
.
a" %
JV
_ #
S
!V
< < #
!V
#
0Y <6Bj $ d <
6
7 =#
/#Y"
)
Counterbalancing
(
k,
S
.
""
6
&@ _ P
# %
A$5 %
#
.
/G8 #
LV
j
6S
.
/+" s$
6
y
$
'd
%
0M
6
*+ *
<6>F" 0Y < $ d
A # K @5G
LVV
_ 6e 4%
S
A # _ 16% % 'd $a" B# /W
LV
#$ K X 6e 4%
/
)
Forward masking
(
S
.
#$ K X 8 B#
/
0Y
$a" x D6,
S
.
#
#
0Y 7 @
7,8 #
<' %6/t
$ #
6/t @5G
0Y <'
%
K$ 7 = D # $ k,
<>e : " 6e 4% - "
S
.
s 1
!VV
$ /G K
V
+" # $ D" <' K
/6
y
%
S
.
/+"
6
5 # y
,
#
#
& 6e"
$ #
# I$ *6/@" D69, $ 16% % 'd ?X
5 + 6S
.
D6X $ E# ` 0 `\ D
#
<CW $ D6# * 7
'd %
)
$
D69,
(
% $
)
# % 0Y 'd # % 0Y
'd
(
#
7$ * 7
#
.
h/ `\ D
# $
/ ; # I$ 7
<CW
%8 8 6 5 $ <>F 5\ %
"
]
2L
[
#
8S
.
D c
;$ *6/@"
!
<
.
لوﺪﺟ
2
ﺞﻳﺎﺘﻧ ﻪﺻﻼﺧ
ﺎﺑ ﺲﻧﺎﻳراو ﻞﻴﻠﺤﺗ
هزاﺪﻧا
ﺮﻴﮔ
ي
ياﺮﺑ رﺮﻜﻣ
ﺪﻣآرﺎﻛدﻮﺧ ﻞﻣاﻮﻋ
ي
ﻔﻨﻣ ﻪﻔﻃﺎﻋ ،ﺖﺒﺜﻣ ﻪﻔﻃﺎﻋ ،يﺪﻨﻳﺎﻤﻫ ،هﺮﻬﭼ ﺖﻟﺎﺣ ،
ﻲ
ﺲﻧﺎﻳراو ﻊﺒﻨﻣ تاروﺬﺠﻣ ﻦﻴﮕﻧﺎﻴﻣ يدازآ ﻪﺟرد ﺖﺒﺴﻧ F رادﺎﻨﻌﻣ ﺢﻄﺳ يهﺮﻬﭼ ﺖﻟﺎﺣ
787
/5
1
002
/0
964
/0
هﺮﻬﭼ ﺖﻟﺎﺣ
×
ﻪﻔﻃﺎﻋ
ﺖﺒﺜﻣ
300
/
51
1
019
/0
892
/0
هﺮﻬﭼ ﺖﻟﺎﺣ
×
ﻔﻨﻣ ﻪﻔﻃﺎﻋ
ﻲ
987
/
47
1
017
/0
895
/0
هﺮﻬﭼ ﺖﻟﺎﺣ
×
ﺪﻣآرﺎﻛدﻮﺧ
ي
672
/
12201
1
442
/4
040
/0
ﺎﻤﻫ
ﻳ
ﺪﻨ
ي
863
/
1417
1
469
/0
469
/0
ﺎﻤﻫ
ﻳ
ﺪﻨ
ي
×
ﺖﺒﺜﻣ ﻪﻔﻃﺎﻋ
721
/
5200
1
719
/1
195
/0
ﺎﻤﻫ
ﻳ
ﺪﻨ
ي
×
ﻔﻨﻣ ﻪﻔﻃﺎﻋ
ﻲ
975
/
570
1
189
/0
666
/0
ﺎﻤﻫ
ﻳ
ﺪﻨ
ي
×
ﺪﻣآرﺎﻛدﻮﺧ
ي
751
/
12577
1
158
/4
046
/0
هﺮﻬﭼ ﺖﻟﺎﺣ
×
ﺎﻤﻫ
ﻳ
ﺪﻨ
ي
855
/
4870
1
244
/3
077
/0
هﺮﻬﭼ ﺖﻟﺎﺣ
×
ﺎﻤﻫ
ﻳ
ﺪﻨ
ي
×
ﺖﺒﺜﻣ ﻪﻔﻃﺎﻋ
554
/
5569
1
710
/3
059
/0
هﺮﻬﭼ ﺖﻟﺎﺣ
×
ﺎﻤﻫ
ﻳ
ﺪﻨ
ي
×
ﻪﻔﻃﺎﻋ
ﻔﻨﻣ
ﻲ
747
/
61
1
041
/0
840
/0
هﺮﻬﭼ ﺖﻟﺎﺣ
×
ﺎﻤﻫ
ﻳ
ﺪﻨ
ي
×
ﺪﻣآرﺎﻛدﻮﺧ
ي
197
/
14984
1
980
/9
003
/0
$ % $ 'd <CW /G Ae 7, *6/@" D c
'd <CW /B" Ae
×
'd <CW <>F 5\
×
5 5\
%
×
% <>F 5\
×
'd <CW 5 5\
×
'd <CW %
×
%
×
<CW <>F 5\
'd
×
%
×
0 5 5\
VL
/V
=
α
B
#
.
D6%
'd <CW AbB" 7, *6/@" D c
×
)
VJV
/V
=
α
(
%
×
)
VJQ
/V
=
α
(
'd <CW
×
%
×
)
VV2
/V
=
α
(
B
#
.
1
'd <CW *B"
×
%
×
)
VV2
/V
=
p
UTV
/U
=
)
LQ
$
(
F
(
6S $ 6" <' $ # B
"
# <>M
'd
16% %
#
.
k, #
16% 'd s 7
6S 7 # <>M
6S A $ "
% # "
'd
-g h\ 16% %
K$ 7 7
%
K$ 7 16% 'd # 0Y % <CW
>@ 16% 'd # 0Y % <CW
.
6S A
7, <>F "
# ? S %
9
)
Vigilance
(
<>M ' "
'd #
. % 7, 5 A $ 16%
)
Avoidance
(
# 16% 'd ' "
]
2Q2R
.[
" 6S A
>@
'd - % #
I$ *6/@" `\ - %
/d
!
)
:
$ E#
X
D6
(
×
!
)
" 6S A
:
'd
16% %
$ D69,
(
<8S j #
.
;$
2
7, *6/@" D c
%
.
لوﺪﺟ
3
-ﻠﻣﺎﻋﺪﻨﭼ ﺲﻧﺎﻳراو ﻞﻴﻠﺤﺗ ﺞﻳﺎﺘﻧ ﻪﺻﻼﺧ
ﻲ
اﺮﺑ
ي
ﺪﻣآرﺎﻛدﻮﺧ
ي
×
ﺮﻴﮔﻮﺳ تاﺮﻤﻧ
ي
هﺮﻬﭼ ﻪﺟﻮﺗ
ﺎﻫ
ي
ﻫ
ﻴ
ﻧﺎﺠ
ﻲ
ﺲﻧﺎﻳراو ﻊﺒﻨﻣ
ﻐﺘﻣ
ﻴ
ﻪﺘﺴﺑاو ﺮ
تاروﺬﺠﻣ ﻦﻴﮕﻧﺎﻴﻣ
يدازآ ﻪﺟرد
ﺖﺒﺴﻧ
F
رادﺎﻨﻌﻣ ﺢﻄﺳ
ي
ﺪﻣآرﺎﻛدﻮﺧ
ي
ﺮﻴﮔﻮﺳ
ي
ﮕﻤﺸﺧ هﺮﻬﭼ ﻪﺟﻮﺗ
ﻴ
ﻦ
017
/
56488
1
954
/
15
000
/0
ﺮﻴﮔﻮﺳ
ي
دﺎﺷ هﺮﻬﭼ ﻪﺟﻮﺗ
267
/
395
1
070
/0
792
/0
*B" t 7, *6/@" D c
×
% 'd " 6S
6
1
# B D69,
)
VV
/
V
p<
ULJ
/
L
) =
LT
$
(
F
(
% 'd $
6
1
B *B" D
#
.
YB" 7
6>
5 # B *B" D
Y
M
%
5
7,
)
VVV
/
V
=
p
!U
/
L
)=
!U
(
t
(
K
# 7
X
6
16% 'd # <>M D
# ? S D69,
' " 9
% 7,
)
J
(+
CW
K t
# 7
% 'd # <>M E#
6
1
9,
6
7, ' " . D
%
)
U
(
c
D
/@"
6
7, *
%
!
"#$ $ %& '()*
رادﻮﻤﻧ
1
-ﮔﻮﺳ تاﺮﻤﻧ
ﻴ
ﺮ
ي
ﻪﺟﻮﺗ
)
ﻧﺎﺛ مراﺰﻫ
ﻴ
ﻪ
(
ﻫ هﺮﻬﭼ ﻪﺑ ﺖﺒﺴﻧ
ﻴ
ﻧﺎﺠ
ﻲ
ﮕﻤﺸﺧ
ﻴ
ﺪﻣآرﺎﻛدﻮﺧ هوﺮﮔ ود رد ﻦ
ي
ﺎﭘ و ﻻﺎﺑ
ﻴﻳ
ﻦ
6e" # H% # OW K%$ZX
&
?X #
16% Ab\
'd
<8S 41
.
K%$ZX 6" <' K%$ZX D c
/>j %
A G
6S $ 8S
# :>" X %
7, $ <
%
16% &@ # M% "E#
" D69, 'd
. 7 $
.
D6d
/#Y %>% 8
# ' P
<6Bj
5 6'" %
j>0 %8 D $
' M'# $ S *6'M" l#
]
!2T2U
.[
CW
D6X %
"
# ? S SZ$
9
'd # <>M ' "
M% D69, 16%
.
Ab\ # <>M 8 D6d
&@ 6k," IX $ # =MW 6M# '" # :>"
'"
)
D69, 16% 'd
(
MS ?X
;B8 ' '" # :>"
# $
7 D *6C
C# A'" # '
# 7 " Y
% >Y"
o
'" &@ D 6S ' X v#
S
]
JV
.[
7, B ABC0
# ? S X
9
<6Bj ' "
i5" '" 7 S S %
8
]
JJ!J2JJJL
[
s O D $
*+ l# "
6S
8
K$
K$ D 16% %
%
"
<CW 5W $ 1 ' KY
16% %
]
JQJR
[
$
S %8 4$"
]
JVJLJT
[
$ ;b $
# 8 b
]
J
.[
#
7, K%$ZX D c / \
D
6S 1 l# D6X
'd ?X %
%
# ? S 1 $ 16%
&@ <>M ' " 9
D69, 'd '"
.
CW
D
'd # <>M ' " . l# E#
D69,
X v# 8 $
&@ ?
%
'"
#
&@ <
i <>F $ F %
%
.
D66B" KY # " # D##
K8
9 K% $ M'#
6# $ %
$ %
]
JULVL
[
$
K%$ZX D c =#
>'# <' <5S 7 "
6S K% $ 8 +/
%
X
?
K8 >% 16% Ab\
#
7 H% + 7
%
AEb 8
16%
]
L2L!!
[
69# j ,6# " $ < C$ #
.
# K%$ZX D
K%$ZX > *6C
D #, %
8 MY <' 6
# K%$ZX %
K%$ZX
%
g # ' <$@ # D6,6X
.
',6X
K%$ZX
C $ ,6# g1W # B# %
A G "
.0O 76 $ I 6e" $ 69#
*>j %
A y6/+" 41
8S 6 .$X
.
D6%
#
8 g6B" <'
<6BO$ # K%$ZX D %
C# %
6
',6X
K% K8 6e"
6S
7 B# $ *>j %
%
S MY g% # 8
.
D
h6Y@"
#
5
A>
,%$ZX
9,
46X
41
D M 6/ 1 $ <
+," $ 9w ; +% # h6Y@"
!"
1- Bandura A. Exercise of personal agency through the self-efficacy mechanism, in Schwarzer R. (Ed.). Self-efficacy: Thought control of action, Washington: Hemisphere; 1992.
2- Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman; 1997.
3- Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191-215. 4- Karademas EC, Kafetsios K, Sideridis DG. Optimism, self-efficacy and information processing of threat and well being related stimuli. Stress Health. 2007;(23):285-94.
5- Bandura A, Locke EA. Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(1):87–99. 6- Creed PA, Muller J, Patton W. Leaving high school: The influence and consequences for psychological well-being and career-related confidence. J Adolescence. 2003;(26):295-311.
7- Lent RW, Singley D, Sheu H, Gainor KA, Brenner BR, Treistman D, Ades L. Social cognitive predictors of domain and life satisfaction: Exploring the theoretical precursors of subjective well-being. J Couns Psychol. 2005;52:429-42.
8- Kuijer RG, De Ridder D. Discrepancy in illness related goals and quality of life in chronically ill patients: The role of self-efficacy. Psychol Health. 2003;18:313-30. 9- Carver CS, Smith RG, Antoni MH, Petronis VM, Weiss S, Derhagopian RP. Optimistic personality and psychosocial well-being during treatment predict psychosocial well-being among long-term survivors of breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2005;24:508-16.
10- Giltay EJ, Geleijnse JM, Zitman FG, Hoekstra T, Schouten EG. Dispositional optimism and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a prospective cohort of elderly Dutch men and women. Arch Gen Psychiat. 2004;61:1126-35.
11- Luszczynska A, Gutiérrez-Doña B, Schwarzer R. General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. Interpers J Psychol. 2005;40: 80-9.
12- Kashdan TB, Roberts JE. Social anxiety’s impact on affect, curiosity, and social self-efficacy during a high self-focus social threat situation. Cogn Ther Res. 2004;28:119-41.
13- Barlow J, Wright C, Cullen L. A job-seeking self efficacy scale for people with physical disabilities: Preliminary development and psychometric testing. Brit J Guid Couns. 2002;30:37-53.
14- Eysenck HJ, Eysenck MW. Personality and individual differences. New York: Plenum Press; 1985. 15- Muris P. Relationships between self-efficacy and symptoms of anxiety disorders and depression in a normal adolescent sample. Pers Indiv Diff. 2002;32:337-48. 16- Kendall PC. Treating anxiety disorders in children: Results of a randomnized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994;62:100-10.
17- Lewinsohn PM, Clarke GN, Hops H, Andrews J. Cognitive-behavioural group treatment of depression in adolescents. Behav ther. 1990;21:385-401.
18- Ollendick TH, King NJ. Empirically supported treatments for children with phobic and anxiety disorders:current status. J Clin Child Psychol. 1998;27:156-67.
19- Bandura A. Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educ Psychol. 1993;28:117-48.
20- Bandura A. Self-regulation of motivation through anticipatory and self-regulatory mechanisms. In RA. Dienstbier (Ed.), perspective on motivation: Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press; 1991.
21- Pajares F. Overview of social cognitive theory and of self-efficacy. Retrieved from http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/eff.html.
22- Bandura A .Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;52:1-26.
23- Ruiz AS, Cid FV, Moleiro MA, Beltri RT. Sensitivity to punishment as a moderator of the relationship between self-efficacy and cardiovascular reactivity. Pers Indiv Diff. 2007;43:143-54.
24- Ruiz AS, Cid FV. Interactive effect of self-efficacy and incentive value on peripheral physiological reactivity before and during cognitive task performance. Psicothema. 1996;8:491-505.
25- Benight CC, Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: The role of perceived self-efficacy. Behav Res Ther. 2004;42:1129-48.
26- Matsuo N, Arai K. Relationship among social anxiousness, public consciousness, and social self-efficacy in children. Jap J Educ Psychol. 1998;46:21-30. 27- Yue X. Test anxiety and self-efficacy: Levels and relationship among secondary school students in Hong Kong. Psychol. 1996;39:193-202.
28- Sherer M, Maddux JE. The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychol Rep. 1982;51:663-71.
29- Asgharnejad T, Ahmadi M, Farzad V, Khodapanahi MK. Psychometric properties of sherer’s general self-efficacy scale. Iran J Psychol. 2006;10:262-74. [Persian[ 30- Bakhshipour A, Dejkam M. A confirmatory factor analysis of the positive and negative affect scales (PANAS). Iran J Psychol. 2006;9:351-65. [Persian] 31- Shafiee H. Construction of pictorial version of the modified dot-probe task for assessment of attentional bias. 3nd National Iranian Congress of Neuropsychology. Tehran: Tarbiat Moallem University; 2008. [Persian] 32- Macleod C, Mathews A, Tata P. Attentional bias in emotional disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 1986;95:15-20. 33- Fox E, Laster V, Russo R, Bowles RG, Pichler A, Dutton K. Facial expression of emotion: Are angry faces detected more efficiently? Cogn Emotion. 2000;14:61-92. 34- Fox E. Processing emotional facial expressions: The role of anxiety and awareness. Cogn Affec Behav Ne. 2002;(2):52-63.
35- Bower GH. Some relations between emotion and memory. In P. Ekman, & R.J. Davidson (Eds). The nature of emotion. Fundamental questions. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.
36- Macleod C, Mathews A. Anxiety and the allocation of attention to threat. Q J Exp Psychol. 1988;38(A):659-70.
37- Mogg K, Bradley BP, Hallowell N. Attentional bias to threat: Roles of trait anxiety, stressful events, and awareness. Q J Exp Psychol. 1994;47(A):841-64.
!
"#$ $ %& '()*
.
breast cancer diagnosis predict psychological adjustment three years later. Psycho Oncol. 2004;13:235-47.
40- Beck AT, Clark DA. An information processing model of anxiety: Automatic and strategic processes. Behav Res Ther. 1997;35:49-58.
41- Erblich J, Montgomery GH, Cloitre M, Valdimarsdottir HB, Bovbjerg DH. Biased cognitive processing of cancer-related information among women with family histories of breast cancer: Evidence from a cancer stroop task. Health Psychol. 2003;22:235-44. 42- Buckley TC, Blanchard EB, Neill WT. Information processing and PTSD: A review of the empirical literature. Clin Psychol Rev. 2000;20:1041-65.
43- Kindt M, Brosschot JF. Phobia-related cognitive bias for pictorial and linguistic stimuli. J Abnorm Psychol. 1997;106:644-8.
44- MacLeod CM. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychol Bull. 1991;109:163-203.
45- Williams J MG, Mathews A, MacLeod C. The emotional stroop task and psychopathology. Psychol Bull. 1996;120:3-24.
46- Beck A, Emery G, Greenberg RL. Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. New York: Basic
Books; 1985.
47- MacLeod C, Rutherford EM. Anxiety and the selective processing of emotional information: Mediating roles of awareness, trait and state variables, and personal relevance of stimulus materials. Behav ResTher. 1992;30:479-91.
48- Scheier MF, Weintraub JK, Carver CS. Coping with stress: Divergent strategies of optimists and pessimists. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51:1257-64.
49- Seligman MEP, Rashid T, Parks AC. Positive psychotherapy. Positive psychology center. University of Pennsylvania; 2006.
50- Khodarahimi S, Nnamdi P. Cognitive behavior therapy and worry reduction in an outpatient with generalized anxiety disorder. Clin Cas Stud. 2010;9:53-62. 51- Khodarahimi S. General self-efficacy and worry in an Iranian adolescents and youths samples. Educ Res. 2010;1(2):15-20.
52- Beck AT. Cognitive therapy: Past, present and future. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993; 61:194-8.
