Climate change and
economic
analysis
byFinn R. Førsund
Department of Economics
University of Oslo
*
Slides prepared for the Symposium on Energy and CO2 Emission/Policies – Global CO2 Economics
Global warming and CO
2• Svante Arrhenius
1896, Nobel prize 1903 • Studied causes of ice
ages
• Predicted correctly the change in temperature of doubling of CO2
• Predicted it would take 3000 years
Global warming threatening
human existence
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC)
– First time the human race is capable of
destroying life on earth as we know it with peaceful means
• Increased surface temperature
– Massive extinction of species – Change in weather patterns
The fundamental stock – flow
trade-off
• Haavelmo (Nobel prize 1989) (1971):
Social entropy
– Positive utility of current consumption, but negative utility of build-up of social entropy – Social entropy: index for accumulation of
pollution caused by current production and consumption
– Social entropy causes negative impacts due to various types of discomforts, and global
Haavelmo’s social entropy model
• Social utility function
• Accumulation of social entropy
• The present value of utility
x x Z Z
u x t Z t
( ( ), ( )),
u
′
>
0,
u
′′
2<
0,
u
′
<
0,
u
′′
2<
0
tZ t
=
k N
∫
x
d
0( )
( ) ( )
τ
τ τ
t tV t
e
u x
k N s x s ds d
∞ −=
∫
( )∫
( )
[ ( ),
( ) ( ) ]
τ ρ ττ
τ
Z
• x: consumption per capita
• N: population
• k: contribution to social entropy per unit of production/
consumption • Z: index for
accumulated amount
The dynamics of social entropy
Flow of pollutants, kNx t time Accumulated amount Catastrophe level
Sustainability
• Depreciation of social entropy as pollutants
– Natural processes of dilution, decaying,
chemical processes changing the nature of stocks of pollutants, carbon sinks
• Fundamental factors for unit additions
– Population, consumption- and production technology including purification, mix of consumption goods
• Sustainability
– Current additions to social entropy
• Introducing decay of social entropy
• Sustainability:
– It must be possible to obtain a steady state for social entropy
• Emissions are balanced by decay
• Technology influences
k
, maybe
α
Z t kN t x t Z t • = − ( ) ( ) ( ) α ( ) Z t kN t x t Z t • = ⇒ = ( ) 0 ( ) ( ) α ( )
Formal sustainability
The optimisation problem
• Introducing a separable utility function
• The social problem
u x t Z t( ( ), ( )) = B x t( ( )) − D Z t( ( )), B′ > 0, B′′ < 0, D′ > 0, D′′ > 0 ( ) 0 Max [ ( ( )) ( ( ))] subject to ( ) ( ) ( ) 0, rt x t o N B x t D Z t e dt Z t kNx t Z t Z α ∞ − • − = − ≥
∫
Solving the problem
• The current-value Hamiltonian
• First-order condition for the flow variable
• First-order condition for the stock variable
( ( ( ))
( ( )))
( )(
( )
( ))
H
=
N B x t
−
D Z t
+
μ
t kNx t
−
α
Z t
( ( )) ( ( )) ( ) 0 ( ) ( ) H B x t NB x t t kN t x t μ k μ ′ ∂ ′ = + = ⇒ = − ∂ ( ) ( ) ( ( )) ( ) ( ) ( ) H t r t ND Z t t r t Z tμ
•μ
μ α
μ
• ∂ ′ = − + = + + ⇒ ∂Steady state
• No change in the shadow price on social
entropy
• Steady state for social entropy
0 ( ( )) ( )( ) ( ( )) ( ) ND Z t t r ND Z t t r μ α μ α ′ = + + ⇒ ′ − = + ( ) 0 kNx t( )
α
Z t( ) Z t( ) kNx tα
= − ⇒ =The role of population growth
• Total population
N
– The steady state level of social entropy increases in N
– The constant marginal damage of social entropy in steady state increases in N
• Possible link between level of
Z
and
population growth
N t
n Z t
n
′
=
<
( )
( ( )),
0
( )
Health effects of climate change
London smog disaster 1952
• 4000 premature dead in one week • In total 12000 dead • Caused by particles, soot, SO2 from heating/cooking with coal • Air inversion • Lead to prohibition of using coal in LondonGlobal health effects
• IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (2007),
Stern Review (2007)
• Changing weather patterns
– More frequent extreme rains, hurricanes, draughts
• Spread of tropical diseases
• Death from drowning, dehydration,
malnutrition
Local health effects
• Heat waves
– Premature death among elderly and babies
• London smog equivalents
– Reduced air quality due to pollution of particles, , soot, SO2, ozone
• Loss of productivity due to ill health, costs of
prevention and hospital treatment
• Finding willingness to pay for reduced air
Solving local and global problems
jointly
• The GAINS model of IASA
– Finding purification cost synergies between purifying local air pollutants and global GHG
– Index i is region,ei1 is local air pollution, ei2 is global air pollution
1 1 2 2 1,2 ( , ) , 1,..., 0 , 1, 2 , 0 o o i i i i i i is i c c e e e e i N c s c = − − = ′ > = ′′ >
The cooperative GAINS model
1 1 2 2 1 * 1 1 min 1 1 1 * 2 2 1 min ( , ) . . , 1,.., , 1,.., , 1,.., N o o i i i i i i N ij i j j i o i i i N i i o Min c e e e e s t a e b d j R e e e i N e e e e e i N = = = − − + ≤ = ≤ ≤ = ≤ ≤ ≤ =∑
∑
∑
The optimal solution
• Necessary conditions
• Local pollutants: marginal cost equal to
weighted marginal damage
• Global pollutants: marginal costs equal for
all regions and equal to shadow price on
constraint on global pollutant
1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 ( , ) 0 1 ( , ) 0 1 R o o j ij i i i i i i i j= o o i i i i i i i c e e e e +a , i = ,.., N c e e e e + , i = ,.., N
μ γ λ σ μ γ ′ − − − − = ′ − − − − =
∑
Illustration
S(e1min) e2*<e2o e2=e2o c1’ c1’ S(e1o) c1’* e o Emissions Marginal costs e * μ1 γ1 c1’Challenges and strategies 1
• Population growth
– Resource availability, biodiversity, pollution: all problems easier to solve with fewer people
• Technological change
– New energy technologies most important; renewables, nuclear, increased efficiency in using raw materials
• Change of composition of consumption
– A change from material goods to services; culture, education, leisure
Challenges and strategies 2
• Control of population growth must be
introduced
• Vulnerability to climate change
– Sea level rise: the coastal zone, salt water intrusion→ happens in poor countries→
pressure for migration of people on a large scale
– Melting of glaziers, floods, draughts
– Health effects, pollution, urban heat waves
Challenges and strategies 3
• Developing alternative technologies to
coal-fired electricity production
– Renewables, hydropower, wind power, solar, nuclear
• Promoting efficiency of use of energy in
industry, housing and transport
• International cooperation, the next Kyoto
protocol
– Equity issues versus cost efficiency – Technology transfers, cooperation on