• No results found

Getting Ship Shape with a Flat Organizational Structure

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Getting Ship Shape with a Flat Organizational Structure"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

 

Valforma  Technology  Services  

Homepage:  http://valforma.com   Email:  [email protected]  

Getting  Ship  Shape  with  a  Flat  

Organizational  Structure  

(2)

Abstract  

 

The   debate   about   tall   versus   flat   organizational   structures   continues   unabated   in   the   industry.   Tall   organizations  help  employees  grow  at  more  regular  intervals  as  they  climb  a  seemingly  long  career  ladder.   But  many  mature  organizations,  including  some  of  the  biggest  and  oldest  corporates  in  the  world,  such  as   General   Electric,   Ford,   and   Xerox,   have   successfully   adopted,   and   profited   from,   a   flatter   organizational   structure.      

In  this  white  paper,  we  discuss  the  limitations  of  a  traditional  organizational  structure  and  make  a  case  for   adopting   a   flatter   hierarchy   for   sustained   growth.   We   also   highlight   the   downsides   of   using   improper   techniques  and  implementation  approach  to  achieve  a  flatter  hierarchy.  We  then  acquaint  you  with  the   Valforma   way   of   organizational   structuring   that   has   enabled   numerous   companies   to   become   lean   and   more  productive  while  also  ensuring  employee  satisfaction  and  engagement.  

(3)

 

Contents  

 

Abstract  ...  2  

Contents  ...  3  

How  Tall  Organizational  Structures  Fail  to  Rise  Up  ...  4  

Drawback  of  Traditional  Hierarchies  ...  4  

Growth  without  Value  Addition  ...  4  

No  Accountability  and  Responsibility  ...  4  

Slower  Decision  Making  ...  4  

Communication  Distortion  ...  5  

Organization  Structure  Optimization  ...  5  

Faster  Decision  Making;  Quicker  Communication  ...  5  

Meaningful  Horizontal  Growth;  Substantive  Vertical  Growth  ...  5  

Getting  It  Right:  The  Valforma  Way  ...  6  

About  Valforma  ...  7    

(4)

How  Tall  Organizational  

Structures  Fail  to  Rise  Up  

Tall   organizational   structures   have   been   around   in   the   corporate   world   for   several   centuries.   During   the   late   ‘70s   and   early   ‘80s,   it   was   not   uncommon   to   have   corporate   hierarchies   that   had  as  many  as  15  to  20  layers.  In  fact,  such  deep   pyramids   continue   to   exist   in   several   organizations  even  today.  The  advantage  of  a  tall   organization  chart  is  that  employees  get  a  sense   of  having  a  good  career  path  ahead  of  them.  The   structure  gives  them  faster  career  progression  as   they   move   from   one   title   to   another   in   quick   succession.   However,   over   a   period   of   time,   the   pyramid  turns  into  a  diamond,  with  the  top  layers   getting   more   heavily   loaded   with   generalist   managers.   This   eventually   becomes   counterproductive  to  organizations  as  elucidated   below:  

Drawback  of  Traditional  Hierarchies  

Growth  without  Value  Addition  

In   a   hierarchical   structure,   employees   are   often   promoted   within   a   fixed   span   of   time   to   keep   them  motivated  with  a  semblance  of  continuous   growth.   In   such   cases,   the   employee   may   be   conferred   a   new   title   without   any   significant   change   in   job   description.   For   example,   an  

 

growth   does   not   offer   any   value   addition   either   to  the  employee  or  to  the  organization.    

No  Accountability  and  Responsibility  

When  an  employee  is  promoted  without  allowing   him   time   to   develop   his   abilities,   there   is   a   possibility  of  mismatch  between  the  role  that  he   has   been   promoted   to   and   the   skill   set   he   possesses.   This   leads   to   the   “passing   the   buck”   phenomenon   where   employees   do   not   take   accountability   for   the   work   that   they   are   responsible   for.   A   supervisor   can   blame   his   immediate   senior   for   any   problems   that   are   not   redressed,   and   blame   his   subordinate   for   any   work   not   done   appropriately.   This   concept,   known  as  “management  shield”,  is  the  bane  of  a   traditional  hierarchy.    

Slower  Decision  Making  

A   tall   structure,   particularly   in   the   absence   of   clear  authority,  means  that  numerous  people  are   involved   in   the   day-­‐to-­‐day   operations.   This   decelerates  the  decision-­‐making  process,  making   it   impersonal   and   ineffective.   Consider   for   example,  your  sales  executive  who  needs  to  make   an   urgent   decision   based   on   a   sudden   market   development.   Since   the   authority   rests   with   the   center   head,   who   is   several   levels   above   her   immediate   manager,   her   request   has   to   pass  

(5)

 

Communication  Distortion  

Tall   hierarchies   often   tend   to   turn   highly   bureaucratic.   The   passage   of   communication   through   each   pyramidal   layer   of   a   tall   organizational   structure   is   akin   to   playing   the   game  of  Chinese  Whispers.  A  decision  announced   by   the   top   management   has   to   journey   a   long   way  to  reach  the  employee  who  must  implement   it.  This  might  result  in  the  communication  getting   distorted   based   on   the   interpretation   of   each   intervening   layer.   Similarly,   a   good   idea   or   feedback   from   the   grassroots,   that   has   to   travel   all   the   way   up   through   multiple   levels,   may   be   ineffective   by   the   time   it   reaches   the   executive   team.  

Organization  Structure  

Optimization  

Given   the   various   limitations   of   a   traditional   hierarchical  structure,  “delayering”  –  removing  all                    

superfluous   layers   and   developing   a   flat   organization   structure   –   as   a   strategy   for   optimizing   the   organization   structure,   is   rapidly   gaining  ground.  Delayering  the  organization  chart   to  create  a  leaner,  flatter  organization  has  several   benefits:  

Faster   Decision   Making;   Quicker  

Communication  

A   flat   organizational   structure,   means   lesser   managers   with   broader   spans   of   control;   this   gives  managers  the  authority  to  take  a  decisions   quickly   and   effectively.   A   shorter   pyramid   also   improves  two-­‐way  flow  of  information.  

Meaningful  

Horizontal  

Growth;  

Substantive  Vertical  Growth  

In   a   flat   organization,   people   spend   longer   at   each   horizontal   level.   This   gives   them   adequate   time   to   master   their   work   at   each   level.   This   eventually  grooms  people  better  for  vertical  

(6)

movements   and   ensures   that   only   seasoned   specialists,   who   are   capable   of   taking   full   accountability   for   their   decisions,   are   promoted   into  the  managerial  ranks.    

Getting   It   Right:   The  

Valforma  Way  

One   would   assume   that,   with   such   obvious   benefits,  delayering  would  be  a  popular  concept.   But  if  not  planned  well  or  implemented  with  care,   delayering  can  lead  to  the  notion  of  people  being   demoted   into   lower   ranks.   This   could   lead   to   wide-­‐spread  demotivation  among  employees  and  

completely   negate   the   potential   upside   of   the   organization  restructuring.    

While   delayering   must   be   attempted   with   great   care  and  caution,  it  is  also  important  to  note  that   delayering   is   just   one   of   the   strategies   for   optimizing   a   corporate   organizational   structure.   At   Valforma,   we   help   you   identify   the   organizational   restructuring   strategy   that   best   suits   your   company   based   on   an   extensive   diagnostic   study,   gap   analysis,   and   industry   benchmarking   exercise.   Talk   to   our   consultants,   and   together   we   can   help   you   transform   your   company  into  a  lean  and  responsive  organization.    

 

(7)

About  Valforma  

 

Valforma  is  transforming  the  way  organizations  think  about  creating  value,  unlocking  their  true  potential,   and  adopting  change  that  will  put  them  firmly  on  the  path  to  success  in  the  future.  Through  our  suite  of   complementary  services  ranging  from  management  consulting,  human  capital  management,  technical   architecture,  solution  development,  and  outsourcing-­‐as-­‐a-­‐service,  we  empower  our  customers  to  

strategize,  drive,  and  realize  transformational  change.  Valforma  is  founded  and  led  by  a  multi-­‐disciplinary   team  of  professionals  with  over  100  man-­‐years  of  experience  to  their  credit.  We’re  here  to  deliver  Value   and  drive  Transformation.  Find  out  more  about  us  at  www.valforma.com.    

References

Related documents

The growing need to capture and analyze data is also creating significant problems for organizations with 58 percent of respondents from the Caribbean citing a lack of data

(dále jen „Realprojekt“). Realprojekt nabízí profesionální přístup v oblasti pronajímání vlastního nemovitého majetku. Podnik vlastní celkem čtyři komerční

On 20 May 2015, against the background of the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (“BRRD”) and as part of an EU-wide rating action, DBRS placed the Issuer’s Senior

> Select the desired entry from the list us- ing the rotary control/push button to start route calculation.. The

The shape of the nose, the body, and external control surfaces (if used) must be scientifically designed to obtain a maximum of lift and a minimum of drag..

The bigger players, as defined by the size of their fleet and aircrafts (Philippine Airlines, Cebu Pacific, and Air Philippines) are concentrating on the major trunklines

Various polar expedition reports also held at the libraries of the Scott Polar Research Institute, Cambridge, and the Danish Polar Centre in Denmark..