ISSN Online: 2162-2485 ISSN Print: 2162-2477
DOI: 10.4236/ojpm.2018.82004 Feb. 11, 2018 32 Open Journal of Preventive Medicine
Sexually Transmitted Infections
(STIs) Knowledge Assessment of
Adults in a US South Eastern
Texas Region
Israel G. Msengi
1*, Clementine Msengi
2, Scholastique Nikuze
1, Joel Barton
11Health and Kinesiology Department, Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas, USA
2Center for Doctoral Studies in Educational Leadership, Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas, USA
Abstract
The purpose of this cross-sectional descriptive study was to assess knowledge level regarding signs and symptoms, prevention, treatment of STIs among a sample of residents from Southeastern Texas. One hundred and fifty-seven participants age 18 and over responded to the 23 questionnaire items. Ques-tionnaires were distributed to mostly public places such as hair salons, fitness centers, health centers, gas stations, apartments, and stores. Results indicated that 50.3% of participants reported syphilis was not curable; while over 61% reported gonorrhea was incurable. Over 64% of respondents reported they did know the symptoms for syphilis and over 70% believed that syphilis was vac-cine preventable. The data collected from this study indicated that some resi-dents from Southeast Texas lack basic information concerning Syphilis, Go-norrhea, and Chlamydia with regard to prevention, signs and symptoms, and treatment. The cost and effort to increase educational programs and educa-tional messages appear to be justified. Implications for practice include in-creasing funding and efforts to provide more educational programs focusing on sexually transmitted disease prevention, health literary education to dispel the myths and stigma related to STIs and community wide collaboration ef-forts to increase awareness.
Keywords
Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs), Syphilis, Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, HIV/AIDS, Prevention
How to cite this paper: Msengi, I.G., Msengi, C., Nikuze, S. and Barton, J. (2018) Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) Knowledge Assessment of Adults in a US South Eastern Texas Region. Open Journal of Preventive Medicine, 8, 32-43.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpm.2018.82004
Received: December 31, 2017 Accepted: February 8, 2018 Published: February 11, 2018
Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).
DOI: 10.4236/ojpm.2018.82004 33 Open Journal of Preventive Medicine
1. Introduction
“Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) are nowadays a common group of re-portable infectious diseases in most countries particularly among ages 15 to 50 years old and in infants” (De Schryver & Meheus (1990), p. 639) [1]. Sexually transmitted infections continue to pose a growing public health concern in both high and low income countries. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), there are nearly 357 million people globally who are infected with one of the four common STIs: syphilis, chlamydia, trichomoniasis or gonorrhoea (WHO, 2016) [2].
WHO (2016) estimates that over one million individuals acquire an STI daily. Sexual contacts such as vaginal, oral, and anal are the major modes of trans-mission. A majority of infected individuals have no symptoms. Estimated new cases of curable STIs, by WHO regions, were as follows: 126 million in the Americas, 128 million in the western pacific region, 93 million in the African region, 26 million in the eastern Mediterranean region, 79 million in the sou-theastern region, and 47 million individuals in the European region (WHO, 2013) [3].
1.1. Literature Review
Many individuals and communities in the United States and other parts of the world are, in most cases, reluctant to address sexual health issues openly due to the biological and social characteristics of these diseases (Katz, 2014) [4]. STIs are public health problems that lack easy solutions because they are rooted in human behavior and fundamental societal problems (Center for Disease Con-trol and Prevention Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance [CDC], 2009) [5].
Since all individuals and communities are impacted either directly or indi-rectly through the medical cost or death toll engendered by these infections, everyone has a vested interest in prevention of STIs (Eng & Butler, 1997 [6]; Carmona-Gutierrez, Kainz, & Madeo, 2016) [7]. The challenge remains in de-ciding ways to enable individuals and communities to openly confront issues surrounding sexuality and STIs. However, STIs comprise a unique category of infectious diseases because their transmission largely depends on behavioral factors (Aral, Fenton & Lipshutz, 2013) [8].
1.2. Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) in the United States
DOI: 10.4236/ojpm.2018.82004 34 Open Journal of Preventive Medicine 27,814 cases of Syphilis (primary and secondary), and 628 cases of congenital Syphilis (CDC Fact Sheet, 2016). STIs are hidden epidemics which have a tre-mendous health and economic impact in the United States and around the world (Eng & Butler, 1997). The United States spends $16 billion in medical cost to treat STIs (CDC Fact Sheet, 2013, 2016).
In the United States, illicit drug use and sexual conduct have been strongly linked with incidences of STIs (CDC, 2015) [11]. For instance, people who inject drugs accounted for 6% of HIV infections, in 2015 (CDC Fast Facts, 2016). In 2016, syphilis increased by 17.6% from 2015, both Chlamydia and gonorrhea al-so increased by 4.7% and 17.5% respectively from 2015 to 2016 (CDC infograph, 2016) [12]. Higher incidence rates have been reported from southeastern states over other regions of the United States. In the United States, as a whole, racial disparities exist in terms of the prevalence of STI cases and infection rates. There are much higher rates of STIs among ethnic or racial minorities than among Whites (Hamilton & Morris, 2015) [13]. African Americans bear the heaviest STI burden (Bridges, 2014). The national data for gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis showed that Black Americans had a high prevalence of two of these three infections. For instance, Blacks accounted for 58.4% of all gonorrhea cases in United States, 48% of chlamydia sufferers, and 37.3% of all syphilis cases in United States (CDC, 2016) [14]. Also, gonorrhea rate of 1856.5 per 100,000 cases has been reported among African American women between the ages of 20 - 24; which is eight times higher than their White counterparts. National trends on syphilis infections show a decrease in the infection rate in recent years, although a significant disparity was shown among some groups (CDC, 2013). For example, the rate of reported primary and secondary syphilis among Black men aged 20 - 24 years was 105.0 cases per 100,000 males; 6.4 times higher than the rate among White men in the same age group (16.4 cases per 100,000 males) (CDC, 2016). Also, syphilis rate among Black women are 15 times that of White women (CDC, 2013).
DOI: 10.4236/ojpm.2018.82004 35 Open Journal of Preventive Medicine lower basic knowledge of the signs and symptoms of STIs. However, other stu-dies have shown that STI knowledge had no correlation with sexual behavior (Castora, 2005 [20]; Shoveller, Johnson, Savoy & Pietersma, 2006) [21]. The cur-rent study did not examine these correlations, but, instead, focused on partici-pants’ knowledge of STIs.
1.3. Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) in Texas
According to the CDC’s 2016 report on Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, for the three common STIs: chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis, Texas ranked 15th in the nation for chlamydia with 142,952 cases at the rate of 520.4/100,000 population. Regarding gonorrhea, Texas ranked 17 in the nation with 42,472 cases at the rate of 154.6/100,000 population. In terms of primary and secondary syphilis, Texas ranked 16th in the nation, while syphilis at all stages, Texas had 9564 cases in 2016. The infection trend indicates an increase year by year. For instance, the number of syphilis cases from previous years showed: 7057 cases in 2012, 7044 cases in 2013, 7804 in 2014, and 8250 cases in 2015. Specific areas of the state with higher Syphilis cases included Round Rock and Austin with 825 cases in 2016 compared to 478 cases in 2012. Other Metropolitan areas such as Dallas Fort Worth and Arlington showed 2661 cases in 2016 compared to 2141 cases in 2012, The Woodlands and Sugar Land reported 2817 cases in 2016 compared to 2246 in 2012, and San Antonio-New Braunfels had 1126 cases of Syphilis in 2016 compared to 983 in 2012.
In the Southeastern Texas region, particularly the Golden Triangle area, the number of syphilis cases grew from 24 in 2006 to over 300 in 2008; by 2015 the number had reached 574 cases (Beaumont Enterprise, 2009) [22]. Despite the increase in the number of syphilis cases, the emphasis for individuals with STIs to seek testing and treatment has been very low. Lichtenstein, Neal, and Brodsky (2008) [23] argued that since STIs were highly stigmatized, regardless of per-ceived seriousness, most people were reluctant to get tested. However, interven-tions can help reduce the stigma.
Following the abrupt increase in syphilis cases, health officials in Southeast Texas launched a “Stomp Out Syphilis” campaign to educate people about sy-philis and the importance of getting tested. This program was sponsored by the Texas Department of State Health Services in collaboration with officials from local Health Departments as well as other community professionals in the area. This campaign involved radio and television advertisements as well as commu-nity outreach.
2. Methodology
DOI: 10.4236/ojpm.2018.82004 36 Open Journal of Preventive Medicine The study sought to answer two questions:
1) To what extent do participants know the various kinds of STIs?
2) To what extent do participants know the cause, signs, symptoms, and treatment of STIs?
2.1. Participants
This cross-sectional study surveyed a diverse group of residents in a southeas-tern Texas region city with an estimated population of 130,000. The sample contained 157 individuals with an age range of 18 to 55 years of age, both male and female. This sample size was determined to be satisfactory in yielding sig-nificant results with a confidence level of 95% and a 7.8% margin of error. The study participants included employed, unemployed, retired, educated as well as uneducated individuals.
Due to the general nature of the topic being explored, a convenient sample (non-probability sampling) with a captive audience approach was utilized in ob-taining participants for this study (Abrams, 2010 [25]; Sedgwick, 2013) [26]. In-cluded in the sample were health professionals attending workshops, hair saloon attendants, fitness trainers, customers in gas stations and grocery stores. Study participants were gauged on their knowledge regarding STIs, signs and symp-toms, prevention, as well as treatment options.
2.2. Instrument and Data Collection
The instrument consisted of 23 questions adopted from the Sexually Transmit-ted Disease Knowledge Questionnaire [STD-KQ] (Jaworski & Carey, 2007) [27]. The instrument measures knowledge on six common sexually transmitted dis-eases such as gonorrhea, chlamydia, hepatitis B, and genital herpes, HIV/AIDS, and the human papilloma virus. The questionnaire sought answers on the STI’s cause and whether it is curable or incurable as well as other general STIs know-ledge questions. The questionnaire has been utilized in a number of studies and is deemed valid (Pereira & Carmo, 2014) [28].
After obtaining approval to conduct the study by a local University's Internal Review Board (IRB), the questionnaires were distributed to individuals in vari-ous locations including hair salons, fitness centers, health centers, gas stations, apartments, health meetings as well as workshops, and stores. Questionnaire distribution was performed by two faculty members and four health education trained students from a local university. Participants were presented with a letter which described the purpose of the survey and were asked to complete the ques-tionnaire, if they desired to do so. Participation in the study was voluntary and anonymous. No personal identification information was taken. The number of completed questionnaires totaled 157.
2.3. Data Processing and Analysis
DOI: 10.4236/ojpm.2018.82004 37 Open Journal of Preventive Medicine statistics such as percentages and frequencies, means and standard deviations which were performed in order to assess the sample characteristics. Another analytical tool that was utilized is the Crass-tabulation analysis. Cross-tabulation was also performed to generating contingency tables by displaying joint fre-quency of data values in order to compare responses from two or more categor-ical variables. Cross tabulation helped to determine the frequencies and percen-tages of a combination of variable categories and determine the relationship be-tween the study variables.
3. Results
Participants in this study were from Southeastern Texas region. The majority of the participants were between the ages of 18 - 55 (66.9%). Forty-six percent were African American, 32.2% Caucasian, 9.9% Latino, and others (11.9%). Females represented the largest group of participants (83.2%). Sixty-seven percent (n = 103) of the participants were employed. The majority of participants had either a high school diploma (34.2%) or four-year college degree (29.6%). Fifty-eight percent of the participants (n = 90) reported they received medical exams at least once a year, while 19% had physical exams twice per year and 15% had exams only once in three years.
3.1. Knowledge about STIs
Participants were asked to identify from a list of infectious diseases in the ques-tionnaire whether they were in the category of STIs or not. Over 90% of respon-dents were able to correctly identified pneumonia, lupus, pertussis and diabetes as not belonging in the group of STIs (see Figure 1).
3.2. Knowledge about STIs Treatment
Interesting results were observed with regard to three specific knowledge level questions concerning the treatment of chlamydia, syphilis, and gonorrhea. Half of the participants (50.3%) considered syphilis to be incurable. Yet still a little over 40% reported chlamydia and 38% reported gonorrhea as incurable STIs. In addition, 27% of participants believed genital wart was curable (see Figure 2).
A cross tabulation was performed in order to examine whether ethnicity or education level variables had an impact on these findings. Two demographic va-riables, ethnicity and education levels, had to be recoded in order to combine some categories with fewer respondents to allow cross tabulation to be per-formed. For example, Ethnicity with six categories was recoded into Race to generate two groups (Non-White = 1, White = 2) and Education with five re-sponse categories was recoded into education level which generated two groups: those with less than a four-year degree and those with a four-year degree or a graduate degree.
DOI: 10.4236/ojpm.2018.82004 38 Open Journal of Preventive Medicine Figure 1. Knowledge percentage responses for sexually transmitted infections (N = 157).
Figure 2. Knowledge percentage Responses for curable or non-curable sexually transmit-ted infections (N = 157).
curable while a little over a half (56.3%) reported gonorrhea was curable. In terms of education level, the majority of participants had less than a four-year degree (n = 98 vs. 54). Nearly half of the participants with less than a four-year degree (52%) reported syphilis was not curable, while 40% indicated gonorrhea was not curable.
3.3. Knowledge about Prevention, Signs and Symptoms and
Transmission
Participants were asked about general knowledge questions regarding STIs pre-vention, signs and symptoms as well as mode of transmission. Table 1 presents frequencies and percentages of responses for each question item.
Table 1 shows responses on knowledge questions about the signs and symp-toms of STIs, and how they are transmitted and prevented. A majority of
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 83.3 8.9 7 80.3 85.4 17.8
79.6 87.9 88.5
14 16.7
91.1 93
19.7 14.6
82.2
20.4 12.1 11.5
86
Kno
wl
edg
e
Sexually Transmitted Infections
DOI: 10.4236/ojpm.2018.82004 39 Open Journal of Preventive Medicine Table 1. Knowledge question responses-percentage of correct answers picked (N = 157).
Item True False
n % n %
STI with greatest increase in S.E. Texas (syphilis) 123 83.1 34 16.9
False statement about STIs (trans. No sympts) 102 69.4 55 30.2
Long-term effects of untreated syphilis (dementia) 104 71.2 53 28.8 Riskiest sexual activity to cause HIV (vaginal or anal) 131 89.1 26 10.9 Common contraction ways (needles, intercourse, etc) 136 89.3 21 10.7
*Chlamydia symptoms (generalized rash) 77 49.0 80 50.9
STIs contracted on toilet sit (None) 100 71.9 39 28.1
*STI linked to Cervical Cancer (HPV infection) 22 15.7 135 84.3 *Characteristics of Primary syphilis (lesion at
infect. site) 44 35.2 113 64.8
*Characteristics of Secondary Syphilis (rash on palm) 47 29.9 110 70.1
Vaccine preventable STIs (HPV) 112 71.3 45 28.7
Sexually active person (protect, comm., receive
treatment) 126 81.8 28 18.2
Best way to avoid STIs (Use condoms or abstain) 131 86.8 20 13.3 Note: Words in brackets denotes correct answer picked for the questions.
respondents did not know the symptoms for syphilis, including the lesion at the site where the organism enters the body (64.8%). Over half of the participants (70.1%) reported they did not know the rash on the palm of the hand was a sec-ondary stage syphilis symptom. Nearly 15% of participants believed syphilis was vaccine-preventable. Even though a generalized rash is a symptom of syphilis, 50.9% reported that it was one of the symptoms of chlamydia.
4. Discussion
DOI: 10.4236/ojpm.2018.82004 40 Open Journal of Preventive Medicine women found participants’ knowledge about chlamydia was limited despite ad-vancements in technology and information-sharing prevalent in today’s world. However, Nsuami, Sanders and Taylor (2010) argue that it has not been deter-mined conclusively whether greater knowledge of sexually transmitted infections is associated with lower rates of STIs [32]. This assertion is supported by a study that was conducted among long-distance truck drivers in Peru. This study found that despite a majority of participants being aware of STIs such as HIV/AIDS, only a few recognized STIs symptoms. The study also found that the prevalence of STIs among truck drivers was not different from that of the general public (Garcia, Fazio, Bayer, et al., 2017) [33].
Although findings of this study may not be generalizable to the entire Sou-theastern Texas population, these findings suggest existing lack of knowledge about STIs regardless of the availability of information concerning preventive measures.
It can be argued that higher knowledge on STIs can play a role in enhancing healthy practices and protective sexual communication. Assessing the associa-tion between knowledge about STIs and sexual behaviors and STIs protecassocia-tion such as use of condoms, Burazeri, Roshi, and Tavanxhi (2004) found an overall association of knowledge about STIs with consistent condom use [34]. In addi-tion, results from the current study showed that STI knowledge can impact the type and amount of sexually protective behaviors demonstrated, such as testing for STIs.
5. Conclusion
Given the findings of this study, the researchers concluded that the cost and ef-fort of increased educational and intervention programs are justified and, there-fore, should be encouraged, supported and expanded where possible.
6. Limitations
This study had the following limitations:
1) The sample composed of 83% of women due to convenient sampling ap-proach.
2) Results of this study may not represent the knowledge level of the general population of Southeast Texas. Therefore, findings may not be generalizable to the entire region or state.
7. Implications for Practice
Based on the results of this study, the following recommendations and implica-tions are offered:
DOI: 10.4236/ojpm.2018.82004 41 Open Journal of Preventive Medicine 2) Health leaders should advocate for comprehensive health literacy in order to dispel myths and stigmas related to STIs.
3) Community leaders in schools, faith-based groups, businesses, and other entities engaged in community health efforts should work in collaboration with health leaders to provide more education on the severity, prevention, and treat-ment of STIs.
8. Recommendations for Future Studies
Based on the results of this research, the following recommendations for future studies were made:
1) Investigate the impact of socio-cultural, environmental, and economic fac-tors of sexual behaviors.
2) Explore the best communication tools, which can be used to disseminate the knowledge needed to most individuals regardless of social-demographic fac-tors, such as age, race, income, educational level, and others.
3) Assess knowledge gap among populations similar to the nation’s hardest hit and most vulnerable groups such as those aged 15 to 24 years who comprise the majority of chlamydia and gonorrhea infections nationally. Future studies should also target gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men; the lite-rature indicates that these populations face the highest rates of syphilis and HIV co-infection.
4) Additionally, risk factors among women of reproductive age should be as-sessed. Recent Syphilis data suggest that pregnant women are experiencing se-vere disparities and sese-vere consequences from untreated STDs, particularly with the recent increase in congenital syphilis.
5) Additional research looking at the factors contributing to knowledge of the STIs in South East Texas is recommended, preferably a quantitative study using random sampling.
References
[1] De Schryver, A. and Meheus, A. (1990) Epidemiology of Sexually Transmitted Dis-eases: The Global Picture. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 68, 639-654. [2] World Health Organization (WHO) (2016) Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs).
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs110/en/
[3] World Health Organization (2013) Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) The Im-portance of a Renewed Commitment to STI Prevention and Control in Achieving Global Sexual and Reproductive Health.
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/82207/1/WHO_RHR_13.02_eng.pdf [4] Katz, A.R. (2014) Insights in Public Health: The Hidden Epidemic: Sexually
Trans-mitted Diseases in 2014. Hawai’i Journal of Medicine & Public Health, 73, 265-267. [5] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2009) Trends in Sexually Transmitted Diseases in the United States: 2009 National Data for Gonorrhoea, Chlamydia and Syphilis.http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats09/trends2009.pdf
DOI: 10.4236/ojpm.2018.82004 42 Open Journal of Preventive Medicine Control of Sexually Transmitted Diseases. National Academic Press, Washington DC. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK232933/
[7] Carmona-Gutierrez, D., Kainz, K. and Madeo, F. (2016) Sexually Transmitted In-fections: Old Foes on the Rise. Microbial Cell, 3, 361-362.
https://doi.org/10.15698/mic2016.09.522
[8] Aral, S.O., Fenton, K.A. and Lipshutz, J.A. (2013) The New Public Health and STD/HIV Prevention: Personal, Public and Health and STD/HIV Prevention: Per-sonal, Public and Health Systems Approaches. Springer Science and Business Me-dia, New York.
[9] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013) Fact Sheet: Reported STDs in the United States 2013 National Data for Chlamydia, Gonorrhoea, and Syphilis. http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/std-trends-508.pdf
[10] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2016) Fact Sheet: Reported STDs in the United States, 2016. High Burden of STDs Threaten Millions of Americans. https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/factsheets/std-trends-508.pdf [11] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2015) Persons Who Use Drugs
(PWUD). http://www.cdc.gov/pwud/
[12] CDC Infograph (2016) Sexually Transmitted Diseases Surveillance https://www.cdc.gov/std/stats16/infographic.htm
[13] Hamilton, D.T. and Morris, M. (2015) The Racial Disparities in STI in the US: Concurrency, STI Prevalence, and Heterogeneity in Partner Selection. Epidemics, 11, 56-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2015.02.003
[14] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2016) CDC Fact Sheet: Incidences, Prevalence and Cost of Sexually Transmitted Infections in the United States. https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/factsheets/STI-Incidence-Prevalence -Cost-Fact-Sheet-508.pdf
[15] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013) Incidence, Prevalence, and Cost of Sexually Transmitted Infections in the United States.
http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats/STI-Estimates-Fact-Sheet-Feb-2013.pdf
[16] Santelli, J.S., Lowry, R., Brener, N.D. and Robin, L. (2000) The Association of Sexual Behaviors with Socioeconomic Status, Family Structure, and Race/Ethnicity among US Adolescents. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1582-1588.
https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.90.10.1582
[17] Bridges, E. (2014) Young People and Sexually Transmitted Infections.
http://www.advocatesforyouth.org/publications/publications-a-z/2301-young-peopl e-and-sexually-transmitted-infections
[18] Malta, M., Bastos, F.I., Strathdee, S.A., Cunnigham, S.D., Pilotto, J.H. and Kerrigan, D. (2007) Knowledge, Perceived Stigma, and Care-Seeking Experiences for Sexually Transmitted Infections: A Qualitative Study from the Perspective of Public Clinic Attendees in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. BMC Public Health, 7, 18.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-18
[19] Ferguson, H., et al. (2002) Sexually Transmitted Infections: Perceived Knowledge versus Actual Knowledge.
https://augusta.openrepository.com/augusta/bitstream/10675.2/610838/1/Ferguson _2006_1_1.pdf
DOI: 10.4236/ojpm.2018.82004 43 Open Journal of Preventive Medicine [21] Shoveller, J.A., Johnson, J.L., Savoy, D.M. and Pietersma, W.A.W. (2006) Prevent-ing Sexually Transmitted Infections among Adolescents: An Assessment of Ecolog-ical Approaches and Study Methods. SexEducation, 6, 163-183.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14681810600578859
[22] Beaumont Enterprise (2009) Jefferson County Syphilis Cases on Record Pace. http://www.beaumontenterprise.com/news/article/Jefferson-County-syphilis-cases-on-record-pace-742111.php
[23] Lichtenstein, B., Neal, T.M. and Brodsky, S.L. (2008) The Stigma of Sexually Transmitted Infections: Knowledge, Attitudes, and an Educationally-Based Inter-vention. The Health Education Monographs Serious,25, 28-33.
[24] Du, P., Thomas, R., McNutt, L. and Coles, F.B. (2008) Comparability on Know-ledge, Attitudes, and Behaviours between STD Clinic Clients and High-Risk Indi-viduals in Community. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 14, 454-463.https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PHH.0000333880.63195.e4
[25] Abrams, L.S. (2010) Sampling “Hard to Reach” Populations in Qualitative Research: The Case of Incarcerated Youth. Qualitative Social Work, 2010, 536.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325010367821
[26] Sedgwick, P. (2013) Convenience Sampling. British Medical Journal, 2013, 347.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f6304
[27] Jaworski, B.C. and Carey, M.P. (2007) Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Self-Administered Questionnaire to Measure Knowledge of Sexually Transmit-ted Diseases. AIDS and Behavior, 11, 557-574.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-006-9168-5
[28] Pereira H. and Carmo, A. (2014) Sexually Transmitted Diseases: Knowledge and Perceived Prevalence of Symptoms in University Students.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272755729_Sexually_Transmitted_Diseas es_Knowledge_and_Perceived_Prevalence_of_Symptoms_in_University_Students [29] Taylor, M., Jinabhai, C., Sathiparsad, H. and de Vries, H. (2014) South African High
School Students’ Health Literacy and Behaviour Concerning HIV/AIDS, STIs, and TB (HAST). International Journal of Infectious Diseases,21,247.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2014.03.934
[30] Anderson-Ellstrom, A. and Milsom, I. (2002) Knowledge about the Prevention of Sexually Transmitted Diseases: A Longitudinal Study of Young Women from 16-23 Years of Age. Sexually Transmitted Infections,78, 339-341.
https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.78.5.339
[31] Lorimer, K. and Hart, G.J. (2010) Knowledge of Chlamydia trachomatis among Men and Women Approached to Participate in Community-Based Screening, Scot-land, UK. BMC Public Health, 10, 794-802.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-794
[32] Nsuami, M.J., Sanders, L.S. and Taylor, S.N. (2010) Knowledge of Sexually Trans-mitted Infections among High School Students. American Journal of Health Educa-tion,41, 206-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2010.10599147
[33] García, P.J., Fazio, I.B., Bayer, A.M., Lizarraga, A.G., Chiappe, M., La Rosa, S., Lazo, M., López, L., Valderrama, M. and Cárcamo, C.P. (2017) Sexual Health Knowledge and Practices and STI/HIV Prevalence among Long-Distance Truck Drivers in Pe-ru.SAGE Open Medicine, 5, 1-6.https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117746308 [34] Burazeri, G., Roshi, E. and Tavanxhi, N. (2004) Does Knowledge about Sexually
