• No results found

Schools Using EPM as their Payroll Provider

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Schools Using EPM as their Payroll Provider"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Schools Using EPM as their Payroll Provider

We strongly recommend that schools using EPM as their payroll provider manage their payroll costs using the Payroll Control Ledger Code. This is because EPM deducts the various pay elements from the School’s Bank Account at the time they need to pass on these costs:

- ‘total due to employees’ (salaries) on pay day, at the end of the month - ‘pensions’ possibly the same day, but more likely early in the following

month

- ‘Inland Revenue’ payment later in the following month, and - ‘3rd Party’ payments also later in the following month … or later The use of Payroll Control makes it easier to deal with these timing

differences, as we charge the costs to the relevant ledger code in the month in which they are due, and then place each element to the Bank on FMS6, as the bank account is debited.

Payroll Control sits on the Balance Sheet (within the BCR) as a liability, showing that the school owes some money but has not yet disbursed it. Process:

1. On receipt of the final EPM reports, process a Normal Journal to debit each ledger code (e.g. Teachers’ Pay) with the total (final column figure) for that ledger code.

Extract from EPM report:

A Black 2456.50 B Brown 1288.36 C Grey 3602.90 D Umber 2397.10 R White 1599.20 01001100 11344.06

Ledger code for teachers’ pay Total debit for journal

(2)

2. When the Bank Statement is received, showing a BACS payment, compare this figure with the totals at the bottom of the Costings Report. You should refer to the EPM Summary Report, to identify whether the payment relates to employees pay, pensions, IR or any third party payments.

You will also need the EPM 3rd Parties report, as this will confirm whether all 3rd party payments are being made via BACS (so will automatically be taken from the School's Bank Account), or whether any are to be 'paid by cheque' (so will need a manual journal to remove the amount from Payroll Control). See below: Possible reasons for differences.

Extract: Gross

Pay Taxable Pay Tax Paid NI NI Pension Pension 3 rd party

Deductions Net Pay 20953.47 19533.56 2926.73 1223.67 1185.67 2718.91 1172.74 239.32 15384.01 Total Cost of Payroll 24357.02 (20953.47-0.00+1223.67+2718.91-539.03-0.00-0.00)

Total Due to Inland Revenue 4842.04 (2926.73+1185.67+1223.67+45.00-0.00-539.03-0.00)

Total Due to Employees 15384.01 (15384.01)

Total Due to Pensions 3891.65 (1172.74-2718.91)

Total Due to Third Parties 239.32 (24357.02-4842.04-15384.01-3891.65)

(3)

At the end of each month, after completing the Month End reports, the balance on the BCR for the Payroll Control ledger code should be reconciled to the EPM Summary Sheets; the balance will be the total of the elements which have not yet appeared on the Bank Statements, e.g. usually the Pension, National Insurance & 3rd Party payments elements for the month being reported.

Summary of Process:

Normal Journal using figures on EPM Payroll Summary Report: Debit various employee ledger codes + Credit Payroll Control

When figures appear on Bank Statement, check to EPM Summary Sheets: 4 separate Cash Book Journals to Debit Payroll Control:

1 for ‘total due to employees’ 1 for ‘total due to Inland Revenue 1 for ‘total due to pensions’

(4)

In this example, the balance on Payroll Control after completing the Period End Return should be £8973.01 (i.e. total due to IR £4842.04 + total due to Pensions £3891.65 + Total due to 3rd Parties £239.32).

It is good practice to make a note of the outstanding pay elements, including the amounts, on the monthly BCR Balance Sheet page, as confirmation of that Payroll Control has been reconciled.

Any differences should be investigated and adjustments made as appropriate. Possible reasons for differences:

1. 3RD Party Payments are not always made via BACS. Sometimes part of this is paid by cheque. The supporting EPM sheets will detail the method of payment.

Extract from EPM 3rd Parties Report:

Code Description Amount Employer

Amount Total Amount by BACS Amount by Cheque

ACE Ace Insurance 3.80 0.00 3.80 3.80 0.00

CHILD Child Care Vouchers 227.17 0.00 227.17 0.00 227.17

GMB SUB GMB Sub 5.55 0.00 5.55 5.55 0.00

GTC1 GTC Fee Deduction 3.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 0.00

Total 239.52 0.00 239.52 12.35 227.17

(5)

3. Childcare Voucher Services (CVS). The amount of any CVS payment will need to be cleared each month from Payroll Control, using a normal journal to debit PC and credit the amount to Workplace Nursery Fees (63086041-01). In any case where the amount debited directly to the Bank is not the same as the 3rd party figure on the EPM report, a normal journal will be needed to adjust (debit) Payroll Control. The other line of the journal will depend

on each situation.

References

Related documents

Automotive component and precision machining sales increased by HUF 130 million, or 3.6%, comparing to the same period of 2003, while agricultural and general machinery sales

The optimization goal is to compute routes (starting at the depot, visiting the locations and finishing at the depot) for all the vehicles in the given time horizon, which minimize

Venkatraman, Clithero, Fitzsimons, & Huettel (2011) identify six different ways in which Neuroscience can help to improve the prediction of consumers’ choises: Testing

The purpose of this phenomenological study is to interpret the stories of the greater Atikokan community and provide content in the development of Quetico Provincial Park‟s

○ If BP elevated, think primary aldosteronism, Cushing’s, renal artery stenosis, ○ If BP normal, think hypomagnesemia, severe hypoK, Bartter’s, NaHCO3,

“Well, I don’t know about you,” said Ford again after a moment, “but I’m off.”.. He sat a while

The positive and signi…cant coe¢ cient on the post shipment dummy in the fourth column implies that prices charged in post shipment term transactions are higher than those charged

Net sales for Business Area Finland, which includes the operations in the Baltic States, rose 9 percent compared with the preceding year, and amounted to SEK 461 M (424).. The