• No results found

Supplemental Material

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Supplemental Material "

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Supplemental Material

Table S1. Descriptive Characteristics of Parents from SALSA and NLDS (n=286) and Their Non-Pregnant Adult Offspring in NLDS (n=395) with Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity Information, Stratified by Parental Location of Education

Overall US-Educated

Parent

Foreign-Educated Parent

Parents N Mean (SD) or % N Mean (SD) or % N Mean (SD) or %

Covariates Age (years) 286 68.9 (7.8) 165 68.5 (8.2) 112 69.0 (7.0)

Gender 286 165 112

Male 36.4 34.6 39.3

Female 63.6 65.5 60.7

Country of Birth 286 165 112

United States 53.5 92.7 -

Mexico 41.6 7.3 88.4

Other 4.9 - 11.6

Location of Education 286 165 112

United States 59.6 100 -

Both/uncertain 2.9 - 7.1

Mexico 37.6 - 92.9

Socioeconomic Position

Educational Attainment (years) 286 165 112

≤ 4 24.1 7.9 48.2

5-10 34.6 33.9 33.9

11-12 17.1 24.9 6.3

13-14 12.2 16.4 6.3

≥15 11.9 17.0 5.4

Adult Children N Mean (SD) or % N Mean (SD) or % N Mean (SD) or %

Covariates Age (years) 392 53.1 (11.8) 239 53.8 (11.8) 145 51.6 (11.4)

Gender 395 239 145

Male 37.0 34.7 41.4

(2)

Female 63.0 65.3 58.6

Country of Birth 395 239 145

United States 76.0 96.2 46.9

Mexico 21.3 3.8 46.2

Other 2.8 - 6.9

Location of Education 395 239 145

United States 80.3 97.1 55.6

Both/uncertain 9.7 2.9 20.4

Mexico 10.0 - 23.9

Socioeconomic Position

Educational Attainment (years) 395 239 145

≤ 4 2.0 0.8 4.1

5-10 9.9 3.8 17.9

11-12 21.8 24.7 17.9

13-14 28.6 30.5 25.5

≥15 37.7 40.2 34.5

Intergenerational Educational

Mobility

395 239 145

Stable High 26.8 26.4 26.2

Upwardly Mobile 16.7 15.9 19.3

Downwardly Mobile 27.6 27.2 27.6

Stable Low 28.9 30.5 26.9

Health Outcome Metabolic Syndrome 395 239 145

MetS

*

51.1 50.6 51.0

Abdominally Obese and 0-1

Elevated Subcomponents 32.4

36.4

25.5

Not Abdominally Obese 16.5 13.0 22.8

Obesity (BMI ≥ 30) 395 239 145

Obese 51.7 52.7 51.0

Not Obese 48.4 47.3 49.0

(3)

*

MetS, metabolic syndrome, defined by the IDF as having abdominal obesity and at least two elevated subcomponents

Elevated per the IDF definition of MetS

(4)

Table S2. Distribution of Elevated Subcomponents by Obesity Measure for Parents and Adult Offspring

*

Waist circumference ≥ 80 cm for women or ≥ 94 cm for men

Body Mass Index ≥ 30 kg/m

2

At least two elevated subcomponents required for classification of metabolic syndrome

§

Measure of obesity used in analysis; obesity (BMI ≥ 30) used if no waist circumference measurement available.

Number of Elevated Subcomponents of Metabolic Syndrome

0 1 2

3 4

Parents N = 271

N = 216 Abdominally Obese

*

6.27 25.46 32.84 14.39 0.74 N = 55 Not Abdominally Obese 2.21 10.74 5.54 1.85 0 Parents

N = 267

N = 117 Obese

2.25 16.85 16.48 7.49 0.75

N = 150 Not Obese 6.37 19.48 21.35 8.99 0

Parents N = 271

N = 216 Obese, Measure Used

§

6.27 25.46 32.84 14.39 0.74 N = 55 No Obese, Measure Used 2.21 10.74 5.54 1.85 0 Adult

Offspring N = 346

N = 298 Abdominally Obese

*

11.27 20.52 23.41 19.08 11.85 N = 48

Not Abdominally Obese 6.36 3.47 1.73 1.45 0.87 Adult

Offspring N = 362

N = 189 Obese

3.04 9.39 16.57 13.26 9.94

N = 173

Not Obese 14.09 15.19 8.29 7.46 2.76 Adult

Offspring N = 362

N = 308 Obese, Measure Used 10.77 20.44 22.93 19.06 11.88 N = 54

Not Obese, Measure Used 6.35 4.14 1.93 1.66 0.83

(5)

Table S3. Percent Change Compared to the Stable Low Referent and 95% Confidence Intervals for Quantitative Measures of Metabolic Syndrome Subcomponents by

Intergenerational Educational Mobility Category and Sex

Intergenerational Educational Attainment MetS

Subcomponents

Stable High Upwardly Mobile Downwardly Mobile Model 1

*

BMI -8.38 (-13.62, -2.81) -8.01 (-14.28, -1.28) -2.25 (-8.14, 4.00) Female -11.49 (-17.24, -5.32) -10.74 (-18.78, -1.89) -4.31 (-11.48, 3.43)

Male -5.44 (-12.98, 2.76) -5.58 (-14.66, 4.46) 0.14 (-8.40, 9.47) WC

-6.52 (-10.34, -2.52) -6.23 (-11.17, -1.00) -1.05 (-5.18, 3.26) Female -8.46 (-13.06, -3.62) -9.93 (-16.38, -2.98) -1.90 (-7.03, 3.52) Male -4.25 (-9.77, 1.62) -1.99 (-8.52, 5.01) 0.18 (-6.21, 7.00) SBP -5.29 (-8.82, -1.64) -5.17 (-9.09, -1.09) -0.56 (-4.17, 3.20) Female -4.43 (-8.86, 0.21) -5.71 (-10.65, -0.49) -0.24 (-4.74, 4.49) Male -7.13 (-13.47, -0.33) -4.26 (-11.57, 3.66) -1.12 (-7.87, 6.12) DBP -3.04 (-7.17, 1.26) -3.82 (-7.81, 0.35) 1.43 (-2.75, 5.80) Female -0.86 (-6.18, 4.76) -3.00 (-7.96, 2.21) 1.92 (-3.10, 7.19) Male -6.29 (-12.79, 0.68) -4.30 (-10.97, 2.87) 0.44 (-6.40, 7.79) HDL

5.14 (-1.64, 12.38) 9.79 (2.21, 17.93) -4.31 (-10.68, 2.51)

Female 8.31 (-0.50, 17.89) 13.36 (2.56, 25.31) -4.03 (-11.52, 4.09) Male 0.96 (-8.97, 11.99) 4.67 (-5.70, 16.17) -4.72 (-15.24, 7.43) FG -6.18 (-13.58, 1.86) -8.03 (-17.05, 1.96) 0.49 (-8.68, 10.58)

Female -2.62 (-7.91, 2.97) -3.26 (-12.13, 6.51) 7.07 (1.81, 12.59) Male -9.77 (-20.44, 2.33) -16.72 (-25.70, -6.67) -8.05 (-19.63, 5.21) TG -10.93 (-22.93, 2.95) -12.42 (-27.52, 5.83) -1.68 (-16.10, 15.25)

Female -5.11 (-19.94, 12.46) -2.71 (-23.28, 23.54) 8.51 (-9.43, 30.02) Male -22.02 (-40.69, 2.54) -17.91 (-37.71, 8.19) -12.02 (-34.35, 17.90)

Model 2

BMI -9.25 (-14.58, -3.59) -8.52 (-14.85, -1.72) -2.90 (-8.89, 3.49)

Female -11.49 (-17.24, -5.32) -10.74 (-18.78, -1.89) -4.31 (-11.48, 3.43)

(6)

Male -7.65 (-15.18, 0.54) -5.34 (-14.61, 4.92) -1.28 (-9.69, 7.91) WC

-7.13 (-11.03, -3.07) -6.67 (-11.62, -1.44) -1.75 (-5.90, 2.58) Female -8.42 (-13.16, -3.44) -10.08 (-16.58, -3.08) -1.93 (-7.23, 3.68) Male -5.99 (-11.32, -0.35) -2.41 (-8.80, 4.41) -1.29 (-7.44, 5.26) SBP -6.43 (-10.08, -2.63) -5.58 (-9.53, -1.46) -0.62 (-4.28, 3.16) Female -5.22 (-9.94, -0.25) -5.85 (-10.93, -0.48) 0.00 (-4.74, 4.98) Male -8.74 (-15.21, -1.77) -4.29 (-11.64, 3.67) -1.06 (-7.88, 6.27) DBP -4.09 (-8.30, 0.30) -4.43 (-8.38, -0.30) 1.18 (-2.94, 5.46) Female -2.07 (-7.58, 3.78) -3.63 (-8.59, 1.59) 1.51 (-3.44, 6.72) Male -2.42 (-8.56, 4.13) -0.70 (-7.65, 6.79) 0.44 (-6.40, 7.79) HDL

7.09 (0.16, 14.50) 10.89 (3.18, 19.20) -3.83 (-10.21, 2.99)

Female 8.89 (-0.31, 18.94) 13.55 (2.72, 25.5) -4.33 (-12.03, 4.03) Male 4.19 (-5.68, 15.08) 6.07 (-4.32, 17.59) -4.47 (-15.24, 7.68) FG -5.83 (-13.34, 2.34) -8.27 (-17.01, 1.38) 0.07 (-9.09, 10.16) Female -1.52 (-6.96, 4.23) -3.09 (-11.33, 5.91) 5.36 (0.51, 10.43)

Male -12.47 (-22.89, -0.65) -17.57 (-26.38, -7.72) -8.70 (-20.20, 4.45) TG -13.15 (-24.81, 0.32) -15.48 (-29.74, 1.67) -5.15 (-19.08, 11.17)

Female -5.12 (-20.51, 13.24) -4.58 (-24.02, 19.83) 6.39 (-11.88, 28.44) Male -25.71 (-42.08, -4.72) -21.24 (-39.32, 2.22) -15.37 (-36.42, 12.66)

*

Adjusted for age, age

2

, and sex

Adjusted for age, age

2

, sex, and the location of education of parents and adult children

Different clinical cut-offs are used for men and women

Percent changes and 95% CIs in bold indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05)

MetS indicates metabolic syndrome; BMI, body mass index (kg/m

2

); WC, waist circumference

(cm); SBP, systolic blood pressure (mm/Hg); DBP, diastolic blood pressure (mm/Hg); HDL,

high density lipoprotein cholesterol (mg/dL); FG, fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL); TG,

triglyerides (mg/dL).

Figure

Table S1. Descriptive Characteristics of Parents from SALSA and NLDS (n=286) and  Their Non-Pregnant Adult Offspring in NLDS (n=395) with Metabolic Syndrome and  Obesity Information, Stratified by Parental Location of Education
Table S2. Distribution of Elevated Subcomponents by Obesity Measure for Parents and  Adult Offspring

References

Related documents

The Illinois State Bar Association encourages students of all ages, and all backgrounds, to advance their interest and involvement in the law and good citizenship.. AMERICAN

RECEIVE and FILE the Department of Transportation report dated May 6, 2004, submitted pursuant to Motion (Zine - Smith) relative to implementation of a program to temporarily

protected TRUE TRUE TRUE FALSE default TRUE TRUE FALSE FALSE private TRUE FALSE FALSE

In this study, a group of working age people who par- ticipated in forest bathing were classified into two groups based on the presence or absence of depressive tendencies, to

Legislative or judicial adoption of the broker's duty to inspect re- quires a new, three-step analysis of broker liability. The analysis focuses first on the

“Having already transformed into some particular being, he takes it as no more than a waiting for the next transformation into the unknown, nothing more” (Ziporyn, p. This

(2011) concluded in the study with a sample of the fourth, sixth and eighth grade students that they have underdeveloped epistemological beliefs regarding the

Crimes were categorized under seven crime types: Property (theft, pillaging, fraud), Violent (homicide, bodily harm, deprivation of liberty, insult, maltreatment,