• No results found

FIRST AID TO APPLICANTS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "FIRST AID TO APPLICANTS"

Copied!
13
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

NORWEGIAN CANCER SOCIETY

FIRST AID TO APPLICANTS

LISE BOLLUM

TORUNN ELISABETH TJELLE KRISTIN WOLD GULDVOG

2021

Lise Bollum / Advisor Norwegian Cancer Society

(2)

Norwegian Cancer Society calls 2021

Open Call

Personalized medicine Breast Cancer

King Olav V’s Cancer Research Prize Cancer forms with low

survival rates Pioneer award

June 1st

Fall 2021

Researcher project

Researcher project

Prize

Grant call from the Norwegian Cancer Society https://kreftforeningen.no/forskning/so

k-forskningsmidler/

Pilot - innovation

Nomination fall

2021 Submission to the Norwegian Cancer Society

Cancer Prevention Researcher project March 10th

• NCS funds cancer research, about 240 MNOK per year

• Based on donations

Researcher project

(3)

Norwegian Cancer Society calls 2021

Clinical epidemiology Researcher project September 1st 2021

Collaborations

Grant call from NCU Application (ncu.nu)

TRANSCAN-3 Researcher project

Grant call from EU Sustained collaboration of national and regional programmes in cancer research |

European Commission (europa.eu) Draft deadline June

25th 2021

Local healthcare services Feb 15th/June

Researcher project 10th Grant call from DAM

https://dam.no/programmer/forskning/utlys ning/

Grand Challenges Researcher project Utlysning Grant call from CRUK

https://cancergrandchallenges.org/

April 22nd 2021

Other

(4)

Calls for today’s talk

Calls

• Open Call

• Krafttak mot kreft

• Deadline 1. June

• Only one application per project manager

Open Call 2021

• Open research and Rosa sløyfe (personalised breast cancer treatment)

• 1-8 MNOK

• Overlapping project periods with other Open Call projects not allowed – that is, ongoing Rosa sløyfe projects are OK

Krafttak mot kreft

• Brain, lung, pancreatic and oesophagus cancers

• 1-5 MNOK

• Ongoing projects OK

• PhD allowed

Open Call 130 MNOK

Personalised breast cancer treatment

26.7 MNOK

Cancer with low survival rate 20 MNOK

(5)

Call texts

Calls

• Open Call

• Krafttak mot kreft

• Deadline 1. July

• Only one application per project manager

Open Call 2021

• Open research and Rosa sløyfe (personalised breast cancer treatment)

• 1-8 MNOK

• Overlapping project periods with other Open Call projects not allowed – that is, ongoing Rosa sløyfe projects are OK

Krafttak mot kreft

• Brain, lung, pancreatic and oesophagus cancers

• 1-5 MNOK

• Ongoing projects OK

• PhD allowed

Open Call 130 MNOK

Personalised breast cancer treatment

26.7 MNOK

Cancer with low survival rate 20 MNOK

Each project manager may only submit one proposal and must therefore

decide which call is better suited to their project.

(6)

The process

Open Call/Rosa sløyfe 2021 and Krafttak mot kreft 2021

Calls

March

• Open Call

• Krafttak mot kreft

• Only one application per project manager

Applications

June

• Deadline 1. June

• Read Application guidelines!

Allocation of applications to committees

June

Based on the information under SECTION 2 the applications may be re-allocated to more suitable committees

Evaluation

June-August

Peer reviewers

• Relevance to call

• Four further evaluation criteria

• Score 1-7 User

representatives

• Assessment criteria

• Score 1-7

(7)

The process

Open Call/Rosa sløyfe 2021 and Krafttak mot kreft 2021

Peer review committee meeting August- September

• Agree on scores

• Ranked list

• Two equal scores: user representative score should be prioritised

Decision

October

Board meeting, based on ranked list

Information to

applicants

October

• Yes/no/wait list

• Comments from peer reviewers

Complaints

November

Only based on formal errors

Accept

November- December

• Contract is accepted

• Revision, if required

• Double financing must be reported

• Collaboration agreements

(8)

Applications – Some changes

✓ Indication of peer review committee

• Administrative allocation of applications to match the volume of applications to the Peer Reviewers' expertise, if required

• Multiple choice fields to match with peer reviewers

✓ Four peer review committees

• New definitions of committees

• Sub-categorisation depending on number of applications

• Improved and clarified evaluation criteria

✓ User involvement

• New assessment criteria and grading definitions

• To be described in full in the application form

Applications

• Read Application guidelines!

(9)

Read carefully before selecting and choose the committee most relevant to your proposal!

New committees

1. Understanding cancer, treatment targets

Improved understanding of cancer biology, cancer initiation, progression and metastasis. Includes research on the origin and endogenous causes of cancer. Identification and characterization of treatment targets.

2. Diagnosis, screening, prognosis and markers for treatment stratification

Discovery, development and clinical testing of cancer markers, signatures, imaging or other

methods/technologies for improved detection and diagnosis, as well as predicting the outcome or chance of recurrence, or to support treatment decision making in personalised medicine.

3. Discovery and development of treatments

Discovery and development of new or improved treatments. Includes drug delivery and development of therapies to prevent recurrence. Mechanisms of action of existing therapies. Includes preclinical research on cancer vaccines.

4. Clinical intervention and epidemiological studies, health care- and social sciences research

Clinical testing of new or improved interventions in phase I,II and III clinical trials. Epidemiological studies of incidence, morbidity, co-morbidities, long-term effects, trends in use of interventional strategies etc.

Epidemiological or social science research on exogenous causes of cancer, e.g. lifestyle factors or social determinants, as well as intervention research on cancer prevention. Patient care needs, survivorship, end of life care and health care services.

(10)

Evaluation criteria

Torunn E Tjelle / Special Advisor Norwegian Cancer Society

Evaluation

Peer reviewers

• Relevance to call

• Four further evaluation criteria

• Score 1-7 User

representatives

• Assessment criteria

• Score 1-7

See Application guidelines

(11)

Torunn E Tjelle / Special Advisor Norwegian Cancer Society

(12)

Assessment criteria for user involvement

Torunn E Tjelle / Special Advisor Norwegian Cancer Society

Evaluation

Peer reviewers

• Relevance to call

• Four further evaluation criteria

• Score 1-7 User

representatives

• Assessment criteria

• Score 1-7

See Application guidelines

(13)

User involvement in research application – Do you need help?

NEW!

Kreftforeningens brukergruppe (User group)

Purpose

• Ensure user involvement in the early stage of the research process

• Simplify user involvement by giving researchers access to experienced users.

• Increase relevance of research from "start to finish"

Process

https://kreftforeningen.no/forskning/brukermedvirkning-i-forskning/

References

Related documents

competency-based when all of the courses (for the program, for general education, for the major) have learning goals expressed as competencies approved at the program level

Staff have good insight into the anxieties and uncertainties experienced by some young people surrounding contact pre-empting possible negative effects following, however they

Este lugar está lleno de jergones muy usados para los hombres de armas, que por lo general duermen aquí, pero sino están ocupados en otras

In contrast, under the condition that the entrance date of a large number of institutional investors in the stock market is known, a Markov-switching-GARCH model may provide

The finding has supported the submissions of Ononokerrhoraye (1998) and Asiyai (2013) who pointed out that quality performance cannot be expected when tertiary

In Nigeria, for example, farmers found plant type, grain size, and resistance to diseases, color of the leaves, maturity, haulm yield, haulm quality, pod yield, grain color,

Because of the draw- backs in using the above references, standards and indices, we used the DHS maternal weight and height data to define a de facto reference for use in

Entrepreneurial Leadership Program Facilitator’s Guide Session Four: Challenges Facing Today’s Business Leaders.. Activity 4.3:. Interaction — Business Case Studies