• No results found

Glauber dynamics in the continuum: Generating functionals approach ∗

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Glauber dynamics in the continuum: Generating functionals approach ∗"

Copied!
34
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Glauber dynamics in the continuum: Generating functionals approach

Maria Jo˜ ao Oliveira

(Universidade Aberta/CMAF)

∗ Joint work with Yu. G. Kondratiev and D. L. Finkelshtein (CAOT, 2012)

(2)

Framework

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

The configuration space:

Γ := {γ ⊂ R d : |γ ∩ K| < ∞, ∀ compact K ⊂ R d } Each γ ∈ Γ is identified with a Radon measure:

Γ ∋ γ 7→ X

x∈γ

δ x (configuration)

(3)

Framework

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

The configuration space:

Γ := {γ ⊂ R d : |γ ∩ K| < ∞, ∀ compact K ⊂ R d } Each γ ∈ Γ is identified with a Radon measure:

Γ ∋ γ 7→ X

x∈γ

δ x (configuration) Interpretation:

✔ Mathematical Physics: particles

✔ Biology, Ecology: individuals of a population

✔ Economics: agents

(4)

Stochastic Dynamics

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

At each random moment of time particles randomly may...

✔ ... Appear (or born)

✔ ... Disappear (or die)

✔ ... Move (continuously or hopping)

(5)

Stochastic Dynamics

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

At each random moment of time particles randomly may...

✔ ... Appear (or born)

✔ ... Disappear (or die)

✔ ... Move (continuously or hopping) Glauber Dynamics:

(LF )(γ) := X

x∈γ

F (γ\x)−F (γ)  +z

Z

R d

e −E(x,γ) F (γ∪x)−F (γ) 

dx

(6)

Stochastic Dynamics

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

At each random moment of time particles randomly may...

✔ ... Appear (or born)

✔ ... Disappear (or die)

✔ ... Move (continuously or hopping) Glauber Dynamics:

(LF )(γ) := X

x∈γ

F (γ \x) − F (γ)  +z

Z

R d

e −E(x,γ) F (γ∪x)−F (γ) 

dx

(7)

Stochastic Dynamics

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

At each random moment of time particles randomly may...

✔ ... Appear (or born)

✔ ... Disappear (or die)

✔ ... Move (continuously or hopping) Glauber Dynamics:

(LF )(γ) := X

x∈γ

F (γ\x)−F (γ)  +z

Z

R d

e −E(x,γ) F (γ ∪x) − F (γ)  dx

where z > 0 (activity parameter), E (x, γ) = X

y∈γ

φ(x − y) ∈ [0, +∞]

(8)

Stochastic Dynamics

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

✔ Kolmogorov equation:

d

dt F t = LF t

(9)

Stochastic Dynamics

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

✔ Kolmogorov equation:

d

dt F t = LF t

✔ Fokker-Planck equation:

d

dt µ t = L µ t

 d dt

Z

Γ

F (γ) dµ t (γ) = Z

Γ

(LF )(γ)dµ t (γ)



(10)

Stochastic Dynamics

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

... An alternative approach:

Assume that for each t ≥ 0 there is a family k t (n) : (R d ) n → R + 0 , n ∈ N such that

Z

Γ

X

{x 1 ,...,x n }⊂γ

G(x 1 , . . . , x n ) dµ t (γ)

= 1 n!

Z

(R d ) n

G(x 1 , . . . , x n )k t (n) (x 1 , . . . , x n ) dx 1 . . . dx n

(11)

Stochastic Dynamics

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

... An alternative approach:

Assume that for each t ≥ 0 there is a family k t (n) : (R d ) n → R + 0 , n ∈ N such that

Z

Γ

X

{x 1 ,...,x n }⊂γ

G(x 1 , . . . , x n ) dµ t (γ)

= 1 n!

Z

(R d ) n

G(x 1 , . . . , x n )k t (n) (x 1 , . . . , x n ) dx 1 . . . dx n

(Correlation functions or n-factorial moments of µ t )

(12)

Stochastic Dynamics

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

Now take G(x 1 , . . . , x n ) = θ(x 1 ) . . . θ(x n ), n ∈ N, and sum n:

Z

Γ

X ∞ n=0

X

{x 1 ,...,x n }⊂γ

G(x 1 , . . . , x n )

| {z }

Y

x∈γ

(1 + θ(x))

t (γ)

=

X ∞ n=0

1 n!

Z

(R d ) n

k t (n) (x 1 , . . . , x n )θ(x 1 ) . . . θ(x n ) dx 1 . . . dx n

(13)

Stochastic Dynamics

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

Now take G(x 1 , . . . , x n ) = θ(x 1 ) . . . θ(x n ), n ∈ N, and sum n:

Z

Γ

X ∞ n=0

X

{x 1 ,...,x n }⊂γ

G(x 1 , . . . , x n )

| {z }

Y

x∈γ

(1 + θ(x))

t (γ)

=

X ∞ n=0

1 n!

Z

(R d ) n

k t (n) (x 1 , . . . , x n )θ(x 1 ) . . . θ(x n ) dx 1 . . . dx n Bogoliubov Generating Functional (corresponding to µ) :

B µ (θ) :=

Z

Γ

Y

x∈γ

(1 + θ(x))dµ(γ)

(14)

Analyticity

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

✔ Assume that B is an entire functional on L 1 (σ) (σ = dx)

B (θ 0 + θ) = X ∞ n=0

1

n! d n B(θ 0 ; θ)

d n B (θ 0 ; θ 1 , . . . , θ n ) := ∂ n

∂z 1 ...∂z n

B θ 0 + X n i =1

z i θ i

!

zi=0

1≤i≤n

(15)

Analyticity

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

✔ Assume that B is an entire functional on L 1 (σ) (σ = dx)

B (θ 0 + θ) = X ∞ n=0

1

n ! d n B(θ 0 ; θ)

d n B (θ 0 ; θ 1 , . . . , θ n ) := ∂ n

∂z 1 ...∂z n B θ 0 + X n i=1

z i θ i

!

zi=0

1≤i≤n

= Z

(R

d

)

n

δ n B (θ 0 ) δθ 0 (x 1 )...δθ 0 (x n )

Y n i=1

θ i (x i )dσ ⊗n (x 1 , .., x n )

(The n-th variational derivative of B at the point θ 0 )

δ n B (θ 0 ) δθ 0 (x 1 )...δθ 0 (x n )

L

((R

d

)

n

⊗n

)

≤ n!  e r

 n

sup

k

L1(σ)

≤r

|B(θ 0 + θ )|

(16)

Analyticity

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

B µ (θ) = Z

Γ

Y

x∈γ

(1 + θ(x)) dµ(γ)

Assume that B µ is entire on L 1 (σ). Then, k µ exists and for θ 0 = 0,

d n B µ0 ; θ 1 , . . . , θ n ) := ∂ n

∂z 1 ...∂z n

B µ θ 0 + X n i=1

z i θ i

!

zi=0

1≤i≤n

= Z

(R

d

)

n

δ n B µ (θ 0 ) δθ 0 (x 1 )...δθ 0 (x n )

| {z }

k

µ(n)

(x

1

,...,x

n

)

Y n i=1

θ i (x i )dσ ⊗n (x 1 , .., x n )

(17)

Stochastic Dynamics

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

Z

Γ

X

{x 1 ,...,x n }⊂γ

G(x 1 , . . . , x n ) dµ t (γ)

= 1 n!

Z

(R d ) n

G(x 1 , . . . , x n )k t (n) (x 1 , . . . , x n ) dx 1 . . . dx n

(Correlation functions or n-factorial moments of µ t )

(18)

Stochastic Dynamics

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

Summing over n:

Z

Γ

X ∞ n =0

X

{x 1 ,...,x n }⊂γ

G(x 1 , . . . , x n )

| {z }

:=(KG)(γ)

t (γ)

=

X ∞ n=0

1 n!

Z

(R d ) n

G(x 1 , . . . , x n )k t (n) (x 1 , . . . , x n ) dx 1 . . . dx n

(19)

Stochastic Dynamics

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

Summing over n:

Z

Γ

X ∞ n =0

X

{x 1 ,...,x n }⊂γ

G(x 1 , . . . , x n )

| {z }

:=(KG)(γ)

t (γ)

=

X ∞ n=0

1 n!

Z

(R d ) n

G(x 1 , . . . , x n )k t (n) (x 1 , . . . , x n ) dx 1 . . . dx n

= Z

Γ 0

G(η)k t (η) dλ(η), where

Γ 0 :=

G ∞ n=0

{γ ∈ Γ : |γ| = n}

| {z }

{x 1 ,...,x n }

, λ :=

X ∞ n=0

1

n! dx ⊗n

(20)

Stochastic Dynamics

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

Summing over n:

Z

Γ

X ∞ n =0

X

{x 1 ,...,x n }⊂γ

G(x 1 , . . . , x n )

| {z }

:=(KG)(γ)

t (γ)

=

X ∞ n=0

1 n!

Z

(R d ) n

G(x 1 , . . . , x n )k t (n) (x 1 , . . . , x n ) dx 1 . . . dx n

= Z

Γ 0

G(η)k t (η) dλ(η).

(21)

Stochastic Dynamics

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

d dt

Z

Γ

F (γ) dµ t (γ) = Z

Γ

(LF )(γ) dµ t (γ)

(22)

Stochastic Dynamics

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

d dt

Z

Γ

F (γ)

| {z }

(KG)

t (γ) = Z

Γ

(LF )(γ) dµ t (γ)

⇓ d

dt Z

Γ

(KG)(γ) dµ t (γ) = Z

Γ

(KK −1 LKG)(γ) dµ t (γ)

(23)

Stochastic Dynamics

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

d dt

Z

Γ

F (γ)

| {z }

(KG)

t (γ) = Z

Γ

(LF )(γ) dµ t (γ)

⇓ d

dt Z

Γ

(KG)(γ) dµ t (γ)

| {z }

Z

Γ 0

G(η)k t (η) λ(η)

= Z

Γ

(KK −1 LKG)(γ)dµ t (γ)

| {z }

Z

Γ 0

(K −1 LKG)(η)k t (η) λ(η)

Z

Γ

(KG)(γ) dµ t (γ) = Z

Γ 0

G(η)k t (η) λ(η)

(24)

Stochastic Dynamics

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

Consequences of d

dt Z

Γ

(KG)(γ) dµ t (γ)

| {z }

Z

Γ 0

G(η)k t (η) λ(η)

= Z

Γ

(KK −1 LKG)(γ)dµ t (γ)

| {z }

Z

Γ 0

(K −1 LKG)(η)k t (η) λ(η) For ˆ L := K −1 LK :

✔ Correlation functions ∂t k t = ˆ L k t

(25)

Stochastic Dynamics

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

Consequences of d

dt Z

Γ

(KG)(γ) dµ t (γ)

| {z }

Z

Γ 0

G(η)k t (η) λ(η)

= Z

Γ

(KK −1 LKG)(γ)dµ t (γ)

| {z }

Z

Γ 0

(K −1 LKG)(η)k t (η) λ(η) For ˆ L := K −1 LK :

✔ Correlation functions ∂t k t = ˆ L k t

✔ Bogoliubov functionals (G(η) = Q

x∈η θ(x) =: e λ (θ, η))

∂t B t (θ) = Z

Γ 0

( ˆ Le λ (θ))(η)k t (η) dλ(η) =: ( ˜ LB t )(θ)

(26)

Glauber Dynamics

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

∂t B t = ˜ LB t ( ˜ LB )(θ) =−

Z

R d

dx θ(x) δB(θ)

δθ(x) − zB((1 + θ) e −φ(x−·) − 1 

+ θ)



(27)

Glauber Dynamics

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

∂t B t = ˜ LB t ( ˜ LB )(θ) =−

Z

R d

dx θ(x) δB(θ)

δθ(x) − zB((1 + θ) e −φ(x−·) − 1 

+ θ)



Natural Banach spaces: E α , α > 0:= the space of all entire functionals B on L 1 (dx) s.t.

kBk α := sup

θ∈L 1

 |B(θ)| e α 1 kθk L1 

< ∞.

(28)

Glauber Dynamics

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

∂t B t = ˜ LB t ( ˜ LB )(θ) =−

Z

R d

dx θ(x) δB(θ)

δθ(x) − zB((1 + θ) e −φ(x−·) − 1 

+ θ)



Natural Banach spaces: E α , α > 0:= the space of all entire functionals B on L 1 (dx) s.t.

kBk α := sup

θ∈L 1

 |B(θ)| e α 1 kθk L1 

< ∞.

(29)

Gel’fand & Shilov’ 58 – Ovsjannikov’ 65

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

Scale of Banach spaces: A family of Banach spaces {B s , k · k s : 0 < s ≤ s 0 } s.t.

B s ⊆ B s , k · k s ≤ k · k s

for any pair s, s such that 0 < s < s ≤ s 0 .

(30)

Gel’fand & Shilov’ 58 – Ovsjannikov’ 65

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

Scale of Banach spaces: A family of Banach spaces {B s , k · k s : 0 < s ≤ s 0 } s.t.

B s ⊆ B s , k · k s ≤ k · k s

for any pair s, s such that 0 < s < s ≤ s 0 .

Example: {E α : 0 < α ≤ α 0 }, α 0 > 0.

(31)

General Theorem

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

On a scale of Banach spaces {B s : 0 < s ≤ s 0 } consider

du(t)

dt = F u(t), u(0) = u 0 ∈ B s

0

(1)

where, for each pair s < s, F : B s → B s is a linear mapping.

(32)

General Theorem

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

On a scale of Banach spaces {B s : 0 < s ≤ s 0 } consider

du(t)

dt = F u(t), u(0) = u 0 ∈ B s

0

(1)

where, for each pair s < s, F : B s → B s is a linear mapping.

✔ For each s ∈ (0, s 0 ) fixed, there is a constant M > 0 s.t.

kF uk s

≤ M

s ′′ − s kuk s

′′

, ∀ s ≤ s < s ′′ ≤ s 0 , ∀ u ∈ B s

′′

(M is independent of s , s ′′ and u; it might depend on s, s 0 )

(33)

General Theorem

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

On a scale of Banach spaces {B s : 0 < s ≤ s 0 } consider

du(t)

dt = F u(t), u(0) = u 0 ∈ B s

0

(1)

where, for each pair s < s, F : B s → B s is a linear mapping.

✔ For each s ∈ (0, s 0 ) fixed, there is a constant M > 0 s.t.

kF uk s

≤ M

s ′′ − s kuk s

′′

, ∀ s ≤ s < s ′′ ≤ s 0 , ∀ u ∈ B s

′′

(M is independent of s , s ′′ and u; it might depend on s, s 0 ) Theorem. For each s ∈ (0, s 0 ), there is a constant δ > 0

(δ = (eM ) −1 ) s.t. there is a unique continuously differentiable function u : [0, δ(s 0 − s)[ → B s which solves (1) in the

time-interval 0 ≤ t < δ(s 0 − s).

(34)

In terms of the Glauber dynamics...

General Framework Analiticity

Stochastic Dynamics (cont.)

Glauber Dynamics General Result Glauber Dynamics (cont.)

Theorem. Given an entire GF B 0 on L 1 s.t. for some C, α 0 > 0,

|B 0 (θ)| ≤ Ce α0 1 kθk L1 for all θ ∈ L 1 ( =⇒ B 0 ∈ E α 0 ) , there is a local (in time) solution ([0, T )) of the initial value problem

∂B t

∂t = ˜ LB t , B t|t=0 = B 0

which, for each time t ∈ [0, T ), is an entire functional on L 1 .

References

Related documents

Corollary 1.3 Let Σ satisfy the conditions of Theorem 1.1. This is the d-regular bipartite graph on vertex set {0, 1} d in which two vertices are adjacent if they differ on exactly

Over a career span of more than 25 years he established himself professionally as a bee scientists in several landmark research &amp; development areas and endeavours in:

Whether institutions established in the meaning of constitution or institution are established in the meaning of laws and regulations outside the constitution all of which

As a matter of fact, the birth and death rates on the Glauber, the contact model and the linear and polynomial voter models dynamics, are both of this type (Subsections 3.2.1–3.2.4),

C0 -semigroups, continuous systems , Markov evolution, spatial birthand-death dynamics, correlation functions, evolution equations, Vlasov scaling, Vlasov equation, scaling limits

Evangelia and Loli, Marianna (2015) Evaluation of seismic hazard for the assessment of historical elements at risk : description of input and selection of intensity

APIA POG Seminar April 2011 Peter Tuft Hoop Stress Internal Pressure Uniform hoop stress 9.. APIA POG Seminar April 2011

Corollary: For sufficiently large λ, there is some number q of colours such that the Glauber dynamics for (q, λ)-Potts mixes rapidly for the toroidal grid, but mixes torpidly for