• No results found

Implementing Nursing Bedside Handover

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Implementing Nursing Bedside Handover"

Copied!
15
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Implementing Nursing Bedside

Handover

Professor Wendy Chaboyer

Ms Joanne Johnson

Professor Anne McMurray

Professor Marianne Wallis

(2)

Research Aims

To describe bedside handover in nursing in terms of:

1. Structures;

2. Processes;

3. Outcomes.

Expected Outcome

Development of a toolkit of standard operating protocols

(SOPs) that can be used by wards wanting to implement

bedside handover.

(3)

Research Design

¾

Case study with nested ‘cases’ at each site (i.e each ward).

Sample

¾

6 wards in 2 Australian hospitals (Qld and WA)

Data Collection

¾

Observation of bedside handover for 5 days in each ward

¾

In-depth interviews with various nursing staff

(4)

Data Analysis

¾

Descriptive statistics (SPSS)

¾

Thematic content analysis

Ethics Approval

¾

Two universities and two hospitals approved this study

(5)

Results

• 532 bedside handovers were observed

• Average length of handover 1 minute 16 seconds (

±

45 sec)

• 34 in-depth interviews were conducted (15 RNs, 7 CNs, 7

ENs, 5 NUM/Educators); about half were full time.

(6)

239 (45%) 154 (57%)

85 (32%)

Active patient involvement

156 (59%) Recommendations 118 (45%) Assessment 148 (56%) Background N/A Not used 171 (65%) Situation

Report Content (SBAR)

77 (14%) N/A 77 (29%) Rehabilitation 73 (14%) 73 (27%) N/A Combined 93 (17%) 93 (35%) N/A Surgical 289 (54%) 103 (38%) 186 (71%) Medical Type of Ward Total Frequency (%) N = 532 Hospital B Frequency (%) N = 269 Hospital A Frequency (%) N = 263

Observations

(7)

Overview of Results

Outcomes 1. Staff 2. Patients Structures 1. Staff 2. Patients 3. Handover sheet 4. Bedside chart Processes 1. Prior to handover 2. During handover ¾ Content ¾ Safety scan ¾ Confidentiality 3. After handover

(8)

Structures

Observation record, medication record, fluid balance, risk assessments (falls, pressure ulcers)

Bedside chart

Computer generated and updated each shift

Contains pt history (+ social), discharge planning, changes in condition; other priority information, sensitive information

Handover sheet

•Condition may limit participation (asleep, ↓LOC, isolation) Patients

•2-3 teams per ward with H/O given in each team

•Team leader of outgoing team and all oncoming team members •Shift coordinator attends 1 team H/O then gets short report

from other team leaders Staff

(9)

Processes – Prior to Handover

• Patient allocation completed by outgoing charge nurse.

• Handover sheet contains information on all patients on the

ward; updated each shift and copies made for oncoming staff.

• Patient informed that bedside handover will start shortly.

(10)

Processes – During Handover

• Outgoing staff introduce patient to oncoming staff.

• Content: reason for admission, history, tests, treatments, ADL, nursing care plan, changes in patient condition, pending tests or specimens. • SBAR used when patients are less known to staff.

Safety Scan: patient (visual check), environment (equipment, lines),

bedside chart (observation and medication record, risk assessments). • Patients invited to comment or ask questions.

• Patients presence prompts other key issues to be discussed.

• Confidential/sensitive information on the handover sheet or shared away from patients and visitors.

(11)

Processes – After Handover

• Team leaders give the charge nurse a short handover if the

charge nurse did not attend the bedside handover.

• Handover sheet is key component of this handover.

• Staff who start ‘between handovers’ join teams, using the

handover sheet as a guide for tasks to be undertaken under

the directions of the team leader.

(12)

Outcomes

(interview data)

• Patients feel part of the handover process and have input into their care. • More accurate information is communicated.

• Better understanding of patients’ conditions is gained. • Patients are visually ‘seen’ sooner in the shift.

• Continuity of care is improved.

• Patient can prompt recall of important events and issues. • Improves communication among staff at change of shift. • More opportunities for teaching and modelling behaviours.

(13)

Implementation Issues

• How to handle patient confidentiality?

• How to handle variable start times?

• How to ensure shift co-ordinator receives handover

information?

(14)

Conclusion

1. Bedside handover can improve content accuracy, and

provides staff with learning opportunities.

2. Including patients in the handover acts as another safety

mechanism in addition to the ‘safety scan’.

3. Bedside handover can be successfully implemented if a

structured approach to change is adopted.

4. Two drivers are needed for a change to bedside handover;

top-down and bottom-up; One without the other increases

the difficulty of successful adoption.

(15)

Acknowledgement

This study was funded by the Australian

Commission for Safety and Quality in Health

Care

Support of the nursing staff of two hospitals is

gratefully acknowledged

References

Related documents

In the present study, we introduced a pan- species Plasmodium -specific real-time PCR for the diagnosis of malaria infections. Prior to developing such the PCR,

• Delete Confirmation Email Template – Email Template to send email deletion confirmation to customers after successfully deleting their account • Enable sending

Patients entering this open-label extension study had opted to continue from a previous acute study, and so are a selected group of patients who thought they had benefited (137 out

In comparison to the study using Dronabinol, the study which used Lamotrigine for central pain treatment showed that MS patients were reported to have a decrease

Through our parametric model, we link the effect size of pCR with the predicted survivial effect size. This enables us to assess power for treatment comparison in survival outcomes

2004 Academic research motivated by the influence of minimum wages on teenage and youth employment in Greece. Looks at variation between 15-19 year olds and 20-24 year

The IRE|BS Foundation for African Real Estate Research has been collecting outputs and publications of researchers, who delivered their work and published it on