• No results found

REPAD: An empirical model of pitch angle distributions for energetic electrons in the Earth's outer radiation belt

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "REPAD: An empirical model of pitch angle distributions for energetic electrons in the Earth's outer radiation belt"

Copied!
18
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Figure

Figure 1. Three typical pitch angle distributions for radiation belt elec-trons. (a) Pancake distribution, (b) butterdistribution
Figure 4e; flattop PADs have both negative
Figure 5. Model grids used in REPAD. (a) Contours of L shell grids (gray circles) and MLTgrids (radial gray lines) in the magnetic[0, 100) nT
Figure 6. Check the independence between fitting coefficient C0 and cn’s. (a1) The joint probability distribution of (C0, c2),i.e., Prob(C0, c2), by fitting PADs for 782 keV electrons as observed during the whole CRRES mission
+7

References

Related documents

Although the study group with nonoperated hypospadias was small and the authors did not explain the degree of uncorrected hypospadias, these patients did not seem to suffer

Using protein datasets generated from the 3 mice, we used NSAF values to estimate the relative abundance of pro- teins that were identified as common in all three mice ver- sus

Results: We found: 1) ~75% of 32 host defense proteins were lower in uninfected SP-A-/- vs wild type, suggesting increased susceptibility to infection or oxidative injury; 2) At 4

In order to assess the potential sources of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis were designed to conduct according to partici- pants ’ characteristics (healthy persons, metabolic

quality, sleep disturbance and ≥ 5% of weight loss in low-income overweight or obese postpartum women enrolled in a community-based lifestyle behavior intervention study aimed

From the perspective of causal diagrams, several studies had claimed that matching on confounders C in matched case-control designs can improve estimation precision for the effect

The group of the operated patients who stated that if they had to decide again, they would not have opted for DCH did not differ significantly in their neuropsycholo- gical