I - Development Framework

(1)

DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK

GENERAL BACKGROUND

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

Numerous stories and beliefs had passed on through the years regarding how Caloocan came to be known by its present name. The following stands out as the most popular: from its beginning as a humble barrio of the town of Tondo located in a ‘libis’ (lowland), it became known as ‘Libis Espina’ or ‘Aromahan’. Another interesting story tells of Caloocan originating either from the Tagalog word ‘look’ meaning bay or ‘sulok’ meaning corner. Caloocan might have meant ‘nasa sulok’ or in the corner since Caloocan is located where the ends of the old town of Tondo and Tambobong (now Malabon) meet.

At the end of the 18th century, the fishermen of Aromahan climbed the hills to open homesteads in Caloocan. Here, the land was free of thorny plants that infested the banks/ shorelines and although the hill was naturally stony, some form of agriculture was possible and fishermen became farmers.

In 1815, Caloocan was separated from Tondo and became an independent municipality. Its original territory extended to the foothills of Marikina, San Mateo and Montalban in the east; from Tinajeros, Tanza and Tala Rivers in the North; San Francisco del Monte, Sampalok, Sta. Cruz and Tondo in the south; and Dagat-Dagatan or Aromahan in the west. (See Map No. 1 and 2)

Caloocan was part of history, which unfolded during the 1896 Philippine Revolution. The first settlement in Libis Espina, established by oppressed people from Tondo, sought refuge in the thorny shores of Dagat-Dagatan. They climbed the hills for more arable lands only to find out these had titles under the name of the Hacienda de Maysilo. Then they fought their landlords for a hundred years until Andres Bonifacio led them, the Katipuneros, to that fateful day of August 30, 1896 in Balintawak. The Filipino forces in Caloocan participated actively in Intramuros siege of the Spanish forces in Manila until their surrender to the Americans on August 13, 1898. On January 11, 1899, the people of Caloocan showed resistance to coming to terms with the Americans, who were bent on extending their supremacy over the country. When the Americans seized the railroad yards that stood between them and the fleeing Emilio Aguinaldo, the men of Caloocan fought the new invaders on February 23, 1899, in a counter-attack which, but for Gen. Antonio Luna’s rift with Aguinaldo’s loyalists, could have turned the tide of war in favor of a free and independent Philippines.

In 1901, under the American Regime, Caloocan became one of the towns of the Province of Rizal. Due to the consolidation of several municipalities, Novaliches became part of Caloocan pursuant to Act 942, as amended by Acts 984 and 1008 of the Philippine Commission. In 1939, pursuant to Commonwealth Act 502, which created Quezon City as Capital of the Philipines, Caloocan lost the following barrios or sitios, namely: Balingasa, Kaingin, Kangkong, La Loma, Malamig, Matalahib, Masambong, San Isidro, San Jose, Santol and Tatalon.

Map No. G-1 Geographical Location

(2)

In 1949, boundaries of Quezon City were redefined pursuant to Republic Act 392 as recommended by the Capital City Planning Commission. Caloocan again lost several barrios, namely: Baesa, Bagbag, Bahay-Toro, Banlat, Novaliches, Pasong Tamo, San Bartolome and Talipapa. This explains why the City of Caloocan has two separate territories. (See Map No. 1)

Then in 1961, the late Mayor Macario B. Asistio, Sr., led the people of Caloocan to turn the historic town into a city through a plebiscite held in accordance with House Bill 6038, which was passed and approved by both chambers of the defunct Philippine Congress.

GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION AND LAND AREA

Caloocan has a combined total land area of 5,333.40 hectares and is located at the northern part of the National

Capital Region (NCR, Region IV-A). The city is divided into two

geographic locations, namely: South Caloocan, with an area of 1,362.50 hectares and North Caloocan, with an area of 3,970.90 hectares. South Caloocan is bounded on the north-northwest by Valenzuela, Malabon and Navotas; on the east by Quezon City; and on the south by the City of Manila. The greatest length, north to south of the boundaries is about six kilometers and the greatest width, east to west is seven kilometers. North Caloocan, on the other hand, is bounded on the north-northwest by the province of Bulacan; on the south-southeast by Quezon City; and southwest by Valenzuela. Its extreme southern boundary is about 1.7 Kilometers apart from the northern extreme boundary of South Caloocan. The greatest length, north to south of the boundaries is eight kilometers and the greatest width, east to west is ten kilometers.

TOPOGRAPHY

SOUTH CALOOCAN

The topography of South Caloocan is characterized to have a westward trend of flat lands covering a land area of about 1,001.64 hectares or 74.25% of the whole southern portion of the city, with slopes ranging from 0% to 3%. Being flat and highly accessible to neighboring cities and municipalities, these broadly level lands cover most of the commercial and industrial establishments in the city. Along the North Diversion Road, the topography of South Caloocan, gradually changes into gently to moderately sloping to rolling, with slopes ranging from 3 to 18%. Adjacent to residential and industrial areas within the sector, vast tracts of land still exist. Also in these areas lies the highest point found to be 35.00 meters above mean sea level, while the lowest is in the southernmost end of Kaunlaran Village (Dagat-Dagatan Development Project) measuring about 0.993 meters above mean sea level.

Map No. G-2 Original Territorial Boundaries

Map No. G-3 Metro Manila Map

(3)

NORTH CALOOCAN

Out of the total land area of North Caloocan, 58.49% or 2,322.80 hectares are characterized to have gently to steeply undulating to rolling topography with slopes ranging from 3 to 18%. This terrain is noted in the northern and central portion and gradually transforming into a southward trend of flat lands down to the southwestern tip of the boundary. Several industrial and residential subdivisions have already been developed in these broadly to nearly level lands, because of its proximity to some of the major access roads in the area. The central and northern portions on the other hand, are also known to consist of residential subdivisions dispersed in different areas along with the development of Tala Estate Resettlement Project, which is significant in the

(4)

northernmost end of the city. It is with the contours of Tala Estate (part of Pangarap Village) that the highest point of elevation can be traced to be 120.00 meters above mean sea level, while the old district of Kaybiga covers the lowest part to about 25.00 meters above the same index.

CLIMATE

Just like the rest of the towns and cities of Metro Manila, Caloocan City falls under type 1 of the Philippine Climate Classification. The two distinct seasons recognized are the dry high pressure season, which comes in the months of November till April and the wet season, which starts from May and lasts up to October. The dry season corresponds with the northeast monsoon (October to January) and the wet season with the southwest monsoon (June to September). Between these two well-defined monsoon periods, the southeast trade winds blow from February to May. Table No. G – 1 CLIMATOLOGICAL NORMALS Caloocan City (1994) Month Rainfall (mm) Rainy Days

Temperature (oC) Mean Sea Level Pressure

Prevailing Wind Maximum Minimum Mean Direction Speed (mps)

South Caloocan (Port Area Station, Manila)

January 41.2 10 29.8 25.4 27.6 1,012.0 N 10 February 1.6 1 31.3 26.1 28.7 1,011.7 W 10 March 12.0 3 32.2 26.5 29.4 1,012.7 WSW 10 April 22.4 2 34.2 27.8 31.0 1,009.7 W 13 May 169.3 15 33.9 28.1 31.0 1,008.6 SSW 12 June 241.8 19 32.9 27.4 30.2 1,008.3 SSW 15 July 761.7 31 29.9 26.0 28.0 1,006.3 SSW 17 August 367.8 16 32.1 27.3 29.7 1,008.4 SSW 10 September 276.4 18 31.9 26.8 29.4 1,008.4 SSW 15 October 80.7 11 31.5 27.1 29.3 1,009.9 SSW 28 November 44.7 3 31.5 26.6 29.1 1,012.7 NE 10 December 96.3 7 30.5 25.9 28.2 1,013.3 NE 12 Annual 2,115.9 136 31.8 26.8 29.3 1,010.2 SSW 14

North Caloocan (Science Garden, Diliman, Quezon City)

January - - 30.9 20.4 25.7 1,011.2 N 12 February 162.0 3 32.8 21.5 27.2 1,009.9 W 18 March 1.0 1 31.0 19.9 25.5 1,011.1 N - April 158.0 4 32.9 23.0 28.0 1,008.0 S 18 May 14.0 1 36.1 24.4 30.3 1,007.4 S 18 June 3,255.0 13 34.4 25.2 29.8 1,006.0 W 20 July 4,959.0 23 32.0 24.3 28.2 1,005.3 S 16 August 4,747.0 26 31.1 23.8 27.5 1,004.7 W 13 September 5,183.0 27 31.0 24.0 27.5 1,006.2 W 20 October 3,512.0 15 31.2 24.0 27.6 1,008.4 N 26 November 2,242.0 14 30.9 20.4 25.7 1,011.2 N 12 December 1,654.0 17 32.8 21.5 27.2 1,009.9 W 18 Annual 25,887.0 144 31.0 19.9 25.5 1,011.1 N -

(5)

RAINFALL

Since Caloocan is divided into two separate geographical location, two recording stations were considered in the study of the city’s annual rainfall. The recording station in Port Area, Manila was considered for South Caloocan, while the Science Garden in Diliman, Quezon City was for North Caloocan. In 1994, maximum rainfall in North and South Caloocan occur in the months of

July, August and September. The annual rainfall was recorded to be 2,115.90 mm with a maximum of 761.70 mm in July and a minimum of 1.60 mm in February for the South Caloocan. North Caloocan recorded 2,588.70 mm annual rainfall with a maximum of 518.30 mm.

WIND DIRECTION

In South Caloocan, northeast winds prevail during the months of November and December. West wind is predominant in February, March and April. From May to October, the southwest monsoon blows. This procures the heavy rain experienced during that period. Maximum wind speed recorded in South Caloocan was 28 miles per second, which occurs in October. Meanwhile, the north winds prevail during the months of January, March, October, November and December over North Caloocan. From April till July, the southwest monsoon prevails, this explains the heavy rains experienced during these months.

Figure No. G-1 MONTHLY RAINFALL (in mm.)

Caloocan City (1994) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

January February March April May June July August September October November December

(6)

Figure No. G – 2

MEAN TEMPERATURE ( Deg. C ) Caloocan City (1994)

SLOPE

Slope is an important factor in determining the suitability of a land for its future development. Level to moderately sloping areas with good soil characteristics are most suitable for urban development while steeply sloping and rolling lands, highly prone to erosion are considered less favorable for any extensive land development. Utilizing these types of slope require higher development costs and may not be viable for the city’s economy. An estimated 2,158.14 hectares or 40.46% of the city’s total land area are found to be generally level to nearly level with a slope range of 0% to 3%. These slopes characterize most parts of South Caloocan and the southern part of North Caloocan in the old districts of Kaybiga, Llano and Deparo. Some areas are gently to moderately undulating to rolling with a slope range of 3% to 8% and with a covered land area of 1,052.51 hectares or 19.73% of the whole territory. On the other hand, an estimated 1,611.76 hectares of land or 30.22% of the total planning areas are noted to be moderately to steeply undulating to rolling with slopes ranging from 8% to 18%. About 510.98 hectares of land are traced to be very steeply sloping, with a slope range of 18% to 50% representing only 9.58%. (See Map)

Table No. G – 2

LAND AREA BY SLOPE CLASSIFICATION1 Caloocan City (1987) PERCENT SLOPE LAND AREA (in hectares) % DISTRIBUTION PER PLANNING AREA SLOPE CHARACTERISTICS RECOMMENDED USE 00 - 03% South North 1,011.64 1,646.50 74.25

28.87 Broad to level to nearly level

High density urban development 03 - 08% South North 271.01 781.50 19.89 19.68 Gently to moderately undulating and gently rolling to rolling in more than one direction Medium density urban development 08 - 18% South North 70.56 1,541.20 5.18 38.81 Moderately to steeply undulating and has gently rolling land

Low density urban development 18 - 50% South North 9.28 501.70 2.05 12.63

Very steeply sloping in more than one direction

"Non-functional" open spaces

1

Source : Based on Topographic Map prepared by Almar Surveying Co., Inc., 1987

0 10 20 30 40 50

January February March April May June July August September October November December

(7)

(8)

(9)

SOIL

BASIC SOIL TYPES

Soil found in Caloocan City predominantly fall under the Novaliches series. This series is found in both South and North Caloocan. In area distribution, Novaliches clay loam has the largest coverage with an area of 2, 538.87 hectares or 47.60% of the total land area. This is followed by Novaliches clay loam adobe with an area of 1,195.94 hectares or 22.42% of the total area and Novaliches loam with an area of 869.70 hectares or 16.31% of the total area. In some areas, about 9.79% or 522.25 hectares of land comprises Prensa clay loam type falling under the Prensa series and the remaining 206.64 hectares representing 3.87% of the land area consist of Hydrosol type.

THE NOVALICHES SERIES

The Novaliches soils cover 96.13% of the total land area of the city. The soils are light reddish brown, reddish brown to bright reddish brown in color. The surface and subsoil are friable in consistency and granular in structure. In the subsoils, spherical concretions are present and underneath are tuffaceous material of varying

(10)

degrees of disintegration and weathering. In some places, this tuffaceous material is exposed by extensive erosion. (See Table No. and )

Table No. G-3

AREA DISTRIBUTION OF SOIL TYPES PER PLANNING AREA 2

Caloocan City (1987)

TYPE

NO. SOIL TYPE

LAND AREA

(in hectare) % DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS SOUTH NORTH SOUTH NORTH

11 Novaliches

Loam - 869.70 - 21.90

Poor in organic matter,surface soil is friable and easily eroded

12 Novaliches

Clay 368.22 2,170.65 27.02 54.66

Surface soil is friable when dry and slightly sticky when wet, substratum are highly weathered tuffaceous materials 17 Novaliches Clay, Loam and Adobe 787.64 408.30 57.81 10.28

Surface soil is friable and in some places shallow, substratum is compacvt volcanic tuff / adobe rock

6 Prensa Clay - 522.25 - 13.15

Surface soil is loose and granular, presence in some places of volcanic tuffaceous materials used for building purposes

1 Hydrosol

(Rizal) 206.64 - 15.17 -

Former body of water now a reclaimed area, presence of salt intrusion

2

Source : Based on Topographic Map prepared by Almar Surveying Co., Inc., 1987

SOIL TYPES AND CHARACTERISTICS3 Caloocan City

SOIL TYPE DEPTH (in cm.) CHARACTERISTIC

Novaliches Loam

20 – 40

Reddish brown, friable and fine to coarse granular loam. Concretions are present and the soil is comparatively poor in organic matter. Being friable, the soil is easily eroded. 40 – 60 Brownish red, friable and granular clay loam with concretions

and gravel.

60 – 111 Light brick to rusty red.

111 – below Varying degrees of weathering. Novaliches Clay Loam

12 - 29

Red to light reddish brown clay loam, granular and friable when seemingly dry and slightly sticky when wet. Presence of brown concretions in considerable amount.

54 - 81 Brick red clay loam to clay with gravel reddish brown concretions

(11)

SOIL TYPE DEPTH (in cm.) CHARACTERISTIC

Novaliches Clay

Loam Adobe 0 - 5 Brown loose and friable loam to clay loam.

5 -20 Dark brown granular clay loam with gravel and concretions

20 - 35 Adobe clay loam with concretions and gravel, highly weathered tuff.

60 Weathered adobe rock, slightly compact

Downward Compact and massive adobe rock

Prensa Clay Loam 20 – 25 _{Brown to dark yellowish brown clay loam, loose and} granular with plenty of spherical iron concretion.

40 – 50

Gray, light yellowish gray to dull grayish brown, loose and gravelly clay grading to sandy clay with plenty of concretions.

50 – downward Gravelly clay, light grayish brown or dark brown in color.

3

Source : Soil Map based on Bureau of Soils Report, 1935

TERRITORIAL COMPOSITION

The City of Caloocan is divided into 16 zones, which is composed of 188 barangays. The breakdown is as follows:

Zone 01 – Barangay 1 – 12 Zone 09 – Barangay 94 – 105

It is further divided into two political boundaries, namely: District 1 and District 2. District 1 is composed of 70 barangays, which include Barangays 1 to 4, 77 to 85 and 132 to 188, while District 2 is composed of 118 barangays, which include Barangays 5 to 76 and 86 to 131.

(12)

(13)

(14)

DEMOGRAPHY

Population and Average Annual Growth Rate

In 1903, the Census of Population and Housing (CPH) reported a population of 7,847 for Caloocan City. This figure significantly doubled in 1918. In 1960, the population zoomed to 145,523 and in 1980, Caloocan’s population was just nearing its half a million mark at 467,816. As of the latest census conducted by the National Statistics Office (NSO) in 2000, the city’s total population reached its one million mark at 1,177,604, 15.09% higher from the census of 1995. The average annual growth rate based on 1995 and 2000 actual census is 3.06% extremely higher compared to the National Capital Region’s (NCR) 1.06. Caloocan City ranked third among the cities and municipalities in the country and accounted for 1.54% of the national population of 76.5 million. It is projected that by year 2013 the population of Caloocan will reach 1,743,152.

Table No. G - 5

HISTORICAL GROWTH OF POPULATION (1903 – 2000) Caloocan City, 2000

DATE ACTUAL POPULATION GROWTH RATE

March 2, 1903 7,847 December 31, 1918 19,551 5.9674 January 1, 1939 38,320 3.3202 October 1, 1948 58,208 4.2423 February 15, 1960 145,523 8.4209 May 6, 1970 274,453 6.3853 May 1, 1975 397,201 7.6734 May 1, 1980 467,816 3.3268 May 1, 1990 761,824 4.9973 September 1, 1995 1,023,159 5.6858 May 1, 2000 1,177,604 3.0584

Source: Various Census Years, National Statistics Office

Figure No. G-3

HISTORICAL GROWTH OF POPULATION (1903 – 2000) Caloocan City, 2000 0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 700000 800000 900000 1000000 1100000 1200000 0 5.9674 3.3202 4.2423 8.4209 6.3853 7.6734 3.3268 4.99735.6858 3.0584

(15)

Table No. G - 6

ACTUAL AND PROJECTED POPULATION (1990-2013) Caloocan City

YEAR TOTAL Based on Geographic Location Based on Political District

North South District I District II

ACTUAL 1990 781,824 277,635 484,189 421,517 340,307 1995 1,023,159 482,351 540,808 653,704 369,455 2000 1,177,604 609,812 567,792 789,129 388,475 P P 2001 1,213,674 628,491 585,183 813,300 400,374 R O 2002 1,250,849 647,741 603,108 838,211 412,637 O P 2003 1,289,162 667,582 621,581 863,886 425,277 J U 2004 1,328,649 688,030 640,620 890,347 438,303 E L 2005 1,369,346 709,104 660,242 917,618 451,728 C A 2006 1,411,289 730,824 680,465 945,725 465,564 T T 2007 1,454,517 753,209 701,308 974,692 479,825 E I 2008 1,499,069 776,280 722,789 1,004,547 494,522 D O 2009 1,544,985 800,057 744,928 1,035,316 509,669 N 2010 1,592,308 824,563 767,745 1,067,028 525,280 2011 1,641,080 849,819 791,261 1,099,711 541,369 2012 1,691,346 875,849 815,497 1,133,399 557,947 2013 1,743,152 902,676 840,476 1,168,111 575,041 Figure No. G - 4

COMPARATIVE NORTH AND SOUTH CALOOCAN POPULATION 1990 to 2013

Population Distribution

The 1995 Census of Population and Housing showed that the population in South Caloocan exceeds that of North Caloocan. However, the 2000 census, showed otherwise. Barangay 176 in North Caloocan, was registered as the biggest barangay in the Philippines. It had a population of 188,419, which accounted for 16% of the city’s total population. On the other hand, Barangay 76 in South Caloocan registered the least number of populations at 106. Barangays 84 and 105 had the fastest growing population in the city with an annual growth rate of 31% and 25%, respectively.

YEAR 0 200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 1990 1995 2000_{2001 2002 2003} 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 ₂₀₁₃

(16)

Household Population, Household Size and Population Density

As of year 2000, the city represented 11.88% (1,174,673) of NCRs total household population of 9,880,102. At an average household size of 5 persons per household, Caloocan City has a total number of 249,567 households. This number increased by 3.014% from 1995 to 2000. The average city household size decreased from 6 in 1970 to 4.7 in 2000. Bagong Silang has the most number of households at 38,388 while Bgy. 76 have 12 households.

In 2000, population density was placed at 221 persons per hectare reflecting an increase of 29 persons per hectare for the past five years. In the same year, South Caloocan had 417 persons per hectare and North Caloocan had 154 persons. In 2013, it is projected that there will be 327 persons living per hectare in the city at a population of 1,743,152.

Table No. G - 7

DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE PER BARANGAY City of Caloocan (2000)

BARANGAY NO.

POPULATION NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS

HOUSE-HOLD SIZE

LAND AREA (HECTARE)

POP. DENSITY (POP./H.)

2000(Actual) 2008(Projected) 2000(Actual) 2008(Projected) 2000(Actual) 2008(Projected)

1 2,719 3,461 645 820 4.22 3.40 799.71 1,017.94 2 5,071 6,455 1,161 1,477 4.37 4.16 1,281.99 1,551.92 3 2,385 3,036 548 698 4.35 3.80 627.63 798.94 4 2,313 2,944 557 709 4.15 5.00 462.60 588.80 5 3,050 3,883 726 924 4.20 6.18 493.53 628.32 6 1,236 1,573 245 312 5.40 2.36 523.73 666.53 7 2,584 3,289 541 688 4.78 4.68 552.14 702.78 8 19,679 25,051 4,343 5,530 4.53 30.44 646.48 822.96 9 2,042 2,599 403 513 5.07 8.80 232.05 295.34 10 1,066 1,357 227 289 4.70 3.26 326.99 416.26 11 1,669 2,125 375 477 4.45 3.72 448.66 571.24 12 27,841 35,441 5,931 7,557 4.69 40.72 683.72 870.36 ZONE 1 71,655 91,215 15,702 19,995 4.56 116.52 614.96 148.33 BARANGAY NO.

HOUSE-HOLD SIZE

2000(Actual) 2008 (Projected) 2000(Actual) 2008(Projected) 2000(Actual) 2008(Projected)

13 1,354 1,724 300 382 4.51 5.26 257.41 327.76 14 20,706 26,358 4,335 5,514 4.78 18.70 1,107.27 1,409.52 15 1,663 2,117 339 431 4.91 5.98 278.09 354.01 16 3,112 3,962 740 941 4.21 17.68 176.02 224.10 17 4.040 5,143 869 1,106 4.65 4.96 814.52 1,036.90 18 10,442 13,292 2.058 1,647 8.07 31.55 330.97 421.30 19 3,555 4,525 735 935 4.84 5.10 687.06 887.25 20 7,326 9,326 1,523 1,939 4.81 36.68 199.73 254.25 21 3,485 4,436 729 928 4.78 5.36 650.19 827.61 22 7,168 9,125 1,654 2,107 4.33 35.16 203.87 259.53 23 2,430 3,093 500 636 4.86 3.30 736.36 937.27 24 2,602 3,312 569 725 4.57 3.56 730.90 930.34 ZONE 2 67,883 86,414 14,351 17,292 4.73 173.29 391.73 498.67 BARANGAY NO.

HOUSE-HOLD SIZE

25 1,642 2,090 362 460 4.54 2.88 570.14 570.14 726.39 26 3,473 4,421 756 963 4.59 4.82 720.54 720.54 917.22 27 3,665 4,665 843 1,073 4.35 4.48 818.08 818.08 818.08 818.08 1,041.29 28 27,448 34,941 5,794 7,371 4.74 30.50 899.93 899.93 1,145.61 29 1,808 2,302 385 490 4.70 3.90 463.59 463.59 590.26 30 3,355 4,271 690 879 4.86 6.00 559.17 559.17 711.83 31 4,435 5,646 903 1,150 4.91 17.08 259.66 259.66 330.56 32 2,895 3,685 597 760 4.85 3.95 732.91 732.91 932.91 33 5,732 7,297 1,254 1,597 4.57 3.00 3.00 1,910.67 1,910.83 2,432.33 34 5,660 7,205 1,194 1,520 4.74 16.18 16.18 349.81 349.81 445.30 35 18,132 23,082 3,794 4,829 4.78 11.96 11.96 1,516.05 1,615.05 1,929.93 ZONE 3 78,245 99,604 16,572 21,091 4.72 104.75 746.97 950.87

(17)

HOUSE-HOLD SIZE

2000 (Actual) 2008 (Projected) 2000(Actual) 2008(Projected) 2000(Actual) 2008(Projected)

36 5,885 7,491 1,262 1,608 4.66 4.80 1,226.04 1,560.63 37 4,162 5,298 952 1,212 4.37 6.00 693.67 883 38 4,195 5,340 854 1,088 4.91 4.10 1,023.17 1,302.44 39 1,735 2,209 367 467 4.73 1.92 903.65 1,150.52 40 1,493 1,901 319 406 4.68 3.32 449.70 572.59 41 1,212 1,543 228 290 5.32 3.28 369.51 470.43 42 615 783 142 181 4.33 3.32 185.24 235.84 43 4,287 5,457 849 1,081 5.05 3.60 1,190.83 1,515.83 44 685 872 128 163 5.35 3.64 188.19 239.56 45 691 880 158 201 4.37 3.64 189.84 241.76 46 1,957 2,491 481 612 4.07 4.16 470.43 598.80 47 571 727 116 148 4.92 3.64 156.87 199.73 48 549 699 141 180 3.89 3.64 150.82 192.03 ZONE 4 28,037 35,691 5,997 7,636 4.68 49.06 571.48 727.50 BARANGAY NO.

LAND AREA (HECTARE)

HOUSE-HOLD

SIZE

49 5,175 6,588 1,032 1,315 5.01 4.88 1,060.45 1,350.00 50 1,570 1,999 324 412 4.85 3.10 506.45 644.84 51 1,405 1,789 334 425 4.21 5.14 273.35 348.05 52 2,878 3,664 701 891 4.11 3.64 790.66 1,006.59 53 1,275 1,623 275 350 4.64 4.50 283.33 360.67 54 1,250 1,591 285 362 4.39 6.80 183.82 233.97 55 1,403 1,786 280 356 5.01 6.80 206.32 262.65 56 3,824 4,868 753 958 5.08 3.80 1,006.32 1,281.05 57 1,096 1,395 224 285 4.89 4.80 228.33 290.63 58 852 1,085 185 235 4.61 4.50 189.33 241.11 ZONE 5 20,728 26,386 4,393 5,591 4.72 47.96 432.19 550.17 BARANGAY NO.

POPULATION NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS)

HOUSE-HOLD SIZE

59 4,599 5,854 909 1,157 5.06 4.50 1,022.00 1,300.89 60 1,913 2,435 437 556 4.38 4.50 425.11 541.11 61 1,709 2,176 371 472 4.61 6.90 247.68 315.36 62 528 672 129 164 4.09 6.90 76.52 97.39 63 3,804 4,842 733 933 5.19 4.20 905.71 1,152.86 64 1,856 2,363 386 491 4.81 2.80 662.86 843.93 65 1,170 1,489 245 312 4.78 2.15 544.19 692.56 66 1,970 2,508 424 539 4.65 4.00 492.50 627.00 67 2,767 3,522 566 720 4.89 5.02 551.20 701.59 68 1,892 2,408 286 364 6.62 5.70 331.93 422.46 69 3,059 3,894 616 784 4.97 3.00 1,019.67 1,298.00 70 4,197 5,343 817 1,039 5.14 5.50 763.09 971.45 ZONE 6 29,464 37,507 5,919 7,531 4.98 55.17 534.06 70.23 BARANGAY NO.

HOUSE-HOLD SIZE

2000(Actual) 2008 (Projected) 2000(Actual) 2008 Projected) 2000(Actual) 2008 Projected)

71 941 1,198 207 263 4.55 4.30 218.84 278.60 72 214 272 47 60 4.55 4.24 50.00 64.15 73 15,204 19,354 2,240 4,254 4.55 13.70 47.00 1,412.70 74 3,265 4,156 753 958 4.34 6.75 1,109.78 615.70 75 2,781 3,540 669 851 4.16 4.25 483.70 832.94 76 106 135 12 15 8.83 2.15 654.35 62.79 77 877 1,116 202 257 4.34 5.10 49.30 218.82 78 1,478 1,881 312 397 4.74 5.80 171.96 324.31 79 621 791 139 177 4.47 6.20 254.83 127.58 80 2,968 3,801 597 760 5.00 31.50 100.16 120.67 ZONE 7 28,473 36,246 6,278 7,992 4.54 83.99 94.79 431.55

(18)

HOUSE-HOLD SIZE

2000 (Actual) 2008 (Projected) 2000(Actual) 2008 (Projected) 2000(Actual) 2008 Projected)

81 2,490 3,170 587 755 4.24 6.76 368.34 468.93 82 2,308 2,938 511 650 4.52 5.00 461.60 587.60 83 1,540 1,960 327 416 4.71 6.04 254.97 324.50 84 2,164 2,755 468 596 4.62 14.70 147.21 187.41 85 1,173 1,493 255 325 4.60 5.04 232.74 296.23 86 2,491 3,171 597 760 4.17 6.32 394.15 501.74 87 751 956 180 229 4.17 7.36 102.04 129.89 88 2,569 3,270 500 636 5.14 7.82 328.52 418.16 89 1,564 1,991 368 468 4.25 7.36 212.50 270.52 90 2,241 2,853 561 715 3.99 8.06 278.04 353.97 91 117 1,422 223 284 5.01 8.96 124.67 158.71 92 732 932 163 208 4.49 5.04 145.24 184.92 93 4,073 5,185 935 1,189 4.36 6.24 652.72 830.93 ZONE 8 25,213 32,096 5,675 7,232 4.44 94.70 266.24 338.92 BARANGAY NO.

HOUSE-HOLD SIZE

2000( Actual) 2008 (Projected) 2000(Actual) 2008 (Projected) 2000(Actual) 2008 Projected)

94 879 1,119 182 232 4.83 4.60 191.09 243.26 95 2,950 3,755 635 808 4.65 6.36 463.84 590.41 96 1,536 1,955 344 437 4.47 9.52 161.34 205.36 97 2,150 2,737 483 615 4.45 3.96 542.93 691.16 98 2,461 3,133 493 628 4.99 2.64 932.20 1,186.74 99 758 965 158 201 4.80 3.30 229.70 292.42 100 1,549 1,972 360 459 4.30 5.40 286.85 365.19 101 2,326 2,961 504 641 4.62 9.36 248.50 316.35 102 2,366 3,012 503 641 4.70 5.40 438.15 557.78 103 870 1,107 177 225 4.92 8.06 107.94 137.34 104 974 1,240 233 297 4.18 7.15 136..22 173.43 105 2,443 3,110 539 687 4.53 6.40 381.72 485.94 ZONE 9 21,262 27,066 4,611 5,869 4.61 72.15 294.69 375.14 BARANGAY NO.

HOUSE-HOLD SIZE

106 828 1,054 171 218 4.84 5.24 158.02 201.15 107 1,467 1,867 315 401 4.66 4.92 298.17 379.47 108 936 1,192 223 284 4.20 4.92 190.24 242.28 109 1,378 1,754 315 401 4.37 7.62 180.84 230.18 110 479 610 100 127 4.79 2.52 190.08 242.06 111 1,713 2,181 365 465 4.69 2.79 613.98 781.72 112 1,329 1,692 268 341 4.96 2.56 519.14 660.94 113 216 275 64 81 3.38 2.86 75.52 96.15 114 1,447 1,842 305 389 4.74 1.18 1,226.27 1,561.02 115 1,134 1,444 239 305 4.74 1.92 590.63 752.08 116 1,040 1,324 196 249 5.31 1.92 541.67 689.58 117 1,491 1,898 366 466 4.07 4.00 372.75 474.50 118 4,639 5,905 1,042 1,327 4.45 2.64 1,757.20 2,236.74 119 1,413 1,799 332 422 4.26 4.10 344.63 438.78 120 6,833 8,698 1,550 1,972 4.41 6.08 1,123.85 1,430.59 ZONE 10 26,343 26,343 33,534 5,851 5,851 7,449 4.50 4.50 55.27 55.27 476.62 476.62 606.73 BARANGAY NO.

HOUSE-HOLD SIZE

121 481 612 105 134 4.58 5.12 93.95 119.53 122 2,185 2,781 468 596 4.67 4.80 455.21 579.38 123 1,303 1,659 295 375 4.42 2.56 508.98 648.05 124 711 905 136 173 5.23 2.56 277.73 353.52 125 1,649 2,099 350 446 4.71 3.60 458.06 583.06 126 1,510 1,922 301 383 5.02 5.40 279.63 355.93 127 2,262 2,879 508 647 4.45 3.96 571.21 727.02 128 1,658 2,111 343 437 4.83 2.20 753.64 959.55 129 1,792 2,281 360 458 4.98 2.20 814.55 1,036.82 130 2,766 3,521 585 744 4.73 2.00 1,383.00 1,760.50 131 2,980 3,793 586 745 5.09 5.00 596.00 758.60 ZONE 11 19,297 24,565 4,037 5,138 4.78 39.40 489.77 623.48

(19)

HOUSE-HOLD SIZE

2000 (Actual) 2008 (Projected) 2000(Actual) 2008 (Projected) 2000(Actual) 2008(Projected)

132 6,678 8,501 1,299 1,654 5.14 5.50 1,214.18 1,545.64 133 4,982 6,342 1,075 1,370 4.63 3.60 1,383.89 1,761.67 134 1,036 1,319 223 284 4.65 8.84 117.19 149.21 135 634 807 169 215 3.75 8.84 71.72 91.29 136 410 522 86 109 4.77 8.72 47.02 59.86 137 1,060 1,349 253 322 4.19 8.72 121.56 154.70 138 1,463 1,862 304 387 4.81 8.84 165.50 210.33 139 3,499 4,454 731 930 4.79 8.50 411.65 524.00 140 995 1,267 206 262 4.83 5.56 178.96 227.88 141 3,129 3,983 665 846 4.71 5.84 535.79 682.02 ZONE 12 23,886 30,406 5,011 6,379 4.77 72.96 327.38 416.75 BARANGAY NO.

POPULATION NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS HOUSEHO

LD SIZE

2000 (Actual) 2008 (Projected) 2000(Actual) 2008 (Projected) 2000(Actual) 2008(Projected)

142 4,205 5,353 849 1,081 4.95 3.00 1,401.67 1,784.33 143 3,588 4,567 737 938 4.87 2.30 1,560.00 1,985.65 144 4,239 5,396 888 1,131 4.77 2.96 1,432.09 1,822.97 145 5,266 6,704 1,054 1,341 5.00 3.40 1,548.82 1,971.76 146 3,039 3,869 685 871 4.44 2.84 1,070.07 1,362.32 147 3,555 4,525 787 1,001 4.52 3.92 906.89 1,154.34 148 3,914 4,982 828 1,053 4.73 3.12 1,254.49 1,596.79 149 4,819 6,134 1,033 1,314 4.67 3.88 1,242.01 1,580.93 150 4,685 5,964 977 1,242 4.80 4.04 1,159.65 1,476.24 151 4,644 5,912 993 1,263 4.68 1.76 2,638.64 3,859.09 152 4,277 5,445 840 1,070 5.09 5.00 855.40 1,089.00 153 4,038 5,140 893 1,137 4.52 2.90 1,392.41 1,772.41 154 3,670 4,672 752 957 4.88 3.00 1,223.33 1,557.41 155 3,476 4,425 750 956 4.63 5.00 695.20 885.00 ZONE 13 57,415 73,088 12,066 15,356 4.76 47.12 1,218.48 1,551.10 BARANGAY NO.

HOUSE-HOLD SIZE

2000 (Actual) 2008(Projected) 2000(Actual) 2008 (Projected) 2000(Actual) 2008(Projected)

156 5,934 7,554 1,204 1,532 4.93 6.40 927.19 1,180.31 157 3,069 3,907 674 859 4.55 2.00 1,534.50 1,953.50 158 2,045 2,603 429 546 4.77 11.20 182.59 1,825.89 159 4,098 5,217 913 1,162 4.49 15.84 258.71 329.36 160 14,061 17,899 3,050 3,883 4.61 69.76 201.56 256.58 161 7,900 10,057 1,760 2,240 4.49 51.20 154.30 196.43 162 12,481 15,888 2,746 3,492 4.55 49.28 253.27 322.40 163 8,303 10,570 1,814 2,308 4.58 41.92 198.07 252.15 164 12,000 15,276 2,589 3,299 4.63 66.08 181.60 231.17 ZONE 14 69,891 88,970 15,179 19,320 4.60 313.68 222.81 283.63 BARANGAY NO.

HOUSE-HOLD SIZE

2000(Actual) 2008(Projected) 2000(Actual) 2008 (Projected) 2000(Actual) 2008(Projected)

165 20,358 25,915 4,793 6,098 4.25 110.76 183.80 233.97 166 13,365 17,013 3,105 3,957 4.30 170.28 78.49 99.95 167 19,142 24,367 4,309 5,488 4.44 179.20 106.82 135.98 168 19,675 25,046 4,200 5,352 4.68 309.20 63.63 81.00 169 3,961 5,042 756 962 5.24 57.72 68.62 87.35 170 8,696 11,070 1,991 2,533 4.37 42.56 204.32 260.10 171 33,152 42,202 7,158 9,115 4.63 537.48 61.68 78.52 172 15,965 20,323 3,246 4,131 4.92 136.84 116.67 148.52 173 9,715 12,367 2,011 2,560 4.83 96.56 100.61 128.08 174 14,778 18,812 3,114 3,960 4.75 152.64 96.82 123.24 175 34,813 44,316 7,235 9,213 4.81 266.36 130.70 166.38 176 188,419 239,853 38,388 48,850 4.91 524.68 359.11 457.14 177 50,938 64,843 10,683 13,594 4.77 188.08 270.83 344.76 178 64,148 81,659 13,369 17,012 4.80 313.12 204.87 260.79 ZONE 15 497,125 632,830 104,358 132,824 4.76 3,085.48 161.12 205.10

(20)

HOUSE-HOLD SIZE

2000(Actual) 2008(Projected) 2000(Actual) 2008 (Projected) 2000(Actual) 2008(Projected)

179 18,645 18,645 23,735 3,831 3,8311,742 4,874 4.86 4.87 190.48 190.48 97.73 97.88 124.61 180 8,799 8,799 11,201 1,742 2,218 5.05 5.05 52.00 52.00 169.21 169.21 215.40 181 16,792 16,792 21,376 3,461 3,461 4,407 4.85 4.85 78.39 78.39 214.21 214.21 272.69 182 7,586 7,586 9,657 1,572 1,7421,572 1,999 4.82 4.83 120.33 120.33 63.02 63.04 80.25 183 3,124 3,124 3,977 658 3,461 837 4.75 4.75 49.48 49.48 63.14 63.14 80.38 184 2,066 2,066 2,630 457 457 582 4.52 4.524.87 27.20 27.20 75.92 75.96 96.69 185 17,671 17,671 22,495 3,628 3,628 4,619 4.87 4.874.81 66.58 66.58 265.40 265.41 337.86 186 11,484 11,484 14,619 2,386 2,386 3,039 4.81 4.81 151.44 151.44 75.83 75.83 965.33 187 11,673 11,673 14,860 2,608 2,608 3,317 4.44 4.48 87.08 87.08 133.04 134.05 170.65 188 14,847 14,847 18,900 3,224 3,224 4,100 4.54 4.61 62.44 62.44 234.18 237.78 302.69 ZONE 16 112,687 112,687 143,449 23,567 23,567 29,992 4.77 4.78 885.42 885.42 127.27 127.27 162.01 TOTAL 1,177,604 1,499,068 249,567 316,687 4.72 5,296.92 222.32 283.00 DISTRICT I 789,129 1,004,547 166,490 211,909 4.74 4,507.16 175.08 222.88 DISTRICT II 388,475 494,522 83,077 103,971 4.68 789.76 491.89 626.17 NORTH 609,812 776,280 127,925 162,817 4.77 3,970.90 153.57 195.49 SOUTH 567,792 722,789 121,642 152,614 4.67 1,326.02 428.19 545.08 Table No. G - 8

POPULATION, HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSEHOLD DENSITY Caloocan City, 2000 LAND AREA (Hectare) POPULATION TYPE OF DENSITY Number Density

Caloocan City 5,333.400 1,177,604 221 Medium Density

GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION

South 1,362.50 567,792 417 High Density

North 3,970.90 609,812 154 Medium Density

POLITICAL DISTRICT

District I 4,538.20 789,129 174 Medium Density District II 795.20 388,475 489 High Density

H O U S E H O L D S

Population Number Size Density

Caloocan City 1,174,673 249,567 4.71 47 GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION South 565,393 121,642 4.65 89 North 609,280 127,925 4.76 32 POLITICAL DISTRICT District I 787,669 166,490 4.73 37 District II 387,004 83,077 4.66 104

AGE, SEX COMPOSITION

The City had a median age of 23 which means half of the population was below 23 years old. The age sex pyramid for Caloocan shows a higher proportion of population aged 1-34 years old. Young population ages below 14 years old constituted about 34.60% of the total population, while those aged 65 years old and over form about 2.50%. During the last 15 years, population ages below 14 years old had been declining from 36.69% in 1980 to 35.74% in 1995. The same age group bracket continuously declined to 34.60% in 2000. The working population ages 15-64 years old showed an increase of 61.04% in 1980 to 62.90% in 2000. These economically active groups (15-64) composed the main bulk of the city’s population.

(21)

Table No. G - 9 AGE, SEX COMPOSITION

Caloocan City, 2000

AGE GROUP _POPULATIONHOUSEHOLD MALE FEMALE SEX RATIO

Under 1 30,978 16,054 14,924 108 1 to 4 121,264 62,012 59,252 105 5 to 9 137,015 70,401 66,614 106 10 to 14 117,196 59,081 58,115 102 15 to 19 113,552 55,017 58,535 94 20 to 24 119,083 57,125 61,958 92 25 to 29 106,948 52,836 54,112 98 30 to 34 99,683 50,191 49,492 102 35 to 39 85,354 43,069 42,285 102 40 to 44 72,372 36,914 35,458 104 45 to 49 54,368 27,878 26,490 105 50 to 54 41,472 20,924 20,548 102 55 to 59 25,347 12,736 12,611 101 60 to 64 20,673 9,785 10,888 90 65 to 69 13,098 5,949 7,149 83 70 to 74 7,868 3,370 4,498 75 75 to 79 4,440 1,705 2,735 62 80 & over 3,962 1,303 2,659 49 Caloocan City 1,174,673 586,350 588,323 100

Source: National Statistics Office, 2000 Census of Population and Housing

The sex ratio of the population in the city showed a slight dominance of female population over the male population from 1980 to 2000. It can be noted that in 2000, there is a male dominance in the productive age groups from 30-34 to 55-59.

Figure No. G - 5

POPULATION PYRAMID Caloocan City, 2000

Dependency Ratio

Dependency ratio from 1995 to 2000 increased by 2.32% with the bulk of dependents coming from age group 0-14. In 2000, male dependents exceeded female in age group 0-14 while in age group 65 and above; the female dominated the male dependents.

Under 1 1 to 4 5 to 9 10 to 14 15 to 19 20 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 34 35 to 39 40 to 44 45 to 49 50 to 54 55 to 59 60 to 64 65 to 69 70 to 74 75 to 79 80 & over Female Male

(22)

Table No. G - 10 DEPENDENCY RATIO

NUMBER RATIO

TOTAL MALE TOTAL MALE TOTAL MALE

Caloocan City

Young Age Dependent (ages 0-14) 406,554 207,595 198,959 55 56 53 Old-Age Dependent (ages 65 and above) 29,514 12,401 17,113 4 3 5 Total Dependent 436,068 219,996 216,072 59 59 58 Potential Labor Force (ages 15 - 64) 741,536 367,894 373,642

North Caloocan

South Caloocan

Table No. G - 11

COMPARATIVE DEPENDENCY RATIO: 1995 and 2000 Caloocan City, 2000

1995 2000 2008

Young Age Dependent (ages 0-14) 365,646 406,554 517,536 Old Age Dependent (ages 65 and above) 23,101 29,514 36,636

Total Dependent 388,747 436,068 554,172

Potential Labor Force (ages 15-64) 634,412 741,536 943,622

COMPARATIVE DEPENDENCY RATIO: 1995 and 2000 Caloocan City

POPULATION BY MARITAL STATUS

Caloocan City was composed of 644,763 population with single marital status (including population ages 9 years old and below) or 54.75% of the total population and 413,498 married population or 35.11% of the total population as of the 2000 census. Of the 413,498 married populations 69,357 belong to the age group of 30-34 and 58,230 belong to the age group of 25-29. Meanwhile, the very young individuals who belong to age 20 and below totaled to 9,695. Divorced/separated individuals registered a total of 13,341 while 56,763 were under the common law or live-in status.

406,554

29,514 741,536

2000

Young Age Dependent (ages 0-14) Old Age Dependent (ages 65 and above) Potential Labor Force (ages 15-64)

517,536

36,636 943,622

2008

Young Age Dependent (ages 0-14) Old Age Dependent (ages 65 and above) Potential Labor Force (ages 15-64)

(23)

TOTAL HOUSEHOLD POPULATION 10 YEARS OLD AND OVER BY AGE GROUP AND MARITAL STATUS Caloocan City, 2000

AGE GROUP

TOTAL POP’N. 10 YRS. OLD &

OVER

SINGLE MARRIED WIDOWED DIVORCED/

SEPARATED OTHERS UNKNOWN

Caloocan City 888,290 355,449 413,498 32,221 13,341 56,763 17,018 Below 20 231,125 207,380 9,695 447 492 4,399 8,712 20 – 24 119,928 72,504 31,329 465 1,047 11,639 2,944 25 – 29 107,462 34,338 58,230 600 1,641 11,192 1,461 30 – 34 99,957 17,498 69,357 998 1,884 9,170 1,050 35 – 39 85,566 9,313 65,070 1,469 2,084 6,899 731 40 – 44 72,526 5,307 57,314 2,393 1,923 5,093 496 45 – 49 54,511 3,213 43,082 2,883 1,533 3,401 399 50 – 54 41,570 2.227 31,775 3,882 1,145 2,268 333 55 – 59 25,404 1,117 18,772 3,513 678 1,128 196 60 – 64 20,727 994 13,958 4,377 426 730 242 65 – 69 13,147 611 7,832 3,863 250 455 136 70 – 74 7,918 411 3,983 3,061 131 187 145 75 - 79 4,463 256 1,779 2,208 59 92 69 80 & 0ver 3,986 280 1,322 2,122 48 110 104

Source: National Statistics Office, 2000 Census of Population and Housing

TOTAL POPULATION 10 YEARS OLD AND OVER BY AGE GROUP AND MARITAL STATUS

Population By Religious Affiliation

The 2000 census indicated that the city is predominantly composed of Roman Catholics with a percent share of 88% of the total population. The remaining 12% were shared by other identified religions each having a less than 1% share.

355,449 413,498 32,221 13,341 56,763 17,018 Single Married Widowed Divorced/Separated Others Unknown

(24)

HOUSEHOLD POPULATION BY RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION Caloocan City, 2000

RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION BOTH SEXES MALE FEMALE

Total 1,174,673 586,350 588,323 Roman Catholic 1,034,788 517,065 517,723 Iglesia ni Cristo 38,983 19,491 19,492 Evangelicals 36,758 17,895 18,836 Islam 3,207 1,566 1,641 Buddhist 2,284 1,108 1,176 Aglipayan 1,386 679 707 Other Protestants 17,319 8,326 8,993 Others 11,542 5,672 5,870 None 743 390 353 Unknown 27,663 14,158 13,505

Source: National statistics Office, 2000 Census of Population and Housing

HOUSEHOLD POPULATION BY RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION Caloocan City, 2000

LANGUAGE OR DIALECT GENERALLY SPOKEN IN THE HOUSEHOLDS Caloocan City, 2000

DIALECT NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS PERCENTAGE

Total 249,567 95.743 Tagalog 238,945 0.469 Ilocano 1,171 0.468 Bikol/Bicol 1,160 0.455 Cebuano 1,137 0.425 Bisaya/Binisaya 1,062 0.289 Waray 802 0.321 Pangasinan/Panggalatok 722 0.237 Marano 593 0.230 Hiligaynon/Ilonggo 575 0.228 Tausug 571 0.698

Other Local Dialect 1,742 0.142

Chinese 356 0.176

American/English 44 0.176

Other Foreign Ethnicity 22 0.008

Source: National statistics Office, 2000 Census of Population and Housing

Roman Catholic Iglesia Ni Cristo Evangelicals Islam Buddhist Aglipayan Other Protestants Others None Unknown

(25)

Population By Mother Tongue:

The 2000 census showed that Tagalog is mother tongue to about 96% of the city’s total household population. The remaining 4% of the population speaks other dialect having less than 1% share each.

LANGUAGE OR DIALECT GENERALLY SPOKEN IN THE HOUSEHOLDS Caloocan City, 2000

Population By Ethnicity:

The 2000 census revealed that the Tagalogs dominated the inhabitants of the city with 69.72% of the total population. Other residents particularly those from Regions 1, 5 and 8 shared the remaining percent of 30.28%.

HOUSEHOLD POPULATION BY ETHNICITY AND SEX Caloocan City, 2000

ETHNICITY BOTH SEXES MALE FEMALE

Caloocan City 1,174,673 586,350 588,323 Tagalog 818,954 409,908 409,046 Bikol/ Bicol 59,276 30,311 28,965 Bisaya/ Binisaya 46,374 22,473 23,901 Ilocano 44,487 22,105 22,382 Waray 37,523 18,330 19,193 Others 134,230 66,166 68,064

Other Foreign Ethnicity 302 204 98

Not Reported 33,527 16,853 16,674 238,945 1,171 1,160 1,137 1,062 802 722 593 575 571 1,742 356 44 22 Tagalog Ilocano Bikol/Bicol Cebuano Bisaya/Binisaya Waray Pangasinan/Panggalatok Marano Hiligaynon/Ilonggo Tausug

Other Local Dialect Chinese

American/English Other Foreign Ethnicity

(26)

HOUSEHOLD POPULATION BY ETHNICITY Caloocan City, 2000

Literacy of Population Ages 10 Years and Over:

The 2000 census indicated that there were 863,982 household populations over 10 years old who are literate. Literacy rate was registered at 97.58%. The males posted higher literacy rate at 97.61 than the females at 92.55 in year 2000 as compared to the 1995 census wherein the females recorded higher literacy rate of 94.39 over the males 94.17.

LITERACY OF HOUSEHOLD POPULATION 10 YEARS OLD AND OVER BY SEX Caloocan City, 2000

AGE GROUP AND SEX _Total TOTAL _Total _Total

Both Sexes 885,416 863,982 21,434

Male 437,883 427,427 10,456

Female 447,533 436,555 10,978

LITERACY OF HOUSEHOLD POPULATION 10 YEARS OLD AND OVER BY SEX Caloocan City, 2000

818,954 59,276 46,374 44,487 37,523 134,230 302 33,527 Tagalog Bikol/ Bicol Bisaya/ Binisaya Ilocano Waray Others Other Foreign Ethnicity Not Reported 427,427 436,555

Age Group and Sex

Literate

Male Female

10,456 10,978

Age Group and Sex

Illiterate

Male Female

(27)

Population By Highest Educational Attainment

In 2000, 37% of the 5 years old and over population (1,022,431) reported high school and 28% elementary as the highest educational attainment.. Around 5% had a college degree while 14.23% was classified college undergraduates. A smaller proportion (3%) of the population did not complete any grade level.

Table No. G-17

HOUSEHOLD POPULATION 5 YEARS OLD AND OVER BY HIGHEST EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

HIGHEST EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT HH POPULATION 5 YRS. OLD & OVER MALE FEMALE

Caloocan City 1,022,431 508,284 515,147 No Grade Completed 26,910 13,952 12,660 Pre-School 25,910 13,429 12,481 Elementary 285,683 141,717 143,966 High School 373,923 185,243 188,680 Post Secondary 50,738 26,115 24,623 College Undergraduate 145,458 73,267 72,191 Academic Degree Holder 54,235 24,813 29,422

Post Baccalaureate 4,606 2,090 2,516

Not Stated 55,266 27,658 27,608

Figure No. G-12

HOUSEHOLD POPULATION 5 YEARS OLD AND OVER BY HIGHEST EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Caloocan City, 2000 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 Male Female No Grade Completed Pre-School Elementary High School Post Secondary College Undergraduate Academic Degree Holder P Post Baccalaureate Not Stated

(28)

LAND USE

Land use is a term provided herein to illustrate or describe specific use or predominant activity being permanently or temporarily undertaken within a defined land area and boundary. These land uses are believed to characterize the urban development trends and are formed as a result of socio-economic and political activities and decisions prevailing within an area. Likewise, land use patterns and distributions affect the general safety and quality of life of local residents in terms of their length and convenience of travels between one land use activity to another, susceptibility to air, water and noise pollution, environmental and sanitary conditions, the distribution of basic commodities and other variables relative thereto.

South Caloocan is known for industries and commercial centers but based on its actual land use distribution, 63% of the total land area is residential use. Industrial use covers the next highest share of about 11%, followed by the commercial which is 7%. And only 7% are identified as vacant and urbanizable.

North Caloocan has a different land use character from South Caloocan. Only 46% of its total land area are residential use, followed by a big share of 36% of vacant land. Only 4% of this total covers industrial use and a very small 0.4% for commercial use.

Comparative Land Area Distribution, Existing & Proposed Land Use, South Caloocan City, January 2003

Land Use

Existing Land Use Distribution - - 1990

Existing Land Use

Distribution - - 2001 _Difference _{% Increase} Land Area % Share Land Area % Share

Residential 819.80 60.2% 682.55 50.1% (137.25) -16.7% Commercial 95.10 7.0% 201.97 14.8% 106.87 112.4% Industrial 96.00 7.0% 218.53 16.0% 122.53 127.6% Institutional 47.00 3.4% 60.21 4.4% 13.21 28.1% Utilities 53.90 4.0% 42.62 3.1% (11.28) -20.9% Agro-Industrial - 0.0% 2.08 0.2% 2.08 0.0% Cemetery 64.94 4.8% 64.937 4.8% - 0.0%

Parks & Recreation - 0.0% 1.28 0.1% 1.28 0.0% Open Space 4.70 0.3% - 0.0% (4.70) -100.0% Vacant Land 181.06 13.3% 88.32 6.5% (92.74) -51.2% PLAND - 0.0% - 0.0% - TOTAL 1,362.50 100.0% 1,362.50 100.0% 0.00 Residential 60.17% Commercial 6.98% Industrial 7.05% Institutional 3.45% Utilities 3.96% Cemetery 4.77% Parks & Recreation 0.00% Open Space 0.34% Vacant Land 13.29%

EXISTING LAND USE DISTRIBUTION SOUTH CALOOCAN CITY 1990 Residential 50.10% Commercial 14.82% Industrial 16.04% Institutional 4.42% Utilities 3.13% Cemetery 4.77% Parks & Recreation 0.09% Open Space 0.00% Vacant Land 6.48%

EXISTING LAND USE DISTRIBUTION SOUTH CALOOCAN CITY 2001

(29)

Comparative Land Area Distribution, Existing & Proposed Land Use, North Caloocan City, January 2003

Land Use

Difference % Increase Land Area % Share Land Area % Share

Residential 1,775.70 44.7% 2,597.10 65.4% 821.40 46.3% Commercial 12.60 0.3% 47.72 1.2% 35.12 278.7% Industrial 154.10 3.9% 171.45 4.3% 17.35 11.30% Institutional 49.20 1.2% 64.97 1.6% 15.77 32.1% Utilities 57.70 1.5% 57.70 1.5% - 0.0% Agro-Industrial 33.60 0.8% 9.78 0.2% (23.82) -70.9% Cemetery 22.90 0.6% 30.34 0.8% 7.44 32.5%

Parks & Recreation - 0.0% 9.77 0.2% 9.77 0.0%

Open Space 187.20 4.7% - 0.0% (187.20) -100.0% Vacant Land 1,677.90 42.3% 982.07 24.7% (695.83) -41.5% PLAND - 0.0% - 0.0% - 0.0% TOTAL 3,970.90 100.0% 3,970.90 100.0% - Residential 44.72% Commercial 0.32% Industrial 3.88% Institutional 1.24% Utilities 1.45% Cemetery 0.58% Parks & Recreation 0.00% Open Space 4.71% Vacant Land 42.25%

EXISTING LAND USE DISTRIBUTION NORTH CALOOCAN CITY 1990 Residential 65.40% Commercial 1.20% Industrial 4.32% Institutional 1.64% Utilities 1.45% Cemetery 0.76% Parks & Recreation 0.25% Open Space 0.00% Vacant Land 24.73%

EXISTING LAND USE DISTRIBUTION NORTH CALOOCAN CITY 2001

(30)

Comparative Land Area Distribution, Existing & Proposed Land Use, North and South Caloocan City, January 2003

Land Use

Difference % Increase Land Area % Share Land Area % Share

Residential 2,595.50 48.7% 3,279.65 1.15% 684.15 26.4% Commercial 107.70 2.0% 249.69 4.7% 141.99 131.8% Industrial 250.10 4.7% 389.97 7.3% 139.87 55.9% Institutional 96.20 1.8% 125.19 2.3% 28.99 30.1% Utilities 111.60 2.1% 100.32 1.9% (11.28) -10.1% Agro-Industrial 33.60 0.6% 11.86 0.2% (21.74) -64.7% Cemetery 87.84 1.6% 95.28 1.8% 7.44 8.5%

Parks & Recreation - 0.0% 11.06 0.2% 11.06 0.0%

Open Space 191.90 3.6% - 0.0% (191.90) 0.0% Vacant Land 1,858.96 34.9% 1,070.39 20.1% (788.57) -42.4% PLAND - 0.0% - 0.0% - 0.0 TOTAL 5,333.40 100.0% 5.333.40 100.0% 0.00 Residential 48.67% Commercial 2.02% Industrial 4.69% Institutional 1.80% Utilities 2.09% Cemetery 1.65% Parks & Recreation 0.00% Open Space 3.60% Vacant Land 34.86%

EXISTING LAND USE DISTRIBUTION NORTH AND SOUTH CALOOCAN CITY 1990

Residential 61.49% Commercial 4.68% Industrial 7.31% Institutional 2.35% Utilities 1.88% Cemetery 1.79% Parks & Recreation 0.21% Open Space 0.00% Vacant Land 20.07%

EXISTING LAND USE DISTRIBUTION NORTH AND SOUTH CALOOCAN CITY 2001

(31)

(32)

I - Development Framework

DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK

GENERAL BACKGROUND

DEMOGRAPHY

Population and Average Annual Growth Rate

Population Distribution

Household Population, Household Size and Population Density

AGE, SEX COMPOSITION

Dependency Ratio

POPULATION BY MARITAL STATUS

2000

2008

Population By Religious Affiliation

Age Group and Sex

Literate

Age Group and Sex

Illiterate

Population By Highest Educational Attainment

LAND USE

EXISTING LAND USE MAP

NORTH CALOOCAN CITY