• No results found

Cargo Flows & Hot Spots

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Cargo Flows & Hot Spots"

Copied!
26
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Cargo Flows & Hot Spots

Peter Colon

Buck Consultants International

German-Dutch Logistics Conference

March 2015

Buck Consultants International P.O. Box 1456 6501 BL Nijmegen The Netherlands P: +31 24 379 0222 M: +31 62 241 3921 F: +31 24 379 0120 E: [email protected]

(2)

1 Framework

Macro

level

Business

level

Regional

level

2

3

4

(3)

2 Macro level: global developments

(2015-2016), (% growth per annum)

2012-14

2015-16f

China

7.5

7.0

India

5.0

6.5

Global

3.2

3.8

United States

2.2

3.0

Australia

3.0

2.7

United Kingdom

1.8

2.6

Germany

0.8

1.5

Netherlands

-0.5

1.5

France

0.4

1.1

Japan

1.1

0.9

(4)

2011 PPP Rank Country GDP at PPP (2011 US$bn) 1 US 15,094 2 China 11,347 3 India 4,531 4 Japan 4,381 5 Germany 3,221 6 Russia 3,031 7 Brazil 2,305 8 France 2,303 9 UK 2,287 10 Italy 1,979 2030 Country Projected GDP at PPP (2011 US$bn) China 30,634 US 23,376 India 13,716 Japan 5,842 Russia 5,308 Brazil 4,685 Germany 4,118 Mexico 3,662 UK 3,499 France 3,427 2050 Country Projected GDP at PPP (2011 US$bn) China 53,856 US 37,998 India 34,704 Brazil 8,825 Japan 8,065 Russia 8,013 Mexico 7,409 Indonesia 6,346 Germany 5,822 France 5,714

Actual and projected top 20 economies ranked based

on GDP in PPP terms

1)

(5)

Companies have more and more a global scope for all types

of operations

Global Scope

Operation

Regions within

US / Countries in

Europe & Asia

Regions of the

World / Continents

Global

Production

Distribution

R&D

Back offices

Marketing & Sales

(6)

3 Business level: supply chain

developments

(7)

The dynamics that impact the supply chain are numerous

Rapidly and unpredictably changing markets

A shift from mass markets to fragmented niche markets

Fast growth of e-commerce/ e-fulfilment

Ever shortening product life cycles

Growing pressure on financial impact of supply chain performance

Continuous pressure to squeeze waste (both time and cost) out of the

supply process

Supply chain management becomes ‘core business’

More flexible and tailored supply chains

(8)

Why focus on strategic network design?

The majority of the value

chains lifecycle costs are

locked-in at the start

Decisions Value

Source: AMR

Distribution network

Inventory locations

Assembly network

In-house vs. contract manufacturers

Logistics suppliers

20

%

Operational Tactical Strategic

80%

(9)

It is not only about costs!

Network optimization Network scenario’s Leadtime requirements Operations costs Order fill requirements Transport costs Capacity flexibility Inventory costs Information availability Tax and duties Fixed vs. variable Existing partners Existing facilities Laws & regulations Existing sources Service objectives Cost objectives Design constraints

(10)

Example: BCI Client in FMCG industry

TO

FROM

Overall SC cost

from 132M€ to

117M€ (- 12%)

7M€ saving in

transport spend

OTIF from

below 70% to

>95%

RESULTS

FROM TO Locations 80 35

Transport consolidation Not in place 2M saving

Purchasing Decentral Centralized

(11)

Main supply chain configurations

EDC-structure

Centralized control and execution (the 90’s)

Characteristics

Primary production In or near market region

Secondary production

Mainly integrated in primary

production function, trend towards integration in DC

Distribution Centralized in single Euro DC or

local market DC’s

Inventory European inventory

Planning Centralized

Customer service De-centralized

(12)

Main supply chain configurations

BDC-structure

RDC-structure

EDC-structure

From centralized control and execution (the 90’s)

(13)

Characteristics

Primary production Off-shore or Near-shore Secondary

production

In market/low cost region

Distribution Regional DC’s

 Direct sourced

 Satellite structure / X-dock

Inventory European inventory

Planning Centralized

Customer service Regionalized

Shared services Centralized / regionalized

1-tier

2-tier

Today:

Decentralized NETWORKS with

central control…towards

product-market specific, hybrid

supply chains

(14)

Network Re-Design in Healthcare Industries

Centralized

Central + Sats

Regionalized

Hub spoke per

 Fully centralized

High value / low volume products

 Often parcel type of

distribution

 Main inventory in central

warehouse

 Local sats replenished by EDC

 Sometimes combined with

postponement

 Strategic stocks in country DCs

Medium - High value products

 Regional DCs (4-6) supplying a fixed

region

 Logical clusters of countries

“Big Pharma” portfolios

 Regional DCs (4-6) supplying a fixed

(15)

4 Regional level: hot spot

Overview of logistics hot

spots in Rhine corridor

(no order in numbering)

1 Rotterdam

2 Moerdijk-Tilburg

3 Venlo-Venray

4

Nijmegen-Arnhem-Emmerich

5 Duisburg-Düsseldorf

6 Mannheim-Ludwigshafen

7 Strassbourg

8 Rheinport Basel

1

3

2

4

5

6

7

8

(16)

+

Such as:

Labor costs

Transportation costs

Occupancy costs

Incentives

Taxes

etc…

Cost factors

Such as:

Labor availability

Labor flexibility

Business climate

Infrastructure

Utilities

etc

Quality factors

(17)

Listing of cost factors for a DC

Location categories Relative weight Location factors Relative weight

1 Cost of labor In Euro 1.1 Job title A 1.2 Job title B 1.3 Job title C

In Euro In Euro In Euro

2 Transport costs In Euro 2.1 Inbound transport costs: from airport to DC 2.2 Outbound transport costs: from airport to DC

In Euro In Euro

3 Warehouse costs In Euro 3.1 Rental costs DC (+ service charges) 3.2 Land costs

3.3 Building costs

3.4 Costs for utilities infrastructure 3.5 Real estate taxes

In Euro In Euro In Euro In Euro In Euro 4 Investment incentives and grants

In Euro 4.1 Capital grants

4.2 Employment incentives 4.3 Training grants 4.4 Other incentives In Euro In Euro In Euro In Euro Total In Euro

Costs will be calculated in Euro and forecasted for the next 3 years

Quality factors (next slide) are assumed: 1= poor ; 5= excellent

(18)

Listing of quality factors for a DC

Location categories Relative weight Location factors Relative weight

A Infrastructure & accessibility

….% A1 Availability of 3PL’s

A2 Distance to international highway networks A3 Distance to international airport

A4 Distance to international cargo hub A5 Distance to customers ….% ….% ….% ….% ….%

B Labor characteristics ….% B1 Availability of logistics personnel

B2 Productivity and loyalty B3 Unemployment B4 Multilingual skills ….% ….% ….% ….%

C Customs ….% C1 Time to obtain licenses-rulings

C2 Flexibility and business orientation customs

….% ….%

D Language skills ….% D1 English language speaking skills

D2 Other language speaking skills

….% ….%

E Labor regulations ….% E1 Working schedule flexibility

E2 Hiring & Firing regulations E3 Turnover of labor

E4 Works Council involvement

….% ….% ….% ….%

F Facility & sites ….% F1 Availability pre built facilities

F2 Availability of suitable land plots F3 Building permits / timing

….% ….% ….%

G Business climate ….% G1 Corporate tax rate

G2 Ease of doing business

….% ….%

(19)

Example: Project specific site selection results for a distribution center in

perspective: cost-quality assessment

Total costs in million Euro for first 3 years (all operating costs -/- investment incentives)

2.5 3 4.5 120 80 110 100 4 90 Location A 3.5 Location B Location D Location E Location C

Cost-Quality matrix

Location F

Location G Location H Location I

(20)

Q1 :

What is the competitive position of your DC/

location/ region?

Q2 :

For what type of DCs in what industries is your

DC/region a good fit?

Q3 :

For what kind of e-fulfilment centers does your

region qualify?

(21)

Example: Project specific site selection results for a distribution center in

perspective: cost-quality assessment

Total costs in million Euro for first 3 years (all operating costs -/- investment incentives)

2.5 3 4.5 120 80 110 100 4 90 Location A 3.5 Location B Location D Location E Location C

Cost-Quality matrix

Q1: What is the position of your DC location/ region?

Location F

Location G Location H Location I

(22)

Single tier

Two tier

European

Distribution

Center

(EDC)

Typical examples

Spare parts

Computers

Microchip

Typical examples

Critical

spare parts

Motorcycles

Specialty

chemicals

Euro-Regional

Distribution

Center

(RDC)

Typical examples

Fresh food

(cool chain)

Pharmaceu-

ticals

Typical examples

FMCG

Cosmetics

Food

Clothing

Q2: For what types of DCs, in what industries

is your DC/region a good fit?

(23)

Combination

Centers

Dedicated

Centers

Hybrid

Model

Q3: For what kind of e-fulfilment centers

does your region qualify?

(24)

Recent research UK, Netherlands,

Belgium, France and Germany

Source: VIL 2014

Top 10 locations for e-FC

Top locations for e-FC

1 DE – Rheinland-Pfalz 7.74 2 DE – Saarland 7.61 3 BE – Wallonia 7.54 4 NL – South-Netherlands 7.36 5 NL – West-Netherlands 7.10 6 BE – Flanders 7.04 7 UK – East of England 7.00 8 LU – Luxembourg 6.98 9 BE – Brussels 6.95 10 FR – East France 6.95 11 DE – NRW 6.75

Main factors in this study:

Market proximity

Logistics infrastructure

Labour availability

Investment climate

(25)

5 Conclusions

On a global level the European/ German economies will

play a smaller role

On a business level, the supply chain has become a

priority in the board room

In a supply chain network the costs for production plants

and distribution centers are more crucial than

transportation costs

Supply chain configurations depend on product, customer

and transportation characteristics

(26)

For positioning a DC location/region three crucial questions

have to be answered

What is the competitive position of your DC location/

region?

For what type of DCs in what industries is your

DC/region a good fit?

For what kind of e-fulfilment centers does your region

qualify?

References

Related documents

• Attaining Abstinence from SA in clients with PTSD can result in increased PTSD symptoms • Treatment outcomes for PTSD/SA client are.. worse than for SA alone and

Note: As for all VVs, this versatile verb can be followed by a variety of prepositions; whichever best describes the action that follows. SEASON

Comprehensive thermal analysis on a number of common concrete multilayer walls with similar material properties and thicknesses demonstrated that walls with two

Assuming 140klbs string weight above the stuck point, an updrag of 40klbs and calculating the extra drag due to the increase in tension due to overpull say 30% of overpull lost in

Outcome measures: Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) of both quadratus lumborum and spinous processes from T10 to L1, lumbar flexion range of motion, stabilometry and urinary pH

I measured career-decision self-efficacy to assess college students’ abilities to accomplish tasks necessary to making career decisions, and a relationship emerged between

After reviewing both the Stafford Act and the Code of Federal Reg- ulations for “Emergency Management and Assistance,” 157 it is clear FEMA is not equipped with the

pathways engaged by FasL, TRAIL and TNF α through their cognate receptors (Fas, Death receptor 4 (DR4) and tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR1)) and the manner in