• No results found

Anti Fuzzy Meet Subsemilattice

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Anti Fuzzy Meet Subsemilattice"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Anti Fuzzy Meet Subsemilattice

1

G.Mehboobnisha,

2

B.Chellappa

1Research Scholar (Part Time-Mathematics), Alagappa University, Karaikudi-630003,

TamilNadu, India.

2

Principal, Nachiappa Swamigal Arts and Science College, Karaikudi-630003, Tamilnadu, India.

Abstract: In this paper, we made an attempt to define and study some properties of Anti Fuzzy meet subsemilattice and we introduce some definitions and theorems on the union and intersection of Anti Fuzzy meet subsemilattice.

Key words: Fuzzy meet semilattice, Fuzzy meet subsemilattice,Anti fuzzy meet subsemilattice,Anti ,Fuzzy level meet subsemilattice.

Introduction: The notion of Fuzzy sets was introduced by Zadeh,L.A.[38] in 1965.He has initiated fuzzy set theory as a modification of ordinary set theory. In this paper we define Anti fuzzy subsemilattice,Anti Fuzzy level meet subsemilattice and some related theorems.

Definition 1: Let A be a Fuzzy meet semilattice. A

fuzzy subset

T

:

A

[

0

,

1

]

of a fuzzy meet semilattice A is called a anti Fuzzy meet

subsemilattice of A if

,

,

y

A

x

T

(

x

y

)

max{

T

(

x

),

T

(

y

)}

Example 1: Let A={0,a,b,c,1}. Let

T

:

A

[

0

,

1

]

be a Fuzzy subset in A defined by

,

6

.

0

)

(

,

7

.

0

)

(

,

4

.

0

)

0

(

T

a

T

b

T

5

.

0

)

(

c

T

,

T

(

1

)

0

.

9

Thus,

T

is an anti fuzzy meet subsemilattice.

Definition 2: Let

T

be any anti fuzzy meet

subsemilattice of a fuzzy meet semilattice A and let

].

1

,

0

[

t

Then

T

t

{

x

A

/

T

(

x

)

t

}

is

called anti fuzzy level meet subsemilattice of

T

.

Example 2: From Example(1), Let t=0.6.Then

T

t

={a,1}. Then

T

t is an anti fuzzy level meet

subsemilattice of

T

.

Remark:

T

t

T

S whenever t>s

Definition 3: Let

T

1 and

T

2 be any two anti fuzzy

meet subsemilattices of a fuzzy meet semi lattice A.

Then

T

1 is said to be contained in

T

2 if

A

x

x

T

x

T

1

(

)

2

(

),

and is denoted by

. 2

1 

T

T

Definition 4: Let

T

1 and

T

2 be any two anti fuzzy

meet subsemilattices of a fuzzy meet semi lattice A.

If

T

1

(

x

)

T

2

(

x

),

x

A

, then

T

1 and

T

2

are said to be equal and it is written as

T

1=

T

2.

Definition 5: The complement of a anti fuzzy meet

subsemilattice

T

of a fuzzy meet semilattice A

symbolized by

~

T

(

x

)

1

T

(

x

),

x

A

.

Definition 6: The intersection of two anti fuzzy meet

subsemilattices

T

1 and

T

2 of a fuzzy meet

semilattice A is defined as

[

T

1

T

2

](

x

)

min{

T

1

(

x

),

T

2

(

x

)},

x

A

(2)

Definition 7: The union of two anti fuzzy meet

subsemilattices

T

1 and

T

2 of a fuzzy meet

semilattice A is defined as

[

T

1

T

2

](

x

)

max{

T

1

(

x

),

T

2

(

x

)},

x

A

.

Lemma 1: Let

T

be an anti fuzzy meet

subsemilattice of a fuzzy meet semilattice A and let

t,s

Im

T

.Then

T

t=

T

s if t=s.

Proof:

If t=s ,then

T

t

T

s .

Conversely,

Let

T

t

T

s.

Since t

Im

T

,

x

A such that

T

(

x

)

t

,

t

T

s

Hence t=

T

(

x

)

s

--- (1)

Similarly,

it can be proved that s

t--- (2)

Then from (1) and (2), t=s.

Theorem 1: Two anti fuzzy meet subsemilattices

T

and

T

of a fuzzy meet semilattice A such that the

card Im

T

are equal iff Im

T

=Im

T

and

S

F

=

F

S where

F

S={

T

t

/

T

t is an anti fuzzy

meet subsemilattices of A for all t

Im

T

} and

F

S

{

T

t

/

T

t is an anti fuzzy level meet subsemilattice of A for all t

Im

T

}

.

Proof: Let

T

 and

T

 be two anti fuzzy meet subsemilattices of a fuzzy meet semilattice A such

that the card Im

T

Assume that

T

 and

T

 are equal

(ie)

T

(

x

)

T

(

x

)

---(1)

Similarly ,

it can be proved that

Im

T

Im

T

--- (3)

(2)and(3)

Im

T

Im

T

(

4

)

)

1

(

),

0

(

)

0

(

,

).

4

(

)

1

(

,

Im

,

)

(

Im

,

)

(

)

0

(

,

,

by

T

T

t

T

x

and

by

T

t

t

x

T

T

t

t

x

T

T

t

T

x

and

F

LetT

t t S t           

t t

T

T

Similarly, it can be proved that

T

t

T

t

)

7

(

)

6

(

&

)

5

(

)

6

(

,

)

5

(

,

,

            S S S S S S S t S t t t

F

F

F

F

Similarly

F

F

F

T

but

F

T

T

T

Hence

Equation (4) and (7) completes the proof.

Conversely, assume that Im

T

=Im

T

and

S

S

F

F

To prove:

T

and

T

are equal.

Suppose

T

(

x

)

T

(

x

)

for

x

A

(3)

Then either Im

T

Im

T

or

F

S

F

S.

This is a contradiction

Hence

T

(

x

)

T

(

x

),

x

A

.

Therefore

T

and

,

T

are equal.

Theorem 2

If B is a fuzzy meet semilattice of A, B≠A ,Then the

anti fuzzy meet subsemilattice

T

of A and is

defined by

B

A

x

if

t

B

x

if

s

x

T

~

,

,

)

(

where s,t

[ 0,1], s>t is an anti fuzzy meet subsemilattice of A.

Proof:

Let x,y

A

To prove:

T

is an anti fuzzy meet subsemi lattice of

A.

(ie)To Prove:

.

T

(

x

y

)

max{

T

(

x

),

T

(

y

)}

It is proved by considering exhaustive three cases.

Case(i)

Let x,y

B.

T

(

x

)

s

,

T

(

y

)

s

.

As x,y

B

,

x

y

B

,since B is a fuzzy meet semilattice.

)}

(

),

(

max{

)

(

x

y

T

x

T

y

T

= max{s.s}

=s

Case(ii):

Let x

B,y

A~B.

T

(

x

)

s

,

T

(

y

)

t

As x

B,y

A~B,

x

y

A

Now

T

(

x

)

s

t

T

(

y

)

(ie)

T

(

x

)

T

(

y

)

)}

(

),

(

max{

)

(

)

(

,

y

T

x

T

y

x

T

T

B

for

y

x

B

y

x

  

=max{s,s}

=s

)}

(

),

(

max{

)

(

)

(

~

,

~

y

T

x

T

y

x

T

T

B

A

for

y

x

B

A

y

x

  

=max{t,t}

=t

Hence

T

is an anti fuzzy meet subsemi lattice.

Case(iii)

Let x, y

A~B,

T

(

x

)

t

,

T

(

y

)

t

As x,y

A~B,

x

y

A

~

B

or B

If x

y

A

~B, then

)}

(

),

(

max{

)

(

)

(

T

x

y

T

x

T

y

T

=max{t,t}

=t

If

x

y

B

,then

)}

(

),

(

max{

)

(

x

y

T

x

T

y

T

=max{s,s}

=s

(4)

Hence

T

is an anti fuzzy meet subsemilattice of A

in all the three cases.

Proposition 1:

A non empty fuzzy meet subset C of A is a fuzzy

meet semilattice of A iff

C is an anti fuzzy meet

subsemilattice of A.

Proof:

C

is nothing but characteristic function of the anti

fuzzy meet subsemi lattice of C.

(ie)

C

A

x

C

x

x

C

~

0

1

)

(

Where s,t

[

0

,

1

]

Then by previous theorem,the proof is complete.

Theorem 3:

The intersection of two anti fuzzy meet subsemilattices of a fuzzy meet semilattice A is also an anti fuzzy meet subsemilattice of A.

Proof:

Let A be a fuzzy meet semilattice.

Let

T

1 and

T

2be any two anti fuzzy meet

subsemilattices of A.

T.P:

T

1

T

2is an anti fuzzy meet subsemilattice

of A.

Let a,b

T

1

T

2

Then a,b

T

1 and a,b

T

2.

2

1

,

and

a

b

T

T

b

a

Hence

a

b

T

1

T

2.

Therefore

T

1

T

2 is an anti fuzzy meet

subsemilattice of A.

Theorem 4: The union of anti fuzzy meet subsemilattices of a fuzzy meet semilattice A is also an anti fuzzy meet subsemilattice of A iff one contained in the other.

Proof:

Let A be a fuzzy meet semilattice.

Let

T

1 and

T

2be any two anti fuzzy meet

subsemilattices of A such that one contained in the other.

1 

T

T

2 or

T

2

T

1

2

1 

T

T

=

T

1 or

T

1

T

2=

T

2

Then

T

1

T

2 is an anti fuzzy meet subsemilattice

of A.

Conversely, suppose

T

1

T

2 is an anti fuzzy

meet subsemilattice of A.

T.P:

T

1

T

2 or

T

2

T

1

Suppose

T

1 is not contained in

T

2

Then there exist an element a,b such that

)

2

(

,

)

1

(

,

1 2

2 1

 

 

T

b

and

T

b

T

a

and

T

a

Clearly, a,b

T

1

T

2

Since

T

1

T

2 is an antifuzzy meet subsemilattice

of A,

a

b

T

1 or

T

2

Case(i)

Let

a

b

T

1

(5)

1

1

)

(

)

(

a

b

a

a

b

b

b

T

a

Which is a contradiction to b

T

1,

by

(

2

)

Case(ii)

Let

a

b

T

2

Since

b

T

2

and

,

b

T

2

Hence

(a

b

)

b

a

(

b

b

)

a

1

a

T

2

Which is a contradiction to the assumption

a

T

2

by

(

1

)

Hence the assumption that

T

1 is not contained in

1 

T

and

T

2 is not contained in

T

1 is false.

Therefore either

T

1

T

2 or

T

2

T

1.

Theorem 5 :

Let T be any fuzzy meet subsemilattice of a fuzzy

meet semilattice A Such that Im T = {0, t}, where

t [0,1]. If T = Tµ T , where Tµ, and T

are fuzzy meet subsemilattices of A, then either Tµ

T, or T Tµ .

Proof

Suppose Tµ  T or T Tµ then there exist some x,

y A such that

Tµ(x) > T (x) and T (y) > Tµ (y)

Then t = T(x) = [Tµ

T] (x).

= max {Tµ, (x), T(x)}

= Tµ (x)

0, Since Tµ (x) > T(x)

and t = T (y) = [Tµ

T] (y)

= max [Tµ (y), T (y)}

= T (y)

0, Since T (y) > Tµ (y)

Therefore T(x) = t = T (y)

Tµ (x) = t = T (y)

T (y) < T (x) and Tµ (x) < Tµ (y)

Then Tµ (x  y) ≤ max Tµ(x), Tµ (y)}

= Tµ (y) < t ………..(1)

and T (x  y) ≤ max {T (x), T (y)}

=

T(x) < t………..…(2)

hence t = T(x  y) = [Tµ T] (x  y)

= max {Tµ (x  y), T (x  y)}

=max{Tµ(y),T(x)}

< t by (1) and (2) which is a

contradiction.

Therefore, if T = Tµ  T, then either Tµ  T or T

 Tµ .

Conclusion: Thus in this paper, we have defined Anti fuzzy meet subsemilattice and some related theorems.

References:

[1] Chellappa.B and Anand .B ,Fuzzy join semi L-ideal, Indian Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical sciences,Vol-7,Dec 2011, pp103-109.

[2] Chellappa.B and Anand.B, Fuzzy join subsemilattices, vol-7, No.2,Dec 2011, pp 111-119.

References

Related documents

4 Relative differences in costs (across speed-price scenarios, left panel) and consumption of time and fuel (across speed scenarios, right panel) between the

In addition, if statessuch as Colorado perceive cultural, political and economic threats from a rapidly increasing immigrant population, the legislature may take action

In this same chapter, Halliwell offers his own account of how to make sense of Aristotle on tragic pleasure: “Such pleasure…is considered by Aristotle to arise from the

Our study included all cases of clinically confirmed A (H7N9) infection that presented with a picture of acute respiratory infection in a hospital setting in the first epidemic in

In a recent article published in Harvard Business School Alumni Bulletin titled “What’s the Big Idea?” (Emmons, Hanna, &amp; Thompson, 2012), a timeline was presented

Antibacterial Activity with Bacterial Growth Kinetics and GC-MS Studies on Leaf and Tuber Extracts of Arisaema tortuosum (Wall.) Schott. Indian J of Pharmaceutical Education and

Hawaiian ​ Psychotria species using multiple nuclear and chloroplast DNA markers and multiple, widely-sampled individuals per species. 2) Infer the climatic niches of the Hawaiian