• No results found

Severe drought in the spring of 2020 in Poland. More of the same?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Severe drought in the spring of 2020 in Poland. More of the same?"

Copied!
13
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Agronomy 2020, 10, x; doi: FOR PEER REVIEW www.mdpi.com/journal/agronomy Institute for Agricultural and Forest Environment, Polish Academy of Sciences, Bukowska 19, Poznań

60-5

809, Poland; [email protected]

6

* Correspondence: [email protected]

7

Supplementary Material

8

(2)
(3)

Figure S1. Values of SPEI 12 for 13 analyzed stations from January 1971 to May 2020 (left column) and for

9

grid with stations from January 1950 to May 2020 based on SPEI Global Drought Monitor (right column).

10

11

(4)
(5)
(6)

Agronomy 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 13

Figure S2. Values of SPEI 24 for 13 analyzed stations from January 1971 to May 2020 (left column) and for

12

grid with stations from January 1950 to May 2020 based on SPEI Global Drought Monitor (right column).

13

14

(7)
(8)

Agronomy 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 13

Figure S3. Values of SPEI 30 for 13 analyzed stations from January 1971 to May 2020 (left column) and for

15

grid with stations from January 1950 to May 2020 based on SPEI Global Drought Monitor (right column).

16

17

(9)

Toruń Białystok Gorzów Wielkopolski Poznań Warszawa Siedlce Terespol 17 18 21 23 23 15 14 13 24 21 8 8 13 25 23 15 22 8 23 19 17 13 23 18 24 23 21 13 7 5 26 17 24 11 15 13 21 21 8 12 8 13 24 13 9 -20.96 -24.99 -30.15 -36.26 -33.97 -25.41 -16.80 -13.08 -31.93 -31.91 -17.01 -8.83 -13.49 -34.04 -29.86 -16.04 -29.69 -9.62 -30.49 -24.56 -25.67 -14.70 -25.95 -26.96 -38.57 -42.30 -30.75 -15.29 -7.47 -6.04 -25.32 -24.56 -39.60 -10.66 -21.78 -12.88 -29.71 -30.24 -9.45 -15.32 -15.05 -18.41 -34.38 -19.79 -7.53 May-90 Oct-04 Apr-17 May-20 Jun-84 Aug-90 Jul-93 Aug-06 Jul-16 May-20 Jul-72 Jun-84 Jun-90 Aug-01 May-04 Sep-06 Jun-16 Apr-19 May-84 Aug-90 Aug-93 May-04 Mar-17 Jan-20 Jun-84 May-20 Jun-77 Jun-84 Dec-92 Aug-00 May-07 Sep-16 May-20 Jun-74 Jun-84 Aug-00 Apr-04 Aug-06 Apr-19 May-20 Jul-72 Sep-92 Jul-04 Jul-06 Oct-12 -1.75 -2.13 -1.96 -2.30 -1.94 -2.46 -1.59 -1.73 -1.78 -1.98 -2.30 -1.64 -1.74 -2.18 -1.91 -1.93 -2.19 -1.68 -1.91 -1.86 -2.18 -1.64 -1.64 -2.13 -2.04 -2.23 -2.08 -1.71 -1.58 -1.90 -1.96 -2.02 -2.10 -1.50 -2.10 -2.10 -1.81 -2.59 -1.59 -1.66 -2.20 -1.80 -1.84 -1.83 -1.61 Jun-89 Nov-03 May-16 Apr-19 Jan-83 Sep-89 May-93 Jul-06 Sep-15 Nov-18 Feb-72 Apr-84 Sep-89 May-00 Mar-03 Jul-06 Aug-15 Nov-18 Feb-83 Sep-89 May-93 Nov-03 Aug-15 Apr-19 Jun-83 Jun-19 Jul-76 Apr-84 Aug-92 Jun-00 Jul-06 Aug-15 May-20 Sep-73 Apr-84 Jun-00 Mar-03 Jul-06 Nov-18 Jan-20 May-72 Aug-92 Nov-03 May-06 Jul-12

(10)

Agronomy 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 13 Zielona Góra Wrocław Kalisz Łódź Lublin Włodawa 14 24 22 15 47 15 23 23 16 10 16 26 23 14 40 12 19 15 23 23 14 31 26 21 8 11 15 9 6 18 9 23 9 12 16 25 12 8 13 21 -19.05 -34.55 -24.13 -21.99 -49.74 -18.66 -38.24 -26.49 -21.08 -11.56 -24.05 -43.04 -30.44 -18.18 -40.31 -15.04 -23.66 -25.16 -35.10 -33.63 -18.04 -35.31 -31.68 -31.78 -14.69 -13.97 -21.89 -9.25 -5.57 -20.23 -9.76 -36.18 -9.94 -13.01 -16.78 -39.73 -12.73 -10.44 -18.73 -29.52 Jun-16 May-20 May-84 Jun-93 May-07 Jul-16 May-20 Jun-91 Sep-93 Jun-95 Aug-16 May-20 Apr-91 Jul-93 Oct-06 Jun-09 Mar-13 Jul-16 May-20 Aug-84 Jul-93 Jun-07 Jul-16 May-20 Jul-72 Apr-77 Aug-83 Aug-84 Oct-06 Feb-13 Mar-16 May-20 Apr-83 May-84 Mar-97 Aug-04 Aug-06 Feb-13 Jun-16 May-20 -2.27 -1.85 -1.57 -1.96 -2.00 -1.76 -2.18 -1.87 -1.74 -1.66 -2.15 -2.24 -1.88 -1.67 -1.62 -1.66 -1.66 -2.18 -1.77 -2.10 -1.73 -1.75 -2.05 -2.16 -2.25 -1.73 -2.24 -1.72 -1.65 -1.99 -1.72 -2.32 -1.57 -1.97 -2.11 -2.30 -2.14 -1.94 -2.12 -1.93 Aug-15 Dec-19 Jan-83 May-93 Jul-06 Sep-15 Apr-19 Jul-90 Apr-93 Apr-95 Sep-15 Jul-19 Jun-90 May-93 Jul-06 Apr-09 Jul-12 Sep-15 Jun-19 Mar-84 Aug-92 Jul-06 Sep-15 Mar-20 Jun-72 Jan-77 Nov-82 Apr-84 Jul-06 Sep-12 Aug-15 Apr-19 Nov-82 Apr-84 Jun-96 Nov-03 Jul-06 Jul-12 Aug-15 Jan-20

21

Table S2. The drought periods for which the value of SPEI 24 stayed below -0.5 and lasted at least five

22

months with minimum value below -1.5 (definition of severe drought), based on results of SPEI 24. The most

23

severe values are marked in bold.

24

Station Duration (month) Cumulative deficit below -0.5 Last month of drought period Minimum value during event Data of minimum occurence Szczecin 13 13 23 45 -15.05 -16.86 -27.28 -53.47 Dec-73 Jul-84 Apr-91 May-07 -1.82 -1.54 -1.64 -1.85 Jun-73 Mar-84 Jul-90 Oct-04

(11)

Białystok Gorzów Wielkopolski Poznań Warszawa Siedlce Terespol Zielona Góra Wrocław Kalisz Łódź Lublin 12 14 51 14 16 24 59 29 12 35 23 22 14 24 25 15 25 16 64 12 15 52 26 16 13 51 54 27 20 38 27 25 30 41 24 26 20 25 39 23 12 33 20 12 23 -21.20 -17.62 -78.11 -13.96 -25.05 -28.54 -77.46 -36.51 -19.78 -49.50 -38.67 -29.35 -19.05 -28.43 -33.98 -28.41 -32.00 -14.50 -88.31 -16.66 -16.58 -70.87 -30.63 -27.05 -17.54 -61.72 -62.33 -28.86 -28.95 -37.88 -32.80 -41.18 -37.25 -45.14 -24.52 -35.50 -27.72 -37.79 -44.92 -30.65 -19.34 -41.88 -21.06 -13.67 -37.95 May-20 Aug-84 Jul-04 Dec-06 Sep-16 Sep-84 May-94 May-17 May-20 Jul-85 May-20 Mar-78 Aug-84 Aug-07 Jun-17 May-20 May-85 Aug-01 Oct-07 May-20 Aug-93 Sep-07 Mar-17 May-20 Jul-84 Sep-93 Feb-08 Jun-17 May-20 May-95 Jul-17 May-20 Feb-92 Sep-07 Mar-14 Jun-17 May-20 Jul-85 Sep-07 Mar-17 May-20 May-85 Aug-07 Apr-13 May-20 -2.14 -1.64 -2.27 -1.93 -2.19 -1.81 -2.27 -1.69 -1.92 -2.11 -2.29 -1.99 -1.70 -1.94 -2.01 -2.49 -1.84 -1.50 -2.38 -1.78 -1.66 -2.19 -1.90 -2.27 -1.50 -1.94 -1.85 -1.51 -2.12 -1.69 -1.59 -2.34 -1.78 -1.56 -1.56 -1.73 -2.05 -2.03 -1.87 -1.77 -1.99 -2.09 -2.02 -1.96 -2.39 Apr-20 May-84 May-01 Jul-06 Sep-15 Mar-84 Jun-93 Sep-16 May-20 Mar-84 Dec-19 Jan-77 Apr-84 Jul-06 Sep-16 Feb-20 Apr-84 Jun-00 Jul-06 Apr-20 Aug-92 Sep-03 Jun-16 Apr-20 Mar-84 Jun-93 Jul-06 Sep-16 Jan-20 Jun-93 May-16 Apr-20 Aug-90 Jul-06 Dec-12 Jun-16 Apr-20 Jun-84 Jul-06 Sep-15 Apr-20 Feb-84 Jul-06 Sep-12 Apr-20

(12)

Agronomy 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 12 of 13 Włodawa 15 15 6 9 48 16 -19.07 -14.57 -6.12 -9.89 -71.01 -23.89 Aug-84 Apr-91 Jun-96 Jun-97 Jun-07 May-20 -1.77 -1.76 -1.52 -1.52 -2.73 -2.03 Dec-83 Aug-90 May-96 Mar-97 Sep-03 Dec-19

25

Table S3. The drought periods for which the value of SPEI 30 stayed below -0.5 and lasted at least five

26

months with minimum value below -1.5 (definition of severe drought), based on results of SPEI 30. The most

27

severe values are marked in bold.

28

Station Duration (month) Cumulative deficit below -0.5 Last month of drought period Minimum value during event Data of minimum occurence Szczecin Toruń Białystok Gorzów Wielkopolski Poznań Warszawa Siedlce Terespol Zielona Góra Wrocław 16 23 39 27 11 26 27 15 27 23 10 22 58 21 36 60 27 7 36 49 22 25 21 36 26 26 12 25 63 11 59 22 14 49 49 14 66 34 -16.76 -26.71 -53.21 -37.94 -14.75 -39.34 -37.56 -16.66 -27.04 -33.03 -12.87 -24.45 -90.82 -25.41 -39.19 -85.30 -36.84 -9.37 -53.38 -51.98 -35.13 -30.08 -23.90 -37.81 -30.62 -34.56 -22.87 -31.63 -93.40 -11.86 -82.46 -28.04 -22.26 -64.77 -64.37 -20.60 -76.69 -37.47 Sep-74 Oct-91 May-07 Sep-17 May-20 Jul-85 Feb-92 Aug-93 Jun-07 Mar-17 May-20 Mar-85 Feb-05 Feb-17 Dec-85 Nov-94 Jun-17 May-20 Dec-85 Mar-08 May-20 Jun-78 May-85 Nov-92 Feb-08 Sep-17 May-20 Apr-85 Mar-08 May-20 Mar-08 Mar-17 May-20 Jan-94 Mar-08 May-20 May-95 Oct-06 -1.64 -1.55 -1.90 -1.92 -2.13 -2.06 -1.82 -1.55 -1.73 -2.26 -2.13 -1.54 -2.19 -1.90 -1.77 -2.11 -1.66 -1.86 -2.17 -1.51 -2.26 -2.12 -1.73 -1.54 -1.76 -2.03 -2.61 -1.71 -2.13 -1.86 -2.13 -1.68 -2.20 -1.74 -1.87 -2.06 -1.52 -1.52 Jun-73 Jan-91 Jun-05 Nov-16 May-20 Feb-84 Feb-91 Jun-93 Jul-06 Jun-16 Apr-20 Apr-84 Feb-01 Mar-16 Apr-84 Jun-93 Nov-16 May-20 Jun-84 Jul-05 May-20 Jun-77 Apr-84 Aug-92 Jul-06 Sep-16 Apr-20 Apr-84 Jul-06 Apr-20 Mar-04 Dec-15 Apr-20 Jun-93 Jul-06 May-20 Sep-94 Nov-05

(13)

Lublin Włodawa 47 41 23 10 32 22 23 49 14 -47.83 -50.39 -29.04 -12.47 -43.32 -35.25 -25.50 -76.83 -20.47 Mar-94 Mar-08 Apr-17 May-20 Nov-85 May-20 Feb-85 Jun-07 May-20 -1.51 -1.84 -1.86 -2.13 -2.09 -2.51 -1.61 -2.67 -2.14 Aug-92 Oct-06 Dec-15 Apr-20 Jun-84 Apr-20 May-84 Mar-04 Apr-20 © 2020 by the authors. Submitted for possible open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

References

Related documents

The SASES Executive Committee acts on behalf of SASES chapters and their members and works in cooperation with ASA, CSSA, and SSSA and the Student Advisory Committee to develop

Upon successful completion of the course participants are expected to develop understanding on the techniques soil moisture conservation, watershed management, preventing

i) Spawning details, including the species, physical information (such current flow and tidal phases), and temporal information including the time of year and moon phase. ii)

Although the socioeconomic impacts have been predominantly considered with respect to formal financial services like bank accounts, given that mobile money has been

With tools like Titanium Appcelerator and others, you can write your business logic in JavaScript, and write actual JavaScript code that can hook into native UI elements. So most

Hasil penelitian ini adalah: (1) buku WERB untuk kelas VII tidak memenuhi lima dari tujuh criteria buku yang baik; (2) materi suplemen berbasis lagu dikembangkan dengan

Comprehending the neural drive for emotional quiescence offers opportunities for reinterpreting the historical sociology of emotions in IR, reassessing the

The motor utilises this available excess back EMF energy to overcome and even reverse the drag EMF between stator pole and rotor pole, while furnishing only a small trigger pulse