• No results found

CHAPTER 9

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "CHAPTER 9"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

CHAPTER 9

Answers to Multiple Choice – Theoretical

1. c 6. b 11. b

2. b 7. b 12, d

3. a 8. c 13. b

4. a 9. b 14. b

5. a 10. d 15. a

Solutions to Multiple Choice – Computational

1. (a)

Total manufacturing cost: (2,200 units x P56) P123,200 Less: cost of spoiled units (200 units x P56) 11,200

Cost of good units P112,000

Unit cost: (P112,000 / 2,000 good units) P 56 (1) Manufacturing cost: (P56 – P1) x 2,200 = P121,000 Less: Scrap value of spoiled units 6,000

Cost of good units P115,000

Unit cost: (P115,000 / 2,000 good units) P 57.50 (2)

2. (d)

Charged to Specific Job:

Direct materials P 660

Direct labor 800

Manufacturing overhead (P800 x 150%) 1,200

Manufacturing cost P2,660

Unit cost: (P2,660 / 200 units) P13.30

Due to internal failure:

Manufacturing cost P2,660

Add: Rework cost

Direct materials P100

Direct labor 160

Overhead (P160 x 150%) 240 500

Total cost after rework cost P3,160

(2)

3. (d)

4. (a)

5. (c)

Charged to specific job:

Direct materials: (8,000 units x P5) P40,000 Direct labor: (8,000 units x P4) 32,000 Manufacturing overhead: (8,000 units x P3) 24,000

Manufacturing costs P96,000

Less: Scrap value (600 x P7) 4,200 Manufacturing cost net of scrap value P91,800 Unit cost: (P91,800 / 7,400 good units) P 12.41 Charged to all production:

Direct materials P 40,000

Direct labor 32,000

Manufacturing overhead: (8,000 units x P3.50) 28,000

Manufacturing cost P100,000

Less: Cost of spoiled units (600 x P12.50) 1,500 Manufacturing cost of good units P 98,500

Unit cost: (P98,500 / 7,400 good units) P 12.50

6. (b)

Charged to LGU Machine Works:

Direct materials: (1,000 x P3.50) P 7,000 Direct labor: (2,000 x P1.25) 2,500 Overhead: (P2,500 x 140%) 3,500 Manufacturing cost P13,000 Rework cost: Direct materials: (100 x P0.15) P15 Direct labor: (100 x P0.25) 25 Overhead: (P25 x 140%) 35 75

Total manufacturing cost P13,075

Unit cost: (P13,075 / 2,000 units) P6.5375 Charged to Factory Overhead Control:

Direct materials P 7,000

Direct labor 2,500

Overhead: (P2,500 x 150%) 3,750

Manufacturing cost P13,250

(3)

7. (a) 8. (b) 9. (d) Direct materials (25 x P80) P 2,000 Direct labor (25 x P194) 4,850 Overhead (P4,850 x 100%) 4,850 Total P11,700

Less: Scrap value (2 x P400) 800

Manufacturing cost of 23 units P10,900

Unit cost: (P10,900 / 23) P473.91 10. (b) Direct materials P26,951 Direct labor 15,076 Overhead 7,538 Total P49,565

Less: Cost of spoilage: (P49,565 / 2,200) x 200 units 4,506 Manufacturing cost of 2,000 units P45,059

Unit cost: (P45,059 / 2,000) P 22.53 11. (b) Direct materials (P95 x 250) P23,750 Direct labor (P6 x 5,260 DLH) 31,560 Applied overhead (P2 x 5,260 DLH) 10,520 Total P65,830

Less: Cost of spoilage (P65,830 / 250) x 10 2,633

Manufacturing cost of 240 units P63,197

Unit cost: (P63,197 / 240) P263.32 12. (d) Direct materials P30,000 Direct labor 12,500 Overhead (P12,500/P2.50) x P1.50 7,500 Total P50,000 Rework cost (P100 + P125 + P75) 300 Sales value of spoiled units (1,000 x P4) (40,000) Manufacturing cost of 9,000 units P46,300

(4)

Solutions to Problems

Problem 9-1

1. Cash/Accounts receivable 2,500

Other income 2,500

2. Cash/Accounts receivable 2,500

Cost of goods sold 2,500

3. Cash/Accounts receivable 2,500

Factory overhead control 2,500

4. Cash/Accounts receivable 2,500

Work in process inventory 2,500

Problem 9-2

1. Cash/Accounts receivable 4,000

Other income 4,000

2. Cash/Accounts receivable 4,000

Factory overhead control 4,000

3. Cash/Accounts receivable 4,000

Work in process inventory 4,000

4. Materials inventory 4,000

Factory overhead control 4,000

Work in process inventory 4,000

Materials inventory 4,000

Problem 9-3

1. Work in process inventory 54,000

Materials inventory 24,000

Payroll 10,000

Applied factory overhead 20,000

To record production cost.

Spoiled goods inventory (100 x P10) 1,000

Factory overhead control 1,700

Work in process inventory (P54,000/2,000)100 2,700 To record spoilage cost.

Finished goods inventory 51,300

Work in process inventory 51,300

To record finished goods (P54,000 – P2,700)

2.

Unit cost: (P51,300 / 1,900 units) = P27

(5)

1. Work in process inventory 208,000

Materials inventory 208,000

To record production cost

Spoiled goods inventory (200 x P100) 20,000

Work in process inventory 20,000

To record scrap value of spoiled units.

Finished goods inventory 188,000

Work in process inventory 188,000

To record cost of finished goods (P208,000 – P20,000) 2. Unit cost: (P188,000 / 1,000 units) = P188

Problem 9-5

1. Spoiled goods inventory 1,200

Factory overhead control 1,600

Work in process inventory 2,800

To record spoilage.

2. Spoiled goods inventory 2,500

Factory overhead control 300

Work in process inventory 2,800

To record spoilage.

Accounts receivable 2,500

Spoiled goods inventory 2,500

To record the offer of scrap dealer.

Problem 9-6

Entry No. 1: If spoiled units are due to customers exacting specifications. Entry No. 2: If spoiled units are due to internal failure/employee’s error.

Entry No. 3: If cost of spoiled units is unrecoverable. This is an abnormal loss charged immediately to operations.

Entry No. 4: If spoilage is traceable to a particular job and the loss is recoverable from the customer or from the insurance company.

(6)

1a. Work in process inventory 180,000

Materials inventory 92,000

Payroll 28,000

Applied factory overhead 60,000

To record manufacturing cost

Spoiled goods inventory (400 x P15) 6,000

Factory overhead control 1,200

Work in process inventory 7,200

To record cost of spoilage: (P180,000/10,000) x 400.

Finished goods inventory 172,800

Work in process inventory 172,800

To record cost of finished goods (P180,000 – P7,200) 1b. Unit cost: (P172,800 / 9,600 units) = P18.

2a. Work in process inventory 180,000

Materials inventory 92,000

Payroll 28,000

Applied factory overhead 60,000

To record manufacturing cost.

Spoiled goods inventory 6,000

Work in process inventory 6,000

To record cost of spoiled goods (400 x P15)

Finished goods inventory 174,000

Work in process inventory 174,000

To record cost of finished goods.

Cash/Accounts receivable 243,600

Sales 243,600

To record sales (P174,000 x 140%)

Cost of goods sold 174,000

Finished goods inventory 174,000

To record cost of goods sold.

2b. Unit cost: (P174,000 / 9,600 units) = P18.125

(7)

1. Spoiled goods inventory 1,800

Factory overhead control 1,800

Work in process inventory 3,600

To record cost of spoiled units (P400 x P4.50)

2. Accounts receivable 1,100

Spoiled goods inventory 1,100

To record sales of scrap.

Problem 9-9

1. Factory overhead control 1,200

Work in process inventory 1,200

To record cost destroyed units.

Unit cost of the remaining 2,300 cases is P6.

2. Spoiled goods inventory 200

Factory overhead control 1,000

Work in process inventory 1,200

To record salvage value of defective units.

3a. Accounts receivable 1,200

Work in process inventory 1,200

To record cost of defective cases chargeable to customer.

b. Factory overhead control 1,200

Work in process inventory 1,200 To record cost of defective units charged to production.

4a. Spoiled goods inventory 400

Accounts receivable 800

Work in process inventory 1,200

To record salvage value of defective units.

b. Spoiled goods inventory 400

Factory overhead control 800

Work in process inventory 1,200

To record salvage value of defective units.

5. Factory overhead control 200

Materials inventory 200

To record rejected units charged to overhead. Average unit cost is P6.00.

6. Work in process inventory 200

Materials inventory 200

To record cost of rejected units charged to a particular job.

Average unit cost: (2,500 x P6) + P200 = P15,200 / 2,500 = P6.08 7. Same.

(8)

Problem 9-10

1. Work in process inventory 13,600

Materials inventory 7,000

Payroll 3,000

Applied overhead 3,600

To record manufacturing cost.

Manufacturing overhead control 1,400

Materials inventory (200 x P1.50) 300

Payroll (15/60 x P10 x 200) 500

Applied overhead (15/60 x P12 x 200) 600 To record rework cost.

Finished goods inventory 13,600

Work in process inventory 13,600

To record cost of finished goods.

2. Unit cost: (P13,600 / 200 units) = P68

Problem 9-11

1. Work in process inventory 130,000

Materials inventory 40,000

Payroll 30,000

Applied overhead 60,000

To record manufacturing cost.

Work in process inventory 8,500

Materials inventory (1,000 x P1) 1,000

Payroll (10/60 x P15) x 1000 2,500

Applied overhead (10/60 x P30) x 1,000 5,000 To record rework cost.

Finished goods inventory 138,500

Work in process inventory 138,500

To record cost of finished goods.

(9)

Problem 9-12

1a. Work in process inventory 400,000

Materials inventory 184,000

Payroll 72,000

Applied overhead 144,000

To record manufacturing cost.

Manufacturing overhead control 4,400

Materials inventory (200 units x P4) 800

Payroll : (30/60 x P12) x 200 1,200

Applied overhead: (30/36 x P24) x 200 2,400 To record rework cost.

Finished goods inventory 400,000

Work in process inventory 400,000

To record cost of finished goods.

b. Unit cost: (P400,000 / 2,000 units) = P200

2a. Work in process inventory 400,000

Materials inventory 184,000

Payroll 72,000

Applied overhead 144,000

To record manufacturing cost.

Work in process inventory 4,400

Materials inventory 800

Payroll 1,200

Applied overhead 2,400

To record rework cost.

Finished goods inventory 404,400

Work in process inventory 404,400

To record cost of finished goods.

(10)

Problem 9—13

1a. Work in process inventory 17,100

Materials inventory 8,000

Payroll 3,500

Applied overhead (P3,500 x 160%) 5,600 To record manufacturing cost.

Manufacturing overhead control 147

Materials inventory 30

Payroll 45

Applied overhead 72

To record rework cost.

Finished goods inventory 17,100

Work in process inventory 17,100

To record cost of finished goods.

b. Unit cost: (P17,100 / 2,000 units) = P8.55

2a. Work in process inventory 16,750

Materials inventory 8,000

Payroll 3,500

Applied overhead (P3,500 x 150%) 5,250 To record manufacturing cost.

Work in process inventory 142.50

Materials inventory 30

Payroll 45

Applied overhead (P45 x 150%) 67.50 To record rework cost.

Finished goods inventory 16,892.50

Work in process inventory 16,892.50

To record cost of finished goods.

(11)

Problem 9-14

a. Predetermined overhead rate: (P462,500 / 50,000 machine hrs. ) P9.25 per MH

Direct materials P343,550

Direct labor 78,875

Applied overhead (1,540 x P9.25) 14,245

Total cost of Job 2720 P436,670

b. The rework cost is debited to the manufacturing overhead control account since the company uses a predetermined rate to apply overhead. The entry is:

Manufacturing overhead control 37,750

Various accounts 37,750

c. Predetermined overhead rate: (P425,000 / 50,000 = P8.50 per MH

Direct materials P343,550

Direct labor 78,875

Applied overhead (1,540 x P8.50) 13,090

Total cost of Job 2720 P435,515

d. Direct materials P343,550

Direct labor 78,875

Applied overhead (1,540 x P8.50) 13,090 Rework cost (P37,750 x .20) 7,550 Sale of reworked pipe (200 x P1.50) ( 300)

References

Related documents

There are several recommendations and guidelines to the development of accessible systems, such as the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). To verify that the websites are

Relative change in spectral data for both (C) and each separate session (D) are shown (solid = ASSR parameter time series; dotted = fitted Gauss; darker and lighter grey plot

Warbler-I is a nonlinear feedback shift regis- ter based pseudorandom number generator, and can generate 16-bit random numbers for the tag identification protocol of the EPC C1

As with the all-optical switch, traffic that is transiting the node remains in the optical domain, and transponders are needed only for the add/drop traffic.. These early

This study took place in Western Sweden, in the country’s second largest region, which has over 1.6 million inhabi- tants [53]. To enhance understanding of different percep- tions

Previous work from our group demonstrated that the deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) attenuates transcriptional activation of STAT5 target genes at a step following

Board member Ken Swanton requested an item on the agenda to allow resident Bill Marinelli an opportunity to speak on behalf of the opposing view in town to not support the

This study reports on a successful implementation of a low cost innovative mobile phone-based health information system to improve maternal and child care in rural India.. A