• No results found

The Marine Protected Area Inventory

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "The Marine Protected Area Inventory"

Copied!
20
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Jordan Gass, Hugo Selbie and Charlie Wahle National Marine Protected Areas Center

ESRI Ocean Forum November 6, 2013

New pictures

The Marine Protected Area Inventory

(2)

National Marine Protected Areas Center marineprotectedareas.noaa.gov

Outline

• What is the MPA Inventory?

– Purpose – Data

• How it’s used

• Future directions

– Linking sites and programs – MPA accessibility

– Ecological representativeness

– Future of the MPA Viewer

(3)

Why Inventory MPAs?

• Many types of protected areas

• Marine jurisdictions overlap

• MPA data sources are disparate

• Management authorities often based on resources

Federal State, Commonwealth, Territorial

• National Marine Sanctuaries

• National Estuarine Research Reserves

• National Parks

• Maritime Memorials

• National Seashores

• National Monuments

• National Wildlife Refuges

• Marine Life Conservation Districts

• Aquatic Preserves

• Areas of Special Biological Significance

• Ecological Reserves

• Critical Habitats

• Marine Conservation Areas

• Research Reserves

• Coastal and Marine Parks

(4)

• Create comprehensive picture of MPAs nationwide

• Inform ocean managers and policy-makers to understand where MPAs are located and what they protect

• Engage local, territorial, tribal, state, and federal programs to share information and work together

• Inform coastal and marine spatial planning

Why Inventory MPAs?

(5)

MPA Inventory

• Spatial Catalog of > 1,700 Sites

• GIS Boundaries

• Classification attributes – Conservation Focus – Level of Protection – Fishing Restrictions

– Management Plan Type – Legal Authority

• Ecological Resources

• Cultural Resources

(6)

Ecological and Cultural Resources

• Fit an ecosystem into standardized boxes

– Use best available public data online

– Decision rules developed to insure repeatable protocol – Presence/absence

• Generalized high level groupings

– Species groups – Physical habitat

– Biological use areas

– Cultural features

(7)

MPA Inventory Structure

• ESRI Geodatabase

– Spatial boundaries – Site and zone data

• MS Access databases

– Classification attributes – Resource presence

• ArcGIS Toolbox

– Analysis and data management tools – Python scripts

– Models to batch scripts

(8)

MPA Inventory Distribution

• Published as an annual update (May 2013)

• Downloadable from marineprotectedareas.noaa.gov

– Geodatabase, shapefile, metadata – Tabular data for non-GIS users

• WMS feeds for external users/geoportals

– Published through ArcGIS Server – Multipurpose Marine Cadastre – ERMA

• Online data viewer

(9)

Inventory Analyses

• National and regional statistics

– ArcToolbox scripts

– Customized subsets of inventory – E.g. MPAs in California

• Cartographic products

• Responses to partners, public

and media

(10)

Sample analyses and outreach

U.S. MPAs by Level of Protection

Only 14% of all U.S. MPAs are no take areas that prohibit the extraction or significant destruction of natural or cultural resources.

No Access 4%

No Impact 1%

No Take 7%

Other+

< 1%

Uniform Multiple Use 80%

Zoned Multiple Use 6%

Zoned w/No Take Areas 2%

93 45 16 5

29 44

181 110

77 8

60 121

274 16

48 92 94 1

346

0 100 200 300 400

Acadian Atlantic Alaskan/Fjordland Pacific Aleutian Archipelago Beaufort/Chukchi Seas Bering Sea Caribbean Sea Carolinian Atlantic Columbian Pacific Great Lakes*

Gulf Stream Hawaiian Archipelago Montereyan Pacific Transition Northern Gulf of Mexico Northern Gulf Stream Transition Pacific Remote**

South Florida/Bahamian Atlantic Southern Californian Pacific Southern Gulf of Mexico Virginian Atlantic

Number of U.S. MPAs by Ecoregion

Most U.S. MPAs (346, or 22%) located within the Virginian Atlantic marine ecoregion. Second most (274, or 18%)located in the Northern Gulf of Mexico marine ecoregion.

213 MPAs in California (CA) waters

About 32% of CA waters out to the U.S. EEZ, are in some form of MPA

25% of these MPAs prohibit all take, representing just 0.15% of CA waters out to the U.S. EEZ

28% of sites have nesting areas for migrating birds

Just over half (51%) have an ongoing biological monitoring program

Only 20% list anadromous fish species California Analyses

(11)

SPARC Tool

• Partnership with NOAA National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science

SPatial Assessment Resource Characterization Tool (SPARC)

• ArcGIS 10 Add-In

• Select MPA Area of Interest

– Select Comparison MPAs – Compare With All MPAs

• Incorporate variety of data into analysis

– MPA Classification Attributes

– Spatial or Tabular Resources Data

– Tabular Protection Data

(12)

SPARC Sample Results

• Kelp is present in 124 km 2 of California waters

• Of the 213 California MPAs, 109 (51%) have kelp resources

• Kelp covers 0.03% of MPA area

• 66 km 2 (53%) of kelp area is within MPAs

• 28 km 2 (23%) of kelp is within

no-take MPAs

(13)

Partnerships with MPA Programs and NGOs

• Combine ecological analyses with management spin

• Illustrate utility and flexibility of the Inventory

• Sample projects:

– National Wildlife Refuge Marine Protected Areas (NWR)

– MPAs and Wildlife Hotspots in the California Current (PRBO)

(14)

International Coordination

• USGS GAP Program

– PAD-US

– Assign GAP status codes to MPAs

• IUCN

– Incorporate into WDPA (protectedplanet.net)

– Assign IUCN categories to US

MPAs

(15)

Future Directions:

Revising The MPA Viewer

• The dilemma:

– The MPA viewer is popular, but can’t be updated – Based on Adobe Flash

• The goal:

– Keep the dynamic feel

– Allow for additional data exposure

– Show Inventory data and derived stories

• Possible solutions:

– Storymaps

– ArcGIS online

(16)

Future Directions:

Linking MPAs thematically and geographically

• Identify sites with common problems, e.g. climate change, sea level rise

– Pick appropriate indicators likely affected by sea level rise – Map how many of these

indicators a sites/ MPA programs have

• Create linkages across

programs, to share problems and solutions

• Outreach

(17)

Future Directions:

Identifying MPA Access

• MPA Inventory links MPAs to coastal communities via targeted stories and products

– Disseminate products using ArcGIS online services

• MPAs near population centers

– What is your nearest MPA?

– What can you do in local MPAs?

– Demonstrate the importance of MPAs

(18)

Future Directions:

How ecologically representative are US MPAs?

• Executive Order (EO) 13158 called for the establishment of “a

scientifically based,

comprehensive national system of marine protected areas (MPAs) representing diverse U.S. marine ecosystems.”

– Identify where major resource groups exist in U.S. MPAs

– Use SPARC tool with spatial resources data to describe representativeness patterns – Compare resource protection

afforded by MPAs

Example 3. Presence/absence of various habitat groups in national system member MPA's in the South Florida/Bahamian Atlantic Ecoregion

National System MPA Barrier

Islands Beach Coral Reef (Tropical) Mangrove

Forests Sand DunesSeamounts

/Pinnacles Sea Grass Submarine

canyons Wetlands/

MudFlatsKelp &

Algae Rivers/ Streams

Biscayne National Park Dry Tortugas National Park

Everglades National Park Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Ten Thousand Islands National Wildlife Refuge Crocodile Lake National Wildlife Refuge Great White Heron National Wildlife Refuge Key West National Wildlife Refuge National Key Deer Wildlife Refuge Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve

TOTAL = 10 1 (10%) 7 (70%) 6 (60%) 9 (90%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%) 7 (70%) 4 (40%) 3 (30%)

(19)

Future Directions:

How protected are MPAs?

• What else do we need to know about MPAS?

– What do MPAs protect?

– Are MPAs addressing threats?

– What level of data is necessary?

• Possible data collection methodologies

– MPA Center review of site regulations

– Survey of MPA program and site managers

(20)

Jordan Gass ([email protected]) Charles Wahle ([email protected])

Hugo Selbie ([email protected])

Questions?

References

Related documents

Fish and Wildlife Service’s Aransas National Wildlife Refuge, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Coastal Fisheries, local chapters of the Coastal Conservation

• Virginia hosts small number of sea turtle nests each year at Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge. Back Bay National

The parks envisaged in this itinerary are the Kaziranga National Park, Hoollongapar Wildlife Sanctuary, Sundarbans National Park, Pench Tiger Reserve and Kanha

Objective: Conduct amateur radio operations from the Balcones Canyonlands National Wildlife Refuge located near Marble Falls, Texas.. The National Wildlife Refuge System is the

Further, staff can explore ways to improve support for distance education students when they enrol (e.g. help to enhance technical skills rather than assuming all students have

fastest women ever competing between 1978 and 2013 in races from Ironman Hawaii to the Double Deca Iron ultra- triathlon, the fastest men were faster than the fastest women for

The PASTURE cohort study was also used to further elucidate potential pathways underlying the observed associations of farming related exposures with allergic

Aerial radio-tracking of Whooping Cranes migrating between Wood Buffalo National Park and Aransas National Wildlife Refuge, 1981–84. Occasional