• No results found

Spirometry Workshop for Primary Care Nurse Practitioners

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Spirometry Workshop for Primary Care Nurse Practitioners"

Copied!
16
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Spirometry Workshop

for Primary Care Nurse

Practitioners

Catherine “Casey” S.

Jones

PhD,

RN, AE-C, ANP-C

Certified Adult Nurse Practitioner

Texas Pulmonary & Critical Care

Consultants P.A.

and

Visiting Assistant Clinical Professor at

Texas Woman’s University - Dallas

Disclosures

No financial relationship with any

pharmaceutical manufacturer or medical device

(2)

Workshop Schedule

n 

1:15 – 2:20 PM – Spirometry introduction

n 

2:20 – 2:50 PM - Hands on spirometry & break

n 

2:50 – 4:30 PM – Case Presentations

Objectives

n 

1. Discuss the indications for performing

spirometry.

n 

2. Describe the correct manner for preparing

both the spirometer and the patient for lung

function testing.

n 

3. Carry out spirometry procedures on self and

other participants.

n 

4. Assess the spirometry tracings with normal,

obstructive & restrictive patterns.

Spirometry

v 

Gold standard for diagnosis of asthma &

COPD

v 

Measure severity & progression of disease

v 

Measure treatment response

v 

Aid in diagnosis of restrictive &

obstructive diseases

v 

Aid in smoking cessation with calculated

(3)

Hazards of Spirometry

v 

Bronchospasm

v 

Cough

v 

Lightheadedness

v 

Syncope

Patient Preparation

v 

Comfortable, loose clothing

v 

Avoid heavy meal within 2 hours

v 

Avoid vigorous exercise within 30 minutes

v 

Use bathroom prior to testing

v 

No short-acting beta agonists for 4 hours

v 

Patient sitting

Prepare the Spirometer

v 

Calibration of the

spirometer

v 

Disposable

(4)

Lung Volume Terminology

Tidal vol

Inspiratory

capacity

Inspiratory

reserve

vol

Expiratory

reserve vol

Vital

capacity

Residual vol

Spirometry Reference Values

n 

NHANES III values for ages 8 - 80

n 

Caucasians

n 

African-Americans

n 

Mexican-Americans

Predicted Values

n 

Large population

studies

n 

AGE

(5)

Predicted Values

n 

GENDER

Predicted Values

n 

HEIGHT

in inches

Predicted Values

n 

RACE

(6)

Ethnic Corrections

n 

Reductions:

n 

African-Americans – 12 to 15 %

n 

South Indians – 13 %

n 

Japanese American – 11 %

n 

Polynesians – 10 %

n 

North Indians & Pakistanis – 10 %

n 

Based on large

population

surveys

n 

Predicted values

are the mean

values obtained

from the survey

Predicted Normal Lung Volumes

80% Mean 120%

Lung Volume Measurements

v 

Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) – maximum

volume of air exhaled from the lungs after a

maximum inspiration.

v 

Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second

(FEV

1

) – volume exhaled during the first

(7)

FEF 25-75%

n 

Forced Expiratory Flow – the flow that occurs

between 25 to 75 % of the FVC

n 

Also called MMEF = maximum mid-expiratory

flow

n 

Represent airflow in medium or small airways

n 

LEAST reliable & controversial

n 

Normal = > 55 % predicted

Normal Lung Volume Values

v 

FEV

1

/FVC: Ratio > 70 %

(> 80 % for children)

v 

FVC: > 80 % predicted

v 

FEV

1

: > 80 % predicted

Disease Patterns

Normal

Obstructed

Restricted

Combined

FEV

1

/

FVC

> 70 %

Down

Normal

Down

FVC

> 80 %

Pred

Normal

Down

Down

FEV

1

> 80 %

Pred

(8)

Obstructive Changes

v 

Asthma

v 

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

v 

Bronchiectasis

v 

Cystic fibrosis

Restrictive Changes

n 

Pulmonary

• 

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

• 

Any interstitial lung disease (over 200

types currently listed)

• 

Pneumonectomy/lobectomy

• 

Pulmonary edema

• 

Rheumatoid arthritis

• 

Sarcoidosis *

• 

Scleroderma

Restrictive Changes

n 

Extra-pulmonary

• 

Thoracic chest wall deformity

§ 

Pectus excavatum

§ 

Kyphoscoliosis

• 

Congestive heart failure

• 

Neuromuscular problems

• 

Obesity

• 

Pregnancy

• 

Poor effort

(9)

Spirometry Tracings

v 

Two basic types of display:

1) 

Flow/volume loop

2) 

Volume/time curve

•  Expiration is the

area that can be

found above the

“waterline”

•  This is the most

important part of

the flow volume

loop in lung

diseases

Flow/Volume Loop

Volume/Time Curve

Liters

*

FEV

1

Seconds

1

FVC

2

3

4

5

6

1

3

4

2

FVC

(10)

Volume-Time

Curve

Normal versus Obstructive & Restrictive

patterns:

flow-volume loop

(11)

Reversibility

n 

Reversibility can be assessed with albuterol

and/ or ipratropium (Atrovent) via MDI

or nebulizer

n 

Reversibility is defined by a change of at

least 12 % post bronchodilator AND an

increase of 200 mL

Examples of Poor Quality

Poor effort/Slow start

Extra breath

Cough

Slow start

Seven Step Spirometry Interpretation

n 

Steps 1 and 2 – Quality Assurance

1. Is the test at least 6 seconds long?

2. Is the flow volume loop the correct shape?

n 

Steps 3-5 – establish the numbers

3. Is the FEV

1

/FVC ratio more or less than 70%

4. Is the FVC more or less than 80% predicted

5. Is the FEV

1

more or less than 80% predicted

n 

Step 6 – identify the pattern

(12)

Quality Assurance

n 

Acceptability criteria (apply first)

n 

Min. 3 acceptable tests, max. 8 attempts

n 

Good start/rapid rise/no hesitation/no

false start

n 

No cough, especially in 1

st

second

n 

No early termination: 6 secs or obvious

plateau

Quality Assurance

n 

Reproducibility

v 

Best two FVC’s within 150 ml of each

other

v 

Best two FEV

1

’s within 150 ml of

each other

n 

Stop if repeated efforts trigger

bronchospasm

Performance of Spirometry

n 

Instruct and demonstrate test to patient

v 

nose clips

v 

Inhale completely

v 

Position mouthpiece

v 

Exhale with maximal force

n 

Position patient

(13)

Classification of Severity-COPD

A defining characteristic of COPD at all levels of severity is

an FEV

1

/FVC ratio of less than 70%.

Stage

GOLD (2014)

I – Mild COPD

With or without chronic symptoms

FEV

1

> 80% predicted

II – Moderate COPD

With or without chronic symptoms

FEV

1

50 – 80% predicted

III – Severe COPD

With or without chronic symptoms

FEV

1

30 – 50% predicted

IV – Very severe COPD

FEV

1

< 30% predicted

Components of Severity

Classification of Asthma Severity (≥12 years of age) Intermittent

Persistent Mild Moderate Severe Impairment Normal FEV1/FVC: 8-19 yr 85% 20-39 yr 80% 40-59 yr 75% 60-80 yr 70%

Symptoms ≤ 2 days/week >2 days/week but not

daily Daily Throughout the day

Nighttime awakenings ≤ 2x/month 3-4x/month >1x/week but not nightly Often 7x/week Short-acting beta2

-agonist use for symptom control (not

prevention of EIB)

≤ 2 days/week >2 days/week but not daily, and not more than 1x on any day

Daily Several times per day

Interference with

normal activity None Minor limitation Some limitation Extremely limited

Lung function

• Normal FEV1 between exacerbations • FEV1 > 80% predicted • FEV1/FVC normal • FEV1 >80% predicted • FEV1/FVC normal • FEV1 >60% but <80% predicted • FEV1/FVC reduced 5% • FEV1< 60% predicted • FEV1/FVC reduced >5% Risk Exacerbations

requiring oral systemic corticosteroids

0-1/year (see note) ≥ 2/year(see note)

Consider severity and interval since last exacerbation. Frequency and severity may fluctuate over time for patients in any severity category

Relative annual risk of exacerbations may be related to FEV1

Recommended Step for Initiating Treatment

Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 or 5

and consider short course of oral systemic corticosteroids In 2-6 weeks, evaluate level of asthma control that is achieved and adjust therapy accordingly

CLASSIFYING ASTHMA SEVERITY AND INITIATING TREATMENT

IN YOUTHS ≥ 12 YEARS OF AGE AND ADULTS

Assessing severity and initiating treatment for patients who are not currently taking long-term control medications

Key: FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC, forced vital capacity; ICU, intensive care unit

Note: At present, there are inadequate data to correspond frequencies of exacerbations with different levels of asthma severity. In general, more frequent and intense exacerbations (e.g. requiring urgent, unscheduled

care, hospitalization, or ICU admission) indicate greater underlying disease severity. For treatment purposes, patients who had ≥ 2 exacerbations requiring oral systemic corticosteroids in the past year may be considered the same as patients who have persistent asthma, even in the absence of impairment levels consistent with persistent asthma.

ASSESSING ASTHMA CONTROL AND ADJUSTING THERAPY IN YOUTH ≥ 12 YEARS OF AGE AND

ADULTS

Components of Control

Classification of Asthma Control ( ≥ 12 years of age) Well Controlled Not Well

Controlled Very Poorly Controlled

Impairment

Symptoms ≤ 2 days/week >2 days/week Throughout the day

Nighttime awakenings ≤ 2x/month 1-3x/week ≥ 4x/week

Interference with normal activity None Some limitation Extremely limited Short-acting beta2-agonist use for

symptom control (not prevention of EIB)

≤ 2 days/week >2 days/week Several times per day

FEV1 or peak flow >80% predicted/

personal best

60-80% predicted/ personal best

<60% predicted/ personal best Validated Questionnaires ATAQ ACQ ACT 0 ≤ 0.75* ≥ 20 1-2 ≥ 1.5 16-19 3-4 N/A ≤ 15 Risk

Exacerbations requiring oral

systemic corticosteroids 0-1/year ≥ 2/year (see note) Progressive loss of lung function Evaluation requires long-term follow-up care. Treatment-related adverse effects Medication side effects can vary in intensity from none to very troublesome and

worrisome. The level of intensity does not correlate to specific levels of control but should be considered in the overall assessment of risk.

Recommended Action for Treatment

• Maintain current step. • Regular follow ups every 1-6 months to maintain control. • Consider step down if well controlled for at least 3 months.

• Step up 1 step and • Reevaluate in 2-6 weeks. • For side effects, consider alternative treatment options.

• Consider short course of oral systemic corticosteroids, • Step up 1-2 steps, and • Reevaluate in 2 weeks. • For side effects, consider alternative treatment options.

*ACQ values of 0.76-1.4 are indeterminate regarding well-controlled asthma.

Key: EIB, exercise-induced bronchospasm; ICU, intensive care unit.

(14)

n 

Insure that demographic data is correct

n 

Remember that weight is not a measured

value – pick your battles.

n 

Measure lung age only with smokers and

prior smokers – it is the most inaccurate

measurement

Review of Basics

1. Spirometry

2. Pre and post bronchodilator

3. Lung volumes – complete testing

4. Diffusing lung capacity – using carbon

monoxide

Modalities of Pulmonary Function Testing

CPT codes

n 

94010 - Simple spirometry, including graphic record,

total & timed VC, expiratory flow rates. No

bronchodilator. Includes 94375.

n 

94060 - Spirometry as with 94010 but with pre/ post

bronchodilation.

(15)

Practice

Time!

References

"

Global Initiative on Chronic

Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD)

http://www.goldcopd.com

"

National Asthma Education and

Prevention Program (NAEPP)

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines

asthma/asthgdln.pdf

References

"

Barreiro, T. & Perillo, I. (2004). An approach to

interpreting spirometry. American Family Physician, 69(5)

1107-1115.

"

Cherniack, R. (1992). Pulmonary Function Testing (2

nd

ed.).

Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.

n 

Feyrouz A., Mehra, R. & Mazzone, P.J. (2003).

Interpreting pulmonary function tests: Recognize the

pattern, and the diagnosis will follow. Cleveland Clinic

(16)

References

"

Hancox, B. & Whyte, K. (2006). Pocket Guide to Lung

Function Tests (2

nd

ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill’s.

"

Hankinson, J.L., Odencrantz, J.R. & Fedan, K.B.

(1999). Spirometric reference values from a sample of

the general U.S. population. American Journal of

Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, 159, 179-187.

"

Lange, N.E., Mulholland, M. & Kreider, M.E. (2009).

Spirometry: Don’t blow it! Chest, 136, 608-614.

References

n 

Wallace, L.D. & Troy, K.E. (2006). Office-based

spirometry for early detection of obstructive lung

disease. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse

Practitioners, 18, 414-421.

Thank you!

References

Related documents

1 Chris Boutieri, Learning in Morocco: Language Politics and the Abandoned Educational Dream (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2016), 1-2. 2 “Maintaining Momentum

The Galileo test area Saxony-Anhalt is based on the initiative of the state “Applied Transport Research/Galileo Transport” and is the future center of excellence of the federal

Research various national costumes/outfits from different countries around the world. Can you use craft materials from around your house to recreate a costume of your choice? You

IEC collaborates closely with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in accordance with conditions determined by agreement between the two organizations. 2)

of C&amp;V, the coupled shape prior, and the synergy of coupled shape prior and relative pose prior based methods in Figs. We compare the segmentation results of the three methods

Corporations Act Regulation (General) , R.R.O.. organizations are created equal, and as such Canadian law provides four different legal structures for nonprofit

Figure 14 shows that when the iterative formulation of Equation (20) is used to simulate the processes of the decrement of iterative trust and reputation, the total trust of

My focus for this research was an attempt to explore the current challenges around teacher development in South Africa, and to explore the notion of practice theory and the