• No results found

HADNOUT E.13 - EXAMPLES ON TRANSFER FUNCTIONS, POLES AND ZEROS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "HADNOUT E.13 - EXAMPLES ON TRANSFER FUNCTIONS, POLES AND ZEROS"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

HADNOUT E.13 - EXAMPLES ON TRANSFER FUNCTIONS, POLES

AND ZEROS

Example 1

Determine the transfer function of the mass-spring-damper system.

The governing differential equation of a mass-spring-damper system is given by . . .. F kx x c x m + + =

Taking the Laplace transforms of the above equation (assuming zero initial conditions), we have . 1 ) ( ) ( ), ( ) ( ) ( ) ( 2 2 k cs ms s F s X s F s kX s csX s X ms + + = ⇒ = + + (1)

Equation (1) represents the transfer function of the mass-spring-damper system. Example 2

Consider the system given by the differential equation ), ( 2 3 4 . .. t r y y

y+ + = where r(t) is the input to the system. Assume zero initial conditions. The Laplace transforms yields,

. 3 4 2 ) ( ) ( ), ( 2 ) ( 3 ) ( 4 ) ( 2 2 + + = ⇒ = + + s s s R s Y s R s Y s sY s Y s (2) Equation (2) represents the transfer function of the system.

Example 3

Find the solution of the differential equation , 0 ) ( ) ( .. = +y t t y where y(0)=α and y.(0)= β.

The Laplace transform of the above differential equation gives,

. ) ( , 0 ) ( ) ( 2 + = ⇒ = + − − s s Y s Y s s Y s β α β α

(2)

Lecture 13 August 22, 2001 After looking up in the transform tables, the two terms in the right side of the above equation, we get ). sin( ) cos( ) (t t t y =α +β Example 4

Consider a RLC circuit. The governing differential equation is given by . 1 V idt C Ri dt di L + +

= (3) But, . dt dq i=

Therefore, equation (3) reduces to . 1 2 2 V q C dt dq R dt q d L + + =

The Laplace transforms of the above equation yields

. 1 1 ) ( ) ( ), ( ) ( 1 ) ( ) ( 2 2 C Rs Ls s V s Q s V s Q C s RsQ s Q Ls + + = ⇒ = + +

The above equation represents the transfer function of a RLC circuit. Example 5

Determine the poles and zeros of the system whose transfer function is given by . 2 3 1 2 ) ( 2 + + + = s s s s G

The zeros of the system can be obtained by equating the numerator of the transfer function to zero, i.e.,

(3)

. 2 1 , 0 1 2 − = ⇒ = + s s

The poles of the system can be obtained by equating the denominator of the transfer function to zero, i.e.,

. 2 , 1 , 0 ) 2 )( 1 ( , 0 2 3 2 − = − = ⇒ = + + ⇒ = + + s s s s s s

Therefore s = -1 and s = -2 are the poles of the system and s = -1/2 is the zero of the system.

Example 6

Determine the poles and zeros of the system, whose transfer function is given by . ) 13 4 ( ) 6 ( 30 ) ( 2 + + − = s s s s s H

The zeros of the system are given by

. 6 , 0 ) 6 ( 30 = ⇒ = − s s

Therefore s = 6 is the zero of the system. The poles of the system are given by

. 3 2 , 3 2 , 0 , 2 6 4 , 2 6 4 , 0 , 2 52 16 4 , 0 , 0 13 4 , 0 , 0 ) 13 4 ( 2 2 i s i s s i s i s s s s s s s s s s − − = + − = = ⇒ − − = + − = = ⇒ − ± − = = ⇒ = + + = ⇒ = + +

(4)

Lecture 13 August 22, 2001 Example 7

Consider the mass-spring-damper system. The governing differential equation of motion for the system is given by

. . .. F kx x c x m + + = (4)

Let the states of the system be defined as

. , 2 . 1 x x x x = = (5)

From the above relation, it can be concluded that . 2 1 . x x = (6)

Substituting the relations given by equation (5) in equation (4), we get

, , 1 2 2 . . .. F kx cx x m F kx x c x m = + + ⇒ = + + . 1 2 1 2 . F m x m c x m k x =− − + ⇒ (7)

Representing equations (6) and (7) in matrix format, we have . 1 0 1 0 2 1 2 .1 . F m x x m c m k x x         +               − − =         (8)

If the output of the system is the velocity of the mass, then writing the output relation in matrix format, we get

, 2 . x x y = =

[ ]

0 1 . 2 1       = ⇒ x x y (9)

Equations (8) and (9) represent the state-space representation of the mass-spring-damper system.

Obtaining the transfer function from the state-space representation

(5)

. ) ( ) (s =C sIA −1B+D G

From equation (8), the transfer function can be written as

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

10 1 10 , 1 1 1 0 ) ( , 1 0 1 1 0 ) ( , 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 ) ( 1 1            − +       + =                     − + +       + = ⇒                 + − = ⇒                         − − −       = − − m s m k m k m c s s m s m km c s m k m c s s s G m m c s m ks s G m m c m k s s G . ) ( 2 2 k cs s s m s k cs ms m s G + + =       + + = ⇒ (10)

Equation (10) represents the transfer function of the system, wherein the input to the system is the force applied to the system and the output of the system is the velocity of the mass.

Example 8

Find the transfer function for the block diagram shown below.

Sol: Note that there are two negative feedback loop and one positive feed-forward loop. Reducing the negative feedback loops, we get

(6)

Lecture 13 August 22, 2001

The above diagram can be further reduced to

(7)

Assignment

1) Determine the transfer functions for the following systems, whose differential equations are given by

. , . . .. θ θ θ e a a a a T K v Ri dt di L i K B J − = + = +

The input to the system is the voltage, ‘va’, whereas the output is the angle ‘θ’.

2) Determine the poles and zeros of the system whose transfer functions are given by

. ) 32 2 )( 8 ( ) 6 5 ( ) ( ) ) 36 )( 3 ( ) 25 )( 10 ( ) ( ) 2 2 2 2 2 + + + + + = + + + + + + = s s s s s s H b s s s s s s s s G a

3) Obtain the state-space representation of the system whose differential equation is given by the equation given in example 2.

References

Related documents

Report Senate Amendment 1 adoption, Ayes 5, Noes 0, Senate Amendment 2 adoption, Ayes 5, Noes 0, passage as amended recommended by committee on Transportation and Veterans

Choose a border style for the link label The user chooses exactly one radio button. from each group – one to choose the president and one to choose the border

Unlike in metaphosphate glasses, the variation of kinetic fragility and Doremus ratio with composition seems to be influenced by the higher proportion of chains that

20,43 The covalently immobilized cell adhesion ligands PEG-RGDS, PEG-IKVAV, and PEG-YIGSR have differing effects on tubule formation when presented to endothelial and pericyte

Assuming that all close consan- guineal family members born in one’s municipality benefit from these connections, we estimate a return to holding political office on the order of

a transposed design matrix, which turns out to be a necessary and sufficient condition for the standard ` 1 -minimization method to be weakly stable in sparse data reconstruction..

Urata, “Effect of hydrogen addition to intake gas on combustion and exhaust emission characteristics of a diesel engine,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,

Posterior Instrumentation, Aspen™ Spinous Process System Versus Pedicle Screw Fixation, in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF) or Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF). 144