studies may allow a clearer designation of
tile frequencies of the various antecedent
events. Through such analysis appropriate
pre’enti’e measures can be more rationally
chosen and better direction given to
fol-low-up research. The prevention of falls in
infants, our most precious and important
national resource, merits greater attention
and effort by the medical profession and by
all organizations interested in the welfare
of infants.
Acknowledgment
This investigation was supported by the Na-tional Safety Council, Exploratory Research Grant
70502-03. We wish to acknowledge the help of
John Cvwinski, M.D., Adolph A. Sattler, M.D.,
Raymond Lesser, M.D., Bernard Sered, M.D., Judy
Mitchell, RN., Sharon Wordell, IN., Diana Kova-cic, IN., and Mrs. Darla Strouse.
REFERENCES
1. Ingraham, F. C., and Matson, D. D.: Subdural
hematonia in infancy. J. Pediat., 24:1, 1944.
2. Lowrev, C. H.: The problem of hospital
acci-dents in children. PEDIATRICS 32:1064, 1963.
3. llarwood-Nash, D.C., Henrich, E. B., and Hus-son, A. R.: Statistical Analysis of 4,463 Cases
of Head Trauma Seen at the Hospital for
Sick Children. Presented before the Canadian
Association of Radiologists, Toronto, June,
1967.
4. Bender, L., and Schilder, P.: Psychopathology of Children with Organic Brain Disorders. Springfield: Charles C Thomas, p. 85, 1956. 5. Hurlock, E.: Developmental Psychology. New
York: McGraw-Hill, p. 36, 1953.
6. Feinberg, S.: An infant scale guard. J. Pediat.
70:441, 1967.
7. Recht, J.: Systems Safety Analysis: A Modern
Approach to Safety Problems. Chicago: Na-tional Safety Council, 1967.
NEEDS
AND
OBJECTIVES
FOR
A
NATIONAL
PROGRAM
ON
CHILD
SAFETY
Prepared by Home Department, National Safety Council, Chicago, Illinois
M
ANY organizations and agencies on thenational, state, and local level have
long been actively concerned and involved
in child-accident prevention programs.
However, no definitive statement of the
overall needs and objectives of such efforts
has ever been developed. Lacking such a
‘l)lueprint, many activities have suffered
from lack of direction and failure to
com-prehend tile total piettire.
In an attempt to correct this situation,
this statement has been prepared by the
National Safety Council’s Home
Depart-ment. As will be noted, we are not
en-deavoring to suggest how some of these
objectives will be achieved, nor who should
assume the responsibility for their
accom-plishment. Such problems will, of necessity,
be solved only through careful and
consid-ered deliberation by all parties concerned.
This statement is intended to serve as a
guide for all organizations concerned with
the needless toll of lives and injuries caused
by accidents to the children of our nation.
No single organization can hope to
under-take-much less solve-all the needs which
have been delineated herein. Responsibility
for the various objectives must be assumed
by those organizations which are most
logi-cally in a position to undertake appropriate
action. In many cases it will require the
combined facilities and talents of many
groups.
THE CHALLENGE
For children aged 1 to 14 years,
acci-dents claim more lives than the six leading
diseases combined. In 1966 it was reported
that 16,500 children ages 0 to 14 years, lost their lives through accidents. Seven
thou-sand one hundred of these accidents
oc-curred in the home and 6,100 were caused
through motor vehicle accidents. The
SUPPLEMENT
places, with the majority of these being
drownings. No nation can stand idly by and
permit its future strength to be dissipated
in this manner.
THE JOB TO BE DONE
It is unanimously agreed that the
reduc-tion of child accidents and deaths requires
a colossal effort. It cannot be done unless it
has the organized support of informed
citi-zens. Unfortunately, over the years, too
much of this support has been nominal. A
coordinated effort is needed to assure that
all forces work toward the same ends with
a minimum of friction and duplication of
effort. It will niake possible an achievement
far greater that the sum of the individual
efforts.
Research
Valid and practical child safety research
is fundamental to the prevention of
acci-dental injuries and reduction of the severity
of these accidents. Research can point out
critical accident situations requiring
atten-tion and develop new techniques for
lower-ing accidental potential. It can evaluate the
results of programs. It can demonstrate
which of several alternative methods is
most effective or economical.
To date too few research projects have
focused on accidents to children; and still
fewer of these studies have achieved their
goals. Continued progress in child-accident
reduction, therefore, calls for increased and
improved research.
OBJECTIVES-To encourage increased and
improved research it is recommended that:
1. Research activities on child-accident
prevention be coordinated on a national
basis.
2. Colleges and universities be
encour-aged to utilize their research facilities
to-ward solving the child-accident problem.
3. Programs be established for the
train-ing of researchers to specialize in
child-ac-cident control.
4. Appropriate research be undertaken
by all levels of major departments of
gov-ernment having responsibilities relating to
child-accident prevention.
5. Appropriate research be undertaken
by industry, professional groups and
volun-tary agencies having interests in or related
to child accident prevention.
6. Current child safety research
periodi-cally be evaluated and the findings compiled
and disseminated. Guides be developed
which contain suggestions for the
applica-tion of this knowledge.
7. Public and private grants and
con-tracts for basic and operational research be
increased.
8. Research results be publicized in
order to develop public appreciation and
support of further research.
Child Accident Data
Reliable child accident statistics and
ef-fective accident prevention programs are
inseparable. Without statistical records,
safety efforts are likely to be based largely
on opinion and guesswork.
A basic need exists for valid, reliable,
comprehensive, and continual
accidental-in-jury information. Scientific administration
requires such data for surveillance, research
and program evaluation. At present,
child-accident statistics are incomplete and
diffi-cult to utilize. Child-accident death reports
forwarded from state offices of vital
statis-tics are accumulated and tabulated by the
National Center for Health Statistics,
United States Public Health Service.
How-ever, these reports are not uniform and the
information is frequently unreliable for
pro-gram planning purposes. Further, a severe
time lag exists from the raw data phase to
the finished product.
Nonfatal statistics of poisoning incidence
are compiled on a sampling basis by the
National Clearinghouse for Poison Control
Centers, United States Public Health
Ser-vice; and nonfatal-accident statistics are
compiled from special studies of the
Na-tional Health Survey, conducted at periodic
intervals by the National Center for Health
Statistics, United States Public Health
Ser-vice. These sources cannot gather complete
they do provide guidance for solving some aspects of tile child-accident problem.
OBJ ECTIVES-TO encourage improved ac-cident statistics it is recommended that:
1. The “standard certificate of death” be
adopted by reference in all states. The
stan-dard certificate should be coded for
elec-tronic data processing
(
EDP)
to reduce thetime lag now required to process all state
certificates at the National Center for
Health Statistics.
2. NIore detailed information be
col-lected consistently on nonfatal child
acci-dents by appropriate groups such as the
National Center for Health Statistics, the
National Clearinghouse for Poison Control
Centers, and the United States Public
Health Service regional medical centers.
3. Hospitals and the medical profession
i)e encouraged to provide basic statistical
data on nonfatal child accident cases.
4. The methodology of all child accident
data collection be scientifically designed to
assure the validity and reliability of the
findings.
Public Information
Basic to the success of child-accident
prevention programs is public awareness of
the problem. Therein lies the target of
pul)lic information programs. Public
infor-mation must be an integral part of any child safety program. It is not, however, the
entire program and cannot be substituted
for other essential accident-prevention
mea-sures. Public information specialists can
de-velop the understanding and support of
civic leaders for the many elements of a
balanced child safety program.
In order for child safety information to
be meaningful, it must deal with local
ac-tivities and appeal to local interests. Local
questions which need to be answered are:
How serious is tile problem? \Vho is
af-fected? \\7hat is the cost to the taxpayers
and individual families in terms of
prop-erty, social problems, suffering and death?
OBJECTIVES-TO improve public
informa-tion it is recommended that:
1. Public inforniation programs be
di-rected toward-
(
a)
informing the publicabout child accidents; their number, where
and how they occur, and why,
(
b)
contin-ually emphasizing the need for individual
responsibility, and
(
c) defining andex-plaining local measures taken to control
child accidents and encouraging support of
these efforts.
2. Public information programs
(
a)
bekeyed to the specific child safety needs and
coordinated with the local child safety
pro-gram,
(
b)
be continuous,(
c)
utilize thetechniques of tinieliness, newsworthiness,
human appeal, and reader interest
(
andother nierchandismg techniques
)
whichhave been so successfully developed by the
mass niedia, and
(
d)
utilize specialempha-sis programs such as Poison Prevention
Week and Fire Prevention Week.
3. Official agencies with child safety
re-sponsibilities, such as health, welfare, fire
and police departments, make pertinent
facts about child safety available to the
public, in cooperation with the mass media
and interested supporting organizations.
4. The public information profession in
active cooperation with each other, as vell
as with public officials and interested
orga-nizations, join in organized efforts to
dis-seminate information in support of
child-ac-cident prevention.
5. All agencies and organizations employ or utilize competent personnel to promote
child safety through all public information
channels.
Educational Programs
It should be obvious that if we are to
achieve a reduction in the number and
se-verity of child accidents, our educational
efforts must ultimately reach into every community. Unfortunately, there are many
obstacles to achieving this goal. Among of-ficial agencies at the state and local levels,
child-safety activities are often fragmented
by departmental responsibilities of the fire,
health, welfare, and police departments.
Because of this division of responsibility
and activity, these programs frequently
Likewise, relatively few public and
non-public school districts employ full-time
safety education supervisors or provide
their staffs vith adequate safety curriculuni
guides. Even where such guidance is
avail-able, school officials often admit that little
is known of the quantity or quality of the
instruction. Likewise, comparatively few
school systems maintain adequate
student-accident statistics to measure the progress
-or lack of progress-which the educational
programs are making.
Only in recent years have business and
industry realized that it is economically
ad-vantageous to conduct off-the-job stafety
ac-tivities for employees and their families.
However, the number of employees reached
by such programs still represents only a small
percentage of this nation’s employed
popu-lation and the number of such programs
concerned with any aspects of child safety
in minuscule.
Finally, many national, state, and local
organizations concerned with safety have
programmed child safety on a continuing
basis. However, where such activities are
undertaken, duplication of effort frequently
occurs on the community level because of a lack of coordination.
OBJECTIVES-TO improve citizen
educa-tion it is recommended that:
1. Child safety programming efforts on
all levels (a) be proportionate to the total
accident problem, (b) involve all
appropri-ate organizations and agencies, and (c) be
coordinated so that needless gaps or
dupli-cations are eliminated and the maximum
ef-fectiveness achieved.
2. Organizations and agencies operating
at the national level (civic, business, and
government) develop child safety programs on a continuing basis to stimulate their
state and local counterparts.
3. State and local organizations develop their programs of child safety to stimulate the public to action.
4. Funds be sought at all levels (national, state, and local) to carry out child safety educational programs.
5. Evaluation and reevaluation he
con-ducted periodically at all levels to determine
if programming efforts are proportionate to
the need and whether effective results are
being achieved.
6. School districts
(
a)
seek to employfull-time safety education supervisors
(
b)1)rovide emphasis on child safety in all
ap-propriate courses of study, and
(
c)
adopt a24 hour-a-day student accident reporting
system and regularly analyze such reports
as the basis for their safety education
em-phasis.
7. Business and industry increase the
cx-tent to which off-the-job safety programs
include child safety and are effectively
car-ned out.
Environment
A child’s environment encompasses a
multi-tude of areas-clothing, toys, drugs, food,
furnishings, and a host of other consumer
products. The safety of a number of these
products is partially controlled by federal,
state, and local laws, such as those that
per-tam to foods, drugs, cosmetics and, to some
extent, clothing. The pressure to provide
more safety in equipment and products not
currently covered by voluntary product safety standards or laws is evident.
The environment of the child is also
af-fected by voluntary standards and, to some
degree, by those who manufacture these
products.
In addition, the family exercises a degree
of safety control in its selection of the
home, equipment and products it
pur-chases, the proper maintenance it provides,
and tile degree of discipline it achieves in
its family life.
OBJECTIVES-TO achieve a safer
environ-ment for the child it is recommended that:
1. Adequate guides be provided for fani-ilies to assist them in the purchase of safe
and hazard free products and equipment.
Special attention should be given to the
manufacturers recommendations and the
significance of recognized labels, such as
those of Underwriters’ Laboratories and the
American Gas Association.
re-HOW
SAFE
IS PUPIL
TRANSPORTATION?
Seymour Charles, M.D., and Annemarie Shelness
Abstract of a study of school bus laws, regulations and practices in the United States, conducted by
sponsibility and moral obligation for the
welfare of children by being encouraged
to :
(
a)
comply vith existing voluntarysafety standards,
(
b)
assume a stature ofresponsibility for producing safe consumer
products,
(
c)
where no standard exists,take the initiative in voluntarily developing
safety standards for their products, based
on research and statistical data,
(
d)
takethe initiative in forniulating labeling
com-pacts and sponsoring consumer education
progranis for products requiring special at-tention for safe use and storage.
3. \\There industry fails to provide
rca-sonable safety for the consumer, the need
for legislation should he considered.
SUMMARY
This statement is presented as a
nation-wide systems approach for controlling
acci-dental injuries and deaths to children. Basic
to the program outlined herein is the need
for more knowledge concerning the causes
the Physicians for Automotive Safet
W
HILE the American school bus isclaimed to be the safest form of
pas-senger transportation, a recent survey of
ac-cident rates and hazards revealed by the
Physicians for Automotive Safety (PAS)
in-dicated substantial deficiencies in school-bus safety. Individual states reported a con-fusing disparity in safety regulations; no
state possessed an optimal situation. No
uniform national standards for the medical
qualification, selection, training, and
super-vision of bus drivers exist. Existing
scien-tific knowledge concerning safety, like that
reported i)\’ the University of California at
Los Angeles Institute of Traffic and
Trans-portation’s study on school bus collisions,
1) have not been widely applied for pupil
and effects of these accidents. Facts are a
prime requisite to all other proposed mea-sures. Valid research and statistics will
throw light on what is now only educated
guesswork.
Increased and accurate data on all
as-pects of the child-accident probleni vill
en-able comprehensive public information and
education programs to determine priorities
and achieve their goals.
A safer environment for the child can be
achieved more rapidly, and with greater
ef-fectiveness, by pinpointing the problems
and eliminating the hazards. Likewise,
haz-ards can be controlled by consumer
prod-net-safety programs, and good maintenance
and discipline within the family.
The program proposed in this paper can
be a vital, strong, and worthwhile systeni if
it receives coordinated, sustained and
will-ing support-or, it can be just another good
plan, the victim of token support and
frac-tional effort. The choice is ours to make.
and driver protection. The collision
experi-ments with anthropometric dummies as
“passengers” were set up to establish the
feasibility of using seat belts or other
re-straining devices for youngsters in school
buses. The findings cover these and many
other aspects of vehicle design. Some of the
recommendations are: seat backs should be raised to a height of 28 inches; seat backs must have effective padding on the
rear panels and strong, well-padded arm
rests; seat belts should be provided for all
passengers but only in combination with the safety seats described above; drivers of school buses should wear seat belts; seats
must be anchored securely to the floor to