MICHELANGELO
A3A
8CULFTOR
MASTERS
IN
ART
A
SERIES
OF
ILLUSTRATED
MONOGRAPHS:
ISSUED
MONTHLY
PART
16
APRIL,
1901
VOLUME
2
$ a
CONTENTS
PLATEI. PLATEII. PLATE III. PLATE IV. PLATEV. PLATE VI. PLATE VII. DAVID PiETAMADONNA
AND CHILDBOUND
CAPTIVEMADONNA
AND CHILDTOMB
OFLORENZO DE' MEDICIACADEMY:
FLORENCEST. PETER'S:
ROME
NATIONALMUSEUM:
FLORENCE LOUVRE: PARISCHURCH
OFNOTRE DAME:
BRUGESSACRISTY OF SANLORENZO: FLORENCE
:!LPENSIEROSO'
(TOMB
OFLORENZO DE' MEDICI)SACRISTY OF SAN LORENZO: FLORENCE PLATEVIII. MOSES
CHURCH
OFSAN PIETROIN VINCOLI:ROME
PLATEIX.TOMB
OF GIULIANO DE' MEDICI SACRISTY OF SANLORENZO: FLORENCE PLATEX. GIULIANODE' MEDICI(Tomb
of Giuliano de' Medici)SACRISTY OFSAN LORENZO: FLORENCE PORTRAITOF MICHELANGELO, FROM A
MEDAL
BYLEONELEONI: SOUTH KENSINGTONMU-SEUM:
LONDON
PAGE 20THE
LIFE OFMICHELANGELO PAGE 21 J. A. SYMONDSTHE
ART
OF MICHELANGELO PAGE 28CRITICISMSBY PERKINS, GUILLAUME,REYMOND, LUBKE
THE WORKS
OFMICHELANGELO.IN SCULPTURE: DESCRIPTIONS OFTHE PLATESAND ALISTOFSCULPTURES PAGE 34
Photo-EngravingsbySuffolkEngraving Company:Boston. Priss-worktjrtbtEvtrtttPrtss: Boston.
PUBLISHERS'
ANNOUNCEMENTS
SUBSCRIPTIONS:
Subscriptionprice, $1.50ayear, in advance, postpaid to anyaddressin the United Statesor Canada: to foreign countriesin the Postal Union, $2.00. Single copies, 15cents. Subscriptions may begin with any issue,butaseachyearlyvolume ofthemagazinecommenceswiththeJanuary number, andasindex-pages, bindings,etc.,are preparedforcompletevolumes, intendingsubscribers areadvised to datetheir
subscriptionsfromJanuary.
REMITTANCES
: Remittancesmaybe madebyPost Office money-order, bank cheque, express order, orinpost-age stamps. Currencysentbymailusuallycomessafely,but should be securelywrapped, andisattheriskofthe sender.
CHANGES OF ADDRESS
: Whenachange ofaddressisdesired,boththe old and the newaddresses should be given,andnoticeofthechangeshould reachthis officenotlaterthanthefifteenthof themonth to affectthe succeedingissue. Thepublisherscannotberesponsiblefor copies lostthroughfailureto notifythemof suchchanges.
BOUND VOLUMES AND
BINDINGS
: Volume I., containing Parts I to j.2inclusive, bound in brown buckramwith giltstamps andgilttop, $3.00, postpaid; boundingi"ee/i*.half-morocco, yilttop,$3.50, postpaid. Sub-scribers'copiesofVolumeI. willbeboundto order in buckram, wirhgilf-stampsarid gilttop, for $1.50; or in
half-morocco, gilttop, for$2.00. Indexesandhalf-titles forbindingVolumeI.
suppliedonipplication.
BATES
&
GUILD COMPANY,
PUBLISHERS
42
CHAUNCY
STREET,
BOSTON,
MASS.
MASTERS
IN
ART
Bovmd
Volumes
*f
MASTERS
IN
ART
for
1901
WASTE INAK: IIHANMASTE1
JRVELASQJfEZ r-hlN'/IFull
Cloth. postpaid,$3.00
Goldletteringandgilttop; brownbuckram.
Subscribers' copiesboundinthis style for $1.50.
Ha.lf
Morocco
(green) postpaid,$3.50
Goldletteringandgilttop.
Subscribers' copiesboundinthis style for $2.00.
Bates
&
Guild
Company,
Boston
of
Bratoing
anti
fainting
MUSEUM
OF FINE
ARTS,
BOSTON, MASS.
E. c.
TARBELL,
F.w.
BENSON, andPHILIP HALE, Drawingand Painting B. L.
PRATT,
ModellingMrs.
WM.
STONE, DecorativeDesign E.W. EMERSON,
Anatomy A. K. CROSS, Perspective Twenty-fifth yearnow open.FreeuseofMuseumgalleries. PaigeForeign Scholarship formenand women. Helen HamblenScholarship. Ten FreeScholarships. Six prizes inmoney. Forcircularsand termsaddress
Miss EmilyDanforth Norcross, Manager
c
of
THIRD
YEAR,OCT. i, 1900,TO JUNEi,1901.HeadInstructorand Director,
ERIC
PAPE,
Painterand Illustrator. NoExaminationsforAdmission.Drawing andPaintingfromlife,separate classesformenandwomen.
Portraiture,StillLife,Water-color,Pastel,Pyrogravure,Wood-carving, Composition, andDecorativeDesign.
Illustration, with costume models,Pen,Wash,Gouache, Poster and Book-coverdesigning.DecorativeIllumination forbooks.
EveningLifeandIllustrationClassformen,7 to 10P.M. Scholarships, Medals,andPrizes,
Forcircularsandallinformationaddress
H.JARVISPECK,Secretary,
Corner Massachusetts Ave.and BoylstonSt.,Boston, Mass.
3rt
gcatiemp
of
Cincinnati
Endowments, $393,00x3. Tuition Fee, $20.
DRAWING
AND
PAINTING
FiveLife Classes: FRANK DUVENECK, T. S. Noble, V. Nowottny, L. H. Meakin, and J. H. SharpMODELLING
: C. J. BarnhornCARVING
:W.
H. FryAlsoPreparatoryandother Classes
33d
year
: Sept.24, 1900, toMay
25,1901AND
SUMMER
TERM
OF
10WEEKS
FROM
JUNE
18 Forcirculars writeA.T.
GOSHORN,Director, Cincinnatifemale
for goun0
Situated in themountains ofVirginia. Preparatory andelectivecourses.
Music,Art, Languages, andElocution,specialties. Fifty-seventh ses-sionbeginsSeptember13. Writeforcatalogue.
Miss
MARIA
PENDLETON
DUVAL,Prin.,Staunton, Va. SuccessortoMrs.Gen.J.E.B. Stuart.COMMERCIAL DRAWING TAUGHT
5y C<r>i-r-e>Hr>oM.clon.oc>.
WefitthestudentforworkinNewspaper,Lithographing. ngravingandother Establishments, or the Studio. The profession ishighlyprofitable,and thedemandforcompetent educated artistsispracticallyunlimited.
PRACTICALdrawingtaughtbyPRACTICAL
methods." Writefor furtherinformation.
MASTERS
IN
ART
01.
$
1.
Sloanc
We
invite particular attention
to
our
Sprirvg
Assortnvervt
CARPETINGS
It
embraces
a
most
comprehensive
variety
in
plain
and
figured
Imported
Fabrics;
the
well-known
SMITH
WIL-TON
VELVETS,
SAVONNERIES, AXMINSTERS,
and
MOQUETTES,
and
the celebrated
BIGELOW
WILTON,
BRUSSELS,
and
AXMINSTER
Carpets, especially
suit-able
for
COUNTRY
HOUSES.
Orders placed
now
for
WHOLE
CARPETS
Will
be ready
for
delivery
in
the
autumn.
These
handsome
floor-coverings are
hand-woven
to
match any
design
and
coloring that
may
be
desired.
Correspondence
invited.
Broadway
and
Wb
Street
new
Vork
^^^^^^^^^^MHI^^^^MM^^^^^MM^^^^^^MMH^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^B^^^H^HVBBiM^^^^^^^H^^^^^^^^^HMM^^^M^^^^^^^^^^MH^MHMM
/V/3/
'6
?
/MASTFRSIXAHT PLATEI
MICHELANGELO DAVID ACADEMY, FLOHENCE
MASTKKS I.V AUT PLATE II
MICHELANGELO
PIETA
ASTERS IXAKT PLATEIII PHOTOGRAPHBY ALINARI
MICHELANGELO
MADONNA AND
CHILDRASTERSINAKT PLATErv
PHOTOGRAPHBYBRAUN, CLEMENT ACIE.
BOUND
CAPTIVE
ASTERS TXABT PLATEV
MICHELANGELO
MADONNA AND
CHILDMASTKHSIK"AHT PLATEVI
MICHELANGELO TOMBOF LOHEXZODE'MEDICI
IL JPEXSIF.KOSO, TWILIGHT,
DAWN
SACRISTY OFSAX LOKEXZO,FLOKEXCErr
HASTEHS INART PLATEVII
PHOTOGRAPH BY AL.NARI
MICHELA3fGELO
IL PEJVSIEKOSO
TOMBOKX.OKENZODE? MEDICI SAGKISTY OP SAXLOKEJSTZO,FLORENCE
MASTKKS ixAHT PLATE viu
PHOTOGRAPH 8V ANDERSON
MJCHELAXGEL.O
MOSES
MASTERSIK-AHT PLATEIX
MICHELAXGELO TOMBOFGIUUAirO DE'MELIIC1
GUTLIAXOIJE' MKDICI, NIGHT,
DAY
MASTERS IXAKT PLATEX
MICHEr.AXGEL.O
GIULIAXOBE'MEDICI
TOMJ1OFGrtLLIAXO BE'MEDJCI SACRISTY OF SAXLOREXZO, FLOKEJJCE
MICHKf.AXUELiO MEDAL,IXSILVKK SOUTH KKXS1XGTOX
M
USEUM.LOXDOXProbably themost genuine contemporaryportraitof Michelangeloisthe medal,showing
hisprofile,byhiswarmfriend,the sculptorLeoneLeoni. Itseemscertainthatthismedal
was cast in 1560, when Michelangelo waseighty-fiveyearsold,and therefore thatthe
inscription"yErs. ANN. 88
"
isan error. Condivi describes Michelangeloat seventy-nine, asofmiddle height,withbroad shoulders, thinlegs, a facesmallinproportionto his
head, a nose broken from a blow "from that beastly and proud man Torrigiano de'
Torrigiani," thin lips,small, evervarying grayeyes,black hair,and thinforked beard
M ASTERS
IN
ART
BORN
1475:
DIED
1564
FLORENTINE SCHOOL
In this issueonly Michelangelo's works in sculpture are illustrated. His achievements inpaintingwillbe considered inthenextnumberofthisSERIES.
JOHN
ADDINGTON
SYMONDS
'RENAISSANCE IN ITALY'MICHELANGELO
was
born in 1475, at Caprese,where
his father,Lodovico,held theofficeofpodesta. Hisancestry
was
honorable; theBuonarroti
even
claimed descent, but apparently without due reason,from
theprincelyhouse of Canossa. His
mother
gavehim
tobe nursedby
astone-cutter'swife at
Settignano, so that in after-days he used to say that he had
drawn
in the love ofchisels and mallets with his nurse's milk.As
he grew,theboy
developed aninvincible determinationtowardthearts.Lodovico,
from
motives ofprideand
prudence,opposedhiswishes,butwith-out success,
and
at last Michelangelo induced his father to sign articlesapprenticing
him
to the painterDomenico
Ghirlandajo. In Ghirlandajo'sworkshop
he learned the rudiments of art, helping in the execution of thefrescos at Santa
Maria
Novella, until such time as the pupil proved hissu-periority as a draughtsman to his teacher.
After leaving Ghirlandajo's bottega, at the age of sixteen, Michelangelo procured an introduction to the Medici, and frequented thosegardens of San
Marco
where Lorenzo
de'Medici
had placed his collection of antiquities.There
theyouthdiscovered his vocation.Having
begged a pieceof marble and a chisel,he struckouta P'aun'smask.One
is stillshown
intheBargelloas his work. It is
worth
noticing that Michelangeloseems
to havedone no
merely prentice work.Not
a fragment of his laborfrom
the earliest to thelatest
was
insignificant.There was
nothingtentative in hisgenius. Intoart, asinto a rich land, hecame
and
conquered. . . .Lorenzo
de'Medici
discernedin Michelangeloa youth ofeminent
genius, and took the lad into hisown
household.The
astonished father foundhim-self suddenly provided with a comfortable post
and
courted for the sake ofthe
young
sculptor. In Lorenzo's palace therealeducation ofMichelangelo began.He
sat atthesame
table with Ficino, Pico,and
Poliziano, listeningto dialogues on Plato and drinking in the golden
.
22
4Ha3tcrrf
in
art
2*i
H
** !v
JP ill .-ex r ivT >-^
same
time he heardthe preaching ofSavonarola.Another
portionofhis soulwas
touched,and
he acquired that deepreligioustone
which
givesitsmajestyand terror tothe Sistine.
While
Michelangelowas
thus engaged instudying antique sculpture
and
inlistening to Picoand Savonarola,he carved his first bas-relief, a'Battle of Hercules with the Centaurs.'
Meantime
Lorenzo
died. His successor, Piero, set theyoung man,
it is said, tomodel
asnow
statue,and
then melted like a shape ofsnow
himselfdown
from
his pedestal ofpower
in Florence.Upon
the expulsion of the tyrantand
the proclamation ofthenew
republic itwas
dangerous for
house-friends of the
Medici
to be seen in the city. Michelangelo thereforemade
his
way
to Bologna,where
he spentsome
months
in the palace ofGian
Francesco Aldovrandini,studying Dante,
and working
at an angel- for theshrine ofSt.
Dominic.
As
soon, however, as itseemed
safe to do so, hereturned to Florence;
and
to this period belongs the lost statue of the'Sleeping Cupid,'
which was
sold as an antique to the Cardinal RafFaelloRiario.
A
dispute about the price ofthis'
Cupid
'
took Michelangelo,in 1496, to
Rome,
where
itwas
destined that the greater portion ofhis life should be spentand
hisnoblestworks
ofart should be produced. Here, whiletheBor-gias
were
turning the Vatican into a den ofthievesand
harlots,he executedthe purest of all his statues, a 'Pieta' in marble. In
1501
he returned toFlorence,
where
he stayed until the year 1505.This
periodwas
fruitful ofresults
on which
his after-fame depended.The
great statueof'David,' the
two
unfinished medallions in reliefoftheMadonna,
the 'Holy Family
'
of
the Tribune,
and
the cartoon ofthe'BathingSoldiers'were
now
produced;and
no man's name,
not even Leonardo's, stood higher in esteemthence-forward.
SinceMichelangeloatthistime
was employed
in the serviceofmasterswho
had superseded his old friends and patrons,it
may
be well to reviewhere his attitude ingeneraltowardthehouse of Medici.Throughout
hislifetime therecontinued a conflict
between
the artistand
thecitizen,the artistowing
edu-cation and
employment
to successivemembers
ofthat house, the citizenre-senting theirdespotism
and
at times doing allthat inhim
layto keepthem
out of Florence..
As
apatriot, as the student of
Dante and
the disciple ofSavonarola, Michelangelo detested tyrants.
As
an artist,owing
hisadvance-ment
to Lorenzo, he hacl accepted favors bindinghim
by tiesofgratitude tothe Medici, and
even
involvinghim
in the downfall of their house.For
Leo
X.
he undertook to build the facade of SanLorenzo
andthe LaurentianLibrary.
For Clement
VII. he began the statues fortheMedici
tombs. Yet, while acceptingthesecommissions from
Medicean
popes, he could not keephistongue
from
speaking openlyagainsttheirdespotism.During
thesiege of
Florence,in 1529, hefortifiedSan Miniato, and allowed himselftobe
named
one ofthe Otto di Guerra chosen forthe express purpose of defendingFlor-ence against the Medici; yet after the fall ofthe city he
made
peace withClement
by consentingto finish thetombs
ofSan Lorenzo.When
Clement
VII. died the last representativeof Michelangelo's old patrons perished,andjfticftclangelo
23the sculptor
was
free to quit Florence forever. It is thus clear that the pa-triot, the artist,and theman
ofhonor were
atodds in him. Loyaltyobligedhim
toserve the family towhom
heowed
somuch
; he was, moreover,de-pendent foropportunitiesof doing great
work
on
the verymen
whose
public policy he execrated.Hence
arose acompromise and
a confusion, hard toaccommodate
with our conception of his upright and unyielding temper.Only
by
voluntary exile, andafter age hadmade
him
stubborn to resistse-ductive offers, could Michelangelo declare himself a citizen
who
heldno
truce with
tyrants.
This
digression, though necessary for the right understanding of Michel-angelo's relation to the Medici, has carriedme
beyond
his Florentineresi-dence in
15011505.
The
great achievement of that periodwas
not the'
David,' but thecartoonforthe '
BathingSoldiers.'
The
hallofthe ConsiglioGrande
had been opened, and one wall had been assigned to Leonardo. Michelangelowas
now
invited bythe signory to prepare a design foranotherside ofthestatechamber.
When
hedisplayedhis cartoonto the Florentines theypronounced
thatDa
Vinci, hitherto the undisputed prince of painting,was
surpassed. It is impossible for us to form an opinion in this matter, since both cartoonsare lostbeyond
recovery.We
onlyknow
that, as Cellini says,"while
they lasted, they formed the school of thewhole
world," andmade
anepoch
in thehistory ofart.
When
we
inquirewhat was
the subjectof Michelangelo's
famous
picture,we
find that he hadaimed
at representingnothing of
more
moment
than a group of soldiers suddenly surprisedby
atrumpet-call to battle while bathing in the
Arno,
acrowd
ofnaked
men
in every posture indicating haste,anxiety, and
struggle.
Not
forits intellec-tual meaning, not for its color, not for its sentiment,was
this design so highly prized. Its sciencewon
the admiration ofartistsand
the public.Meanwhile,
anew
pope had been elected, and in1505
Michelangelowas
oncemore
called toRome.
Throughout
his artist's life he oscillated thusbetween
Rome
and Florence Florencethe cityofhisancestry,and
Rome
the city ofhis soul; Florencewhere
helearned his art,andRome
where
hedisplayed
what
art can do ofhighest. Juliuswas
a patron ofdifferentstamp
from
Lorenzo
the Magnificent.Between
Julius and Michelangelo there existed the strongbond
ofsympathy
due tocommunity
of temperament.Both
aimed atcolossalachievementsintheirrespective fieldsofaction.Both
were
uomini terribilly to use a phrase denoting vigor of charactermade
for-midable by an abrupt,
uncompromising
temper.Both
worked
confur-ia,withthe impetuosity of daemonic natures, and both left the impress oftheir indi-vidualitygraven indelibly
upon
theirage.
Julius ordered the sculptortoprepare his
mausoleum.
Michelangeloasked,"
Where
am
I to place it?
"
Julius replied,
"
In St. Peter's."But
the oldbasilica
was
too small forthisambitious pontifPs sepulchre as designedby theaudacious artist. It
was
therefore decreed that anew
St. Peter's should bebuilt to hold it. In this
way
thetwo
great labors of Buonarroti's lifewere
mapped
out forhim
in amoment.
But, by a strange contrarietyof fate, toBramante
and San Gallo fell24
4ftater0ttatt
St. Peter's. It
was
only in extreme old age that Michelangelocrowned
itwith that world's miracle, the
dome.
The
mausoleum,
to form a canopy forwhich
the buildingwas
designed, dwindleddown
at last to the statue of*
Moses
'thrust out ofthe
way
in the church of San Pietro inVincoli."La
tragedia della Sepoltura"as
Condi
vi aptlyterms the historyofJulius'monu-ment, began thusin
1505
and draggedon
till 1545.Rarelydid Michelangelo undertake a
work
commensurate
with his creativepower
but somethingcame
to interrupt its execution; while tasksoutside his sphere,forwhich
henever bargained, the painting of the Sistine Chapel, the facade of San Lorenzo, the fortification of San Miniato,
were
thrustupon him
in themidst ofother
more
congeniallabors.What we
possessofhis achievements
is a torso ofhis
huge
designs.
Julius' tomb, as Michelangelo conceived it,
would
have been themost
stupendous
monument
ofsculpture in the world.Of
this giganticscheme
only
one
imperfect drawingnow
remains.The
'
Moses
' and the 'Bound
Captives 'are all that Michelangelo accomplished.
For
forty years the'
Moses
'remained in his workshop.
For
forty years he cherished ahope
that his plan might still in part be executed, complaining the while that itwould
have been better forhim
to havemade
sulphur matches all his lifethan to have taken
up
the desolating artist's trade."
Every
day," he cries,"
I
am
stoned as though I had crucified Christ.My
youth has been lost,bound hand
and foot to thistomb."
Michelangelo spenteight
months
at this periodamong
the stone-quarriesofCarrara, selecting marble forthe pope's tomb. In
November,
1505, themarble
was
shipped,and
the quays ofRome
were
sooncrowded
with blocks destined forthemausoleum.
But
when
the sculptor arrived he found thatenemies had been poisoning the pope's
mind
against him, and that Juliushad
abandoned
thescheme
of themausoleum.
On
six successive days hewas
denied entrance to the Vatican, and the last time with such rudenessthathe determined to quit
Rome.
He
hurried straightway to his house, sold his effects,mounted, and
rode without furtherceremony
toward Florence,sending to the
pope
a written message biddinghim
to seek for Michel-angelo elsewhere in future than inRome.
It is related that Julius, anxiousto recover
what
had been so lightly lost, sent several.couriers to bringhim
back. Michelangeloannounced
that he intended to accept theSul-tan's
commission
for building a bridge at Pera, and refused to be persuadedto return to
Rome.
When
the sculptor had reached Florence Julius ad-dressed himself to Soderini,who,
unwilling to displease the pope, inducedMichelangelo to seek the pardon ofthe master he had so abruptly quitted. It
was
atBologna
that they met."
You
have waited thuslong, it seems,"
said the pope, well satisfiedbut surly, "till
we
shouldcome
ourselves to seekyou."
The
prelatewho
had introduced the sculptornow
began tomake
ex-cuses forhim,
whereupon
Juliusturned in a furyupon
the officious courtier,and had
him
beatenfrom
his presence.A
few
days after this encounter Michelangelowas
ordered to cast abronze statue ofJulius (laterdestroyed)jftic&ciangelo
25Itseemsthat Michelangelo's flight
from
Rome
in1506 was
due not onlyto his disappointment about the
tomb,
but also to his fearlest Julius shouldgive
him
uncongenialwork
to do. Bramante, ifwe may
believe the oldstory,had whisperedthat it
was
ill-omened foraman
to build hisown
sepul-chre, and that it
would
be well toemploy
the sculptor's geniusupon
theceiling oftheSistine Chapel. Accordingly,
on
his return toRome
in 1508,this
new
taskwas
allottedhim. In vain did Michelangeloremind
his master ofthemonths
wastedin the quarries of Carrara; in vain he pointed to his designs forthemonument,
and
pleaded that hewas
nota painterbyprofes-sion. Julius had
made
up hismind
that he should paint the Sistine.What-ever the sculptor's original reluctance
may
have been, itwas
speedily
over-come
;and
the cartoons fortheceiling, projected with the unitybelongingto a single great conception,
were
ready by thesummer
of 1508.The
difficulty of hisnew
task aroused the artist's energy. Ifwe
couldaccept thelegend
whereby
contemporariesexpressedtheiradmiration forthisTitanic labor,
we
should haveto believe the impossible, that only twentymonths were
devoted to the execution of a series of paintings almostun-equalled in theirdelicacy,
and
surpassed byfew
singlemasterpieces in extent.Though
some
uncertainty remains as to the exact dates of thecommence-ment
and completion of the vault,we now know
that Michelangelocon-tinued
painting it atintervals during four successive years;
and though
we
are notaccurately informed about his helpers,
we
no
longer can doubt that able craftsmen yieldedhim
assistance.There
isgood
reason to believe thathe began his painting during the
autumn
of1508
; and before theend
ofthe year
1512
thewhole was
completed.The
conceptionwas
entirely hisown.
The
execution,exceptinsubordinate detailsand in matters pertainingtothe mason's craft,
was
also his.The
rapidity with
which
he laboredwas
astounding.
Nor
needwe
strip theromance from
that time-honored tale ofthegreat master'ssolitude.
Lying on
hisback
beneaththe drearyvault,com-muning
with Dante, Savonarola, and theHebrew
prophets in the intervalsoflabor, locking
up
the chapel doors in orderto elude the jealous curiosityofrivals, eating but little and scarcely
sleeping, he accomplished in sixteen
months
thefirstpart ofhis gigantictask.From
time to time Julius climbedthe scaffold
and
inspected thepainter's progress. Dreading lest death shouldcome
before thework
was
finished, he kept crying,"When
willyou
make
anend?"
"When
I can," answered the painter."You
seem
to want,"rejoined the petulant old
man,
"that I should haveyou thrown
down
fromthe scaffold."
Then
Michelangelo's brush stopped.The
machinerywas
removed, and the frescoswere
uncovered in theirincompleteness to the eyesof
Rome.
. . .The
starof Raphael, meanwhile, hadarisenoverRome.
Itdoes not appear that thetwo
artists engaged in petty rivalries, or that theycame much
into personal contactwith each other.While
Michelangelowas
so framedthat hecould learn
from
no man,
Raphael gladlylearnedof Michelangelo; and afterthe uncovering of the Sistine frescos, his
manner
showed
evidentsigns of
26
jHaterin&rt
AfterthedeathofJulius,
Leo
X.,in character the reverseofhisfiery
prede-cessor,and by
temperament
unsympathetictothe austereMichelangelo, found nothingbetter forthesculptor'sgenius thanto sethim
atwork
upon
the facadeof San
Lorenzo
atFlorence.The
better partoftheyearsbetween 1516
and1520
was
spent in quarrying marble atCarrara,PietraSanta,andSeravezza.This
isthemost
aridand
unfruitfulperiodof Michelangelo's longlife,aperiodofdelays
and
thwartedschemes and
servile labors.What
makes
the senseof disappointment greater is that the facade of San
Lorenzo was
not evenfinished.
We
hurry over this wilderness of wasted months, and arrive atanother
epoch
ofartistic production.Already in
1520
the Cardinal Giulio de' Medici had conceivedthe notion ofbuilding a sacristy in SanLorenzo
to receive themonuments
of Cosimo,the founder of the house;
Lorenzo
the Magnificent; Giuliano,Duke
ofNemours
;Lorenzo,
Duke
ofUrbino
;Leo
X.,and
himself.To
Michel-angelo
was committed
the design,and
in 1521 he began to apply himselftothe work.
This
new
undertaking occupiedhim
at intervalsbetween
1521 and 1534,a spaceof timedecisive forthe fortunesoftheMediciin Florence.Leo
died,and
Giulio,afterafew
years,succeededhim
asClement
VII.Rome
was
sacked by the Imperial troops; then Michelangelo quitted the statuesand helpedto defend his nativecityagainst the Prince of Orange. Afterthe
failureoftheRepublicans he
was
recalled to hislaborsby
command
of Clement.Sullenlyandsadlyhe quarried marbles forthe sacristy. Sadlyand sullenlyhe
used his chiselyear byyear,
making
the verystones crythatshame
and ruinwere
thedoom
ofhiscountry.At
last,in 1534,Clement
died.Then
Michel-angelo flung
down
hismallet.The
monuments
remained forever unfinished,and
the sculptor set foot in Florenceno
more.Michelangelo had
now
reachedhisfifty-ninthyear.Leonardo
and Raphaelhad already passed away,
and were
remembered
asthegiantsofabygone
ageofgold. Correggio
was
in hislastyear.Andrea
delSartowas
dead.Nowhere
exceptatVenice
didItalian artstillflourish;and
themundane
styleofTitianwas
nottothesculptor'staste.He
hadoverlived the greatnessofhiscountry,and
saw
Italy in ruins.Yet
hewas
destined to survive anotherthirtyyears,and
to witness stillworse days.When
we
callMichelangelo theinterpreter
ofthe burden and the pain oftheRenaissance,
we
must
remember
thislong,weary
old age, duringwhich
in solitude and silence hewatched
theextinc-tion ofFlorence, the institution ofthe Inquisition,and the abasement ofthe
Italian spirit beneath the tyranny of Spain. His sonnets, written chiefly in this latter period oflife,turn often
on
the thought ofdeath. His love ofart yields to religioushope
andfear, and hebemoans
ayouth andmanhood
spentin
vanity.
In
1534
the Cardinal Alessandro Farnesewas
made
pope
underthename
of Paul III. Michelangelo had shed lustreon
the reigns ofthree popes, hispredecessors. AfterJulius, Leo, and Clement, the time
was
now
come
forthe heroiccraftsmanto serve Paul.
The
pope foundhim
atwork
in his bottegaon
thetomb
ofJulius; forthe"
tragedyofthe
mausoleum
"
stilldragged on.
jtticfjclangelo
27foronepope.
Give
me
yourcontractwiththeDuke
ofUrbino
; I willtearit.Have
Iwaited allthese years,andnow
that Iam
pope
at last,shallI not haveyou
formyself? Iwant you
intheSistine Chapel." AccordinglyMichelan-gelo,
who
had alreadymade
cartoonsforthe'
Last
Judgment
'duringthe life
of Clement, once
more
laid aside thechiseland
tookup
thebrush.For
eightyears,
between 1534
and 1542, he labored at the fresco, devotinghis terriblegenius to a subject
worthy
ofthetimes inwhich
he lived.After the painting of the
'
Last Judgment,' one
more
great laborwas
reserved for him.
By
a briefofSeptember
1535, Paul III. hadmade
him
the chiefarchitect, aswell as sculptor and painter,ofthe
Holy
See.He
was
now
calledupon
to superintend the building ofSt. Peter's, and to this task,undertaken forthe repose ofhis soulwithout
emolument,
he devotedthelastyearsofhislife,andthe
dome
ofSt. Peter's, asseenfrom
Tivoli or theAlban
hills, like a cloud
upon
theCampagna,
is Buonarroti's.Michelangelo's thoughts
meanwhile were
turnedmore
and more, as time advanced, to piety; andmany
ofhis sonnets breathe an almostascetic spiritofreligion. It is pleasant to
know
thattheselast yearswere
alsothe happiestand calmest.
Though
his brothers had passedaway
beforehim one
by one,his
nephew
Leonardo
had married,and
begotten a son called Michelangelo.Thus
he hadthesatisfactionof hoping that hisname
would
endureand
flour-ish, asindeedithasdone
almosttothis veryday in Florence.What
consola-tion this thought
must
have broughthim
is clear to thosewho
have studiedhiscorrespondence and observedthe tender careandcontinualanxiety he had
for his kinsmen.
Wealth
now
belonged tohim
; but he had never cared formoney,
and he continued to live like a poorman,
-.dressingsoberlyand
eatingsparely, often taking but
one meal
in the day,and
that of bread and wine.He
slept little,and
rose by night towork
upon
his statues, wearing a capwith a candle stuck in frontofit that he might see
where
todrive the chiselhome.
During
hiswhole
lifehehad beensolitary,partlybypreference, partly
by devotion to his art,
and
partly because he keptmen
at a distance by hismanner.
Not
that Michelangelowas
sourorhaughty; but he spokehismind
out
very plainly,had
no
tolerance for fools, andwas
aptto fly into passions.Time
hadnow
softened histemper and removed
all causes of discourage-ment.He
had survived every rival,and
the worldwas
convinced of hissupremacy. Princes courted
him
; theCount
ofCanossa
was
proud to claimhim
for akinsman
; strangers,when
they visitedRome,
were
eagertobeholdin
him
its greatest living wonder. His old agewas
the serene and splendid evening ofatoilsome day.But
betterthan allthis, henow
enjoyed both love and friendship.If Michelangelo could ever have been
handsome
ismore
than doubtful. Early in his youth a quarrelsome fellow pupil broke his nose with ablow
ofthe fist. Henceforth the artist's soul looked forth
from
asadface,with small gray eyes, flat nostrils, and rugged weight ofjutting brows.Good
carewas
thus taken that light love should not triflewiththe
man
who
was
destinedtobe the prophet ofhisageinart.
He
seemed
incapableofattachinghimselfto28
ftL&fitttft
in
<& r tand amour,
we
hear of nothing to imply that Michelangelowas
a lover tillhe reached theage ofsixty.
How
hemay
have loved in the earlierperiodsofhis life,
whereof no
recordnow
remains, can only be guessed from the tendernessand
passion outpoured in thepoems
of his lateryears.
That
hismoralitywas
pure andhisconverse withoutstainis emphatically witnessedby both Vasari and Condivi.
But
that his emotionwas
intense,and
that tobeauty in all its
human
forms hewas
throughouthis life a slave,we
havehisown
sonnets to prove.In theyear
1534
he firstbecame
acquainted with the noble lady Vittoria,daughter of Fabrizio Colonna,
and
widow
of theMarquis
of Pescara. Shewas
then aged forty-four. Living in retirement inRome,
sheemployed
herleisure with philosophy
and
poetry. Artists andmen
of letterswere
admittedto her
society.
Among
thesubjects she hadmost
at heartwas
the reform of theChurch and
the restorationofreligiontoits evangelical purity.
Between
her and Michelangelo a tender affection sprangup, based
upon
thesympathy
ofardent
and
high-seekingnatures. Iflovebe therightname
forthis exaltedand
yet fervid attachment, Michelangelo
may
be said to have loved her withall the pent-up forces ofhis heart.
When
theywere
together inRome
they
met
frequentlyfor conversationon
thethemes
ofartandpietytheyboth held
dear.
When
theywere
separated theyexchanged poems
and wrote letters,some
ofwhich
remain.On
the death ofVittoria, in 1547, the light oflifeseemed
to be extinguished foroursculptor. It is said that he waited by her bedside,and
kissed herhand
when
shewas
dying.The
sonnets heafterwardscomposed
show
that his soul followed her to heaven.At
last themoment
came
when
this strong solitary spirit,much
sufferingand
much
loving, had to render its account.On
the eighteenth ofFebru-ary, 1564, having bequeathed his soul to
God,
hisbody
tothe earth, and hisworldly goods to his kinsfolk, praying
them on
his death-bed to thinkupon
Christ'spassion,hebreathedhislast. Hiscorpse
was
transportedtoFlorence,andburied in the church of Santa
Croce
with greatpomp
and honor
by theDuke,
the city,and
the FlorentineAcademy.
C|)e
art
of
;jEtcf)elanseio
CHARLES
C.PERKINS
'ITALIANSCULPTURE'
IN
greaternone
thanof thein sculpture.manifestationsFor
sculptureof Michelangelo'shis preferencegeniuswas
does he appearsomarked
thathe always turnedtoit
when
notactually forced
by
some
one
ofhistaskmastersto build orto paint. In
one
ofhisletters he says,"
It is only wellwithme
when
Ihave a chisel inmy
hand
;"
and he tells us in one ofhis
most
jmicfjeiangelo
29
"
The
best ofartistshath no thoughtto show"
What
the roughstone inits superfluous shell"
Doth notinclude."Teeming
with possibilities,thevirginblockseemed
to hismind
the prisonofa captive ideawaiting tobe set freeby the actionofhis stronghand, with
which
he dealtblow
after blow, until, possessed by a fresh thought, he left the half-revealedimage
in a state vague as music, and as suggestive to the imagination.An
enemy
to tradition in art as well as to a positive imitation ofnature, following neither the conventionalists, the realists, nor the worshippers ofthe antique,he
was
agreatdreamer,who
developedman
intosomethingmore
thanman, and
by the noveltyand
strangeness ofhis creations placedhim-selfout ofthe paleofordinarycriticism. His defects,
which
are palpable to all, are surrounded, like the spots in the sun, by a dazzling indistinctnesswhich
renders itimpossible to
examine them
closely.Many
are the artistswho
suit our taste better,move
our feelingsmore
deeply,and
satisfy us athousand times
more
than this Titan ofa late time; butwe know
of none,ancient ormodern,
who
leaves a strongerimpression ofpower upon
themind, orwho
more
unmistakably imprinted thestamp
of geniusupon
all that hetouched.
EUGENE
GUILLAUME
GAZETTE
DESBEAUX-ARTS:
1876SCULPTURE
isMichelangelo'sdomain. Herein he has
no
rivalsamong
the moderns.
That
artwas
hispredilection,
and
yet itwas
in that artthat he found his
greatesttorments; for his
was no
facile genius,andtosuch aman
sculpture could beno mere
distraction.The
all-embracing thoughtswhich
stirred within him,and
which
are echoed in the high poetry of hissonnets, could not be bodied forth within the restricted
domain
of materialform, and his
lifelong effort to broaden that
domain
made
the practice ofsculpture a continual struggle to him.
It hasbeen said thatthe sublime isdistinguishedfromthebeautifulinthat,
while the latterexpresses the idea of something exalted yet serene, like the
fair azure ofthe sky, the former always connotes thesense ofstruggle, a struggle against superiorforces, the travail of sentiment
and
thought in theiron
bonds
ofart. Ifwe
accept thesedefinitions, Michelangelo'sworks
aresublime ratherthan beautiful.
Traces
ofa fierce struggle with the materialis evident in all ofthem.
Power
ismore
strongly expressed than order, andawe
iscommingled
with ouradmiration.The
'
IIPensieroso'andthe *
Moses
'represent the art of sculpture carried to its highest pitch of grandeur, of energy, and ofpassion.
Itisafalseandunjust pointofview,however,to see inMichelangelo's
work
onlywhat
his critics have so exclusively considered, the force, the excessofviolence
which
surprisesthe mind,the torrentwhich
carries usout ofour accustomedcommonplaces
of thought.There
is also a science inthem
which
we
must
recognize, and admire without reserve. In all hisworks
he30
;Jttatergin&rt
science ofexecution,
which
humiliates us.The
grandeur ofhis figures, thedignity of their outlines, the
monumental
character ofone and
all, isun-matched
;and
in the art ofposing, constructing, and basing a figure,what-ever
may
be thesubject orthe action, the student
must
alwaysbow
beforeMichelangeloasincomparable. His
supremacy
in the essential anddistinct-ive qualities ofsculpture (qualitiesof
which
sculptors are so justly jealous), equilibrium, justness ofmovement,
the exact balance ofmasses,order, inaword, those
which
giveto Michelangelo'sfigures,even
themost
tormented,,an imposing stability
which
givesthem
the aspect of something eternal,these architectonic qualities have not been sufficiently
remarked
or broughttothe attention ofstudentsofhiswork. Because of them,
and
through them, however, Michelangelo is absolutely classic, themost
classic of allmodern
artists.And
yet, all this said and granted,we
must
alwayscome
back
finally tothe
supreme
and distinctive anddominant
qualityofall power.Through
every one ofhisworks,
howsoever
incomplete, shines the underlying inspira-tion,andthe spectatormay
follow the master'sthought throughallthebaffling obstaclesand stormycrises.Through
the materialveilthe ideaisalways splen-didly apparent.The
genius ofthe artist is ever superior to his handiwork.Such works
ofart as these are notmade
only to be looked at, or to pro-ducemere
sensual delight. Michelangelo'ssculpturesare to be thought overand brooded upon.
They
propound
new
questionings to us endlessly; theytorment our spirits; they evoke and germinate
new
thoughts.FROM
THE
FRENCH.
MARCEL
REYMOND
'LASCULPTURE
FLORENTINE*
IT
is
most
difficult to speak of Michelangelo.How
is itpossible to find just
words
to tell of the extraordinary beauty of his artand
yet to tellalso ofthat excess
which mars
even themost
beautiful ofthem;
toshow
how
the excellentand
the detestableelbow one
another?His typeisnot altogether unique in art.
To
unitebadtaste and themost
sublime beauties isthe lot of such ardent souls ashis, such violent tempera-ments, overflowing with activity,and
it is also a trait proper to precociousepochs in
which
toomuch
science leads to exaggerationand
forgetfulnessof
nature. In Michelangelo's case, both the time in
which
he lived and the characterofhisgeniusjointlyconspiredtolead
him from
beautyofstyle,and
to lurehim
into excesses.There
is nothing in hiswork
which
canjustify
the comparison of
him
to Phidias. If he is to becompared
toany
Greek
artists, it is to those sculptors of the decadence, the masters of the school of
Pergamos and
Rhodes,who
carved the*Torso
'and the 'Laocoon.'
It is a mistake through admiration for great geniuses to blinktheir faults
and
to speak only oftheirglories.
The
greater aman
and
themore
he im-posesupon
our imaginations, themore
important it is to discern and todis-criminate
clearly the qualities in
which
his genius ismost
manifest,and
inMichelangelo's case such discrimination is the
more
necessary because hisMicheangeo
31In anessay
upon
thearchitecturalworks
ofMichelangelo, CharlesGamier
has
clearly touched the nature of his genius.
"
Michelangelo," he says,
"
even Michelangelo has failed.
Too
often in seeking forthe grand he hasfound onlythetormented,in seekingthe
originalhehasfound onlythestrange
and even the ignoble."
As
iffrightened by this dictum,
Gamier
hastens toadd that he judges Michelangelo thus only in his architectural works, and attempts to point out
why
such reproaches are notjust
when
applied to his painting and his sculpture.The
truth is, however, thatwhat
Michelangelowas
as an architect hewas
as a painterand
sculptor."Tormented,"
"strange,"
were
thewords
written by an architect studying Michelangeloas an architect do theynot
seem
at least asjustwhen
we
studytheMed-ici tombs, or, above all, the
'
Last Judgment,'
which
istruly the strangest
and
most
tormentedwork
thathaseverbeencreated? Yet, andin spiteofall his defects, Michelangelo remainsone
ofthegreatest,ifnot the very greatest,ofall
modern
artists.Let
us seewhy.
In the first place,
from
the point ofview
of technicalknowledge
of his art he is unrivalled.Nobody
has everdrawn
better than hedrew
;nobody
has ever
known
thehuman
body
better.He
abused hisknowledge
withoutdoubt, forin his Medici tombs, and aboveall in his 'Last Judgment,' he has represented attitudescontrary tonature; but he has represented
them
alwayswith such impeccable science that it is impossible not to admire
even
hismost
violent aberrations.He
was,moreover,amarvellousworkman.
None
ever carved stone with
more
brio,none
ever had such a passion forthema-terial sideofhis art; and for thisreason hewillalways be the idealofthose
ofhis
own
calling.These
abilities,however,make
up
butasmall partofhis genius.Michel-angelo'strue title to glory lies in his thoughtrather than in the
means
ofitsexpression.
He
divorced himselffrom
theRenaissancetojoinwith thegreat Christian schoolofapreceding time.He
is great because inthe vaulting ofthe Sistine Chapel he recreated the prophets
and
thesibyls,
and
impressedthem
withallthenobilityofhisown
soul.He
isgreat,aboveall,through his suffering. In the presence of those strange figures oftheMedici
tombs
we
hearthatcry
which
man
would
everfainstophis ears against,andyet perforcemust
alwayslisten to hear, the cryofsufferingofthehuman
soul. . . .Ifthrough Michelangelo'svaried
work
we
seektospellout themind which
conceived it, and seek therein thedominant
note, itseems
tome
thatwe
shall find it tobe an
immense
pride.From
such a pridewould
flow theex-pression of power, the moral
and
physical sovereignty of his Virgins, his'
David,' his '
Victory,' and all the figures of the Sistine;
and
as acorrela-tive quality, the rebellion, the revolt, the mighty resistance,
which
we
find in the 'Bound
Captive,' the'
Day,'
and
the'
Moses.'
To
suchapride, also,we may
trace the sources of that great suffering (so deeply are the souls ofmen
ofgenius susceptible towounds) which
cries out of the'Dawn,' the 'Twilight,' the'Descent from
the Cross,'and
the 'LastJudgment'
suf-ferings of
which
the ultimate result is profound misanthropy, disgust withJtta^terg
in
&rt
Michelangelohas played tooimportanta part in the
historyofart foreven
theleast detailsofhis
work
tolack interest. Itwould
be unjust, truly, tosaythat he lacks invention, he
who
created sonew
a style andendowed
withlife so
many
figures, but nevertheless he repeated himselfoften. Certainformulas
seemed
to imposeon
his thought.Having
an idea to express, hedemanded
nothing from a model, but sought in hisown
mind
forthe formwhich
hewas
to create,and
the mirrorofhismind
seems always to havereflected that
form
with something ofitsown
idiosyncrasy.
Let
me
subjoin a list ofwhat
Imay
call the "habits"
of Michelangelo:w D
For
the general outline of a statue hewas
accustomed to adopt onone
sidealong
straightline,
and
on
theotheracurved and brokenone.He
liked tohug one
arm
close to the body,or tothrow
it behind in sucha fashion as tomake
itpractically disappear,
and
in opposition,to raise theother,and so place it as toform
asharp anglewith the body.The
arm which
isadvanced is always ofthegreatest beauty, but the gesture,too often violent, is notal-ways
rational.Of
thetwo
legs, hemakes one
support all the weight ofthebody,
and
raises the other; andtoaugment
this difference,which seemed
toplease him, heoften, and for
no
logical reason, placed the foot oftheraised leg
on
a pedestal. In his seated figuresone
leg is advanced and the otherusually sharplybent beneaththebody.
One
shoulderisalwayshigherthantheother, acharacteristic
which became more
striking in each successive work.Ifthe
body
is seen three-quarters front, the head is full front.The
head isalmost always bent forward,
and
overthehairofhiswomen
he throws heavyveils
which
have something the aspect ofhelmets.Too
often Michelangelo did not seek toevolvefrom
his subject the ideaswhich
should have ledhim
to a choice offorms.He
ratheremployed
theforms
which
hedeemed
beautiful inthemselves; and theseformshavesome-times
no
linkwiththe ideawhich
he wishedtoexpress.
FROM THE
FRENCH.
WILHELM
LUBKE
<GESCHICHTE
DER PLASTIK'SINCE
the periodof classic
antiquity,
no
masterhas beenendowed
withsuch
eminent
plastic talent asMichelangelo.However
importanthisworks
inarchitectureandsculpture
may
be,sculpturewas,and
remained,his favorite art.Even
the purest and greatest of his painted figures, such as the sibylsand prophets ofthe Sistine Chapel, are plastic in conception.
In order to completely master the
human
figure, Michelangelo gave upmany
years ofhisyouth to amore
thorough studyofanatomy
than everhas been undertaken by any othermodern
master.He,
first since the ancients, valued thehuman
form in all its majesty and for itsown
sake;and
theaim
ofhis endeavor
became
to exhibit it in all conceivable attitudes andfore-shortenings, to delineate it
grandly, freely, and broadly, after the
manner
of the antique.But
Michelangelowas more
hewas
an idealist in the strictest sense ofthe word. In his earliest
works
he strove aftera perfect beauty, such as isexpressed in the creations ofantique sculpture. Seeking thusfora universal
concep-jtticfjelangelo
33tion
which
had occupied so prominent a place throughout the fifteenthcen-tury.
What
could his ageafford to such a Titan ? Christian personages and the spiritual ideawhich
animatedthem were
ill-adapted to an art ofwhich
the
aim
was
to glorify thehuman
figure in its pure beauty; yet antiquemythology
had died out; and if, at times, a mythological subject presenteditself,theoccasionsweretoorare,andthesubject,in spiteofallthe prevalent
enthusiasm for
antiquity, too far
removed from
modern
subjective feeling. Stillmore
alien to Michelangelo's geniuswas
the historicalsubject, with its
exact
and
individual features. Nothing, therefore, remained tohim
but therealm ofallegory,thevague forms of
which
offeredthemselvesasreadyvehiclesforthe presentationofhissubjectiveideas. Allegory, then, presentedtheonly
means
of outlet,and
a dangerous one, to the capricious fancy ofthe artist.Unfettered subjectivity prevailed in the world of art for the first time. It
recognized
no
subjectivebondsinitsabsolutesway
; ithadcast offtheleading-strings oftradition and, absorbed in its
own
profound inspirations, wrestled mightily toproducefrom
them
the grandesteffect. All Michelangelo'sworks
betray suchastruggle thestruggleof sublimeideasstrivingtosurge
up
intobeing from the wonderful depths of his mind, and bearing
upon them
everymark
ofthe mighty throeswhich
gavethem
birth.There
can beno calm enjoyment
of such works.They
irresistiblyinvolve usintheirpassion, and,whetherwe
willor no,make
us sharersoftheirtragedy.
This
isthe impressionwhich
even his contemporaries feltwhen
they spokeofthe "terrible
"
in Michelangelo's works.In ordertoprocure an adequateexpressionforthesemighty,profound,and
yet scarcely definable ideas, Michelangelo soon began to
make
thehuman
form
the manikin of his sovereign will.The
fundamental ideal, laboriouslyproduced through aninternal conflict,could only
become
externally availableby
making
the laws ofphysical organizationyield to it.
Thus,
then, beganhis
sway
ofidea over form. Itbecame
a matter oflittle importance to themaster whether an attitude
was
naturalor unconstrained ifonly itthrillingly
expressed
what was
surging within hismind
; and sohemoulded
thehuman
form at will, gave to certain parts exaggerated colossal might, increased the
power
ofthe muscles, and neglected other parts(as, for example, almost
al-ways
the back ofthe head in his statues),and
thus prescribednew
laws tothe
human
frame.In the
greatest masterpieces, even
among
the ancients, small intentional departuresfrom
truth are oftenjust the points onwhich
the spiritual effectofthe
whole
depends; but Michelangelo frequently indulges too far in thispoetic license,and falls into exaggeration,
and
therefore intougliness.
Thus
the
same
Michelangelowho
possessed the highest idea of thebeauty ofthehuman
body
at last arrived at a conception ofform
which, as it were, wil-fully avoided thebeautiful.Bufrrude and unpleasing asthey sometimes
may
be, his figures are neverpetty or ordinary. In these bold forms, grandly outlined