• No results found

- Based Graceful Labeling for Graphs Obtained from Circuits Merged with Paths

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "- Based Graceful Labeling for Graphs Obtained from Circuits Merged with Paths"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ISSN 2319-8133 (Online) (An International Research Journal), www.compmath-journal.org

Fuzzy 10

k

- Based Graceful Labeling for Graphs Obtained from Circuits Merged with Paths

A. Solairaju

1

and T. Narppasalai Arasu*

2

1

Associate Professor of Mathematics,

Jamal Mohamed College (Autonomous), Trichy, INDIA.

2

Assistant Professor of Mathematics,

Chikkanna Government Arts College Tirupur, INDIA.

email :

1

[email protected],

2

[email protected]

(Received on: September 6, 2018)

ABSTRACT

A labeling graph G which can be gracefully numbered is called graceful. A graph which admits a fuzzy 10k-based graceful labeling is called a fuzzy 10k-based graceful graph. In this paper the existence of fuzzy 10k- based gracefulness to graphs obtained from circuits merged with paths were discussed.

Mathematical Subject Classification 2010: 05C78, 05C72.

Keywords: Graceful labeling, Fuzzy graceful labeling, Fuzzy 10k-based graceful labeling, Mirror image of a graph.

1. INTRODUCTION

Graph theory is an important tool to represent real world problems. Rosenfeld

introduced the concept of fuzzy graphs since it is not always possible to represent all systems

in conventional graph theory due to the uncertainty of the parameters in the system. Fuzzy

relation on a set was defined by Zadeh

8

in 1965 and definition of a fuzzy graph was given by

Rosenfeld and kauffmann in 1973. The concept of graceful labeling has been introduced by

Rosa

6

in 1976. A. Nagoorgani, D. Rajalakshmi(a)Subhasini

4,5

and Bhattacharya P

1

discussed

some properties of graph labeling using fuzzy graph theory. R. Jebesty Shajila and S.Vimala

3

performed fuzzy vertex labeling on wheel and fan graphs . The graphs which are used in this

paper are discussed in the dynamic survey of graph labeling by J.A. Gallian

2

and the graphs

introduced by Vaidya S.K and Lekha Bijukumar

7

. In this paper we discuss the fuzzy 10

k

-based

graceful labeling for nC *P , nP *P ,mirror image of nP *P and nC *2P *(n-1)P graphs.

(2)

Definition 2.1: A path P

n

with n vertices is a walk in which no vertex appears more than once.

Definition 2.2 : A closed path P

n

is called a cycle C

n

.

Definition 2.3 : A fuzzy graph G = 〈 , 〉 is a pair of functions : → [0,1] and : × → [0,1] such that for all , ∈ , ℎ ( , ) ≤ ( )⋀ ( )

Definition 2.4 : A labeling of a graph is an assignment of values to the vertices and edges of a graph.

Definition2. 5 : A graceful labeling of a graph G with q edges is an injection : ( ) → {0,1,2, … } such that when each edge is assigned the distinct label | ( ) − ( )|

Definition2. 6 : A graph G = 〈 , 〉 is said to be a fuzzy labeling if : → [0,1] and

: × → [0,1] is bijective such that the membership value of edges and vertices are distinct and ( , ) < ( )⋀ ( ) for all , ∈

3. MAIN RESULTS

Definition 3.1 : A fuzzy graph G = 〈 , 〉 with p vertices and q edges is said to be a fuzzy 10

k

-based graceful labeling if k is a least positive integer such that 0 < + < 10 and : → [0, ] and : × → [0,1]are injective such that the membership value of edges and vertices are distinct and satisfying the following four conditions

(i) ( , ) < ( )⋀ ( ) for all , ∈ (ii) ( , ) = | ( ) − ( )| for all , ∈

(iii) { ( ) × 10 ∈ } ⊂ { + 1, + 2, … 2 + 1}

(iv) { ( ) × 10 ∈ } = {1,2, … }

Definition 3.2 : The graph nC

4

*2P

n

is a connected graph whose vertex set is { , , … } and edge set is

{ , : = 1 − 1} ∪ { , , , : = 1 }

Here p = 4n and q= 6n-2.

Theorem 3.3: The graph = nC ∗ 2P is a Fuzzy 10

k

-based graceful graph.

Proof : Consider a graph G = 〈 , 〉 with p =4n vertices { , , … } and q = 6n-2 edges

{ , : = 1 − 1} ∪ { , , , : = 1 }

such that

: → [0,1] and : × → [0,1] defined by ( ) = 2 + 1

10

(

)

( ) − − 5

10

(3)

( ) = ( ) − 6

10 = 3,5, … − 1

( ) = ( ) + 6

10 = 4,6, … − 1

( ) = ( ) − 1

10

( ) = ( ) − 2

10

( ) =

( )

− 6

10 = 3,5, … − 1

( ) =

( )

+ 6

10 = 4,6, … − 1 ( ) = ( ) − 10

( ) = ( ) − − 2

10

( ) =

( )

+ 6

10 = 3,5, … − 1

( ) =

( )

+ 6

10 = 3,5, … − 1

( ) = ( ) − 3

10

( ) =

( )

− 6

10 = 4,6, … − 1

( ) = ( ) − 4

10

( ) =

( )

− 6

10 = 4,6, … − 1

For example the fuzzy 10

k

-based graceful labelling of, 5C ∗ 2P and 6C ∗ 2P are shown in Fig.3. 1 and Fig.3.2

0.17

0.18

0.01 0.02

0.03 0.19 0.04

0.05

0.20

0.06 0.07 0.08

0.22 0.21 0.23

0.09

0.24 0.25 0.10

0.11

0.27

0.12 0.28

0.13 0.29

0.15

0.14 0.26 0.16

0.48 0.47 0.31

0.32 0.34

0.35

0.50 0.37

0.38 0.51

0.54 0.53

0.40

0.41 0.57

0.43 0.45

0.56 0.44

(4)

Fig.3.2

Fig.3.3

Definition 3.4 : The graph nP ∗ P is a connected graph containing n copies of P

3

and a copy of P

2n

whose vertex set is { , , … } and edge set is

{ : = 1 2 − 1} ∪ { , : = 1 } Here p = 3n and q= 4n-1.

Theorem 3.5 : The graph = nP ∗ P is a Fuzzy 10

k

-based graceful graph.

Proof : Consider a graph G = 〈 , 〉 with p =3n vertices { , , … } and q = 4n-1 edges

{ : = 1 2 − 1} ∪ { , : = 1 } such that

: → [0,1] and : × → [0,1] defined by

( ) = 2 + 1

10

( ) = ( ) − 10

0.17

0.18

0.01 0.02

0.03 0.04

0.19

0.05 0.20

0.06 0.07 0.08

0.21 0.22 0.23

0.09 0.24

0.10 0.25

0.11

0.27

0.12 0.28

0.13 0.29

0.15

0.30

0.14

0.16 0.26

0.47

0.31 0.32

0.33 0.34

0.35 0.49

0.50 0.37

0.38

0.54 0.53

0.41 0.43 0.60 0.59

0.44 0.56

0.66 0.65

0.68 0.62

0.17

0.18

0.01

0.02 0.03

0.04 0.19

0.05

0.20 0.06

0.07

0.08 0.21

0.22

0.23

0.09

0.24

0.10 0.25

0.11 0.27

0.12 0.28

0.13 0.29 0.15

0.30 0.14

0.16 0.26

0.47

0.32 0.38 0.34 0.36 0.40

0.42

0.43 0.45

0.44 0.46

(5)

( ) = ( ) − 1 10 ( ) = ( ) + 2

10 = 3,5, … 2 − 1 ( ) = ( ) − 2

10 = 4,6, … 2

( ) = ( ) + 1

10

( ) =

( )

− 2

10 = 3,5, . . − 1

( ) =

( )

+ 2

10 = 4,6, . . − 1

For example the fuzzy 10

k

-based graceful labelling of , 6P ∗ P is shown in Fig.3.3.

Definition 3.6 : The mirror image of the graph nP ∗ P is a connected graph containing two times of n copies of P

3

and a copy of P

2n

whose vertex set is {v , v , … v } and edge set is {v v : i = 1 to 2n − 1} ∪ {v v , v v : i = 1 to n} ∪ {v v , v v : i = 1 to n} .Here p = 4n and q= 6n-1.

Theorem 3.7: The mirror image of the graph G = nP ∗ P is a Fuzzy 10

k

-based graceful graph.

Proof : Consider a graph G = 〈σ, μ〉 with p =4n vertices {v , v , … v } and q = 6n-1 edges {v v : i = 1 to 2n − 1} ∪ {v v , v v : i = 1 to n} ∪ {v v , v v : i = 1 to n}

such that

σ: V → [0,1] and μ: V × V → [0,1] defined by σ(v ) = 2q + 1

10 σ(v ) = σ(v ) − q

10 σ(v ) = σ(v ) − 2

10 σ v

( )

= σ(v ) + 6

10 for i = n, n − 2, … 1 or 2 if n is odd or even σ(v ) = σ(v ) − 3

10 σ v

( )

= σ(v ) − 6

10 for i = n − 1, n − 3, … 2 or 1 if n is odd or even σ(v ) = σ(v ) − q − 1

10 σ v

( )

= σ(v ) + 6

for i = n + 1, n + 3, … 2n or 2n − 1 if n is odd or even

(6)

σ(v ) = σ(v ) − 10 σ v

( )

= σ(v ) − 6

10 for i = n + 2, n + 4, … 2n − 1 or 2n if n is odd or even σ(v ) = σ(v ) − 6

10 for i = 3n, 3n − 2, . .2n + 1 or 2n + 2 if n is odd or even σ(v ) = σ(v ) + 3

10 σ(v ) = σ(v ) + 6

10 for i = 3n − 1,3n − 3, . .2n + 2 or 2n + 1 if n is odd or even σ(v ) = σ(v ) − 6

10 for i = 4n, 4n − 2, . .3n + 1 or 3n + 2 if n is odd or even σ(v ) = σ(v ) + 4

10 σ(v ) = σ(v ) + 6

10 for i = 4n − 1,4n − 3, . .3n + 2 or 3n + 1 if n is odd or even For example the mirror image of the fuzzy 10

k

-based graceful labeling of 6P ∗ P is shown in Fig.3.4.

Fig.3.4

0.17

0.18 0.01

0.02 0.03

0.04 0.19 0.05

0.20

0.06 0.07

0.08 0.21

0.23 0.22

0.09 0.24

0.10

0.25 0.11

0.27

0.12

0.28

0.13 0.29

0.15

0.30

0.14 0.16

0.26 0.48

0.31 0.32 0.33

0.34

0.49 0.35

0.36 0.37

0.51

0.52 0.39

0.54

0.40

0.57

0.42 0.43

0.59

0.45

0.60

0.46

0.56 0.65

0.71

0.69

0.63

0.66 0.68 0.62

(7)

Definition 3.8 : The graph nC ∗ 2P ∗ (n − 1)P is defined as a connected graph whose vertex set is {v , v , … v } and edge set is

{v v , v v : i = 1 to n − 1} ∪ {v v , v v , v v , v v : i = 1 to n} ∪ {v v : i = 1 to n − 1} Here p = 4n and q = 7n-3.

Theorem 3.9 : The graph G = nC ∗ 2P ∗ (n − 1)P is a Fuzzy 10

k

-based graceful graph.

Proof : Consider a graph G = 〈σ, μ〉 with p =4n vertices {v , v , … v } and q = 7n-3 edges {v v , v v : i = 1 to n − 1} ∪ {v v , v v , v v , v v : i = 1 to n} ∪ {v v : i = 1 to n − 1} such that

σ: V → [0,1] and μ: V × V → [0,1] defined by σ(v ) = 2q + 1

10

σ(v

)

σ(v ) − q − 4 10 σ(v ) = σ(v ) − 7

10 for i = 3,5, … n or n − 1 if n is odd or even σ(v ) = σ(v ) + 7

10 for i = 4,6, … n − 1 or n if n is odd or even σ(v ) = σ(v ) − 1

10 σ(v ) = σ(v ) + 1 10 σ(v ) = σ v

( )

− 7

10 for i = 3,5, … n or n − 1 if n is odd or even σ(v ) = σ v

( )

+ 7

10 for i = 4,6, … n − 1 or n if n is odd or even σ(v ) = σ(v ) − q

10 σ(v ) = σ(v ) − q − 2

10 σ(v ) = σ v

( )

+ 7

10 for i = 3,5, … n or n − 1 if n is odd or even σ(v ) = σ v

( )

+ 7

10 for i = 3,5, … n or n − 1 if n is odd or even σ(v ) = σ(v ) − 3

10 σ(v ) = σ v

( )

− 7

10 for i = 4,6, … n − 1 or n if n is odd or even σ(v ) = σ(v ) − 5

10 σ(v ) = σ v

( )

− 7

10 for i = 4,6, … n − 1 or n if n is odd or even

(8)

of 4C ∗ 2P ∗ 3P and of 5C ∗ 2P ∗ 4P are shown in Fig.3.5 and Fig.3.6

Fig.3.5

Fig.3.6

4. CONCLUSION

In this paper the concept of fuzzy 10

k

-based gracefulness for graphs obtained from circuits merged with paths has been introduced . The extension of this study on some more special graphs is under process.

REFERENCES

1. Bhattacharya P. Some remarks on fuzzy graphs, Pattern Recognition Letter, Vol 6, No.

5,297-302 (1987).

0.17 0.18

0.01 0.02

0.03 0.04

0.19 0.05

0.20 0.06

0.07

0.08 0.21

0.22

0.23 0.09

0.24 0.10

0.25 0.11

0.12

0.28 0.13

0.15 0.30

0.14 0.16

0.26 0.48

0.31

0.33 0.35

0.50

0.37

0.38 0.51

0.41 0.39

0.43 0.44

0.46

0.17 0.18

0.01 0.02

0.03 0.04

0.19 0.05

0.20 0.06

0.07

0.08 0.21

0.22

0.23 0.09

0.24 0.10

0.25 0.11

0.27

0.12 0.28

0.13

0.29 0.15

0.30

0.14 0.16

0.26

0.47

0.31 0.32

0.33 0.35 0.49

0.50 0.37

0.38

0.51

0.40 0.55 0.53

0.57 0.42 0.58

0.45 0.60

0.44

0.62

0.64 0.65

(9)

2. Gallian J.A, A Dynamic Survey of Graph Labelling. The Electronics Journal of Combinatorics, (2016).

3. Jebesty Shajila R. and Vimala S. , Fuzzy Vertex labelling on wheel and fan graphs , IOSR Journal of Mathematics,Volume 2, 45-49 (2016).

4. Nagoor Gani A. and Rajalaxmi D. (a) Subhashini, Properties of fuzzy labelling graphs, Applied Mathematical Science, Vol.6, no.69-72,pp.3461-3466, (2012).

5. Nagoor Gani. A and Chandrasekaran V.T, A First look at fuzzy graph theory, Allied Publishers Pvt.Ltd (2010).

6. Rosa A. On certain valuations of the vertices of a graph, Theory of graphs, International Symposium, Rome, July (1966), Gordon and Breach, New York and Dunod Paris, 349- 355. (1967).

7. Vaidya S.K and Lekha Bijukumar, Some new graceful graphs, International Journal of Mathematics and Soft Computing. Vol 1, No 1, 37-45, (2011).

8. Zadeh, L. A., Fuzzy sets, Inform. Control 8, 338-353 (1965).

References

Related documents

of the standard amount. Three tablets were weighed and taken into a mortar and crushed into fine powder. An accurately weighed portion of the powder equivalent

Whether and how to deliver sedation in anticipation of weaning of adult patients from prolonged mechanical ventilation is one arena where such opinion-based medi- cine is called for

Additionally, the second portion of this chapter explains the experimental details of the investigation of the unimolecular dissociation of xylyl isomers carried using the VUV

To deepen the observance of business ethics, it is important for the Islamic finance industry to deploy pragmatic and objective models that can be timely applied to warn

Examination of the pain threshold at rest on a manual algometer showed that the martial arts athletes had a significantly higher pain threshold compared to non-athletes.. The

59 &#34;As the predominant form of communication shifts from print to electronic, away from printed volumes of statutes, regulations and court opinions and even

Given the high stability of these small molecules in the extracellular compartment (plasma), their tissue specificity and strong ties with pathological processes underlying multiple

When the Breast Milk Bank was in- itiated, 12 electrical breast pumps were punchased-6 by the Junior League of Evanston and 6 by the Woman’s Auxiliary of the Evanston Hospital; now