(CITACIONJUDICIAL)
NOTICE TO DEFENDANT: (AVISO AL DEMANDADO):
SAMSUNGDSTTERKATIONAL,INC.;CULLIGAN
^RNATIONALCOMPANY;andDOES 1 - 20,Inclusive
YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF: (LO ESTA DEMANDANDO EL DEM AND ANTE):
STATEFARMGENERALINSURANCECOMPANY
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
SuperiorCourtof California. CountyofOrange
04/04/2019 at 03:36:40 PM
Clerk ofthe SuperiorCourt ByBrook Israel.DeputyClerk
The.courtmaydecideagainstyouwithoutyourbeingheardunlessyourespondwithin30days.Readtheintormation NOTICE!Youhavebeensued.
“Tiihave30CALENDARDAYSaftermissummonsandlegal screedonyoutofilea
servedontheplaintiff.Aletterorphonecallwnlln P YoucanfindthesecourtformsandmoreinformationattheCaliforniaCourts case.Theremaybeacourtformthat S vourralntylawlibrary,orthecourthousenearestyou.Ifyoucannotpaythefilingfee,ask “"J'^ofrty'^ur'^responseontime,youmaylosethecasebydefault,andyourwages,money,andproperty maybetakenwithoutfurthernamingfromttwOTU^ attorneyrightaway.Ifyoudonotknowanattorney,youmaywanttocallanattorney
Thereareotherlegal vqumavbeeligibleforfreelegalservicesfromanonprofitlegalservicesprogram.Youcanlocate referralservice.Ifyoucannotaffordanattorn V-^ ^ iawhelpcatifomia.org).theCaliforniaCourtsOnlineSelf-HelpCenter
thesenonprofitgroupsat Cairfomia ^ ba^rassociation.NOTE:Thecourthasastatutorylienforwaivedfeesand
iwww.coumr^fo.ca.gov/selfha^,or inacivilcase.Thecourt’sHenmustbepaidbeforethecourtwilldisrnissthe ;
-“tr?ra/ASDECALE.DAR/0daspudsdsdus,a
Puedeencontrsresfosformutanosdela puebepagarlacuotadapresentacidn.pidaalsecrefanodelecode
“tdl
Sfd»Ta"fnrb
^a
pagorcJorw
podriguitarsusua/do,dlnsroyblenesdinmdssdv8rtende_ i„.„pdlBldmente.Sinoconoceaunabogado,puedallamaraunaetv/oloda
?=b%—ScerfXud^VsC
pagarelgravamendelacodeantesdeguelacodepuedadesecharelcaso.
the
case.
CASENUMBER:
(NOmemdalCaso):
,30-2019-01061907-CU-MP-GC JudgeThoma-sA Delaney
?lXr;d"Jrod“rad"-
Oxange
County
Superior
Court
700 CivicCenter.DriveWest
Thename,address,andtelephonenumberofP'^ntiffs^^^^^'.^f^gndante^odddem^ notieneabogado.es):
'isi
ss."
fo
"c
srs"o"?rc
CA
92,
o
J
9«
a
,6.«
'AiftCjJb Deputy (Adjunto) Clerk,by (SecrefanoJ 04/04/2019DATE: DAWIDH,YATilASAKl.ClerkofrheCourt
Brook Israel
asanindividualdefendant. r>r\cr A
asthepersonsuedunderthefictitiousnameof(speafy). l/UP
3 CS onbehalfoffspec/^J: ^tCkrOfWO^ NyitC\C^4 Ih
C-O CCP416.10(corporation) ^ □ CCP416.60(minor)
i--- 1 CCP41620(defunctcorporation) I ~1 C^CP416.70(conservatee) □ CCP416.40(associationorpartnership) O CCP416.90(authorizedperson)
SI other(spec//y); COf^l^
4. 1 I bypersonaldelivery on(date):
“ SUMMONS 1. [ 2-CS
A
« >H
?♦> s: i/> under: S'-Paoelof1 CodeofCivUPfoccdura§§412,20.465wwiu.eouttnfo.ui.gov
FormAdopiedforMandatoryUse JudicialCoundiofCalifornia
attorneyorpai^ywithoutATTOKNEY: statebarno.: 306345
SSSfioll^r^B^o^ulevard 240^
?S:epI.®n?'."o^9"49-476-9400 faxno.-. 949-476-9407
Plaintiff. State Farnn General Insurance CornRany SUPERIOR cdURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE
(Biventral - 700 Civic Center Dr. West, Santa Ana, CA 92701
n North - 1275 N. Berkeley Ave.; P. 0. Box 5000, Fullerton, CA 92838-0500 □ West - 8141 13“^ Street. Westminster. CA 92683-4593________
State Farm General Insurance Company
FORCOURTUSEONLY
ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of California.
County of Orange
04/19/2019
Clerk of the Superior Court By Isia Vazquez, Deputy Clerk
CASE NUMBER;
30-2019-01061907-CU-NP-CJC PLAINTIFF:
Samsung International, Inc., etal. __________
AWIENDWIENTTO □ COIVIPLAINT □ CROSS-COMPLAINT
DEFENDANT: Caseassignedto:
Judge; Thooias A. Delanev Department: C24
Date complaint filed; 4/4/I y Hearing/lrial date;
FICTITIOUS NAME UNDER SECTION 474, CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (NO ORDER REQUIRED)
u SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
.□Roe,____ to be
---1
discovered the true name of SI Doe, I have
TTth^tpleading. The complaint/cross-complaint is amended to reflect the true name wherever it ap^
April 18,2019 Date;
Juan Salas, Esq.
(TYPEORPRINTNAME)”
(SIGN^UREOFPARTYORATTORNEY)
r^ER REQUIRED) /
INCORRECT NAME UNDER SECTION 473, CODE OF CIVIL PRC^EDURE^ The complaint/cross-complaint incorrectly named the defendant/c
I have discovered the true name of the party to be--- -—(
ss-det^dant as.
amended to reflect the true name wherever it appears in the pleading. I request the complaint/cross-complaint be
Date:
(SIGNAIUkEOFPARIYORATTORNhY) (Ti'PEORPRINTNAME)
ORDER , A
The complaint/cross-complaint is amended to reflect the true Date;_________ _________
wherever it appears in the pleading. name
JUDICIALOFFICER
ApprovedforOptionalUse L-0132(Rev.March2019)
CodeofCivilProcedure. §§473.474
AMENDMENTTO COMPLAINT/CROSS-COMPLAiNT
V.B
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
SuperiorCourt of Californiav
CountyofOrange
04/04/2019 at03:36:40 PM Clerk ofthe SuperiorCourt
BrookIsrael,DeputyClerk JuanSalas,Esq. (SBN306345)
WATKINS &LETOFSKY,LLP 2900SHarborBivd.,Suite240
SantaAna, CA92704 . «„n-j
Office: (949)476-9400;Fax: (949) 476-9407 AttorneyforPlaintiff,STATEFARM generalinsurancecompany
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
SUPERIORCOUKTOFTHESTATEOFCALIFORFHA
FORTHECOUNTYOFORANGE,CENTRALJUSTICECENTER
8 9 10
CaseNo.: 30-2013-010£1307-CU-NP-i:jC AssignedforallPurposestoDept.
TheHonorable
[UnlimitedCivilCase]
STATEFARMGENERALINSURANCE
COMPANY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
VS.
COMPLAINTFORDAMAGES
1. Negligence
2. StrictProductsLiability 3. BreachofImpliedWarranties
trialDATE:NotYetAssigned
14
15 SAMSUNGINTERNATIONAL,me.;
CULLIGANmTERNATIONAL
“11COMPANY;andDOES 1-20,Inclusive,
Defendants.
17 18
Judge ThomasA Delaney
19 20 21
COMES NOW PLAmTIFF, STATE FARM GENERAL mSURANCE COMPANY
11(“Plaintiff’),whoisinformedandbelieves andtheieonallegesagainsttheDefendantsandDoes
23 II
---- 'p207lncliisi've7and'each-ofthem-a£-foUows:--- ■---Plaintiffis a corporation organized and existingrmder the laws ofthe State of atalltimesmentionedherein, qualifiedtodo businessmtheStateof
22
1.
25
California, andis andwas California.
26 27 28
1
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
STF.3204
Defendant, SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL. INC., is a corporation with its atalltimesmentionedherein, qualified 2.
1
headquarters intheState ofNewJersey, andis and todobusinessintheStateofCalifornia.
Defendant. CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, is a corporation
was
2 3
2
4
the State ofIllmois, and is and was at all times mentioned herein, qualified to do located in
5
businessintheStateofCalifornia.
Plaintiff, STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, alleges that
court because the transaction and occurrence (“the incident”) took place at
6
4.
1
this is the proper
1292E SouthStreetAnaheim, California92805.
Plaintiff is ignorant of the true names and capacities of the defendants sued
8 9
5.
10
DOES N20, Inclusive, and therefore sues these defendants by fictitious names. and capacitieswhen ascertained. herein as
11
12 Plaintiffwill amendthis complaintto allegetheirtrue
13 Plaintiffisinformedandbelievesandthereonallegesthatatall timesmentionedherein, eachof 14 thefictitiouslynameddefendantsisnegligently orotherwiseresponsibleinsomemanner, along 15 rviththenameddefendants, fortheoccurrenceshereinalleged,andPlamtiffsdamagesasherem or other wrongful acts and/or names
alleged were legally and proximately caused by that negligence
other acts and/oromissions ofboththenamed andfictitiously
16
omissions and thenegligenceor nameddefendants.
17 18
Plaintiffis informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that at all times herem weU as the fictitiously named defendants, defendants, and in doingthe 6.
19
mentioned, the defendants named in this action, as
and each ofthem, were agents and employees ofthe remaining
thingshereinaftercomplained ofwereactingwithinthecourse and scopeofsuchagency and/or ploymentandwiththeknowledgeandconsentoftheremainingdefendants,
about“May'-2: 201-8—a-water-loss-occurred-at—1-292-E-South--Street,
20 21 22 em 23
rr
On or 24California, the home of Plaintiff’s insured, Kairbek Shakman, causing significant Anaheim,
property damage. Theinsured’sSamsungbrandFrenchdoorrefirigerator,modelRF4287HARS and serialnumber 102043CZ400453R(manufactured April,2010) leakedwatermtothekitchen
25 26 27 28
2
COMPLAINTFORDAMAGES
STF.3204
and sunounding areas when thefilter in the refrigerator burst. The filter is a CuUigan brand, model CW-S2. with a marking of‘T12n7H.” The filter is intended to replace the Samsung brand refrigerator filters. The insured purchasedthe refrigerator in February of2014 and had month before atrip abroad in March of2018. The insured Plaintiff’s
1
2 3
replacedthe water filter about
returned from the trip in late April and about two days later the failure occurred.
destructively examined the subject water filter, constructed of a plastic one 4 5 non expert engineer 6 water. The filtermediaintended to removetastes and odors from potable
filter contains a fracture that bifurcates at multiple locations. The fracture separated the top eceived attached toits head assembly. The casing and aninner
1
8
portion ofthefilter andthis separatedportion
consistentwithfreezing and no signofimpactthatwould havecontributedto wasr
9
10 failurepattern is
thefailurewasfound. This styleoffilteristypicallyinstalledinanareathatwouldbeprotected ,, from direct impactby aplastic cover. During failure, asthecrack drivingforce increasesand ,3 fire crackvelocity issufficientlyhigh, a singlecrackfrontbegins to spht up into many smaller
and diverge outward alongside each other but at
11
crack fi-onts. These continue to propagate
slightly differentcrackangles. Thelikelihood ofcrackbifurcationincreaseswiththemagnitude d dependonthetoughness ofthematerial. Therefore,thebifurcationof
14 15
oftheapplied forces
the fracture indicates a high stress with a rapidly propagating fracture or an 16 a low material 11 toughness. 18
intended to be installed in the refrigeration a similar fracture The subject filter model is
8.
19
Numerous refrigerator filters displaying compartment of the refiigerator.
sistent withfreezinghavebeenpreviouslyreceived bytheengineer. Inotherfilters dmilar failure mode, the filters failed due to freezing and thefreezing ofthe
20
pattern con received with a
21
22
Insome casesthethermostatthatcontrols filtershasbeencausedby arefrigeratormalfunction.
tffeopSingand-crosmgof'the-damperfails-to-function-properly-and-fiie.-filter--is-subjected,.to. Inothercases thedamperdooritselffailsandnolongerblockstheentryof
23
24
freezingconditions.
25
One website lists replacement of multiple cold air into the refiigerator compartment.
26
as the solutionto a “Refrigerator freezing food” malfunction for temperature controlling parts
21
28
COMPLAINTFORDAMAGES
STF.3204
an exemplarSamsungbrand refrigerator. Additionally,theinsured stated thatfood inthe back ofthesubjectrefrigeratorwasfreezingattimes.
Plaintiff,
1
2
STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, is informed 9.
3
and believes, and thereon alleges, thatthe water that leaked into Plaintiffs insured’s property originated &om the subject Samsung refrigerator. CuUigan water filter and/or their component manufactured, designed, distributed, inspected, supplied and/or sold by
4
5
parts, that were
Defendants, SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL, INC., CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL
6
7
COMPANY, andDOES 1-20,inclusive.
8
RTRST GAUSFOR ACTIONFORNEGLIGENCE
9
[AgainstAllDefendants]
10. Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 9 as though fully set
10 11 forthherein. 12 INC., CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL, SAMSUNG
INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, andDOES 1-20, inclusive, had a duty to use reasonablecare withrespecttothemanufacture, design, distribution, inspection, supply and/or sale ofthe subject
11. Defendants,
13 14 15
16 refrigerator,waterfilterand/ortheircomponentparts.
12. Defendants, SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL, INC., CULLIGAN
17
INTERNATIONALCOMPANY, andDOES L20,inclusive,negligentlymanufactured,designecL and/or sold the subject refrigerator, water filter and/or their
18
distributed, inspected, supplied
componentpartsand/orneghgentlyfailedto issueadequateinstruction or warnings regardingthe filter and/or their component parts, suchthat the subjectrefiigerator,
19
20
subject refrigerator, water
filter and/or their component parts left Defendants' possession
21
or control in a defective water
condition, withmanufacturing and/or design defects and/orinsufficient instruction or warning of ^ty anri/nr installation instructions"df'the'suBjecfTefrigerator.-water-filter and/or-theu-manufacturer, designer, distributer, inspector, supplier and/or seller is
22 23
24
component parts. A
negligent ifitfailstousetheamountofcareinmanufacturing,designing, distributing, inspecting, supplying and/or sellingthe productthata reasonably carefulmanufacturer, designer, distributer,
25
26
27 28
4
COMPLAINTFORDAMAGES
STF.3204
use insimilarcircumstances to avoid exposingothers to a inspector, supplierand/or seller-would
foreseeableriskofharm. In determiningwhether Defendantsusedreasonablecare, atrier offact or should haveknown about the lilcelihood and severit}' of
1
2
shall balancewhat Defendants knew
potentialharmfromtheproductagainsttheburdenoftakingsafet>'measurestoreduceoravoidthe
3
4
harm.
5
thepart ofDefendants and each of The afore-described acts and/or omissions
themcausedwatertoleak andescapeinsidetheinsured’spropertyfromthe subjectrefrigerator, water filterand/ortheircomponentparts, and to flood Plaintiff’s insured’s property on or about
May2, 2018,’andharmedPlaintiffsinsuredand Plaintiff
afore-describedactsand/oromissionsofDefendantsandeachofthemwerethe on 13. 6 1 8 9 14. The
legalandproximatecauseofdamagestoPlaintiffsinsuredandtoPlaintiff.
15. Theactsand/oromissionsofDefendantsandeachofthemwereasubstantialfactor
10 11 12
incausingharmtoPlaintiffsinsuredandtoPlaintiff.
result ofthe negligence ofDefendants andeach ofthem, Plaintiffsinsured
13
16. As a
sustainedatleast$87,921.90 indamages. Plaintiffpaidtooronbehalfofitsmsuredtheamountof $87,921.90,todate, andfurthermonetary damages areexpected andwiUbe accordingtoproofat includes Plaintiffs insured’s $1,456.00 deductible, which is recoverable by
14 15 16
trial. This sum
17
Plaintiff, STATE FARM GENERAL
Plaintiff under the respective policy of insurance.
18
INSURANCE COMPANTY, fulfilled its obligationspursuanttothe insurance agreementbetween Plaintiff, STATE FARM
19
Plaintiff and Plaintiffs insured, for the property damage losses.
20
seeksrecovery, by -way ofa subrogation claim, for
GENERALINSURANCE COMPANY, now
the indemnity and other damagesPlaintiffpaidto
and pending, plus other misceUaneous damages, costs, and pre-judgment
21
behalfofits insured inthe approximate or on
22
amount of$87,921.90,
interestffomthedateofloss,accordingtoproofattrial.
STr.rnNn
TATTSF.
of actionFOR
STRICT
PRODUCTS
LIABILIIY
23
24
25
[AgainstallDefendants]
Plaintiffincorporatesbyreferenceparagraphs 1 through16 asthoughfullysetforth
26
17.
27 28
5
COMPLAINTFORDAMAGES
STF.3204
herein. 1 INC., CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL, SAMSUNG 18. Defendants, 2
INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, and DOES 1-20, inclusive, manufactured, designed,
and/or sold the subject re&igerator, water filter and/or their manufacturing defects, insufficient instructions
3
distributed, inspected, supplied
component parts such that the product contained
and/or warnings ofpotential safety hazards and/or design defects when the products left said
4
5
6
Defendants’ possessionor control-19. The subject refrigerator,
7
filter and/or their component parts contained a water
8
9 manufacturing defect (aproduct contains amanufacturing defect ifthe product differs from the 10 manufacturer’sdesignorspecificationsorfromothertypicalunits ofthesameproductline)and/or 11 IIdesigndefect(ConsumerExpectationTest-thatthe subjectrefrigerator and/orwaterfilterdidnot
ordinary consumerwouldhave expectedthem to perform when used or 12 perform as safely
13 11misused in an intended or reasonably foreseeable way) or (Risk Benefit Test - once Plamtiff
. ThatDefendantsmanufactured/distributed/soldtheproduct;2. That as an
14 provesallofthefollowing: 1
15 Plaintiffwasharmed;and3.Thatthe[productj’sdesignwasasubstantialfactormcausmgharmto 16 11Plaintiffthen Plaintiffprevails unless Defendantsprove thatthebenefits oftheproduct’s design
outweigh therisks ofthedesignconsidering (a) The gravityofthepotentialharm resultingfrom occur; (c) The feasibility ofan
17
ofthe product; (b) The lilcelihoodthatthis harm would 18 the use
19 alternative safer designatthe time ofmanufacture; (d) The cost ofan alternative design; and (e) 20 ilhe disadvantages of an alternative design; and (f) Oflier relevant factors) when it left the
INC.. CULLIGAN
SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL,
of Defendants, 21 possession
22 INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, and DOES 1-20, inclusive, and failed to issue adequate 23 instmctionsorwarningsregardingthesubjectrefrigerator,waterfilterand/ortheircomponentparts 24 [(1. That Defendants^ufa’cti^id7distributed/soldtheTroductr2nharthe-product had
potential-25 risksthatwereknownorknowableinlightofthescientificItnowledgethatwasgeneraUy accepted 26 inthe scientificcommunit)' atthetimeofmanufacture/distribution/sale; 3. Thatthepotentialnsks is usedor misusedin an intended or reasonably' 27 presented asubstantial dangerwhentheproduct is
28
6
COMPLAINTFORDAMAGES
STF.3204
Thatordinaryconsumerswouldnothaverecognizedthepotentialrisks;5. That instruct of the potential risks; 6. That Plaintiff
was a substantial factor in foreseeablewa}';4-.
Defendants failed to adequately
harmed; and 7. That the lack of sufficient instructions or warnings
1
was
warn or
2 3
causingPlaintiff’sharm).
20 Plaintiffsinsuredbecametheuserofthedefectiveproduct. At the lime ofthe incident described herein, the product
intended by Defendants and/or in areasonably foreseeable manner and/or misused in a
4
5
being used in the was
21.
6
manner
7
reasonablyforeseeablemanner.
The afore-described acts and/or omissions on the part ofDefendants and each of inside Plaintiffs insured’s home firom the subject and/or their component parts, and to damage Plaintiffs insured s
e
22.
8
them caused water to leak and escape
10
refrigerator, water filter
propertyonoraboutMay2, 2018,andharmedPlaintiffsinsuredandPlaintiff.
23. Theafore-describeddefectiverefiigerator,waterfilterand/ortheircomponentparts
11 12 13
werethelegalandproximatecauseofdamagestoPlaintiff’sinsuredandtoPlamtiff. 24. Theactsand/or omissionsofDefendantsandeachofthemwere
14
asubstantialfactor
15
incausingharmtoPlaintiffsinsuredandtoPlaintiff.
resultofthemanufacture, design, distribution, inspection, supply and/or sale filter and/or their componentparts by Defendants, SAMSUNG
16
25. As a
17
ofthe subjectrefiigerator, water
INTERNATIONAL, INC., CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, and DOES 1-20,
inclusive, with manufacturing, inadequate warnings, and/or design defects, Plamtiffs insured in damages for repairs, restoration and/or
IB 19
20
sustained approximately $87,921.90, and pending, replacement of property,
fulfilledits obligations pursuantto the insuranceagreement betweenPlaintiffand its msured and ^^imb^ed Plaintiffs inged for alllosses. pramtiH,“STATE
FARM-GENERAL-INSURANGE-COMPANY, now seeks recovery, by way of a subrogation claim, for the mdemmty and other damagesPlaintiffpaidtooronbehalfofitsinsuredintheapproximateamountof$87,921.90 pending,plus othermiscellaneousdamages, costs,andpre-judgmentinterestffomthedateofloss,
21
Plaintiff, STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
22 23 24 25 ,and 26 27 28 7
COMPLAINTFORDAMAGES
STF.3204
accordingtoproofattrial.
THIRDrATTSEOFACTTONFORBREACHOFIMPLIEDWARRANTffiS
[AgainstallDefendants]
26. Plaintiffincorporatesbyreferenceparagraphs 1 through25asthoughfullysetforth
1 2 3 4 herein. 5 CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL, INC., SAMSUNG Defendants,
INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, and DOES 1-20, inclusive, manufactured, designed,
inspected, suppUed and/or sold the subject reftigerator, water filter and/or their component parts such that the product contained manufacturing defects, insufficient instmctions
ofpotential safety hazards and/or design defects when the product left 27. 6 7 distributed, 8 9 said and/or warnings 10
Defendants’ possessionorcontrol.
As a result. Defendants, SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL, INC., CULLIGAN
11
28.
12
INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, and DOES 1-20, inclusive, breachedthe implied warranty of installed at Plaintiffs insured’s
13
merchantability. The subject refrigerator and water filter
, and at the time. Defendants, SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL, INC., CULLIGAN were
14
property
INTERNATIONALCOMPAN^Y,andDOES 1-20,inclusive,wereinthebusinessofsellingthese goods and/orhelditselfoutashavingspecialknowledge orskiUregardingthesegoods;thesubject not of the same quality as those
15 16 17
refrigerator, water filter and/or their component parts were
generallyacceptableinthetrade;and/orwasnotfitfortheordinarypurposesforwhichsuchgoods
18 19
areused.
20
result. Defendants, SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL, INC., CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, andDOES 1-20, inclusive,breached theImphed Warrantyof FitnessforaParticularpurpose. Thesubjectrefiigerator,waterfilter and/ortheircomponentparts were installed at Plaintiff’s insured’s proper!}', and at the time. Defendants,
SAMSUNG-INTERNATIONAL, INC., CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, and DOES 1-20,
know that consumers intended to use the subject refrigerator,
29. As a 21 22 23 24 25
inclusive, knew or had reason to
waterfilter and/ortheircomponent partsforaparticularpurposeand wererely-ingonthe skill and
26
27 28
8
COMPLAINTFORDAMAGES
STF.3204
CULLIGAN INTERKATIONAL, INC.,
SAMSUNG Defendants,
judgment of
INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, and DOES 1-20, inclusive, tofurnish arefrigerator and water filter suitable forthe particular purpose; and Plaintiffs insuredjustifiablyrelied on Defendants, SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL, INC., CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, and DOES 1-20,
1
2 3
4
inclusive,skiUandjudgmentandthatthe subjectrefrigerator,waterfilterand/ortheir notsuitablefortheparticularpurposewhenoneorbothcomponentsfailed
5
componentpartswere
6
andcausedawaterlossand extensivepropertydamage.
30. The afore-described acts and/or omissions onthepart ofDefendants and each of inside Plaintiffs insured’s home from the subject
7 8
them caused water to leak and escape
refrigerator,waterfilterand/ortheircomponentpartsandtodamagePlaintiffs insured’sproperty
9 10
onoraboutMay2.2018, andharmedPlaintiffsinsuredandPlaintiff.
Theafore-described defectiverefiigerator,waterfilterand/or theircomponentparts
11
31.
12
werethelegalandproximatecauseofdamagestoPlaintiffsinsuredandtoPlaintiff.
32. Theactsand/oromissionsofDefendants andeachofthemwereasubstantial factor
13 14
incausinghanntoPlaintiffsinsuredandtoPlaintiff.
33. Asaresultofthebreachoftheimpliedwarrantiesofmerchantabilityandoffitness ofthe subject refrigerator, water filter and/or their component parts by
15 16
or a particular purpose
Defendants, SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL, INC., CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL COMPANY and DOES 1-20, inclusive. Plaintiffs insured sustained approximately $87,921.90, andpending,indamagesforrepairs,restorationand/orreplacementofproperty. Plaintiff, STATE
arm general INSURANCE COMPANY, fulfilledits obligationspursuanttotheinsurance
17 18 19
20
21
insured and reimbursed Plaintiffs insured for all losses. agreement between Plaintiff and its
Plaintiff, STATEFARMGENERALINSURANCE COMPANY,now Ti^r^ation claim, for the"ind^mnityi and~oth^damages Pimtiff pmd
insuredintheapproximateamountof$87,921.90,andpending,plusothermiscellaneousdamages,
22
seeks recovery,by wayof ■to“or"on“behalf-ofits
23
24
25
andpre-judgmentinterestfromthedateofloss,accordingtoproofattrial.
costs, 26 /// 27 28 9
COMPLAINTFORDAMAGES
STF.3204
PRAYER
for judgment against Defendants, SAMSUNG
1
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays
INTERNATIONAL, INC., CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, and DOES 1-20,
2 3
inclusive,andeachofthem,asfollows.
All damages Plaintiff paid to or $87,921.90,continuingandaccordingtoproof;
ForcostsofsuitincurredbyPlaintiffherein;
4
behalf of its insured in the amount of on 1. 5 6 2. 7
Forpre-judgmentinterestaccordingtoproofattrial; 3.
8
ly andall suchrehefasthecourtmaydeemjustandproper. Submitted, For
4.
9
Resped
WATKINS&teXCffSW, .,2019 DATED: April / 10 11 / 12 By: ^ANSA^AS /AttomeyforPlaintiff,
STATEFARMGENERAL
INSURANCECOMPANY
13 14 15 16
STF.3204.STFv.SamsungInternational,Inc.;CulliganinternationalCompanyComplainLdoc
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 10
COMPLAINTFORDAMAGES STF.3204
2900SHarborBlvd.,Suite240
®“TCL™™‘lto^^94t476-9400 949-476-9407
... Mff.stateFarmGeneralInsuranceCompgaZ
SUPERIORCOURTOFCALIFORNIA,COUNTYOF ORANGE
700CivicCenterDnve West SantaAna 92701
CentralJusticeCenter_____
SupBriorCourtof California, CountyofOrange 04/04/2019 at03:36:40 PM
Clerk ofthe Superior Conn Brook IsraeLDeputyClerk
STREETADDRESS: MAILINGADDRESS: CITYAND21PCODE: BRANCHNAME:
vs.SAMSUNGINTERNATIONAL.INC..ETAL.
CASENUMBER:
30-2019-010G1907-CU-NP-aC JudgeThomas A Delaney ComplexCaseDesignation
1 Counter □ Joinder
CIVILCASECOVERSHEET
[ I Limited (Amount demandedis
$25,000orless)_______________________
1-6belowmustbecompleted(seeinstructionsonpage2).
Checkoneboxbelowforthecasetypethatbestdescribesthiscase: Contract I BreachofconkaclAwarranty(06) I Rule3.740collections(09) I Othercollections(09) Insurancecoverage(18) I Otherwntract(37) ealProperty I Eminentdomain/inverse condemnation(14) ~n Wrongfuleviction(33)
~n Ottterrealproperty(26) I / I Unlimited
(Amount demanded exceeds$25,000)
JUDGE:
Filedwithfirstappearancebydefendant
(Cal.RulesofCourt,rule3.402) DEPT:
1 ProvisionallyComplexCivilLitigation
(Cal.RulesofCourt,rules3.400-3.403) I I Antitrust/Traderegulation(03) LJ Constructiondefect(10) I 1 Masstort(40)
LJ Securitieslitigation(28) I I EnvlronmBntal/Toxictort(30)
I I Insurancecoverageclaimsarisingfromthe abovelistedprovisionallycomplexcase types(41)
EnforcementofJudgment I ~l Enforcementofjudgment(20) MiscellaneousCivilComplaint □ RICO(27)
I I othercomplaint(notspedfiedabove)(42)
AutoTort -1__ I Auto(22)
I 1 Uninsuredmotorist(46)
OtherPl/PD/WD(PersonalInjury/Property DamageWrongfulDeath)Tort
I Asbestos(04) 1 Productliability(24)
I Medicalmalpractice(45)
I OtherPl/PD/WD(23) Non-Pl/PD/WD(Other)Tort
LJ Businesstort/unfairbusinesspractice(07) i I Civilrights(OS)
LJ Defamation(13) □ Fraud(16)
LJ Intellectualproperty(19)
LJ Professionalnegligence(25) m Othernon-PI/PD/WDtort(35)
Employment
i I WrongfulterminaUon(36) I I Otheremployment(15)
2 ThiRrase I [
factorsrequiringexceptionalJudicialmanagement: a.[ID Largenumberofseparatelyrepresentedparties b.□ Extensivemotionpracticeraisingdifficultornovel
issuesthatwillbetime-consumingtoresolve c.im Substantialamountofdocumentaryevidence
inlawfulDetainer I Commercial(31) I Residential(32)
IZI Drugs(38)
MiscellaneousCivilPetition
I n Partnershipandcorporategovernance(21) JudicialReview
Assetforfeiture(05)
1 Petitionre:arbitrationaward(11) \ \ otherpetition(notspec///edabove)(43) I I Writofmandate(02)
" 1 Otherjudicialreviev/(39)_____________ __________ — . . ---I / I isnot complexunderrule3.400oftheCaliforniaRulesofCourt.Ifthecaseiscomplex,markthe
d.CZlLargenumberofwitnesses
e.I 1Coordinationwithrelatedactionspendinginoneormorecourts inothercounties,states,orcountries,orinafederalcourt f I ISubstantialpostjudgmentjudicialsupervision
3. Remediessough.(ot,eoKa//tha.apply):a,[Zl monetary bQ nonmonete^;^.^ nTXoVCliedSaties
4. Numbbrofcausesofaction(specify): Thi'ee-Negligence, StnctPro/itictsLiabJity,BreachofImpliedWananh
I IIs I V Iisnot aclassactionsuit. X j
lyknownrelatedcases,fileandserveanoticeofrelated^se.(Youmayi4se 5. Thiscase 6. Ifthereare Date: April,^_ JuanSaias,gsq. 151 ifTTJCl ^2019
►
V-ORATTORNEYFORPARTY) /SIGNATUREOFPAR'
fTYPEORPRINTNMviE)
: youmustse^eacopyofthiscovershea,ona„
. ESSlecfons°ia’’se?nder?uie3.740oraoompiexcase,thiscoversheetwillbeusedforstatisticalpurposesoni^^^^
Cel.RulesofCourt,ailas2.30.X22D,3.400-3.403,3.740; CaLStandardsofJutCcia!Administration,std.3.10 www.courf/nfb.ce.pw
CIVILCASECOVERSHEET
FormAdoptedforMandatoryUse JudicialCouncilofCalifornia
T ■ t-ffc nthprc; Filina First Papers. If you arefiling a first paper (for example, a complaint) in a civil case you must ,To Plaintiffs and Others Fi 9 ^ . . _ CoverSheetcontainedonpage 1. Thisinformationwillbeusedtocompile
completeandfile along You mustcomplete items 1 through 6onthesheet. In item 1.youmustcheck
statisticsabout ^ beTfdescribesthecase. Ifthecasefitsbothageneralandamore specifictypeofcaselistedinitem1,
:Heor.^rorefpLlfone ,f.He.sehas™^
Wit^-«-P- ^ subje.apany,
orbothtosanctionsunderrules2.30and3.220oftheCaliforniaRulesofCourt.
T P.rfipc in Rule 3740 CollectionsCases. A"collections case" under rule3.740isdefined asan action forrecovery ofmoney
To Parties in $25,000.exclusiveofinterestandattorney'sfees, arisingfromatransactionin
owed inasumstatedto acauiredoncredit. Acollectionscasedoesnotincludeanactionseekingthefollowing: (1)tort whichproperty,sen/ices. y real property (4) recovery of personal property, or (5) a prejudgment writ of damages, of’a caseas a^rule 3.740^cofiections case onthisform meansthat itwill be exempt fromthegeneral
“en,ii'"emrand rules, unlessa defendantfilesaresponsive pleadinp. A rule 3.740colleofions
casttilbesubiedtotherequirementsforserviceandobtainingajudgmentinrule3.740. „ ,k ,1,
casewilloesu j m , ^ies must also usethe CivilCase CoverSheetto designatewhetherthe To Parties in thecaseiscomptex underrule3.400oftheCalifornia Rules ofCourt,thismustbeindicated by case IScomplex. Ifa plaintiffRelievestherase isco^x un designatesa caseascomplex,thecoversheetmustbeservedwiththe completing'heappropnae ^^^^da^Zy 'leand serve no laterthanthe time ofitsfirst appearance ajoinderin the plaTnfiffsdSigrafcn,acounter-designationthatthecaseisnotcomplex,or.ittheplaintiffhasmadenodesignation,adesignationthat itscounsel,
CASETYPESANDEXAMPLES thecaseiscomplex.
ProvisionallyComplexCivilLitigation(Cal. RulesofCourtRules3.400-3.403)
Antitrust/TradeRegulation(03) ConstructionDefect(10) ClaimsInvolvingMassTort(40) SecuritiesLitigation(28) Environmental/ToxicTort(30) InsuranceCoverageClaims
(arisingfromprovisionaliycomplex
casetypelistedabove)(41) EnforcementofJudgment
EnforcementofJudgment(20) AbstractofJudgment(Outof
County)
ConfessionofJudgment fnon-domesficrelations)
SisterStateJudgment AdministrativeAgencyAward
I'nofunpaidfaxes)
Petition/CertificationofEntryof JudgmentonUnpaidTaxes . OtherEnforcementofJudgment
Case
MiscellaneousCivilComplaint RICO(27)
OtherComplaintfnofspecified
above)(42)
DeclaratoryReliefOnly InjunctiveReliefOnly
(non-harassment)
MechanicsLien
OtherCommercialComplaint Case(non-tort/non-complex)
OtherCivilComplaint
(non-tort/non-cx)mplex)
MiscellaneousCivilPetition PartnershipandCorporate
Governance(21) OtherPetition(nofspecified
above)(43) CivilHarassment WorkplaceViolence Elder/DependentAdult Abuse ElectionContest PetitionforNameChange PetitionforReliefFromLate
Claim OtherCivilPetition Contract
BreachofContract/Warranty(06) BreachofRental/Lease
Contract(nofunlawfuldetainer orv/rongfuleviction)
ContractA/VarrantyBreach-Seller Plaintiff(notfraudornegligence)
NegligentBreachofContract/ Warranty
OtherBreachofContract/Warranty Collections(e.g.,moneyowed,open
bookaccounts)(09)
CollectionCase-SellerPlaintiff OtherPromissoryNote/CoHections InsuranceCoverage(notprovisionally
mmplex)(18) AutoSubrogation OtherCoverage AutoTort
Auto(22)-PersonaiInjury/Property Damage/WrongfulDeath UninsuredMotorist(46){ifthe
caseinvolvesanuninsured motoristclaimsubjectto arbitration,chec/fthisitem insteadofAuto)
OtherPI/PD/WD(PersonalInjury/ PropertyDamage/WrongfulDeath) Tort
Asbestos(04)
AsbestosPropertyDamage AsbestosPersonalInjury/
WrongfulDeath ProductLiabilityfnofasbestosor
toxic/environmental)(24) MedicalMalpractice(45)
Medical Malpractice-Physicians&Surgeons OtherProfessionalHealthCare
Malpractice OtherPI/PD/WD(23)
PremisesLiability(e.g.,slip andfall)
IntentionalBodilyInjury/PD/WD (e.g.,assault,vandalism) intentionalInflictionof
EmotionalDistress NegligentInflictionof
EmotionalDistress OtherPI/PD/WD Non-PI/PD/WD(Other)Tort
BusinessTort/UnfairBusiness Practice(07)
CivilRights(e.g.,discrimination, falsearrest)fnofcivil
harassment)(08)
Defamation(e.g.,slander,libel)
OtherContract(37) ContractualFraud OtherContractDispute RealProperty
EminentDomain/Inverse Condemnation(14) WrongfulEviction(33)
OtherRealProperty(e.g..quiettitle)(26) WritofPossessionofRealProperty MortgageForeclosure
QuietTitle
OtherRealProperty(noteminent
domain,landlord/tenant,or foreclosure)
UnlawfulDetainer Commercial(31) Residential(32)
Drugs(38)(ifthecaseinvolvesillegal drugs,checkthisitem;otherwise, reportasCommercialorResidential)
JudicialReview AssetForfeiture(05)
PetitionRe;ArbitrationAward(11) WritofMandate(02)
Writ-AdministrativeMandamus Writ-MandamusonLimitedCourt (13)
Fraud(16)
IntellectualProperty(19) ProfessionalNegligence(25)
LegalMalpractice
OtherProfessionalMalpractice (nofmedicalorlegal)
OtherNon-PI/PD/WDTort(35) Employment
WrongfulTermination(36) OtherEmployment(15)
CaseMatter
Writ-OtherLimitedCourtCase Review
OtherJudicialReview(39) ReviewofHealthOfficerOrder NoticeofAppeal-Labor
CommissionerAppeals
Page2of2
CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET