• No results found

Case 8:19-cv Document 1-1 Filed 05/23/19 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:7 EXHIBIT "1"

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Case 8:19-cv Document 1-1 Filed 05/23/19 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:7 EXHIBIT "1""

Copied!
15
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)
(2)

(CITACIONJUDICIAL)

NOTICE TO DEFENDANT: (AVISO AL DEMANDADO):

SAMSUNGDSTTERKATIONAL,INC.;CULLIGAN

^RNATIONALCOMPANY;andDOES 1 - 20,Inclusive

YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF: (LO ESTA DEMANDANDO EL DEM AND ANTE):

STATEFARMGENERALINSURANCECOMPANY

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

SuperiorCourtof California. CountyofOrange

04/04/2019 at 03:36:40 PM

Clerk ofthe SuperiorCourt ByBrook Israel.DeputyClerk

The.courtmaydecideagainstyouwithoutyourbeingheardunlessyourespondwithin30days.Readtheintormation NOTICE!Youhavebeensued.

“Tiihave30CALENDARDAYSaftermissummonsandlegal screedonyoutofilea

servedontheplaintiff.Aletterorphonecallwnlln P YoucanfindthesecourtformsandmoreinformationattheCaliforniaCourts case.Theremaybeacourtformthat S vourralntylawlibrary,orthecourthousenearestyou.Ifyoucannotpaythefilingfee,ask “"J'^ofrty'^ur'^responseontime,youmaylosethecasebydefault,andyourwages,money,andproperty maybetakenwithoutfurthernamingfromttwOTU^ attorneyrightaway.Ifyoudonotknowanattorney,youmaywanttocallanattorney

Thereareotherlegal vqumavbeeligibleforfreelegalservicesfromanonprofitlegalservicesprogram.Youcanlocate referralservice.Ifyoucannotaffordanattorn V-^ ^ iawhelpcatifomia.org).theCaliforniaCourtsOnlineSelf-HelpCenter

thesenonprofitgroupsat Cairfomia ^ ba^rassociation.NOTE:Thecourthasastatutorylienforwaivedfeesand

iwww.coumr^fo.ca.gov/selfha^,or inacivilcase.Thecourt’sHenmustbepaidbeforethecourtwilldisrnissthe ;

-“tr?ra/ASDECALE.DAR/0daspudsdsdus,a

Puedeencontrsresfosformutanosdela puebepagarlacuotadapresentacidn.pidaalsecrefanodelecode

“tdl

Sfd»Ta"fnrb

^a

pagorcJorw

podriguitarsusua/do,dlnsroyblenesdinmdssdv8rtende_ i„.„pdlBldmente.Sinoconoceaunabogado,puedallamaraunaetv/oloda

?=b%—ScerfXud^VsC

pagarelgravamendelacodeantesdeguelacodepuedadesecharelcaso.

the

case.

CASENUMBER:

(NOmemdalCaso):

,30-2019-01061907-CU-MP-GC JudgeThoma-sA Delaney

?lXr;d"Jrod“rad"-

Oxange

County

Superior

Court

700 CivicCenter.DriveWest

Thename,address,andtelephonenumberofP'^ntiffs^^^^^'.^f^gndante^odddem^ notieneabogado.es):

'isi

ss."

fo

"c

srs"o"?rc

CA

92,

o

J

a

,6.«

'AiftCjJb Deputy (Adjunto) Clerk,by (SecrefanoJ 04/04/2019

DATE: DAWIDH,YATilASAKl.ClerkofrheCourt

Brook Israel

asanindividualdefendant. r>r\cr A

asthepersonsuedunderthefictitiousnameof(speafy). l/UP

3 CS onbehalfoffspec/^J: ^tCkrOfWO^ NyitC\C^4 Ih

C-O CCP416.10(corporation) ^ □ CCP416.60(minor)

i--- 1 CCP41620(defunctcorporation) I ~1 C^CP416.70(conservatee) □ CCP416.40(associationorpartnership) O CCP416.90(authorizedperson)

SI other(spec//y); COf^l^

4. 1 I bypersonaldelivery on(date):

“ SUMMONS 1. [ 2-CS

A

« >

H

?♦> s: i/> under: S'-Paoelof1 CodeofCivUPfoccdura§§412,20.465

wwiu.eouttnfo.ui.gov

FormAdopiedforMandatoryUse JudicialCoundiofCalifornia

(3)

attorneyorpai^ywithoutATTOKNEY: statebarno.: 306345

SSSfioll^r^B^o^ulevard 240^

?S:epI.®n?'."o^9"49-476-9400 faxno.-. 949-476-9407

Plaintiff. State Farnn General Insurance CornRany SUPERIOR cdURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE

(Biventral - 700 Civic Center Dr. West, Santa Ana, CA 92701

n North - 1275 N. Berkeley Ave.; P. 0. Box 5000, Fullerton, CA 92838-0500 □ West - 8141 13“^ Street. Westminster. CA 92683-4593________

State Farm General Insurance Company

FORCOURTUSEONLY

ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of California.

County of Orange

04/19/2019

Clerk of the Superior Court By Isia Vazquez, Deputy Clerk

CASE NUMBER;

30-2019-01061907-CU-NP-CJC PLAINTIFF:

Samsung International, Inc., etal. __________

AWIENDWIENTTO □ COIVIPLAINT □ CROSS-COMPLAINT

DEFENDANT: Caseassignedto:

Judge; Thooias A. Delanev Department: C24

Date complaint filed; 4/4/I y Hearing/lrial date;

FICTITIOUS NAME UNDER SECTION 474, CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (NO ORDER REQUIRED)

u SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.

.□Roe,____ to be

---1

discovered the true name of SI Doe, I have

TTth^tpleading. The complaint/cross-complaint is amended to reflect the true name wherever it ap^

April 18,2019 Date;

Juan Salas, Esq.

(TYPEORPRINTNAME)”

(SIGN^UREOFPARTYORATTORNEY)

r^ER REQUIRED) /

INCORRECT NAME UNDER SECTION 473, CODE OF CIVIL PRC^EDURE^ The complaint/cross-complaint incorrectly named the defendant/c

I have discovered the true name of the party to be--- -—(

ss-det^dant as.

amended to reflect the true name wherever it appears in the pleading. I request the complaint/cross-complaint be

Date:

(SIGNAIUkEOFPARIYORATTORNhY) (Ti'PEORPRINTNAME)

ORDER , A

The complaint/cross-complaint is amended to reflect the true Date;_________ _________

wherever it appears in the pleading. name

JUDICIALOFFICER

ApprovedforOptionalUse L-0132(Rev.March2019)

CodeofCivilProcedure. §§473.474

AMENDMENTTO COMPLAINT/CROSS-COMPLAiNT

V.B

(4)

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

SuperiorCourt of Californiav

CountyofOrange

04/04/2019 at03:36:40 PM Clerk ofthe SuperiorCourt

BrookIsrael,DeputyClerk JuanSalas,Esq. (SBN306345)

WATKINS &LETOFSKY,LLP 2900SHarborBivd.,Suite240

SantaAna, CA92704 . «„n-j

Office: (949)476-9400;Fax: (949) 476-9407 AttorneyforPlaintiff,STATEFARM generalinsurancecompany

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

SUPERIORCOUKTOFTHESTATEOFCALIFORFHA

FORTHECOUNTYOFORANGE,CENTRALJUSTICECENTER

8 9 10

CaseNo.: 30-2013-010£1307-CU-NP-i:jC AssignedforallPurposestoDept.

TheHonorable

[UnlimitedCivilCase]

STATEFARMGENERALINSURANCE

COMPANY,

12

Plaintiff,

13

VS.

COMPLAINTFORDAMAGES

1. Negligence

2. StrictProductsLiability 3. BreachofImpliedWarranties

trialDATE:NotYetAssigned

14

15 SAMSUNGINTERNATIONAL,me.;

CULLIGANmTERNATIONAL

“11COMPANY;andDOES 1-20,Inclusive,

Defendants.

17 18

Judge ThomasA Delaney

19 20 21

COMES NOW PLAmTIFF, STATE FARM GENERAL mSURANCE COMPANY

11(“Plaintiff’),whoisinformedandbelieves andtheieonallegesagainsttheDefendantsandDoes

23 II

---- 'p207lncliisi've7and'each-ofthem-a£-foUows:--- ■---Plaintiffis a corporation organized and existingrmder the laws ofthe State of atalltimesmentionedherein, qualifiedtodo businessmtheStateof

22

1.

25

California, andis andwas California.

26 27 28

1

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

STF.3204

(5)

Defendant, SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL. INC., is a corporation with its atalltimesmentionedherein, qualified 2.

1

headquarters intheState ofNewJersey, andis and todobusinessintheStateofCalifornia.

Defendant. CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, is a corporation

was

2 3

2

4

the State ofIllmois, and is and was at all times mentioned herein, qualified to do located in

5

businessintheStateofCalifornia.

Plaintiff, STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, alleges that

court because the transaction and occurrence (“the incident”) took place at

6

4.

1

this is the proper

1292E SouthStreetAnaheim, California92805.

Plaintiff is ignorant of the true names and capacities of the defendants sued

8 9

5.

10

DOES N20, Inclusive, and therefore sues these defendants by fictitious names. and capacitieswhen ascertained. herein as

11

12 Plaintiffwill amendthis complaintto allegetheirtrue

13 Plaintiffisinformedandbelievesandthereonallegesthatatall timesmentionedherein, eachof 14 thefictitiouslynameddefendantsisnegligently orotherwiseresponsibleinsomemanner, along 15 rviththenameddefendants, fortheoccurrenceshereinalleged,andPlamtiffsdamagesasherem or other wrongful acts and/or names

alleged were legally and proximately caused by that negligence

other acts and/oromissions ofboththenamed andfictitiously

16

omissions and thenegligenceor nameddefendants.

17 18

Plaintiffis informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that at all times herem weU as the fictitiously named defendants, defendants, and in doingthe 6.

19

mentioned, the defendants named in this action, as

and each ofthem, were agents and employees ofthe remaining

thingshereinaftercomplained ofwereactingwithinthecourse and scopeofsuchagency and/or ploymentandwiththeknowledgeandconsentoftheremainingdefendants,

about“May'-2: 201-8—a-water-loss-occurred-at—1-292-E-South--Street,

20 21 22 em 23

rr

On or 24

California, the home of Plaintiff’s insured, Kairbek Shakman, causing significant Anaheim,

property damage. Theinsured’sSamsungbrandFrenchdoorrefirigerator,modelRF4287HARS and serialnumber 102043CZ400453R(manufactured April,2010) leakedwatermtothekitchen

25 26 27 28

2

COMPLAINTFORDAMAGES

STF.3204

(6)

and sunounding areas when thefilter in the refrigerator burst. The filter is a CuUigan brand, model CW-S2. with a marking of‘T12n7H.” The filter is intended to replace the Samsung brand refrigerator filters. The insured purchasedthe refrigerator in February of2014 and had month before atrip abroad in March of2018. The insured Plaintiff’s

1

2 3

replacedthe water filter about

returned from the trip in late April and about two days later the failure occurred.

destructively examined the subject water filter, constructed of a plastic one 4 5 non­ expert engineer 6 water. The filtermediaintended to removetastes and odors from potable

filter contains a fracture that bifurcates at multiple locations. The fracture separated the top eceived attached toits head assembly. The casing and aninner

1

8

portion ofthefilter andthis separatedportion

consistentwithfreezing and no signofimpactthatwould havecontributedto wasr

9

10 failurepattern is

thefailurewasfound. This styleoffilteristypicallyinstalledinanareathatwouldbeprotected ,, from direct impactby aplastic cover. During failure, asthecrack drivingforce increasesand ,3 fire crackvelocity issufficientlyhigh, a singlecrackfrontbegins to spht up into many smaller

and diverge outward alongside each other but at

11

crack fi-onts. These continue to propagate

slightly differentcrackangles. Thelikelihood ofcrackbifurcationincreaseswiththemagnitude d dependonthetoughness ofthematerial. Therefore,thebifurcationof

14 15

oftheapplied forces

the fracture indicates a high stress with a rapidly propagating fracture or an 16 a low material 11 toughness. 18

intended to be installed in the refrigeration a similar fracture The subject filter model is

8.

19

Numerous refrigerator filters displaying compartment of the refiigerator.

sistent withfreezinghavebeenpreviouslyreceived bytheengineer. Inotherfilters dmilar failure mode, the filters failed due to freezing and thefreezing ofthe

20

pattern con received with a

21

22

Insome casesthethermostatthatcontrols filtershasbeencausedby arefrigeratormalfunction.

tffeopSingand-crosmgof'the-damperfails-to-function-properly-and-fiie.-filter--is-subjected,.to. Inothercases thedamperdooritselffailsandnolongerblockstheentryof

23

24

freezingconditions.

25

One website lists replacement of multiple cold air into the refiigerator compartment.

26

as the solutionto a “Refrigerator freezing food” malfunction for temperature controlling parts

21

28

COMPLAINTFORDAMAGES

STF.3204

(7)

an exemplarSamsungbrand refrigerator. Additionally,theinsured stated thatfood inthe back ofthesubjectrefrigeratorwasfreezingattimes.

Plaintiff,

1

2

STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, is informed 9.

3

and believes, and thereon alleges, thatthe water that leaked into Plaintiffs insured’s property originated &om the subject Samsung refrigerator. CuUigan water filter and/or their component manufactured, designed, distributed, inspected, supplied and/or sold by

4

5

parts, that were

Defendants, SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL, INC., CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL

6

7

COMPANY, andDOES 1-20,inclusive.

8

RTRST GAUSFOR ACTIONFORNEGLIGENCE

9

[AgainstAllDefendants]

10. Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 9 as though fully set

10 11 forthherein. 12 INC., CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL, SAMSUNG

INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, andDOES 1-20, inclusive, had a duty to use reasonablecare withrespecttothemanufacture, design, distribution, inspection, supply and/or sale ofthe subject

11. Defendants,

13 14 15

16 refrigerator,waterfilterand/ortheircomponentparts.

12. Defendants, SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL, INC., CULLIGAN

17

INTERNATIONALCOMPANY, andDOES L20,inclusive,negligentlymanufactured,designecL and/or sold the subject refrigerator, water filter and/or their

18

distributed, inspected, supplied

componentpartsand/orneghgentlyfailedto issueadequateinstruction or warnings regardingthe filter and/or their component parts, suchthat the subjectrefiigerator,

19

20

subject refrigerator, water

filter and/or their component parts left Defendants' possession

21

or control in a defective water

condition, withmanufacturing and/or design defects and/orinsufficient instruction or warning of ^ty anri/nr installation instructions"df'the'suBjecfTefrigerator.-water-filter and/or-theu-manufacturer, designer, distributer, inspector, supplier and/or seller is

22 23

24

component parts. A

negligent ifitfailstousetheamountofcareinmanufacturing,designing, distributing, inspecting, supplying and/or sellingthe productthata reasonably carefulmanufacturer, designer, distributer,

25

26

27 28

4

COMPLAINTFORDAMAGES

STF.3204

(8)

use insimilarcircumstances to avoid exposingothers to a inspector, supplierand/or seller-would

foreseeableriskofharm. In determiningwhether Defendantsusedreasonablecare, atrier offact or should haveknown about the lilcelihood and severit}' of

1

2

shall balancewhat Defendants knew

potentialharmfromtheproductagainsttheburdenoftakingsafet>'measurestoreduceoravoidthe

3

4

harm.

5

thepart ofDefendants and each of The afore-described acts and/or omissions

themcausedwatertoleak andescapeinsidetheinsured’spropertyfromthe subjectrefrigerator, water filterand/ortheircomponentparts, and to flood Plaintiff’s insured’s property on or about

May2, 2018,’andharmedPlaintiffsinsuredand Plaintiff

afore-describedactsand/oromissionsofDefendantsandeachofthemwerethe on 13. 6 1 8 9 14. The

legalandproximatecauseofdamagestoPlaintiffsinsuredandtoPlaintiff.

15. Theactsand/oromissionsofDefendantsandeachofthemwereasubstantialfactor

10 11 12

incausingharmtoPlaintiffsinsuredandtoPlaintiff.

result ofthe negligence ofDefendants andeach ofthem, Plaintiffsinsured

13

16. As a

sustainedatleast$87,921.90 indamages. Plaintiffpaidtooronbehalfofitsmsuredtheamountof $87,921.90,todate, andfurthermonetary damages areexpected andwiUbe accordingtoproofat includes Plaintiffs insured’s $1,456.00 deductible, which is recoverable by

14 15 16

trial. This sum

17

Plaintiff, STATE FARM GENERAL

Plaintiff under the respective policy of insurance.

18

INSURANCE COMPANTY, fulfilled its obligationspursuanttothe insurance agreementbetween Plaintiff, STATE FARM

19

Plaintiff and Plaintiffs insured, for the property damage losses.

20

seeksrecovery, by -way ofa subrogation claim, for

GENERALINSURANCE COMPANY, now

the indemnity and other damagesPlaintiffpaidto

and pending, plus other misceUaneous damages, costs, and pre-judgment

21

behalfofits insured inthe approximate or on

22

amount of$87,921.90,

interestffomthedateofloss,accordingtoproofattrial.

STr.rnNn

TATTSF.

of action

FOR

STRICT

PRODUCTS

LIABILIIY

23

24

25

[AgainstallDefendants]

Plaintiffincorporatesbyreferenceparagraphs 1 through16 asthoughfullysetforth

26

17.

27 28

5

COMPLAINTFORDAMAGES

STF.3204

(9)

herein. 1 INC., CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL, SAMSUNG 18. Defendants, 2

INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, and DOES 1-20, inclusive, manufactured, designed,

and/or sold the subject re&igerator, water filter and/or their manufacturing defects, insufficient instructions

3

distributed, inspected, supplied

component parts such that the product contained

and/or warnings ofpotential safety hazards and/or design defects when the products left said

4

5

6

Defendants’ possessionor control-19. The subject refrigerator,

7

filter and/or their component parts contained a water

8

9 manufacturing defect (aproduct contains amanufacturing defect ifthe product differs from the 10 manufacturer’sdesignorspecificationsorfromothertypicalunits ofthesameproductline)and/or 11 IIdesigndefect(ConsumerExpectationTest-thatthe subjectrefrigerator and/orwaterfilterdidnot

ordinary consumerwouldhave expectedthem to perform when used or 12 perform as safely

13 11misused in an intended or reasonably foreseeable way) or (Risk Benefit Test - once Plamtiff

. ThatDefendantsmanufactured/distributed/soldtheproduct;2. That as an

14 provesallofthefollowing: 1

15 Plaintiffwasharmed;and3.Thatthe[productj’sdesignwasasubstantialfactormcausmgharmto 16 11Plaintiffthen Plaintiffprevails unless Defendantsprove thatthebenefits oftheproduct’s design

outweigh therisks ofthedesignconsidering (a) The gravityofthepotentialharm resultingfrom occur; (c) The feasibility ofan

17

ofthe product; (b) The lilcelihoodthatthis harm would 18 the use

19 alternative safer designatthe time ofmanufacture; (d) The cost ofan alternative design; and (e) 20 ilhe disadvantages of an alternative design; and (f) Oflier relevant factors) when it left the

INC.. CULLIGAN

SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL,

of Defendants, 21 possession

22 INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, and DOES 1-20, inclusive, and failed to issue adequate 23 instmctionsorwarningsregardingthesubjectrefrigerator,waterfilterand/ortheircomponentparts 24 [(1. That Defendants^ufa’cti^id7distributed/soldtheTroductr2nharthe-product had

potential-25 risksthatwereknownorknowableinlightofthescientificItnowledgethatwasgeneraUy accepted 26 inthe scientificcommunit)' atthetimeofmanufacture/distribution/sale; 3. Thatthepotentialnsks is usedor misusedin an intended or reasonably' 27 presented asubstantial dangerwhentheproduct is

28

6

COMPLAINTFORDAMAGES

STF.3204

(10)

Thatordinaryconsumerswouldnothaverecognizedthepotentialrisks;5. That instruct of the potential risks; 6. That Plaintiff

was a substantial factor in foreseeablewa}';4-.

Defendants failed to adequately

harmed; and 7. That the lack of sufficient instructions or warnings

1

was

warn or

2 3

causingPlaintiff’sharm).

20 Plaintiffsinsuredbecametheuserofthedefectiveproduct. At the lime ofthe incident described herein, the product

intended by Defendants and/or in areasonably foreseeable manner and/or misused in a

4

5

being used in the was

21.

6

manner

7

reasonablyforeseeablemanner.

The afore-described acts and/or omissions on the part ofDefendants and each of inside Plaintiffs insured’s home firom the subject and/or their component parts, and to damage Plaintiffs insured s

e

22.

8

them caused water to leak and escape

10

refrigerator, water filter

propertyonoraboutMay2, 2018,andharmedPlaintiffsinsuredandPlaintiff.

23. Theafore-describeddefectiverefiigerator,waterfilterand/ortheircomponentparts

11 12 13

werethelegalandproximatecauseofdamagestoPlaintiff’sinsuredandtoPlamtiff. 24. Theactsand/or omissionsofDefendantsandeachofthemwere

14

asubstantialfactor

15

incausingharmtoPlaintiffsinsuredandtoPlaintiff.

resultofthemanufacture, design, distribution, inspection, supply and/or sale filter and/or their componentparts by Defendants, SAMSUNG

16

25. As a

17

ofthe subjectrefiigerator, water

INTERNATIONAL, INC., CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, and DOES 1-20,

inclusive, with manufacturing, inadequate warnings, and/or design defects, Plamtiffs insured in damages for repairs, restoration and/or

IB 19

20

sustained approximately $87,921.90, and pending, replacement of property,

fulfilledits obligations pursuantto the insuranceagreement betweenPlaintiffand its msured and ^^imb^ed Plaintiffs inged for alllosses. pramtiH,“STATE

FARM-GENERAL-INSURANGE-COMPANY, now seeks recovery, by way of a subrogation claim, for the mdemmty and other damagesPlaintiffpaidtooronbehalfofitsinsuredintheapproximateamountof$87,921.90 pending,plus othermiscellaneousdamages, costs,andpre-judgmentinterestffomthedateofloss,

21

Plaintiff, STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

22 23 24 25 ,and 26 27 28 7

COMPLAINTFORDAMAGES

STF.3204

(11)

accordingtoproofattrial.

THIRDrATTSEOFACTTONFORBREACHOFIMPLIEDWARRANTffiS

[AgainstallDefendants]

26. Plaintiffincorporatesbyreferenceparagraphs 1 through25asthoughfullysetforth

1 2 3 4 herein. 5 CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL, INC., SAMSUNG Defendants,

INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, and DOES 1-20, inclusive, manufactured, designed,

inspected, suppUed and/or sold the subject reftigerator, water filter and/or their component parts such that the product contained manufacturing defects, insufficient instmctions

ofpotential safety hazards and/or design defects when the product left 27. 6 7 distributed, 8 9 said and/or warnings 10

Defendants’ possessionorcontrol.

As a result. Defendants, SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL, INC., CULLIGAN

11

28.

12

INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, and DOES 1-20, inclusive, breachedthe implied warranty of installed at Plaintiffs insured’s

13

merchantability. The subject refrigerator and water filter

, and at the time. Defendants, SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL, INC., CULLIGAN were

14

property

INTERNATIONALCOMPAN^Y,andDOES 1-20,inclusive,wereinthebusinessofsellingthese goods and/orhelditselfoutashavingspecialknowledge orskiUregardingthesegoods;thesubject not of the same quality as those

15 16 17

refrigerator, water filter and/or their component parts were

generallyacceptableinthetrade;and/orwasnotfitfortheordinarypurposesforwhichsuchgoods

18 19

areused.

20

result. Defendants, SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL, INC., CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, andDOES 1-20, inclusive,breached theImphed Warrantyof FitnessforaParticularpurpose. Thesubjectrefiigerator,waterfilter and/ortheircomponentparts were installed at Plaintiff’s insured’s proper!}', and at the time. Defendants,

SAMSUNG-INTERNATIONAL, INC., CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, and DOES 1-20,

know that consumers intended to use the subject refrigerator,

29. As a 21 22 23 24 25

inclusive, knew or had reason to

waterfilter and/ortheircomponent partsforaparticularpurposeand wererely-ingonthe skill and

26

27 28

8

COMPLAINTFORDAMAGES

STF.3204

(12)

CULLIGAN INTERKATIONAL, INC.,

SAMSUNG Defendants,

judgment of

INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, and DOES 1-20, inclusive, tofurnish arefrigerator and water filter suitable forthe particular purpose; and Plaintiffs insuredjustifiablyrelied on Defendants, SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL, INC., CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, and DOES 1-20,

1

2 3

4

inclusive,skiUandjudgmentandthatthe subjectrefrigerator,waterfilterand/ortheir notsuitablefortheparticularpurposewhenoneorbothcomponentsfailed

5

componentpartswere

6

andcausedawaterlossand extensivepropertydamage.

30. The afore-described acts and/or omissions onthepart ofDefendants and each of inside Plaintiffs insured’s home from the subject

7 8

them caused water to leak and escape

refrigerator,waterfilterand/ortheircomponentpartsandtodamagePlaintiffs insured’sproperty

9 10

onoraboutMay2.2018, andharmedPlaintiffsinsuredandPlaintiff.

Theafore-described defectiverefiigerator,waterfilterand/or theircomponentparts

11

31.

12

werethelegalandproximatecauseofdamagestoPlaintiffsinsuredandtoPlaintiff.

32. Theactsand/oromissionsofDefendants andeachofthemwereasubstantial factor

13 14

incausinghanntoPlaintiffsinsuredandtoPlaintiff.

33. Asaresultofthebreachoftheimpliedwarrantiesofmerchantabilityandoffitness ofthe subject refrigerator, water filter and/or their component parts by

15 16

or a particular purpose

Defendants, SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL, INC., CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL COMPANY and DOES 1-20, inclusive. Plaintiffs insured sustained approximately $87,921.90, andpending,indamagesforrepairs,restorationand/orreplacementofproperty. Plaintiff, STATE

arm general INSURANCE COMPANY, fulfilledits obligationspursuanttotheinsurance

17 18 19

20

21

insured and reimbursed Plaintiffs insured for all losses. agreement between Plaintiff and its

Plaintiff, STATEFARMGENERALINSURANCE COMPANY,now Ti^r^ation claim, for the"ind^mnityi and~oth^damages Pimtiff pmd

insuredintheapproximateamountof$87,921.90,andpending,plusothermiscellaneousdamages,

22

seeks recovery,by wayof ■to“or"on“behalf-ofits

23

24

25

andpre-judgmentinterestfromthedateofloss,accordingtoproofattrial.

costs, 26 /// 27 28 9

COMPLAINTFORDAMAGES

STF.3204

(13)

PRAYER

for judgment against Defendants, SAMSUNG

1

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays

INTERNATIONAL, INC., CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, and DOES 1-20,

2 3

inclusive,andeachofthem,asfollows.

All damages Plaintiff paid to or $87,921.90,continuingandaccordingtoproof;

ForcostsofsuitincurredbyPlaintiffherein;

4

behalf of its insured in the amount of on 1. 5 6 2. 7

Forpre-judgmentinterestaccordingtoproofattrial; 3.

8

ly andall suchrehefasthecourtmaydeemjustandproper. Submitted, For

4.

9

Resped

WATKINS&teXCffSW, .,2019 DATED: April / 10 11 / 12 By: ^ANSA^AS /AttomeyforPlaintiff,

STATEFARMGENERAL

INSURANCECOMPANY

13 14 15 16

STF.3204.STFv.SamsungInternational,Inc.;CulliganinternationalCompanyComplainLdoc

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 10

COMPLAINTFORDAMAGES STF.3204

(14)

2900SHarborBlvd.,Suite240

®“TCL™™‘lto^^94t476-9400 949-476-9407

... Mff.stateFarmGeneralInsuranceCompgaZ

SUPERIORCOURTOFCALIFORNIA,COUNTYOF ORANGE

700CivicCenterDnve West SantaAna 92701

CentralJusticeCenter_____

SupBriorCourtof California, CountyofOrange 04/04/2019 at03:36:40 PM

Clerk ofthe Superior Conn Brook IsraeLDeputyClerk

STREETADDRESS: MAILINGADDRESS: CITYAND21PCODE: BRANCHNAME:

vs.SAMSUNGINTERNATIONAL.INC..ETAL.

CASENUMBER:

30-2019-010G1907-CU-NP-aC JudgeThomas A Delaney ComplexCaseDesignation

1 Counter □ Joinder

CIVILCASECOVERSHEET

[ I Limited (Amount demandedis

$25,000orless)_______________________

1-6belowmustbecompleted(seeinstructionsonpage2).

Checkoneboxbelowforthecasetypethatbestdescribesthiscase: Contract I BreachofconkaclAwarranty(06) I Rule3.740collections(09) I Othercollections(09) Insurancecoverage(18) I Otherwntract(37) ealProperty I Eminentdomain/inverse condemnation(14) ~n Wrongfuleviction(33)

~n Ottterrealproperty(26) I / I Unlimited

(Amount demanded exceeds$25,000)

JUDGE:

Filedwithfirstappearancebydefendant

(Cal.RulesofCourt,rule3.402) DEPT:

1 ProvisionallyComplexCivilLitigation

(Cal.RulesofCourt,rules3.400-3.403) I I Antitrust/Traderegulation(03) LJ Constructiondefect(10) I 1 Masstort(40)

LJ Securitieslitigation(28) I I EnvlronmBntal/Toxictort(30)

I I Insurancecoverageclaimsarisingfromthe abovelistedprovisionallycomplexcase types(41)

EnforcementofJudgment I ~l Enforcementofjudgment(20) MiscellaneousCivilComplaint □ RICO(27)

I I othercomplaint(notspedfiedabove)(42)

AutoTort -1__ I Auto(22)

I 1 Uninsuredmotorist(46)

OtherPl/PD/WD(PersonalInjury/Property DamageWrongfulDeath)Tort

I Asbestos(04) 1 Productliability(24)

I Medicalmalpractice(45)

I OtherPl/PD/WD(23) Non-Pl/PD/WD(Other)Tort

LJ Businesstort/unfairbusinesspractice(07) i I Civilrights(OS)

LJ Defamation(13) □ Fraud(16)

LJ Intellectualproperty(19)

LJ Professionalnegligence(25) m Othernon-PI/PD/WDtort(35)

Employment

i I WrongfulterminaUon(36) I I Otheremployment(15)

2 ThiRrase I [

factorsrequiringexceptionalJudicialmanagement: a.[ID Largenumberofseparatelyrepresentedparties b.□ Extensivemotionpracticeraisingdifficultornovel

issuesthatwillbetime-consumingtoresolve c.im Substantialamountofdocumentaryevidence

inlawfulDetainer I Commercial(31) I Residential(32)

IZI Drugs(38)

MiscellaneousCivilPetition

I n Partnershipandcorporategovernance(21) JudicialReview

Assetforfeiture(05)

1 Petitionre:arbitrationaward(11) \ \ otherpetition(notspec///edabove)(43) I I Writofmandate(02)

" 1 Otherjudicialreviev/(39)_____________ __________ — . . ---I / I isnot complexunderrule3.400oftheCaliforniaRulesofCourt.Ifthecaseiscomplex,markthe

d.CZlLargenumberofwitnesses

e.I 1Coordinationwithrelatedactionspendinginoneormorecourts inothercounties,states,orcountries,orinafederalcourt f I ISubstantialpostjudgmentjudicialsupervision

3. Remediessough.(ot,eoKa//tha.apply):a,[Zl monetary bQ nonmonete^;^.^ nTXoVCliedSaties

4. Numbbrofcausesofaction(specify): Thi'ee-Negligence, StnctPro/itictsLiabJity,BreachofImpliedWananh

I IIs I V Iisnot aclassactionsuit. X j

lyknownrelatedcases,fileandserveanoticeofrelated^se.(Youmayi4se 5. Thiscase 6. Ifthereare Date: April,^_ JuanSaias,gsq. 151 ifTTJCl ^2019

V

-ORATTORNEYFORPARTY) /SIGNATUREOFPAR'

fTYPEORPRINTNMviE)

: youmustse^eacopyofthiscovershea,ona„

. ESSlecfons°ia’’se?nder?uie3.740oraoompiexcase,thiscoversheetwillbeusedforstatisticalpurposesoni^^^^

Cel.RulesofCourt,ailas2.30.X22D,3.400-3.403,3.740; CaLStandardsofJutCcia!Administration,std.3.10 www.courf/nfb.ce.pw

CIVILCASECOVERSHEET

FormAdoptedforMandatoryUse JudicialCouncilofCalifornia

(15)

T ■ t-ffc nthprc; Filina First Papers. If you arefiling a first paper (for example, a complaint) in a civil case you must ,To Plaintiffs and Others Fi 9 ^ . . _ CoverSheetcontainedonpage 1. Thisinformationwillbeusedtocompile

completeandfile along You mustcomplete items 1 through 6onthesheet. In item 1.youmustcheck

statisticsabout ^ beTfdescribesthecase. Ifthecasefitsbothageneralandamore specifictypeofcaselistedinitem1,

:Heor.^rorefpLlfone ,f.He.sehas™^

Wit^-«-P- ^ subje.apany,

orbothtosanctionsunderrules2.30and3.220oftheCaliforniaRulesofCourt.

T P.rfipc in Rule 3740 CollectionsCases. A"collections case" under rule3.740isdefined asan action forrecovery ofmoney

To Parties in $25,000.exclusiveofinterestandattorney'sfees, arisingfromatransactionin

owed inasumstatedto acauiredoncredit. Acollectionscasedoesnotincludeanactionseekingthefollowing: (1)tort whichproperty,sen/ices. y real property (4) recovery of personal property, or (5) a prejudgment writ of damages, of’a caseas a^rule 3.740^cofiections case onthisform meansthat itwill be exempt fromthegeneral

“en,ii'"emrand rules, unlessa defendantfilesaresponsive pleadinp. A rule 3.740colleofions

casttilbesubiedtotherequirementsforserviceandobtainingajudgmentinrule3.740. „ ,k ,1,

casewilloesu j m , ^ies must also usethe CivilCase CoverSheetto designatewhetherthe To Parties in thecaseiscomptex underrule3.400oftheCalifornia Rules ofCourt,thismustbeindicated by case IScomplex. Ifa plaintiffRelievestherase isco^x un designatesa caseascomplex,thecoversheetmustbeservedwiththe completing'heappropnae ^^^^da^Zy 'leand serve no laterthanthe time ofitsfirst appearance ajoinderin the plaTnfiffsdSigrafcn,acounter-designationthatthecaseisnotcomplex,or.ittheplaintiffhasmadenodesignation,adesignationthat itscounsel,

CASETYPESANDEXAMPLES thecaseiscomplex.

ProvisionallyComplexCivilLitigation(Cal. RulesofCourtRules3.400-3.403)

Antitrust/TradeRegulation(03) ConstructionDefect(10) ClaimsInvolvingMassTort(40) SecuritiesLitigation(28) Environmental/ToxicTort(30) InsuranceCoverageClaims

(arisingfromprovisionaliycomplex

casetypelistedabove)(41) EnforcementofJudgment

EnforcementofJudgment(20) AbstractofJudgment(Outof

County)

ConfessionofJudgment fnon-domesficrelations)

SisterStateJudgment AdministrativeAgencyAward

I'nofunpaidfaxes)

Petition/CertificationofEntryof JudgmentonUnpaidTaxes . OtherEnforcementofJudgment

Case

MiscellaneousCivilComplaint RICO(27)

OtherComplaintfnofspecified

above)(42)

DeclaratoryReliefOnly InjunctiveReliefOnly

(non-harassment)

MechanicsLien

OtherCommercialComplaint Case(non-tort/non-complex)

OtherCivilComplaint

(non-tort/non-cx)mplex)

MiscellaneousCivilPetition PartnershipandCorporate

Governance(21) OtherPetition(nofspecified

above)(43) CivilHarassment WorkplaceViolence Elder/DependentAdult Abuse ElectionContest PetitionforNameChange PetitionforReliefFromLate

Claim OtherCivilPetition Contract

BreachofContract/Warranty(06) BreachofRental/Lease

Contract(nofunlawfuldetainer orv/rongfuleviction)

ContractA/VarrantyBreach-Seller Plaintiff(notfraudornegligence)

NegligentBreachofContract/ Warranty

OtherBreachofContract/Warranty Collections(e.g.,moneyowed,open

bookaccounts)(09)

CollectionCase-SellerPlaintiff OtherPromissoryNote/CoHections InsuranceCoverage(notprovisionally

mmplex)(18) AutoSubrogation OtherCoverage AutoTort

Auto(22)-PersonaiInjury/Property Damage/WrongfulDeath UninsuredMotorist(46){ifthe

caseinvolvesanuninsured motoristclaimsubjectto arbitration,chec/fthisitem insteadofAuto)

OtherPI/PD/WD(PersonalInjury/ PropertyDamage/WrongfulDeath) Tort

Asbestos(04)

AsbestosPropertyDamage AsbestosPersonalInjury/

WrongfulDeath ProductLiabilityfnofasbestosor

toxic/environmental)(24) MedicalMalpractice(45)

Medical Malpractice-Physicians&Surgeons OtherProfessionalHealthCare

Malpractice OtherPI/PD/WD(23)

PremisesLiability(e.g.,slip andfall)

IntentionalBodilyInjury/PD/WD (e.g.,assault,vandalism) intentionalInflictionof

EmotionalDistress NegligentInflictionof

EmotionalDistress OtherPI/PD/WD Non-PI/PD/WD(Other)Tort

BusinessTort/UnfairBusiness Practice(07)

CivilRights(e.g.,discrimination, falsearrest)fnofcivil

harassment)(08)

Defamation(e.g.,slander,libel)

OtherContract(37) ContractualFraud OtherContractDispute RealProperty

EminentDomain/Inverse Condemnation(14) WrongfulEviction(33)

OtherRealProperty(e.g..quiettitle)(26) WritofPossessionofRealProperty MortgageForeclosure

QuietTitle

OtherRealProperty(noteminent

domain,landlord/tenant,or foreclosure)

UnlawfulDetainer Commercial(31) Residential(32)

Drugs(38)(ifthecaseinvolvesillegal drugs,checkthisitem;otherwise, reportasCommercialorResidential)

JudicialReview AssetForfeiture(05)

PetitionRe;ArbitrationAward(11) WritofMandate(02)

Writ-AdministrativeMandamus Writ-MandamusonLimitedCourt (13)

Fraud(16)

IntellectualProperty(19) ProfessionalNegligence(25)

LegalMalpractice

OtherProfessionalMalpractice (nofmedicalorlegal)

OtherNon-PI/PD/WDTort(35) Employment

WrongfulTermination(36) OtherEmployment(15)

CaseMatter

Writ-OtherLimitedCourtCase Review

OtherJudicialReview(39) ReviewofHealthOfficerOrder NoticeofAppeal-Labor

CommissionerAppeals

Page2of2

CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET

References

Related documents

1 (colour online) Relative macronutrient intake (percentage contribution to total energy intake) of (a) protein, (b) fat and (c) carbohydrate of pre-school aged (1 –5 years)

Cunningham is currently involved in the development and evaluation of large group community-based parenting programs and.. school-based student mediated conflict

When the key policy tools are controlled for, centralisation of the benefit and support assessment service and timely vocational rehabilitation were found to be strongly

Cross sectional study Mozambique: Effect of household characteristics on the mean number of fingers contaminated and mean log colony count of Enterococcus and

Page’s award nomination highlights her unwavering dedication to campus governance and her outstanding service to the institution and her colleagues; the thoughtful, sensitive, and

The VET teachers named the following as the main factors threatening their enthusiasm at work: lack of resources and cuts in education spending, negative atmosphere and problems

The low compliance to hand hygiene among nurses and high number of patients who contracted hospital acquired infection happened in spite of the availability of the

This function allows the user to get the length of the Feature report (Control data packet sent from the PC to the device). This value is specified in