• No results found

3D Matrix Ring with a “Common” Multiplication

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "3D Matrix Ring with a “Common” Multiplication"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

2017, Volume 4, e3593 ISSN Online: 2333-9721 ISSN Print: 2333-9705

3D Matrix Ring with a “Common” Multiplication

Orgest Zaka

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Technical Science, University of Vlora “Ismail QEMALI”, Vlora, Albania

Abstract

In this article, starting from geometrical considerations, he was born with the idea of 3D matrices, which have developed in this article. A problem here was the definition of multiplication, which we have given in analogy with the usual 2D matrices. The goal here is 3D matrices to be a generalization of 2D ma-trices. Work initially we started with 3 3 3× × matrix, and then we extended

to m n× ×p matrices. In this article, we give the meaning of 3D matrices. We also defined two actions in this set. As a result, in this article, we have reached to present 3-dimensional unitary ring matrices with elements from a field F.

Subject Areas

Algebra, Applied Statistical Mathematics, Geometry

Keywords

Linear Algebra, Matrices, Ring Theory

1. Introduction

Based on the meaning of the addition and the multiplication of 2D matrices [1]-[6], this article stretches this sense, the idea, the addition and the multiplica-tion of 3D matrices. Starting from geometrical consideramultiplica-tions, concretely taking into account the cube, he was born with the idea of 3D matrices, which have de-veloped in this article. A problem here was the definition of multiplication, for which we have acted pages, analogously acted as the columns, which we have given in analogy with the usual 2D matrices [6][9]. The goal here is 3D matrices to be a generalization of 2D matrices. We proved that this set of two actions to-gether in forming the “unitary ring” [7][8][10][11]. In literature and in various mathematical forums, we noticed an interest in the 3D matrices, but on the other hand are missing results associated with them; this was a sufficient reason to explore. We introduced the meaning of the scalar multiplication, and finally How to cite this paper: Zaka, O. (2017) 3D

Matrix Ring with a “Common” Multipli- cation. Open Access Library Journal, 4: e3593.

https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1103593

Received: April 11, 2017 Accepted: May 12, 2017 Published: May 15, 2017

Copyright © 2017 by author and Open Access Library Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

(2)

we have shown that we have an F-module connected to this ring 3D matrices or vector spaces [8][10]. As indications for this paper were simply geometric im-aginations. Everything presented in this article are my results.

2. Addition of 3 × 3 × 3, 3-D Matrices over Field

F

, and the

Addition Abelian Group of Their 3-D Matrices

Imagining a parallelepiped, with born idea of 3D matrices, which are define as follows

Definition 2.1 3-dimensional 3 × 3 × 3 matrice will call, a matrix which has:

three horizontal layers (analogous to three rows), three vertical page (analogue

with three columns in the usual matrices) and three vertical layers two of which are hidden.

The set of these matrices the write how:

( )

{

( )

}

3 3 3× × F = aijk |aijkF and i=1, 2, 3;j=1, 2, 3;k=1, 2, 3

The appearance of these matrices will be as in Figure 1.

Definition 2.2 The addition of two matrices A3 3 3× × ,B3 3 3× × ∈3 3 3× ×

( )

F we will call the matrix:

( )

{

}

{

}

3 3 3× × = cijk |cijk =aijk+bijk,∀i j k, , ∈ 1, 2, 3

C

The appearance of the addition of 3 × 3 × 3, 3D matrices, will be as in Figure 2, where matrices A and B have the following appearance,

( )

{

}

( )

{

}

3 3 3

3 3 3

| for 1, 2, 3; 1, 2, 3; 1, 2, 3

| for 1, 2, 3; 1, 2, 3; 1, 2, 3

ijk ijk ijk ijk

a a F i j k

b b F i j k

× × × ×

= ∈ = = =

= ∈ = = =

A

B

111

231 221

211

131 121

331 321

311

112

232 222

212

132 122

332 322

312

113

233 223

213

133 123

333 323

313 121

221 231

[image:2.595.229.518.469.719.2]

131

(3)

111

231 221

211

131 121

331 321

311 112

232 222

212

132 122

332 322

312

113

233 223

213

133 123

333 323

313 121

221 231

131 111

231 221

211

131 121

331 321

311 112

232 222

212

132 122

332 322

312

113

233 223

213

133 123

333 323

313 121

221 231 131

( )

1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3

i ijk i k

A

a

= = =

=

( )

1,2,3

1,2,3 1,2,3

i ijk i k

B

b

= = =

=

[image:3.595.58.536.73.293.2]

+

Figure 2. The addition of 3 × 3 × 3, 3D matrices.

Definition 2.3 Zero matrix 3 × 3, 3D we will called the matrix that has all its elements zero.

( )

{

}

3 3 3× × = 0F ijk|i=1, 2, 3;j=1, 2, 3;k=1, 2, 3

O

Definition 2.4. The opposite matric of anmatrice

( )

{

}

3 3 3× × = aijk |i=1, 2, 3;j=1, 2, 3;k=1, 2, 3

A

will, called matrix

( )

{

}

3 3 3× × aijk |i 1, 2, 3;j 1, 2, 3;k 1, 2, 3

A = − = = =

(where −aijk is a opposite element of element aijkF, so aijk+ −

( )

aijk =0F

and

(

F, ,+ ⋅

)

is field [8][10][11]), which satisfies the condition

(

)

{

(

(

)

)

}

( )

{

}

3 3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3

| 1, 2, 3; 1, 2, 3; 1, 2, 3

0 | 1, 2, 3; 1, 2, 3; 1, 2, 3

ijk ijk

ijk

a a i j k

i j k

× × × ×

× ×

+ − = + − = = =

= = = = =

A A

O

Theorem 2.1

(

3 3 3× ×

( )

F ,+

)

is a beliangrup.

Proof: Truly from the definition 2.2, of addition the 3-Dmatrices, we see that

addition is the sustainable in 3 3 3× ×

( )

F , because

{

}

, , , , 1, 2, 3

ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk

aF b ∈ ⇒F c =a +bFi j k

1) Associative property,

( )

aijk ,

( )

bijk ,

( )

cijk 3 3 3× ×

( ) (

F

)

(

)

∀ =A B= C= ∈

A+B + = +C A B+C truly

(

)

( ) ( ) ( ) (

) ( ) (

(

)

)

(

)

(

(

)

)

( ) (

)

(

)

ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk

a b c a b c a b c

a b c a b c a b c

 

+ + = + + = + + = + +

= + + = + + = + + = + +

A B C

(4)

2) ∀ =A

( )

aijk

3 3 3× ×

( )

F ,∃ =O

( )

0ijk /A O+ = + =O A A.

truly, ∀ =A

( )

aijk

3 3 3× ×

( )

F ,∃ =O

( )

0ijk /A O+ = + =O A A.

( )

( )

{

}

(

)

{

}

( )

{

}

0 | 1, 2, 3; 1, 2, 3; 1, 2, 3

0 | 1, 2, 3; 1, 2, 3; 1, 2, 3

| 1, 2, 3; 1, 2, 3; 1, 2, 3

ijk ijk

ijk ijk

ijk

a i j k

a i j k

a i j k

+ = + = = =

= + = = =

= = = = =

A O

A

3) ∀ =A

( )

aijk

3 3 3× ×

( )

F ,∃ − = −A

( )

aijk

3 3 3× ×

( )

F /A+ −

( )

A =O. truly, from Definition 2.4, we have

( )

{

(

(

)

)

}

( )

{

}

| 1, 2, 3; 1, 2, 3; 1, 2, 3

0 | 1, 2, 3; 1, 2, 3; 1, 2, 3

ijk ijk

ijk

a a i j k

i j k

+ − = + − = = =

= = = = =

A A

O

4) Addition is commutative.

( )

aijk ,

( )

bijk 3 3 3× ×

( )

F , . ∀ =A B= ∈

A+ = +B B A

truly

( ) ( ) (

)

( , ) is abelian

(

) ( ) ( )

ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk

a b a b b a b a

+

+ = + = + = + = + = +

A B B A

3. Addition of

m n

× ×

p

, 3-D Matrices over Any Field

F

and

the Addition Abelian Group of Their 3-D Matrices

Definition 3.1 3-dimensionalmxnxp matrix will call, a matrix which has: m-

horizontal layers (analogous to m-rows), n-vertical page (analogue with n-col-

umns in the usualmatrices) and p-vertical layers (p − 1 of which are hidden). The set of these matrixes the write how:

( )

{

( )

| -field and 1, ; 1, ; 1,

}

m n p× × F = aijk aijkF i= m j= n k= p

Definition 3.2 The addition of two matrices A B, ∈m n p× ×

( )

F we will call the matrix:

( )

{

| , 1, ; 1, ; 1,

}

m n p× × = cijk cijk =aijk+bijk ∀ =i m j= n k= p

C

The appearance of the addition of mxnxp, 3D matrices will be as in Figure 3, where matrices A and B have the following appearance,

( )

{

}

( )

{

}

| 1, ; 1, ; 1,

| 1, ; 1, ; 1,

m n p ijk m n p ijk

a i m j n k p

b i m j n k p

× × × ×

= = = =

= = = =

A

B

Definition 3.3 3-D, Zero matrix m n× ×p, we will called the matrix that has all its elements zero.

( )

{

0 | 1, ; 1, ; 1,

}

m n p× × ijk i m j n k p

= = = = =

O O

Definition 3.4 The opposite matric of anmatrice

( )

{

| 1, ; 1, ; 1,

}

( )

m n p× × = aijk i= m j= n k= pm n p× × F

A

(5)

111

231 221

211

131 121

mn1 m21

m11 112

2n2 222

212

1n2 122

mn2 m22

m12

11p

2np 22p

213

1np 12p

mnp m2p

m1p 121

221 2n1 1n1

( )

1, 1, 1,

i m ijk i n k p

A

a

= = =

=

+

111

231 221

211

131 121

mn1 m21

m11 112

2n2 222

212

1n2 122

mn2 m22

m12

11p

2np 22p

213

1np 12p

mnp m2p

m1p 121

221 2n1 1n1

( )

1, 1, 1,

i m ijk i n k p

B

b

= = =

[image:5.595.62.533.71.298.2]

=

Figure 3. The addition of mxnxp, 3D matrices.

( )

{

| 1, ; 1, ; 1,

}

( )

m n p× × aijk i m j n k p m n p× × F

A = − = = = ∈

(where −aijk is a opposite element of element aijkF, so aijk+ −

( )

aijk =0F

and

(

F, ,+ ⋅

)

is field), which satisfies the condition

(

)

{

(

(

)

)

}

( )

{

}

| 1, ; 1, ; 1,

0 | 1, ; 1, ; 1,

m n p m n p ijk ijk

ijk

a a i m j n k p

i m j n k p

× × + − × × = + − = = =

= = = = =

A A

O

Theorem 3.1

(

m n p× ×

( )

F ,+

)

is abeliangrup.

Proof: Truly from the definition 3.2, of additions the 3-D matrices, we see that

addition is the sustainable inm n p× ×

( )

F , because

, , 1, ; 1, ; 1,

ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk

aF b ∈ ⇒F c =a +bF ∀ =i m j= n k= p

1) Associative property,

( )

aijk ,

( )

bijk ,

( )

cijk m n p× ×

( ) (

F

)

(

)

∀ =A B= C= ∈

A+B + = +C A B+C truly

(

)

( ) ( ) ( ) (

) ( ) (

(

)

)

(

)

(

(

)

)

( ) (

)

(

)

ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk

a b c a b c a b c

a b c a b c a b c

 

+ + = + + = + + = + +

= + + = + + = + + = + +

A B C

A B C

2) ∀ =A

( )

aijk

m n p× ×

( )

F ,∃ =O

( )

0ijk

m n p× ×

( )

F /A O+ = + =O A A.

truly,

( )

aijk m n p× ×

( )

F ,

( )

0ijk m n p× ×

( )

F / .

∀ =A

∃ =O

A O+ = + =O A A

( )

( )

{

}

(

)

{

}

( )

{

}

0 | 1, ; 1, ; 1,

0 | 1, ; 1, ; 1,

| 1, ; 1, ; 1,

ijk ijk

ijk F ijk

ijk

a i m j n k p

a i m j n k p

a i m j n k p

+ = + = = =

= + = = =

= = = = =

A O

(6)

3) ∀ =A

( )

aijk

m n p× ×

( )

F ,∃ − = −A

( )

aijk

m n p× ×

( )

F /A+ −

( )

A =O.

truly, from Definition 2.4, we have

( )

{

(

(

)

)

}

( )

{

}

| 1, ; 1, ; 1,

0 | 1, ; 1, ; 1,

ijk ijk

F ijk

a a i m j n k p

i m j n k p

+ − = + − = = =

= = = = =

A A

O

4) Addition is commutative.

( )

aijk ,

( )

bijk m n p× ×

( )

F / .

∀ =A B= ∈

A+ = +B B A

truly

( ) ( ) (

)

(F, ) is abelian

(

) ( ) ( )

ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk ijk

a b a b b a b a

+

+ = + = + = + = + = +

A B B A

4. The “Common” Multiplication of

3 3 3

× ×

, 3-D Matrices

with Elements Froman Field

F

Definition 4.1: The multiplication of two matrices A B, ∈3 3 3× ×

( )

F we will

call the matrix C= ⊗ ∈A B 3 3 3× ×

( )

F calculated as follows:

113 123 133

213 223 233

313 323 333

112 122 132

212 222 232

312 322 332

111 121 131

211 221 231

311 321 331

3-vertical layer

3-2-vertical layer

1-vertical layer

,

a a a

a a a

a a a

a a a

a a a

a a a

a a a

a a a

a a a

                    ∀                    

113 123 133

213 223 233

313 323 333

112 122 132

212 222 232 3 3

312 322 332

111 121 131

211 221 231

311 321 331

vertical layer

2-vertical layer

1-vertical layer

b b b

b b b

b b b

b b b

b b b

b b b

b b b

b b b

b b b

× ×                     ∈                    

3

( )

F

[image:6.595.203.537.317.511.2]

The appearance of the multiplication of 3 × 3 × 3, 3D matrices will be as in

Figure 4.

(

)

(

)

(

)

113 123 133 113

213 223 233

313 323 333

112 122 132

212 222 232

312 322 332

111 121 131

211 221 231

311 321 331

3-vertical layer

2-vertical layer

1-vertical layer

c c c a a

c c c

c c c

c c c

c c c

c c c

c c c

c c c

c c c

                =  =                   C

123 133 113 123 133

213 223 233 213 223 233

313 323 333 313 323 333

112 122 132 112 122 132

212 222 232 212 222 232

312 322 332

111 121 131

211 221 231

311 321 331

a b b b

a a a b b b

a a a b b b

a a a b b b

a a a b b b

a a a

a a a

a a a

a a a

                ⊗                    

312 322 332

111 121 131

211 221 231

311 321 331

b b b

b b b

b b b

b b b

                                   

(7)

111

231 221

211

131 121

331 321

311 112

232 222

212

132 122

332 322

312

113

233 223

213

133 123

333 323

313 121

221 231

131 111

231 221

211

131 121

331 321

311 112

232 222

212

132 122

332 322

312

113

233 223

213

133 123

333 323

313 121

221 231 131

( )

1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3

i ijk i k

A

a

= = =

=

( )

1,2,3

1,2,3 1,2,3

i ijk i k

B

b

= = =

=

111

211

311 112

212

312

113

213

[image:7.595.60.532.76.494.2]

313

Figure 4. The multiplication of 3 × 3 × 3, 3D matrices.

111 111 111 121 211 131 311

112 112 112 122 211 132 312

113 113 113 123 213 133 313

;

;

;

c a b a b a b

c a b a b a b

c a b a b a b

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

211 211 111 221 211 231 311

212 212 112 222 211 232 312

213 213 113 223 213 233 313

;

;

;

c a b a b a b

c a b a b a b

c a b a b a b

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

311 311 111 321 211 331 311

312 312 112 322 211 332 312

313 313 113 323 213 333 313

;

;

;

c a b a b a b

c a b a b a b

c a b a b a b

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

the second vertical page is:

121 111 121 121 221 131 321

122 112 122 122 222 132 322

123 113 123 123 223 133 323

;

;

;

c a b a b a b

c a b a b a b

c a b a b a b

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

(8)

221 211 121 221 221 231 321

222 212 122 222 222 232 322

223 213 123 223 223 233 323

;

;

;

c a b a b a b

c a b a b a b

c a b a b a b

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

321 311 121 321 221 331 321

322 312 122 322 222 332 322

323 313 123 323 223 333 323

;

;

;

c a b a b a b

c a b a b a b

c a b a b a b

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

and third vertical page is:

131 111 131 121 231 131 331

132 112 132 122 232 132 332

133 113 133 123 233 133 333

;

;

;

c a b a b a b

c a b a b a b

c a b a b a b

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

231 211 121 221 221 231 321

232 212 122 222 222 232 322

233 213 123 223 223 233 323

;

;

;

c a b a b a b

c a b a b a b

c a b a b a b

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

331 311 121 321 221 331 321

332 312 122 322 222 332 322

333 313 123 323 223 333 323

;

;

;

c a b a b a b

c a b a b a b

c a b a b a b

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

= ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

It is reduce the above notes through matrix blocks

3 3 3 3 3

2 2 2 2 2

1 1 1 1 1

×

       

  =    = ×

       

       ×

       

C A B A B

C A B A B

C A B A B

where

111 121 131 112 122 132 113 123 133

1 211 221 231 2 212 222 232 3 213 223 233

311 321 331 312 322 332 313 323 333

111 121 131

1 211 221 231

311 321 331

; ; ;

;

a a a a a a a a a

a a a a a a a a a

a a a a a a a a a

b b b

b b b

b b b

     

     

= = =

     

     

 

 

=  

 

 

A A A

B

112 122 132 113 123 133

2 212 222 232 3 213 223 233

312 322 332 313 323 333

; ;

b b b b b b

b b b b b b

b b b b b b

   

   

= =

   

   

B B

3 3 3 3 3

2 2 2 2 2

1 1 1 1 1

×

       

  =    = ×

       

       ×

       

C A B A B

C A B A B

C A B A B

and

111 121 131 112 122 132 113 123 133

1 211 221 231 2 212 222 232 3 213 223 233

311 321 331 312 322 332 313 323 333

; ;

c c c c c c c c c

c c c c c c c c c

c c c c c c c c c

     

     

= = =

     

     

C C C

1= 1× 1; 2 = 2× 2; 3 = 3× 3

C A B C A B C A B

Remark 4.1 Two dimensional matrices can think like matrix with size

1

m n× ×

Easy seen from the definition 1, above it that, if aij2=0,aij3=0 and 2 0, 3 0,

ij ij

b = b = ∀i j, ∈

(

1, 2, 3

)

we get, the usual 3 × 3-matrix multiplication,

(9)

would say that: A2=0; A3=0; B2=0; B3=0):

111 111 121 211 131 311 111 121 121 221 131 321 111 131 121 231 131 331

211 111 221 211 231 311 211 121 221 221 231 321 211 121 221 221 231 321

311 111 321 211 331

a b a b a b a b a b a b a b a b a b

a b a b a b a b a b a b a b a b a b

a b a b a b

⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅

⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅ 311 a311 b121 a321 b221 a331 b321 a311 b121 a321 b221 a331 b321

 

 

 

+ + + +

 

Definition 4.2. The3-D,unit matrix, associated with the “common” multipli-cation, must be:

3 3 3

1 0 0

0 1 0 t vertical layer

vertical layer

t hi

he first vertic rd

0 0 1

1 0 0

0 1 0 the second

0 0 1

1 0 0

0 1 0

0 0

al layer

1

× ×

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

=  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I

or, in the language of matrix blocks:

3 3

3 3 3 3 3

3 3

×

× × ×

×

 

 

=  

 

 

I

I I

I

Easy distinguish that, ∀ ∈A 3 3 3× ×

( )

F /AI3 3 3× × =A.

Theorem 4.1

(

3 3 3× ×

( )

F ,⊗

)

is a unitary semi-Group with regard to this ordinary multiplication

Proof: 1) associative property. ∀A B C, , ∈3 3 3× ×

( )

F

(

)

(

)

(

)

( )

( )

(

)

(

)

(

)

3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

3 3 3 3

, is a semigroup

2 2 2 2

1 1 1

F

A B C

A B C

A B C

× ×

 

       ×    × ×

 

     = ×  = × ×

 

         

           

    ×   × ×

   

 × × 

 

= × × =

× ×

 

A B C A B C

A B C A B C

A B C A B C

A B C A

A B C A

A B C

3 3

2 2

1 1 1

.

 

     

 

    

 

     

           

B C

B C

A B C

2) ∃I3 3 3× × ∈3 3 3× ×

( )

F /∀ ∈A 3 3 3× ×

( )

F ⇒ ×A I3 3 3× × = A.

( )

( 3 3 )

3 3 3 3 3 3 , is a unitary semigroup 3

2 3 3 2 3 3 2

1 3 3 1 3 3 1 F

×

× × ×

× ×

× ×

×

   

   

   

  = × =  

   

   

     ×   

       

A I A I A

A I A I A

A I A I A

Theorem 4.2

(

3 3 3× ×

( )

F , ,+ ⊗

)

is a unitary Ring.

Proof: 1) From Theorem 2.1.

(

3 3 3× ×

( )

F ,+

)

is abeliangrup.

2) From Theorem 4.1.

(

3 3 3× ×

( )

F ,⊗

)

is a unitary semi-Group, and conse-quently also,

(

3 3 3× ×

( )

F ,⊗

)

is a unitary semi-Group

3) ∀A B C, , ∈3 3 3× ×

( )

F ,

(

)

(

)

(10)

truly

(

)

(

(

)

)

(

)

( )

( 3 3 )

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

3 3 3 3

, , is a unitary Ring

2 2 2 2

1 1

F

× + ×

 

  + × +

         

 

 

         

⊗ + =  + =  ⊗ + = × +          +   × + 

           

× + ×

= × + ×

× +

A B C A B C A B C

A B C A B C A B C A B C

A B C A B C A B C

A B A C

A B A C

A B A

3 3 3 3

2 2 2 2

1 1 1 1 1 1

3 3 3 3

2 2 2 2

1 1 1 1

.

× ×

     

  = ×  + ×

     

×   ×   ×

     

               

=   +  = ⊗ + ⊗

       

     

   

A B A C

A B A C

C A B A C

A B A C

A B A C A B A C

A B A C

In a similar manner proved the point (b).

5. Multiplication of a 3-D,

3 3 3

× ×

-Matrix by a Scalar

Definition 5.1 The multiplication of matrix A3 3 3× ×

( )

F with scalar F

λ ∈ , is matrix C=λA3 3 3× ×

( )

F :

113 123 133 113 123 133

213 223 233 213 223 233

313 323 333 313 323

112 122 132

212 222 232

312 322 332

111 121 131

211 221 231

311 321 331

a a a a a a

a a a a a a

a a a a a a

a a a

a a a

a a a

a a a

a a a

a a a

λ λ λ

λ λ λ

λ λ λ

λ

⋅ ⋅ ⋅

 

 

 

  ⋅ ⋅ ⋅

 

 

 

 

=  =

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C

333

112 122 132

212 222 232

312 322 332

111 121 131

211 221 231

311 321 331

a a a

a a a

a a a

a a a

a a a

a a a

λ λ λ

λ λ λ

λ λ λ

λ λ λ

λ λ λ

λ λ λ

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

⋅ ⋅ ⋅

 

 

 

 

 

 

So

( )

( )

(

)

3 3 3 3 3 3

:

,

F F F

λ

λ

× × × ×

× →

A A

 

Theorem 5.1

(

3 3 3× ×

( )

F , ,+ F

)

is a vector space

Proof. is evident because,

(

3 3×

( )

F , ,+ F

)

it is the vector space, see [6][8]

[9][10].

Definition 5.2 The multiplication of matrix Am n p× ×

( )

F with scalar F

λ ∈ , is matrix C=λAm n p× ×

( )

F :

wherein each element of the matrix is multiplied (by multiplication of the field

F) with the element λ ∈F. Well, so we have

( )

(

)

: ( )

,

m n p m n p

F F F

λ λ

× × × ×

× →

A A

 

Theorem 5.2

(

m n p× ×

( )

F , ,+ F

)

is a vector space

Proof. Is evident because,

(

m n×

( )

F , ,+ F

)

it is the vector space, see [6][8]

(11)

6. Conclusion

In this article, based on geometric considerations, and mostly considering the cube, we managed to develop the idea of the 3D matrix doing so a generalization of the 2D matrices, step by step. Furthermore, we gave a unitary ring with the elements of a field F. Initially we gave the ring 3 3 3× × , 3D matrices and then

generalized this concept for m n× ×p, 3D matrices. At the end of this article, we present the scalar multiplication with the 3D matrices and we show that the set of 3 3 3× × , 3D matrix, forms a vector space over the field F.

References

[1] Artin, M. (1991) Algebra. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.

[2] Bretscher, O. (2005) Linear Algebra with Applications. 3rd Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.

[3] Connell, E.H. (2004) Elements of Abstract and Linear Algebra.

[4] Schneide, H. and Barker, G.P. (1973) Matrices and Linear Algebra (Dover Books on Mathematics). 2nd Revised Edition.

[5] Lang, S. (1987) Linear Algebra. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York.

[6] Nering, E.D. (1970) Linear Algebra and Matrix Theory. 2nd Edition, Wiley, New York.

[7] Zaka, O. and Filipi, K. (2016) The Transform of a Line of Desargues Affine Plane in an Additive Group of Its Points. International Journal of Current Research, 8, 34983-34990.

[8] Zaka, O. (2013) Abstract Algebra II. Vllamasi, Tirana. [9] Zaka, O. (2013) Linear Algebra I. Vllamasi, Tirana. [10] Zaka, O. (2013) Linear Algebra II. Vllamasi, Tirana.

[11] Zaka, O. and Filipi, K. (2016) One Construction of an Affine Plane over a Corps. Journal of Advances in Mathematics, 12.

Submit or recommend next manuscript to OALib Journal and we will pro-vide best service for you:

 Publication frequency: Monthly

9 subject areas of science, technology and medicine  Fair and rigorous peer-review system

Fast publication process

 Article promotion in various social networking sites (LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, etc.)

Maximum dissemination of your research work

Submit Your Paper Online: Click Here to Submit

Figure

Figure 1. 3-D Matrice.
Figure 2. The addition of 3 × 3 × 3, 3D matrices.
Figure 3. The addition of mxnxp, 3D matrices.
Figure 4. 
+2

References

Related documents

National Conference on Technical Vocational Education, Training and Skills Development: A Roadmap for Empowerment (Dec. 2008): Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department

lustrates the time course in S-GOT in hepa- titis contacts with abnormal variability in S-GOT. It is worth emphasizing that, in spite of living in the same households with one or

A significant decline in the concentrations of renal reduced glutathione in comparison with the control group (C) were observed in the trained and untrained rats intoxicated with

19% serve a county. Fourteen per cent of the centers provide service for adjoining states in addition to the states in which they are located; usually these adjoining states have

The ethno botanical efficacy of various parts like leaf, fruit, stem, flower and root of ethanol and ethyl acetate extracts against various clinically

The most important contributions of this paper are (i) the proposal of a concern mining approach for KDM, what may encourage other groups to start researching on

Based on the literature review, we tested for the effects of birth order (first or second born), zygosity (MZ or DZ), sex (boys or girls), GA, birth weight, mother ’ s and father ’