• No results found

Performance Measures Report

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Performance Measures Report"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Performance Measures Report

Fiscal Year 2013

Third Quarter

Submitted to the Executive and Legislative Budget Offices

(2)
(3)

Actual Performance for Output/Efficiency Measures with Updates

Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)

Agency code: 781 Agency name: Higher Education Coordinating Board

2013 Target 2013 Actual Type/Strategy/Measure 2013 YTD Percent of

Annual Target Target Range

82nd Regular Session, Performance Reporting

7/11/2013 7:44:34AM

Output Measures

1-1-1 CLOSE GAPS IN PARTICIPATION/SUCCESS 1 INCREASE IN FALL HEADCOUNT

Quarter 1 494,283.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 % * 469,568.85 - 518,997.15

Explanation of Variance: This number is reported in the fourth quarter.

Quarter 2 494,283.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 % * 469,568.85 - 518,997.15

Explanation of Variance: This number is reported in the fourth quarter.

Quarter 3 494,283.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 % * 469,568.85 - 518,997.15

Explanation of Variance: This number is reported in the fourth quarter.

2 INCREASE # DEGREES

Quarter 1 70,365.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 % * 66,846.75 - 73,883.25

Explanation of Variance: This number is reported in the fourth quarter.

Quarter 2 70,365.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 % * 66,846.75 - 73,883.25

Explanation of Variance: This number is reported in the fourth quarter.

* Varies by 5% or more from target.

(4)

2 INCREASE # DEGREES

Quarter 3 70,365.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 % * 66,846.75 - 73,883.25

Explanation of Variance: This number is reported in the fourth quarter.

2-1-19 STUDENT FINANCIAL AID PROGRAMS 1 # STUDENTS RECEIVING TX GRANTS

Quarter 1 49,907.00 51,816.00 51,816.00 103.83 % * 9,981.40 - 14,972.10

Explanation of Variance:

Quarter 2 49,907.00 23,666.00 75,482.00 151.25 % * 22,458.15 - 27,448.85

Explanation of Variance: Institutions were asked, to the extent possible, to spread available funds so that a significant number of new students could enter the program. This resulted in smaller average awards than is usual, and a higher number of award recipients.

Quarter 3 49,907.00 2,191.00 77,673.00 155.64 % * 34,934.90 - 39,925.60

Explanation of Variance: Institutions were asked, to the extent possible, to spread available funds so that a significant number of new students could enter the program. This resulted in smaller average awards than is usual, and a higher number of award recipients.

(5)

Actual Performance for Output/Efficiency Measures with Updates

Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)

Agency code: 781 Agency name: Higher Education Coordinating Board

2013 Target 2013 Actual Type/Strategy/Measure 2013 YTD Percent of

Annual Target Target Range

82nd Regular Session, Performance Reporting

7/11/2013 7:44:34AM

Output Measures

2 % TEXAS RECIPS W/BA IN 4 YEARS

Quarter 1 15.56 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % * 14.78 - 16.34

Explanation of Variance: This number is reported in the fourth quarter.

Quarter 2 15.56 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % * 14.78 - 16.34

Explanation of Variance: This number is reported in the fourth quarter.

Quarter 3 15.56 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % * 14.78 - 16.34

Explanation of Variance: This number is reported in the fourth quarter.

3 % TEXAS RECIPS W/ BA IN 6 YRS

Quarter 1 41.39 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % * 8.28 - 12.42

Explanation of Variance: This number is reported in the fourth quarter.

Quarter 2 41.39 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % * 18.63 - 22.76

Explanation of Variance: This number is reported in the fourth quarter.

* Varies by 5% or more from target.

(6)

3 % TEXAS RECIPS W/ BA IN 6 YRS

Quarter 3 41.39 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % * 28.97 - 33.11

Explanation of Variance: This number is reported in the fourth quarter.

11 % MINORITY TEG RECIPIENTS

Quarter 1 52.18 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % * 49.57 - 54.79

Explanation of Variance: This number is reported in the fourth quarter.

Quarter 2 52.18 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % * 49.57 - 54.79

Explanation of Variance: This number is reported in the fourth quarter.

Quarter 3 52.18 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % * 49.57 - 54.79

Explanation of Variance: This number is reported in the fourth quarter.

12 % TEG RECIPIENTS W/BA IN 4 YEARS

Quarter 1 34.90 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % * 33.16 - 36.65

(7)

Actual Performance for Output/Efficiency Measures with Updates

Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)

Agency code: 781 Agency name: Higher Education Coordinating Board

2013 Target 2013 Actual Type/Strategy/Measure 2013 YTD Percent of

Annual Target Target Range

82nd Regular Session, Performance Reporting

7/11/2013 7:44:34AM

Output Measures

12 % TEG RECIPIENTS W/BA IN 4 YEARS

Quarter 2 34.90 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % * 33.16 - 36.65

Explanation of Variance: This number is reported in the fourth quarter.

Quarter 3 34.90 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % * 33.16 - 36.65

Explanation of Variance: This number is reported in the fourth quarter.

3-1-1 N HACKERMAN ADVANCED RESEARCH PGM 2 # RESEARCH PROJECTS FUNDED

Quarter 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 % * 0.00 - 0.00

Explanation of Variance: This number is reported in the fourth quarter.

Quarter 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 % * 0.00 - 0.00

Explanation of Variance: This number is reported in the fourth quarter.

Quarter 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 % * 0.00 - 0.00

Explanation of Variance: This number is reported in the fourth quarter.

* Varies by 5% or more from target.

(8)

1-1-2 CLOSE THE GAPS LOAN PROGRAM 1 DEFAULT RATE ON H-H LOANS

Quarter 1 10.17 % 10.72 % 10.72 % 105.41 % * 9.66 - 10.68

Explanation of Variance: There was an increase in accounts entering into the judgement category relative to the overall growth of the portfolio.

Quarter 2 10.17 % 10.67 % 10.67 % 104.92 % 9.66 - 10.68

Quarter 3 10.17 % 10.75 % 10.75 % 105.70 % * 9.66 - 10.68

References

Related documents

University of Maryland, College Park Information Science Julie Resendiz UMBC Social Work Academic Achievement Academic Achievement Award Recipients Award Recipients. These

The effects of the process parameters (ultrasonic power, spindle speed and feedrate) on the output variables (edge chipping size, cutting force, surface roughness, and

Using the reported index sizes from the search engines they estimated the size of the indexed WWW in 1997 to be around 200 million pages (Bharat and Broder 1998 ).. Gulli and

In the present study, we addressed that Sp infection specifically induces autophagy through the PI3K/AKT/mTOR autophagy pathway and ROS hypergeneration in a human pulmonary epi-

It can be inferred that a mean over the thermal fields of the SOM nodes (Figure 2 of the paper) is resulting in an axisymmetric warm- core structure captured by the composite of

There was a significant association between smoking behaviors among students and their age, gender, type of accommodation, field of study, income status, duration of study,

 Reduce the average number of days to process appeals to no more than four (4) days, to improve school attendance and academic performance in FY 2013. PERFORMANCE

The RAA Award Recipients: President Bechta stated that the awards will be physically presented in September Board meeting, assuming that the University will reopen