• No results found

SH 183 MANAGED LANES PROJECT

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "SH 183 MANAGED LANES PROJECT"

Copied!
17
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

SH 183 MANAGED LANES

PROJECT

(2)

May 29, 2014

Project Scope

 Design, Build Finance and Maintain 27.8 miles of managed lanes

 Minimum Base Scope (19.6 Miles)

– SH 183 from SH 121 to IH 35E (14.8 Miles)

– LP 12 from SH 183 to I35E (2.5 Miles)

– SH 114 from SH 183 to Rochelle (2.3 Miles)

 Additional Scope Components 1-4 (8.2 miles)

 $850M Available Public Funds.

– $600M paid prior to Substantial Completion

– $250M paid over 5 years after Substantial Completion

 Routine and Lifecycle Operations and Maintenance (O&M) for 25 years, with handback requirements.

2 SH 183 Managed Lanes Project

(3)
(4)

May 29, 2014

Project Scope (Continued)

Operations and Maintenance

– SH 183, plus Components 1 and 2

– SH 114 – SH 183 to Rochelle Blvd.

– Loop 12 – SH 183 to IH-35E

25 year obligation with fixed prices

– Prices bid in 2014 dollars

– Automatically escalated by inflation

Includes:

– Roadway operations and maintenance

– Preventative Maintenance

– Capital Maintenance and Renewal

Handback requirements at Termination

4

(5)

Procurement history

February 20, 2013 — issued request for

qualifications (RFQ).

August 22, 2013 — short-listed four

proposers.

November 7, 2013 — issued final request

for proposals (RFP).

April 14, 2014 — received three proposals.

May 29, 2014

recommend conditional

award

(6)

May 29, 2014

Equity Owners:

SH 183 Constructors (Fluor Enterprises, Inc., Balfour Beatty Infrastructure Inc., The

Lane Construction Corporation).

 SH 183 Operators (Fluor Enterprises Inc., DBi Services LLC). Major non-equity members and other team members:

6

SH 183 Managed Lanes Project

Submitted Proposals* — Airport Expressway Partners

*alphabetical order

 AECOM Technical Services, Inc.

 Aguirre & Fields LP

 Applied Research Associates Inc.

 Arredondo, Zepeda, & Brunz LLC

 AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc

 Balfour Beatty LLC

 The Bank of Nova Scotia

 DeAngelo Brothers LLC

 Fluor Corporation

 K Strategies Group LLC

 Kleinfelder Central Inc.

 Lane Industries Incorporated

 Maldonado-Burkett Intelligent

Transportation Systems

 Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

 Parsons Brinkerhoff Inc.

 Raba Kistner Infrastructure

 Rios Engineering LLC

(7)

Submitted Proposals*

SH 183 Mobility Partners

Equity Owners:

Cintra Infraestructuras, SA

 Major non-equity members and other team members:

*alphabetical order

 AIA Engineers Ltd.

 Alliance Geotechnical Group Inc.

 Bird Advocacy & Consulting Inc.

 CivilTech Engineering Inc.

 Cox|McLain Environmental Consulting Inc.

 Ferrovial Agroman USA

 Fugro Consultants Inc.

 Granite Construction Company

 Lockwood, Andrews & Newman Inc.

 The Louis Berger Group Inc.

 Professional Services Industries Inc.

 Solaray Engineering Inc.

(8)

May 29, 2014

Equity Owners:

Kiewit Development Company

Kiewit Infrastructure South Co

.

Major non-equity members and other team members:

8

SH 183 Managed Lanes Project

Submitted Proposals*

-

Southgate Mobility Partners

*alphabetical order

 ARS Engineers Inc.

 Austin Bridge & Road L.P.

 Burgess Engineering and Testing Inc.

 Corsair Consulting LLC

 CP&Y Inc.

 Kiewit Infrastructure Group Inc.

 Kiewit Infrastructure South Co.

 Lamb-Star Engineering LP

 Infrastructure Corporation of America

 Innovative Engineering Associates Inc.

 Parson Transportation Group

 Plenary Group USA

 SouthGate Constructors JV

(9)

Evaluation of proposals

 Implemented a pre-established and rigorous procedure to evaluate and select the proposal

that offers the best value.

 Separate pass/fail, technical and price evaluations.

 Evaluation subcommittees provided scoring recommendations to the Evaluation Selection

Recommendation Committee (ESRC).

 ESRC provided scoring recommendations to the Project Steering Committee.

 Project Steering Committee reviewed ESRC recommendations and made final

(10)

May 29, 2014

Tier approach

Objective:

Most scope for $850 million consistent with technical provisions

 Objective: Obtain bid prices for additional scope not in Base Scope bid by developer.

 Base bid equals:

– Minimum Base Scope, plus

– Zero to four Alternative Scope Components bid in order

 Tiers defined by number of alternative scope components in

base bid.

 Proposers in same tier evaluated against each other.

 Apparent best value proposer selected from tier with the most

alternative scope components.

10

(11)

Evaluation results summary

(12)

May 29, 2014

Southgate Mobility Partners

Equity owner:

Kiewit Development Company

Kiewit Infrastructure South Co.

Major non-equity members and other team members:

12

SH 183 Managed Lanes Project

Best value recommendation

 ARS Engineers Inc.

 Austin Bridge & Road L.P.

 Burgess Engineering and Testing Inc.

 Corsair Consulting LLC

 CP&Y Inc.

 Kiewit Infrastructure Group Inc.

 Kiewit Infrastructure South Co.

 Lamb-Star Engineering LP

 Infrastructure Corporation of America

 Innovative Engineering Associates Inc.

 Parsons Transportation Group

 Plenary Group USA

 SouthGate Constructors JV

(13)

Evaluation results summary

Tier 1 – Proposal Evaluations

Southgate Mobility

Partners

Base Minimum Scope, plus

Components 1, 2, 3, & 4

90.57 Pts.

Tier 3 – Proposal Evaluations

Airport Expressway

Partners

Base Minimum Scope, plus

Components 1 & 2

93.52 Pts.

SH 183 Mobility Partners

Base Minimum Scope, plus

Components 1 & 2

(14)

May 29, 2014

Southgate Mobility Partners

Base Bid (Min Base plus Components 1-4)

$ 847,600,000

O&M w/Handback (25 years):

$ 171,800,000 *

Project completed

1,260 days (3.5 years)

14

SH 183 Managed Lanes Project

Evaluation results summary

(15)

Next steps

 Negotiate final terms of development

agreement.

 Final Third Party Approvals

 Execute contract for development,

design, construction, operations and maintenance of the project.

 NTP 1 is expected Fall 2014

 Begin Construction late 2014 or early

2015

 Substantial Completion expected Spring

(16)

May 29, 2014

Evaluation team

16

SH 183 Managed Lanes Project

 TxDOT Strategic Projects Division

– Ed Pensock – Katie Nees – Randy Redmond – Dan Peden – Joel Mallard – Dieter Billek – Lucio Vasquez – Scott Spradlin – Dawn Scheel – David Leavell – Bill Reichert

 TxDOT Office of General Counsel

– Claire McGuinness

– Jim Bailey

– Jack Ingram

 TxDOT Debt Management Office

– Benjamin Asher

– Jennifer Wright

– Jonathan Hurst

– Sara Chapa

 TxDOT District Offices

– Bill Hale

– Brian Barth

– Kelly Selman

– Ray Fisher

– Gordon Moodie

 TxDOT Division Offices

– Marcy Saenz (Toll Operations)

– Geetha Chandar (Bridge)

(17)

Questions?

References

Related documents

Rawa lpindi Tashkent Astana Moscow Bogota Quito Rio de Janeiro o Santiago o Accr Accra a Rabat t Dar es Salaam ria P t Pretor or Lago g s Vanc ouver V Kathmandu VALLETTA,

We then also allowed the normalization of the primary continuum and the Fe K α line parameters to vary while constraining the normalization of the reflected component to scale with

Graduates 13 students who enrolled at CHSM eventually graduated; 19 graduations were celebrated during the 2005-2005 school year Dropouts/Transfers 9 students dropped out or

• In case of other goods ,when notice of intention of resale is given by unpaid seller to the buyer & buyer does not within reasonable time pay or tender the price. (B) RIGHT

Both the slit width and slit-screen separation affect the result of the experiment in such a way that at constant slit width, an increase in slit-screen distance

Project Manager The Project Manager is contracted by the Steering Committee or the Project Sponsor to deliver the defined project outputs and is responsible for organising

o Assurance – verify on behalf of members of the Project Steering Committee, whether the project is being managed and products are being produced in line with relevant standards

1) Kemampuan pegawai dalam berkomunikasi, 2) Pegawai bertanggung jawab atas pelayanan yang diberikan, 3) Tersedia fasilitas penunjang kepada pelanggan, 4)