• No results found

Laser system schematic

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Laser system schematic"

Copied!
16
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Laser system schematic

2ω 4ω

1.55 μs

200 μs, 5-50 Hz

15 kW 10 μJ 270 μs

~2332 pulses 370 nJ/pulse

~2332 e- bunches

2.33 nC/bunch Beam conditioner 1.5 GHz Nd:YLF oscillator

400 μs, 5-50 Hz

Diode pump 18 kW pk

3 kW 2 μJ 3-pass Nd:YLF

amplifier x300 CW

preamp

3 pass Nd:YLF amplifier

x5

200 μs, 5-50 Hz

Diode pump 22 kW pk

Optical gate (Pockels cell) Energy stabiliser (Pockels cell) Feedback stabilisation Phase coding

(2)

Practical layout

High Q preamp

High Q oscillator Coding

Faraday isolator Amp 1

Amp 2 1.54 μs

slicing Noise control

1 pulse slicing

HG HG

Thermal

lensing correction

(3)

Amplifier head design

Laser head assembly

Nd:YLF rod

• 7mm diameter 8 cm long – Amp. 1 • 10 mm diameter 11 cm long – Amp. 2 • 1% doping level

• Deep surface etching for higher fracture limit

Glass tube The rod

water

Diodes

Lens

5 Diode laser stucks

• 18 kW total peak power – Amp. 1 • 22 kW total peak power – Amp. 2 • 400 μs – Amp.1

(4)

Amplifier 1

• Amp 1 operational and tested at 5 Hz and 50 Hz

• Rod failure at 50 Hz may be due to non-saturated operation • Expected output has been delivered (actually slightly exceeded) • Near-field uniformity should improve with better rod

(5)

Amplifier 1

Near-field profile is flattened by saturation but shows some effects of rod inhomogeneities

0 100 200 300 400

Time (μs)

0 200 400 600 Ga in 0 1000 2000 3000 Po w e r (W )

• Measured output from Amp 1 exceeds target power

(3 kW from 3 passes)

• Output saturates in agreement with model

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 100 200 300 400 500

Diode current: 90A

Time (microsec)

Pow

er (W)

Gain

(6)

Amplifier 2

0 100 200 300 400

Time (μs)

0 1000 2000 3000 Ga in 0 3000 6000 9000 12000 P o w e r (W ) 22.8 kW 21.5 kW

2 passes 20.2 kW 1 pass 20.2 kW

• 10kW from Amp 2 corresponds to 6.7μJ/pulse • Beam uniformity is better than Amp 1 (fine

fringes are an artefact) but rod is underfilled

• Overfilling improves saturation so steady state is reached but energy is reduced

0 100 200 300 400

Time (μs)

0 1000 2000 3000 Ga in 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 P o w e r (W )

(7)

Pulse slicing

-0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

-0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8

• Risetime is ~4ns

• Extinction ratio, throughput and level of induced noise remain to be optimised (noise level in above trace is misleading)

• Power handling, with additional AOM, remains to be confirmed

6 8 10 12 14

Time (ns) -0.01

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05

PD S

ig

n

al

(

V

)

(8)

Frequency multiplying

• Crystals are available for two frequency quadrupling schemes:

2 × type I in BBO (preferred) Type II in KTP + type I in BBO (allows two IR polarisations, perhaps for 3 GHz

multiplexing)

• Tests with Amp 1 (low energy) showed an IR-UV conversion efficiency of up to 7%

Extrapolation to Amp 2 should allow system specification to be met

(9)

Task listing

Oscillator & preamplifier Complete April 2005 Amplifier 1 (5 Hz) Complete April 2006 1.54 μs slicing (no AOM) Demonstrated – July 2006 Amplifier 2 (5 Hz) Demonstrated – July 2006 Phase coding Designed

Frequency multiplying Demonstrated with Amp 1 – August 2006

Safety and machine protection After delivery

Coding finalisation After delivery

Frequency multiplying finalisation After delivery

Amplitude stabilisation After delivery

Single-pulse and AOM slicing After delivery

50 Hz testing After delivery

50Hz thermal lensing correction After delivery

(10)

Lasers at CERN

Oscillator in operation – September 2006

Preamplifier in operation after service by High Q Laser – November 2006

Amplifier 1 in operation – November 2006

Amplifier 2 assembled and tested (beams not optimized) – January 2007

2nd amplifier

Pockels cell

Breadboard

Laser beam to cathode

Phase coding

Faraday isolator 1st amplifier

HighQ oscillator HighQ amplifier

Flipping mirrors

Beam dump f = 300 mm

f = - 250 mm

f = -100 mm λ/2

f = 100 mm

f = - 150 mm f = 400 mm

f = - 100 mm BBO SHG f = 800 mm

BBO FHG f = 300 mm

Laser beam to CALIFES

(11)

Oscillator Preamplifier Amplifier 1

Amplifier 2

Pulse slicing Pockels cell

Fiber-optics coding system

(12)

Amplifiers hardware

Amplifier 2 Chillers for amplifier diodes

55 l/min and 75 l/min Drivers for 5 diode laser

stucks of Amplifier 2 120 A each

(13)

Pulse coding

EO Modulator

140.7 ns

macropulses Variable

delay

Variable attenuator 140.7 + 0.333 ns delay 320 mW in

from oscillator ~30 mW out

to preamp

• Fibre modulation, based on telecoms technology, is fast but lossy and limited in average power

• Measurements on the High Q system suggest 10dB loss before the preamp results in <3dB output reduction

• Delay can be adjusted by varying the fibre temperature (~0.5ps/°C) • Attenuation can be controlled by varying the fibre bending losses

(14)

Pulse slicing with AOM

AO Deflector

Output to doubler Pockels

cell Input from

Amp 2

RF Driver

Pockels Driver

AO deflector could reduce power loading on Pockels cell by up to 80% for most of

the macropulse

(15)

Laser-room ÎDB gun 15 m 0.05 μs Laser-room ÎPB gun 75 m 0.25μs Photo-injector ÎDelay Loop 85 m 0.2833 μs PB macro-pulse length 0.021312μs Delay Loop 42 m 0.14 μs

TL Delay Loop ÎComb. Ring 30 m 0.1 μs TOTAL time 0.271312μs Combiner Ring 84 m 0.28 μs Conv. 1.5 GHz to 3 GHz 0.021312μs TL Comb. ring ÎProbe Beam 48 m 0.16 μs PB selection after DB 1.860709μs

Total with 1 DL and 4.5 C. Ring 598 m 1.9933 μs Macro pulse length 0.14 μs Filling time of PETS+Acc. 0.02 μs TOTAL time 2.1533 μs

First pulse of the Drive beam Probe Beam

(16)

Thank you for your

attention

Acknowledgments

RAL

Marta Dival

Graeme Hirst

Kurdi Gabor

Emma Springate

Bill Martin

Ian Musgrave

CERN

Guy Suberlucq

Roberto Losito

Nathalie Champault

Arvind Kumar

References

Related documents

9.2.4 Increasing socioeconomic gradient for lifespan variation associated with Scotland‘s deteriorating ranking within Western Europe 358 9.2.5 Ages and causes of death

Motivation Problem statement Simulation scenario Results of performance prediction ConclusionsB. A study on machine learning and regression based models for performance

The algorithm will only match applicants employers preferred for NESP positions to NESP positions and applicants employers preferred for NETP positions to NETP positions. This way

In the previous sections, we dis- cuss the expectation that a neural network exploiting the fractional convolution should perform slightly worse than a pure binary (1-bit weights

Steele of Stanford University Online High said that shift is already underway: In a recent survey of ASCA members, she and her colleagues found that more than one-fourth of

• Our goal is to make Pittsburgh Public Schools First Choice by offering a portfolio of quality school options that promote high student achievement in the most equitable and

College Mathematics (3 Credits) Biology (6 Credits) Arts and Humanities 3 Arts and Humanities 3 TOTAL 35 20 8.00 **Total up RED # ** Excess credits 0.00 8.00 Analyzing and