• No results found

UNIT 10 - INTELLIGENCE PPT 12.12.12..ppt

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "UNIT 10 - INTELLIGENCE PPT 12.12.12..ppt"

Copied!
52
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Three Recent Controversies

Memory War

– Are traumatic experiences repressed and later recovered with benefit?

• Gender War

– To what extent do nature and nurture shape our behaviors as men and women?

• Intelligence War

– Do we have an inborn general mental capacity, and if so, how do we quantify it into a

meaningful number?

What Is Intelligence?

Experts agree that

intelligence is a concept and not a thing.

Reification – reasoning error

that views an abstract, immaterial concept as if it were a concrete thing.

Wrong to say “She has an IQ

of 120”

Right to say “She once

(2)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

What Is Intelligence?

Intelligence – mental quality

consisting of the ability to learn from experience, solve problems, and use knowledge to adapt to new situations

– It is a socially constructed concept: cultures deem

intelligence whatever enables success in those cultures.

Historically it has meant “school

smarts”

General or Specific Abilities?

General Intelligence (g) – a

general intelligence factor that , according to Charles Spearman (1863-1945) and others, underlies specific mental abilities and is therefore measured by every task on an

(3)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

General or Specific Abilities?

Factor Analysis – a

statistical procedure that identifies clusters of related items (called factors) on a test; used to identify

different dimensions of

performance that underlie a person’s total score.

Spearman helped develop

General or Specific Abilities?

Factor Analysis (cont’d)

Spearman noted that those

who score high in one area such as verbal intelligence, typically score higher than average in other areas, such as spatial or reasoning ability.

– Said a common skill set ( the “g” factor) underlies all

(4)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

General or Specific Abilities?

L.L. Thurstone (1887-1955)

– tested people using 55

different tests, and came up with 7 clusters of primary mental abilities: (listed)

Conclusion – those who

excelled in one of these areas generally excelled in other areas (evidence of a g

factor)

General or Specific Abilities?

1)word fluency

2) verbal comprehension 3)spatial ability

(5)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

General or Specific Abilities?

Like an athlete who may have

a skill set to perform well at many athletic tasks, so too might we have a mental skill set to perform well at many mental tasks.

Kanazawa – asserts that g

scores do correlate with

academic situations, but not with evolutionary situations (page 406)

Theories of Multiple Intelligences

Howard Gardner (1983,

2006) – views intelligence as multiple abilities that come in packages.

Savant syndrome – a

(6)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Theories of Multiple Intelligences

4 in 5 savants are malesMany savants also have

autism, a developmental disorder

– Kim Peek – memory whiz who inspired movie Rain Man

Has memorized over 9000

books and can give detailed driving directions within any U.S. city

• Cannot button own clothes

Theories of Multiple Intelligences

Savant example: Stephen

Wiltshire takes 30 minute helicopter ride and a visit to top of skyscraper, he

accurately drew the Tokyo skyline in 7 days.

Gardner: we do not have

an intelligence, but rather

(7)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Gardner’s Eight Intelligences

Linguistic

Logical-MathematicalMusical

Spatial

Bodily-KinestheticIntrapersonal (self)Interpersonal (others)Naturalist

Intelligence

“g matters” – intelligence

scores that predicted graduate school success also predicted later job success.

Recipe for success

combines talent with grit: highly successful people are conscientious,

(8)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

10-Year Rule

Anders Ericsson reports a

10-year rule: for expert performance in chess,

dancing, sports, computer programming, music, and medicine (virtually all

categories), it takes 10 years of intense, daily practice.

Sternberg’s 3 Intelligences

Robert Sternberg (1985,

1999, 2003) agrees with Gardner that there is more than traditional general intelligence, but he

(9)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Sternberg’s 3 Intelligences

Analytical (academic

problem-solving) Intelligence

Well-defined problems having

a single right answer

Creative Intelligence

Reacting adaptively to novel

situations and generating novel ideas

Practical Intelligence

Required for everyday tasks

Sternberg and Wagner

Have “recently” developed

new tests of creativity and practical thinking

Prove to be a more accurate

(10)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Bill Gates Quote:

“You have to be careful, if you’re

good at something, to make sure you don’t think you’re good at other things that you aren’t

necessarily so good at…Because I’ve been very successful at

(software development) people come in and expect that I have wisdom about topics that I don’t.”

Bill Gates (1998)

Intelligence Theories Review

Check out Table 10.2 on page 410

of text.

Spearman

General intelligence

Thurstone

– Primary mental abilities

Gardner

– 8 multiple intelligences

Sternberg

(11)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Intelligence & Creativity

Creativity – the ability to

produce novel and valuable ideas

A certain level of aptitude

(score of 120 on a standard intelligence test) is necessary but not sufficient for

creativity.

Exceptionally creative people

usually score no higher than peers on intelligence tests.

Intelligence & Creativity

Convergent thinking

– Intelligence tests that require a single correct answer

Divergent thinking

Creativity tests like “How many

uses can you think of for a brick?” • Injuries to…

Left Parietal Lobe – damages

convergent thinking

(12)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Intelligence & Creativity

• Sternberg’s 5 Components to Creativity:

– Expertise

• A well-developed knowledge base

Imaginative thinking skills

• Ability to see things in novel ways, to recognize patterns, to make connections

A venturesome personality

• Seeks new experiences, tolerates ambiguity and risk, perseveres in overcoming obstacles

Intelligence & Creativity

Intrinsic motivationBeing driven more by

interest, satisfaction, and challenge than by external pressures

A creative environment

Sparks, supports, and refines

(13)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Emotional Intelligence

Social Intelligence – the

know-how involved in comprehending social situations and managing oneself successfully.

Emotional Intelligence – the

ability to perceive,

understand, manage, and use emotions.

Emotional Intelligence

• Perceive

Recognize in faces, music, storiesUnderstand

Predict them and how they

change and blend

Manage

Know how to express them in

varied situations

Use

Enable adaptive or creative

(14)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Emotional Intelligence

Those scoring high in

emotional intelligence:

Enjoy higher-quality

interactions with friends

– Exhibit modestly better job performance

– Can delay gratification in

pursuit of long-range rewards

Are emotionally in tune with

others

Brain Size and Complexity

There is a +.33 correlation

between brain size and intelligence scores

Does not always prove true

Einstein’s brain was 15%

larger in the parietal lobe’s lower region – which is a center for processing

(15)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Brain Size and Complexity

“Experience alters the

brain”

Rats raised in stimulating

environments developed thicker, heavier cortexes.

– Intelligence is due to the development of neural connections

– Highly educated people die with more synapses than less-educated people

Brain Size and Complexity

Highly intelligent people

differ in their neural plasticity

• Cortex stays thin longer, allowing more plasticity until the age of 11 to 13

• Average intelligence kids’ cortex reaches peak

(16)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Brain Size & Complexity

Gray Matter = neural cell

bodies

White Matter = axons and

dendrites

Higher intelligence scores

were linked with more gray matter in brain areas

responsible for memory, attention, and language.

Brain Function

As people contemplate

questions on intelligence test, a frontal lobe area just above the outer edge of the eyebrows becomes

especially active:

In the left brain for verbal

questions

(17)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Brain Function

This location in the frontal

lobe may be a “global workspace for organizing and coordinating

information”

Quick-wittedness

Speed of perception

– Speed of neural processing of information

Brain Function

Perceptual Speed

Example: a stimulus is briefly

flashed, then masked. Those who perceive very quickly tend to score somewhat higher on intelligence tests

Neurological Speed

(18)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Brain Function

Why do fast reactions on

simple tasks predict intelligence?

May reflect core information

processing ability

– Faster cognitive processing may allow more information to be acquired

Assessing Intelligence

Francis Galton (1822-1911)

– cousin of Charles Darwin; did an assessment of

“intellectual strengths” at the 1884 London Exposition

Tried to measure reaction

time, sensory acuity, muscular power, body proportions

An attempt at a simple

(19)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Assessing Intelligence

Early 20th century, France

passed law requiring all children attend school.

Alfred Binet (1857-1911) was

hired to study how to objectively identify

individuals with special needs

Assessing Intelligence

Mental Age – a measure of

intelligence test

performance devised by

Binet; the chronological age that most typically

corresponds to a given level of performance. Thus, a

(20)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Assessing Intelligence

Binet’s intelligence test had

a single practical purpose: to identify French

schoolchildren needing

special attention; he feared his test would be used to label children and limit their opportunities.

Assessing Intelligence

Lewis Terman (1877-1956) –

a professor at Stanford

University, he modified

Binet’s test of French children to fit California school children; it came to be called the

(21)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Assessing Intelligence

William Stern – German

psychologist who developed the famous intelligence

quotient (IQ):

IQ = mental age /

chronological age x 100

Assessing Intelligence

An average child whose

mental and chronological ages are the same has an IQ of 100.

IQ formula works well for

(22)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Assessing Intelligence

Today intelligence tests no

longer compute IQ, but compare the test taker’s performance relative to the average performance of

others the same age.

2/3 of all test-takers fall

between 85 and 115, with an average still being 100

Assessing Intelligence

U.S. government used

Terman’s test to screen incoming immigrants and WWI army recruits, the first mass administration of test

As a result, 1924 immigration

law reduced quotas for Southern and Eastern

Europeans to less than 1/5 that for Northern and

(23)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Assessing Intelligence

Intelligence tests not only

predicted innate mental abilities, but also education and familiarity with the

culture assumed by the

test. (The tests were biased)

Modern Tests of Mental Abilities

Achievement tests – a test

designed to assess what a person has learned.

Aptitude tests – a test

designed to predict a person’s future

performance; aptitude is the capacity to learn.

Most tests measure both

(24)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Modern Tests of Mental Abilities

Wechsler Adult Intelligence

Scale (WAIS) – the WAIS is the most widely used

intelligence test; contains verbal and performance (nonverbal) subtests.

Wechsler Intelligence Scale

for Children (WISC) – a version for school-age children

Principles of Test Construction

To be widely accepted,

psychological tests must be:

– Standardized

Reliable – Valid

Standardization – defining

meaningful scores by comparison with the

(25)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Principles of Test Construction

Normal Curve – the

symmetrical bell-shaped curve that describes the distribution of many

physical and psychological attributes. Most scores fall near the average, and fewer and fewer scores lie near the extremes.

Principles of Test Construction

To keep the average scores

near 100, both the Stanford-Binet and Wechsler scales are

periodically restandardized.

Flynn Effect – the general

effect that overall

(26)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Reliability

Reliability – the extent to

which a test yields consistent results, as

assessed by the consistency of scores on two halves of the test, or on retesting

When retested, people’s

scores generally match their first score closely on both the WISC and WAIS, therefore they are reliable

Validity

Validity – the extent to which

a test measures or predicts what it is supposed to.

Content Validity – the extent to

which a test samples the behavior that is of interest

Predictive Validity – the success

with which a test predicts the behavior it is designed to

(27)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Validity

The predictive power of

aptitude scores diminishes as students move up the educational ladder.

If a university takes only those

applicants with very high aptitude scores, those scores cannot possibly predict much.

When used with a restricted

range of people, the test loses predictive validity.

Dynamics of Intelligence

Stability or Change

throughout life?

Prior to age 3, characteristics

of infants only modestly predict children’s future aptitudes

By age 4, children’s

performance on intelligence tests begins to predict their adolescent and adult scores

High scoring adolescents tend

(28)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Dynamics of Intelligence

Intelligence tests given to

5-year olds do predict school achievement

By age 7, intelligence test

scores stabilize, and consistency of scores increases with age

Consistency of scores by

late adolescence on GRE and SAT tests are high

Dynamics of Intelligence

Scotland tested all 10 ½ to

11 ½ -year olds in 1932

Scotland then tested 542

survivors of that group near the year 2000, as 80-year olds

Their findings were

(29)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Dynamics of Intelligence

Scottish study continued:

High-scoring 11-year olds:

More likely to be living

independently as 70-year olds

Less likely to have suffered

late-onset Alzheimer’s disease

High/Low scores at 11-years:

– Of girls scoring in top 25%, 70% were still living

Of girls scoring in bottom 25%,

only 45% were still living

Dynamics of Intelligence

A study of Nuns showed

(30)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Extremes of Intelligence

Low Extreme

Mental Retardation –

(intellectual disability) a condition of limited mental ability, indicated by an

intelligence score of 70 or below and difficulty

adapting to the demands of life; varies from mild to

profound

Extremes of Intelligence

Effects 1% of populationMales outnumber females

by 50%

Down syndrome – a

condition of retardation and associated physical

disorders caused by an

(31)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Dynamics of Intelligence

Treatment of Individuals:

Until mid-19th century, cared for at home (agricultural)

– During early-mid 20th century, residential schools became warehouses for the low extreme, giving residents little attention, no privacy, and no hope

• Parents advised to separate from their children prior to developing an attachment

Dynamics of Intelligence

Late 20th century, encouraged to live as normal as possible within mainstream society

Group homes helped

provide a protective living arrangement

– With restandardization of tests due to Flynn effect, those who border a score of 70 may qualify or not

(32)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Dynamics of Intelligence

Those qualifying as being

mentally retarded:

Become eligible for special

education

– Receive Social Security payments for those with a mental disability

Dynamics of Intelligence

Degrees of Mental

Retardation (and IQ scores):

Mild (50-70)

– Moderate (35-50)

Severe (20-35)

– Profound (Below 20)

(33)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Dynamics of Intelligence

In 2002 the U.S. Supreme

Court ruled that the

execution of people with mental retardation is “cruel and unusual punishment”

– U.S. is one of only a few

countries still having a “death penalty”

Dynamics of Intelligence

High Extreme:“Children with

extraordinary academic gifts are sometimes more isolated, introverted, and in their own worlds, but most thrive.”

Most are healthy,

(34)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Dynamics of Intelligence

“Gifted Child” programs

Tracking aptitude sometimes

creates a self-fulfilling prophecy

– May serve to widen the achievement gap between ability groups, and increase social isolation between them

– Minority and low-income youth are more often placed in lower academic groups

Dynamics of Intelligence

Children have different

gifts:

Math, verbal, art, social

leadership, etc.

By providing appropriate

developmental placement suited to each child’s

(35)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Genetic & Environmental Influences on Intelligence

People who share the same

genes (family members) also share comparable mental abilities

Intelligence test scores of

identical twins appear as though same individual was tested twice

Genetic & Environmental Influences on Intelligence

Identical twins have very

similar gray matter (neural cell body) volume,

especially in areas linked to verbal and spatial

intelligence

Intelligence is

(36)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Genetic & Environmental Influences on Intelligence

Adopted children

Mental similarities between

adopted children and their adoptive parents wane with age, until correlation hits zero

– Adopted children’s scores over time become more like those of their biological

parents

Genetic & Environmental Influences on Intelligence

The most

genetically similar

people have the

most similar

(37)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Heritability

Heritability: the proportion

of variation among

individuals that we can attribute to genes (Unit 4)

– Never pertains to an individual – only to why people differ from one another

For intelligence it is about

50%

Heritability

“In a world of clones,

heritability would be zero.”

“Heritability of boys raised

(38)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Heritability

Environment enhances

performance:

If you have a natural aptitude

for academics, you will be more likely to stay in school, read books, and ask questions – all of which will amplify

your cognitive brain power.

Environmental Influences

Severe deprivation does

leave footprints on the brain

Romanian and Iranian

orphanages observe children who cannot sit up unassisted at age 2 or walk at age 4

Extreme deprivation was

(39)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Environmental Influences

Language-fostering games

significantly helped orphans

– Among the poor,

environmental conditions can override genetic differences, depressing cognitive

development

Less-qualified teachersMalnutrition

Sensory DeprivationSocial Isolation

Environmental Influences

Can parents “fast-forward”

a normal infant into genius?

All babies should have normal

exposure to sights, sounds, and speech

– Evidence shows there is little to be gained by extreme

efforts to enhance early intelligence

(40)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Schooling and Intelligence

Schooling and intelligence

both enhance later income

Project Head Start (1965)

U.S. Government-funded

preschool program

– Mostly for families below poverty level

Schooling and Intelligence

Quality programs help:

Offer individual attention – Increase children’s school

readiness

Decreases likelihood of

repeating a grade

(41)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Schooling and Intelligence

What we accomplish also

depends on our beliefs and motivation:

Those with a “growth

mindset” see intelligence as something that can be

modified, and are usually more successful

Those with a “fixed mindset”

tend to be less successful

Group Differences in Intelligence Scores

Our gender similarities far

outnumber our gender differences

In terms of intelligence, the

(42)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Gender Comparisons

Females are somewhat

better than males at:

Spelling

– Verbal fluency and remembering words

Remembering and locating

objects

– Sensations of touch, taste, and odor

– Emotion detecting

Gender Comparisons

Males and females are

nearly the same at:

Math and spatial aptitudesmales are slightly better at

math problem solving

• females are slightly better at math computation

In western cultures, more

(43)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Gender Comparisons

Males are more likely than

females to overestimate their own test scores

Both males and females

rate scores of their:

– Father higher than mother

– Brother higher than sister

Son higher than daughter

Gender Comparisons

Gender score differences are

sharpest at the extremes

Among 12- to 14-year olds

scoring extremely high on SAT math, boys outnumber girls 13:1

Boys have an edge in AP

physics and computer science exams

99% of chess grandmasters are

(44)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Gender Comparisons

Steven Pinker (2005) sees

both biological and social influences

Life priorities – Risk-taking

– Math reasoning

Spatial abilities

Gender Comparisons

Elizabeth Spelke (2005)

cautions that male/female comparisons are

oversimplified

– In gender-equal cultures of Iceland and Sweden, there is little gender gap in math

Males are usually not tested

(45)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Gender Comparisons

Greater Male Variability

Males mental ability scores

vary more than females

– Boys outnumber girls at both the low and high extremes

More boys than girls are

found in special education programs

– Boys talk later

– Boys stutter more

Ethnic Similarities/Differences

Racial groups differ in their

average intelligence scores

High-scoring people (and

groups) are more likely to attain high levels of

(46)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Ethnic Similarities/Differences

Bell curve of intelligence

scores is centered for:

Whites (IQ 100)

– American Blacks (IQ 85)

Hispanics (IQ roughly 93)

*There are many exceptions to these numbers. They only represent a generalization of statistics.

Ethnic Similarities/Differences

Ethnic differences are

evident in many other groups around the world, not simply in the U.S.

Individual differences within

a race are much greater

(47)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Ethnic Similarities/Differences

Asian students outperform

North American students on math achievement and

aptitude tests

– Asian students also spend 30% more days per year attending school, and more time out of school studying math

Ethnic Similarities/Differences

• White and Black:

Infants have scored equally well

on an infant intelligence measure

Exhibit similar

information-processing skill

Various ethnic groups have

experienced “golden ages”:

Greeks, Egyptians, Romans,

Arabs, Aztecs, Asians, etc.

Difficult to attribute natural

(48)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Ethnic Similarities/Differences

Black and Whites:

High school environments

differ greatly in quality, and therefore the gap grows wider here

– College environments of comparable quality see the gap narrow greatly

The Question of Bias

Two meanings of bias:

A test that measures

performance differences caused by cultural

experiences and education

– A test that predicts future behavior only for some groups of test-takers (Ex. males or females )

(49)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

The Question of Bias

Near consensus among

psychologists is that major U.S. aptitude tests (ACT, SAT) are NOT biased.

Test-Taker’s Expectations

Stereotype Threat – a

self-confirming concern that

one will be evaluated based on a negative stereotype

– Blacks scored higher when tested by Blacks rather than Whites

Women have scored higher

when no male test-takers were in the group

(50)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Test-Taker’s Expectations

Women’s chess play drops

sharply when they think they are playing a male rather than a female

– Telling students they

probably won’t succeed at something serves to erode test and school performance

– Exercise in self-affirmation can serve to boost test and school performance

Test-Taker’s Expectations

Are aptitude tests biased:

Yes – in terms of sensitivity to

performance differences caused by cultural

experiences

– No – in the scientific sense of making valid statistical

predictions for different

(51)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Test-Taker’s Expectations

Are aptitude tests

discriminatory?

Yes – their purpose IS to

discriminate – to distinguish among individuals

– No – they serve to reduce discrimination based on simply hiring the “right kind of person” or “who you

know”

Keep in Mind

• 1) Aptitude tests help

determine who might profit from intervention

2) Remain alert to not

misinterpret a test score as a literal meaning of personal worth or potential

3) The competence that general intelligence tests sample is

(52)

UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE

Keep in Mind

4) Intelligence tests don’t

account for abilities, talent, commitment, creativity, or character – all of which are important in determining who we are as individuals!

References

Related documents

• The down payment assistance usually is provided in the form of a second lien placed against the qualifying property for a set period of time. • May require a home buying

[r]

Some students may be shy, unwilling, or unable to answer openly, but they are more willing to respond anonymously via student response systems, which will increase the

Some other examples are University of Brighton Academies Trust; Birmingham City University Academics Trust (BCUAT); Staffordshire University Academies Trust;

Upon approval of the division and racing commission, a casino and a racetrack in this State may enter into an agreement to jointly operate a sports pool at the racetrack,

Line 2-14 compare to line 17, the effect of overexpression of YbeY (with plasmid ybeY annotated as pybeY, line 17) on ybeX deletion mutant strain is shown in comparison with

The optimal size for the shared mem- ory block when using 55-point stencils is hard to formulate, but with a numerical test we found that when τx = τy = τz = 8 and R = 3 we

Considerando la importancia que tiene el viento sobre los procesos físicos, químicos y biológicos que ocurren en las capas superficial y sub-superficial del mar,