UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Three Recent Controversies
• Memory War
– Are traumatic experiences repressed and later recovered with benefit?
• Gender War
– To what extent do nature and nurture shape our behaviors as men and women?
• Intelligence War
– Do we have an inborn general mental capacity, and if so, how do we quantify it into a
meaningful number?
What Is Intelligence?
• Experts agree that
intelligence is a concept and not a thing.
– Reification – reasoning error
that views an abstract, immaterial concept as if it were a concrete thing.
• Wrong to say “She has an IQ
of 120”
• Right to say “She once
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
What Is Intelligence?
• Intelligence – mental quality
consisting of the ability to learn from experience, solve problems, and use knowledge to adapt to new situations
– It is a socially constructed concept: cultures deem
intelligence whatever enables success in those cultures.
– Historically it has meant “school
smarts”
General or Specific Abilities?
• General Intelligence (g) – a
general intelligence factor that , according to Charles Spearman (1863-1945) and others, underlies specific mental abilities and is therefore measured by every task on an
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
General or Specific Abilities?
• Factor Analysis – a
statistical procedure that identifies clusters of related items (called factors) on a test; used to identify
different dimensions of
performance that underlie a person’s total score.
– Spearman helped develop
General or Specific Abilities?
• Factor Analysis (cont’d)
– Spearman noted that those
who score high in one area such as verbal intelligence, typically score higher than average in other areas, such as spatial or reasoning ability.
– Said a common skill set ( the “g” factor) underlies all
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
General or Specific Abilities?
• L.L. Thurstone (1887-1955)
– tested people using 55
different tests, and came up with 7 clusters of primary mental abilities: (listed)
• Conclusion – those who
excelled in one of these areas generally excelled in other areas (evidence of a g
factor)
General or Specific Abilities?
• 1)word fluency
• 2) verbal comprehension • 3)spatial ability
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
General or Specific Abilities?
• Like an athlete who may have
a skill set to perform well at many athletic tasks, so too might we have a mental skill set to perform well at many mental tasks.
• Kanazawa – asserts that g
scores do correlate with
academic situations, but not with evolutionary situations (page 406)
Theories of Multiple Intelligences
• Howard Gardner (1983,
2006) – views intelligence as multiple abilities that come in packages.
• Savant syndrome – a
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Theories of Multiple Intelligences
• 4 in 5 savants are males • Many savants also have
autism, a developmental disorder
– Kim Peek – memory whiz who inspired movie Rain Man
• Has memorized over 9000
books and can give detailed driving directions within any U.S. city
• Cannot button own clothes
Theories of Multiple Intelligences
• Savant example: Stephen
Wiltshire takes 30 minute helicopter ride and a visit to top of skyscraper, he
accurately drew the Tokyo skyline in 7 days.
• Gardner: we do not have
an intelligence, but rather
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Gardner’s Eight Intelligences
• Linguistic
• Logical-Mathematical • Musical
• Spatial
• Bodily-Kinesthetic • Intrapersonal (self) • Interpersonal (others) • Naturalist
Intelligence
• “g matters” – intelligence
scores that predicted graduate school success also predicted later job success.
• Recipe for success
combines talent with grit: highly successful people are conscientious,
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
10-Year Rule
• Anders Ericsson reports a
10-year rule: for expert performance in chess,
dancing, sports, computer programming, music, and medicine (virtually all
categories), it takes 10 years of intense, daily practice.
Sternberg’s 3 Intelligences
• Robert Sternberg (1985,
1999, 2003) agrees with Gardner that there is more than traditional general intelligence, but he
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Sternberg’s 3 Intelligences
• Analytical (academic
problem-solving) Intelligence
– Well-defined problems having
a single right answer
• Creative Intelligence
– Reacting adaptively to novel
situations and generating novel ideas
• Practical Intelligence
– Required for everyday tasks
Sternberg and Wagner
• Have “recently” developed
new tests of creativity and practical thinking
– Prove to be a more accurate
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Bill Gates Quote:
• “You have to be careful, if you’re
good at something, to make sure you don’t think you’re good at other things that you aren’t
necessarily so good at…Because I’ve been very successful at
(software development) people come in and expect that I have wisdom about topics that I don’t.”
– Bill Gates (1998)
Intelligence Theories Review
• Check out Table 10.2 on page 410
of text.
• Spearman
– General intelligence
• Thurstone
– Primary mental abilities
• Gardner
– 8 multiple intelligences
• Sternberg
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Intelligence & Creativity
• Creativity – the ability to
produce novel and valuable ideas
– A certain level of aptitude
(score of 120 on a standard intelligence test) is necessary but not sufficient for
creativity.
– Exceptionally creative people
usually score no higher than peers on intelligence tests.
Intelligence & Creativity
• Convergent thinking
– Intelligence tests that require a single correct answer
• Divergent thinking
– Creativity tests like “How many
uses can you think of for a brick?” • Injuries to…
– Left Parietal Lobe – damages
convergent thinking
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Intelligence & Creativity
• Sternberg’s 5 Components to Creativity:
– Expertise
• A well-developed knowledge base
– Imaginative thinking skills
• Ability to see things in novel ways, to recognize patterns, to make connections
– A venturesome personality
• Seeks new experiences, tolerates ambiguity and risk, perseveres in overcoming obstacles
Intelligence & Creativity
– Intrinsic motivation • Being driven more by
interest, satisfaction, and challenge than by external pressures
– A creative environment
• Sparks, supports, and refines
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Emotional Intelligence
• Social Intelligence – the
know-how involved in comprehending social situations and managing oneself successfully.
• Emotional Intelligence – the
ability to perceive,
understand, manage, and use emotions.
Emotional Intelligence
• Perceive
– Recognize in faces, music, stories • Understand
– Predict them and how they
change and blend
• Manage
– Know how to express them in
varied situations
• Use
– Enable adaptive or creative
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Emotional Intelligence
• Those scoring high in
emotional intelligence:
– Enjoy higher-quality
interactions with friends
– Exhibit modestly better job performance
– Can delay gratification in
pursuit of long-range rewards
– Are emotionally in tune with
others
Brain Size and Complexity
• There is a +.33 correlation
between brain size and intelligence scores
– Does not always prove true
• Einstein’s brain was 15%
larger in the parietal lobe’s lower region – which is a center for processing
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Brain Size and Complexity
• “Experience alters the
brain”
– Rats raised in stimulating
environments developed thicker, heavier cortexes.
– Intelligence is due to the development of neural connections
– Highly educated people die with more synapses than less-educated people
Brain Size and Complexity
– Highly intelligent people
differ in their neural plasticity
• Cortex stays thin longer, allowing more plasticity until the age of 11 to 13
• Average intelligence kids’ cortex reaches peak
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Brain Size & Complexity
• Gray Matter = neural cell
bodies
• White Matter = axons and
dendrites
• Higher intelligence scores
were linked with more gray matter in brain areas
responsible for memory, attention, and language.
Brain Function
• As people contemplate
questions on intelligence test, a frontal lobe area just above the outer edge of the eyebrows becomes
especially active:
– In the left brain for verbal
questions
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Brain Function
• This location in the frontal
lobe may be a “global workspace for organizing and coordinating
information”
• Quick-wittedness
– Speed of perception
– Speed of neural processing of information
Brain Function
• Perceptual Speed
– Example: a stimulus is briefly
flashed, then masked. Those who perceive very quickly tend to score somewhat higher on intelligence tests
• Neurological Speed
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Brain Function
• Why do fast reactions on
simple tasks predict intelligence?
– May reflect core information
processing ability
– Faster cognitive processing may allow more information to be acquired
Assessing Intelligence
• Francis Galton (1822-1911)
– cousin of Charles Darwin; did an assessment of
“intellectual strengths” at the 1884 London Exposition
– Tried to measure reaction
time, sensory acuity, muscular power, body proportions
– An attempt at a simple
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Assessing Intelligence
• Early 20th century, France
passed law requiring all children attend school.
– Alfred Binet (1857-1911) was
hired to study how to objectively identify
individuals with special needs
Assessing Intelligence
• Mental Age – a measure of
intelligence test
performance devised by
Binet; the chronological age that most typically
corresponds to a given level of performance. Thus, a
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Assessing Intelligence
• Binet’s intelligence test had
a single practical purpose: to identify French
schoolchildren needing
special attention; he feared his test would be used to label children and limit their opportunities.
Assessing Intelligence
• Lewis Terman (1877-1956) –
a professor at Stanford
University, he modified
Binet’s test of French children to fit California school children; it came to be called the
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Assessing Intelligence
• William Stern – German
psychologist who developed the famous intelligence
quotient (IQ):
• IQ = mental age /
chronological age x 100
Assessing Intelligence
• An average child whose
mental and chronological ages are the same has an IQ of 100.
• IQ formula works well for
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Assessing Intelligence
• Today intelligence tests no
longer compute IQ, but compare the test taker’s performance relative to the average performance of
others the same age.
• 2/3 of all test-takers fall
between 85 and 115, with an average still being 100
Assessing Intelligence
• U.S. government used
Terman’s test to screen incoming immigrants and WWI army recruits, the first mass administration of test
• As a result, 1924 immigration
law reduced quotas for Southern and Eastern
Europeans to less than 1/5 that for Northern and
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Assessing Intelligence
• Intelligence tests not only
predicted innate mental abilities, but also education and familiarity with the
culture assumed by the
test. (The tests were biased)
Modern Tests of Mental Abilities
• Achievement tests – a test
designed to assess what a person has learned.
• Aptitude tests – a test
designed to predict a person’s future
performance; aptitude is the capacity to learn.
– Most tests measure both
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Modern Tests of Mental Abilities
• Wechsler Adult Intelligence
Scale (WAIS) – the WAIS is the most widely used
intelligence test; contains verbal and performance (nonverbal) subtests.
• Wechsler Intelligence Scale
for Children (WISC) – a version for school-age children
Principles of Test Construction
• To be widely accepted,
psychological tests must be:
– Standardized
– Reliable – Valid
• Standardization – defining
meaningful scores by comparison with the
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Principles of Test Construction
• Normal Curve – the
symmetrical bell-shaped curve that describes the distribution of many
physical and psychological attributes. Most scores fall near the average, and fewer and fewer scores lie near the extremes.
Principles of Test Construction
• To keep the average scores
near 100, both the Stanford-Binet and Wechsler scales are
periodically restandardized.
• Flynn Effect – the general
effect that overall
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Reliability
• Reliability – the extent to
which a test yields consistent results, as
assessed by the consistency of scores on two halves of the test, or on retesting
– When retested, people’s
scores generally match their first score closely on both the WISC and WAIS, therefore they are reliable
Validity
• Validity – the extent to which
a test measures or predicts what it is supposed to.
– Content Validity – the extent to
which a test samples the behavior that is of interest
– Predictive Validity – the success
with which a test predicts the behavior it is designed to
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Validity
• The predictive power of
aptitude scores diminishes as students move up the educational ladder.
– If a university takes only those
applicants with very high aptitude scores, those scores cannot possibly predict much.
– When used with a restricted
range of people, the test loses predictive validity.
Dynamics of Intelligence
• Stability or Change
throughout life?
– Prior to age 3, characteristics
of infants only modestly predict children’s future aptitudes
– By age 4, children’s
performance on intelligence tests begins to predict their adolescent and adult scores
– High scoring adolescents tend
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Dynamics of Intelligence
• Intelligence tests given to
5-year olds do predict school achievement
• By age 7, intelligence test
scores stabilize, and consistency of scores increases with age
• Consistency of scores by
late adolescence on GRE and SAT tests are high
Dynamics of Intelligence
• Scotland tested all 10 ½ to
11 ½ -year olds in 1932
• Scotland then tested 542
survivors of that group near the year 2000, as 80-year olds
• Their findings were
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Dynamics of Intelligence
• Scottish study continued:
• High-scoring 11-year olds:
– More likely to be living
independently as 70-year olds
– Less likely to have suffered
late-onset Alzheimer’s disease
• High/Low scores at 11-years:
– Of girls scoring in top 25%, 70% were still living
– Of girls scoring in bottom 25%,
only 45% were still living
Dynamics of Intelligence
• A study of Nuns showed
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Extremes of Intelligence
• Low Extreme
• Mental Retardation –
(intellectual disability) a condition of limited mental ability, indicated by an
intelligence score of 70 or below and difficulty
adapting to the demands of life; varies from mild to
profound
Extremes of Intelligence
• Effects 1% of population • Males outnumber females
by 50%
• Down syndrome – a
condition of retardation and associated physical
disorders caused by an
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Dynamics of Intelligence
• Treatment of Individuals:
– Until mid-19th century, cared for at home (agricultural)
– During early-mid 20th century, residential schools became warehouses for the low extreme, giving residents little attention, no privacy, and no hope
• Parents advised to separate from their children prior to developing an attachment
Dynamics of Intelligence
– Late 20th century, encouraged to live as normal as possible within mainstream society
• Group homes helped
provide a protective living arrangement
– With restandardization of tests due to Flynn effect, those who border a score of 70 may qualify or not
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Dynamics of Intelligence
• Those qualifying as being
mentally retarded:
– Become eligible for special
education
– Receive Social Security payments for those with a mental disability
Dynamics of Intelligence
• Degrees of Mental
Retardation (and IQ scores):
– Mild (50-70)
– Moderate (35-50)
– Severe (20-35)
– Profound (Below 20)
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Dynamics of Intelligence
• In 2002 the U.S. Supreme
Court ruled that the
execution of people with mental retardation is “cruel and unusual punishment”
– U.S. is one of only a few
countries still having a “death penalty”
Dynamics of Intelligence
• High Extreme: • “Children with
extraordinary academic gifts are sometimes more isolated, introverted, and in their own worlds, but most thrive.”
• Most are healthy,
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Dynamics of Intelligence
• “Gifted Child” programs
– Tracking aptitude sometimes
creates a self-fulfilling prophecy
– May serve to widen the achievement gap between ability groups, and increase social isolation between them
– Minority and low-income youth are more often placed in lower academic groups
Dynamics of Intelligence
• Children have different
gifts:
– Math, verbal, art, social
leadership, etc.
• By providing appropriate
developmental placement suited to each child’s
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Genetic & Environmental Influences on Intelligence
• People who share the same
genes (family members) also share comparable mental abilities
• Intelligence test scores of
identical twins appear as though same individual was tested twice
Genetic & Environmental Influences on Intelligence
• Identical twins have very
similar gray matter (neural cell body) volume,
especially in areas linked to verbal and spatial
intelligence
• Intelligence is
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Genetic & Environmental Influences on Intelligence
• Adopted children
– Mental similarities between
adopted children and their adoptive parents wane with age, until correlation hits zero
– Adopted children’s scores over time become more like those of their biological
parents
Genetic & Environmental Influences on Intelligence
•
The most
genetically similar
people have the
most similar
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Heritability
• Heritability: the proportion
of variation among
individuals that we can attribute to genes (Unit 4)
– Never pertains to an individual – only to why people differ from one another
– For intelligence it is about
50%
Heritability
• “In a world of clones,
heritability would be zero.”
• “Heritability of boys raised
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Heritability
• Environment enhances
performance:
– If you have a natural aptitude
for academics, you will be more likely to stay in school, read books, and ask questions – all of which will amplify
your cognitive brain power.
Environmental Influences
• Severe deprivation does
leave footprints on the brain
– Romanian and Iranian
orphanages observe children who cannot sit up unassisted at age 2 or walk at age 4
– Extreme deprivation was
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Environmental Influences
– Language-fostering games
significantly helped orphans
– Among the poor,
environmental conditions can override genetic differences, depressing cognitive
development
• Less-qualified teachers • Malnutrition
• Sensory Deprivation • Social Isolation
Environmental Influences
• Can parents “fast-forward”
a normal infant into genius?
– All babies should have normal
exposure to sights, sounds, and speech
– Evidence shows there is little to be gained by extreme
efforts to enhance early intelligence
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Schooling and Intelligence
• Schooling and intelligence
both enhance later income
• Project Head Start (1965)
– U.S. Government-funded
preschool program
– Mostly for families below poverty level
Schooling and Intelligence
• Quality programs help:
– Offer individual attention – Increase children’s school
readiness
– Decreases likelihood of
repeating a grade
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Schooling and Intelligence
• What we accomplish also
depends on our beliefs and motivation:
– Those with a “growth
mindset” see intelligence as something that can be
modified, and are usually more successful
– Those with a “fixed mindset”
tend to be less successful
Group Differences in Intelligence Scores
• Our gender similarities far
outnumber our gender differences
– In terms of intelligence, the
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Gender Comparisons
• Females are somewhat
better than males at:
– Spelling
– Verbal fluency and remembering words
– Remembering and locating
objects
– Sensations of touch, taste, and odor
– Emotion detecting
Gender Comparisons
• Males and females are
nearly the same at:
– Math and spatial aptitudes • males are slightly better at
math problem solving
• females are slightly better at math computation
• In western cultures, more
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Gender Comparisons
• Males are more likely than
females to overestimate their own test scores
• Both males and females
rate scores of their:
– Father higher than mother
– Brother higher than sister
– Son higher than daughter
Gender Comparisons
• Gender score differences are
sharpest at the extremes
– Among 12- to 14-year olds
scoring extremely high on SAT math, boys outnumber girls 13:1
– Boys have an edge in AP
physics and computer science exams
– 99% of chess grandmasters are
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Gender Comparisons
• Steven Pinker (2005) sees
both biological and social influences
– Life priorities – Risk-taking
– Math reasoning
– Spatial abilities
Gender Comparisons
• Elizabeth Spelke (2005)
cautions that male/female comparisons are
oversimplified
– In gender-equal cultures of Iceland and Sweden, there is little gender gap in math
– Males are usually not tested
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Gender Comparisons
• Greater Male Variability
– Males mental ability scores
vary more than females
– Boys outnumber girls at both the low and high extremes
– More boys than girls are
found in special education programs
– Boys talk later
– Boys stutter more
Ethnic Similarities/Differences
• Racial groups differ in their
average intelligence scores
• High-scoring people (and
groups) are more likely to attain high levels of
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Ethnic Similarities/Differences
• Bell curve of intelligence
scores is centered for:
– Whites (IQ 100)
– American Blacks (IQ 85)
– Hispanics (IQ roughly 93)
*There are many exceptions to these numbers. They only represent a generalization of statistics.
Ethnic Similarities/Differences
• Ethnic differences are
evident in many other groups around the world, not simply in the U.S.
• Individual differences within
a race are much greater
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Ethnic Similarities/Differences
• Asian students outperform
North American students on math achievement and
aptitude tests
– Asian students also spend 30% more days per year attending school, and more time out of school studying math
Ethnic Similarities/Differences
• White and Black:
– Infants have scored equally well
on an infant intelligence measure
– Exhibit similar
information-processing skill
• Various ethnic groups have
experienced “golden ages”:
– Greeks, Egyptians, Romans,
Arabs, Aztecs, Asians, etc.
– Difficult to attribute natural
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Ethnic Similarities/Differences
• Black and Whites:
– High school environments
differ greatly in quality, and therefore the gap grows wider here
– College environments of comparable quality see the gap narrow greatly
The Question of Bias
• Two meanings of bias:
– A test that measures
performance differences caused by cultural
experiences and education
– A test that predicts future behavior only for some groups of test-takers (Ex. males or females )
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
The Question of Bias
• Near consensus among
psychologists is that major U.S. aptitude tests (ACT, SAT) are NOT biased.
Test-Taker’s Expectations
• Stereotype Threat – a
self-confirming concern that
one will be evaluated based on a negative stereotype
– Blacks scored higher when tested by Blacks rather than Whites
– Women have scored higher
when no male test-takers were in the group
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Test-Taker’s Expectations
– Women’s chess play drops
sharply when they think they are playing a male rather than a female
– Telling students they
probably won’t succeed at something serves to erode test and school performance
– Exercise in self-affirmation can serve to boost test and school performance
Test-Taker’s Expectations
• Are aptitude tests biased:
– Yes – in terms of sensitivity to
performance differences caused by cultural
experiences
– No – in the scientific sense of making valid statistical
predictions for different
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Test-Taker’s Expectations
• Are aptitude tests
discriminatory?
– Yes – their purpose IS to
discriminate – to distinguish among individuals
– No – they serve to reduce discrimination based on simply hiring the “right kind of person” or “who you
know”
Keep in Mind
• 1) Aptitude tests help
determine who might profit from intervention
• 2) Remain alert to not
misinterpret a test score as a literal meaning of personal worth or potential
• 3) The competence that general intelligence tests sample is
UNIT 10: INTELLIGENCE
Keep in Mind
• 4) Intelligence tests don’t
account for abilities, talent, commitment, creativity, or character – all of which are important in determining who we are as individuals!