• No results found

From GCL to E&O, With a Bit of D&O:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "From GCL to E&O, With a Bit of D&O:"

Copied!
29
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

From GCL to E&O, With a Bit of D&O:

Getting the Most Out of Your Insurance Coverage

David R. McDonald, Partner

Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP

50 California Street, 34thFloor

(2)

Outline

ƒ

CGL coverage (duty to defend, indemnify)

ƒ

Other sources of coverage

ƒ

Business Interruption Insurance

ƒ

Advertising Liability Insurance

ƒ

Director’s and Officer’s Liability Ins.

(3)

Definitions

ƒ

Type of Liability Coverage

ƒ First Party Liability (All Risk or Named Peril)

ƒ Third Party Liability (CGL)

ƒ Environmental Impairment Liability (EIL)

ƒ

Level of Coverage

ƒ Primary

ƒ Excess

(4)

Definitions

(continued)

ƒ

Direct insurance vs. reinsurance

(5)
(6)

Insuring Agreements

ƒ

Duty to Indemnify—

ƒ Defines scope of coverage

ƒ Specified limits

ƒ

Duty to Defend—

ƒ Defines scope of defense obligation

(7)

Duty to Indemnify

ƒ

Insurer must pay "all sums that the insured is

legally obligated to pay as damages because of

an occurrence."

(8)

Duty to Indemnify Issues

ƒ

Requires “legal” obligation.

ƒ Requires lawsuit and potentially, court order to pay. Powerine

ƒ Recent case-- No coverage for post tender expense, settlements w/o insurer knowledge/consent.

“Voluntary payment.” Not applicable where insurer

wrongfully denies tender, abandons policyholder. (Low v. Golden Eagle, 110 Cal. App. 4th 1532).

(9)

Duty to Indemnify Issues

(continued)

ƒ

Requires Property Damage

ƒ Recent case-- No coverage for loss of computer data during upgrade as data not tangible/physical. Ward General Ins. v. Employers Fire Ins., (4th App. Dist.)

ƒ

Occurrence--act or event or series of like acts or

events during policy period

ƒ Number of occurrences

ƒ During policy period

(10)

Indemnity--Exclusions

ƒ

Intended or Expected Exclusion

ƒ Act vs. damage

ƒ “Common and accepted” practices

ƒ

No coverage for illegal acts (General Reinsurance

v. St. Jude Hospital 107 Cal. App. 4

th

1097)

ƒ Self insured employer improperly delayed paying claim for employee benefits. 10% penalty assessed.

(11)

Indemnity Exclusions

(continued)

ƒ

Owned Property Exclusion

ƒ Soil vs. groundwater

ƒ Threatened damage to groundwater versus actual damage

ƒ

Pollution Exclusion

ƒ Sudden and accidental

(12)

Duty to Defend

ƒ

State law governs

ƒ

Potentiality of coverage

ƒ

Determined at outset of underlying litigation

ƒ

Triggering Event—claim, administrative order

or lawsuit (Foster Gardner)

ƒ

Duty to provide complete defense

ƒ Some claims covered/others not (Buss)

(13)

Duty to Defend

(continued)

ƒ

Notice and tender to insurers

ƒ Recent case--Insured will lose coverage if policy requires insured to provide recorded statement and insured refuses to do so after request by insurer, (Brizuela v. CalFarm Ins. Co., 116 Cal App. 578).

(14)

Duty to Defend

(continued)

ƒ

Choice of underlying counsel

ƒ

Categories of expense that insurer must pay

ƒ Legal fees associated w/ defending underlying case

ƒ Legal expense

ƒ Investigatory expense (Aerojet)

(15)

Late Notice

ƒ Late Notice will preclude coverage under occurrence policies only if prejudice is shown to the carrier.

ƒ Generally this rule wouldn’t apply to claims made policies, however recent case holds that in certain cirmumstances an insurer will be equitably estopped from denying

coverage because a claim was submitted under a claims made policy after the policy period, (Root v. American Equity Specialty Ins. Co. 2005 Lexis 1005).

ƒ Caution: Case limited to facts – proper notice to carriers also advised

(16)

Insured’s Duty Not To Make

Misrepresentations on

Coverage Application

ƒ

Ins. Code 331 & 359

-ƒ Heavy burden of disclosures

ƒ Parties must disclose in good faith all facts within

his/her knowledge which are or which he/she believes to be material to the contract

ƒ

Extends to both intentional and unintentional

misrepresentations, recent case

--Mitchell v. United National Ins. Co., 127 Cal. App. 4th 457 (2005)

(17)

Missing Policies

ƒ

In most jurisdictions, not need actual

policy

ƒ

Where reasonably diligent search not

locate policy, secondary evidence

admissible

ƒ

Oral testimony of brokers and employees

admissible.

(Dart Industries 29 Cal 4th1059

(18)

Other Sources of Coverage

ƒ

Policies bought by others (e.g., “Additional

Insured” certificates)

ƒ Recent cases:

ƒ “Minimal causal connection” required for general to obtain coverage under subcontractor’s policy.

Vitton v. Pacific Ins.

ƒ Landlord’s coverage excess to tenant’s coverage.

(19)

Other Sources of Coverage

(continued)

ƒ

Policies obtained through corporate acquisitions

ƒ Recent cases—no coverage for successor corporation

(Henkel v. Hartford 29 Cal 4th 934)

ƒ Henkel buys Amchem’s product line along with all

related liabilities. Insurance not cover Henkel’s losses for bodily injuries caused by Amchem products.

(20)

Other Sources of Coverage

(continued)

ƒ

Henkel

(continued)

ƒ Henkel liabilities caused by contract.

ƒ Not satisfy exceptions: (1) transaction is consolidation, merger or continuation, (2) acquisition of business

destroys plaintiffs’ remedies against original

manufacturer, (3) no statutory imposed successor liability.

ƒ Assignment requires insurer’s consent (not to be unreasonably withheld).

(21)

Business Interruption

ƒ

Arson (or terrorism) causing fire (or other damage)

on site

ƒ Business interruption requirements

ƒ Named peril

ƒ Directly caused property damage at covered location

ƒ Interrupted business

(22)

Advertising Injury Coverage

ƒ

Insured must have engaged in “advertising”

ƒ

Underlying action must involve enumerated

“advertising” offense

ƒ Currently include defamation, invasion of privacy, disparagement of another’s good’s products or

services, misappropriation of advertising ideas or style of doing business, rights of privacy.

ƒ Not include unfair business competition claims (Bank of the West)

(23)

Advertising Injury

(continued)

ƒ

Recent cases--Requires wide spread promotion

to public—direct solicitation insufficient.

Rombe Corp. v. Allied Ins. Co. 128 Cal. App. 4th 482

(24)

Director’s and Officer’s

Coverage

ƒ

Types of coverage

ƒ Corporate reimbursement coverage

ƒ Individual D + O liability coverage

ƒ

Sued solely because an officer or director of

corporation (or where acts are inseparable)

ƒ

Discharging duties to corporation when

actionable conduct arose

(25)

Cost-Effective Management of

Coverage Litigation

ƒ

At outset, game plan for litigation w/ budget.

Make decisions re probability of various

approaches.

ƒ

Periodic meetings w/ outside counsel re status,

alternative approaches to case handling.

ƒ

Outsourcing where possible.

(26)

Settlement: When and How

ƒ

Various times for settlement:

ƒ After notice; before coverage lawsuit

ƒ After suit filed but before discovery begins

ƒ While key motions pending

ƒ During expert discovery

ƒ During trial

ƒ

Considerations

ƒ Settle defense, indemnity or both

(27)

Severability

Application Exclusions

Policy Rescission Size of D&O Tower

Side A, B and C and Side A Towers

Conduct Exclusions

“In Fact” versus “Final Adjudication”

Continuity

Issues with Moving Coverage

Excess Layers

Follow Form Language

(28)

Lead Plaintiff

Type of

Case Damage

Amount Settlement Value

SEC

(29)

References

Related documents

An insured or an assignee may recover extra-contractual damages from an insurer if the insurer fails or refuses to settle a claim within the liability policy limits, the

Insured persons have a duty to notify the organizational unit of the insurer indicated on the insurance policy of all changes in personal circumstances that may affect the

• Reduce irrigation management time • Web based system operational alerts (ex. no-flow, low pressure etc.) are sent to e-mail and cellphone • Simple and easy remote access

protected as required by Rule 1.6. In situations where there are apparent conflicts or potential conflicts of interests between the insurer and the insured, and the insurer is

From the results of pathogenicity test showed the fourth local isolates of entomopathogenic fungi can cause insect mortality test on the second day until the

The Insurer will indemnify the Insured from the Policy Date during the Period of Insurance against Insured Losses sustained by the Insured as a result of the items listed in What

We hereby inform you that we may use your contact details, demographic information and policy details to contact you with direct marketing communications regarding financial

Texas supreme court determined, take the insured coverage in the additional umbrella policy as the excess liability, shift the coverage is less than its tools to.. WHO QUALIFIES AS