• No results found

POST ACA REVENUE CYCLE TRANSFORMATION

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "POST ACA REVENUE CYCLE TRANSFORMATION"

Copied!
28
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

POST ACA

REVENUE CYCLE

TRANSFORMATION

(2)

• Intro

• Revenue cycle features

• ACA impact areas

• What did we expect?

• UDS and PMG data analytics

• Top “to-do” items

• Summary

(3)

• Encounters with DOS post 10/1/2015 need to use ICD 10 Codes

• Largest change in coding in 20+ years

• Potential of significant cash flow issues

• Daily update suggested from billing - # Denials

• Significantly more time needed to fight denials

* Caresource Medicaid (OH) paid 29,674 FQHC claims & 11 ICD10

denials. Medicare Intermediary in OH paid 2,340+ ICD 10 claims

(4)

• Demographics

• Charge Entry

• Transmit Claims

– Patient Statements

• Post Payments

Revenue Cycle Features

ALL MISSION CRITICAL ACTIVITIES PRE- AND POST-ACA!!

• Manage Denials

• Unpaids & Appeals

• General Management

• Close & Reporting

(5)

• Decrease in self-pay volume

• Increase in Medicaid enrollees

– Medicaid represents 64.3% (2013) & 66.9% (2014) of total payments

• Elevated “blended encounter rate” – CHCs make more money

• Expanded healthcare exchanges

• RCM/Billing staff feeling more burdened

• Over-burdened outcome: – Elevated AR

– Lower performance around KPI

(6)

CY13 vs. CY14

• Mix of insured vs. uninsured

Uninsured decrease, -7% (7.6M to 6.4M) – Insured increase, +7% (14.1M to 16.5M)

• Patient visit volume

– Increase, +5.3% (+21.7M to 22.9M)

**Possible $100+ per visit swing from slide patient vs. Medicaid

UDS Data - Insurance & Visits

Source: Geiger Gibson & RCHN Community Health Foundation Research Collaborative; Policy Research Brief # 42

(7)

Source: Geiger Gibson & RCHN Community Health Foundation Research Collaborative; Policy Research Brief # 42

(8)

Source: Geiger Gibson & RCHN Community Health Foundation Research Collaborative; Policy Research Brief # 42

(9)

Source: Geiger Gibson & RCHN Community Health Foundation Research Collaborative; Policy Research Brief # 42

(10)

Source: www.bphc.gov

UDS Data – National 2012

47% 9% 4% 13% 27% 2012 National Charges medicaid medicare public private self pay 64% 10% 4% 12% 10% 2012 National Payments medicaid medicare public private self pay

(11)

UDS Data – AK 2012

Source: www.bphc.gov 34% 13% 1% 26% 26% 2012 AK Charges medicaid medicare public private self pay 51% 12% 1% 26% 10% 2012 AK Payments medicaid medicare public private self pay

(12)

UDS Data – 2014 National

Source: www.bphc.gov 47% 10% 4% 13% 26% 2014 National Charges medicaid medicare public private self pay 64% 10% 4% 12% 10% 2014 National Payments medicaid medicare public private self pay

(13)

UDS Data – 2014 AK

Source: www.bphc.gov 34% 13% 1% 24% 28% AK 2014 Charges medicaid medicare public private self pay 51% 11% 1% 26% 11% AK 2014 Payments medicaid medicare public private self pay

(14)

– Trends

• Less self pay in 2014, should continue in 2015

• More insurance visits – higher reimbursement per encounter

• Splintering of payer mix - Credentialing/enrollment needs

• Additional patient visits in 2014, right size billing staff

• Increase in self pay/slide payment per encounter

(15)

• AK Expanded Medicaid – effect for FQHCs

• 20 states, no state expansion program

• 28% still uninsured (indefinite?)

• Data integrity, suspect

• Sustainable trend?

• Premium payments continued?

UDS Data – Thoughts II

Source: Geiger Gibson & RCHN Community Health Foundation Research Collaborative; Policy Research Brief # 42

(16)

• Average payment per visit/encounter

• How to calculate:

Blended Encounter Rate - What is it?

Total Payments ÷ Total Visits* = Blended Encounter Rate

vs. (different than knowing) Medicaid or Medicare Rate

(17)

• Average payment per visit/encounter • How to calculate:

– 2012 National UDS 5 Line 34 (Grand Total Visits) 83,766,153* – 2012 National UDS 9D Line 14 B Collection $9,024,236,793* – 2012 National Blended Encounter Rate: $107.73/visit*

– 2012 AK UDS 5 Line 34 (Grand Total Visits) 515,046** – 2012 AK UDS 9D Line 14 Collection $80,042,598** – 2012 AK Blended Encounter Rate: $155.41/visit**

Blended Encounter Rate

2012 UDS Data.. Pre-ACA

* http://bphc.hrsa.gov/uds/datacenter.aspx?q=tall&year=2012&state= **http://bphc.hrsa.gov/uds/datacenter.aspx?q=tall&year=2012&state=AK

Alaska Only…

(18)

• Average payment per visit/encounter • How to calculate:

– 2014 National UDS 5 Line 34 (Grand Total Visits) 90,379,441* – 2014 National UDS 9D Line 14 B Collection $11,416,470,097* – 2014 National Blended Encounter Rate: $126.32/visit*

– 2014 AK UDS 5 Line 34 (Grand Total Visits) 537,310** – 2014 AK UDS 9D Line 14 Collection $97,682,138** – 2014 AK Blended Encounter Rate: $181.79/visit**

Blended Encounter Rate

2014 UDS Data: Post-ACA

* http://bphc.hrsa.gov/uds/datacenter.aspx?q=tall&year=2014&state= **http://bphc.hrsa.gov/uds/datacenter.aspx?q=tall&year=2014&state=AK

Alaska Only…

(19)

• Average payment per visit/encounter

• Average AK community health center reimbursement per encounter

• 2012 $ 155.41

• 2014 $ 181.79

$ 26.38

(20)
(21)

UDS Data: Payer Mix Shift 2014

Uninsured Delta: -7.57% (Decrease) Medicaid Delta: +8.16% (Increase)

(22)

• RCM = Revenue Cycle Management

• Get paid as much as able on first claim submission

– Clean Claim

• Get paid as much as you are able (legally entitled) when you can, so

you can give it away when you want to

• RCM Expert??? – CFO – Billing Manager – Outside Firm

Post-ACA RCM Focus

Item #1…

Billing 101

(23)

• Expense as percent of payments: < 9% • Cost per claim: < $8

• Electronic claim transmission: 90%+ • Clearinghouse utilization: Yes

• Certified staff: At least one

• RVU/Medicare based charges: Yes • < 30 DAR

• ICD 10 denials reported and fixed • AR over 90 Days, < 20%

• Net AR: As close to $0 as possible

Post ACA RCM Focus

(24)

• Medicaid encounter rate rocks

• Took ACA $ or not… get patients enrolled

• Expand Medicaid patient base

• Teach all staff to recognize opportunity to enroll

• Volunteer staff focus on outreach

• Room on CHC website explaining:

– Plan options with benefit detail in plain language – Open enrollment deadlines

Post-ACA RCM Focus

Item #3…

Enrollment

(25)

• “Battle is won or lost at the front desk.”

• Eligibility… check every patient every time

– Check every patient every time

– 15-20% of ACA beneficiaries, no premium paid

• TOS payment

– SFS… Slide deductibles and copayments

– No insurance verified… pay cash (NO EXCEPTION)

• Start “Triangle of Communication” with regular meetings

– RCM (Billing) to Front Desk to Providers

Post-ACA RCM Focus

(26)

• Share understandable data

• Picture worth a 1,000 words

• Again, “Triangle of Communication”

• Who are in-house experts & accountable??

– Target charges/payments…. CFO

– Acceptable denials… Billing Manager – System optimization… IT Lead

– Provider productivity… Medical Director (other?)

Post ACA CHC Focus

(27)

Post ACA CHC Focus

(28)

• USE RCM Data Analytics – Look for trends

• ICD 10 – Review and plan of attack

• Regular and persistent review

• Defined/Targeted performance expectations

• Control what is controllable

• Hold people accountable

References

Related documents

Over the years I developed a rule: if her boyfriend doesn't show up, right there, I treat her as a single woman, period. I have slept with many girls who gave me the boyfriend

We proposed in this chapter a graph clustering procedure DENGRAPH-IO to detect communities in large noisy data sets and introduced incremental update functions to efficiently

Simple for how to register free invoice template, purchase of our free makeup or services rendered or individual billing software if you to the table.. May not happy to

The proposed methods mainly focused on various optimization algo- rithms, but also on support techniques, including methods for circumventing the time consuming numer- ical

Adjusted proportions of length of hospital stay (LoS) &gt; early discharge (ED) for spontaneous vaginal deliveries (SVD; ED = 2 days) and instrumental vaginal deliveries (IVD; ED

evaluation was with respect to references that were small fractions of the size of the effort required by the RFP and the Air Force’s reliance on other past performance

We apply the model to three current policy issues: (1) the desirability of currency basket pegs in East Asia, (2) the anticipated effects of China’s currency policy reform, and

Our first research question is: ”is it possible to derive a construction such that when the quantization method is chosen we know beforehand what the effects on robustness, key