Corporate Intranet/Extranet
Corporate
Intranet/Extranet
Ten years ago, the Web was exciting to people.
Today it’s routine It’s a tool Today, it s routine. It s a tool. If it’s convenient, they will use it;
If not they won’t If not, they won t.
The IFRC in brief
• The IFRC is part of the RCRC Movement with ICRC and NS.
• History: The RCRC was created on the Battle of Solferino in
The
IFRC
in
brief
History: The RCRC was created on the Battle of Solferino in
1859. In 1919 the IFRC was created.
• Membership organization: 187 National Societies with 100
million of volunteers million of volunteers.
• Global Impact: 200 million people assisted every year
• Locations: Geneva HQs, 5 Zone offices, 2 Delegation offices
• Areas of activity: Health, Disaster Response, Capacity of
What
is
FedNet?
• FedNet is the IFRC extranet
at s ed et?
• Launched in 2003
• Available in four languages: EN, FR, SP, AR • Access given to anyone in Movement
• Password protected with secure access • Managed by Communications Dept.
Agenda
• Analysis: Problems, Objectives, Solutions
• Successes
• Current Initiatives
• The Future
• Audience Contribution • Audience Contribution
Analysis:
Problems
• User perspective: Unfamiliar Information
Architecture (IA),( ), Non‐functional search,, Singleg
language
• Editor perspective: Challenging content
management system (CMS) Not my job De management system (CMS), Not my job, De‐
prioritization due to staff turnover
• Management perspective:Management perspective: Poor projectPoor project
management, Inconsistent technical
expectations, Insufficient human resource
allocation allocation
Problem: unfamiliar navigation
• Resources: tools, guidelines, events, training
• Activities:Activities: programmatic areas such asprogrammatic areas, such as
health and disaster management
• Zones
• Zones
• Working Together: partnership and strategy
Problem:
•Too muchManagement
•Too much information •Little Strategic •Little Strategic prioritization•No “above the fold” –No above the fold
• ObjectivesObjectives
– Local access to global information in a simple way Communication interchange: A growing range of
– Communication interchange: A growing range of
tools to exchange knowledge
– Fully engaged content management team –
– Fully engaged content management team –
improving effectiveness & reducing costs
– Promote organizationPromote organization wide:‐wide: Working together as a Working together as a
• SolutionsSolutions
– User survey to identify priorities
Align technical expectations with resources
– Align technical expectations with resources
– Redefine FedNet team
I l t St t i Pl
– Implement Strategic Plan
– Improve communication with stakeholders
I li i h h i
Information Architecture
Solutions
Information Architecture
•Better “above the fold” presentation
•Information architecture consistent with
user expectations
Stakeholder Communication •Editor engagement
•Language representation
•Alignment with partner properties
Technical Integration
•Common platform with Public Web Site
•CMS: EpiServer
•Social media tools: Relate+ add‐on of
E iS EpiServer
•Integration with SharePoint for
collaboration spaces
•Single sign‐on with Active Directory and
Successes
• Same platform for public site, intranet, management
application
B tt “ b th f ld” t ti
• Better “above the fold” presentation
• Information architecture consistent with user
expectations expectations
• Accessible in any browser and via mobile application • Editor engagementg g
“ f l ”
Successes
•“I forgot my laptop” – everything current,
available on FedNet
l bl d
•Solves problems and
improves efficiency
•Collaboration Spaces:
ki h
working together: smarter
and greener
•Knowledge Expansion tool
f N i l S i i for National Societies
•Communications Channel
Usability
in
a
decentralized
editorial
model
• About 150 FedNet editors in the IFRC
• Responsible for the contents in their own • Responsible for the contents in their own
sections
R d l t th ti
Risks
in
a
decentralized
model
• 150 editors with various skills could create amess
• Variety in the quality of contents and visual
elements:
bad language, poor quality of photos and
graphical elements g p
• Variety in the amount and quality of contents
between sections between sections
Importance
of
the
structure
• Site structure should be clear also for theeditors,, so that theyy can understand their role
and responsibilities in FedNet
• FedNet structure has 4 main sections withFedNet structure has 4 main sections, with
colour codes
• Limited editor access helps to maintain the
• Limited editor access helps to maintain the
CMS
and
templates
should
be
easy
to
use
• With simple technology editors can concentrate
to contents
• With simple technology it’s easier to create
simple pages
• Only very limited possibilities to visualize the text • Minimise the risks:
– If pages or files are renamed or moved, the links will still work
– Informative warnings when deleting pages or files
Training
provided
for
all
editors
• No access to CMS backend without training• Not only technical training; editors should
understand that they are part of the understand that they are part of the
communication process
• Basic usabilityy issues highlightedg g in the training:g ‐ Think what users need and are looking for
‐ Easy and informative navigation
‐ SimpleSimple language, following the IFRC style guide language, following the IFRC style guide
‐ Use highlight boxes and bulleted lists
‐ Remember to update pages and remove old pages
• Support and motivation after the training! • Support and motivation after the training!
Structure
Structure
The
Future
• Technology and user sophistication changing • Digital Divide very present for a worldwide • Digital Divide very present for a worldwide
organization
Wh i th t ti i t?
• Where is the saturation point?
Usability Must
Always Be
Focused
‐ Continuous engagement
on
the
User
g g
‐ Fresh and findable content
‐ Responsiveness to input: two wayResponsiveness to input: two way
conversation
‐ Technical innovation: litheness of use; smoothTechnical innovation: litheness of use; smooth
integration of new technology (LinkedIn,
di i i
Contact
• Mika Jouhki, Web Officer, Finnish Red Cross
Mika Jouhki@ifrc org [email protected]
• Catherine Kane, IFRC Senior Officer, Online
Internal Communications