• No results found

Cloud Security under Forthcoming Laws

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Cloud Security under Forthcoming Laws"

Copied!
29
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Cloud Security

under

Forthcoming Laws

Kuan Hon

[email protected]

@kuan∅

|

[email protected]

SecureCloud 2016

25 May 2016

(2)

@kuan∅

The laws, they are a-changin’…

Cloud security

under

• General Data

Protection Regulation

• Proposed Network &

Information Systems

Security Directive

(3)
(4)

@kuan∅

GDPR - recap

Aim: modernise & harmonise EU DP laws Now law; applies from 25 May 2018 Regulation, not Directive – directly effective 2 year lead / transition time Accountability focus, big fines

Security – changes for

both cloud customers &

(5)

@kuan∅

GDPR’s key changes affecting cloud

New processor

( cloud provider )

Obligations,

and

Liabilities

Expanded

requirements

when a controller

( cloud customer )

uses a processor

( cloud provider )

- Due diligence

- Contract terms

- Ensuring compliance

(6)

@kuan∅

Processor issues

New obligations on processors ( cloud providers )

- security, international transfers, record-keeping, DPO

Processor ( cloud provider ) liability

( >> security breach )

• Damage incl. non-financial – compensation if any contributory breach • Exempt if prove “not in any way responsible” for “event” giving rise to

the damage

• Recourse against others “involved” in same processing – if paid full compensation

• N.B. contractual allocation, indemnities ! • SCL article – older version of GDPR

(7)

@kuan∅

GDPR’s contract requirements

Many prescriptive provisions,

including

• Subject-matter, duration, nature, purpose, type, categories…

• Security & employee

confidentiality obligations

• Information / audit rights for controller

• “Assist” re. controller obligations ( nature of processing, info. ) • Security, breach notification,

DPIA, prior consultation

• Sub-processors – prior consent, notify changes; “flow down” • impossible except for biggest

cloud providers ?

Problem for

commoditised,

standardised

public cloud !

(8)

@kuan∅

Data Centre Provider(s) IaaS / PaaS Provider SaaS Provider

Cloud – many sub-processors

Connectivity Provider(s) ( carriers etc )

Cloud Customers

( or with IaaS / PaaS Provider direct )

(9)

@kuan∅

GDPR contracts – fine !

No

“grandfathering”

Fine 2% / €10m

for both

controller &

processor if

contract is

non-compliant

(10)

@kuan∅

Contracts - practical steps

Providers - change standard terms, from 25 May 2018 • More detailed allocation of obligations, liability; indemnities • Increase pricing;

extra charges for providing “assistance” etc. • ( Unlikely to agree to GDPR terms before 25 May 2018 - more onerous ) Customers - contracts expiring after 25 May

2018 ( if negotiable )

• Add change of law / change control term re.: • Comply with GDPR

requirements, who

bears costs of change • Responsibility &

liability allocation, indemnities; pricing / charges

• Start considering changes / negotiating position • NB. existing ( even

non-cloud ) contracts too

Commission / supervisory

authority may adopt standard terms

• CSA leadership role • draft & put forward

cloud-appropriate terms ?

(11)

@kuan∅

GDPR’s security requirements

Controllers & processors ( incl. cloud )

C I A, incl. encryption + resilience / bus. continuity

+ regularly test & evaluate effectiveness

Risk-based incl. state of art, costs + steps to prevent persons

with authorised access from processing except on controller’s

“instructions” ( or EU / Member State law )

Practical

impact –

apply

security

best

practices

NB. organisational measures – people,

processes

(12)

@kuan∅

Processors’ security obligations

How to ensure security

“appropriate” to individual

customers, in public cloud ?

Tiered services / rates

(13)

@kuan∅

Other GDPR changes re. cloud security

• Controller: 4% / €20m

• Processor: 2% / €10m

• ( + Compliance may help mitigate fines )

Fine for breach of

security

requirements

• CSA leadership role – propose CCM etc ?

Approved codes /

certifications – help

show compliance

• Controller

• To authority; individuals ( encryption )

• Processor to controller

“Personal data

breach” notification

(14)

@kuan∅

Largest ICO Fine v. Large UK FS co.’s revenues 2015

€20m = £15.3m €10m = £7.6m £0.0 m £20.0 m £40.0 m £60.0 m £80.0 m £100.0 m £120.0 m £140.0 m 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Revenues 2015 (%) €10m €20m 4% 2% Fine

(15)

@kuan∅

Implications for cloud

“Guaranteed”

security &

“strict”

liability vs

price ?

Costs to customise etc., vs public cloud

Risks –

infrastructure

providers

Raise prices; refuse services; close

EEA ops, free services; not use EEA DCs ? Impact on innovation / services to EEA citizens

Or will laws

be ignored ?

Enforceable,

fines..

Favouring

large

incumbents

over small

startups ?

Control / influence supply / contract chain, afford certifications

(16)

@kuan∅

Killing cloud quickly with DP ?

The GDPR's coming, soon to be law they say

Middle of 20-18 will be the fateful day !

What will this mean for clo-ud ?

Will cloud be here to sta-ay ?

Don't want to be pessimistic, not sure how we'll find a way

Killing cloud quickly with DP, killing cloud quickly, with DP

Tearing up SaaS, PaaS and I-aaS

Killing cloud quickly, with DP…?

Full article www.scl.org/site.aspx?i=ed46375

(17)

@kuan∅

Summary

Start now ! Fines will get

boardroom attention… Processors’ new obligations / liability

• Contracts for both – inventory, changes; liability allocation, indemnities, seek fault-based

• Cloud solutions ? CSA – standard clauses ?

Controllers & ( sub- ) processors

• Controllers - DP by design & default, incl. security; DPIAs, incl. security

Re-engineer systems / processes to comply, incl.

• CSA – certifications etc ?

Codes & certifications etc. - increased role

(18)

NETWORK & INFORMATION

SYSTEMS SECURITY DIRECTIVE

(19)

@kuan∅

Overview

Security &

incident

notification

obligations

Operators of

“essential

services”

+

“Digital service

providers”

All data, not

just personal

data

Supervision

Regulatory powers - info, audits, remediation, notify other MS, ( after consulting ) public

MS rules on

penalties for

infringement

Other points

Minimum harmonisation, Directive To improve MS cyber-capabilities, co-op / info sharing ( CSIRTs etc. )

(20)

@kuan∅

Timetable

Politically

agreed,

Council

adopted in

1

st

reading

on 17 May

2016

Parliament

adoption

-expected

July 2016;

in force Aug

2016 ?

21 months

for MS to

implement

nationally

• + 6 months to identify operators

So –

probably

2018

(21)

@kuan∅

“Operators”

MSs to identify operators

( list / objective

criteria ) & determine

national regulator(s)

• Banks, financial market

infrastucture, energy, water,

transport, health, digital

infrastructure

( IXPs, DNS providers, TLD

name registries )

• Exceptions - Framework

Directive, EIDAS TSPs,

equivalent sectoral

obligations

Requirements

!=

GDPR ?

• Security - “appropriate and

proportionate” technical &

organisational measures to

manage risks to NIS security

( vs individuals; processing )

• state of the art ( costs ? )

• Notification - “incident”

( event – actual adverse

effect on NIS security ) vs

“personal data breach”

(22)

@kuan∅

DSPs

Lighter requirements, light-touch ex post supervision

• Risk-appropriate

• No extra MS requirements ( unless national security, law enforcement )

Online marketplace, online search engine, cloud provider offering services in EU

• Even SaaS, but excluding SMEs

More from Commission on security elements etc.

(23)

@kuan∅

Incident notification

Operators of essential

services

• “Without undue delay” to competent authority / CSIRT

• If “significant impact” on essential service’s continuity

• Incl. incident affecting DSP relied on for essential service

DSPs

• “Without undue delay”

• If “substantial impact” on provision of service in EU

Guidance ?

(24)

@kuan∅

Possible problems

Operators – multiple

Member States

• “Essential” in some only ?

Slightly different security &

notification requirements

under NISD / GDPR

• Eg notify different

(25)

@kuan∅

Technology issues

Technology-neutrality

Why cloud cf

non-cloud, eg

web hosting ?

Understanding

of technology…

Why SaaS too ?

End to end ?

Not…

Why not

hardware,

software ?

Cf US FTC

(26)

@kuan∅

Practical steps

• Operators – national law, guidance

• DSPs – + Commission acts

Start preparing

now ! And monitor

• Compliance with security &

notification obligations in cloud ?

• Contracts – security, incident

notification requirements;

negotiation with providers !

• Cloud sub-processors ?

Operators –

essential services

relying on cloud

• Systems, processes, etc. as well as

contracts

Cloud services

( & more )

(27)

@kuan∅

Overall summary of practical steps

Start now ! GDPR fines – board…

Contracts – inventory, change control etc.

Systems / processes – change; best practices

• Both security & detection / notification measures

• NB. differences between GDPR / NIS

• Rehearsals etc.

Consider insurance

(28)

@kuan∅

Further info

• Data security developments under the General Data Protection Regulation ( older GDPR draft )

http://www.pinsentmasons.com/en/media/published-articles/gdpr-latest-data-security-developments/

• GDPR contract issues, impact on service providers ( on older GDPR draft )

http://www.scl.org/site.aspx?i=ed43376

• GDPR impact on cloud generally http://www.scl.org/site.aspx?i=ed46375

( shorter version https://iapp.org/news/a/gdpr-killing-cloud-quickly/ )

• Policy problems affecting cloud

http://www.iicom.org/intermedia/intermedia-january-2016/dark-clouds

• GDPR’s application to non-EU organisations

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_8WW30Fjs1MRlQ5NW1LMkxQczg/view ?usp=sharing

• See also http://www.kuan0.com/publications.html and

(29)

@kuan∅

Thank you!

Kuan Hon

Half lawyer | half geek | mostly harmless

Twitter:

@kuan∅

Email: k @ my domain below; also

[email protected]

References

Related documents

For the secondary run of clay batch tests, where multiple replicates of the blank were being compared to multiple replicates of the 5.0 g/L treatment (Section 4.4.1), a

If you spend time with a girl but you’re not sure she would sleep with you, don’t waste your time and move on to meet new people.. On the other hand, if you feel a solid connection

Cloud Consumer Cloud Provider Cloud Service Management Cloud Carrier Cloud Auditor Cloud Consumer Provisioning/ Configuration Portability/ Interoperability Security Audit

Observations of inverse-Compton emission from components of radio-loud AGN in principle allow us to determine the magnetic field strength in those components — the energy loss rate

Summing up, we find a strong indication of a very high cost pass-through rate in the power sector which implies windfall profits, at least for Phase I and II of the EU

In this study, we will take advantage of Cantos and Sánchez’s (2001) lexical constellation model to describe the potential and behaviour of semantic features to shape meanings

De forma exógena, el progresivo eclipse del Estado ha devenido en una subsecuente inestabilidad de las estructuras que articulan a las esferas jurídicas, financieras y políticas

sub cloud provider credit company bank hospital sub cloud provider Cloud provider end user pharma industry sub cloud provider bank hospital sub cloud provider sub