ﻢﻴﺣﺮﻟا ﻦﻤﺣﺮﻟا ﷲا ﻢﺴﺑ
HCV Treatment Failure
HCV Treatment Failure
Gamal
Gamal
Esmat
Esmat
PROF.OF HEPATOLOGY&TROPICAL MEDICINE
PROF.OF HEPATOLOGY&TROPICAL MEDICINE
CAIRO UNIVERSITY
CAIRO UNIVERSITY
Director of Viral Hepatitis Treatment Centers (
Director of Viral Hepatitis Treatment Centers (VHTCsVHTCs)) MOH
MOH--EGYPTEGYPT
www.gamalesmat.com
Determinants OF RESPONCE
Determinants OF RESPONCE
Viral
Viral
Factors:(Genotype
Factors:(Genotype
,, Viral load,
,, Viral load,
Quaisespecies
Quaisespecies
)
)
Drug Factors : (Type of INF , Dose, Duration)
Drug Factors : (Type of INF , Dose, Duration)
Patient Factors:
Patient Factors:
Age, Sex, Ethnicity
Age, Sex, Ethnicity
Infections (HIV,HBV,
Infections (HIV,HBV,
Schistosomiasis
Schistosomiasis
)
)
Metabolic ( D.M, Weight, BMI)
Metabolic ( D.M, Weight, BMI)
Liver histopathology (Cirrhosis ,
Predictors of Treatment Failure
O Genotype
O High pre-treatment HCV RNA O Advanced fibrosis
O BMI >30 O Age >60
Effect of baseline viral load in HCV
Effect of baseline viral load in HCV
-
-
4
4
patients
patients
67 21 13 48 14 38 0 100 SVR Relapse Non-responderHCV RNA at baseline <600,000, IU/ML (n=24) HCV RNA at baseline ≥600,000, IU/ML (n=21)
Huepper et al, Hepatology 46 (4S): 389A, Abstract 336
Predictors of SVR
Viral Load
57 78 65 38 45 42 0 20 40 60 80 100 P er cen ta g e ≤10*5 >10*5 <105 18% >105 82%INF Alfa-2b PEG-INF Total
>105 <105
P = 0.1
P = 0.2
By COBAS Amplicor HCV RNA 2.0 Assay Measured by IU / ML
Liver biopsy : METAVIR scoring system
F1 F2 F3 F4
From Z. Goodman From Z. Goodman
Cirrhosis
The presence of portal fibrosis or cirrhosis is
independently associated with decreased SVR
rates (Wright, 2002).
The use of interferon in patients with cirrhosis
has been limited by concerns regarding
adverse effects, particularly myelosuppression
that can lead to clinically significant
thrombocytopenia or neutropenia (Heathcote,
2000).
SVR rates and impact of fibrosis in
SVR rates and impact of fibrosis in
patients with HCV
patients with HCV
-
-
4
4
65 46.6 46.4 21.2 36 27.3 0 100 F0 - F1 - F2 F3 - F4 Egyptian French African p=0.01 Fibrosis score SVR (%) •pegIFNα-2b (1.5 μg / kg / week) plus RBV (1,000 – 1,200 mg / day) for 48 weeks
Impact of cirrhosis on SVR in
Impact of cirrhosis on SVR in
Chronic Hepatitis
Chronic Hepatitis
43.4 21 57.7 21 0 20 40 60 80 P er cen tag eIFN Alfa-2b PEG-IFN Alfa-2b
Cirrhosis 14% No Cirrhosis 86% Cirrhosis No Cirrhosis
Predictors of SVR
Body Mass Index
47.6 54.2 51.1 33.3 37.2 35 0 20 40 60 80 100 P er cen tag e <30 >30
IFN Alfa-2b PEG-IFN Alfa-2b Overall
>30 31% <30 69% >30 <30 Kg/m2 P = 0.2 P = 0.2 P = 0.08
Predictors
Predictors
of
of
treatment
treatment
failure
failure
In univariate analysis:
Weight > 80 kg
METAVIR score ≥ F3 Steatosis
AFP levels > median value
In multivariate analysis:
AFP levels only
AFP
AFP
analysis
analysis
•
Median (range) serum AFP level was 4.5 (1.2 – 49.8)
ng/mL
•
Overall SVR rate was 61.0% (61/100):
– 80.4% in those with AFP ≤ 4.5 ng/ml – 40.8% in those with AFP > 4.5 ng/ml
•
None of the 7 patients with AFP pretreatment > 15
ng/mL achieved SVR
SVR (%) according to the
SVR (%) according to the
Metavir
Metavir
fibrosis score and median AFP values
fibrosis score and median AFP values
43 39 75 81 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 F1 or F2 F3 or F4
Light grey:
AFP ≤ 4.5 ng/ml
Dark grey:
AFP > 4.5 ng/ml
•
•
Among genotype 4
Among genotype 4
cronic
cronic
hepatitis C patients,
hepatitis C patients,
severe fibrosis,
severe fibrosis,
severe
severe
steatosis
steatosis
,
,
treatment with standard interferon and
treatment with standard interferon and
a high serum AFP level
a high serum AFP level
were all
were all
negatively
negatively
associated with SVR.
associated with SVR.
Pretreatment serum AFP level should be
Pretreatment serum AFP level should be
considered in the routine assessment
considered in the routine assessment
of factors predictive of a treatment response.
of factors predictive of a treatment response.
Liver Int.,2008
♦
Trematode parasitic
infection
♦
Intermediate host:
water snails
♦
Debilitating disease,
severity depends on
“worm load”
Theodor Bilharz (1825-1862) first described the trematode working at Kasr El Ainy hospital in Cairo
in 1851
Is schistosomal infection has an influence on
anti-viral therapy?
EL-Shazly et al., (1994); reported
low rate of
response
in combined infection than in HCV
alone.
The presence of associated schistosomiasis has
determined the response of Egyptians with
chronic hepatitis C to therapy with interferon
(Abdel Basset et al., 1994).
THo IL-2 IFN-γ IL-4 IL-5 IL-10 Th2 IL-4 IL-5 IL-10 + + +
Viral
clearance
IL-2 IFN-γ Th1 + + + Immunopathogenesis of Combined infectionImmunopathogenesis of
Combined Infection
Schistosomiasis appears to
induce Th2 cytokine
profile, with ↑ IL-4, IL-10. It
downregulate
the
stimulatory effect of HCV on
Th1 cytokines
and this
may lead to chronicity of HCV infection in
coinfected patients (El-Kady et al., 2004& 2005).
Predictors of Treatment Failure
O Genotype
O High pre-treatment HCV RNA O Advanced fibrosis
O BMI >30 O Age >60
Poor Adherence to therapy?
0 20 40 60 80 100 Genotype 1 Genotype 2 or 3 ITT 80/8 0/80 <80/ <80/ >80 SVR (%) PEG-IFN α-2b 1.5 μg/kg/wk + RBV 800 mg/day x 48 wks McHutchison JG et al. Gastroenterology 2002;123:1061-1069.
<80/ <80/ >80 80/8 0/80 ITT 88% 94% 95% 48% 63% 34% n=122 n=63 n=32 n=58 n=32 n=19
Impact of Adherence on HCV Response
Rates: PEG-IFN + RBV and 80/80/80
Drug Discontinuation Significantly
Compromises SVR Rates
75 67 12 67 56 7 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 All Genotype 1 Full Dose Dose Reduced Early DiscontinuationFried et al, N Engl J Med, 2002
PEG-IFN α- 2a 180 μg qwk + RBV 1000-1200 mg
Both
Doses ≥80% RBV Dose <80%;PEG Dose ≥80% Treatment Factor
PEG Dose <80%;
RBV Dose ≥80% Doses <80%Both
Davis GL et al. Hepatology 2003;38:645-652.
80% 80% 70% 70% 60% 60% 33% 33% <80% ≥80% 0 50 75 Chance of EVR (%) 25
100 PEG-IFN α-2b start dose: 1.5 μg/kg each week
RBV start dose: 800 mg/d
n=324 n=38 n=3 n=15
Adherence During First 12 Wks of PEG-IFN
α-2b +
RBV Therapy Affects Early Virologic Response
Adherence: Take-home Messages
O
Adherence critical for SVR
– Discontinuations have major impact on SVR
O
Adherence in first 12 weeks of treatment
affects EVR
O
Reasons for lack of adherence:
– Lack of patient education – Lack of support system
PEG Interferon/Ribavirin
Side Effect Profile
z Headache 62% z Fatigue 66% z Myalgia 56% z Anorexia 32% z Nausea 43% * z Diarrhea 22% z Anxiety 47% z Depression 31%
z Insomnia 40% *> 10% difference from interferon/ribavirin
z Cough 23% z Dyspnea 26% z Pharyngitis 12% z Alopecia 36% z Pruritus 29% z Rash 24% z Fever 46%* z Inj Site Rxn 75%*
Time Course of Interferon Side
Effects
Severity Flu-like symptoms Fatigue Depressive/anxiety symptoms IFN Treatment (Weeks) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12Side Effect Management
General Strategies
O GOAL: Encourage patient adherence to
treatment regimen
O Patient education about expectations O Patient self-management techniques
O Regular follow-up visits in a supportive environment
– Permits early detection of emerging AE – Permits early intervention when needed
O Most adverse events are mild to moderate
regardless of therapy
O Dose discontinuation appears to increase with
longer therapy (48 vs 24 weeks)
O Patients can achieve expected response rates only if
they can adhere to treatment
O Side effect management strategies can improve
outcome and QOL
Predictors of Treatment Failure
O Genotype
O High pre-treatment HCV RNA O Advanced fibrosis
O BMI >30 O Age >60
O AFP
O Schistosomiasis