R E S E A R C H
Open Access
Solvability and Mann iterative
approximations for a higher order nonlinear
neutral delay differential equation
Guojing Jiang
1, Young Chel Kwun
2and Shin Min Kang
3,4* *Correspondence:3Department of Mathematics and
RINS, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 52828, Korea
4Center for General Education,
China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to study solvability of the higher order nonlinear neutral delay differential equation
dn
dtn
x(t) +c(t)x(t–
τ
)+ (–1)n+1f(
t,x(σ
1(t))
,x(σ
2(t))
,. . .,x(σ
k(t)))
=g(t), t≥t0,
wherenandkare positive integers,
τ
> 0,t0∈R,f∈C([t0, +∞)×Rk,R),c,g,
σ
i∈C([t0, +∞),R) and limt→+∞σ
i(t) = +∞fori∈ {1, 2,. . .,k}. Under suitableconditions, several existence results of uncountably many nonoscillatory solutions and convergence of Mann iterative approximations for the above equation are shown. Three nontrivial examples are given to demonstrate the advantage of our results over the existing ones in the literature.
MSC: 34K07; 34K11; 34C15
Keywords: higher order nonlinear neutral delay differential equation; uncountably many nonoscillatory solutions; contraction mapping; Mann iterative sequence; error estimate
1 Introduction and preliminaries
In the past twenty years or so, the existence of oscillatory and nonoscillatory solutions for a lot of neutral delay linear and nonlinear differential equations has been studied and discussed by many researchers, for example, see [–] and the references therein.
In , Chuanxi and Ladas [] investigated the first order neutral delay differential equation
d dt
x(t) +p(t)x(t–τ)+Q(t)x(t–σ) = , t≥t. (.)
In , and , Kulenović and Hadžiomerspahić [, ] and Cheng and Annie [] investigated, respectively, the first and second order neutral delay differential equations with positive and negative coefficients:
d dt
x(t) +cx(t–τ)+Q(t)x(t–σ) –Q(t)x(t–σ) = , t≥t (.)
and
d
dt
x(t) +cx(t–τ)+Q(t)x(t–σ) –Q(t)x(t–σ) = , t≥t. (.)
Underc=± and other conditions, they obtained sufficient conditions for the existence
of nonoscillatory solutions of Eqs. (.) and (.), respectively. In , Zhou and Zhang [] extended the result in [] to thenth order neutral functional differential equation with positive and negative coefficients
dn
dtn
x(t) +cx(t–τ)+ (–)n+Q(t)x(t–σ) –Q(t)x(t–σ)
= , t≥t, (.)
wherec=±. In , Liu et al. [] extended and improved the results in [, , , ] to the
followingnth order neutral delay nonlinear differential equation:
dn
dtn
x(t) +cx(t–τ)+ (–)n+ft,x(t–σ),x(t–σ), . . . ,x(t–σk)
=g(t), t≥t, (.)
wherec= –. They gave sufficient conditions for the existence of nonoscillatory solutions
for Eq. (.), constructed the Mann iterative approximations for these nonoscillatory so-lutions and established the error estimates between these nonoscillatory soso-lutions and the Mann iterative approximations. At the same time, they also proved the existence of infinitely many nonoscillatory solutions for Eq. (.).
Inspired and motivated by the results in [–], in this paper, we study the following higher order nonlinear neutral delay differential equation:
dn
dtn
x(t) +c(t)x(t–τ)+ (–)n+ft,xσ (t)
,xσ(t)
, . . . ,xσk(t)
=g(t), t≥t, (.)
wherenandkare positive integers,τ> ,t∈R,c,g,σi∈C([t, +∞),R),limt→+∞σi(t) =
+∞fori∈ {, , . . . ,k}, andf ∈C([t, +∞)×Rk,R) satisfies the following condition:
(H) there exist constantsM>N> and functionsp,q∈C([t, +∞),R+)satisfying
f(t,u, . . . ,uk) –f(t,u¯, . . . ,u¯k)
≤p(t)max|ui–u¯i|: ≤i≤k
, t∈[t, +∞),ui,u¯i∈[N,M], ≤i≤k
and
f(t,u, . . . ,uk)≤q(t), t∈[t, +∞),ui∈[N,M], ≤i≤k,
whereR= (–∞, +∞),R+= [, +∞).
to discuss the error estimates between the approximate solutions and the nonoscillatory solutions. These results obtained in this paper extend, improve and unify the correspond-ing results in [, –].
Throughout this paper, we assume that
(H) t+∞snmax{p(s),q(s),|g(s)|}ds< +∞;
(H) t+∞sn–max{p(s),q(s),|g(s)|}ds< +∞;
(H) {λn}n≥is an arbitrary sequence in[, ]satisfying
∞
m=
λm= +∞.
By a solution of Eq. (.), we mean a functionx∈C([t–τ,∞),R) for somet≥tsuch thatx(t) +cx(t–τ) isn-times continuously differentiable in [t,∞) and such that Eq. (.) is satisfied fort≥t. As is customary, a solution of Eq. (.) is said to be oscillatory if it has arbitrarily large zeros and nonoscillatory otherwise.
LetXdenote the Banach space of all continuous and bounded functions on [t, +∞) with normx=supt≥t
|x(t)|, andA(N,M) ={x∈X:N≤x(t)≤M,t≥t}forM>N> . It is easy to see thatA(N,M) is a bounded closed and convex subset ofX.
2 Main results
Now we study those conditions under which Eq. (.) possesses uncountably many nonoscillatory solutions, and the Mann-type iterative sequences converge to these nonoscillatory solutions.
Theorem . Let(H), (H)and(H)be fulfilled and
c(t) = –, t≥t. (.)
Then
(a) for anyL∈(N,M),there existθ∈(, )andT>t+τ such that for any
x∈A(N,M),the Mann iterative sequence{xm}m≥generated by the following iterative scheme:
xm+(t) =
⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩
( –λm)xm(t) +λm[L– ∞
i= +∞
t+iτ
+∞
sn– · · · +∞
s f(s,xm(σ(s)), . . . ,xm(σk(s)))ds · · ·dsn–dsn–– (–)n
∞
i= +∞
t+iτ
+∞
sn– · · · +∞
s g(s)ds· · ·dsn–dsn–], t≥T,m≥,
xm+(T), t≤t<T,m≥
(.)
converges to a nonoscillatory solutionx∈A(N,M)of Eq. (.)and has the following error estimate:
xm+–x ≤e–(–θ)
m i=λix
–x, m≥; (.)
–fs,y
σ(s)
, . . . ,yσk(s)
ds· · ·dsn–dsn–
≥ |L–L|– ∞
i=
+∞
t+iτ +∞
sn– · · ·
+∞
s
p(s)ds· · ·dsn–dsn–x–y
≥ |L–L|– (n– )!
∞
i=
+∞
T+iτ
sn–p(s)dsx–y
≥ |L–L|–θx–y, t≥T,
which yields that
x–y ≥ |L–L|–θx–y.
That is,
x–y ≥|L–L|
+θ > .
Hencex=y. It follows that for any distinctLandL∈(N,M), the corresponding nonoscil-latory solutions x and y∈ A(N,M) of Eq. (.) are distinct. Consequently, the set of nonoscillatory solutions of Eq. (.) is uncountable. This completes the proof.
The proofs of Theorems .-. are similar to the proof of Theorem ., hence are omit-ted.
Theorem . Let(H), (H)and(H)hold.Assume that there exists C∈(, )such that ≤c(t)≤C for t≥tand M>–CN.Then
(a) for anyL∈(CM+N,M),there existθ∈(, )andT>t+τ such that for each
x∈A(N,M),the Mann iterative sequence{xm}m≥generated by the following iterative scheme:
xm+(t) =
⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩
( –λm)xm(t) +λm{L–c(t)xm(t–τ)
+(n–)! t+∞(s–t)n–f(s,x
m(σ(s)),
. . . ,xm(σk(s)))ds
+((–)n–)!n t+∞(s–t)n–g(s)ds}, t≥T,m≥,
xm+(T), t≤t<T,m≥
(.)
converges to a nonoscillatory solutionx∈A(N,M)of Eq. (.),and the error estimate
(.)holds;
(b) the set of nonoscillatory solutions of Eq. (.)is uncountable.
Theorem . Let(H), (H)and(H)hold.Assume that there exists C∈(, )such that –C≤c(t)≤for t≥tand M>–CN.Then
(a) for anyL∈(N, ( –C)M),there existθ∈(, )andT>t+τ such that for each
Theorem . Let(H), (H)and(H)hold.Assume that there exists C> such that c(t)≥
C for t≥tandCC–N<M.Then
(a) for anyL∈(CM+N,M),there existθ∈(, )andT>t+τ such that for each
x∈A(N,M),the Mann iterative sequence{xm}m≥generated by the following iterative scheme:
xm+(t) =
⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩
( –λm)xm(t) +λm{L–c(t+τ)xm(t+τ)
+
c(t+τ)(n–)! +∞
t+τ (s–t–τ) n–
×f(s,xm(σ(s)), . . . ,xm(σk(s)))ds
+c(t+(–)τ)(nn–)! t++∞τ (s–t–τ)n–g(s)ds}, t≥T,m≥,
xm+(T), t≤t<T,m≥
(.)
converges to a nonoscillatory solutionx∈A(N,M)of Eq. (.),and the error estimate
(.)holds;
(b) the set of nonoscillatory solutions of Eq. (.)is uncountable.
Theorem . Let(H), (H)and(H)hold.Assume that there exists C> such that c(t)≤ –C for t≥tandCC–N<M.Then
(a) for anyL∈(N, ( –
C)M),there existθ∈(, )andT>t+τ such that for each
x∈A(N,M),the Mann iterative sequence{xm}m≥generated by(.)converges to a nonoscillatory solutionx∈A(N,M)of Eq. (.),and the error estimate(.)holds; (b) the set of nonoscillatory solutions of Eq. (.)is uncountable.
Theorem . Let(H), (H)and(H)hold.Assume that there exists C∈(,)such that |c(t)| ≤C for t≥tand N< ( – C)M.Then
(a) for anyL∈(CM+N, ( –C)M),there existθ∈(, )andT>t+τ such that for each
x∈A(N,M),the Mann iterative sequence{xm}m≥generated by(.)converges to a nonoscillatory solutionx∈A(N,M)of Eq. (.),and the error estimate(.)holds; (b) the set of nonoscillatory solutions of Eq. (.)is uncountable.
Theorem . Let n= , (H), (H)and(H)hold and c(t) = for t≥t.Then
(a) for anyL∈(N,M),there existθ∈(, )andT>t+τ such that for every
x∈A(N,M),the Mann iterative sequence{xm}m≥generated by the following iterative scheme:
xm+(t) =
⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩
( –λm)xm(t) +λm{L+ +∞
j=
t+jτ t+(j–)τ
×f(s,xm(σ(s)), . . . ,xm(σk(s)))ds
–+j=∞ tt+(+jjτ–)τg(s)ds}, t≥T,m≥,
xm+(T), t≤t<T,m≥
(.)
converges to a nonoscillatory solutionx∈A(N,M)of Eq. (.),and the error estimate
(.)holds;
(b) the set of nonoscillatory solutions of Eq. (.)is uncountable.
(a) for anyL∈(N,M),there existθ∈(, )andT>t+τ such that for arbitrary
x∈A(N,M),the Mann iterative sequence{xm}m≥generated by the following iterative scheme:
xm+(t) =
⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩
( –λm)xm(t)
+λm{L+(n–)! +∞
j=
t+jτ t+(j–)τ
+∞
u (s–u)n–
×f(s,xm(σ(s)), . . . ,xm(σk(s)))ds du
+((–)n–)!n j+=∞ tt+(+jjτ–)τ u+∞g(s)ds du}, t≥T,m≥,
xm+(T), t≤t<T,m≥
(.)
converges to a nonoscillatory solutionx∈A(N,M)of Eq. (.),and the error estimate
(.)holds;
(b) the set of nonoscillatory solutions of Eq. (.)is uncountable.
Remark . Theorems .-. extend, improve and unify a few known results due to
Cheng and Annie [], Kulenović and Hadžiomerspahić [, ], Liu et al. [] and Zhou and Zhang [] and others.
3 Examples
In this section, in order to illustrate the advantage of our results, we consider the following three examples.
Example . Consider thenth order neutral delay differential equation
dn dtn
x(t) –x(t–τ)
+ (–)n+
e–tcos(√t–t) + sin √
t
+tn+x
t– τx(√t)
=te–tsint– t+ , t≥, (.)
whereτis a positive number. Let{λn}n≥be an arbitrary sequence in [, ] satisfying (H),
MandNbe constants withM>N> . Putt= ,k= ,
σ(t) =t– τ, σ(t) = √
t,
f(t,u,u) =e–t
cos(√t–t) + sin √
t
+tn+u u,
c(t) = –, g(t) =te–tsint– t+ ,
p(t) = M
+tn+, q(t) =e –t
+ M
+tn+
Example . Consider thenth order neutral delay differential equation
dn
dtn
x(t) +tx(t–τ)+ (–)n+
t–
tn+ ln
+x(√t– τ)
+ –t cost
t+tn+ x
(t– ) – x(t– √
t– )
tn++x(t– )
= √
t+tsin(t)
tn++lnt , t≥, (.)
whereτis a positive number. Let{λn}n≥be an arbitrary sequence in [, ] satisfying (H),
MandNbe constants with <N<M. Putt= ,k= ,C= ,
σ(t) = √
t– τ, σ(t) = t– ,
σ(t) =t– √
t– , σ(t) =t– ,
f(t,u,u,u,u) =
t–
tn+ ln
+|u|
+ –t cost
t+tn+ u –
u
tn++u ,
c(t) =t, g(t) = √
t+tsin(t)
tn++lnt ,
p(t) =t –
tn+ +
M| –tcost| t+tn+ +
M(M+ tn+) (N+tn+) ,
q(t) =t –
tn+ ln( +M) +
M| –tcost| t+tn+ +
M N+tn+
fort≥,ui∈Randi∈ {, , , }. Clearly, (H) and (H) hold. It follows from Theorem . that Eq. (.) possesses uncountably many nonoscillatory solutions, and for anyL∈
(M+N,M), the Mann iterative sequence{xn}n≥generated by (.) converges to some nonoscillatory solution of Eq. (.), and the error estimate (.) holds. However, the results in [, –] are not applicable for Eq. (.).
Example . Consider the higher order nonlinear neutral delay differential equation
dn
dtn
x(t) –t–sint t x(t–τ)
+ (–)n+
– tn+
tn+ x (√t)
+ t
(t– )
tn++costsin
x(t)+ – t–t
tn++|x(t)|
= +t
ncostn
tn+ , t≥, (.)
whereτis a positive number. Let{λn}n≥be an arbitrary sequence in [, ] satisfying (H),
MandNbe constants withM> N> . Putt= ,k= ,C= –,
σ(t) = √
t, σ(t) = t, σ(t) = t,
f(t,u,u,u) =
– tn+
tn+ u +
t(t– )
tn++costsin u
+
– t–t
tn++|u |
,
c(t) = –t–sint
t , g(t) =
+tncostn
p(t) =M(t n+– )
tn+ +
Mt|t– |
tn++cost +
M(t+ t– ) (tn++N) ,
q(t) =M
(tn+– )
tn+ +
t|t– |
tn++cost+
t+ t–
tn++N
fort≥,ui∈Randi∈ {, , }. Obviously, (H) and (H) hold. It follows from Theo-rem . that Eq. (.) possesses uncountably many nonoscillatory solutions, and for any
L∈(N,M), the Mann iterative sequence{xn}n≥generated by (.) converges to some nonoscillatory solution of Eq. (.), and the error estimate (.) holds. However, the results in [, –] are not applicable for Eq. (.).
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Author details
1Basic Teaching Department, Dalian Vocational Technical College, Dalian, Liaoning 116035, People’s Republic of China. 2Department of Mathematics, Dong-A University, Busan, 49315, Korea.3Department of Mathematics and RINS,
Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 52828, Korea. 4Center for General Education, China Medical University, Taichung,
40402, Taiwan.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Dong-A University research fund.
Received: 29 November 2016 Accepted: 6 February 2017
References
1. Candan, T: The existence of nonoscillatory solutions of higher order nonlinear neutral equations. Appl. Math. Lett.25, 412-416 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.aml.2011.09.025
2. Candan, T: Nonoscillatory solutions of higher order differential and delay differential equations with forcing term. Appl. Math. Lett.39, 67-72 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.aml.2014.08.010
3. Cheng, JF, Annie, Z: Existence of nonoscillatory solution to second-order linear neutral delay equation. J. Syst. Sci. Math. Sci.24(3), 389-397 (2004) (in Chinese)
4. Chuanxi, Q, Ladas, G: Existence of positive solutions for neutral differential equations. J. Appl. Math. Simul.2, 267-275 (1989). doi:10.1155/S1048953389000213
5. Graef, JR, Yang, B, Zhang, BG: Existence of nonoscillatory and oscillatory solutions of neutral differential equations with positive and negative coefficients. Math. Bohem.124, 87-102 (1999)
6. Kulenovi´c, MRS, Hadžiomerspahi´c, S: Existence of nonoscillatory solution of second order linear neutral delay equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl.228, 436-448 (1998). doi:10.1006/jmaa.1997.6156
7. Kulenovi´c, MRS, Hadžiomerspahi´c, S: Existence of nonoscillatory solution of linear neutral delay equation. Fasc. Math.
32, 61-72 (2001)
8. Liu, Z, Gao, HY, Kang, SM, Shim, SH: Existence and Mann iterative approximations of nonoscillatory solutions of
nth-order neutral delay differential equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl.329, 515-529 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.06.079 9. Zhou, Y, Zhang, BG: Existence of nonoscillatory solutions of higher-order neutral differential equations with positive