Research Report No.7 December, 1957
Measured crop performance
CORN
1957
F. W. BRITTAIN, Research Instructor
In Charge of Variety Testing
Department of Field Crops N. C. State College
Geographic Corn Areas of North Carolina
• LOCATION OF 1957 TRIALS
AREA V
AREA IV SOUTHERN COASTAL PLAIN
PURPOSE OF CORN VARIETY TESTS
1957
This report presents the data of the North Carolina Official Corn Variety
Tests for the 1957 season.
The objectives of these tests are to obtain performance information on
commercially available hybrids and varieties and to evaluate newer ones that
may have possibilities of equaling or excelling those now in general production.
For a hybrid to be eligible for sale in North Carolina, it must have been tested
in at least one area within the past five years.
There is a large number of corn hybrids in production channels. These
hybrids differ in yield, earliness of maturity, disease susceptibility, lodging or
storm resistance, ease of mechanical harvesting, grain quality. susceptibility
outstanding in one or more characteristics may be inferior in others. Some
entries may possess many excellent characteristics and yet may perform very
poorly due to a single inferior characterQ
Some hybrids may perform very well in one or more areas or regions
and perform very poorly in othe r s ,
In order for the producer of corn to choose hybrids that are most likely
to produce high yields and superior quality in a given area, he needs an
histor-ical record of yielding ability and other attribute s as sociated with yieldo
The crop variety testing program attempts to obtain such records and to
provide a source of unbiased and dependable information which can be used as
a basis for deciding which hybrids are most likely to excell under generally
prevailing conditions.
More than 130 hybrids and varieties were tested during the 1957 growing
s ea s on ,
WHO CAN ENTER HYBRIDS AND VARIETIES
Any individual or firm may make application for having hybrids tested"
and in a.ddi.t ion , the Crop Variety Testing Agency may add entries about which
further information is d e sir ed ,
Early in February each year" rules governing the tests for the ensuing
year are distributed to all previous participants and to those who make inquiry.
TEST LOCATIONS
Ten locations repre sent different climatic and soil conditions were chosen
and fifteen separate tests were conducted which included ten full season and five
state.
The testing agency recognizes the cooperative spirit and civic-minded
service rendered by the farmers who have furnished, prepared and cultivated
the land, and also aided in harvesting these tests.
'I'he agricultural workers in their respective areas have contributed to the
success of these tests by aiding in locating, observing and holding field meetings,
as well as utilizing the information.
The contributions of Edwin L. Jones, Scientific Aide, who assisted with
planting, harve sting, collecting of data and in compiling the records are also
recognized.
The tests were conducted on the following private farms and branch
experiment stations:
Area I - Northern Mountains
Upper Mountain Research Station, Dana G. Tugman, Superintendent, Ashe Co unty , Laurel Springs, N. C.
Area II - Southern Mountains
Mountain Research Station, M, R. Whisenhunt, Superintendent, Haywood County, Waynesville, No C.
Area III - Piedmont
(l) Farm of Henry Loflin, Randolph County. Denton, Route 3. Vo-Ag Teacher, R. Co Adams, cooperating.
(2) Farm of Clyde Anderson, Iredell County, Statesville, Route 7. County Agent. Wayne Franklin, and assistants cooperating.
Area IV - Southern Coastal Plain
(1) Farm of Archie Burney, Bladen County, Bladesboro, Route 2. Vo-Ag Teacher, W0 L., Bryant, cooperating.
(2) Farm of Thomas
»:
Hood, Jones County. Dover, Route 2. County Agent, .I, M, Franck, and assistants cooperating.(3) Farm of Henry J. Cross, Johnston County, Selma, Route 2. County Agent, Co W0 Tarlton, and assistants cooperating.
Area V - Northern Coastal Plain
(1) Farm of Horace Cuthrell, Camden County, Belcross. County Agent, Sam Tuten, cooperating.
(2) Farm of Henry Winslow, Martin County, Williamston. County Agent, D. W" Brady, and assistants cooperating.
AGENCIES SPONSORING ENTRIES
Coke r s Pedigreed Seed Company, Hartsville, S. Co
Corneli Seed Company, 101 Chouteau Avenue, St. Louis 2, Missouri
DeKalb Agricultural Association, Inc ,. , 310 N. 5th
se.:
DeKalb, IllinoisFunk Brotherst Seed Company, Bloomington, Illinois
Greenwood Se e d COlnpany, Thomasville t Georgia
McCurdy Seed Company, Inc., Po 00 Box 576, Memphis, Tennessee
Mcl~air Yield Tested Seed Company, Laurinburg, No Co
I~o Co Agricultural Experiment Station, Raleigh, No Co
Pfister Associated Growers, Inc , . Box 56, Huntsville, Alabama
Pioneer Corn Company, Inc , , 221 North Main St , , Tipton, Indiana
Riemers Seed Company, Foley, Alabama
Speight Seed Cornparry , Winterville, No Co
vVatson Seed Farm. Rocky Mount, No C.
MANAGEMENT OF lEST FIELDS
Cultural practices, such as soil preparation, date of planting, fertilizing
and topdre s sing, were in accord with good farm management and were the same
for all entries at each location.
Planting, thinning and harve sting were directly supervised by per sonnel
of the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station.
SEASONAL CONDITIONS
The seasonal conditions for corn production were quite variable in the
state. Some areas suffered from severe drought. while others had sufficient
rainfall distribution to produce fair to good yields of corn. The tests conducted
in Granville and Johnston Counties suffered from drought, while the test in
Bladen County had adequate rainfall to make an above normal yield.
PERFORMANCE RECORDS
Yields for the 1957 corn tests are given for fifteen tests and are
sum-marized by re spective areas.
A single yearIs record at a given location may not portray the true
per-formance of a hybrid or variety over a wide range of seasonal conditions. In
Area III. Piedmont. and in Area IV, Southern Coastal Plain, records of three
tests have been averaged. Likewise, in Area V~ Northern Coastal Plain, two
tests have been averaged. The yeild records of commercially available hybrids
that have been tested in an area for three consecutive years are summarized
and should be utilized when available. You may wish to refer to previous
"Mea sur ed Crop Performancel l bulletins for two-year data or to an Extension
YIELD
'Weights of ear corn were obtained by husking and weighing six replicates
of each entry at each location tested. Statistical analyses were made by
Dr. H. F'G Robinson of the Department of Experimental Statistics.
INSEC T' DAMAGE
"Weevils and other stored grain insects often cause damage to the kernels
on the ears of corn before they are harvested. Some hybrids are damaged more
than others, depending on how well the ears are covered with s hu ck s , earliness
of maturity, and hardiness or starchiness of the kernels.
The tests were all harvested relatively early; therefore, the stored grairL
insect damage was so small that differences could not be distinguished, except
in the Bladen County test.
MOISTURE IN GRAIN
Mois tu r e in the grain is another factor that de te r rnin e s market grade.
F'o r grade l~o. 2 corn, 15. 5 percent moisture is the rna xi rn urn permis sable.
'll1.erefore, samples from all entries of each test are tested for moisture and
adjusted in order that yield comparisons are made at the same moisture
con-te nt , IS.5 percent.
ivlois tu r e content is sometimes used to indicate earliness or maturity
date. Us ualIy the earlier the maturity of the corn the lower the moisture
con-tent. A high percentage of moisture may also indicate that a large number of
the ears have fallen to the ground and have absorbed moisture.
EARS PER 100 STALKS
The number of ears per 100 stalks is a measure of pr olifi c a cy and indicates
EAR HEIGH1'
Ear height was obtained by estimating the ear placement for each entry in
two replications at each location and obrainincr the mean.
b
LODGING
Lodging is a term used to describe stalks that are broken. leaning or
fallen to the ground. All plants broken below the ear or leaning more than 450
fr orn the perpendicular are considered lodged.
DISEASES
Reaction of hybrids to leaf blights (the t wo major ones) has been evaluated
for the past three fears. When weather conditions are good for severe disease
dev e Lop rn e nt , such as 1957 in the western part of the state, it is difficult to
COIll-pare hyb rid s for amount of disease since all were severely attacked. In years
of rn od e r at e disease d e ve Ioprne nt , such as 1956, good comparisons can be made
a1:11.011.g the hybrids tested. When adequate comparisons can be made during two
or three succes sive years, the r e a ct ion of hybrids to leaf blights will be
sum-marized in this bulletin. Preliminary observations indicate that hybrids
devel-oped for all sections of the state show differences in reaction to leaf
blights---Richard Ne I s on
SHORT SEASON vSG FULL SEASOI'~ CORr~
Short season corn is early maturing and is usually sufficiently dry to be
harvested and rn ar ke te d in late August and early September. This type supplies
all early (August and September) market demand, and the production of it has
groWl1. in other Coastal Plain Areas. The short season corn is grown for two
specific purposes: (1) early market and (2) hogging off. The keeping qualities
of the short season hybrids are usually inferiort and unless the grower e xe r ciaes
extra precautions the quality and feed value are likely to deteriorate rapidly
from insect damage.
Short season corn is usually less suitable for storing on the farm because
of this rapid deterioration.
For general farm storing and feeding, full season corn is more likely to
preserve its quality and usually is damaged less by insects. Full season corn
requires from three weeks to one month longer to reach maturity and to become
sufficiently dry to harvest and store. Usually, corn is dry enough to be
PERFORMANCE OF CORN ENTRIES
Three-Year l\.verage -
1955-1956-1957
NOR THERN MOUNT AINS-AREA I
Entries Moisture Ear Ht. Ears/IOO
I
Quality0/0
Inches StalksFunk
G-91
92.8
25.5
1
47
113
3
Funk
G
-...++
r~-;(J-.92.2
27.8
3
42
112
3
N.C.
24
85.8
26. 1
6
40
107
3
DeKalb
837
85.4
27.2
1
42
115
2
Wood
V-30
84.5
28.8
-
2
43
119
2
Pfi ster
(P.AoGo) 401
83.8
26.6
6
47
106
3
Wood
V-26Y
83.2
27.5
1
40
104
2
DeKalb
609
82.9
22,9
-
5
41
119
3
u.s,
282
81.7
32.4
4
54
114
3
-s.
Va. 1163
79.9
24. 1
1
36
118
2
Mean of Standards
79.0
26.0
4.5
43
118
3
U.S.
13
78.7
- -
27.9
5
-
48
123
4
*Miller Special
71. 7
26.0
6
46
115
2
:>:CWhite entries
Standards are U0 S.
13,
N.Co24,
Wov«.
1163
and Miller Special.SOUTHERN MOUNT AINS - AREA II
Entries
I
Yield MoistureI
Lodged IEar Ht. EarsllOO QualityBus/A
0/0
0/0
Inches Stalks*Dixie
17
87.2
24.9
10
66
158
1
*Dixie
29
83,8
26.9
1
57
141
2
*Lance
83.5
23.3
18
56
144
2
Funk
G-134
83.3
21.5
2
45
97
1
Funk G-95A
83. 1
22.4
446
119
2
Funk
G-706
82.7
23. 1
552
113
2
u.
So282
80.7
24.2
8
54
125
2
Wood
V-26Y
80~522.3
447
102
2
Wood
V-30
79. 1
22.7
346
105
2
-Mean of Standards
77.6
24.8
758
132
1.6
N.Co
46
74. 1
23.8
1
50
125
1
24.8
-
64
164
NoC.
27
72.5
12
2
UOSD
13
68.6
24. 1
3
49
110
2
-64
'-,cHolcombe
67.9
23.8
11
130
1
* White entrie s
PERFORMANCE
OF
CORN ENTRIESAREA
III - PiedmontThree-Year Average -
1955-1956-1957
Entries Moisture Ear Ht. Ears/IOO Quality
0/0
Inches Stalks*Dixie
55
93.4
23. 1
25.3
55
136
3
Dixie
82
92.4
24.8
20.7
60
123
1
*Dixie 1
7
92.2
22.9
38.0
54
126
3
No
C.42
90.3
23. 1
28.0
-
55
115
1
*Coker
911
90.3
24.4
24.0
50
131
1
*Pfister (P.A.G.)
.6,5 3W 89.7
23. 1
22.3
48
144
2
*Dixie
29
84.6
22.7
14.0
51
131
2
Mean of Standards
83.6
22.8
- -
19.9
54
126
1
Wood
5-210
83.5
22.6
27.3
50
I I I1
*Funk
G-779W
82.5
24.0
15.3
47
115
2
Pioneer
309A
81.3
22.7
8.0
45
112
2
*U. S.
523W
80.3
20.6
30.7
44
109
2
N.C.
27
79.6
22.2
21.7
52
136 1Pfister {P. A.
G. )486
78.9
24.5
15.0
50
129
2
DeKalb
1024
77.5
20.9
47.0
50
118
2
Funk
G-710A
77.5
23. 1
12. 3
-
53
119
2
* Wood V-I
25
W74.2
20,6
20.7
47
98
2
Funk
G-704
72.4
22. 1
10.3
-
46
99
3
2
McCurdy
1001A
72. 1
22.8
11.0
53
I I IN.C.
1032
71.0
21.4
15.0
54
124
1
*Weekley
62.9
22.4
37.7
53
103
2
*White entries
PERFORMANCE OF CORN ENTRIES
AREA IV - Southern Coastal Plain Three-Year Average - 1955-1956-1957
FU LL SEASON TEST
Entries Moisture
0/0
Lodged
0/0
Ear Hto Ears/IOO
Inche s Stalks Quality
Dixie 82 81.9
*Coker 911 81.7
*Pfister {P.AoGo ),6:5 3W 80. 3
*Dixie 55 79" 4
N.C. 27 78.1
19.7 18.7 1803 1808 180 1 13.0
6:3
12uO 17. 3 1500 55 46 4849
50 131 143 146 133 144 2 2 2 3 2Mean of Standards
x.c.
42N.C. 288 *Dixie 29 *N. Co 29
Speight D-4 Dixie 18
Pfister {PoAoG. )486 *Coker 811 DeKalb 1024 McCurdy 1003 Wood S-211 McCurdy I002A DeKalb 1002 DeKalb 1051 7700 76.4 76.2 74.9 74.8 74.5 73.9 72.9 72.6 71.4 70.9 70.6 69.3 69.0 68. 1 19.2 1901 20.1 190 3 1904 19. 1 19. 7 19.3 20.7 17. 6 19.5 1806 18.2 18. 3 18.6 1300 1600 8.0 1007 180 3 900 10. 3 14.0 4.3 32.0 120 3 14.0 803 23.7 11.0 53 55 47 48 55
49
58 47 48 44 52 49 50 46 49 130 119 118 128 128 136 126 137 134 108 119 126 118 I I I 105 2 2 2 3 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 2 1 3 3* Latham Double 56.1 21.5 2200 55 105 2
*White entrie s
Standards are NoC. 27,N.Co42,Dixie 82, Dixie 18 and Dixie 29.
SHORT SEASON TEST
Entries
-u,
So 523W Pioneer 309A *DeKalb 925Mean of Standards
u,
So 282 NoCo46
Moisture0/0
20.2 21.4 20.0 2100 22.0 20.8 Ear Hto Inches 45 47 4245
47 42 Ears/IOO Quality Stal~s 99 2 952
96 1 96 2 96 1 92 2PERFORMANCE OF CORN ENTRIES
AREA V - Northern Coastal Plain
Three-Year Average-1955-1956-1957
FU LL SEASON TEST
Entries
I
Quality~:~Coker 911 104,,8 23.9 24.3
58 133 1
Dixie 82 103.5 24,,5 23. 3 67
132 1
Dixie 29 102~4 23.3 18.7 54
134 2
*Pfister(P~ A G)653W 101.8 21.5
- -
20.7 55 1361
Nv C. 42 100 •.3 23~2 25.0
6T
1211
Means of Standard s 98.5 22.7 22.3 56 134 2
DeKalb 1023 96,,5 20.7 29.7 53 118 2
Pioneer 309A 93. 1 21~9 14~7 48 114 2
Funk G-710A 93~ 1 23. 1 26~3
6T
128 1NoCo 27 92,,7 21~5 23~ 3 53 147 2
Pioneer 312A 92.5 20.6 18.0 45 118 2
McCurdy 1001A 90.8 21.8 35.0 53 125 1
DeKalb 1002 90.4 20.6 27.0
.2
-
126 3~:CPioneer 510 89.7 20~0 26.7 54 101 2
~~Coker 811 87.9 26.6 20.0 58 127 1
Wood S-210 84.9 22. 1 31.0 53 128 1
}'~Latham Double 70.6 26.8 37.0 67 133 2
*White Entries
Standards are NoC0 4 2t N . C . 2 7 and Dixie 29.
SHOR T SEASON TEST
Yield
I
Moisture LodgedI
Ear Ht. Ear/l00 Quality EntriesBus/ A
0/0
0/0
Inches StalksWood V-S1A 108.6 22. 1 25.7 55 95 2
~:CUo
s.
S23W 105.8 22.2 26.7 46 95 1McCurdy 988 105.2 21~ 3 20.7 46 102 2
~.cWood V-125W 102~9 25 . .3 21.9 50 101 2
Funk G-S12W 100~6 22.3 34.3 48 94 2
Pioneer 301A 99.3 20. 1 17.3 38 94 2
Funk G-134 97.2 21.3 20,,3 42 97 2
-Mean of Standards 9684 23.1 29.2 47 94 1
Funk G-704 94.8 23.0 18.3 45 92 2
-Do So 282 93.2 24. 1 39.0 49 94 1
Wood V-26Y 91~3 21.2 11~0 41 93 3
-NoCo 46 90" 1 23~, 0 22,,0
-
45 96 1Ohio C-54 85.2 19.2
-n
39 96 3SUMMAR Y OF PERFORMANCE - NOR THERN MOUNT AINS - AREA I
1957 - Ashe County
Yield Moisture ,Ears/lO"O
0/0
Exposed Quality Yellow EntriesSus/A
0/0
Stalks Ear Tips**
New Jersey 9 103.2 24.4 41 102
46
3V. Po 10 653 102.0 25.9 43 I I I 36 2
V. P.10 648 100.1 26. 1 44 98 46 3
Funk G-91 97.5 22.3 3t6 106 28 3
Pioneer 301A 97.4 21.4 35 115
56
4DeKalb 630 96.0 23.5 5 39 110 35 2
DeKalb 633 95.5 21.7 3 37 96 0 2
McCurdy 123-2 94.9 23.1
7;
41 102 32 3*NC 4217 93.8 28.0 2 40 96 20 2
*DeKalb 6025 93.5 23.3
-
1 38 108 4 2DeKalb 803A 93.4 23.4 4 38 102 18 3
Wood V -26Y 91~9 22.6
-
2 37 10536
-
3)'.cNC 4042B 91.8 28.9 3 39 123 19 2
-
67
Funk G-95A 90.3 23.0 4 32 107 4
-DeKalb 609 90. 1 20.0 8 41 115 72 4
U.So 282 89.7 30.5 ----#10 52 102 31 3
Wood V-3D 88.5 27.1 2 44 108 85 4
New Jersey 10 88.2 26.2
7;
46 102 62 4-Funk G-144 88. 1 23.6
-
4 37 115 26 3U.So 13 85.4 23.9 7 39 110 44 4
N.C. 24 85.4 22.7 17 37 96 24 3
v .
Po I. 426 85.4 25.6...
2 35 I I I 41 4Pioneer 301 B 84.0 21.8
-
9 31 105 46 3Pfister (PoAoG.) 401 84.0 22.4 11 43 102 54 4
Funk G-50 83.4 22.7 8 37 115 29
2
Mean of Standards 82.6 22.8 11 37 106
36 2
-DeKalb 837 80. 1 24.4 1 37 100
27 2
WIt Va.1163 78.7 22.4 4 29 122
45 3
36.2
-
65 960
3:>:CDeKalb 5352 77d7 2
Funk G-76
76.2
24.9 4 28 9539 3
White Entrie s
Mean of Standards 82.6 22.8 11 37
106 36 3
--
96 29 2Miller Special 80.9 22.0 17 42
LoSoDo (. 05) 13.8
)',c Experimental entries
**
1 • best quality in testW.
v«.
1163 and Miller Special.SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE - SOUTHERN MOUNTAINS - AREA II.
1957 - Haywood County
Ear Ht. Ears/IOO Inche s Stalks
2 3 3 2 2 1 1 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 3 2 2 3 4 3 3 12
o
29 23 26 26 9o
57o
o
13 2754
54
52 28 8 7 48 29 4756
174
248
2 27 1 63 2 32 2 53 216
1
26 2 44 30/0
Exposed QualityEar l'ips
**
92
100 100 10298
100 10998
106 108 112 108126
102 102 113 96 91 13389
98 84 51 5145
5245
56
56
37 43 4654
58 51 5848
5754
5766
69 5368
48 98 4298
44 104 4194
49 98 51 9845
92
44 96 51 124 40 110 6 4 5 5 5 1 1 7 10 2 4 7 5 5 1 4"6
3 10 3 6 1 9 11 17
1 2005 2101 18.8 1804 220 1 2007 19.0 2101 2108 1902 22.3 18.4 2109 1900 2100 2302 2308 19.9 2100 18. 1 2405 23012504
25.6 21e 426.9 2202 2602 2401 28~9 25Cl2
2609
Moisture0/0
8602 85.9 8508 8503 850 184.7
8403 8306 83.1 82.7 79.57701
7600
7504 7202 70096907
69.4 6703 5707 57.3 5407 Yellow EntriesNew Jersey 9
VA Po 10 648
Pfister (PoAoGo)444 Funk G-134
Wood V-30
Wood Vaco2 6 Y
DeKalb 801
v .
Po 10 653*NC 4097
Funk G-95AFunk
G".,706
UoSo 13
New Jer sey 10 McCurdy 988 ~~NC 502Z DeKalb 1028 Pioneer 309A
v.r-.r.
426 DeKalb 837Pfister{Po A G )401
Early South
Mean of Standards Funk G-711
DeKalb 1027
NaCo 46
McNair 42
DoSo 282
DeKalb 1201
NoCo 27 ~~DeKalb 5379
F unk G.- 7 11 B
*DeKalb 5346 1 1 2 2 2 1
o
2 11 23o
4 118 102 122 10896
124 66 5349
58 50 64 15 9 1 28 76
25.6 26.5 2002 2301-
24.0 2300White Entrie s
Dixie 17 8407
Dixie 29 790 5
Lance 7707
Mean of Standards 770 1
Pfister(PClA G )633W 6804
Holcombe
65. 8
t.,SoDo (005) 120 6
*Experimental entries
**1
=
best quality in testSUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE - PIEDMO!'~T - AREA III
Granville, Randolph and Iredell Counties
1957
-!ellow Entrie s Moisture Ear s/100
0/0
Exposed Quality0/0
Stalks Ear Tips *':CPioneer 309B 66.8 19.3 4
44
112 5 2Dixie 82 66.3 21. 1 3
56
99 1 2Speight D-4 65.0 20.0
-
3 47 98 -0 2l/[cI'~air 444 64.8 19.7 3 -51 97
-
4 1~~Col~er 67 64.7 21. 3
-
2-
50 100 0 1*
lvlc Na.i r 48 64.1 18.6 6 47 106 1 1*Speight D-6 62.7 18.7 5
-
41 93 2 1Funk G-704 62.6 17. 3 10-
-
41 92 14 3Me an of Standards 62.6 19-.8 5. 6
-
51.4 106.4 1.6 1.8Vvood 5-210 62.5 18.3 -6- 47 91
- -
2 1l\l. C. 42 62.0 19.8 10 53 104 2 2
Pi o ne e r 309A 61.8 19.5 5 Li2 97 11 2
Mc Nai r 446 61.4 19.3
-
7-
52 95 1 2-~~DeKalb 61018 61.3 17. 8 6 30 105 10 3
*lv1cNair 42 60.9 18.7 6 52 101 0 2
McCurdy 1001A 60.7 19. 1 5 52 105 13 2
-DeKalb 1024 60.5 17.4 21 46 101 3 2
Mc Nai r 584 60.4 20.4 3 55 III 1 1
-
-l"~.C. 288 60.3 19.9
-
5 57 91 2 111 3
DeKalb 893 60.3 18.6 7 45 97
lviid South 60.0 20.3
-
2-
49 95 4 2Pfi ster (P. A. G )488 59.2 20.6 3 47 97 1 2
-
-Mc Cur d'y 1003A 59.0 21.0 3 48 99 0 1
-
-DeKalb 1051 58.6 18.9
-
5 53 88 10 294 10 3
':~I~C 4057 58.4 19.5 11 42
1~.C. 27 58.3 19.2 3 51 112
-
1 1Wo od V -44 58.1 18.3 16 38
87
73
U.S. 282 57.7 20.0 21
-
44 85 14 2Funl~ G-730 57.2 20.0 3 47 101 0
2
-
-::~Speight D-7 56.3 19.7 3 52 94 1
2
continued
SU¥MARY OF PERF'ORMANC~- PIEDMOr'~T - AREA III
Granville. Randolph and Ir edell Countie s
1957
-'1ellow Entrie s Ear Ht. Ear s
/100
%
Exposed ~ualityIr.ch e s Stalks Ear Tips *~:~
DeKalb
1002
56.2
18.8
18
4293
243
Funk G-~l1OA
56. 1
20.3
5
49
113
10
2-Riemer
204
55.1
19.0
15
47
96
24 2Pfister (P.L\..G.) 486 54.7
19.8
5
-
4795
2 2~~~NC 5018
54.0
1"'.9
-
3
-
379
~I15
2IJ.C.
1032
53.4
19.3
849
106
4 2n.
C.46
52.1
18.4
3
-
43
91
8 2IvlcNair
308
48.4
1
~/.1
14
-
-
3893
15
3tNhite Entries
Dixie
29
73.1·
19.3
4 48 I I I0
266.9
-Dixie
17
19.4
9
52
116
4 3Me an of Standards
62.6
19.8
5.6
51.4
106.4
1.6
1.8
Pfis t e r (P .A.G . )
65 3
W62. 1
19.6
3
48108
2 2Coker
911
61. 7
19.8
346
95
7 2Dixie
55
60.7
19.4
649
100
-
1
3{Nood V
-125W
59.6
18. 1
14
45
91
5
3
lvicNair
425
58.5
21.6
-
449
93
3 26
2'Wood
5-352
57.7
19.3
17
50
99
DeKalb
1102
55. 1
18.7
16
49
95
13
2F'urik G-7~/9W
54.2
20.8
5
45
90
6 2U.S. 523V/
52.0
18.0
23
36
-
97
4 3'"v
e clcl ey
49. 7
19.0
16
51
81
10
2
~:( Experimental entrie s ~:~::'
1
=
best qualitySUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE - SOUTHERN COASTAL PLAIN -AREA IV
Bladen, Jones and Johnston Counties
1957 - Full Season Test
Yellow Entries Quality
.**
Dixie 82 92.3 20.0 24 62 135 0 1 2
Funk G-730 91.2 18. 7 14 53 131
-
1 1 2Florida 200 90. 1 21.7
-
2063
131 2 0 1General Jackson 89.9 20.4
-
12 63 117 3-
1 2*NC 7009 89.8 20.5
-
9 49 118 3 1 2~~Coker 66 89.8 20.2 5 57 156 1 0 1
*Coker 67 88.9 21.2 3 54 133 3
-
0 1Pfister(P.A. G. )487 88. 1 18.4 19
-
60 137 3-
1 2Mean of Standards 88.0 18.9 20.2 58.6 133.4 0.2 0.8 2
~
-Pioneer 309 B 87.5 18.9 8 112 7 2 3
Speight D-4 86.8 18.7 18 54 130 1 1 1
-DeKalb 1023 84.9 17.6 47 53 118 21 2 3
-N.C. 27 84. 1 18.4 22 54 134 1 1 2
-*NC 4067 83.9 18.5 10 53 112
-
0 1 3Dixie 18 83.8 19.7 18 65 141 0 0 2
N.C. 42 83.7 18.6 21 60 123 0 1 2
-No C. 288 83.3 19.8
-
17-
52 I I I 1 1 22
*Funk G- 55190 82.9 19.7 17 57 109 1 0
-
-Pfister (P.A. G.) 486 81.9 18.0 21 52 134 6 1 2
~rNC 5068 81.7 20.0 17 50 110 2 1 2
Funk G-740 81.2 20.4
-
17 61 115 3 1 2116 1 1 2
Wood S-211 80.9 18.0 23 52
McCurdy 1003C 80.8 18. 1 25
56
120 2 1 2General Lee 79.0 20.5 13
60
118-
0-
0 2McCurdy 1002A 78. 3 1 7.7 14 55 112 2 1 1
Keystone 256 78.0 18.9 27 55 I I I 1 1 2
McNair 582 78.0 19.9 30
6T
131 1 1 1McCurdy 1002C 77.5 1 7.5 23
-
53 120 3 1 221 2 3
DeKalb 1002 76.1 17.7 39
-
48 101McCurdy 1003 74.5 19.2 22 58 I I I 1 0 2
continued
-17-continued
SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE - SOUTHERN COASTAL PLAIN - AREA IV
Bladen, Jones and Johnston Counties
1957 -
Full Season TestYellow Entrie s Ears/IOO
0/0
Exposed Quality0/0
Stalks Ear Tips**
DeKalb
1051
74. 1
18.0
16
54
96
10
2
3
DeKalb
1024
72.9
17. 1
-
48
46
114
13
2
3
Latham Yellow
68.4
19.3
29
56
106
1
1
2
*DeKalb
61018
67.0
16. 3
7
-
31
96
10
2
4
White Entries
Dixie
55
97.8
17.9
27
54
142
0
2
3
96.3
-
-Dixie
29
18.0
16
52
134
0
1
2
Mean of Standard s
88.0
18.9
20.2
58.6
133.4
0.2
0.8
2
- -
--
-Pfister
(PoA.Go) 653W 87. 7
17.5
17
51
142
1
1
2
-N.C.
29
86.8
19. 7
21
54
138
5
0
3
Coker
911
84.2
19. 3
12
49
136
6
1
2
Funk
G-785W
79.8
18.9
18
53
132
1
1
2
-
-Coker
811
77.7
21.2
7
50
128
0
0
2
36
-DeKalb
1102
76.6
17.8
55
106
8
1
3
Latham Double
67. 1
21. 1
27
60
100
1
0
2
*Experimental entrie s
**
1
=
best quality2 : 5-150/0
damage***
Score from Bladen County test only.o
=
no damage1 : 0-50/0
damage3
=
15 - 300/0
damage4
=
over300/0
damageStandards are
NoC. 27,
N.C.42,
Dixie18,
Dixie29
and Dixie82.
-18-SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE - SOUTHERN COASTAL PLAIN - AREA IV
Bladen, Jone s and Johnston Countie s
1957 - Short Season Test
Yellow Entries Yield Moisture Lodged Ear Ht.\ EarS/IOO!
%
ExposedI
weeVil\Quality Bus/A 0/0 0/0 lnche s Stalks Ear Tip sS~c;>:ct;:~e
~:c*
Coker 15 77.6 18.7 5 43 132 9 1 1
Pioneer 309A 75.5 19.0
-
3 48 99-
4-
1 2*NC 4057 75. 1
--
-19.0 20 44 98 10 2 3
New Jersey 9 73.0 17.2 9
-
42 98-
18 2 2McCurdy 988 72.5 16.8 17
-
-
48 99 21 2 2Mean of Standards 71.5 18.7 12 46 103 13 1.7 2
-
--~~NC'5033 70.9 17.8 11 40 101 25 3 3
Wood V-30 70. 7 18.2
b
40 91 47 3 3Pfister (P.A.G.) 401 70.2 16.4 11
-
-
44 99 32 4 3Wood V-26Y 70.2 15.4
"6
40 94 17 3 3New Jer sey 10 70.2 17.3 15 43 89 21 3 3
N.C. 46 69.8 18.4 7 45 102 8 2 2
69.7
-
96Wood V-44 18.2
-
4-
42 20 3 2U. S. 282 69.3 19.0 15 47 101 26 2 1
Watson 516 69.0 18.0 6 42 86 10 2 2
Funk G-7l0A 66.9 21. 1 8 53 118 4 1 1
6 26
-DeKalb 837 66.2 16.4
-
39 97 3 331 2 2
McNair 304 64.9 16.8 9 42 94
V. P. I. 426 61.0 16.4 5 33 98 18 4 3
Ohio C-54 61.0 16.4 5 35 100 36 4 4
White Entrie s
Pfister (P.A.G.) 633 86. 7 18.4 4 46 104 1
1 1
-
46-
-DeKalb 925 80.5 18. 1 12 106 3
1 1
46
6
-U. S. 523W 75.4 18.6 14 107
1 2
-
-Mean of Standards 71.5 18.7 12 46 103 13
1.7 2
-
--DeKalb 923 67.7 17.8 22 45 85
7 2 2
*
Experimental entrie s**
1=
best quality in testo
=
no damage 1
=
0 - 50/0 damage 2=
5 -150/0 damage***
Score from Bladen County test only.3
=
15 - 300/0 damage 4=
over 300/0 damageSUMMAR Y OF PERFORMANCE - NOR THERN COAST AL PLAIN - AREA V
Martin and Camden Counties 1957 - Full Season Test
Yellow Entrie s Yield Moisture Lodged
I
Ear Ht. Ears/lOO0/0
EXPosed\ QualityBus/A
0/0
0/0
Inches Stalks Ear Tips *~~NoC. 42 104.7 20.7 21 59 107 10 2
Dixie 82 102.3 21.6 19 64 124 2 2
DeKalb 1024 100.7 18.6 36 55 99 48 2
NoCo 288 99.9 22.4 10 51 110 4 1
Mean of Standard s 99.7 20.8 18.7 53.7 I I I
-
9 2McCurdy 1003A 99.4 21.4 25 56 114 1 2
)',cDeKalb 61019 99.2 19.2 13 48 96 25
-
3McCurdy 1000A 99. 1 19.9 29 54 107 9 2
Funk G-730 98.7 20.2 23 56 109 3 2
~~DeKalb 61023 98.4 19.8 20 50 99 23 3
*Coker 66 98.0 23.5 10 53 124 4 2
*Coker 67
-
56
-97.0 21.7 7 121 0 2
96.4
-*NC 60Q4 21.4 14 54 101 10 1
96.4
-Wood V-51A 18.5 38 51 90 43 2
Pioneer 309A 96.3 20.2 9 47 95 13 2
Pioneer 309 B 96.1 20.0 7 46 105 15 2
Pioneer 312A 96. 1 18.4 5 45 98 24 3
-
56
8 1*McNair 48 95.9 19.5 21 128
-Speight D-4 95.4 20.4 20 49 122 7 2
*NC 5097 94.2 21.5 17 55 100 13 2
DeKalb 1023 93.0 18.9 29 52 97 53 3
DeKalb 1051 92.4 19.6 17 58 95 39 3
DeKalb 1002 91.3 18.5 23
-
45 100 59 3106 18 2
Pfister (P.A.G.) 488 89.6 22.3
-
18-
51vtJ
ood S- 21 0 88.2 19. 1 19 50 98 20 2l'~. C. 27 87.3 21.0 21 50 117 6
2
-Funk G-710A 86. 1 21.7 21 55 104 21
2
White Entries
Dixie 29 107.0 20.6 14 52 109
11 2
Coker 911 100~ 1 20.9 13 54 120
6 2
McNair 423 99.7 20.2 9 52 124
17 2
Mean of Standards 99.7 20.8 18. 7 53.7 I I I 9
2
--
49 131 7 3Pfister (P.A.G.) 65 3W 97.8 20.6 19
Funk G-779W 97.5 19.9 29 52
116 38 3
Coker 811 87.2 23.8 17 52
122 5 2
86.6 17.9 15 45 97 36 2
Pioneer 510
72.6 18.4 35 53 90 17
3 DeKalb 1102
60. 1 23.8 21
60
96 82 Latham Double
~c Experimental entries *~:c 1
=
be st qualitySUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE - NOR THERN COAST AL PLAIN - AREA V
Camden and Martin Counties 1957 - Short Season Test
y
Yellow Entrie s Yield .\ Moisture
I
Lodged EarHLI
Ears/IOO%
EXPosed;\QualitBus / A
%
0/0
Inches Stalks Ear Tips**
Wood V-51A 100.8 18. 1 33 51 87 38 2
Pfister (P.A.G.)401 99.0 16.9 16 39 101 68 3
*Pioneer 2990 98.4 16.8
-
12-
38 92 49 3Pioneer 301 B 97.3 16.9
-
8 35 99 49 3McCurdy 988 97.1 17.7 24
-
-
43 95 35 2New Jer sey 9 94.8 18.8 11 39 90 40 3
Wood V -26Y 94.3 17.8
-
8 39 95 37 4Funk G-704 94. 1 20.3 16 43 87 26 3
Vvood V -44 94.0 18.4
-
10-
40 93 50 2Pioneer 301A 93.9 16.9
16
34 91 57 2v,
P. I. 426 93.6 17.7 5 35 100 38 3Funk G-134 93.5 18.5 13 42 93 17 3
Pfister (P.A.G.}444 93.2 18.4
-
10 37 10066
3DeKalb 803 92.4 18.5 8 40 86 18 2
~cCoker 15 92.1 19.2 17
-
48 104 13 1Watson 516 91.3 17. 6 11 41 96 22 2
~;~r~c 5033 91.3 19.6 11 40 88 35 3
Wood V-30 90.7 19.2 17 37 87 56 3
-*NC 4217 90.5 20. 1
-
5 42 87 45 2*DeKalb 61003 87.6 18. 1 9 34 92 8 3
Mean of Standards 87.2 19.4 28.7 44.7 90.3 21 1.3
- -
-DeKalb 855 86.8 17.7 9 40 98 9 2
6
-Ohio C-54 86.3 16.8
-
-
35 95 42 3McNair 306 86.2 17.2
-
22-
40 91 49 3McNair 304 84.0 1 7.2 18 41 98 37 2
U.S. 282 83.8 20.6. 35 45 88 38 2
N.C. 46 81.5 19.0
-
20-
43 92-
13 1New Jer sey 10 80.7 18. 3 21 43 80 48 4
Pfister (P.A.G.) 234 79.5 16.5 13
36
95 56 2White Entrie s
*Coker 616 110.0 20.5 13 47 120 8
1
-
-U.S. 523W 96.2 18.8 31 46 91
14 1
-Wood V -125W 89.9 17.6 29 51 92 10
2
Funk G-512W 87.9 19.2 41 44 82
16
2
-Mean of Standards 87.2 19.4 28~ 7 44.7 90.3 21
1.3
DeKalb 707 82.8 16.7 24 41
81 34 2