• No results found

On the Stability of a New Pexider Type Functional Equation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "On the Stability of a New Pexider Type Functional Equation"

Copied!
22
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Volume 2008, Article ID 816963,22pages doi:10.1155/2008/816963

Research Article

On the Stability of a New Pexider-Type

Functional Equation

Kil-Woung Jun,1, 2 Yang-Hi Lee,3and Juri Lee2

1National Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Daejeon 305-340, South Korea

2Department of Mathematics, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 305-764, South Korea

3Department of Mathematics Education, Gongju National University of Education,

Gongju 314-711, South Korea

Correspondence should be addressed to Yang-Hi Lee,[email protected]

Received 1 October 2007; Accepted 31 January 2008

Recommended by Patricia Wong

We establish the generalized Hyers-Ulam stability of a Pexider-type functonal equationf1xy

z f2xy f3xzf4xyzf5xyf6xz 0, which is mixed of a quadratic and

an additive functional equations. Also, we obtain its general solution from the stability results.

Copyrightq2008 Kil-Woung Jun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Introduction

In 1940, Ulam 1raised the following question. Under what conditions does there exist an additive mapping near an approximately additive mapping?

In 1941, Hyers2proved that iff :VXis a mapping satisfying

fxyfxfyδ 1.1

for allx, yV, whereV andXare Banach spaces andδis a given positive number, then there exists a unique additive mappingT :VXsuch that

fxTxδ 1.2

(2)

the so-called generalized Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability see also 4, 7–10. Jun et al.11–13 also obtained the Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of the Pexider equation of fxy gx hy. Quadratic functional equation was used to characterize inner product spaces14. Several other functional equations were also to characterize inner product spaces. A square norm on an inner product space satisfies the important parallelogram equality

xy2xy22x2y2. 1.3

The functional equation

fxy fxy 2fx 2fy 1.4

is related to a symmetric biadditive function14. It is natural that each equation is called a quadratic functional equation. A stability problem for the quadratic functional equation was proved by Skof15for a functionf:VX, whereV is a normed space andXa Banach space. Cholewa16noticed that the theorem of Skof is still true if the relevant domainV is replaced by an Abelian group. Czerwik17proved the Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of the quadratic functional equation. Jun and Lee13, 18–22proved the Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of the Pexiderized quadratic equation

fxy gxy 2hx 2ky. 1.5

Now, we introduce the following new Pexider type functional equation:

f1xyz f2xy f3zxf4xyzf5xyf6xz 0, 1.6

which is mixed of a quadratic and an additive functional equations. In this paper, we establish the generalized Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability for1.6on the punctured domainV \ {0}and obtain its general solution from the stability results. Throughout this paper, letV andXbe a normed space and a Banach space, respectively. For convenience, we employ the operators as follows: for a given functionϕ:V\{0}×V\{0}×V\{0}→0,∞, letϕ, ϕe, ϕe :V\{0}3→0,∞, M, M, M

e, Me :V \ {0}→0,∞be functions defined by

ϕx, y, z: 1

2

ϕx, y, z ϕx, y, z,

ϕex, y, z: 1 2

ϕx, y, z ϕx,y,z,

ϕ

ex, y, z: 14ϕx, y, z ϕx, y, z ϕx,y,z ϕx,y,z,

Mx:ϕx

2, 3x

2 ,x 2

2ϕ

x

2, x 2,

x 2

ϕx

2, x 2,

x 2

,

Mx:ϕx

2, x 2,

3x 2

2ϕ

x

2, x 2,

x 2

ϕx

2, x 2,

x 2

,

Mx:ϕx

2, 3x

2 ,x 2

2ϕ

x

2, x 2,

x 2

ϕx

2, x 2,

x 2

,

M

ex:ϕe x

2, x 2,

3x 2

2ϕe

x

2, x 2,

x 2

ϕ

e x

2, x 2,

x 2

1.7

(3)

2. Generalized Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability

We need the following lemma to prove our main results.

Lemma 2.1. Letabe a positive real number. LetΦ:V \ {0}→0,be a map such that

Φx:∞ l0

1 al

2lx<∞ ∀ xV \ {0} 2.1

or

Φx:∞ l0

alΦ x 2l1

<∞ ∀xV \ {0}. 2.2

Suppose that the functionf :VXsatisfies the inequality

fxf2ax≤ Φax 2.3

for allxV \ {0}andf0 0. Then, there exists exactly one functionF:VXsatisfying

fxFxΦx xV \ {0}, aFx F2x xV. 2.4

Proof. First we assume thatΦsatisfies

l0

Φ2lx

al1 <∞ 2.5

for allxV \ {0}. Replacingxby 2nxand dividing it byanin2.3, we have

fa2nnx

f2n1x an1

≤ Φ

2nx

an1 2.6

for alln∈NandxV \ {0}. Induction argument implies that

fxf

2nx an

n−1

s0

Φ2sx

as1 2.7

for alln∈NandxV \ {0}. Hence

fa2nnx

f2mx am

m−1

sn

Φ2sx

as1 2.8

for all positive integers m > n and xV \ {0}. This shows that {f2nx/an} is a Cauchy sequence forxV \ {0}and thus converges. Therefore, we can defineF :VXsuch that

Fx ⎧ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎩

lim n→∞

f2nx

an , if x /0, 0, if x0

(4)

for allxV. From2.7and the definition ofF, we obtain

fxFx≤Φx, aFx F2x 2.10

for allxV \ {0}. Now, letF:V \ {0}→Xbe another mapping satisfying the above inequality and equality. Then, it follows that

FxFxf

2mx am

F2mx am

f

2mx am

F2mx am

≤ Φ

2mx am

2.11

which tends to zero by the definition ofΦ as m→∞ for all xV. So we can conclude that Fx Fxfor allxV. This proves the uniqueness ofF.

Next we assume thatΦsatisfies

l0

alΦ x 2l1

<∞ 2.12

for allxV \ {0}. Replacingxby 2−n−1xand multiplying it byan1in2.3, we have

anf2nxan1f2n−1xanΦ2n−1x 2.13

for alln∈NandxV \ {0}. Induction argument implies that

fxanf2nxn−1 s0

asΦ2s−1x 2.14

for alln∈NandxV \ {0}. Hence

anf2nxamf2mxm−1 sn

asΦ2s−1x 2.15

for all positive integers m > n and xV \ {0}. This shows that {anf2−nx} is a Cauchy sequence forxV \ {0}and thus converges. Therefore we can defineF :VXsuch that

Fx ⎧ ⎨ ⎩

lim n→∞a

nf2nx ifx /0,

0 ifx0 2.16

for allxV. From2.14and the definition ofF, we obtain

fxFx≤Φx, aFx F2x 2.17

for allxV \ {0}.

The uniqueness ofFis proved similarly as the first case. This completes the proof.

(5)

Theorem 2.2. Letϕ:V \ {0} ×V \ {0} ×V \ {0}→0,be a function such that

ϕx, y, z:∞ l0

1 4l1ϕ

2lx,2ly,2lz<∞ a

holds for allx, y, zV \ {0}. If the even functionsf1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6:VXsatisfy the inequality

f1xyz f2xy f3xzf4xyzf5xyf6xzϕx, y, z 2.18

for all x, y, zV \ {0}, then there exists exactly one quadratic function Q : VX satisfying the inequalities

f1xf10−Qx

1 2

ϕx

2, 3 2x,x

ϕx

2, x 2,x

1

2M2x Mx ϕ

x

4, x 4,

x 2

ϕx

4, x 4, x 2 , 2.19

f2xf20QxMx ϕx

4, 3x

4 ,x 4 ϕ x 4, x 4, x 4 ,

f3xf30−QxMx ϕ

x

4, x 4,

3x 4

ϕx

4, x 4, x 4 ,

f4xf40Qx 1 2 ϕ x 2, 3 2x,x

ϕ

x

2, x 2,x

1

2M2x Mx ϕ

x

4, x 4,

x 2 ϕ x 4, x 4, x 2 ,

f5xf50QxMx ϕx

4, 3x

4 ,x 4 ϕ x 4, x 4, x 4 ,

f6xf60−QxMx ϕ

x

4, x 4,

3x 4

ϕx

4, x 4, x 4 2.20

for allxV \ {0}, where

Mx:∞ l0

1 4l1M

2lx, Mx:

l0

1 4l1M

2lx 2.21

for allxV \ {0}. Moreover, the functionQis given by

Qx lim n→∞

fk2nx

4n 2.22

(6)

Proof. Replacexby−xin2.18to obtain

f1xyz f2xy f3xzf4xyzf5xyf6xzϕx, y, z

2.23

for allx, y, zV \ {0}. From2.18and2.23, we get f1f4

xyz f2f5

xy f3f6

xz

f1f4

xyzf2f5

xyf3f6

xzϕx, y, z ϕx, y, z 2.24

for allx, y, zV \ {0}. Let the functionsF, G, H:VXbe defined by

Fx 1 2

f1x f4xf10−f40

,

Gx 1 2

f2x f5xf20−f50

,

Hx 1 2

f3x f6xf30−f60

2.25

for allx, y, zV. Then, it follows from2.24that

Fxyz Gxy HxzFxyzGxyHxzϕx, y, z

2.26

for allx, y, zV \ {0}, whereϕx, y, z 1/2ϕx, y, z ϕx, y, z. Replaceyandzbyx and−xin2.26to get

H2xG2xϕx, x,x 2.27

for allxV \ {0}.

Replacingy,zbyxin2.26and using2.27, we get

F3xFx2G2xϕx, x, x ϕx, x,x 2.28

for allxV \ {0}. Replacingx,y,zbyx, 3x,−xin2.26and using2.27, one obtains

F3xFxG4x 2G2xϕx,3x,x ϕx, x,x 2.29

for allxV \ {0}. From2.28and the above inequality, we have

G4x−4G2xϕx,3x,x 2ϕx, x,x ϕx, x, x 2.30

for allxV \ {0}. Replacingxbyx/2 and dividing it by 4 in the above inequality, we get

GxG2x

4

Mx

(7)

for allxV \ {0}. ByLemma 2.1, there exists limn→∞G2nx/4nfor allxV satisfying

Gx−lim n→∞

G2nx 4n

Mx 2.32

for allxV \ {0}, where

Mx:∞ l0

1 4l1M

2lx. 2.33

By the similar method in obtaining inequality2.32, we get

Hx− lim n→∞

H2nx 4n

Mx 2.34

for allxV \ {0}, where

Mx:

l0

1 4l1M

2lx. 2.35

From2.27, we have

lim n→∞

G2nx 4n nlim→∞

H2nx

4n 2.36

for allxV. From2.36, we can define a mapQ :VXby

Qx lim n→∞

G2nx

4n 2.37

for allxV. It follows from2.26,2.32, and2.37that FxQx 1

2

Fx Gx H

3 2x

G2xH x

2

1

2GxQx

Fx Gx H

1 2x

H

3 2x

1

2G2xQ2x

≤ 1

2ϕ

x

2, 3 2x,x

1

2M2x 1 2ϕ

x

2, x 2,x

Mx

2.38

for allxV \ {0}. Replacingxby 2nx, dividing it by 4nin the above inequality and taking the limit in the resulted inequality asn→∞, we have

lim n→∞

F2nx

4n Qx 2.39

for allxV. Using2.26,2.36,2.37, and2.39, we obtain

(8)

for allx, y, zV \ {0}. Replacingxandzbyx/2 in2.40and using the factQ0 0, we have

Qxy Q x

2 −y

QyQ x

2 y

Qx 0 2.41

for allx, yV. Replacexandzbyx/2 and−x/2 in2.40to have

Qy Q x

2 −y

QxQxyQ x

2 y

0 2.42

for allx, yV. Subtracting2.41from2.42and using the evenness ofQ, we lead to

Qxy Qxy−2Qx−2Qy 0, 2.43

for allx, yV.

On the other hand, it follows from2.18and2.23that f1−f4

xyz f2−f5

xy f3−f6

xz f1−f4

xyz f2−f5

xy f3−f6

xzϕx, y, z ϕx, y, z 2.44

for allx, y, zV \ {0}. Let the functionsF, G, H:VXbe defined by

Fx 1

2

f1xf4x

, Gx 1

2

f2xf5x

, Hx 1

2

f3xf6x

2.45

for allx, y, zV.

From2.44, we have

Fxyz Gxy Hxz Fxyz Gxy Hxzϕx, y, z

2.46

for allx, y, zV \ {0}. Replacey,zbyxin2.46to get

F3x Fx G2x G0 H2x H0ϕx, x, x 2.47

for allx, y, zV \ {0}. Replacex,y,zbyx, 3x,−xin2.46to get

F3x Fx G2x G4x H2x H0ϕx,3x,x 2.48

for allx, y, zV \ {0}. From2.47and the above inequality, we have

G4xG0ϕx,3x,x ϕx, x, x 2.49

for allxV \ {0}.

Replacex,y,zbyx,x,−3xin2.46to get

(9)

for allx, y, zV \ {0}. From2.47and the above inequality, we get

H4xH0ϕx, x,3x ϕx, x, x 2.51

for allxV \ {0}. It follows from2.46that

F4xF0F0 G0 H3x F2x G2x Hx

F4x G0 Hx F2x G2x H3x

ϕx, x,2x ϕx, x,2x

2.52

for allxV \ {0}. By the definitions ofF, G, H, F, G, H, we have f1xf10−Qx Fx FxF0−Qx,

f2xf20−Qx Gx GxF0−Qx,

f3xf30−Qx Hx HxH0−Qx,

f4xf40−Qx FxFx F0−Qx,

f5xf50−Qx GxGx G0−Qx,

f6xf60−Qx HxHx H0−Qx

2.53

for allxV \ {0}. Hence by using2.32,2.34,2.36,2.37,2.38,2.49,2.51, and2.52, the inequalities in2.19can be shown. The uniqueness ofQfollows fromLemma 2.1.

Theorem 2.3. Letϕ:V \ {0} ×V \ {0} ×V \ {0}→0,be a function such that

ϕx, y, z:∞ l0

4 x

2l1,

y 2l1,

z 2l1

<∞ a

holds for all x, y, zV \ {0}. If the even functions f1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6 : VX satisfy inequality

2.18for allx, y, zV \ {0}, then there exists exactly one quadratic functionQ : VXsatisfying inequalities2.19for allxV \ {0}, where

Mx:∞ l0

4lM x

2l1

, Mx:∞ l0

4lM x

2l1

. 2.54

Moreover, the functionQis given by

Qx lim n→∞4

nf

k2−nxfk0 2.55 for allxV and fork1,2,3,4,5,6.

Proof. The proof is similar to that ofTheorem 2.2.

Applying Theorems 2.2and2.3, we get the following corollary in the sense of Rassias inequality.

Corollary 2.4. Letp /2andε >0. If the even functionsfi:VX,i1,2, . . . ,6, satisfy f1xyz f2xy f3xzf4xyzf5xyf6xz

εxpypzp 2.56

(10)

Then there exist exactly one quadratic functionQ:VXsatisfying f1xf10−Qx

1

3p112p2 2·2p2p−4

73p 2·2p

4 4p

·ε·xp,

f4xf40Qx13p112p2 2·2p2p−4

73p 2·2p

4 4p

·ε·xp,

fjxfj0Qx 3p11 2p2p−4

3p5 4p

·ε·xp

2.57

for allxV \ {0}andj 2,3,5,6. Moreover, the functionQis given by

Qx ⎧ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎩ lim n→∞

fk2nx

4n if p <2,

lim n→∞4

nf

k2−nxfk0 if p >2

2.58

for allxV \ {0}andk1,2,3,4,5,6

Proof. ApplyTheorem 2.2forp <2 andTheorem 2.3forp >2.

We establish Theorems2.5and2.6for the odd functions.

Theorem 2.5. Letϕ:V \ {0} ×V \ {0} ×V \ {0}→0,be a function such that

ϕx, y, z:∞ l0

1 2l1ϕ

2lx,2ly,2lz<∞ b

holds for allx, y, zV \ {0}. If the odd functionsf1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6:VXsatisfy

f1xyz f2xy f3xzf4xyzf5xyf6xzϕx, y, z

2.59 for allx, y, zV \ {0}, then there exist exactly three additive functionsA, A1, A2:VXsatisfying

f1xAx A1x A2xϕx

4, x 4,

x 2

ϕx

4, x 4, x 2 2M x 2

ϕx

2, x 2, x

ϕx

2,x 2, x

,

2.60

f2xAxA1xMx ϕ

x

2, 3x

2 ,x 2

ϕx

2, x 2, x 2 ,

f3xAxA2xMx ϕx

2,x 2,

3x 2

ϕx

2, x 2, x 2 ,

f4xAxA1xA2xϕx

4, x 4,

x 2

ϕx

4, x 4, x 2 2M x 2

ϕx

2, x 2, x

ϕx

2,x 2, x

,

f5xAx A1xMx ϕx

2, 3x

2 ,x 2

ϕx

2, x 2, x 2 ,

f6xAx A2xMx ϕx

2,x 2,

3x 2

ϕx

(11)

for allxV \ {0}, where

Mx:∞ l0

1 2l1M

2lx, Mx:

l0

1 2l1M

2lx,

ϕx, y, z:

l0

1 2l1ϕ

2lx,2ly,2lz. 2.62

Moreover, the functionsA, A1, A2are given by

Ax lim n→∞

f1

2nxf4

2nx 2n1 ,

A1x nlim→∞

f2

2nxf5

2nx 2n1 ,

A2x nlim→∞

f3

2nxf6

2nx 2n1

2.63

for allxV.

Proof. Replacexby−xin2.59to obtain

f1xyzf2xyf3xz f4xyz f5xy f6xzϕx, y, z 2.64

for allx, y, zV \ {0}. Let the functionsF, G, H:VXbe defined by

Fx 1 2

f1x f4x

, Gx 1

2

f2x f5x

, Hx 1

2

f3x f6x

2.65

for allx, y, zV. From2.59and2.64, we get

Fxyz Gxy HxzFxyzGxyHxzϕx, y, z

2.66

for allx, y, zV \ {0}. From2.66, we have

H2xG2xϕx, x,x, 2.67

for allxV \ {0}. It follows from2.66and2.67that

G4x−2G2xF3xFx G2x G4xH2x

2H2x−2G2xF3x FxG2xH2x

ϕx, x, x 2ϕx, x,x ϕx,3x,x

2.68

for allxV \ {0}. Replacingxbyx/2 and dividing it by 2 in the above inequality, we obtain

GxG2x

2

Mx

(12)

for allxV \ {0}. ApplyingLemma 2.1, we obtain

Gx− lim n→∞

G2nx 2n

Mx 2.70

for allxV \ {0}. Similarly we have

Hx− lim n→∞

H2nx 2n

Mx 2.71

for allxV \ {0}. From2.67, we get

lim n→∞

G2nx 2n nlim→∞

H2nx

2n 2.72

for allxV and we can define a functionA:VXby

Ax lim n→∞

G2nx 2n nlim→∞

H2nx

2n 2.73

for allxV \ {0}. It follows from2.66and2.70that FxAxFxHx

4

Fx 2

Gx 2

H3x 4

H3x 4

Fx 2

Gx 2

Hx 4

2G

x

2

−2A x

2

ϕx

4, x 4,

x 2

ϕx

4, x 4,

x 2

2M

x

2

2.74

for allxV \ {0}. Replacingxby 2nx, dividing it by 2nin the above inequality and taking the limit in the resulted inequality asn→∞, we obtain

lim n→∞

F2nx

2n Ax 2.75

for allxV \ {0}. From2.73and2.75, we have

Axyz Axy AxzAxyzAxyAxz 0 2.76

for allx, y, zV \ {0}. Replaceyandzby 2yandxin2.76to obtain

A2x2y Ax−2y A2yAx2yA2x 0 2.77

for allx, y, zV \ {0}. Replaceyandzby−2yandxin2.76to get

(13)

for allx, yV \ {0}. Since A0 0 andA2x 2Ax, using the above two equalities, we have

Axy AxyA2x 0 2.79

for allx, yV. Hence,Ais an additive function. Let the functionsF, G, H:VXbe defined by

Fx 1

2

f1xf4x

, Gx 1

2

f2xf5x

, Hx 1

2

f3xf6x

2.80

for allx, y, zV. From2.59and2.64, we have

Fxyz Gxy Hxz Fxyz Gxy Hxzϕx, y, z

2.81

for allx, y, zV \ {0}. It follows from2.81that

GxG2x

2 ≤ 1

2 F3x

2

Fx

2

Gx G2x Hx

1 2

F3x

2

Fx

2

Gx Hx

≤ 1

2ϕ

x

2, 3x

2 ,x 2

1

2ϕ

x

2, x 2,

x 2

2.82

for allxV \ {0}. ApplyingLemma 2.1, we obtain an odd functionA1:VXdefined by

A1x nlim→∞

G2nx

2n ; 2.83

and the inequality

GxA

1xϕ

x

2, 3x

2 ,x 2

ϕx

2, x 2,

x 2

2.84

holds for allxV \ {0}. Similarly we have an odd functionA2:VXdefined by

A2x nlim→∞

H2nx

2n 2.85

for allxV and the inequality HxA

2xϕ

x

2,x 2,

3x 2

ϕx

2, x 2,

x 2

2.86

for allxV \ {0}. Replacex,y,zbyx,x,−xin2.81to get

(14)

for allxV\ {0}. Replacingxby 2n−1xand dividing it by 2nin the above inequality, we obtain

2F2n−1xG2n2nxH2nxϕ

2nx,2nx,−2nx

2n 2.88

for allxV \ {0}. Taking the limit in the above inequality asn→∞, we have

lim n→∞

F2nx

2nA1xA2x 2.89

for allxV \ {0}. It follows from2.81that

Fx F2x

2 ≤ 1

2

F2x G0Hx

2

Fx Gx H3x

2

1 2

Fx GxHx

2

F0 G0 H3x

2

≤ 1

2

ϕx

2, x 2, x

ϕx

2, x 2,x

2.90

for allxV \ {0}. ApplyingLemma 2.1and2.89, we have Fx A

1x A2xϕ

x

2, x 2, x

ϕx

2, x 2,x

2.91

for allxV \ {0}. From2.81,2.83,2.85, and2.89, we have

A1xyzA2xyz A1xy A2xzA1xyz

A2xyz A1xy A2xz 0

2.92

for allx, y, zV \ {0}. Replaceyandzby 2yandxin2.92to get

A12x2yA22x2y A1x−2y A12y A22y A22x A1x2y 0

2.93

for allx, yV \ {0}. Replaceyandzbyxand 2yin2.92to get

A12x2yA22x2y A2x−2y A12y A22y A12x A2x2y 0

2.94

for allx, yV \ {0}. From the above two equalities, we get

A1−A2

x−2yA1−A2

2x A1−A2

x2y 0 2.95

for allx, yV \ {0}. SinceA0 0, we have

A1−A2

x−2yA1−A2

2x A1−A2

(15)

for allx, yV. HenceA1−A2is additive, that is,

A1−A2

xy A1−A2

x A1−A2

y 2.97

for allx, yV. Replacezby−yin2.92to obtain

A1xA2x A1xy A2xyA1xA2x A1xy A2xy 0 2.98

for allx, yV \ {0}. SinceA1−A2is additive, we have

A22xA2xyA2xy A12xA1xyA1xy 2.99

for allx, yV \ {0}. From this and2.98, we get

A14x 2A1xy 2A1xy 0 2.100

for allx, yV \ {0}. From this andA10 0, we have

A1xy A1x A1y 2.101

for allx, yV. SinceA1andA1−A2are additive,A2is additive.

From2.74,2.91, and the definitions ofF, F, we have f1xAx A1x A2xFxAxFx A

1x A2x

ϕx

4, x 4,

x 2

ϕx

4, x 4, x 2 2M x 2

ϕx

2, x 2, x

ϕx

2, x 2,x

2.102

for allxV \ {0}. The rest of inequalities in2.60can be shown by the similar method.

Theorem 2.6. Letϕ:V \ {0} ×V \ {0} ×V \ {0}→0,be a function such that

ϕx, y, z:∞ l0

2 x

2l1,

y 2l1,

z 2l1

<∞ b

holds for allx, y, zV\{0}. If the odd functionsf1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6:VXsatisfy inequalities2.59

for allx, y, zV \ {0}, then there exist exactly three additive functionsA, A1, A2 :VXsatisfying

the inequalities2.60for allxV \ {0}, where

Mx:∞ l0

2lM x

2l1

, Mx:

l0

2lM x

2l1

,

ϕx, y, z:

l0

2 x

2l1,

y 2l1,

z 2l1

.

2.103

Moreover, the functionsA, A1, A2are given by

Ax lim n→∞2

n−2

f1 x 2n f4 x 2n

f1

x

2n

f4

x

2n

,

A1x nlim→∞2n−2

f2

x

2n

f5

x

2n

f2

x 2n f5 − x 2n ,

A2x nlim→∞2n−2

f3

x

2n

f6

x

2n

f3

x 2n f6 − x 2n 2.104

(16)

Proof. The proof is similar to that ofTheorem 2.5.

Applying Theorems 2.5and2.6, we get the following corollary in the sense of Rassias inequality.

Corollary 2.7. Letp /1. If the odd functionsfi:VX,i1,2, . . . ,6, satisfy

f1xyz f2xy f3xzf4xyzf5xyf6xz

εxpypzp 2.105

for allx, y, zV \ {0}.

Then there exist exactly three additive functionsA, A1, A2:VXsatisfying

f1xf10Ax A1x A2x 2 2p

4 4p

23p114·2p2·4p 4p2p−2

·ε·xp,

f2xf20−AxA1x

23p8 2p2p−2·ε·x

p,

f3xf30AxA2x 23p8 2p2p−2·ε·x

p,

f4xf40−AxA1xA2x

2 2p

4 4p

23p114·2p2·4p 4p2p−2

·ε·xp,

f5xf50−Ax A1x

23p8 2p2p−2·ε·x

p,

f6xf60Ax A2x 23p8 2p2p−2·ε·x

p

2.106

for allxV \ {0}. Moreover, the functionsA, A1, A2are given by

Ax ⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ lim n→∞ f1

2nxf4

2nxf1

−2nxf4

−2nx

2n2 , if p <1,

lim n→∞2

n−2

f1 x 2n f4 x 2n

f1

x

2n

f4

x

2n

, if p >1,

A1x

⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ lim n→∞ f2

2nxf5

2nxf2

−2nxf5

−2nx

2n2 , if p <1,

lim n→∞2

n−2

f2

x

2n

f5

x

2n

f2

x 2n f5 − x 2n

, if p >1,

A2x

⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ lim n→∞ f3

2nxf6

2nxf3

−2nxf6

−2nx

2n2 , if p <1,

lim n→∞2

n−2

f3

x

2n

f6

x

2n

f3

x 2n f6 − x 2n

, if p >1

2.107

(17)

Proof. ApplyTheorem 2.5forp <1 andTheorem 2.6forp >1.

We establish the following theorem for the general case from Theorems2.2and2.5.

Theorem 2.8. Letϕ:V \ {0} ×V \ {0} ×V \ {0}→0,be a function that satisfies conditionsa andb. Suppose that the functionsfi:VX,i1,2, . . . ,6, satisfy the inequality

f1xyz f2xy f3xzf4xyzf5xyf6xzϕx, y, z

2.108

for allx, y, zV \ {0}. Then there exist exactly one quadratic functionQ : VXand exactly three additive functionsA, A1, A2:VXsatisfying

f1xf10−QxAx A1x A2x

≤ 1 2 ϕ e x 2, 3 2x,x

ϕ e x 2, x 2,x

2ϕe

x

4, x 4,

x 2

2ϕe

x 4, x 4, x 2 1

2Me2x Mex 2Me x 2 ϕ e x 2, x 2, x

ϕ

e x

2,x 2, x

,

f2xf20QxAxA1x

Mex ϕ

e x

4, 3x

4 ,x 4 ϕ e x 4, x 4, x 4

Mex ϕ

e x

2, 3x

2 ,x 2 ϕ e x 2, x 2, x 2 ,

f3xf30QxAxA2x

M

ex ϕe x

4, x 4,

3x 4 ϕ e x 4, x 4, x 4 M

ex ϕe x

2, x 2,

3x 2 ϕ e x 2, x 2, x 2 ,

f4xf40QxAxA1xA2x

≤ 1 2 ϕ e x 2, 3 2x,x

ϕ e x 2, x 2,x

2ϕe

x

4, x 4,

x 2

2ϕe

x 4, x 4, x 2 1

2Me2x Mex 2Me x 2 ϕ e x 2, x 2, x

ϕ

e x

2,x 2, x

,

f5xf50−QxAx A1x

Mex ϕ

e x

4, 3x

4 ,x 4 ϕ e x 4, x 4, x 4

Mex ϕ

e x

2, 3x

2 ,x 2 ϕ e x 2, x 2, x 2 ,

f6xf60−QxAx A2x

Mx ϕ

e x

4, x 4,

3x 4 ϕ e x 4, x 4, x 4 M

ex ϕe x

2, x 2,

(18)

for allxV \ {0}, where

Mex:∞ l0

1 4l1Me

2lx, Mex:

l0

1 4l1M

e2lx,

Me:

l0

1 2l1Me

2lx, Me:

l0

1 2l1Me

2lx,

ϕex, y, z:

l0

1 2l1ϕ

e2lx,2ly,2lz

2.110

for allxV \ {0}. Moreover, the functionQis given by

Qx lim n→∞

fk2nxfk−2nx

2·4n 2.111

fori1,2,3,4,5,6and the functionsA, A1, A2are given by

Ax lim n→∞

f1

2nxf4

2nxf1

−2nxf4

−2nx 2n2 ,

A1x nlim→∞

f2

2nxf5

2nxf2

−2nxf5

−2nx 2n2 ,

A2x nlim→∞

f3

2nxf6

2nxf3

−2nxf6

−2nx 2n2

2.112

for all, xV.

Proof. From2.108, we obtain

f1−xyz f2−xy f3−xzf4−xyzf5xyf6−xz

ϕx,y,z 2.113

for allx, y, zV \ {0}. From2.108and this inequality, one gets

f1exyz f2exy f3exzf4exyzf5exyf6exzϕex, y, z,

f1oxyz f2oxy f3oxzf4oxyzf5oxyf6oxzϕex, y, z

2.114

for all x, y, zV \ {0}, wherefkex fkx fkx/2, fkox fkxfkx/2 for all xV \ {0}, k 1,2,3,4,5,6. Since fke is an even function, fko is an odd function, and fk fkefko, we can apply Theorems2.2and2.5to get the desired result.

We establish the following theorem for the general case from Theorems2.2and2.6.

Theorem 2.9. Letϕ : V \ {0} ×V \ {0} ×V \ {0}→0,be a function that satisfies conditions aandb. If the functionsf1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6 : VX satisfy inequalities2.108for allx, y, z

(19)

A, A1, A2:VXsatisfying the inequalities inTheorem 2.8for allxV \ {0}, whereMe, Meare as inTheorem 2.8and

Mex:∞ l0

2lMe x

2l1

, M

ex:

l0

2lMe x

2l1

,

ϕex, y, z:

l0

2lϕe x

2l1,

y 2l1,

z 2l1

2.115

for allxV\ {0}. Moreover, the functionQis given by2.111and the functionsA, A1, A2are given

by

Ax lim n→∞2

n−2

f1

x

2n

f4

x

2n

f1

x

2n

f4

x

2n

, 2.116

A1x nlim→∞2n−2

f2

x

2n

f5

x

2n

f2

x

2n

f5

x

2n

,

A2x nlim→∞2n−2

f3

x

2n

f6

x

2n

f3

x

2n

f6

x

2n

2.117

for allxV.

We establish the following theorem for the general case from Theorems2.3and2.6.

Theorem 2.10. Letϕ : V \ {0} ×V \ {0} ×V \ {0}→0,be a function that satisfies conditions aandb. If the functions f1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6 : VXsatisfy inequalities 2.108for all x, y, z

V \ {0}, then there exist exactly one quadratic functionQ:VXand exactly three additive functions A, A1, A2:VXsatisfying the inequalities inTheorem 2.8for allxV \ {0}, whereMe, Me,ϕeare as inTheorem 2.9and

Mex:∞ l0

4lMe x

2l1

, M

ex:

l0

4lMe x

2l1

2.118

for allxV \ {0}. Moreover, the functionQis given by

Qx lim n→∞2·4

n−1f

k2−nxfk−2−nx−2fk0 2.119

fori1,2,3,4,5,6and the functionsA, A1, A2are given by2.116for allxV.

Corollary 2.11. Letp /1,2andε >0. Suppose that the functionsfi:VX,i1,2, . . . ,6, satisfy f1xyz f2xy f3xzf4xyzf5xyf6xz

εxpypzp 2.120

(20)

Then there exist exactly one quadratic function Q : VX and three additive functions A, A1, A2:VXsatisfying

f1xf10−QxAx A1x A2x

3p112p2

2·2p2p−4

113p 2·2p 1

8 4p

23p114·2p2·4p 4p2p−2

·ε·xp,

f2xf20QxAxA1x 3p11 2p2p−4

3p5 4p

23p8 2p2p−2

·ε·xp,

f3xf30QxAxA2x 3p11 2p2p−4

3p5 4p

23p8 2p2p−2

·ε·xp,

f4xf40QxAxA1xA2x

3p112p2

2·2p2p−4

113p 2·2p 1

8 4p

23p114·2p2·4p 4p2p−2

·ε·xp

f5xf50−QxAx A1x

3p11 2p2p−4

3p5 4p

23p8 2p2p−2

·ε·xp,

f6xf60QxAx A2x 3p11 2p2p−4

3p5 4p

23p8 2p2p−2

·ε·xp

2.121

for allxV \ {0}. Moreover, the functionQis given by2.111forp < 2and2.119forp > 2and the functionsA, A1, A2k1,2,3are given by2.112forp <1and2.116forp >1.

Corollary 2.12. Letε >0be a fixed real number. Suppose that the functionsfi:VX,i1,2, . . . ,6, satisfy

f1xyz f2xy f3xzf4xyzf5xyf6xzε 2.122 for allx, y, zV \ {0}.

Then there exist exactly one quadratic function Q : VX and three additive functions A, A1, A2:VXsatisfying

f1xf10−QxAx A1x A2x≤17ε,

f2xf20−QxAxA1x≤ 28

3 ε, f3xf30QxAxA2x 28

3 ε,

f4xf40−QxAxA1xA2x≤17ε,

f5xf50−QxAx A1x≤ 28

3 ε, f6xf60QxAx A2x28

3 ε

References

Related documents

Rassias, “On the stability of the non-linear Euler-Lagrange functional equation in real normed linear spaces,” Journal of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, vol.. Rassias, “On

Rassias, “On the stability of the linear mapping in Banach spaces,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , vol.. G˘avruta, “A generalization of the

Radu, “On the stability of the additive Cauchy functional equation in random normed spaces,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and

Radu, “On the stability of the additive Cauchy functional equation in random normed spaces,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications , vol.. Mihet¸, “Fuzzy stability

Rassias, “On the generalized Hyers-Ulam stability of the quadratic functional equation with a general involution,” Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Applications, vol..

Park, “Fixed points and Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of Cauchy-Jensen functional equations in Banach algebras,” Fixed Point Theory and Applications , vol.. Han, “Functional

Park, “Fixed points and Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of Cauchy-Jensen functional equations in Banach algebras,” Fixed Point Theory and Applications , vol.. Park,

Radu, “On the stability of the additive Cauchy functional equation in random normed spaces,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications