EU support for
Innovation Procurement
Lieve Bos
European Commission
DG CONNECT (Communication Networks)
F2 unit (“Innovation”)
Supplier B Supplier C Supplier D
Phase 1
Solution design Prototype Phase 2 development
Phase 3
Original development of limited volume of first test products /
services Supplier A Supplier B Supplier C Supplier D Supplier B Phase 0 Curiosity Driven Research
Applied R&D / Pre-commercial Procurement (PCP)
Phase 4
Deployment of commercial volumes of end-products
Wide diffusion of newly developed solutions
Supplier D
Public Procurement of Innovative Solutions (PPI)
•
PCP
to steer the development of solutions towards concrete public
sector needs, whilst comparing/validating alternative solution
approaches from various vendors
•
PPI
to act as launching customer / early adopter / first buyer of
innovative commercial end-solutions newly arriving on the market
Supplier(s) A,B,C,D and/or X
Also normally multiple sourcing here to keep competition going
Innovation Procurement
Complementarity PCP & PPI
Objectives:
–
Price/quality products that better fit public sector needs
–
Earlier customer feedback for companies developing solutions
Examples: EU funded PCP/PPI projects in ICT
More info on: http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/eu-funded-projects
SILVER (PCP)
Robotics ageing well
DECIPHER (PCP)
Services mobile health data
CHARM (PCP)
Traffic Management
V-CON (PCP)
Virtual road infrastructure modelling
PRACE 3IP (PCP)
Smart Textiles ICT for fire fighters
SMART@FIRE(PCP)
High Performance Computing
THALEA (PCP)
Cloud for Europe (PCP)
Cloud computing
PREFORMA (PCP)
Long term digital preservation
IMAILE (PCP)
Personalised learning needs
ENIGMA (PCP)
Photonics City Lighting
UNWIRED-HEALTH (PCP)
NYMPHA-MD (PCP)
Mobile care for vaccination & heart failure
Mental care for bipolar disorders
Tele-detection/care of ICU patients
STOP AND GO (PPI)
Telecare for elderly with multiple conditions
HEALTH
TRANSPORT
ENERGY
E-GOV
EDUCATION
SAFETY
Horizon 2020 support
for innovation procurement
CSAs and
Coordination and Support Actions (100% funding rate):
Support only coordination activities e.g. for preparation of a PCP or PPI by a group of procurers (identifying common challenges among procurers,
conducting open market consultations with industry before initiating a concrete PCP or PPI procurement etc)
CSAs do not provide EU cofunding for an actual PCP or PPI procurement
PCP cofund Actions (70% funding rate):
Provides EU cofunding for an actual PCP procurement (one joint PCP
procurement per action) + for related coordination and networking activities (e.g. to prepare, manage and follow-up the PCP call for tender)
PPI cofund Actions (20% funding rate):
Provides EU cofunding for an actual PPI procurement (one joint PPI
procurement per action) + for related coordination and networking activities (e.g. to prepare, manage and follow-up the PPI call for tender)
Minimum of 3 independent participants from 3 different MS or AC, of which
minimum 2 public procurers (buyers group) from 2 different MS or AC
Public procurers are contracting authorities or contracting entities as define in the EU public procurement directives
They can be complemented by other types of procurers that are providing
services of public interest and share the same need to procure R&D or
innovative solutions
E.g. NGOs or private procurers
Other entities may participate as direct beneficiaries on condition that they
add value to the action, are not potential suppliers of solutions sought for
by the PCP/PPI and have no other type of conflict of interest
Assisting the procurers in the preparation, implementation and follow-up
PCP/PPI Cofund actions
Participation
Beneficiaries
Action contains beneficiaries that undertaken together the PCP or PPI procurement, the buyers group & the lead procurer
Buyers group
Procurers in the action that provide the financial commitments to undertake the PCP or PPI procurement
Min 2 public procurers from 2 different Member States or associated countries
Lead procurer
Procurer appointed by buyers group to lead and coordinate the PCP or PPI procurement
Third parties linked to beneficiaries
E.g. Third parties (e.g. end-users such as fire brigade) putting resources (e.g. test sites, testers) at the disposal of the beneficiaries (e.g. the ministry of internal affairs that is the procurer for the fire brigades) to carry out the action
Subcontractors
Successful tenderers, selected by the buyers group & lead procurer as result of the PCP or PPI call for tender, to provide the R&D services (PCP) or innovative solutions (PPI). They do 'NOT' become partners in the MGA.
Preparation stage
Preparation of one joint PCP or PPI procurement per action
Open market consultation /verification of market readiness to meet procurement need
If relevant to the action, other networking or coordination activities
Outcome
Agreed common tender specifications Joint procurement agreement
Confirmation of commitment on availability of financial commitments to start PCP or PPI
Execution stage
Joint procurement of the R&D services (PCP) or innovative solutions (PPI) Implementation of the procurement contracts /payment of providers
Assessment of the outcomes of the procurement
Confirmation of 'after-PCP/PPI' strategy for dissemination/exploitation of results If relevant to the action, other networking or coordination activities
Reimbursement rate direct costs: Max 70% of eligible costs for PCP cofund
actions, Max 20% of eligible costs for PPI cofund actions
Eligible direct costs to carry out eligible activities defined in WP include:
- Price of the R&D services (PCP) or innovative solutions (PPI) procured (if procurement conducted in compliance with requirements in Annex E WP)
- Eligible coordination and networking activities
- May include in-kind contributions (e.g. third parties putting resources at disposal of beneficiaries e.g. for testing of solutions)
- VAT is an eligible cost unless for beneficiaries that can deduct it
Flexibility: Consortium may choose to use part of the Union contribution to
increase the support to coordination and networking activities/budget for call for tender as long as the Union contribution does not exceed 70% (PCP)/20% (PPI) of the sum of those costs and the price of the call for tender/coordination and networking activities. Requested reimbursement for coordination and networking can comprise max 30% (for PCP) / max 50% (for PPI) of total requested grant
Plus 25%
for indirect costs.
But, no indirect costs on the price of the PCP/PPI procurement or on 3rd party resources not used at the premises of the beneficiaries
Pre-financing
: Yes, 1st pre-financing at start project for costs for preparation stage,2nd pre-financing before execution stage for costs for rest (incl. call for tender budget)
EU contribution
•
7 October 2014 - Open Days workshop 07B12 (14h30-17h00)
focusing on innovation procurement in healthcare sector
•
Presentations from THALEA (PCP) and STOP AND GO (PPI)
•
26-27 November 2014 – EU/Lombardy innovation procurement
event with networking sessions in preparation of 2015 calls
•
See
http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/innovation-procurement
•
EU assistance for ICT procurers launching PCP/PPI procurements
(contractor expected to start beginning 2015)
•
Practical toolkit and
local promotion/training
how to do PCP/PPI
•
Individual local assistance (incl. legal) to procurers that plan to
start PCP or PPI procurements across all Member States
•
New website (2014…):
http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/innovation-procurement. Previous website pre-2014 info:
cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/pcp/home_en.html
•
Info from past Info Day on:
•
Details PCP/PPI Cofund instruments
•
Possible synergies with structural funds support
•
How to prepare a proposal
•
Proposal ideas from potential proposers, etc
->
http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/news/calls-eu-funding-opportunities-pre-commercial-procurement-and-public-procurement-innovative
•
Interested to see an example of a successful proposal?
•
Contact IMAILE PCP project:
www.imaile.eu
. IMAILE agreed to
make its project proposal public as example for others.
-> Note: this is an example of a proposal according to the FP7 proposal
template (as IMAILE is an FP7 not Horizon 2020 project). H2020 proposal
template for PCP Cofund actions is similar but not 100% the same.
Synergies with Structural Funds
support
CATEGORIES OF POSSIBLE SYNERGIES
BETWEEN H2020 AND ESIF ON PCP/PPI
Joint or
simultaneous
use of funds
(H2020 and ESIF funding used in same
project to co-finance different cost items)
Sequential
funding
(ESIF funding the preparation and H2020
the execution of a PCP or PPI, or other way
around)
Additional
funding
(ESIF funding complementary activities such as skills
enhancement to use solutions purchased by a PPI funded by H2020)
Alternative
funding
(ESIF funding good quality projects that
could not be funded through due to lack of
H2020 call budget)
Joint PCP carried out in the context of a H2020 PCP Cofund action: some
procurers in the buyers group may receive co-funding from the ESIF for
their contribution to the total PCP budget and others from H2020 for
their contribution to the PCP total budget.
By using ESIF Funds, procurers from less developed Regions could
receive higher co-funding rates (up to 85%) to participate in a PCP/PPI
called for by Horizon 2020 that is implemented by/in cooperation with
procurers from more advanced Regions (up to 70% funding rate )
.
This scenario is applicable only if there is a clear distinction between budgets
offered per OP and between expenditures co-funded by the ESIF (per OP) vs
expenditures co-funded by H2020.
Possible implementation - each R&D provider is paid pro rata by each procurer in the buyers group according to the share of each procurer's contribution to the jointly committed budget for the PCP.
Condition for success : synchronization between the ESIF calls and the H2020 cofund action calls
Coordination, Preparatory etc. activities are co-funded by
H2020 (CSAs)
100% CO-FUNDING RATE
EXECUTION OF ONE JOINT PCP
Coordination, Preparatory etc. activities are co-funded by
the ESIF
DIFFERENT CO-FUNDING RATE PER PROGRAM AND/OR PARTICIPANT
OR PROCURER A (Less developed Region) CO-FUNDS HIS CONTRIBUTION TO THE JOINTLY COMMITTED BUDGET THROUGH THE
ESIF CO-FUNDING RATE up to 85% (for his contribution) PROCURER B (Transitional Region) CO-FUNDS HIS CONTRIBUTION TO THE JOINTLY COMMITTED BUDGET THROUGH THE
ESIF CO-FUNDING RATE up to 60%(for his contribution) PROCURER C CO-FUNDS HIS CONTRIBUTION TO THE JOINTLY COMMITTED BUDGET THROUGH H2020 CO-FUNDING RATE 70%(for his contribution)
PROCURERD CO-FUNDS HIS CONTRIBUTION TO THE JOINTLY COMMITTED BUDGET THROUGH H2020 CO-FUNDING RATE 70%(for his contribution)
Joint PPI carried out in the context of a H2020 PPI cofund action: One
procurer in the buyers group located in a less developed Region can be
co-funded by the ESIF (up to 85% rate) to purchase the amount of
innovative products he needs, and another procurer in another MS can
be co-funded by H2020 (20% rate) to purchase the amount of
innovative solutions he needs.
This scenario is applicable only if there is a clear distinction between budgets
offered per OP and between expenditures co-funded by the ESIF (per OP) vs
expenditures co-funded by H2020.
Implementation option 1: under a joint Framework Contract/Agreement which provides the joint
technical specifications, separate specific contracts are implemented by the procurers according to their national law for the purchase of the amount of innovative solutions they each want
Or
Implementation option 2: the lead procurer launches one procurement procedure, awards all the contracts, but every individual procurer pays the invoices for the products he buys for himself
Condition for success : synchronization between the ESIF calls and the H2020 cofund action calls
Coordination, Preparation etc. activities are co-funded by H2020
(CSA)
100% CO-FUNDING RATE
EXECUTION OF ONE JOINT PPI
PROCURER A purchases the innovative
products he needs with the support of H2020
FLAT CO-FUNDING RATE 20% (for his contribution)
PROCURER C
purchases the innovative products he needs with
the support of H2020
FLAT CO-FUNDING RATE 20% (for his contribution)
PROCURER B (Less developed Region)
purchases the innovative products he needs with the
support of the ESIF in line with the objectives of the
relevant O.P
CO-FUNDING RATE up to 85%(for his contribution)
Coordination, Preparation etc. activities are co-funded by the
ESIF
DIFFERENT CO-FUNDING RATE PER PROGRAM AND/OR PARTICIPANT
OR
PROCURER D Less developed Region purchases the innovative products he needs with the
support of the ESIF in line with the objectives of the
relevant O.P CO-FUNDING RATE up to 85%(for his contribution)
EIB loans
-50 0 50 100 150 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Gap Costs Budget
Annual Budget vs. Actual Costs
Peak Requirements/ Budget Programme
Public Sector Tranche:
Facility to finance peak & bridge
financing requirements faced
by committed partner countries
The repayment of the public sector tranche is made through budgetary commitments of partner countries over
the long term (5-30 yrs) Key Advantages:
Meet peak & bridge financing requirements
Provide contingency cover for cost overruns
RSFF (Risk Sharing Finance Facility)
For large projects (min loan amount €7,5M)
Overview current (WP2015)
Horizon 2020 calls
Supporting Innovation
Procurement
•
ICT
Work Program
(Call deadline: 14 April 2015)• ICT-24(d): Robotics in areas of public interest including healthcare (€ 5M)
• ICT-08(a): Boosting public service productivity/services via cloud computing (€ 9M)
• ICT-36: Call open to any area of public interest needing ICT based solutions (€ 4M)
•
Health
Work Program
(Call deadline: 21 April 2015)• PHC-27: Selfmanagement of health and disease and patient enpowerment supported by
ICT (€ 15M total, expected € 3-5M/proposal)
•
Security
Work Program
(Call deadline: 27 August 2015)• BES-03: Maritime border security: Light optionally piloted vehicles (and sensors) for
maritime surveillance (no predefined total budget, expected € 5-12M/proposal)
•
Research Infrastruct
Work Program
(Call deadline: 21 April 2015)• INFRASUPP-2(b): Scientific instrumentation for research infrastruct. (part of € 14M)
Calls for PCP cofund actions in 2015
•
ICT
Work Program
(Call deadline : 14 April 2015)• ICT-8(b): Boosting public service productivity/services via cloud computing (€ 12M)
• ICT-20(d): ICT technologies for better human learning and teaching (€ 9M)
• ICT-27(b): Photonics – software defined optical networking for faster broadband by public
network operators e.g. National Research and Education Networks (€ 5M)
•
Health
Work Program
(Call deadline: 21 April 2015)• PHC-29: eHealth services (€ 10M total, expected € 1-5M/proposal)
•
Transport
Work Program
(Call deadline: 15 October 2015)• MG 8.3: Transport Infrastructure (€ 13M)
•
Research Infrastruct
Work Program
(Call deadline: 21 April 2015)• INFRASUPP-2(c): Scientific instrumentation for research infrastructure (part of € 14M)
Calls for PPI cofund actions in 2015
•
Security
Work Program
(Call deadline: 27 August 2015)• BES-11: Information management, systems and infrastructure for civilian EU External Actions (€ 1-2M expected/proposal, part of large call)
• DRS-18: Interoperable next generation of broadband radio communication system for public safety and security (no predefined max budget, part of larger call)
•
Research Infrastruct
Work Program
(Call deadline: 21 April 2015)• INFRASUPP-2(a): Exploring future use of joint PCP and PPI in research infrastructure (part of € 14M call)
•
Energy
Work Program
(Call deadline: 4 June 2015)• EE-07: Enhancing the capacity of public authorities to plan, finance and implement
sustainable energy plans & policies e.g. in buildings, mobility (no max total budget, part of big call, € 1,5/2M per project expected)
• EE-17: Targeting min 25% higher-than available energy performance levels
b) Preparing and supporting procurements by large buyers groups (no max total budget, part of big call, € 1,5/2M per project)
•
ICT
Work Program
(Call deadline: 14 April 2015)• ICT-30(b): CSAs on Internet of things ecosystem / could address PCP (max € 1M, 2015)
Calls for Coordination and Support Actions in 2015
•
ICT covers
• Components and systems: embedded ICT systems, minituarisation / system integration,
advanced thin large organic and large area electronics
• Advanced computing (e.g. customised and low power computing)
• Future Internet (e.g. smart novel Internet architectures and experimentation platforms, optical and wireless network technologies, cloud computing infrastructure and services, tools and methods for software development, web entrepreneurship)
• Content technologies and information management (e.g. big data handling, content handling and modelling, automatic learning language translation systems, creative industries / social media ICTs, ICTs for learning / teaching and gaming, multimodal natural computer interaction)
• Robotics
• Micro- and nano electronics, cross-cutting ICT KETs, photonics (e.g. (O)LED lighting)
• High Performance computing
• Cybersecurity / trustworthy ICT • Human-centric ICT solutions
Quite some ICT related PCP-PPI calls
ICT is pretty wide domain
Backup Slides
New May 2014 Provisions
In public procurement directives
and State Aid Rules on R&D&I
Procurement of R&D
PPI enables
Difference PCP-PPI combination
versus Innovation Partnership procedure
Different streams to
finance industrial R&D
Deployment commercial
volumes of final end-products
200 €Bn/Y (2% GDP)
2,5 €Bn/Y (0,025% GDP)
PPI
Public procurement
market 2000 €Bn/Y
(20% GDP)
PPI
Mainstream R&D funding routes
not procurement based
PCP – PPI combination no State aid: provides equally fair access to the procurement market for companies that finance their R&D through non-procurement channels
PCP – PPI combination therefore usable in most
common situation with multiple potentially interested suppliers
Procurement of R&D
PPI enables
Difference PCP-PPI combination
versus Innovation Partnership procedure
Different streams to
finance industrial R&D
Deployment commercial
volumes of final end-products
200 €Bn/Y (2% GDP)
2,5 €Bn/Y (0,025% GDP)
PPI
Public procurement
market 2000 €Bn/Y
(20% GDP)
Innovation Partnership Procedure
Mainstream R&D funding routes
not procurement based
New IP Procedure limits access to procurement market to only the company whose R&D was financed by the innovation partnership
New IP Procedure therefore only to be used in exceptional situations of
unique / specialised products !!! (if no other potentially interested suppliers on the market)
Otherwise State aid – foreclosing competition & crowding out of mainstream R&D investments