• No results found

New York State Profile

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "New York State Profile"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

As America Becomes More Diverse:

The Impact of State Higher Education Inequality

New York State Profile

Questions You Should Ask

™

How educated is New York’s adult population and workforce?

™

How does New York compare to the national average, the most

educated states, and the most educated countries?

™

What are the disparities in educational attainment, participation and

completion in higher education, and personal income by gender and

race/ethnicity?

™

How is the demographic composition of New York expected to change?

™

How will expected changes in demography – given current disparities

in education and personal income – affect the overall educational

attainment and personal income of New York?

Prepared by the National Center for Higher Education Management

(2)

The Impact of State Higher Education Inequality

New York State Profile

Racial/Ethnic Composition of New York’s Working Age Population (Ages 25 to 64) from 1980 to 2000 6,502,440 6,587,435 6,330,812 1,063,440 1,318,353 1,434,924 766,020 1,097,875 1,457,240 18,040 25,069 29,971 176,440 392,758 616,403 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 1980 1990 2000 White African-American Hispanic/Latino

Native American/AK Native Asian/Pacific Islander

Educational Attainment of 25 to 64 Year Olds in 2000 (All Races)

17.4% 26.4% 17.9% 8.3% 17.3% 12.7% 16.1% 27.8% 22.3% 7.2% 17.1% 9.4% 22.4% 41.3% 29.9% 11.6% 23.2% 15.1% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%

Less than High School

High School/No College

Some C ollege Associates Bachelor's Graduate and Professional New York US Average Highest State

MS WV UT ND CO MA

Sources: US Census Bureau’s Public Use Microdata Samples (Based on the 1990 and 2000 Census’)

1

(3)

Disparities in Educational Attainment by Gender and Race/Ethnicity

Females Males White Females Males African-American Females Males Hispanic/Latino Females Males

Native American/AK Native

LEGEND

Females Males

Asian/Pacific Islander

Educational Attainment of 25 to 64 Year Olds (Working Age)

Percent with a Bachelor’s Degree or Higher – by Gender and Race/Ethnicity

Sources: US Census Bureau’s Public Use Microdata Samples (Based on the 1980, 1990, and 2000 Census’) Note: Associate Degree Data not Available for 1980.

Percent with an Associates Degree or Higher – by Gender and Race/Ethnicity

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 1980 1990 2000 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 1990 2000

Educational Attainment of 25 to 34 Year Olds (The Young Workforce)

2

Percent with a Bachelor’s Degree or Higher – By Gender and Race/Ethnicity

Sources: US Census Bureau’s Public Use Microdata Samples (Based on the 1980, 1990, and 2000 Census’) Note: Associate Degree Data not Available for 1980.

Percent with an Associates Degree or Higher – By Gender and Race/Ethnicity

(4)

Educational Attainment by Gender and Race/Ethnicity

(25 to 34 Year Olds Continued)

Females Males White Females Males African-American Females Males Hispanic/Latino Females Males

Native American/AK Native

LEGEND

Females Males

Asian/Pacific Islander

Educational Attainment of 25 to 34 Year Olds (The Young Workforce) Indexed to the Top Country

Indexed to the Top Country – Percent with a Bachelor’s

Degree or Higher – By Gender and Race/Ethnicity Indexed to the Top Country – Percent with an Associates Degree or Higher – By Gender and Race/Ethnicity

Sources: US Census Bureau’s Public Use Microdata Samples (Based on the 2000 Census) and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4

WM WF BM BF HM HF NAM NAF APM APF

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Top Country (Norway)

Top Country (Canada)

US Index = 0.86 US Index = 0.77

Personal Income

3

New York 122.5% 119.3% 109.0% 119.0% 117.6% 80% 90% 100% 110% 120% 130% 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 US Average

New York’s Personal Income Per Capita as a Percent of the US Average (1960 to 2000)

(5)

Higher Education Participation and Completion by Race/Ethnicity

White

LEGEND

African-American Hispanic/Latino Native American/AK Native Asian/Pacific Islander

59.2% 46.0% 37.6% 34.9% 60.1% 54.3% 22.4% 22.7% 19.0% 18.6% 31.8% 29.1% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Representation (%) of Race/Ethnic Groups at Each Stage of the Education Pipeline (2002)

Difference in the Percentage of Credentials Awarded and the Percentage of 18 Year Olds by Race/Ethnicity (2002)

Graduation Rates by Race/Ethnicity (2002)

Sources: US Census Bureau (18 Year Olds), Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (HS Graduates), and the National Center for Education Statistics (College Participation and Completion)

Source: National Center for Education Statistics (IPEDS Graduation Rate Survey)

Actual vs. Parity Three-Year Graduation Rates for Associate Students

Six-Year Graduation Rates for Bachelor’s Students US Average US Average 58% 67% 63% 61% 64% 67% 65% 17% 14% 14% 16% 15% 11% 12% 18% 11% 12% 12% 12% 9% 8% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 6% 7% 7% 7% 5% 8% 7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

18 Year Olds High School Graduates First-Time Freshmen All Other Undergraduates Associate Degrees Awarded Bachelor's Degrees Awarded All Credentials and Degrees Awarded 1.3% -0.1% -9.1% -5.6% 7.0% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10%

Sources: US Census Bureau (18 Year Olds), Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (HS Graduates), and the National Center for Education Statistics (College Participation and Completion)

4

(6)

The Impact of Changing Demographics on Educational Attainment and

Personal Income (2000 to 2020)

Projected changes in educational attainment and personal income per capita are based on the US Census Bureau’s population projections by age and race/ethnicity and 2000 educational attainment and personal income data by age and race/ethnicity. The analyses are designed to help answer the following question: “Given current disparities in educational attainment and personal income by age and race/ethnicity, how will the changing demographics in my state impact the overall educational attainment and personal income of the adult population?”

6,330,812 5,692,153 1,434,924 1,512,909 1,457,240 2,000,794 29,971 35,118 616,403 970,659 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 2000 2020 2000 2020 2000 2020 2000 2020 2000 2020 Projected Change in 25 to 64 Year Olds by Race/Ethnicity (from 2000 to 2020)

White

African-American Hispanic/Latino

Native American/AK Native Asian/Pacific Islander

Changes in Educational Attainment as a Result of the Projected Changes In Race/Ethnicity (25 to 64 Year Olds from 2000 to 2020)

17.1% 19.2% 26.4% 25.9% 18.0% 17.7% 8.3% 8.0% 17.3% 16.9% 12.9% 12.4% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 2000 2020 2000 2020 2000 2020 2000 2020 2000 2020 2000 2020

Less than High School High School

Some College

Associates Bachelor’s

Graduate/Professional

Sources: US Census Bureau’s Population Projections (from 1995 to 2025) and Census 2000

5

(7)

The Impact of Changing Demographics on Educational Attainment and

Personal Income (2000 to 2020) - Continued

$ 23,404 $ 22,222 $ 21,591 $ 21,196 $ 28,869 $ 27,813 $0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 2000 2020 271,109 41,184 23,007 -7,652 10,727 -10,045 -50,000 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000

Change in Per Capita Personal Income from 2000 to 2020 (In 2000 $)

Top State New York

Number Change in Adults 25 to 64 by Degree Level from 2000 to 2020

US Average Less than High School

High School Some College Associates Bachelor’s

Graduate/Professional

Source: US Census Bureau’s Population Projections and Census 2000 Source: US Census Bureau’s Population Projections and Census 2000

If Hispanics/Latinos, African-Americans, and Native Americans

achieved the same levels of education as Whites by 2020, New York’s

personal income would increase by $24.3 Billion (in 2000 $).

Note: Does not account for racial/ethnic disparities in personal earnings for the same levels of education.

6

(8)

The Impact of State Higher Education Inequality

New York Summary

™ All minority populations grew in New York from 1980 to 2000 – with the majority

of growth among Hispanics and Asians. The White population declined over the two decades. The same trends are expected from 2000 to 2020.

™ The workforce has slightly more college degrees than the nation as a whole and

substantially less than the most educated states. A relatively high percentage of 25 to 64 year olds (17%) have less than a high school education and 16 percent of the younger population – ages 25 to 34 – have less than a high school diploma.

™ Females have made progress in educational attainment relative to males but

sizable disparities still exist among racial/ethnic populations. The difference between the two largest populations (White and Hispanic) is among the largest of any state. Only 18 percent of Hispanics have attained college degrees – compared to 45 percent of Whites.

™ Only Asians and Whites exceed the most educated country in the percentage of

adults (ages 25 to 34) with a bachelor’s degree and the percentage with a college degree (associate and higher) – which is an important consideration in an

increasingly global economy.

™ New York’s personal income per capita has fallen slightly from 123 percent of the

U.S. average in 1960 to 118 percent in 2000.

™ The education system in New York (from high school to college completion) fails to

retain Hispanics and African-Americans at nearly the rate of Whites. These racial/ethnic disparities are also evident in the graduation rates of associate and baccalaureate students.

™ Unless these inequities are addressed, current disparities in educational attainment

and the population projections by race/ethnicity indicate that New York will lose ground in the percentage of its workforce that is college-educated. Nearly all of the growth will occur in the “less than high school” population.

™ A similar trend is projected for personal income. New York’s personal income per

capita will decline relative to other states which will also have a negative impact on the tax base and its ability to provide services to its citizens – namely higher education.

Prepared by the National Center for Higher Education Management

Systems with Support from the Lumina Foundation for Education

7

References

Related documents

The analysis demonstrates that pairwise forward trading serves the desirable purpose of ruling out that the spot market is a bilateral oligopoly market (with both seller and

99 (2011) (documenting systematic imbalance of participation and influence by regulated industry throughout the rulemaking process). Studies before and after the advent of

The Government’s 2007 decision to repeal section 67 of the Human Rights Act, which had shielded from scrutiny many actions taken by First Nations governments or the Federal

With regard to how catalogers view their work, the findings show that the majority of both professional and paraprofes- sional catalogers feel that paraprofessionals can and should

We report here on a study examining the impact of KP HealthConnect implementation on nursing care process and outcome measures across Kaiser Permanente hospitals in Northern

In the present study, by taking advantage of three differ- ent cohorts of in vivo ibrutinib-treated CLL and of a series of ibrutinib-naive primary CLL samples, we demonstrate that (1)

The paper presents the results of an analysis conducted at the level of the Romanian military higher education institutions, in order to explore the characteristics of their

Poverty, lack of opportunities and problems of psychological adaptation: this overlapping of issues is identified to a part of the population displaced by the urban space, which fails