• No results found

One example: Michelson interferometer

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "One example: Michelson interferometer"

Copied!
24
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

object (n ⇒∆object) beam splitter

light source

mirror 1

mirror 2

3.5.4.2 One example: Michelson interferometer

interference pattern 1 2 3 4

we either observe fringes of same thickness (parallel light) or fringes of same inclination (divergent light)

(2)

3.5.5 Reflection and refraction from wave optics: 3.5.5.1 Reflection n1 n2 A'B' = AB ⇒ ε = ε' ⇒ α = α' α A A' ε α' ε' •B B'

(3)

3.5.5 Reflection and refraction from wave optics: 3.5.5.2 Refraction: Snellius law

n1 n2 n1A'B' = n2AB ⇒ n1/ n2 = AB/A'B' A'B'/AB' = sin αα AB/AB' = sin ββ ⇒ sin αα / sin ββ = n2/ n1 α A A' B' B • β β α

(4)

3.5.6 Interference of reflected beams

3.5.6.1 On a glass plate – or on a dielectric film

n1 n2 d B' B • • A' • • α β α C A β β β ∆∆ = 2 BC = 2 dn2 cosβ

(5)

3.5.6.1 (alternative 'rays') Interference of reflected beams n1 n2 d C B B' α β β • • A A' α β β • • ∆∆ = 2 BC = 2 dn2 cosβ

(6)

3.5.6.2 Anti reflective coating

substrate

high index of refraction nh

low index of refraction nl

nh nl nh nl λ/(4nh) λ/(4nl)

(7)

x x x

3.5.7 Young‘s double slit experiment (introduction)

Thomas Young 1802

s

incident plane wave

z g r1 r2 α ∆ ∆ =r2-r1=g sin α maxima: sinαmax = mλ/g m=0, ±1,±2,±3 x

(8)

3.5.8 Fresnel and Fraunhofer Diffraction

3.5.8.1 Fresnel: divergent light (near field interference)

incident plane wave

blue: ∆ = (2m+1) λ/2 red: ∆ = m λ

example: double slit

minima maxima

(9)

3.5.8 Fresnel and Fraunhofer diffraction

3.5.8.2 Fraunhofer: parallel light (far field interference)

incident plane wave example: double slit

diffracting object

lens

focusses all parallel

rays onto screen (Fraunhofer)

screen

f

but typically: the diffracting object or a defining aperture is focussed onto screen

(10)

3.5.9 Fraunhofer diffraction on a single slit

α

∆ = b sin α

incident plane wave

lens f z x a b

(11)

dEP J dE0 expßiÝgt ? krÞà/kr¶

3.5.9 Fraunhofer diffraction on a single slits and apertures 3.5.9.1 Single slit

∆ = b sin α

incident plane wave

lens f r x a b α P -b/2 +b/2 dx x r ES with A = xsinJ EP =ES b/2 ?b/2

X

expÝ?ikAÞ dx=ES

b/2

?b/2

X

expÝ?ikxsinJÞ dx substitute ksinJ = u

=ES expÝ?iuxÞ

iu ?b/2

b/2

= ES expÝiub/2Þ?expÝ?iub/2Þ

iub/2 b/2 = ESb sinub/2 ub/2 =ES b sinc ub 2 = ESb sinc bksinJ 2

sinc function (slit function): FÝKÞ = sincÝKÞ = sinÝKÞ/K

dE0 = ÝEs/bÞdx¶

(12)

3.5.9 Fraunhofer diffraction on a single slits and apertures 3.5.9.1 Single slit cont. – sinc function

I/I0 E/E0 -π -2π -3π π 2π 3π electrical field EP 9 sincÝKÞ with K = kbsinJ 2 = ^b V sinJ

minima for K = m^ ì sinJ = m V

b with m=±1, ±2, ±3 ...

diffraction intensity I = I0sinc2ÝKÞ

(13)

3.5.9 Fraunhofer diffraction on a single slits and apertures 3.5.9.2 Circular aperture (dia. D) - Airyfunction

-0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 I0 x = DV sinJ

first minimum: sinJ = 1. 22 V

D

Airyfunction: IÝLÞ = I0 2L J1ÝLÞ 2

with L = 1

(14)

αmin

3.5.10 Resolution of optical instruments

Rayleigh criterium: sinJmin = 1. 22 V

(15)

incident plane wave

3.5.11 Fraunhofer diffraction on a grating 3.5.11.1 Schematic ∆=g sinα ∆j = (j-1) g sinα maxima for ∆ = m λ i=1 2 ∆ α α 3 g b δ = (2πg/λ) sinα δj =(j-1)(2πg/λ) sinα ∆3

(16)

3.5.11.2 Interference on grating - evaluated N = Ý2^g/VÞsinJ Nj = Ýj ? 1ÞÝ2^g/VÞsinJ EÝsinJÞ = j=1 N

>

exp ?iNj = sinsinÝNN/2ÞÝN/2Þ = sinÝ^NgV?1 sinJÞ

sinÝ^gV?1 sinJÞ

but: we have to take slit function into account: FÝ^bsinJÞ

I = sinÝNN/2Þ sinÝN/2Þ 2 I = sinÝNN/2Þ sinÝN/2Þ 2 F2Ý ^bV sinJÞ = sin2N^ g V sinJ sin2^g V sinJ sinc2Ý^ bV sinJÞ

peak intensity increases with N2

(17)

3.5.11.3 Diffraction from double slit – folded with single slit

x

x

cos2(x) sinc2(x)

(18)

3.5.11.4 Diffraction from a grating –

with single slit folded in (bottom)

x

N=5, b=0.2g

x

N=20, b = 0.5g N=20, b = 0.2g

(19)

3.5.11.5 Summary: diffraction - double slit and grating N=5 b<<g N=2 N=30 b=0.3g double slit I = F2I0 cosÝ^ gV sinJÞ

grating with N (illuminated) slits grating constant (slit distance) g grating function:

G2 = sin2ÝN^ gV sinJÞ/sin2Ý^ gV sinJÞ

overall intensity from grating I = I0F2G2

(20)

3.5.11.6 Resolution of grating

λλ λλ‘

Intensity distribution for grating diffraction N=number of slits illuminated coherently g=slit distance, b=slit width

α= oberserved angle m=0 1 2 3 4 order of diffraction I = sin 2N^ g V sinJ sin2^g V sinJ sinc2Ý^ bV sinJÞ

main maxima when denominator = 0 ì sinJmax = m gV (where N^ gV sinJmax = ^NmÞ

adjacent minima for nominator = 0 ì ^N gV sinJmin = ^ÝNm + nÞ

(21)

3.5.11.6 Resolution of grating cont.

λλ λλ‘

maximum at Vv = V + AV changes to first adjacent minimum at V :

wavelengths V and Vvcan be distinguished when

gsinJmaxv = mÝV + AVÞ ! = mV + 1

N V

gsinJmax = mV and gsinJmin = mV + Nn V

(22)

3.5.12 Coherence of electromagnetic waves 3.5.12.1 Longitudinal (temporal) coherence

interference of waves with finite

„coherence“ length (duration τ) l=c τ

l Imax Imin 2I0 4I0

contrast: (Imax-Imin)/(Imax+Imin) → 0 for ∆>>l l ~ c/δν

(23)

3.5.12.2 Lateral (spatial) coherence

extended radiation source: „coherence“-width each photon interferes only with itself!

but: interference patterns from different parts of the source may cancel

s α α α ∆s= sα interference setup 1 2 3 4 Imax Imin 2I0 4I0 ∆ 3+4 1+2 coherence for ∆s= s α < λ

(24)

3.5.13 Michelsons stellar interferometer s=1.22(λ / α) α=d/r s d α r interference pattern

Important application of lateral coherence:

References

Related documents

• Storage node - node that runs Account, Container, and Object services • ring - a set of mappings of OpenStack Object Storage data to physical devices To increase reliability, you

The algorithm will only match applicants employers preferred for NESP positions to NESP positions and applicants employers preferred for NETP positions to NETP positions. This way

Customer to pay any amount within ten (10) days after the amount is due and payable, b) abuse of the System or the equipment, c) dissolution, termination, discontinuance,

3) Resource Allocation: A well known wired virtual net- work problem is how to embed a virtual network in a physical network (i.e., what nodes, links, and resources should be picked

8 Attebery, like Irwin, distinguishes between the fantastic and fantasy: the fantastic as a mode of storytelling incorporates the whole of myth, fairy tale, magic realism,

There are different Session Key Exchange methods / algorithms Like Diffie-Hellman, Secure Hill Cipher Modifications and Key Exchange Protocol, Integration of

Local government agencies, or non-profit organizations yes Support public access sites yes Provide computer, software and Internet training yes A Community

The Seckford Education Trust and our schools should be environments in which pupils and students or their parents/carers can feel comfortable and confident