• No results found

Bioequivalence Study Design Considerations. Dr. John Gordon

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Bioequivalence Study Design Considerations. Dr. John Gordon"

Copied!
26
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Bioequivalence

Study Design Considerations

Dr. John Gordon

(2)

Key Output of Programme Key Output of Programme

 A list of prequalified medicinal products used for

treatment of HIV/AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, influenza, and for reproductive health

 To get a product included on the list, a manufacturer

provides a comprehensive set of data about the quality, safety and efficacy of its product

 For most products (multisource or generic), this data set will include the results of in vivo bioequivalence tests

(clinical trials conducted in healthy volunteers) as

evidence of safety and efficacy

(3)

Bioequivalence Bioequivalence

Reference Test

Pharmaceutical Equivalent Products

Possible Differences Drug particle size, ..

Excipients

Manufacturing process Equipment

Site of manufacture Batch size ….

(4)

Guidance Guidance

“Multisource (generic)

pharmaceutical products:

guidelines on registration requirements to establish

interchangeability". In: Fortieth report of the WHO Expert

Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations.

Geneva, World Health

Organization. WHO Technical Report Series, No. 937, 2006, Annex 7

(5)

Establishing Bioequivalence Establishing Bioequivalence

 Comparative pharmacokinetic studies

In vivo comparative bioavailability studies

Comparison of performance of products based rate and extent of absorption of drug substance from each formulation

Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)

Maximal concentration (Cmax)

Time to maximal concentration (Tmax)

 Comparative pharmacodynamic studies

 Comparative clinical trials

 Comparative in vitro methods

(6)

BCS-based Biowaiver BCS-based Biowaiver

 Eligibility for BCS-based Biowaiver

– General Notes on Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS)-based Biowaiver Applications

 Requirements for BCS-based Biowaiver

– General Notes on BCS-based Biowaiver Applications – Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS)-based

Biowaiver Applications: Anti-Tuberculosis Medicines

(7)

In vivo BE Study Design

In vivo BE Study Design

Products being tested

 Comparator product

– WHO provides recommendations – To be discussed by Dr. Welink

 Test product

– Biobatch of sufficient size

– Consistent with product proposed for market

(8)

In vivo BE Study Design

In vivo BE Study Design

 Single-dose administration

 Multiple-dose administration

(9)

In vivo BE Study Design

In vivo BE Study Design

 Crossover Design

– Each subject administered both test and comparator – Within-subject comparison

– Preferred

 Parallel Design

– Each subject administered test or comparator – Between-subject comparison

– Only recommended for extremely long half-life drugs – Consult WHO

(10)

Crossover Design Crossover Design

 Blood samples are collected and assayed

Before and several times after drug administration. No need after 72 h

 Prior to period 2, pre-dose levels must be <5% of Cmax of 2nd period

 Wash out period must take into account the slow metabolizers

 Minimum wash out: 7 days (1 week)

Period 1 Wash out Period 2

(11)

In vivo BE Study Design

In vivo BE Study Design

 Crossover Design

– Each subject administered both test and comparator – Within-subject comparison

– Preferred

 Parallel Design

– Each subject administered test or comparator – Between-subject comparison

– Only recommended for extremely long half-life drugs – Consult WHO

(12)

Drugs with long elimination t 1/2 : Parallel Drugs with long elimination t 1/2 : Parallel

 Normally wash-out period should not exceed 3-4 weeks

 If a larger wash-out period is necessary a parallel design may be more appropriate

 Variability will be larger, needs higher sample size

Parallel design: Total variability (intra+inter)

Cross-over: Intra-subject variability

 Sampling: Up to 72 h

Group 2: Treatment B Group 1: Treatment A

Randomization to treatments

(13)

In vivo BE Study Design

In vivo BE Study Design

 Administration of products under fasted or fed conditions?

 Fasted conditions

– Study conducted under fasted conditions the norm – Comparator product labeling (SPC)

• Specifies fasted conditions

• Does not specify fasted/fed for administration

• States that either fasted or fed administration

 Fed conditions

(14)

In vivo BE Study Design

In vivo BE Study Design

Administration of products under fasted or fed conditions?

 Fed conditions

– If specified in comparator product labeling (SPC) – Type of meal to be consumed

• high-fat, high-calorie meal

• “standard” or typical breakfast

 Administration under both fasted and fed conditions

– Not generally necessary for immediate-release products – Required for modified-release products

(15)

Examples

HIV/AIDS Medicines Examples

HIV/AIDS Medicines

 Nucleoside/Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

– Lamivudine

• Administration with respect to (wrt) food not specified

• Fasted – Stavudine

• Maybe taken with or without food

• Fasted – Zidovudine

• Administration with respect to (wrt) food not specified

(16)

Examples

HIV/AIDS Medicines Examples

HIV/AIDS Medicines

 Nucleoside/Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

– Didanosine (enteric-coated)

• Delayed-release formulation

Two studies required: Fasted and fed conditions – Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate

• US labeling of comparator: “The dose is one 300 mg tablet once daily taken orally, without regard to food.”

• European labeling of comparator: “…(one tablet) once daily taken orally with food.”

• Either accepted

(17)

Examples

HIV/AIDS Medicines Examples

HIV/AIDS Medicines

 Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

– Efavirenz

• Fed administration increases bioavailability but also increases adverse events

• Comparator labeling recommends administration on an empty stomach

• Fasted – Nevirapine

• Administration with respect to (wrt) food not specified

• Fasted

(18)

Examples

HIV/AIDS Medicines Examples

HIV/AIDS Medicines

 Protease Inhibitors

– Atazanavir

• Administration with food increases bioavailability and decreases variability

• Fed – Ritonavir

• Administration with food improves absorption

• Fed

– Atazanavir / ritonavir combination

• Fed

• Standard breakfast

(19)

Examples

Tuberculosis Medicines Examples

Tuberculosis Medicines

 First-line treatments

– Ethambutol

• Administration not affected by food

• Fasted – Isoniazid

• Administration on an empty stomach

• Fasted

– Pyrazinamide

• Administration preferably without food

(20)

Examples

Tuberculosis Medicines Examples

Tuberculosis Medicines

 First-line treatments

– Rifampicin

• “It is recommended that oral rifampin be administered once daily, either 1 hour before or 2 hours after a meal with a full glass of water.”

• Fasted

 Second-line treatments

– Cycloserine

• Maybe taken with or without food

• Fasted

(21)

Examples

Tuberculosis Medicines Examples

Tuberculosis Medicines

 Second-line treatments

– Levofloxacin

• Administration with respect to (wrt) food not specified

• Fasted

• Eligible for BCS-based biowaiver – Ofloxacin

• “…should not be taken within two hours of magnesium/aluminium containing antacids, sucralfate, zinc or iron preparations…”

• Administration with respect to (wrt) food not specified

(22)

Examples

Malaria Medicines Examples

Malaria Medicines

 Artemisinin-based fixed dose oral combination formulations

 Artemether + Lumefantrine

– Artemether

• Bioavailability increased when taken with food (x2) – Lumefantrine

• Bioavailability increased when taken with food – x16 increase with high fat meal

– x2 increase with lower fat meal

– Fed conditions (“standard” breakfast)

(23)

Examples

Malaria Medicines Examples

Malaria Medicines

 Artemisinin-based fixed dose oral combination formulations

 Artesunate + Amodiaquine

– Artesunate

• Bioavailability decreased when taken with food – Amodiaquine

• Bioavailability increased when taken with high fat meal

– Labeling states “should not be taken with a high-fat meal”

(24)

Examples

Malaria Medicines Examples

Malaria Medicines

 Artemisinin-based fixed dose oral combination or co- blister formulations

 Artesunate + Mefloquine

– Artesunate

• Bioavailability decreased when taken with food – Mefloquine

• Bioavailability increased when taken with food (40%)

• Labeling states “Should not be taken on an empty stomach”

– Fed

– “Standard” breakfast, not high-fat meal

(25)

Examples

Reproductive Health Medicines Examples

Reproductive Health Medicines

 Oral hormonal contraceptives

 Ethinyl estradiol + levonorgestrel

– Administration with respect to (wrt) food not specified – Fasted

(26)

Typical Design Typical Design

 Single-dose administration

 Cross-over (within-subject) comparison

 Administration with or without food

– Fasted study is the norm

– Labeling of the comparator product is the guide

• Bioavailability / pharmacokinetics

• Adverse events

 Consultation with Programme encouraged

References

Related documents

Fig 10 and Fig 12 shows the output Line and phase voltages of eleven level CMLI and Fig 11 and Fig 13 shows the corresponding FFT analysis, with modulation index M=1 and

The incidence of respiratory failure, autonomic dysfunction and muscle atrophy in post-surgical GBS patients was signi fi cantly higher than that in non-surgical GBS patients..

therapies but in present study vatada taila (almond oil) has been taken as a trial drug in the ). The present study is an effort towards elimination of the disease.. shoulder)

In both induction and synchronous motors, the AC power supplied to the motor's stator creates a magnetic field that rotates in time with the AC

Thus the aims of this study were 1) to compare the effi- cacy and safety of combination of SOF-based therapies in a real-life cohort, including CHC patients with advanced fibrosis

CFP Board’s financial planning subject areas include insurance planning and risk management, employee benefits planning, investment planning, income tax planning,

The empirical evidence, reviewed selectively here, suggests that communication can move financial markets, enhance the predictability of monetary policy decisions, and perhaps