• No results found

Adamantane 1,2 diol

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Adamantane 1,2 diol"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

organic papers

Acta Cryst.(2006). E62, o1139–o1140 doi:10.1107/S1600536806003734 Myintet al. C

10H16O2

o1139

Acta Crystallographica Section E

Structure Reports Online

ISSN 1600-5368

Adamantane-1,2-diol

Mo Aung Myint, Jason R. Price* and Eng Wui Tan

Department of Chemistry, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand

Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Key indicators

Single-crystal X-ray study T= 83 K

Mean(C–C) = 0.002 A˚ Rfactor = 0.061 wRfactor = 0.176

Data-to-parameter ratio = 26.1

For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.

Received 25 January 2006 Accepted 31 January 2006

#2006 International Union of Crystallography

All rights reserved

In the crystal structure of the title compound, C10H16O2, the

hydroxyl groups are involved in both intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonding. Molecules are arranged in discrete layers

propagated by a network of O—H O hydrogen-bonding

interactions. The asymmetric unit comprises one chiral molecule but the presence of a crystallographic centre of inversion leads to racemic crystals.

Comment

Being a rigid cage-like molecule with two substituents which are capable of hydrogen bonding, adamantane-1,2-diol, (I), promises to be an interesting candidate as a template for molecular imprinting. There is a chiral centre at position C-2; however, the title compound crystallizes as the racemate.

The molecular structure of (I) is illustrated in Fig. 1. In the

[image:1.610.300.361.358.428.2] [image:1.610.240.419.487.717.2]

molecule, there is an intramolecular hydrogen bond

Figure 1

(2)

[O2 O1 = 2.8688 (15) A˚ ]. In the crystal structure (Fig. 2), molecules are arranged in discrete two-dimensional layers that lie parallel to the crystallographic ac plane. Intermolecular hydrogen-bonding interactions (Table 1) form a two-dimen-sional scaffold supporting bilayers of molecules of (I).

Experimental

Adamantane-1,2-diol was synthesized via a four-step synthesis according to the methods of McKerveyet al.(1971) and Janjatovicet al.(1980). After repeated recrystallization from methanol at room temperature, colourless block-shaped crystals of (I) were obtained.

Crystal data

C10H16O2

Mr= 168.23

Orthorhombic,Pccn a= 9.6159 (3) A˚

b= 20.6781 (7) A˚

c= 8.3921 (2) A˚

V= 1668.67 (9) A˚3

Z= 8

Dx= 1.339 Mg m

3

MoKradiation Cell parameters from 2252

reflections

= 3.4–32.6 = 0.09 mm1

T= 83 (2) K Block, colourless 0.360.240.10 mm

Data collection

Bruker Kappa-APEX-II area-detector diffractometer

’and!scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2004)

Tmin= 0.684,Tmax= 1.000

41081 measured reflections

2845 independent reflections 2252 reflections withI> 2(I)

Rint= 0.059

max= 32.7

h=13!13

k=30!31

l=11!12

Refinement

Refinement onF2

R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.061

wR(F2) = 0.176

S= 1.03 2845 reflections 109 parameters

H-atom parameters constrained

w= 1/[2(F

o2) + (0.0791P)2

+ 1.9937P]

whereP= (Fo2+ 2Fc2)/3

(/)max= 0.001

max= 0.84 e A˚

3

min=0.37 e A˚

3

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (A˚ ,).

D—H A D—H H A D A D—H A

O2—H2A O1 0.84 2.45 2.8688 (15) 112 O1—H1A O2i 0.84 2.02 2.8625 (15) 176 O2—H2A O1ii

0.84 2.10 2.8633 (14) 152

Symmetry codes: (i)x1

2;yþ1;zþ 1

2; (ii)x;yþ1;z.

H atoms were included in idealized positions and refined using a riding model, with tertiary and secondary C—H bond lengths fixed at 0.99 and 1.00 A˚ , respectively, and the O—H bonds fixed at 0.84 A˚.

Uiso(H) values were fixed at 1.2Ueqof the parent C and O atoms.

Data collection:APEXII(Bruker 2004); cell refinement:APEXII

andSAINT(Bruker 2004); data reduction:SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure:SHELXS97(Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure:SHELXL97(Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics:

ORTEP-3(Farrugia, 1997) and POV-RAY (Persistence of Vision, 2004); software used to prepare material for publication: enCIFer

(Allenet al., 2004).

The authors thank Fonterra Co-operative Group and the New Zealand Foundation for Research Science and Tech-nology for their support. Assistance from Professor Sally A. Brooker and Professor Jim Simpson, University of Otago, is also appreciated.

References

Allen, F. H., Johnson, O., Shields, G. P., Smith, B. R. & Towler, M. (2004).J. Appl. Cryst.37, 335–338.

Bruker (2004). APEXII (Version 1.017), SAINT (Version 7.12A) and

SADABS(Version 2004/1). Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Farrugia, L. J. (1997).J. Appl. Cryst.30, 565.

Janjatovic, J. & Majerski, Z. (1980).J. Org. Chem.45, 4892–4898.

McKervey, M. A., Cuddy, B. D. & Grant, D. (1971).J. Chem. Soc. C,19, 3173– 3179.

Persistence of Vision (2004).POV-RAY. Version 3.6. Persistence of Vision Pty. Ltd, Williamstown, Victoria, Australia.

[image:2.610.315.564.70.189.2] [image:2.610.314.565.250.404.2]

Sheldrick, G. M. (1997).SHELXL97. University of Go¨ttingen, Germany.

Figure 2

Crystal packing diagram of (I), viewed along theaaxis. Key: C grey, H white and O red. Hydrogen bonds are shown as green dashed lines (H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonding have been omitted for clarity). The molecules are arranged in layers parallel to theacplane.

Figure 3

(3)

supporting information

sup-1 Acta Cryst. (2006). E62, o1139–o1140

supporting information

Acta Cryst. (2006). E62, o1139–o1140 [https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536806003734]

Adamantane-1,2-diol

Mo Aung Myint, Jason R. Price and Eng Wui Tan

adamantane-1,2-diol

Crystal data

C10H16O2 Mr = 168.23

Orthorhombic, Pccn

Hall symbol: -P 2ab 2ac

a = 9.6159 (3) Å

b = 20.6781 (7) Å

c = 8.3921 (2) Å

V = 1668.67 (9) Å3 Z = 8

F(000) = 736

Dx = 1.339 Mg m−3

Mo radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å Cell parameters from 2252 reflections

θ = 3.4–32.6°

µ = 0.09 mm−1 T = 83 K Block, colourless 0.36 × 0.24 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Bruker Kappa-APEX-II area-detector diffractometer

Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Graphite monochromator

φ and ω scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2004)

Tmin = 0.684, Tmax = 1.000

41081 measured reflections 2845 independent reflections 2252 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

Rint = 0.059

θmax = 32.7°, θmin = 2.0° h = −13→13

k = −30→31

l = −11→12

Refinement

Refinement on F2

Least-squares matrix: full

R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.061 wR(F2) = 0.176 S = 1.03 2845 reflections 109 parameters 0 restraints

Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods

Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites

H-atom parameters constrained

w = 1/[σ2(F

o2) + (0.0791P)2 + 1.9937P]

where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

(Δ/σ)max = 0.001

Δρmax = 0.84 e Å−3

Δρmin = −0.37 e Å−3

Special details

(4)

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2,

conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used

only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2

are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq

O1 −0.13529 (11) 0.53630 (5) 0.09461 (12) 0.0133 (2)

H1A −0.2032 0.5204 0.1438 0.020*

O2 0.13649 (12) 0.51341 (5) 0.22384 (13) 0.0182 (3)

H2A 0.1086 0.5052 0.1312 0.027*

C1 −0.06880 (14) 0.58392 (6) 0.19276 (15) 0.0095 (2)

C2 0.03234 (15) 0.55025 (7) 0.30695 (16) 0.0134 (3)

H2B −0.0214 0.5206 0.3782 0.016*

C3 0.10813 (15) 0.60078 (7) 0.41011 (16) 0.0146 (3)

H3A 0.1749 0.5786 0.4833 0.017*

C4 0.18742 (16) 0.64722 (8) 0.30032 (18) 0.0173 (3)

H4A 0.2563 0.6227 0.2367 0.021*

H4B 0.2382 0.6795 0.3653 0.021*

C5 0.08549 (16) 0.68195 (7) 0.18849 (17) 0.0163 (3)

H5A 0.1376 0.7126 0.1184 0.020*

C6 −0.02213 (17) 0.71906 (7) 0.28638 (18) 0.0179 (3)

H6A −0.0885 0.7409 0.2140 0.021*

H6B 0.0250 0.7526 0.3509 0.021*

C7 −0.10082 (15) 0.67278 (7) 0.39624 (17) 0.0144 (3)

H7A −0.1707 0.6974 0.4604 0.017*

C8 0.00006 (16) 0.63765 (7) 0.50756 (17) 0.0155 (3)

H8A 0.0472 0.6694 0.5773 0.019*

H8B −0.0520 0.6071 0.5760 0.019*

C9 0.01004 (15) 0.63076 (7) 0.08472 (16) 0.0148 (3)

H9A −0.0558 0.6524 0.0114 0.018*

H9B 0.0788 0.6067 0.0199 0.018*

C10 −0.17528 (15) 0.62165 (7) 0.29281 (17) 0.0140 (3)

H10A −0.2271 0.5914 0.3622 0.017*

H10B −0.2428 0.6432 0.2214 0.017*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23

(5)

supporting information

sup-3 Acta Cryst. (2006). E62, o1139–o1140

C7 0.0134 (6) 0.0161 (6) 0.0136 (6) 0.0034 (5) 0.0010 (5) −0.0005 (5) C8 0.0161 (6) 0.0187 (6) 0.0117 (6) 0.0029 (5) 0.0009 (5) −0.0006 (5) C9 0.0152 (6) 0.0186 (6) 0.0104 (6) −0.0024 (5) 0.0000 (5) 0.0020 (5) C10 0.0115 (6) 0.0172 (6) 0.0133 (6) 0.0004 (5) 0.0003 (5) −0.0016 (5)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

O1—C1 1.4343 (15) C5—C6 1.528 (2)

O1—H1A 0.8400 C5—C9 1.551 (2)

O2—C2 1.4387 (17) C5—H5A 1.0000

O2—H2A 0.8400 C6—C7 1.529 (2)

C1—C9 1.5279 (18) C6—H6A 0.9900

C1—C2 1.5327 (19) C6—H6B 0.9900

C1—C10 1.5369 (19) C7—C8 1.530 (2)

C2—C3 1.540 (2) C7—C10 1.544 (2)

C2—H2B 1.0000 C7—H7A 1.0000

C3—C8 1.526 (2) C8—H8A 0.9900

C3—C4 1.534 (2) C8—H8B 0.9900

C3—H3A 1.0000 C9—H9A 0.9900

C4—C5 1.535 (2) C9—H9B 0.9900

C4—H4A 0.9900 C10—H10A 0.9900

C4—H4B 0.9900 C10—H10B 0.9900

C1—O1—H1A 109.5 C9—C5—H5A 109.7

C2—O2—H2A 109.5 C5—C6—C7 110.18 (12)

O1—C1—C9 108.40 (10) C5—C6—H6A 109.6

O1—C1—C2 109.27 (10) C7—C6—H6A 109.6

C9—C1—C2 110.13 (11) C5—C6—H6B 109.6

O1—C1—C10 111.43 (11) C7—C6—H6B 109.6

C9—C1—C10 109.45 (11) H6A—C6—H6B 108.1

C2—C1—C10 108.17 (10) C6—C7—C8 110.58 (12)

O2—C2—C1 112.28 (10) C6—C7—C10 108.60 (12)

O2—C2—C3 107.60 (11) C8—C7—C10 108.19 (11)

C1—C2—C3 110.09 (11) C6—C7—H7A 109.8

O2—C2—H2B 108.9 C8—C7—H7A 109.8

C1—C2—H2B 108.9 C10—C7—H7A 109.8

C3—C2—H2B 108.9 C3—C8—C7 109.98 (11)

C8—C3—C4 110.34 (12) C3—C8—H8A 109.7

C8—C3—C2 108.53 (12) C7—C8—H8A 109.7

C4—C3—C2 108.80 (11) C3—C8—H8B 109.7

C8—C3—H3A 109.7 C7—C8—H8B 109.7

C4—C3—H3A 109.7 H8A—C8—H8B 108.2

C2—C3—H3A 109.7 C1—C9—C5 109.36 (11)

C3—C4—C5 110.04 (12) C1—C9—H9A 109.8

C3—C4—H4A 109.7 C5—C9—H9A 109.8

C5—C4—H4A 109.7 C1—C9—H9B 109.8

C3—C4—H4B 109.7 C5—C9—H9B 109.8

(6)

H4A—C4—H4B 108.2 C1—C10—C7 110.23 (11)

C6—C5—C4 109.80 (12) C1—C10—H10A 109.6

C6—C5—C9 109.14 (12) C7—C10—H10A 109.6

C4—C5—C9 108.82 (12) C1—C10—H10B 109.6

C6—C5—H5A 109.7 C7—C10—H10B 109.6

C4—C5—H5A 109.7 H10A—C10—H10B 108.1

O1—C1—C2—O2 58.47 (14) C5—C6—C7—C8 58.37 (15)

C9—C1—C2—O2 −60.49 (14) C5—C6—C7—C10 −60.20 (15)

C10—C1—C2—O2 179.94 (11) C4—C3—C8—C7 57.96 (15)

O1—C1—C2—C3 178.32 (11) C2—C3—C8—C7 −61.17 (15)

C9—C1—C2—C3 59.36 (14) C6—C7—C8—C3 −57.91 (15)

C10—C1—C2—C3 −60.21 (14) C10—C7—C8—C3 60.90 (15)

O2—C2—C3—C8 −176.45 (11) O1—C1—C9—C5 −178.82 (11)

C1—C2—C3—C8 60.90 (14) C2—C1—C9—C5 −59.32 (14)

O2—C2—C3—C4 63.46 (14) C10—C1—C9—C5 59.47 (14)

C1—C2—C3—C4 −59.19 (14) C6—C5—C9—C1 −60.02 (14)

C8—C3—C4—C5 −58.53 (15) C4—C5—C9—C1 59.79 (15)

C2—C3—C4—C5 60.44 (15) O1—C1—C10—C7 −179.64 (10)

C3—C4—C5—C6 58.54 (16) C9—C1—C10—C7 −59.76 (14)

C3—C4—C5—C9 −60.85 (15) C2—C1—C10—C7 60.24 (14)

C4—C5—C6—C7 −58.44 (16) C6—C7—C10—C1 59.48 (14)

C9—C5—C6—C7 60.76 (15) C8—C7—C10—C1 −60.59 (14)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A

O2—H2A···O1 0.84 2.45 2.8688 (15) 112

O1—H1A···O2i 0.84 2.02 2.8625 (15) 176

O2—H2A···O1ii 0.84 2.10 2.8633 (14) 152

Figure

Figure 1The molecular structure of (I), with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the50% probability level and H atoms shown as spheres of arbitrary radii.
Figure 2

References

Related documents

My method has been to select certain of the more important figures which appear regularly in the Abstract, particularly to illustrate the principles and scope of the volume,

Thetrunkhasbeenshowntoworkasanactivesegmentratherthanapassengerunitduringgaitand itisfeltthattrunkkinematicsshouldbegivenmoreconsiderationduringgaitassessment.While3

signaling was also reduced at the tissue level, as demonstrated by immunostaining of cells positive for pSmad2/3 in the fibrocar- tilage in Achilles tendon enthesis

An occlusal contact is defined as the touching o f opposing teeth and an occlusal interference (01) is any tooth contact that inhibits the rem aining occluding

In our case and corroborating the reports of other cases, af- ter visualization of the lesion by computed tomography and magnetic resonance, we demonstrated that the lesion

Evaluation of the changes in land use and land cover change (LULCC) in re- spect to oil exploration across the Albertine region in Uganda has been fo- cused around the exploration

However, when it comes to comparison tasks like stance classification in threaded discussions, each reply is made against a post or a response to a source post (see Fig. So, we ask,

– Word Unigram, Character 2-5 gram TF- IDF vectors, dialect probabilities for the tweets which contained arabic text.. – Word Unigram, Character 2-5 gram TF- IDF vectors for the