• No results found

Tier 2 Handbook [v2018-19].pdf

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Tier 2 Handbook [v2018-19].pdf"

Copied!
14
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

TIER 2

TIER 2

Processes & Products

HANDBOOK

(2)

Systems/Teams

Team Composition

(TFI 2.1, 2.2)

MEMBERSHIP DESCRIPTIONS

NAME

BACK UP

ROLE

Administrative authority:

Applied behavior expertise:

Knowledge of students:

Knowledge about operation of school

across grade levels & programs:

Additional members:

Roles:

Administrator= administrative voice (not facilitator)

Meeting Facilitator= sets and runs agenda for meeting

Data Analyst and/or Intervention Coordinators= brings data reports and leads data discussion

Minute Taker= keeps minutes of meetings and provides copies for members

Internal Coach= guides team on best practice by asking good questions

External Coach= guides team on best practice by asking good questions, an outside perspective

Team C

omposition

Team Operating Procedures

(TFI 2.2)

a) Annual Team Calendar, with meeting dates/locations

(attach building-specific form to the back of your Tier 2 Process and Products Handbook)

b) Meeting or agenda format:

(attach building-specific form to the back of your Tier 2 Process and Products Handbook)

c) Team Roles/backups:

(attach building-specific form to the back of your Tier 2 Process and Products Handbook)

Team

O

per

ating

Pr

oc

edur

es

Forms

(TFI 2.4) (attach building-specific form to the back of your Tier 2 Process and Products Handbook)

Request for Assistance form –

staff complete to notify Tier 2 Team

of students with academic or behavioral concerns

(3)

2) Decision Rule for Staying On

1. Define Responding

2. “Steps to Take When Not Responding”

INTERVENTION:

Check In/Check Out

Name of Intervention (if different):

Team

Team Composition

(TFI 2.1)

NAME

CICO Coordinator

Da

ta

Data for Decision-Making

(TFI 2.3, 2.7, 2.10 & 2.11)

Indicators 

Interventions

On Track

Check-in/Check-out

1) Decision Making Rule for Entrance In - Data Table

Team Operating Procedures

(TFI 2.2)

Current monthly action plan, based on progress monitoring data

(attach building-specific form to the back of your Tier 2 Process and Products Handbook)

Team

O

per

ating

Pr

oc

edur

es

3) Decision Rule for Exit Out - Fading Procedures

(4)

Facilitators: CICO

Facilita

tors

CICO FACILITATORS

NAME

(BACKUP OPT)

LOCATION

Facilitator

Facilitator

Facilitator

Facilitator

Facilitator

Facilitator

Facilitator

Facilitator

Facilitator

Facilitator

3) Data Process Flow Charts

CICO

INITIAL NOTIFICATION

ON-GOING UPDATES

Parents/Families/Caretakers

Who:

When:

Method

Who:

When:

Method

Teachers of student on CICO

Who:

When:

Method

Who:

When:

Method

Communication: CICO

Communica

(5)

Professional Development

(2.3, 2.9)

Pr

ofessional D

ev

elopmen

t

CICO

ORIENTATION

SCHEDULED

ANNUALLY (√)

Facilitators

TOPICS: (checklist)

 Procedures for daily check in

 Procedures for daily check out

 Data collection and progress monitoring

 Parent communication

Staff

TOPICS: (checklist)

 Decision-Making Rules (in/on/out)

 Intervention Procedures

(feedback, forms, process, data, etc.)

 Staff Expectations

 Links to Tier 1: Teaching, Reinforcement and Consequence Systems

Daily Cycle

Decision-rules used to identify students (IN ON OUT) Paperwork: Request for Assistance

CICO Daily Progress Report

How to properly give feedback on score of 0-1-2 (model or show video example) How to handle students who are upset with score/feedback

What to do when students forget/lose their DPR

Guest teachers/subs

 Daily Cycle

 CICO Daily Progress Report

How to properly give feedback on score of 0-1-2 (model or show video example) How to handle students who are upset with score/feedback

What to do when students forget/lose their DPR

Parents/Families/Caretakers

For ALL families, presented at beginning of year as one of many supports offered to students

 Inform during registration process

 Communicate via open house, conferences, newsletters, newspaper, webpage, PTA

For families of students nominated for CICO by decision rules:

 Process for explaining/obtaining consent

 Phone call is made directly to family; followed by letter

 Consent: check with your district's decision makers

Students

For ALL students, presented at beginning of year as one of many supports offered to students.

For students qualifying for intervention through decision-rules:

Teach who, what, when, where, how, & why for daily logistics

Teach what to do if their CICO facilitator is absent

Teach what to do when they disagree or are disappointed with a score

Teach what to do if they lose or throw away their card

Teach them what their data means

Staff Expectations:

• Provide feedback to students directly throughout the day.

• Record staff-managed & office-managed behaviors consistently – best indicator of student need for intervention.

• Refer students directly by completing Request for Assistance.

• Provide feedback to inform change in intervention by completing

• Reverse Request for Assistance provided by the team.

• Other:

Forms

(TFI 2.4) (attach building-specific form to the back of your Tier 2 Process and Products Handbook)

Daily Progress Report –

student progress report and feedback sheet (introduced in Module 2)

Parent Information Flyer/Letter/Video

Student Information Flyer/Video

(6)

INTERVENTION:

Check In/Check Out

with Modified Features (CICO WMF)

Team

Team Composition

(TFI 2.1)

NAME

CICO WMF Coordinator

Data for Decision-Making

(TFI 2.3, 2.7, 2.10 & 2.11)

Da

ta

1. Decision-Making rule for entrance into CICO WMF: Student has not met goal for CICO (DPR) and/or has not

made progress on other indicator(s) that were used to get IN to CICO.

2. Modified Features - menu of options:

Student selects adult to check in & out with

Additional check-in times with the facilitator can be added

Student selects the location to check in & out

3. Document modification with phase change.

Communication: CICO WMF

Communica

tion

CICO WMF Communication

INITIAL NOTIFICATION

ON-GOING UPDATES

Parents/Families/Caretakers

Who:

When:

Method

Who:

When:

Method

Teachers of student on CICO

Who:

When:

Method

Who:

When:

Method

Forms

(TFI 2.4) (attach building-specific form to the back of your Tier 2 Process and Products Handbook)

CICO WMF Daily Progress Report –

student progress report and feedback sheet

(7)

2) Decision Rule for Staying On

1. Define Responding

2. “Steps to Take When Not Responding”

INTERVENTION:

Social Academic Instructional Groups (SAIG)

Data for Decision-Making

(TFI 2.3, 2.7, 2.10 & 2.11)

Da

ta

Team

Team Composition

(TFI 2.1)

NAME

SAIG Coordinator

1) Decision Making Rule for Entrance In - Data Table

Indicators 

Interventions

ON TRACK

SAIG: Academic behavior skills

SAIG: Pro-social skills

SAIG: Problem solving skills

3) Decision Rule for Exit Out - Fading Procedures

Transition to CICO

(8)

Facilitators & Groups

Facilita

tors & G

roups

SOCIAL ACADEMIC

INSTRUCTIONAL GROUP

(SAIG) OPTIONS

GROUP

OFFERED

TIME/FREQUENCY

GRADE(S)

CURRICULUM

DPR MODIFIED FOR

SAIG

Pro-social skills:

replacement behaviors for

avoidance, withdrawal, etc.

Group Focus

:

Friendship Skills/Social

Awareness/Relationship

Building

Problem-solving skills:

replacement behaviors for

fighting, arguing, etc.

Group focus:

Conflict Resolution Skills/

Anger Management Skills/Self

Management

Academic Behavior skills:

includes organization

SAIG Facilitators

NAME

GROUP

Facilitator

Facilitator

Facilitator

4) Data Process Flow Chart

CICO Coordinator reviews data and asks teachers to complete the RFA or RRFA when student meets “IN” criteria

CICO Coordinator receives RFA or FFR; places student in SAIG w/in 3 days after providing

orientation to student/parents

Responded

Partially responded

Did not respond

Fade to Check in/ Check out (CICO)

Continue SAIG for another cycle

1, 2, & 4 weeks after placement, the SAIG Coordinator reviews

individual student DPR data (“ON” data) to check for initial systems issues to correct (like 0 points collected, missing

DPR or data points, etc.) Refer to Tier 3 Team

SAIG Coordinator send Reverse Request for Assistance (RRFA) to staff

who referred student

4-6 weeks after placement, the SAIG Coordinator reviews individual student data (“ON” data) to determine

student’s response to intervention

SAIG Coordinator reports on SAIG fidelity data 1x/monthly during

Tier 2 team meeting on Tier 2/ Tier3 Tracking Tool (T2T3TT)

TYING IT ALL TOGETHER

START

Add a layer of intervention

(9)

Professional Development

(2.3, 2.9)

Pr

ofessional D

ev

elopmen

t

Staff Expectations:

• Provide feedback to students directly throughout the day.

• Record staff-managed & office-managed behaviors consistently – best indicator of student need for intervention. • Refer students directly by completing Request for Assistance.

• Provide feedback to inform change in intervention by completing • Reverse Request for Assistance provided by the team.

• Other:

Forms

(TFI 2.4, 2.8) (attach building-specific form to the back of your Tier 2 Process and Products Handbook)

SAIG Daily Progress Report –

student progress report and feedback sheet

Forms

SAIG

INITIAL NOTIFICATION

ON-GOING UPDATES

Parents/Families/Caretakers

Who:When: Method

Who: When: Method

Teachers of student on CICO

Who:When:

Method Who: When: Method

Communication

Communica

tion

SAIG

ORIENTATION SCHEDULED ANNUALLY (√) Facilitators TOPICS: (checklist)

 Procedures for daily check in

 Procedures for daily check out

 Data collection and progress monitoring

 Parent communication

Staff

TOPICS: (checklist)

 Decision-Making Rules (in/on/out)

 Intervention Procedures

(feedback, forms, process, data, etc.)

 Staff Expectations

 Links to Tier 1: Teaching, Reinforcement and Consequence Systems

Daily Cycle

Decision-rules used to identify students (IN ON OUT) Paperwork: Request for Assistance

Group definitions and skill to be taught SAIG Daily Progress Report

How to properly give feedback on score of 0-1-2 (model or show video example How to handle students who are upset with score/feedback

What to do when students forget/lose their DPR

Guest teachers/subs

 Daily Cycle

 SAIG Daily Progress Report

How to properly give feedback on score of 0-1-2 (model or show video example) Practice giving feedback to students using skill language

How to handle students who are upset with score/feedback What to do when students forget/lose their DPR

Parents/Families/Caretakers

For ALL families, presented at beginning of year as one of many supports offered to students

 Inform during registration process

 Communicate via open house, conferences, newsletters, newspaper, webpage, PTA

For families of students nominated for SAIG by decision rules:

 Process for explaining/obtaining consent

 Phone call is made directly to family; followed by letter

 Consent: check with your district's decision makers

Students

For ALL students, presented at beginning of year as one of many supports offered to students.

For students qualifying for intervention through decision-rules:

Teach who, what, when, where, how, & why for daily logistics

Teach what to do if their SAIG facilitator is absent

Teach what to do when they disagree or are disappointed with a score

Teach what to do if they lose or throw away their card

(10)

EVALUATION

Student Performance Data

(TFI 2.10, 2.11 & 2.12)

Studen

t P

erf

ormanc

e D

ata

Periodic Assessment:

Team will review student data (# students/ # students responding) monthly on __________. (see T2/T3 Tracking Tool)

“A student is considered to be responding to the intervention if they have met the criteria the week prior to the team’s monthly review of data.”

Plan for sharing outcome data with stakeholders:

DATA

OUTCOME DATA

WHEN

METHOD OF

COMMUNICATION

WHO

Staff:

Tracking Tool:

District and Building

Leadership:

Tracking Tool:

Forms

(TFI 2.4, 2.8) (attach building-specific form to the back of your Tier 2 Process and Products Handbook)

Tier 2/Tier 3 Tracking Tool

Reverse Request for Assistance

Forms

Annual Fidelity Data

(2.13)

Annual E

valua

tion

Scheduled Annually:

After meeting 70% or better for a minimum of 1 time on the Tier 2 scale of the Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) on two

consecutive assessments, the team will conduct an annual evaluation (TFI) and record action steps on an action plan.

DATA

ANNUAL FIDELITY MEASURE

METHOD OF

COMMUNICATION

Staff:

TFI:

Board/Leadership

TFI:

(11)

Indicators 

Interventions

% of students that

fall within tiers

On Track

80-90%

Check-in/

Check-out

(CICO)

5-15% of students

Check-in Check out

with modified features

(CICOWMF)

Student has not met goal for CICO (DPR) and/or has not made progress on

other indicator(s) that were used to get IN to CICO

Social Academic

Intervention Groups

(SAIG)

Check and Connect

Tier 2 Data Table

D

ata f

or

D

ecision M

(12)
(13)

BUILDING-SPECIFIC

FORMS

PBIS Annual Team Calendar

Team Meeting Agenda

Request for Assistance

Reverse Request for Assistance

Daily Progress Report

Tier 2/Tier 3 Tracking Tool

CICO Parent Information/Flyer/Letter/Video

CICO Student Information/Flyer/Letter/Video

CICO WMF Daily Progress Report

SAIG Daily Progress Report

SAIG Parent Information/Flyer/Letter/Video

SAIG Student Information/Flyer/Letter/Video

Tier 2 Data Table

(14)

References

Related documents

H1: Number of days to contract expiry has a significant relationship with mispricing. H2: Price volatility of underlying stock has a significant relationship with mispricing. H3:

The result of above mentioned lack of formal policies endorsing independent living, the assumption in financial regulations that care facilities are to be shared through forced

Although total labor earnings increase with the unskilled unions’ bargaining power, we can say nothing when the increase in production is due to stronger skilled unions, since

BF Utilities Limited (BFUL), a part of the Kalyani Group, is engaged in the business of integrated infrastructure development in India.. BFUL is also engaged in

However, once the days and nights worked by each nurse are known there is no need to use a heuristic search to ®nd the best allocation of earlies and lates, as this problem can

Acronym Definition 4GLs Fourth Generation Programming Languages ACO Administrative Contracting Officer ADP Automatic Data Processing ADPE Automatic Data Processing Equipment

The idea behind this paper is to use max-min algorithm in cloudsim to show how to balance the load across the different storage nodes in the private cloud, which reduce the

Comments This can be a real eye-opener to learn what team members believe are requirements to succeed on your team. Teams often incorporate things into their “perfect team