• No results found

INDR 202 - Chapter 8

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "INDR 202 - Chapter 8"

Copied!
25
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

INDR  202

ENGINEERING  ECONOMICS

CHAPTER  8

BENEFIT-­COST  ANALYSIS

SPRING  2015

(2)

BENEFIT-­COST  ANALYSIS

Evaluation  of  Public  Projects

Benefit-­Cost  Ratio

Incremental  B/C  Analysis

Profitability  Index

(3)

EVALUATION  OF  PUBLIC  PROJECTS

Social  benefits  vs.  social  costs

Nonmonetary  benefits

(4)

EVALUATION  OF  PUBLIC  PROJECTS

TYPICAL  GOALS

Maximize benefits for given costs

(5)

BENEFITS  &  COSTS

USERS’  BENEFITS  &  DISBENEFITS

Primary (New  businesses)  &  Secondary (economic growth)

B  =  Benefits  -­ Disbenefits

SPONSOR’  S  COSTS

Expenditures  &  Savings

C  =  Capital  Costs  +  Annual  Operating  Costs  – Revenues  (toll)

SOCIAL  DISCOUNT  RATE

(analogue  of  MARR)

Ø Government  borrowing  rate  if  no  private  counterpart Ø Earning  rate  from  private  sector  if  there  are  private  

(6)

BENEFITS  &  COSTS

𝐵 = #

𝑏

%

1 + 𝑖

% )

%*+

𝐶 = #

𝑐

%

1 + 𝑖

% )

%*+

𝑏% benefits  at  the  end  of  period  𝑛 𝑐% expenses  at  the  end  of  period  𝑛

𝑁 project  life

(7)

BENEFITS  &  COSTS

𝐼 = #

𝑐

%

1 + 𝑖

% 1

%*+

𝐶

2

= #

𝑐

%

1 + 𝑖

% )

%*134

𝐶 = 𝐼 + 𝐶

2

Here,  we  assume  that  a  series  of  initial  investments  is  required  during  the  first  𝐾

(8)

BENEFIT-­COST  RATIO  (B/C)

𝐵𝐶 𝑖 =

𝐵

𝐶

=

𝐵

𝐼 + 𝐶

2

Well-­defined  if  𝐶 > 0

If 𝐵𝐶 𝑖 > 1,  then  𝑃𝑊 𝑖 > 0.

A  project  is  acceptable  if 𝐵𝐶 𝑖 > 1.

(9)

BENEFIT-­COST  ANALYSIS

9

STEP  1: All Users’  Benefits &  Disbenefits

Quantify all users’ benefits & disbenefits in same unit. Compute users’ net benefit.

STEP  2:  Sponsor’s Costs

Identify sponsor’s recurring & non-­recurring costs. Determine annual revenues, e.g., toll revenues. Compute sponsor’s net annual cost.

STEP  3:  Benefit-­Cost  Analysis Specify the interest rate.

Calculate users’ equivalent net benefit. Calculate sponsor’s equivalent net cost. Compute benefit-­cost ratio 𝐵𝐶 𝑖 .

(10)
(11)

EXAMPLE  1:  BENEFIT-­COST  ANALYSIS

𝑛 𝑏% 𝑐%

0 $10

1 $10

2 $20 $5

3 $30 $5

4 $30 $8

5 $20 $8

𝐵 = $71.98

𝐶 = $37.41

𝐵𝐶 10% = 1.92 > 1

Accept  the  project.

𝑖 = 10%

In  this  example,

(12)

INCREMENTAL  B/C  ANALYSIS

STEP 1. Eliminate alternatives with B/C < 1.

STEP 2. Rank remaining alternatives in increasing order of 𝐼 + 𝐶′.

STEP 3. Compute differences for 𝑗, 𝑘 with 𝐼J + 𝐶J2 > 𝐼K + 𝐶K2.

∆𝐵 = 𝐵J − 𝐵K, ∆𝐼 = 𝐼J − 𝐼K, ∆𝐶2 = 𝐶J2 − 𝐶K2

STEP 4. Compute B/C ratio for 𝑘 − 𝑗.

𝐵𝐶 𝑖 JMK = ∆𝐵 ∆𝐼 + ∆𝐶2

(13)

INCREMENTAL  B/C  ANALYSIS

𝐵𝐶 𝑖

JMK

=

∆𝐵

∆𝐼 + ∆𝐶

2

If ∆𝐼 + ∆𝐶2 = 0, select the alternative with largest 𝐵.

Calculate 𝑩 & 𝑪 on annual basis for repeatable

(14)

EXAMPLE  2:  INCREMENTAL  B/C  ANALYSIS

A1 A2 A3

𝐵 $12,000 $35,000 $21,000

𝐼 $5,000 $20,000 $14,000

𝐶′ $4,000 $8,000 $1,000

(15)

EXAMPLE  2:  INCREMENTAL  B/C  ANALYSIS

A1 A2 A3

𝑃𝑊 𝑖 $3,000 $7,000 $6,000

𝐵𝐶 𝑖 1.33 1.25 1.40

Independent projects: all acceptable

(16)

EXAMPLE  2:  INCREMENTAL  B/C  ANALYSIS

Ranking  

Base A1 A3 A2

𝐼 + 𝐶2 $9,000 $15,000 $28,000

A1  vs.  A3: Prefer  A3  over  A1 since

𝐵𝐶 10% PM4 = $21,000 − $12,000

$15,000 − $9,000 = 1.50 > 1.

A3  vs.  A2: Prefer  A2 over  A3  since

(17)
(18)
(19)

PROFITABILITY  INDEX  (PI)

𝑃𝐼 𝑖 =

𝐵 − 𝐶

2

𝐼

BC>(<)1  ↔ PI>(<)1

BC:  to see whether the benefits outweight the costs

PI:  to quantify the amount of  value created per unit of  investment

Well-­defined  if  𝐼 > 0

If 𝑃𝐼 𝑖 > 1,  then  𝑃𝑊 𝑖 > 0.

(20)

EXAMPLE  3:  PROFITABILITY  INDEX

𝑛 𝑏% 𝑐%

0 $10

1 $20

2 $35 $5

3 $30 $5

4 $20 $7

5 $10 $7

𝐵 − 𝐶2 = $58.66

𝐼 = $28.69

𝑃𝐼 7% = 2.04 > 1

Accept  the  project.

𝑖 = 7%

(21)

EXAMPLE  4:  INCREMENTAL  PI  ANALYSIS

A1 A2 A3

𝐵 $12,000 $35,000 $21,000

𝐼 $5,000 $20,000 $14,000

𝐶′ $4,000 $8,000 $1,000

𝑃𝐼 𝑖 1.60 1.35 1.43

(22)

EXAMPLE  2:  INCREMENTAL  B/C  ANALYSIS

A1 A2 A3

𝑃𝑊 𝑖 $3,000 $7,000 $6,000

𝑃𝐼 𝑖 1.60 1.35 1.43

Independent projects: all acceptable

(23)

EXAMPLE  2:  INCREMENTAL  PI  ANALYSIS

23

Ranking  

Base A1 A3 A2

𝐼 $5,000 $14,000 $20,000

A1  vs.  A3: Prefer  A3  over  A1 since

𝑃𝐼 10% PM4 = $20,000 − $8,000

$14,000 − $5,000 = 1.33 > 1.

A3  vs.  A2: Prefer  A2 over  A3  since

𝑃𝐼 10% RMP = $27,000 − $20,000

$20,000 − $14,000 = 1.17 > 1.

(24)

SUMMARY

Benefit-­cost analysis is typically used in evaluation of public projects.

Challenges in public-­project analysis include identifying all the users distinctly from the project sponsor, the benefits & disbenefits of all involved parties, quantifying nonmonetary benefits & disbenefits, choosing the appropriate interest rate.

Benefit-­cost ratio (B/C) of a project with 𝐼 + 𝐶2 > 0 is:

𝐵𝐶 𝑖 = 𝐵

𝐶 =

𝐵

(25)

SUMMARY

Profitability index (PI) is the analogue of B/C in private sector. It measures capital efficiency. For 𝐼 > 0:

𝑃𝐼 𝑖 = 𝐵 − 𝐶

2

𝐼 .

A project is acceptable if 𝑃𝐼 𝑖 > 1.

References

Related documents

– $ At the elevated load level ( pv = 2 MPa &#34; ms –1 ) in the pin-on-disc system, the following friction changes resulting from the effects of the defor- mation and

Ø RTGS tends to owned and operated by the central bank Ø DNS tends to be owned and operated by private banks Ø Most systems are centralized and apply full-cost pricing Ø Some

If these interventions do not work with the student and the student continues to display the same disciplinary action requiring sanction then the student is referred to the

LJMU is committed to providing research students with relevant and appropriate opportunities to develop both specialist and generic research skills in line with its Researcher

regulatory environment in telecommunications which have important implications for rural and remote Indigenous communities: price controls, access to essential infrastructure,

Private Room Limit of Semi-Private room rate Deductible then 90% of Semi-Private room rate Deductible then 70% of Semi-Private room rate Deductible then 90% of Semi-Private room

Objective: To test whether utilization of infant preventive care services has reduced utilization of inpatient care and to determine whether implementation of Taiwan’s National

Executive summary ... Terms of reference ... Report structure ... Notional gearing ... The real risk-free rate ... The debt premium ... Evidence on the total cost of debt ... Cost