Worker Productivity: Ways
Worker Productivity: Ways
to Measure It and
to Measure It and
Demonstrate Value
Demonstrate Value
Jodi M. Jacobson, PhD Jodi M. Jacobson, PhD University of Maryland University of Maryland David Sharar, PhD David Sharar, PhDChestnut Global Partners
Chestnut Global Partners
Presentation for the 23
Presentation for the 23rdrdEmployee Assistance Society of Employee Assistance Society of
North America Institute North America Institute April 28, 2011, Las Vegas, NV April 28, 2011, Las Vegas, NV
What is Productivity?
What is Productivity?
Productivity
Productivity –
–
amount of output per unit of
amount of output per unit of
input
input
How can we measure this?
How can we measure this?
# hours worked to produce a good
# hours worked to produce a good
Revenue generated by an employee or salary
Revenue generated by an employee or salary
Alternate Ways to Consider
Alternate Ways to Consider
Productivity
Productivity
Cannot remove the human aspect from
Cannot remove the human aspect from
work and productivity
work and productivity
Need a mix of quantitative and qualitative
Need a mix of quantitative and qualitative
measures to accurately measure
measures to accurately measure
Begin with what you have an add self
Begin with what you have an add self-
-report data to measure lost work time
report data to measure lost work time
Lost Work Time = Absenteeism + Presenteeism
Lost Work Time = Absenteeism + Presenteeism
Importance of Indirect Costs
Importance of Indirect Costs
“
“You cannot manage what you canYou cannot manage what you can’’t measuret measure””(Dr. Ron Goetzel)(Dr. Ron Goetzel) Mortality: employee replacement, effect on family &
Mortality: employee replacement, effect on family &
friends, value of lost future income
friends, value of lost future income
Morbidity: lost wages (paid sick
Morbidity: lost wages (paid sick--time, unpaid sicktime, unpaid sick--time, time, payroll & benefit costs for absent employee), loss of
payroll & benefit costs for absent employee), loss of
vacation & personal leave, lost leisure time, disability,
vacation & personal leave, lost leisure time, disability,
idle employer assets
idle employer assets
Reduced productivity: return
Reduced productivity: return--toto--work productivity, health work productivity, health capital investment, on
capital investment, on--thethe--job training, newjob training, new--hiring hiring administration & training, teamwork & communication,
administration & training, teamwork & communication,
institutional effect among coworkers, effect on family
institutional effect among coworkers, effect on family
members
0 4 8 12 2 3 4 5 or more # of chronic conditions A v e . lo s t d a y s /y e a r Absence Presenteeism Anxiety Dx Obesity Hypertension Arthritis High Cholesterol Sleeping Problems Other Chronic Pain Fatigue Depression Back/Neck Pain Medical Drug Absence Presenteeism
Source: Loeppke, et al.; JOEM. July 2007
Top 10 medical conditions by annual medical, drug, and productivity over cost per 1000 FTEs for all companies
Introduction to Health and
Introduction to Health and
Productivity Management (HPM)
Productivity Management (HPM)
Health of a workforce is linked to productivity & health of
Health of a workforce is linked to productivity & health of
the economy
the economy
Human capital should be invested, it is not a cost to be
Human capital should be invested, it is not a cost to be
managed
managed
Human capital is 80% of the entire world
Human capital is 80% of the entire world’’s capitals capital
“The integrated management of health & injury risks, chronic illness & disability to reduce employees total health-related costs including medical expenditures, unnecessary absence
from work & lost performance from work”
Desired Outcomes
Desired Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Reduce medical & Reduce medical &
pharmacy costs
pharmacy costs
Reduce healthReduce health--related related
lost productivity
lost productivity
Improve employee Improve employee
satisfaction
satisfaction
Reduce sick days and Reduce sick days and
disability absence
disability absence
Reduce presenteeismReduce presenteeism
Secondary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes
Reduce healthReduce health--related related
lost productivity
lost productivity
Improve employee Improve employee
satisfaction
satisfaction
Reduce medical or Reduce medical or
pharmacy costs
pharmacy costs
Reduce sick days or Reduce sick days or
disability absence
disability absence
Reduce presenteeismReduce presenteeism IBI Survey of 450 employers (2010)
Introduction to Standardized
Introduction to Standardized
Measures
Measures
Need to assess your program and match
Need to assess your program and match
outcomes with the needs of the employer
outcomes with the needs of the employer
One size does not fit all for EAPs and their
One size does not fit all for EAPs and their
customers
customers
“the voice of the purchaser is more
important than ever. It is essential that
purchasers, at the very minimum,
understand the root causes of problems
involving health and productivity”
Things to Consider Before Getting
Things to Consider Before Getting
Started
Started…
…
Training
Training
Need buyNeed buy--in from counselors and employerin from counselors and employer
Timing
Timing
Need a preNeed a pre--and postand post--test score to measure changetest score to measure change
Data needs to be collected consistently and Data needs to be collected consistently and
accurately
accurately
Procedures
Procedures
How will you embed the questions into the EAP How will you embed the questions into the EAP
intake, assessment, and/or follow
intake, assessment, and/or follow--up?up?
Possible Measures
Possible Measures
(not an exhaustive list)
(not an exhaustive list)
Blueprint for Health
Blueprint for Health
Endicott Work and Productivity Scale
Endicott Work and Productivity Scale
Gallop Employee Engagement
Gallop Employee Engagement
Health and Labour Questionnaire
Health and Labour Questionnaire
Health and Productivity Questionnaire
Health and Productivity Questionnaire
Stanford Presenteeism Scale
Stanford Presenteeism Scale
Work Impairment Scale
Work Impairment Scale
Work Limitations Scale
Work Limitations Scale
Workplace Outcomes Suite
Workplace Outcomes Suite
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire
Worker Productivity Index
Worker Productivity Index
Work Productivity Short Index
Application to EAPs
Application to EAPs
Rationale for EAPs to Be Involved
Rationale for EAPs to Be Involved
1.
1.
Effectiveness in EAP should be defined as
Effectiveness in EAP should be defined as
improving health and productivity
improving health and productivity
2.
2.
Provide documentation regarding productivity
Provide documentation regarding productivity
payback
payback
specific to your program
specific to your program
3.
3.
Use empirical data to
Use empirical data to
differentiate your program
differentiate your program
4.
4.
The value proposition is moving away from just
The value proposition is moving away from just
counting utilization to
counting utilization to
measuring results
measuring results
5.
5.
Support for
Support for
‘
‘
generic
generic
’
’
EAP is at risk:
EAP is at risk:
purchasers
purchasers
prefer value to be quantified and data to be
prefer value to be quantified and data to be
credible
credible
6.
6.
We are not paid in proportion to our effectiveness
We are not paid in proportion to our effectiveness
and this won
and this won
’
’
t change without
t change without
embracing
embracing
outcomes.
What Questions Can Be
What Questions Can Be
Answered?
Answered?
What is the relationship between your EAP
What is the relationship between your EAP
intervention and work effectiveness?
intervention and work effectiveness?
How strong is the association between
How strong is the association between
your EAP and reduced absenteeism /
your EAP and reduced absenteeism /
presenteeism?
presenteeism?
How can you reliably monetize
How can you reliably monetize
absenteeism to produce a cost benefit?
absenteeism to produce a cost benefit?
How can your EAP provide your customer
How can your EAP provide your customer
with a credible and quantifiable report?
with a credible and quantifiable report?
Practical Barriers to
Practical Barriers to
Implementation
Implementation
Uncertainty about a valid, short, affordable
Uncertainty about a valid, short, affordable
measure
measure
Limited staff resources or data collection
Limited staff resources or data collection
capacity
capacity
…
…
costs are not ZERO
costs are not ZERO
Follow
Follow
-
-
up (post
up (post
-
-
tests) are DIFFICULT to obtain
tests) are DIFFICULT to obtain
Staff resistance to implementation (actively or
Staff resistance to implementation (actively or
passively)
passively)
Access to scientific data analysis expertise
Access to scientific data analysis expertise
Not sure we want to know the results
Not sure we want to know the results
Not sure how to produce meaningful reports
Two Key Methodological Barriers
Two Key Methodological Barriers
Sample size is too SMALL to detect
Sample size is too SMALL to detect
change with statistical significance
change with statistical significance
Response rate is too LOW to generalize
Response rate is too LOW to generalize
findings to larger population of EAP users
findings to larger population of EAP users
or the workplace
or the workplace
Overcoming Barriers
Overcoming Barriers
Decide if your measure should be administered
Decide if your measure should be administered
with all clients or a representative sample
with all clients or a representative sample
Staff who collect data need to be invested and
Staff who collect data need to be invested and
understand the value of outcomes
understand the value of outcomes
Make data collection a part of your normal
Make data collection a part of your normal
operational flow
operational flow
–
–
use technology when feasible
use technology when feasible
SELL the post
SELL the post
-
-
test during the pre
test during the pre
-
-
test to get
test to get
good locator data
good locator data
In needed, get help with follow
In needed, get help with follow
-
-
up, data analysis
up, data analysis
and report writing
Health and Productivity
Health and Productivity
Questionnaire
Questionnaire
Introduction to the Health and
Introduction to the Health and
Productivity Questionnaire
Productivity Questionnaire
Developed by Dr. Ron Kessler at Harvard
Developed by Dr. Ron Kessler at Harvard
Medical School with the World Health
Medical School with the World Health
Organization
Organization
Validation studies in 1997
Validation studies in 1997
-
-
1998
1998
Implemented in 23 countries
Implemented in 23 countries
Over 500,000 completed worldwide
HPQ
HPQ
-
-
Select
Select
“
“Health status GPS for your company
Health status GPS for your company”
”
(Integrated Benefits Institute)
(Integrated Benefits Institute)
Validated self
Validated self-
-report tool for health and
report tool for health and
work
work
Focus: absence, presenteeism, and lost
Focus: absence, presenteeism, and lost
productivity from chronic health conditions
productivity from chronic health conditions
Currently administered by IBI
Currently administered by IBI
Shorter, online, improved analysis and
Shorter, online, improved analysis and
business
business-
-friendly
friendly
HPQ
HPQ-
-Select (continued)
Select (continued)
Full report includes
Full report includes
Prevalence, treatment status, lost time from
Prevalence, treatment status, lost time from
absence and presenteeism, and lost
absence and presenteeism, and lost
productivity due to chronic conditions
productivity due to chronic conditions
Report prevalence for acute conditions
Report prevalence for acute conditions
Provides data for the business case for
Provides data for the business case for
investing in employee health
investing in employee health
Provides a baseline to measure changes over
Provides a baseline to measure changes over
time
Absenteeism and Presenteeism
Absenteeism and Presenteeism
Questions
Questions
Scoring Absenteeism
Scoring Absenteeism
2 ways to measure and score absenteeism
2 ways to measure and score absenteeism
1.
1. Respondent estimates how many hours worked Respondent estimates how many hours worked
over 4
over 4--week periodweek period
Absolute absenteeism = 4xB4 Absolute absenteeism = 4xB4 ––B6B6 Relative absenteeism = (4xB4
Relative absenteeism = (4xB4 ––B6) / (4B4)B6) / (4B4) Relative hours of work = B6/(4xB4)
Relative hours of work = B6/(4xB4)
2.
2. Respondent estimates how many hours worked in Respondent estimates how many hours worked in
past 7 days
past 7 days
Absolute absenteeism = 4xB4 –Absolute absenteeism = 4xB4 –4xB34xB3
Relative absenteeism = (4xB4 –Relative absenteeism = (4xB4 –4xB3) / 4xB44xB3) / 4xB4
Relative hours of work = B3/B4Relative hours of work = B3/B4
Scoring Presenteeism
Scoring Presenteeism
Measure of actual performance in relation to
Measure of actual performance in relation to
possible performance. Higher scores equal
possible performance. Higher scores equal
lower lost performance.
lower lost performance.
Absolute presenteeism = 10xB11Absolute presenteeism = 10xB11
Relative presenteeism = B11/B9 (restricted to range Relative presenteeism = B11/B9 (restricted to range
of 0.25 to 2.0)
of 0.25 to 2.0)
Note: B10 is not used in calculations; it is used to help
Note: B10 is not used in calculations; it is used to help
respondent focus response to B11 on past 4 weeks
respondent focus response to B11 on past 4 weeks
by asking about earlier times (Bounded recall
by asking about earlier times (Bounded recall
question)
Scoring Presenteeism (continued)
Scoring Presenteeism (continued)
Combine RELATIVE absenteeism and
Combine RELATIVE absenteeism and
presenteeism into one score:
presenteeism into one score:
First, create measure of relative work hours = 1 minus First, create measure of relative work hours = 1 minus
relative absenteeism
relative absenteeism
Limitations of not using full HPQ measure
Limitations of not using full HPQ measure
Lose additional questions that allow for imputation Lose additional questions that allow for imputation
and consistency checks
and consistency checks
Lost memory priming question seriesLost memory priming question series
Cannot add or compare data to larger master datasetCannot add or compare data to larger master dataset
H&P Snapshot
H&P Snapshot
Estimation of typical prevalence, treatment, and
Estimation of typical prevalence, treatment, and
lost work time associated with chronic health
lost work time associated with chronic health
conditions for similar workplace
conditions for similar workplace
Predicts
Predicts
Health conditions (treated and untreated)Health conditions (treated and untreated)
Lost work time resulting from absence and Lost work time resulting from absence and
presenteeism
presenteeism
BottomBottom--line impact of lost productivity costs in line impact of lost productivity costs in
financial terms
financial terms
Requires basic workforce demographic and
Requires basic workforce demographic and
financial information
Workplace Outcome
Workplace Outcome
Suite
Suite
Introduction to the Workplace
Introduction to the Workplace
Outcome Suite
Outcome Suite
Workplace focused (not a clinical
Workplace focused (not a clinical
measure)
measure)
Based on a formative measurement model
Based on a formative measurement model
Validated with demonstrated
Validated with demonstrated
psychometrics
psychometrics
Short, but precise (sensitive to change)
Short, but precise (sensitive to change)
FREE with signed license agreement
FREE with signed license agreement
You may use one, some or all scales
You may use one, some or all scales
Workplace Outcome Suite Scales
Workplace Outcome Suite Scales
5 scales, 5 items per scale (new scales are being created) 5 scales, 5 items per scale (new scales are being created)
Absenteeism: # hours away from work in past 30 days
Absenteeism: # hours away from work in past 30 days……can also can also use this to monetize
use this to monetize
Presenteeism: proxy for productivity; extent to which problems Presenteeism: proxy for productivity; extent to which problems inhibit work
inhibit work
Engagement: measure of
Engagement: measure of ‘‘overover’’involvement with the jobinvolvement with the job
Life Satisfaction: gauges importance of job to Life Satisfaction: gauges importance of job to ‘‘lifelife’’
Workplace Distress: looks at distress at work across problems Workplace Distress: looks at distress at work across problems
Absenteeism
Absenteeism
Indicate past 30 days the total hours your personal
Indicate past 30 days the total hours your personal
problem(s):
problem(s):
Caused you to miss work altogether. Caused you to miss work altogether. Made you late for work.
Made you late for work. Caused you to take off early. Caused you to take off early.
Pulled you away from your normal work location
Pulled you away from your normal work locationwhile still at while still at work.
work.
Required you to be on the phone, e
Required you to be on the phone, e--mail, or internet while at mail, or internet while at work.
Presenteeism
Presenteeism
Indicate past 30 days the degree to which you agree with:
Indicate past 30 days the degree to which you agree with: I had a hard time doing my work because of my personal I had a hard time doing my work because of my personal problems.
problems.
My personal problems kept me from concentrating on my work. My personal problems kept me from concentrating on my work. Because of my personal problems I was not able to enjoy my Because of my personal problems I was not able to enjoy my work.
work.
My personal problems made me worry about completing my My personal problems made me worry about completing my tasks.
tasks.
I could not do my job well because of my personal problems. I could not do my job well because of my personal problems.
Data From Two Fortune 100
Data From Two Fortune 100
Companies
Companies
N = 197
N = 197
Mainly affiliate network model with <10%
Mainly affiliate network model with <10%
of onsite internal model
of onsite internal model
Statistically significant results
Statistically significant results
For Absenteeism, a nonparametric
For Absenteeism, a nonparametric
Wilcoxon signed rank test was used
Wilcoxon signed rank test was used
(p=.009)
(p=.009)
Presenteeism was also statistically
Presenteeism was also statistically
significant (p=.000)
Figure 1: Comparison of Pretest and Postest Means
H
o
u
rs
o
f
M
is
s
e
d
W
o
rk
P
re
s
e
n
te
e
is
m
s
c
o
re
Figure 1: Comparison of Pretest and Posttest
Figure 1: Comparison of Pretest and Posttest
means on the five scales of the WOS
Future of Health and Productivity
Future of Health and Productivity
Measurement for EAPs
Measurement for EAPs
What is the role, or potential of EAP?
What is the role, or potential of EAP?
Functioning independently or
Functioning independently or
Larger organizational initiative
Larger organizational initiative
HPM
HPM –
–
program or concept?
program or concept?
Linking measures to intervention
Linking measures to intervention
Who to focus on?
Who to focus on?
How to share data:
How to share data:
with the organization
with the organization
with the broader field
with the broader field
For More Information
For More Information…
….
.
Presenters
Presenters
Jodi Jacobson
Jodi Jacobson
[email protected]
[email protected]