R E S E A R C H
Open Access
Fixed point of set-valued graph contractive
mappings
Ismat Beg
1*and Asma Rashid Butt
2*Correspondence:
begismat@yahoo.com
1Centre for Mathematics and
Statistical Sciences, Lahore School of Economics, Lahore, Pakistan Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
Abstract
Let (X,d) be a metric space and letF,Hbe two set-valued mappings onX. We obtained sufficient conditions for the existence of a common fixed point of the mappingsF,Hin the metric spaceXendowed with a graphGsuch that the set of vertices ofG,V(G) =Xand the set of edges ofG,E(G)⊆X×X.
MSC: Primary 47H10; secondary 47H04; 47H07; 54C60; 54H25
Keywords: fixed point; directed graph; metric space; set-valued mapping
1 Introduction and preliminaries
Edelstein [] generalized classical Banach’s contraction mapping principle and Nadler [] proved Banach’s fixed point theorem for set-valued mappings. Recently several extensions of Nadler’s theorem in different directions were obtained; see [–]. Beg and Azam [] extended Edelstein’s theorem by considering a pair of set-valued mappings with a gen-eral contractive condition. The aim of this paper is to study the existence of common fixed points for set-valued graph contractive mappings in metric spaces endowed with a graphG. Our results improve/generalize [, , ] and several other known results in the literature.
Let (X,d) be a complete metric space and letCB(X) be a class of all nonempty closed and bounded subsets ofX. ForA,B∈CB(X), let
D(A,B) :=max
sup
b∈B
d(b,A),sup
a∈A
d(a,B)
,
where
d(a,B) :=inf
b∈Bd(a,b).
MappingDis said to be aHausdorff metricinduced byd.
Definition . LetF:X→Xbe a set-valued mapping,i.e.,Xx→Fxis a subset ofX. A pointx∈Xis said to be afixed pointof the set-valued mappingFifx∈Fx.
Definition . A metric space (X,d) is called aε-chainable metric space for someε> if givenx,y∈X, there isn∈Nand a sequence (xi)ni=such that
x=x, xn=y and d(xi–,xi) <ε fori= , . . . ,n.
LetFixF:={x∈X:x∈Fx}denote the set of fixed points of the mappingF.
Definition . Let (X,d) be a metric space,ε> , ≤κ< andx,y∈X. A mappingf :
X→Xis called (ε,κ) uniformly locally contractive if <d(x,y) <ε⇒d(fx,fy) <κd(x,y).
The following significant generalization of Banach’s contraction principle [, Theo-rem . ] was obtained by Edelstein [].
Theorem .[] Let(X,d)be aε-chainable complete metric space.If f :X→X is a(ε,κ)
uniformly locally contractive mapping,then f has a unique fixed point.
Afterwards, in , Nadler [] proved a set-valued extension of Banach’s theorem and obtained the following result.
Theorem .[] Let(X,d)be a complete metric space and F:X→CB(X).If there exists
κ∈(, )such that
D(Fx,Fy)≤κd(x,y) for all x,y∈X,
then F has a fixed point in X.
Nadler [] also extended Edelstein’s theorem for set-valued mappings.
Theorem .[] Let(X,d)be aε-chainable complete metric space for someε> and let F:X→C(X)be a set-valued mapping such that Fx is a nonempty compact subset of X.If F satisfies the following condition:
x,y∈X and <d(x,y) <ε ⇒ D(Fx,Fy) <κd(x,y),
then F has a fixed point.
Consider a directed graphGsuch that the set of its vertices coincides withX(i.e.,V(G) :=
X) and the set of its edgesE(G) :={(x,y) : (x,y)∈X×X,x=y}. We assume thatGhas no parallel edges and weighted graph by assigning to each edge the distance between the vertices; for details about definitions in graph theory, see [].
We can identifyGas (V(G),E(G)).G–denotes the conversion of a graphG, the graph
obtained fromGby reversing the direction of its edges.Gdenotes the undirected graph obtained fromGby ignoring the direction of edges ofG. We considerGas a directed graph for which the set if its edges is symmetric, thus we have
E(G) :=E(G)∪EG–.
Definition . Asubgraphof a graphGis a graphHsuch thatV(H)⊆V(G) andE(H)⊆
E(G) and for any edge (x,y)∈E(H),x,y∈V(H).
Definition . Letxandybe vertices in a graphG. ApathinGfromxtoyof lengthn
(n∈N∪ {}) is a sequence (xi)ni=ofn+ vertices such thatx=x,xn=yand (xi–,xi)∈
Definition . The number of edges inGconstituting the path is called thelength of the path.
Definition . A graphGisconnectedif there is a path between any two vertices ofG.
If a graphGis not connected, then it is calleddisconnected. Moreover,Gis weakly con-nected ifGis connected.
Assume thatGis such thatE(G) is symmetric, andxis a vertex inG, then the subgraph
Gxconsisting of all edges and vertices, which are contained in some path inGbeginning at
x, is called the component ofGcontainingx. In this case the equivalence class [x]Gdefined onV(G) by the ruleR(uRvif there is a path fromutov) is such thatV(Gx) = [x]G.
PropertyA: For any sequence (xn)n∈NinX, ifxn→xand (xn,xn+)∈E(G) forn∈N, then
(xn,x)∈E(G).
Definition . Let (X,d) be a metric space andF,H:X→CB(X). The mappingsF,H
are said to be graph contractive if there existsκ∈(, ) such that
(x=y), (x,y)∈E(G) ⇒ D(Fx,Hy) <κd(x,y),
and ifu∈Fxandv∈Hyare such that
d(u,v) <d(x,y),
then (u,v)∈E(G).
Definition . Apartial order is a binary relation over a setXwhich satisfies the following conditions:
. xx(reflexivity);
. ifxyandyx, thenx=y(antisymmetry); . ifxyandyz, thenxz(transitivity);
for allx,yandzinX.
A set with a partial orderis called apartially ordered set.
Let (X,) be a partially ordered set andx,y∈X. Elementsxandyare said to be compa-rable elementsofXif eitherxyoryx.
Letbe a partial order inX. Define the graphG:=Gby
E(G) :=(x,y)∈X×X:xy,x=y, andG:=Gby
E(G) :=(x,y)∈X×X:xy∨yx,x=y.
The class ofG-contractive mappings was considered in [] and that ofG-contractive
mappings in [].
The weak connectivity ofGorGmeans, givenx,y∈X, there is a sequence (xi)ni=such
We shall make use of the following lemmas due to Nadler [], Assad and Kirk [] in the proof of our results in next section.
Lemma . If A,B∈CB(X)with D(A,B) <,then for each a∈A there exists an element b∈B such that d(a,b) <.
Lemma . Let{An}be a sequence in CB(X)andlimn→∞D(An,A) = for A∈CB(X).If
xn∈Anandlimn→∞d(xn,x) = ,then x∈A.
2 Common fixed point
We begin with the following theorem that gives the existence of a common fixed point (not necessarily unique) in metric spaces endowed with a graph for the set-valued mappings. Further, we assume that (X,d) is a complete metric space andGis a directed graph such thatE(G) is symmetric.
Theorem . Let F,H:X→CB(X) be graph contractive mappings and let the triple
(X,d,G)have the propertyA.Set XF :={x∈X: (x,u)∈E(G)for some u∈Fx}.Then the
following statements hold.
. For anyx∈XF,F,H|[x]G have a common fixed point.
. IfXF=∅andGis weakly connected,thenF,Hhave a common fixed point inX.
. IfX:= {[x]G:x∈XF},thenF,H|X have a common fixed point.
. IfF⊆E(G),thenF,Hhave a common fixed point.
Proof . Letx∈XF, then there existsx∈Fxsuch that (x,x)∈E(G). SinceF,H are graph contractive mappings, we have
D(Fx,Hx) <κd(x,x).
Using Lemma ., we have the existence ofx∈Hxsuch that
d(x,x) <κd(x,x). ()
Again, becauseF,Hare graph contractive (x,x)∈E(G), also (x,x)∈E(G), sinceE(G) is symmetric, we have
D(Fx,Hx) <κd(x,x) <κd(x,x),
and Lemma . gives the existence ofx∈Fxsuch that
d(x,x) <κd(x,x). ()
Continuing in this way, we havexn+ ∈Fxn andxn+ ∈Hxn+, n= , , , . . . . Also,
(xn,xn+)∈E(G) such that
Next we show that (xn) is a Cauchy sequence inX. Letm>n. Then
d(xn,xm)≤d(xn,xn+) +d(xn+,xn+) +d(xn+,xn+) +· · ·+d(xm–,xm)
<κn+κn++κn++· · ·+κm–d(x,x) =κn +κ+κ+· · ·+κm–n–d(x,x)
=κn
–κm–n –κ
d(x,x)
becauseκ∈(, ), –κm–n< .
Therefored(xn,xm)→ asn→ ∞implies that (xn) is a Cauchy sequence and hence converges to some point (say)xin the complete metric spaceX.
Now we have to show thatx∈Fx∩Hx.
For n even: By property A, we have (xn,x)∈E(G). Therefore, by using graph contractivity, we have
D(Fxn,Hx) <κd(xn,x).
Sincexn+∈Fxnandxn→x, therefore by Lemma .,x∈Hx.
For n odd: As (x,xn)∈E(G),
D(Fx,Hxn) <κd(x,xn).
Now, by following the same arguments as above,x∈Fx.
Next as (xn,xn+)∈E(G), also (xn,x)∈E(G) forn∈N. We infer that (x,x, . . . ,xn,x) is a path inGand sox∈[x]G.
. Since XF =∅, so there exists x∈XF, and sinceGis weakly connected, therefore [x]G=X, and by , mappingsFandHhave a common fixed point inX.
. It follows easily from and .
.F⊆E(G) implies that allx∈Xare such that there exists someu∈Fxwith (x,u)∈E(G)
soXF=Xand by and .F,Hhave a fixed point.
Remark . ReplaceXFbyXH:={x∈X: (x,u)∈E(G) for someu∈Hx}in conditions - of Theorem ., then the conclusion remains true. That is, ifXF∪XH=∅, then we have
FixF∩FixH=∅, which follows easily from -. Similarly, in condition , we can replace
F⊆E(G) byH⊆E(G).
Corollary . is a direct consequence of Theorem .().
Corollary . Let(X,d)be a complete metric space and let the triple(X,d,G)have the
property A.If G is weakly connected,then graph contractive mappings F,H:X→CB(X)
such that(x,x)∈E(G)for some x∈Fxhave a common fixed point.
Corollary . Let(X,d)be aε-chainable complete metric space for someε> .Let F,H:
X→CB(X)be such that there existsκ∈(, )with
<d(x,y) <ε ⇒ D(Fx,Hx) <κd(x,y).
Proof Consider the graphGasV(G) :=Xand
E(G) :=(x,y)∈X×X: <d(x,y) <ε. ()
Theε-chainability of (X,d) meansGis connected. If (x,y)∈E(G), then
D(Fx,Hy) <κd(x,y) <κε<ε
and by using Lemma ., for each u∈Fx, we have the existence of v∈Hy such that
d(u,v) <ε, which implies (u,v)∈E(G). HenceFandHare graph contractive mappings. Also, (X,d,G) has property A. Indeed, if xn→x and d(xn,xn+) <ε for n∈N, then d(xn,x) <εfor sufficiently large n, therefore (xn,x)∈E(G). So, by Theorem .(),Fand
Hhave a common fixed point.
Theorem . Let F :X→ CB(X) be a graph contractive mapping and let the triple
(X,d,G)have the propertyA.Set XF :={x∈X: (x,u)∈E(G)for some u∈Fx}.Then the
following statements hold.
. For anyx∈XF,F|[x]Ghas a fixed point.
. IfXF=∅andGis weakly connected,thenFhas a fixed point inX.
. IfX:= {[x]G:x∈XF},thenF|X has a fixed point.
. IfF⊆E(G),thenFhas a fixed point. . IfXF=∅,thenFixF=∅.
Proof Statements - can be proved by takingF=Hin Theorem . and obtained from Remark ..
Note that the assumption thatE(G) is symmetric is not needed in our Theorem ..
Remark .
. If we assumeGis such thatE(G) :=X×X, then clearlyGis connected and our Theorem .() improves Nadler’s theorem, and further ifFis single-valued, then we improve the Banach contraction theorem.
. IfFis a single-valued mapping, then Theorem .(, ) with the graphGimproves [, Theorem .].
. IfFis a single-valued mapping, then Theorem .(, ) with the graphGimproves [, Theorem .].
. IfF=His a single-valued mapping, then Theorem . and Theorem . partially generalize [, Theorem .].
. If we takeF=Has single-valued mappings in Corollary ., then we have [, Theorem .].
. If we takeF=H, then Corollary . becomes Theorem . due to [].
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
Author details
1Centre for Mathematics and Statistical Sciences, Lahore School of Economics, Lahore, Pakistan.2Department of
Mathematics, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.
Received: 26 November 2012 Accepted: 30 April 2013 Published: 17 May 2013 References
1. Edelstein, M: An extension of Banach’s contraction principle. Proc. Am. Math. Soc.12, 07-10 (1961) 2. Nadler, SB: Multivalued contraction mappings. Pac. J. Math.30, 475-488 (1969)
3. Azam, A, Arshad, M: Fixed points of a sequence of locally contractive multivalued maps. Comput. Math. Appl.57, 96-100 (2009)
4. Azam, A, Beg, I: Common fixed points of fuzzy maps. Math. Comput. Model.49, 1331-1336 (2009)
5. Beg, I, Azam, A: Fixed points of multivalued locally contractive mappings. Boll. Unione Mat. Ital., A (7)4, 227-233 (1990)
6. Beg, I, Butt, AR: Fixed point for set valued mappings satisfying an implicit relation in partially ordered metric spaces. Nonlinear Anal.71, 3699-3704 (2009)
7. Beg, I, Butt, AR: Fixed points for weakly compatible mappings satisfying an implicit relation in partially ordered metric spaces. Carpath. J. Math.25(1), 01-12 (2009)
8. Beg, I, Butt, AR: Common fixed point for generalized set valued contractions satisfying an implicit relation in partially ordered metric spaces. Math. Commun.15(1), 65-76 (2010)
9. Beg, I, Nashine, HK: End-point results for multivalued mappings in partially ordered metric spaces. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci.2012, Article ID 580250 (2012)
10. Daffer, PZ: Fixed points of generalized contractive multivalued mappings. J. Math. Anal. Appl.192, 655-666 (1995) 11. Daffer, PZ, Kaneko, H, Li, W: On a conjecture of S. Reich. Proc. Am. Math. Soc.124, 3159-3162 (1996)
12. Feng, Y, Liu, S: Fixed point theorems for multivalued contractive mappings and multivaled Caristi type mappings. J. Math. Anal. Appl.317, 103-112 (2006)
13. Klim, D, Wardowski, D: Fixed point theorems for set-valued contractions in complete metric spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl.334, 132-139 (2007)
14. Reich, S: Fixed points of contractive functions. Boll. Unione Mat. Ital.5(4), 26-42 (1972) 15. Qing, CY: On a fixed point problem of Reich. Proc. Am. Math. Soc.124, 3085-3088 (1996)
16. Beg, I, Butt, AR, Radojevic, S: Contraction principle for set valued mappings on a metric space with a graph. Comput. Math. Appl.60, 1214-1219 (2010)
17. Kirk, WA, Goebel, K: Topics in Metric Fixed Point Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990) 18. Johnsonbaugh, R: Discrete Mathematics. Prentice Hall, New York (1997)
19. Nieto, JJ, Rodríguez-López, R: Contractive mapping theorems in partially ordered sets and applications to ordinary differential equations. Order22, 223-239 (2005)
20. Ran, ACM, Reurings, MCB: A fixed point theorem in partially ordered sets and some applications to matrix equations. Proc. Am. Math. Soc.132, 1435-1443 (2004)
21. Assad, NA, Kirk, WA: Fixed point theorems for setvalued mappings of contractive type. Pac. J. Math.43, 533-562 (1972) 22. Jachymski, J: The contraction principle for mappings on a metric space with a graph. Proc. Am. Math. Soc.1(136),
1359-1373 (2008)
doi:10.1186/1029-242X-2013-252