• No results found

Some results on the generalized Mittag Leffler function operator

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Some results on the generalized Mittag Leffler function operator"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

R E S E A R C H

Open Access

Some results on the generalized

Mittag-Leffler function operator

JC Prajapati

1

, RK Jana

2

, RK Saxena

3

and AK Shukla

2*

*Correspondence:

ajayshukla2@rediffmail.com

2Department of Mathematics, S. V.

National Institute of Technology, Surat, India

Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

Abstract

This paper is devoted to the study of a generalized Mittag-Leffler function operator introduced by Shukla and Prajapati (J. Math. Anal. Appl. 336:797-811, 2007). Laplace and Mellin transforms of this operator are investigated in this paper. Some special cases of the established results are also deduced as corollaries. The results obtained are useful where the Mittag-Leffler function occurs naturally.

MSC: 33E12; 26A33; 44A45

Keywords: generalized Mittag-Leffler function; Laplace transform; Mellin transform; H-function; generalized Wright function

1 Introduction

In , the Swedish mathematician Mittag-Leffler [, ] introduced the function

(z) =

n= zn

(αn+ )

α∈C;Re(α) > . (.)

A generalization of (.) was given by Wiman [] in  in the form

,β(z) =

n= zn

(αn+β)

α,β∈C;Re(α) > ,Re(β) > . (.)

In , in connection with the solution of certain singular integral equations, a further interesting and useful generalization of (.) was introduced by Prabhakar [] in the form

α,β(z) = ∞

n=

(γ)nzn

(αn+β)n! (.)

α,β,γ ∈C;Re(α) > ,Re(β) > ,Re(γ) > ,

where (γ)nis the Pochhammer symbol defined by

(γ)= ; (γ)n=γ(γ + )· · ·(γ+n– ) =

+n)

) ; γ= . (.)

(2)

A generalization of (.) is given by Shukla and Prajapati [] in the following form:

Eγα,,βq(z) =

n=

(γ)qnzn

(αn+β)n!, (.)

where (α,β,γ ∈C;Re(α) > ,Re(β) > ,Re(γ) > ,q∈(, )∪N).

The above generalization studied by Shukla and Prajapati is shown in a series of papers [–]. A generalization of Mittag-Leffler functions defined by (.) and (.) is introduced and studied by Srivastava and Tomovski [] in the form

Eγα,,βκ(z) =

n=

(γ)nκzn

(αn+β)n!, (.)

where α,β,γ,κ ∈C; Re(α) = Re(κ) –  > , Re(β) > , Re(γ) > , Re(κ) >  and the Pochhammer symbol forλ,μ∈Cis defined by

(λ)μ=

+μ)

(λ) =

⎧ ⎨ ⎩

 (μ= ,λ∈C\{});

λ(λ+ )· · ·(λ+n– ), μ=n∈N;λ∈C. (.)

The object of this paper is to derive the Laplace and Mellin transforms of the follow-ing integral operator associated with the generalized Mittag-Leffler function, defined by Shukla and Prajapati [] as well as Srivastava and Tomovski [], in the next sections:

α,,βq,ω;+f(x) =

x

(xt)β–Eγ,q

α,β w(xt)

αf(t)dt, (.)

whereα,β,γ ∈C;Re(α) > ,Re(β) > ,Re(γ) > ;q∈(, )∪N.

Shukla and Prajapati [] have shown that the Mellin-Barnes integral for the function defined by (.) is given by

α,,βq(z) =  πi(γ)

i

i

(–ξ)(γ +)

(αξ+β) (–z)

ξdξ. (.)

Asγ –→, then by virtue of the limit formula,

lim γ–→E

γ α,β(z) =

(β) (.)

reduces to the familiar Reimann-Liouville fractional integral

+f

(x) =  (α)

x

(xt)α–f(t)dt αC,Re(α) > . (.)

In the following, we will use the representation of a high transcendental function in terms of the so-called H-function defined as []

Hpm,q,n

z (a,A), . . . , (ap,Ap)

(b,B), . . . , (bq,Bq)

= 

πi

L

(3)

where

θ(ξ) = [

m

j=(bj+Bjξ)][nj=( –ajAjξ)]

[qj=m+( –bjBjξ)][

p

j=n+(aj+Ajξ)]

, (.)

and an empty product is always interpreted as unity;m,n,p,q∈Nwith ≤np, ≤ mq,Ai,BjR+,ai,bj∈RorC(i= , . . . ,p;j= , . . . ,q) such that

Ai(bj+k)=Bj(ail– ) (k,lN;i= , . . . ,n;j= , . . . ,m). (.)

The contourLis the path of integration in the complexξ-plane running fromγi∞to γ +i∞for some real numberγ.

2 Mellin transform of the operator (1.8)

Theorem . It is shown here that

MEαγ,,βq,ω;+f(x);s=  )( –s)

·H,,

wtα ( –γ,q)

(, ), ( –sβ,α)

Mtβf(t);s, (.)

where(Re(α) > ,Re(β) > ,Re(γ) > );q∈(, )∪N,Re( –sβ) > and H,,(·)is the H-function defined by(.).

Proof Mellin transform is defined as

Mf(x);s=

xs–f(x)dx.

Therefore, we have

MEαγ,,βq,ω;+f

(x);s=

xs–

x

(xt)β–Eαγ,,βq ω(xt) α

f(t)dt dx.

Interchanging the order of integration, which is permissible under the conditions given in Theorem ., we find that

MEαγ,,βq,ω;+f

(x);s

=

f(t)dt

t

xs–(xt)β–α,,βq ω(xt)αdx. (.)

If we considerx=t+uin the r.h.s. of (.), we get

MEαγ,,βq,ω;+f

(x);s=

f(t)dt

t

(t+u)s––Eγα,,βq ωu α

du. (.)

(4)

trans-forms into the form

MEαγ,,βq,ω;+f

(x);s=

f(t)dt

πi(γ)

i

i

(–ξ)(γ+)

(αξ+β) (–ω)

ξ

·

(t+u)s–+αξ–du dξ. (.)

If theu-integral is evaluated with the help of the formula

–(x+a)–ρdx=(ν)(ρν)

(ρ) ; Re(ρ) >Re(ν) > , (.)

then after some simplification, it is seen that the right-hand side of above equation (.) simplifies to

 πi(γ)( –s)

i∞ –i

(–ξ)(γ +)( –sβαξ)–ωtαξdξ ·

+s–f(t)dt (.)

which, on being interpreted by the definition of H-function (.), yields the desired

re-sult.

Forq= , Theorem . reduces to the following corollary.

Corollary . The following result holds:

MEαγ,β,ω;+f(x);s=  )( –s)

·H,,

wtα ( –γ, )

(, ), ( –sβ,α)

Mtβf(t);s, (.)

where(Re(α) > ,Re(β) > ,Re(γ) > );Re( –sβ) > and H,,(·)is the H-function defined by(.).

Theorem . It is shown here that

MEαγ,,βκ,ω;+f(x);s=  )( –s)

·H,,

wtα ( –γ,κ)

(, ), ( –sβ,α)

Mtβf(t);s, (.)

whereRe(α) =Re(κ) –  > ,Re(β) > ,Re(γ) > ,Re(κ) > ,Re( –sβ) > and H,,(·) is the H-function defined by(.).

3 Laplace transform of the operator (1.8)

Theorem . The following result holds:

LEγα,,βq,ω;+f

(x);p=  )p

βψ

(γ,q); ω/pα

–;

(5)

where(Re(α),Re(β),Re(γ) > );Re(p) >|ω|/Re(α)and F(p)is the Laplace transform of f(t) defined by

Lf(t);p=F(p) =

eptf(t)dt, (.)

whereRe(p) > and the integral is convergent.

Proof By virtue of the definitions (.) and (.), it follows that

LEγα,,βq,ω;+f

(x);p=

epx

x

(xt)β–Eαγ,,βq ω(xt) α

f(t)dt dx.

Interchanging the order of integration, which is permissible under the conditions given in Theorem ., we find that

LEγα,,βq,ω;+f(x);p=

f(t)dt

t

epx(xt)β–Eγ,q

α,β ω(xt) αdx.

If we considerx=t+u, we obtain

LEγα,,βq,ω;+f(x);p=

eptf(t)dt

epuuβ–α,,βq ωuαdu.

On making use of the series definition (.), the above expression becomes

LEγα,,βq,ω;+f

(x);p

= ∞

r=

(γ)qrωr

(αr+β)(r!)

eptf(t)dt

epuuβ+αr–du

= ∞

r=

(γ)qrωr +αr(r!)

eptf(t)dt

= 

)p

βψ

(γ,q); ω/pα

–;

F(p),

andF(p) is the Laplace transform off(t).

Forq= , Theorem . reduces to the following corollary.

Corollary . The following result holds:

ŁEαγ,β,ω;+f

(x);p=pβ –apαγF(p), (.)

where(Re(α) > ,Re(β) > ,Re(γ) > );Re(p) > and the integral operator is the one discussed by Prabhakar[]defined by(.).

Theorem . The following result holds:

LEγα,,βκ,ω;+f

(x);p=  )p

βψ

(γ,κ); ω/pα

–;

(6)

whereRe(α) =Re(κ) –  > ,Re(β) > ,Re(γ) > ,Re(κ) > ;Re(p) >|ω|/Re(α)and F(p)is the Laplace transform of f(t)defined by(.).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

The authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this article. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author details

1Department of Mathematical Sciences, Charotar University of Science and Technology, Anand, Changa, India. 2Department of Mathematics, S. V. National Institute of Technology, Surat, India.3Department of Mathematics and

Statistics, J. N. V. University, Jodhpur, India.

Received: 25 October 2012 Accepted: 13 January 2013 Published: 29 January 2013 References

1. Mittag-Leffler, GM: Sur la nouvelle function. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris137, 554-558 (1903)

2. Mittag-Leffler, GM: Sur la representation analytique d’une function monogene (cinquieme note). Acta Math.29, 101-181 (1905)

3. Wiman, A: Uber den Fundamental Salz in der Theorie der Funktionen. Acta Math.29, 191-201 (1905)

4. Prabhakar, TR: A singular integral equation with a generalized Mittag-Leffler function in the kernel. Yokohama Math. J. 19, 7-15 (1971)

5. Shukla, AK, Prajapati, JC: On a generalization of Mittag-Leffler function and its properties. J. Math. Anal. Appl.336, 797-811 (2007)

6. Shukla, AK, Prajapati, JC: On a generalization of Mittag-Leffler type function and generalized integral operator. Math. Sci. Res. J.12(12), 283-290 (2008)

7. Shukla, AK, Prajapati, JC: On a recurrence relation of generalized Mittag-Leffler function. Surv. Appl. Math.4, 133-138 (2009)

8. Shukla, AK, Prajapati, JC: Some remarks on generalized Mittag-Leffler function. Proyecciones28(1), 27-34 (2009) 9. Srivastava, HM, Tomovski, Z: Fractional calculus with an integral operator containing a generalized Mittag-Leffler

function in the kernel. Appl. Math. Comput.211, 198-210 (2009)

10. Mathai, AM, Saxena, RK, Haubold, HJ: The H-Function: Theory and Applications. Springer, New York (2010)

doi:10.1186/1029-242X-2013-33

References

Related documents

In this paper, the daily data of air tempera- ture, atmospheric precipitation for the Białystok climate station located within the Narew river and hydrological data such as flows

Өндөр уулын бэлчээр ургамлын зүйлийн тоо, бүрхэцээр бусад бүсээс давуутай, харин ургацын хуримтлал нь ойт хээрийн бүсэд илүү байна.. Уур амьсгалын өөрчлөлтийн нөлөө

4.1 Density: Density of the fluid plays a great role in functioning of the fluid coupling. The power transmission from impellor to rotor transmits through oil’s kinetic energy.

Jordan Arnold: Early Introduction of Computer Science Education in Minority

A stages of growth model is proposed to understand the stage at which at law firm is found concerning applications of information technology in knowledge management. Four stages

Patil Amol, PG Student, Department of Quality Assurance, Gangamai College of Pharmacy, North Maharashtra University, Jalgaon (M.S.) India. Warude Kapil:

T ABLE 3: C OMPARISON BETWEEN DFIRE, RW PLUS , D DFIRE, DFIRE2.0 AND OUR ENERGY FUNCTION (3DIGARS) ON 11 DECOY SETS BASED ON CORRECT SELECTION OF NATIVE FROM THEIR DECOY SET

When bitter orange oil compared with olive oil that is important nutritional and medicinal oil in terms of fat’s index values, we couldn’t reach the result of using bitter