• No results found

NDT Procedure Reshadat Project Complete Rev1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "NDT Procedure Reshadat Project Complete Rev1"

Copied!
165
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

NDT INSPECTION

PROCEDURE

Document No:

Rev. No.: 1 Class: 2 RSH-C3P-00-PL-PR-2811

NDT INSPECTION PROCEDURE

CONTRACT NO. : TSD 90 RSHP 716

PROJECT : SUBMARINE PIPELINES FOR RESHADAT,

ILAM-SALMAN AND ABOOZAR-NOWROOZ

COMPANY : IOOC

SITE : PERSIAN GULF, IRAN

Issued for Approval R. Kelders E.Hajimirzaei 1 14/09/2011 Issued for Approval R. Kelders E.Hajimirzaei 0 07/07/2011 DESCRIPTION PRPD CHKD APPD REV DATE (This document is the sole property of N.I.O.C; all information contained herein may neither be reproduced, used, transmitted nor in any way made public without permission of the owner)

(2)

NDT INSPECTION

PROCEDURE

Document No:

Rev. No.: 1 Class: 2 RSH-C3P-00-PL-PR-2811

List of NDT procedures on Reshadat Project

AUT 21130

-

General AUT Procedure

AUT Specific 11-406

-

Specific AUT Procedure 8inch

AUT Specific 11-407

-

Specific AUT Procedure 10inch

AUT Specific 11-408

-

Specific AUT Procedure 14inch

AUT Specific 11-409

-

Specific AUT Procedure 16inch

MT 11-410

-

MPI procedure

MUT Lam check 11-411

-

MUT lamination check procedure

(3)
(4)

Doc Ref : AUT 21130 Revision : 4

Date : 05-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : General Procedure

Page 2 of 16

Contents

1  Purpose 3  2  Scope 3  3  References 3  3.1  Inhouse documents 3  3.2  Abbreviations 4  3.3  Definitions 4  4  Personnel Qualifications 5  4.1  Rotoscan Operator 5  4.2  Manipulator Operator 5 

5  Rotoscan Equipment Description 5 

5.1  Multi-Channel Ultrasonic Equipment 5 

5.2  Recording 6 

5.3  Scanner and Umbilical 6 

5.4  Calibration Set-up 6 

6  Rotoscan Set-Up Configuration 7 

6.1  Inspection Set-up Configuration 7 

6.2  Probes Used for Inspection 7 

6.3  Probe Frame Layout 7 

6.4  Parameters of Rotoscan Inspection Program 7 

6.5  Calibration Block 7 

7  Calibration 8 

7.1  General 8 

7.2  Setting of Inspection Gates 8 

7.3  Sensitivity Settings 9 

7.4  Scanning Preparation & Surface Condition 9 

8  Acoustic Coupling Fluid 10 

9  Examination 10 

9.1  Calibration check 10 

9.2  Step by Step Description of a Rotoscan Examination 11 

9.3  Operational checks 11  10  Interpretation of results 12  10.1  General 12  10.2  Inspection result 12  11  Acceptance/Rejection criteria 13  12  Reporting 13  13  Examination of repairs 13  14  Storage of data 13 

Attachment 1 Rotoscan site report 14 

Attachment 2 Decision Flow Chart WMS 15 

(5)

Doc Ref : AUT 21130 Revision : 4

Date : 05-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : General Procedure

Page 3 of 16

1

Purpose

The purpose of this procedure is to detail the set-up and methodology of all Automated Ultrasonic Examination (AUT) to determine specific circumferential ‘Weld Integrity’, this is in accordance with and following the requirements of DNV-OS-F101: 2010

The job specific parameters will be documented in an adjacent specific procedure, describing at least the following items:

 Reference Specification  Detailed project scope

 Inspection set-up configuration  Transducer selection

 Probe frame layout

 Rotoscan parameter set-up

 Calibration manufacturing drawings  Acceptance criteria

2

Scope

This procedure details methods for all Automated Ultrasonic Weld Examination (via the APPLUS RTD Rotoscan System) of ferrous butt welds. The Rotoscan is an automated ultrasonic inspection system for pipeline girth welds, based upon the ‘Pulse Echo Method’, enhanced with mapping images and ‘Time of Flight Diffraction’.

The weld is divided into a number of depth zones, which are each inspected by one of an array of probes. The probes are arranged such that the entire weld is examined from both sides in a single circumferential scan. The ultrasonic information is transferred to a computer for data presentation and analysis.

3

References

3.1

documents

CP 31105 Verification procedure for ultrasonic multi-channel equipment CP 31108 Control Procedure of calibration blocks for Rotoscan system CP 31111 Verification procedure for Ultrasonic Phased Array Equipment NL IPS 10 Written Practice for the Training, Qualification, Certification and

Authorization of NDT Personnel.

EN 473 Non-Destructive-testing – Qualification and certification of NDT personnel – General Principles

SNT TC 1A Personnel Qualification and Certification in Non Destructive Testing For all other specification references see Specific procedure.

(6)

Doc Ref : AUT 21130 Revision : 4

Date : 05-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : General Procedure

Page 4 of 16

3.2

Abbreviations

 AUT Automatic Ultrasonic Examination.  CCW Counter Clockwise

 Conv Conventional  CW Clockwise  DS Downstream

 ECA Engineering Critical Assessment.  FBH Flat Bottom Hole.

 ID Internal Diameter  LOF Lack of Fusion

 LOP Lack of Penetration

 MUT Manual Ultrasonic Examination.  NDT Non destructive Testing

 OD Outside Diameter  PA Phased Array

 PE Pulse Echo

 ToFD Time of Flight Diffraction  US Upstream

 UT Ultrasonic Examination  WMS Workmanship

3.3

Definitions

 AUT Contractor ApplusRTD

 AUT Operator refers to the person responsible for all ultrasonic aspects of the inspection, recording and interpretation of results.

 Defect is an imperfection of sufficient magnitude to warrant rejection based on the criteria referenced by this procedure.

 Depth of the imperfection is the through-wall distance to the bottom of the imperfection as measured from the outside diameter of the pipe.

 Downstream the side of the girth weld nearest to the AUT scanner band.

 Go-NoGo level or Evaluation level is the level for pulse echo channels from which imperfections shall be evaluated and is used to determine imperfection length.

 Imperfection is a discontinuity or irregularity that is caused by the welding process and is not related to geometry indications.

 Indication is an ultrasonic response derived from either weld geometry or weld imperfection.

 Length of an imperfection will be defined if it has at least one amplitude value equal to or greater than the evaluation level.

 Procedure is a step-by-step description of the application of an NDT method.  Rotoscan Applus RTD trade name for our AUT System.

 Shall is a mandatory term.

 Should is a recommended practice or action.

 Threshold level is the level for pulse echo channels from which amplitude and transit distance are recorded by the system.

 Through Wall Height dimensions of the imperfection will be called the “Vertical Height” of the imperfection.

(7)

Doc Ref : AUT 21130 Revision : 4

Date : 05-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : General Procedure

Page 5 of 16

4

Personnel Qualifications

4.1

Rotoscan Operator

The ultrasonic lead operator performing the examination shall:

be qualified in accordance to the valid version of APPLUS RTD Written-Practice NL IPS 10 and in accordance with SNT TC 1A: 2006 and EN 473 (Level UT 2);

have experience with multi-channel UT equipment;

be trained and passed the Applus RTD in-house testing for Mechanised Ultrasonic Inspection course.

4.2

Manipulator Operator

The manipulator operator, handling the scanner mechanism shall be trained in using AUT-manipulators to the satisfaction of the Rotoscan operator.

5

Rotoscan Equipment Description

5.1

Multi-Channel Ultrasonic Equipment

A multi-channel ultrasonic flaw detector (type Rotoscan) shall be used, which provides an adequate number of inspection channels (referred to as sequences) to ensure a complete volumetric examination of the weld through thickness in one circumferential scan. Each inspection channel will provide a linear “A” scan presentation, which can be individually selected.

The system meets the following minimum requirements:

5.1.1

Global Parameters

Number of Sequences : Specific to weld design Main Gain : 0 – 40 dB

Digitizer Sampling Frequency : 50 MHz Overall System PRF : 4 kHz Scan resolution is not set higher than : 1 mm

5.1.2

Gate Parameters

In each sequence, the following parameters shall be selectable:  Transmitter and receiver channels numbers

 Programmable Gain (1 dB increments)  Gate start and length (min increment 0.1mm)  Delay (min increment 0.1mm)

 Threshold level 5% - 100% Full Screen Height (FSH) (1% increments)

 Recordable output selection between; Amplitude and/or Transit Distance, Mapping, ToFD and Coupling.

 Selection between First / Highest amplitude detection within the gated section.

5.1.3

General

 Electronic noise shall be lower than acoustical noise in all sequences, for the probes and sensitivities to be used during the inspection.

 The signal to noise ratio of each sequence during examination shall be  20 dB for shear-waves probes.

(8)

Doc Ref : AUT 21130 Revision : 4

Date : 05-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : General Procedure

Page 6 of 16

5.2

Recording

Inspection results are presented on-line on a colour monitor.

The screen layout and number of used sequences are configured to present the thickness of the weld to be examined.

Distance delays are applied to the output channels to compensate for variable transducer circumferential positions.

The presentation shows the following information;

 Amplitude and relevant transit distance (superimposed)  Mapping image sections

 Go – No-Go image section  Coupling check section  ToFD image section

 Circumferential position information

 Header section with possibility to present job specific information  Time and date of inspection

5.3

Scanner and Umbilical

The scanner to be used shall meet the following minimum requirements:  Mechanised operation during examination.

 Easy and quick mounting to the guide-band.

 Capable of taking up a minimum of 10 individually spring loaded ultrasonic probes, of which the distances to the weld centreline can be individually set.

 Coupling controllable per probe, or per set.  15 up/to 45metres of cable length.

 The scanner is equipped with an encoder for accurate measurement of the scanner position within the pipeline circumference.

 Scanner speed of 40 up to 80mm/sec

5.4

Calibration Set-up

The calibration set-up consists of a support, being a part of a thin wall dummy pipe of the same diameter as pipe under examination. On the support a guiding band is mounted at the same distance from the weld centreline as the guiding-band on the weld to be tested. In the support a cut-out area is present where a calibration block with the proper wall thickness is mounted which is used to monitor the ongoing system performance.

The calibration block(s) to be used shall be made from a piece of project pipe, without coating and no weld included.

(9)

Doc Ref : AUT 21130 Revision : 4

Date : 05-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : General Procedure

Page 7 of 16

6

Rotoscan Set-Up Configuration

6.1

Inspection Set-up Configuration

The inspection set-up is detailed in the specific procedure. It shows the selected probe angle(s) for the selected pulse echo, tandem and ToFD technique within the zones to be examined within the given weld bevel configuration.

6.2

Probes Used for Inspection

In the specific procedure the selected probes, with their parameters, which are used for the inspection are listed.

All probes have a unique number for QA/QC purpose relating to the manufacturing process and tests within the APPLUS RTD probe manufacturing department.

The numbers of probes used are part of the inspection parameter file within the Rotoscan inspection program.

6.3

Probe Frame Layout

The probes used for inspection are positioned within a probe frame.

The position of each probe in circumferential direction and its inspection function is detailed into the specific procedure.

6.4

Parameters of Rotoscan Inspection Program

The parameters will be taken from the job specific calibration block.

The Rotoscan operator may make adjustments to accommodate existing field conditions within the tolerances.

Note:

Any adjustments of parameters outside the specified tolerances shall be recorded.

6.5

Calibration Block

The calibration block shall be of matching wall thickness of the item under test and contain artificial defects to install the inspection sensitivity.

The block shall be designed with sufficient surface area to enable the transducer array to scan the target areas in one single pass.

Reflectors for the pulse echo technique shall be flat-bottom holes and notches, which are positioned at the weld bevel.

ToFD notches are used to identify the system capability to detect surface breaking indications. The calibration block shall be manufactured and tested according to Applus RTD verification procedure CP 31108.

A calibration certificate shall be issued.

The calibration block shall be identified with a hard stamped unique serial number. The specific procedure shows the calibration manufacturing drawings.

Notes:

Through-holes Ø 2mm or 5 x 1mm slots in both ends of calibration block at centre line. These reflectors are to locate weld centre position only.

(10)

Doc Ref : AUT 21130 Revision : 4

Date : 05-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : General Procedure

Page 8 of 16

7

Calibration

7.1

General

The ultrasonic equipment shall be electronically calibrated at least once per 12-month period (±1 week) in accordance with the valid version of Applus RTD procedure CP 31105 (Conv.) or CP 31111 (PA).

7.2

Setting of Inspection Gates

7.2.1

Pulse-Echo and Tandem channels

With each transducer positioned for the peak signal response from the calibration reflector, the detection gates are to be set.

The gate shall start at least 2mm, and up to 8mm (allowance for the width of heat affected zone) before the theoretical weld bevel preparation.

The gate ends shall be at least 1mm after the theoretical weld centreline.

All gates will be programmed to record amplitude and/or transit distance information. The gate length of the transit distance in the root channel will be extended to enable root penetration recognition.

7.2.2

Mapping Channels

The mapping gate shall start at least 2mm, and up to 8mm (allowance for width of heat affected zone) before the theoretical weld bevel preparation.

The gate length will be extended to enable cap reinforcement registration or to establish overtrace from adjacent mapping zones.

The mapping gates in the root will be set identical to the pulse echo transit distance channels to enable the recognition of the root penetration.

7.2.3

ToFD Channel

The ToFD gate should start at an appropriate distance before the arrival of the lateral wave (ca. 2mm) and should extend up to the back-wall echo and or mode converted, to achieve full cover of the wall thickness.

Note:

The gate settings may be altered if geometry indications dictate.

7.2.4

Coupling Channels

For Conventional Set up all PE probes, with exception of ToFD and Transverse probes, shall be used for transmission US/DS coupling control

For PA set up the number of coupling channels shall be seven (7) i.e. three (3) on each side for BWE and one (1) for transmission US/DS for coupling control

(11)

Doc Ref : AUT 21130 Revision : 4

Date : 05-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : General Procedure

Page 9 of 16

7.3

Sensitivity Settings

The equipment sensitivity (echo amplitude) for all inspection channels should be set at 80% Full Screen Height.

The calibration of the inner and outer surface breaking zones is from the relevant notch and all other zones from a FBH.

The sensitivity setting for mapping in the volume is on a 1.5mm FBH at 80% FSH + 14 dB but should not be so great as to cause interfering electrical or geometric noise that could be misinterpreted.

The sensitivity setting for mapping in the root, as a minimum, is equal to the related pulse echo channels, increased with additional 14 dB to ensure proper detection but should not be so great as to cause interfering electrical or geometric noise that could be misinterpreted. The lateral wave (RF signal) of the TOFD channel sensitivity is set between 40% and 80% FSH. The probe distance for TOFD should be calculated at 2/3 of the wall thickness (nominal beam angle) ± 10mm.

The sensitivity for the coupling channels is established by setting the amplitude of the signal from the transmitting probe to the receiving probe to 80%FSH added with a nominal 10 dB gain and 80% FSH added with a nominal 4dB for BWE.

7.4

Scanning Preparation & Surface Condition

Spiral welds or long seams have to be ground flush over the scanning area.

The scanning area shall be free of weld spatter and other irregularities, which may interfere with the inspection.

Adjacent to one weld side, prior to welding, over the complete circumference at a fixed distance from the nose of the weld preparation, a scribe line shall be available for the guide band position adjustment.

The client is responsible for applying the scribeline and the lead operator is responsible for the acceptance of the applied scribeline.

(12)

Doc Ref : AUT 21130 Revision : 4

Date : 05-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : General Procedure

Page 10 of 16

8

Acoustic Coupling Fluid

Water shall be used as acoustic coupling fluid, to be able to test welds in the range from 0°C to over lukewarm. If temperatures lower than 0°C are experienced coupling will be mixed with antifreeze and recycled.

The coupling is supplied between the probe contact surface and the pipe via supply channels incorporated in the probe housing.

To enable good acoustical contact between the ultrasonic probes and the pipe surface, conditions as mentioned in Section 7.4 apply.

9

Examination

9.1

Calibration check

During the first number of welds a calibration scan shall be made before and after inspection of each weld. If agreed with client, the frequency of verification scans may be reduced to a minimum of one scan for each number of welds. This will be detailed in the specific

procedure.

Re-calibration shall be carried out if any of the following exist:

 The calibration of an inspection function differs more than -2 or +2dB from the previous calibration;

 The gate settings need to be adjusted with more than +/- 1.0mm with the previous calibration;

 After a weld repair;

In case the calibration differs from the initial setting, outside the given tolerances, the applicable probe(s) and coupling shall be checked.

If the settings have to be changed to achieve a good calibration, the welds before this

calibration up to the previous calibration will be re-evaluated taking the differences in the gain and/or gate adjustment into account.

Re-scanning shall be carried out from last valid calibration:  After a equipment breakdown

 If hardware changes have to be made to scanner to achieve a valid calibration If above is applicable, the system shall not be used until 5 acceptable calibration have been performed to confirm acceptable stability.

The result of each calibration scan shall be printed or converted to pdf format and stored on hard disc.

(13)

Doc Ref : AUT 21130 Revision : 4

Date : 05-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : General Procedure

Page 11 of 16

9.2

Step by Step Description of a Rotoscan Examination

The UT-system is already calibrated and a calibration scan with a record has been made. a. Adjust guiding band on the pipe to a distance of 150mm from the marks (scribe-line,

which is 40mm from the weld centre-line) and parallel to the weld. The accuracy of the band setting should be ±1mm.

b. Mark a ‘0’ datum point on the top of the pipe at the 12 o’clock position.

c. Attach the scanner to the band. d. Switch on the water coupling supply.

e. Locate the scanner over the top of the pipe and make sure that all probes are past the zero point and are in proper contact with the pipe surface.

f. Switch on the system and automatically the weld will be scanned in a clockwise direction. g. Systems will switch off automatically after a full scan with an overlap minimum of 5cm. h. Coupling supply will be switched off as well. Check the encoder position of an indication

at the start of the scan and confirm the position of that same indication in the overlap, difference in position allowed is 10mm.

i. Check the inspection results on defect indications and proper coupling. Use the transit distance recording, mapping and images for validation of defect indications within the root area and proper alignment of the guiding band.

j. In case of lack of coupling a second scan will be necessary. Remove the scanner from the band and attach it to the calibration block.

9.3

Operational checks

Operational checks shall be performed according to the specific procedure. The execution of and the results of the operational checks shall be recorded in the system log book.

The following operational checks shall be performed for every weld inspected:

 Reference line shall be within required tolerance and clearly marked around the pipe circumference.

 The scanning surface shall be free of weld spatter and other irregularities that may interfere with the movement of transducers.

 Physical damage and loose connections in the band. Band position shall be within a tolerance of maximum ± 1.0mm.

 The pipe surface temperature shall be within the required tolerance specified in the Specific Procedure.

(14)

Doc Ref : AUT 21130 Revision : 4

Date : 05-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : General Procedure

Page 12 of 16

Once daily or at least once per shift, check:

 the scanner for damage and loose connections;  calibration block for damage and scanning tracks;

 The bevel prepared at the bevelling station shall be of the specific weld bevel geometry, dimensions and tolerances shown on the drawings of the calibration block in use.  Transducers shall not be rocking in the scanner and shall be in firm contact with the

scanning surface. The transducers shall be firmly screwed onto the wedges. The

transducer wear faces (wedges) shall be checked for scores which may cause local loss of contact.

 The transducer stand-off distance shall be as recorded in the set-up sheet within ± 0.5mm.

 The transducer case height and the difference between the protrusions of carbide tips shall be as recorded in the setup sheet within ± 0.2mm.

 The recording system shall clearly indicate the location of imperfections relative to the 12 o’clock position of the weld, with a ±1% accuracy or 10mm, whichever is greater.

10 Interpretation of results

10.1

General

With the transit distance measurements and with the information from the Mapping and ToFD channels, visible on the result presentation, indications shall be judged whether they are from the weld geometry or defects.

The coupling channels will be checked for coupling loss. Coupling loss will be registered when the through transmission signal drops below 10% FSH as long as this is above noise level. In case the coupling loss in one of the channels is longer than the shortest allowable defect length, a rescan shall be carried out.

In case the cause of the coupling loss is due to the surface condition (e.g. grinding) the surface condition shall be improved (e.g. smoothing) and the weld shall be re-scanned. If this condition appears again then the client shall be informed and another available and suitable certified method of inspection (e.g. Manual UT, Radiographic Examination) shall be used.

10.2

Inspection result

The inspection result should be evaluated and/or reported as follows;

 All indications in the pulse echo channels should be evaluated which exceed the threshold level mentioned in the acceptance criteria.

 Defect length in the pulse echo channels shall be measured at the Go – Nogo level as mentioned in the acceptance criteria.

 Linear elongated indications in the pulse echo channels with spacing less than the length of the smallest indication shall be evaluated as one continuous defect.

The interpretation sequence to be followed is visualized in Attachment 2 and 3 for the “Decision Flow Chart for WMS and ECA”.

(15)

Doc Ref : AUT 21130 Revision : 4

Date : 05-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : General Procedure

Page 13 of 16

11 Acceptance/Rejection criteria

For Acceptance/Rejection criteria see the project specific supplement

12 Reporting

The APPLUS RTD Rotoscan site report will be used for reporting of inspection results. The following information will be documented as minimum:

 Used procedure number;  Project name/number;  Weld No;

 Inspection date;  Diameter;  Wall thickness;

 Number of indications, location on circumference and location in depth;  Acceptable or rejectable.

For a sample of the Rotoscan site report, see attachment 2. An example of file naming, for Mainline Weld ML 1234

ML 1234 cal Calibration scan performed prior to mainline weld ML 1234 Scan of mainline weld

ML 1234 cal out Calibration scan performed at shift end.

13 Examination of repairs

Repaired areas shall be inspected with the Rotoscan system that originally detected the imperfection. This inspection will demonstrate that the original imperfection is removed and that no “new” imperfections are introduced to the weld.

The results from the ToFD inspection supplemented with the Mapping image will be used to interpret the repaired area.

Manual UT will be used in addition to the Rotoscan inspection in accordance with approved manual UT procedures.

If the repair requires a cut-out re-examination will be conducted using the Rotoscan equipment set-up for the bevel defined in the qualified project welding procedure.

14 Storage of data

The raw data of each inspected weld including the parameter settings will be stored on the main hard drive (C-Drive). In addition, a back-up will be made on a second hard drive (Removable D Drive)

The Date and Time function will be used to ensure that all welds scanned are accounted for. By selecting this function the date and time of each scan made becomes part of the file name, removing the chance of overwriting any file.

Welds will be stored in daily directories, which will be created at 24:00 hrs each day.

Operators are responsible for the daily directory on the main hard drive and shall ensure that all welds are present and readable. Each shift will store scans and calibrations in a windows folder of that date e.g. DD-MM-YYYY

All calibration and weld inspection results will be printed in a compressed black-white image of the entire weld circumference after acceptable scan is completed.

After completion of the pipeline project, all data (NDT, welds, repairs and calibrations) will be stored on a digital medium and presented.

The official record of inspection will be the Rotoscan Site Report and will bear the original signature of the AUT Rotoscan Operator.

(16)

Doc Ref : AUT 21130 Revision : 4

Date : 05-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : General Procedure

Page 14 of 16

(17)

Doc Ref : AUT 21130 Revision : 4

Date : 05-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : General Procedure

Page 15 of 16

(18)

Doc Ref : AUT 21130 Revision : 4

Date : 05-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : General Procedure

Page 16 of 16

(19)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

Applus RTD Benelux is the trading name of Röntgen Technische Dienst bv

If this is a copy, unless otherwise specified, it is uncontrolled. You must verify the revision before use.

Page 1 of 29

SPECIFIC PROCEDURE FOR

AUTOMATIC ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION

Project : Reshadat Project Client : KITO

Scope : Mechanized Ultrasonic Examination of girth welds Diameter : 8,625”

Wall thickness : 14,3mm Wall thickness : 15,9mm Wall thickness : 18,2mm Based on : DNV-OS-F 101-2010

Validity : This procedure is valid only for AUT-examination of girth welds up to 95°C

This procedure is valid in conjunction with the GENERAL procedure AUT 21130 latest revision

Development – Revisions

Revision No. Prepared By Date Approved By Date Amendment Details

1 T. Vreenegoor 14-09-2011 R. Kelders 14-09-2011 See revision record sheet, page 2 0 T. Vreenegoor 01-07-2011 R. Kelders 01-07-2011

Date 14-09-2011 Date 14-09-2011 Date Address

Delftweg 144, 3046 NC Rotterdam P.O. Box 10065, 3004 AB Rotterdam The Netherlands

www.ApplusRTD.com

This publication is the intellectual property of Applus RTD and may not be used in whole or in part for any purpose other than the business of Applus RTD and may not be used for the business of the recipient and may not be passed to any other person without the permission of Applus RTD.

(20)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

Page 2 of 29

Revision record sheet

Revision Issue date Section Description of update 1 14-09-2011 All Added company logo’s

General Changed reference DNV OS F101 2007 to 2010 D, E and F Updated cal block drawings, included full PIN number

(21)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : Client : Specific Procedure KITO Page 3 of 29

Contents

1 Purpose 4 2 Scope 4 3 Reference documents 4

4 Rotoscan Set-Up Configuration 4

4.1 Probe Frame Layout 4

4.2 Calibration Block 4

4.3 Gates 4

5 Acceptance/Rejection criteria 5

Attachment A: Inspection set-up configuration (will be finalised after setup) 6

8,625” x 14,3mm 6

8,625” x 15,9mm 6

8,625” x 18,2mm 6

Attachment B: Probe frame lay-out 7 Attachment C: Calibration block drawings 8,625” x 14,3mm 8 Attachment D: Calibration block drawings 8,625” x 15,9mm 15 Attachment E: Calibration block drawings 8,625” x 18,2mm 22

(22)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : Client : Specific Procedure KITO Page 4 of 29

1

Purpose

The purpose of this specific procedure is to detail the actual system configuration and set-up parameters including the reference blocks for Automated Ultrasonic Examination (AUT) to determine specific circumferential ‘Weld Integrity’, this is in accordance with the requirements of DNV-OS-F 101-2010 on the Reshadat project.

2

Scope

This procedure details methods for Automated Ultrasonic Weld Examination (via the APPLUS RTD Rotoscan System) of ferrous butt welds.

Diameter : 8,625” Wall thickness : 14,3mm : 15,9mm : 18,2mm

Weld Bevel : J-prep (Serimax)

3

Reference documents

• General AUT Procedure AUT 21130 Latest revision • DNV-OS-F 101-2010

• CP 31111 Latest revision

4

Rotoscan Set-Up Configuration

4.1

Probe Frame Layout

The probes used for inspection are positioned within a probe frame. The probe settings are visualised in Attachement A.

The position of each probe in circumferential direction and its inspection function is visualised in Attachment B.

4.2

Calibration Block

Detailed calibration block drawings and set ups are included in Attachment C, D and E. Production pipe will be used for Calibration Blocks.

4.3

Gates

All gate lengths and settings of Pulse Echo, Tandem , Mapping, ToFD and coupling channels are a part of the “rotoscan file” and these are saved with every weld scanned.

(23)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : Client : Specific Procedure KITO Page 5 of 29

5

Acceptance/Rejection criteria

The interpretation sequence to be followed is visualized in Attachment 3, the “Decision Flow Chart for ECA in the general procedure AUT 21130 latest revision.

(24)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

Page 6 of 29

Attachment A: Inspection set-up configuration

(will be finalised after setup)

8,625” x 14,3mm

Zone Name Reflector Cal. block

Frequency

Probe Angle Insp. Techn Ident. ToFD Upper/lower Notch ToFD 6 MHZ comp 65° ToFD H/I

1 cap Notch 1mm 4 MHZ shear 55° Pulse Echo A 2 Fill 2 Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 40°/48° Pulse Echo B 3 Fill 1 Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 40°/48° Pulse Echo C 4 Hot pass Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo D 5 Root Notch 1mm 4MHZ shear 65° Pulse Echo E Vol 1 Upper mapping Ø 1.5mm 4 MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo J Vol 2 Lower mapping Ø 1.5mm 4 MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo K

8,625” x 15,9mm

Zone Name Reflector Cal. block

Frequency

Probe Angle Insp. Techn Ident. ToFD Upper/lower Notch ToFD 6 MHZ comp 65° ToFD H/I

1 cap Notch 1mm 4 MHZ shear 55° Pulse Echo A 2 Fill 2 Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 40°/48° Pulse Echo B 3 Fill 1 Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 40°/48° Pulse Echo C 4 Hot pass Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo D 5 Root Notch 1mm 4MHZ shear 65° Pulse Echo E Vol 1 Upper mapping Ø 1.5mm 4 MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo J Vol 2 Lower mapping Ø 1.5mm 4 MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo K

8,625” x 18,2mm

Zone Name Reflector Cal. block

Frequency

Probe Angle Insp. Techn Ident. ToFD Upper/lower Notch ToFD 6 MHZ comp 65° ToFD I/J

1 cap Notch 1mm 4 MHZ shear 55° Pulse Echo A 2 Fill 3 Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 40°/48° Pulse Echo B 3 Fill 2 Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 40°/48° Pulse Echo C 4 Fill 1 Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 40°/48° Pulse Echo D 5 Hot pass Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo E 6 Root Notch 1mm 4MHZ shear 65° Pulse Echo F Vol 1 Upper mapping Ø 1.5mm 4 MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo K Vol 2 Lower mapping Ø 1.5mm 4 MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo L

(25)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

Page 7 of 29

Attachment B: Probe frame lay-out

Scan direction 8’625” x 14,3mm Cap DS Fill 2 DS TOFD DS Hot Pass DS Fill 1 DS Root DS Cap US Fill 2 US TOFD US Hot Pass US Fill 1 US Root US Scan direction 8’625” x 15,9mm Cap DS Fill 2 DS TOFD DS Hot Pass DS Fill 1 DS Root DS Cap US Fill 2 US TOFD US Hot Pass US Fill 1 US Root US Scan direction 8’625” x 18,2mm Cap DS Fill 3 DS TOFD DS Fill 1 DS Fill 2 DS Hot Pass DS Cap US Fill 3 US TOFD US Fill 1 US Fill 2 US Hot Pass US Root DS Root US

(26)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

Page 8 of 29

(27)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(28)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(29)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(30)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(31)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(32)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(33)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

Page 15 of 29

(34)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(35)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(36)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(37)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(38)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(39)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(40)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

Page 22 of 29

(41)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(42)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(43)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(44)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(45)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(46)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(47)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-406 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(48)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

Applus RTD Benelux is the trading name of Röntgen Technische Dienst bv

If this is a copy, unless otherwise specified, it is uncontrolled. You must verify the revision before use.

Page 1 of 38

SPECIFIC PROCEDURE FOR

AUTOMATIC ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION

Project : Reshadat Project Client : KITO

Scope : Mechanized Ultrasonic Examination of girth welds Diameter : 10,75” Wall thickness : 12,7mm Wall thickness : 14,3mm Wall thickness : 15,9mm Wall thickness : 18,2mm Based on : DNV-OS-F 101-2010

Validity : This procedure is valid only for AUT-examination of girth welds up to 95°C

This procedure is valid in conjunction with the GENERAL procedure AUT 21130 latest revision

Development – Revisions

Revision No. Prepared By Date Approved By Date Amendment Details

1 T. Vreenegoor 14-09-2011 R. Kelders 14-09-2011 See revision record sheet, page 2 0 T. Vreenegoor 01-07-2011 R. Kelders 01-07-2011

Date 14-09-2011 Date 14-09-2011 Date Address

Delftweg 144, 3046 NC Rotterdam P.O. Box 10065, 3004 AB Rotterdam The Netherlands

www.ApplusRTD.com

This publication is the intellectual property of Applus RTD and may not be used in whole or in part for any purpose other than the business of Applus RTD and may not be used for the business of the recipient and may not be passed to any other person without the permission of Applus RTD.

(49)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

Page 2 of 38

Revision record sheet

Revision Issue date Section Description of update 1 14-09-2011 All Added company logo’s

General Changed reference DNV OS F101 2007 to 2010 C, D, E and

F

(50)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : Client : Specific Procedure KITO Page 3 of 38

Contents

1 Purpose 4 2 Scope 4 3 Reference documents 4

4 Rotoscan Set-Up Configuration 4

4.1 Probe Frame Layout 4

4.2 Calibration Block 4

4.3 Gates 4

5 Acceptance/Rejection criteria 5

Attachment A: Inspection set-up configuration (will be finalised after setup) 6

10,75” x 12,7mm 6

10,75” x 14,3mm 6

10,75” x 15,9mm 7

10,75” x 18,2mm 7

Attachment B: Probe frame lay-out 8 Attachment C: Calibration block drawings 10,75” x 12,7mm 10 Attachment D: Calibration block drawings 10,75” x 14,3mm 17 Attachment E: Calibration block drawings 10,75” x 15,9mm 24 Attachment F: Calibration block drawings 10,75” x 18,2mm 31

(51)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : Client : Specific Procedure KITO Page 4 of 38

1

Purpose

The purpose of this specific procedure is to detail the actual system configuration and set-up parameters including the reference blocks for Automated Ultrasonic Examination (AUT) to determine specific circumferential ‘Weld Integrity’, this is in accordance with the requirements of DNV-OS-F 101-2010 on the Reshadat project.

2

Scope

This procedure details methods for Automated Ultrasonic Weld Examination (via the APPLUS RTD Rotoscan System) of ferrous butt welds.

Diameter : 10,75” Wall thickness : 12,7mm : 14,3mm : 15,9mm : 18,2mm

Weld Bevel : J-prep (Serimax)

3

Reference documents

• General AUT Procedure AUT 21130 Latest revision • DNV-OS-F 101-2010

• CP 31111 Latest revision

4

Rotoscan Set-Up Configuration

4.1

Probe Frame Layout

The probes used for inspection are positioned within a probe frame. The probe settings are visualised in Attachement A.

The position of each probe in circumferential direction and its inspection function is visualised in Attachment B.

4.2

Calibration Block

Detailed calibration block drawings and set ups are included in Attachment C, D, E and F. Production pipe will be used for Calibration Blocks.

4.3

Gates

All gate lengths and settings of Pulse Echo, Tandem, Mapping, ToFD and coupling channels are a part of the “rotoscan file” and these are saved with every weld scanned.

(52)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : Client : Specific Procedure KITO Page 5 of 38

5

Acceptance/Rejection criteria

The interpretation sequence to be followed is visualized in Attachment 3, the “Decision Flow Chart for ECA in the general procedure AUT 21130 latest revision.

(53)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

Page 6 of 38

Attachment A: Inspection set-up configuration

(will be finalised after setup)

10,75” x 12,7mm

Zone Name Reflector Cal. block

Frequency

Probe Angle Insp. Techn Ident. ToFD Upper/lower Notch ToFD 6MHZ comp 65° ToFD H/I

1 cap Notch 1mm 4 MHZ shear 55° Pulse Echo A 2 Fill 2 Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 40°/48° Pulse Echo B 3 Fill 1 Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 40°/48° Pulse Echo C 4 Hot pass Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo D 5 Root Notch 1mm 4MHZ shear 65° Pulse Echo E Vol 1 Upper mapping Ø 1.5mm 4 MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo J Vol 2 Lower mapping Ø 1.5mm 4 MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo K

10,75” x 14,3mm

Zone Name Reflector Cal. block

Frequency

Probe Angle Insp. Techn Ident. ToFD Upper/lower Notch ToFD 6 MHZ comp 65° ToFD H/I

1 cap Notch 1mm 4 MHZ shear 55° Pulse Echo A 2 Fill 2 Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 40°/48° Pulse Echo B 3 Fill 1 Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 40°/48° Pulse Echo C 4 Hot pass Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo D 5 Root Notch 1mm 4MHZ shear 65° Pulse Echo E Vol 1 Upper mapping Ø 1.5mm 4 MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo J Vol 2 Lower mapping Ø 1.5mm 4 MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo K

(54)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : Client : Specific Procedure KITO Page 7 of 38

10,75” x 15,9mm

Zone Name Reflector Cal. block

Frequency

Probe Angle Insp. Techn Ident. ToFD Upper/lower Notch ToFD 6 MHZ comp 65° ToFD H/I

1 cap Notch 1mm 4 MHZ shear 55° Pulse Echo A 2 Fill 2 Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 40°/48° Pulse Echo B 3 Fill 1 Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 40°/48° Pulse Echo C 4 Hot pass Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo D 5 Root Notch 1mm 4MHZ shear 65° Pulse Echo E Vol 1 Upper mapping Ø 1.5mm 4 MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo J Vol 2 Lower mapping Ø 1.5mm 4 MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo K

10,75” x 18,2mm

Zone Name Reflector Cal. block

Frequency

Probe Angle Insp. Techn Ident. ToFD Upper/lower Notch ToFD 6 MHZ comp 65° ToFD I/J

1 cap Notch 1mm 4 MHZ shear 55° Pulse Echo A 2 Fill 3 Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 40°/48° Pulse Echo B 3 Fill 2 Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 40°/48° Pulse Echo C 4 Fill 1 Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 40°/48° Pulse Echo D 5 Hot pass Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo E 6 Root Notch 1mm 4MHZ shear 65° Pulse Echo F Vol 1 Upper mapping Ø 1.5mm 4 MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo K Vol 2 Lower mapping Ø 1.5mm 4 MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo L

(55)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

Page 8 of 38

Attachment B: Probe frame lay-out

Scan direction 10’75” x 14,3mm Cap DS Fill 2 DS TOFD DS Hot Pass DS Fill 1 DS Root DS Cap US Fill 2 US TOFD US Hot Pass US Fill 1 US Root US Scan direction 10’75” x 12,7mm Cap DS Fill 2 DS TOFD DS Hot Pass DS Fill 1 DS Root DS Cap US Fill 2 US TOFD US Hot Pass US Fill 1 US Root US

(56)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : Client : Specific Procedure KITO Page 9 of 38 Scan direction 10’75” x 18,2mm Cap DS Fill 3 DS TOFD DS Fill 1 DS Fill 2 DS Hot Pass DS Cap US Fill 3 US TOFD US Fill 1 US Fill 2 US Hot Pass US Root DS Root US Scan direction 10’75” x 15,9mm Cap DS Fill 2 DS TOFD DS Hot Pass DS Fill 1 DS Root DS Cap US Fill 2 US TOFD US Hot Pass US Fill 1 US Root US

(57)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

Page 10 of 38

(58)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(59)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(60)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(61)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(62)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(63)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(64)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

Page 17 of 38

(65)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(66)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(67)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(68)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(69)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(70)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(71)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

Page 24 of 38

(72)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(73)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(74)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(75)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(76)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(77)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(78)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

Page 31 of 38

(79)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(80)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(81)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(82)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(83)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(84)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(85)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-407 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(86)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-408 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

Applus RTD Benelux is the trading name of Röntgen Technische Dienst bv

If this is a copy, unless otherwise specified, it is uncontrolled. You must verify the revision before use.

Page 1 of 14

SPECIFIC PROCEDURE FOR

AUTOMATIC ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION

Project : Reshadat Project Client : KITO

Scope : Mechanized Ultrasonic Examination of girth welds Diameter : 14”

Wall thickness : 15,9mm Based on : DNV-OS-F 101-2010

Validity : This procedure is valid only for AUT-examination of girth welds up to 95°C

This procedure is valid in conjunction with the GENERAL procedure AUT 21130 latest revision

Development – Revisions

Revision No. Prepared By Date Approved By Date Amendment Details

1 T. Vreenegoor 14-09-2011 R. Kelders 14-09-2011 See revision record sheet, page 2 0 T. Vreenegoor 01-07-2011 R. Kelders 01-07-2011

Date 14-09-2011 Date 14-09-2011 Date Address

Delftweg 144, 3046 NC Rotterdam P.O. Box 10065, 3004 AB Rotterdam The Netherlands

www.ApplusRTD.com

This publication is the intellectual property of Applus RTD and may not be used in whole or in part for any purpose other than the business of Applus RTD and may not be used for the business of the recipient and may not be passed to any other person without the permission of Applus RTD.

(87)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-408 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

Page 2 of 14

Revision record sheet

Revision Issue date Section Description of update 1 14-09-2011 All Added company logo’s

General Changed reference DNV OS F101 2007 to 2010 C Updated cal block drawings, included full PIN number

(88)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-408 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : Client : Specific Procedure KITO Page 3 of 14

Contents

1 Purpose 4 2 Scope 4 3 Reference documents 4

4 Rotoscan Set-Up Configuration 4

4.1 Probe Frame Layout 4

4.2 Calibration Block 4

4.3 Gates 4

5 Acceptance/Rejection criteria 5

Attachment A: Inspection set-up configuration (will be finalised after setup) 6

14” x 15,9mm 6

Attachment B: Probe frame lay-out 7 Attachment C: Calibration block drawings 14” x 15,9mm 8

(89)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-408 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : Client : Specific Procedure KITO Page 4 of 14

1

Purpose

The purpose of this specific procedure is to detail the actual system configuration and set-up parameters including the reference blocks for Automated Ultrasonic Examination (AUT) to determine specific circumferential ‘Weld Integrity’, this is in accordance with the requirements of DNV-OS-F 101-2010 on the Reshadat project.

2

Scope

This procedure details methods for Automated Ultrasonic Weld Examination (via the APPLUS RTD Rotoscan System) of ferrous butt welds.

Diameter : 14” Wall thickness : 15,9mm

Weld Bevel : J-prep (Serimax)

3

Reference documents

• General AUT Procedure AUT 21130 Latest revision • DNV-OS-F 101-2010

• CP 31111 Latest revision

4

Rotoscan Set-Up Configuration

4.1

Probe Frame Layout

The probes used for inspection are positioned within a probe frame. The probe settings are visualised in Attachement A.

The position of each probe in circumferential direction and its inspection function is visualised in Attachment B.

4.2

Calibration Block

Detailed calibration block drawings and set ups are included in Attachment C. Production pipe will be used for Calibration Blocks.

4.3

Gates

All gate lengths and settings of Pulse Echo, Tandem , Mapping, ToFD and coupling channels are a part of the “rotoscan file” and these are saved with every weld scanned.

(90)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-408 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type : Client : Specific Procedure KITO Page 5 of 14

5

Acceptance/Rejection criteria

The interpretation sequence to be followed is visualized in Attachment 3, the “Decision Flow Chart for ECA in the general procedure AUT 21130 latest revision.

(91)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-408 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

Page 6 of 14

Attachment A: Inspection set-up configuration

(will be finalised after setup)

14” x 15,9mm

Zone Name Reflector Cal. block

Frequency

Probe Angle Insp. Techn Ident. ToFD Upper/lower Notch ToFD 6 MHZ comp 65° ToFD H/I

1 cap Notch 1mm 4 MHZ shear 55° Pulse Echo A 2 Fill 2 Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 40°/48° Pulse Echo B 3 Fill 1 Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 40°/48° Pulse Echo C 4 Hot pass Ø 3mm 4MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo D 5 Root Notch 1mm 4MHZ shear 65° Pulse Echo E Vol 1 Upper mapping Ø 1.5mm 4 MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo J Vol 2 Lower mapping Ø 1.5mm 4 MHZ shear 50° Pulse Echo K

(92)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-408 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

Page 7 of 14

Attachment B: Probe frame lay-out

Scan direction 10’75” x 15,9mm Cap DS Fill 2 DS TOFD DS Hot Pass DS Fill 1 DS Root DS Cap US Fill 2 US TOFD US Hot Pass US Fill 1 US Root US

(93)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-408 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

Page 8 of 14

(94)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-408 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(95)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-408 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(96)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-408 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(97)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-408 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(98)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-408 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

(99)

Doc Ref : AUT specific 11-408 Revision : 1

Date : 14-09-2011

Title : Automatic Ultrasonic Examination Type :

Client :

Specific Procedure KITO

References

Related documents

We use data from the Survey of Insertion (Inquérito à Inserção), a survey carried out to evaluate the effects of vocational training programs on the transition to the labour

However, cells displaying low intracellular NAD levels retained the ability to secrete other proteins (such as the chemokine RANTES) in response to the same

* These storage times assume that safe food handling practices have been followed during all steps of food production and that food is stored properly in equipment that is

Every past tense sentence contains a form of the verb biti as verbal auxiliary, plus an L-participle.. To express in the past tense the idea that someone arrived,

Pro zprovoznění platformy BeagleBone Black je nutné provést několik důležitých úkonů, jako jsou zprovoznění komunikace mezi platformou a počítačem, nainstalování

fan pages on Facebook enriches the customers experience and positively affect relationships with customers, this result is consistent with( Benedikt, Werner,2012) who found

If the heater capacity is too big, the air in the sauna will heat very quickly, whereas the temperature of the rocks may remain insufficient; consequently, the water thrown on the

Compared to bilateral contracting between donors and implementers, donors that vertically integrate and do their own implementation offer the highest quality housing as rated