• No results found

Cloud Computing Performance Benchmarking Report. Comparing ProfitBricks and Amazon EC2 using standard open source tools UnixBench, DBENCH and Iperf

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Cloud Computing Performance Benchmarking Report. Comparing ProfitBricks and Amazon EC2 using standard open source tools UnixBench, DBENCH and Iperf"

Copied!
15
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Cloud Computing Performance

Benchmarking Report

Comparing ProfitBricks and Amazon EC2

using standard open source tools

UnixBench, DBENCH and Iperf

October 2014

(2)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Cloud Computing Performance Benchmark report is divided into several sections:

Introduction ... 3

Executive Summary ... 4

Benchmark Testing Methodology ... 4

UnixBench Results ... 6

DBench Results ... 9

Iperf Results ... 12

Next Steps ... 15

We invite you to contact one of our cloud service engineers by emailing

[email protected] or calling 866-852-5229. We offer a 14-day, no obligation trial that does

(3)

Introduction

At ProfitBricks, cloud computing performance is a primary focus for our teams of engineers. We take a comprehensive view on IaaS performance benchmarking. We contract with 3rd parties, explore, research and develop new testing methodologies in-house, and discover the bugs and limitations of traditional and new benchmarking tools. As a cloud computing service provider we realize that we are an edge case. Our responsibility for high performance extends from hardware and network architecture to the virtualization layer and the software we develop to manage the environment. Cloud computing’s multi-tenant architecture requires that we keep and maintain performance levels that exceed our customers’ expectations, and we strive to remain the highest performance cloud available in the market. To this end, the ProfitBricks performance engineering team continually tests the performance of other cloud platforms and services. Performance is our passion – and the team is dedicated to publishing accurate and repeatable results.

Benchmark testing dissimilar cloud computing environments requires a thorough understanding of the respective environments and the effects that each component may have on performance, It’s also essential that each benchmark test is run on top of a similar stack and software configuration. We recommend you to download our Workload-Specific Cloud Computing Performance Benchmarking Report in which we explore the performance of specific applications and databases like MySQL and Apache.

ProfitBricks strives to share our expertise with the community and to engage in an open dialogue about cloud performance. We welcome questions about our methodologies.

(4)

Executive Summary

In this report, the ProfitBricks performance engineering team presents our latest series of standardized benchmark testing results (UnixBench, DBENCH and Iperf), comparing ProfitBricks’ virtual data centers and instances with Amazon’s EC2 instances. We strive to create an apples to apples comparison of virtual servers/instances at both ProfitBricks and Amazon EC2, and have presented our methodologies with full transparency (see next section, Benchmark Testing Methodology). In January 2014 Amazon introduced a new line of instance sizes, based on new CPUs and new architecture. ProfitBricks engineers spent eight weeks configuring and testing these new EC2 “m3” instance types and compared them to similar ProfitBricks instances alongside Amazon’s legacy “m1” instances. The results show that ProfitBricks continues to be the performance leader in the cloud on all tested configurations, using all three standard benchmarks, showing results that are at least twice the performance of Amazon. In some cases the performance difference between ProfitBricks and Amazon EC2 is an astounding 17x (Iperf).

Benchmark Testing Methodology

All benchmarking tools were compiled on Ubuntu 12.04 (64-bit) servers running a 3.2.0.58 Linux kernel, and each test was performed three times on three separate days with the results averaged. By taking advantage of ProfitBricks’ granular scaling features, we were able to compare Amazon’s latest EC2 offerings to ProfitBricks servers with similar resource specifications. For example, we contrasted the performance of an EC2 m3.large with 2 vCPUs and 7.5GB of RAM with a ProfitBricks server containing 2 dedicated cores and 7.5GB of dedicated RAM (and equivalent InfiniBand-powered double redundant storage devices). In all cases, these are standard configurations at both ProfitBricks and Amazon. No special or optional services were added to the configurations. For each report, three test runs were completed on each instance for three days. Note: we continually see performance variations (sometimes large) on Amazon EC2 services that vary by instance size, by hour, and by data center. This is the main reason for multiple runs – we want to ensure that we’ve determined a representative composite result.

Server Configuration:

Amazon virtual instances are sold and packaged with a pre-packaged quantity of vCPUs, RAM and temporary storage.

ProfitBricks virtual instances are not pre-packaged, thus every instance can be uniquely configured. We’ve done our best to match equivalent ProfitBricks instances to Amazon instances on a hardware basis – not a cost basis.

(5)

OS Configuration:

Operating System: Ubuntu 12.04 (64-bit) with 3.2.0.58 Linux kernel

Each instance had the following packages installed if the provider did not include them with their images: make, GCC, automake, libpopt-dev, zlib1g-dev, g++. git

All benchmark software used in these tests is open source and we have provided the information you would need (including configuration details) to run these tests. You can download the tools from these URLs:

UnixBench: https://byte-unixbench.googlecode.com/files/UnixBench5.1.3.tgz

DBENCH: Use git to create a local branch of the official git repository and download the tree:

‘git clone git://git.samba.org/sahlberg/dbench.git dbench’

Iperf: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/iperf/iperf-2.0.5.tar.gz

For DBENCH and UnixBench, both of which test storage performance, a separate block device (EBS on EC2 vs. ProfitBricks block storage) was formatted with ext4 and mounted:

! mkfs.ext4+/dev/second_device+ ! mount+/dev/second_device+/bench+

(6)

UnixBench Results

UnixBench is one of the most popular open source benchmark performance testing tools which

combines multiple tests to assess various aspects of a system’s performance in a Unix-like system. ProfitBricks performance engineers run these tests multiple times over numerous days. The entire set of index values is then combined to calculate an overall performance index for the system.

In this UnixBench benchmark test, ProfitBricks exceeds the performance of Amazon’s new m3 instances by 2 to 4.4x, and Amazon’s m1 instances by 2.2 to 3.1x depending on the instance size. These tests were run over three separate days and the results and test configuration can be found in the UnixBench test results on the next two pages.

UnixBench test configuration:

Get HZ environment variable to what is configured as "CONFIG_HZ_?" in the kernel configuration: "grep 'CONFIG_HZ_' /boot/config-3.2.0-58-virtual"

• In case of Ubuntu 12.04 LTS: 250 HZ

Edit Makefile and change the following line:

! from "OPTON = -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -ffast-math -Wall"

! to "OPTON = -march=native -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -ffast-math -Wall"

Compile UnixBench:

! -HZ="250" make

Run UnixBench:

! HZ="250" ./Run -c NR_OF_CORES

(7)

UnixBench Results:

ProfitBricks Cloud Server Instances vs. Amazon AWS EC2 Instances – type m3

Instance Size ProfitBricks UnixBench score AWS EC2 UnixBench score ProfitBricks Performance Advantage EC2: m3.medium, ProfitBricks equivalent (1 CPU Core/3.75GB RAM) 1213.16 274.31 4.4x EC2: m3.large, ProfitBricks equivalent (2 CPU cores/7.5GB RAM) 1766.58 759.50 2.3x EC2: m3.xlarge, ProfitBricks equivalent (4 CPU cores/15GB 2475.73 1218.80 2.0x 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

m3.medium m3.large m3.xlarge

U n ixBe n ch sco re !

ProfitBricks UnixBench score! AWS EC2 UnixBench score!

(8)

UnixBench Results:

ProfitBricks Cloud Server Instances vs. Amazon AWS EC2 Instances – type m1

Instance Size ProfitBricks UnixBench score AWS EC2 UnixBench score ProfitBricks Performance Advantage EC2: m1.medium, ProfitBricks equivalent (1 CPU Core/3.75GB RAM) 1213.16 389.10 3.1x EC2: m1.large, ProfitBricks equivalent (2 CPU cores/7.5GB RAM) 1766.58 762.82 2.3x EC2: m1.xlarge, ProfitBricks equivalent (4 CPU cores/15GB RAM) 2475.73 1103.38 2.2x 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

m1.medium m1.large m1.xlarge

U n ixBe n ch sco re !

ProfitBricks UnixBench score! AWS EC2 UnixBench score!

(9)

DBench Results

DBENCH is a popular open source performance testing tool that generates I/O workloads for

a file system or networked CIFS of NFS server. It is used to stress a file system to see which workload becomes saturated.

In this DBENCH benchmark test, ProfitBricks exceeds the performance of standard EBS volumes on Amazon’s new m3 instances by 10.5 to 16x and Amazon’s m1 instances by 9.5 to 12.7x depending on instance size. These tests were run over three separate days and the results and test configuration can be found on the DBENCH test results on the next two pages.

DBENCH test configuration:

Compile(DBENCH:+ ! CFLAGS=”!march=native”+./autogen.sh+ ! CFLAGS=”!march=native”+./configure+ ! make+ Run(DBENCH:( ! ./dbench+–backend=fileio+–t+60+–D+/benchmark/bench+–loadfile=loadfiles/client.txt+48+

(10)

DBENCH Results:

ProfitBricks Cloud Server Instances vs. Amazon AWS EC2 Instances – type m3

Instance Size ProfitBricks DBENCH (MB/s) AWS EC2 DBENCH (MB/s) ProfitBricks Performance Advantage EC2: m3.medium, ProfitBricks equivalent (1 CPU Core/3.75GB RAM) 344.85 32.87 10.5x EC2: m3.large, ProfitBricks equivalent (2 CPU cores/7.5GB RAM) 505.05 31.13 16.2x EC2: m3.xlarge, ProfitBricks equivalent (4 CPU cores/15GB RAM) 641.31 48.63 13.2x 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

m3.medium m3.large m3.xlarge

D BEN C H (MB/ s) ! ProfitBricks DBECNH (MB/s)! AWS EC2 DBECNH (MB/s)!

(11)

DBENCH Results:

ProfitBricks Cloud Server Instances vs. Amazon AWS EC2 Instances – type m1

Instance Size ProfitBricks DBENCH (MB/s) AWS EC2 DBENCH (MB/s) ProfitBricks Performance Advantage EC2: m1.medium, ProfitBricks equivalent (1 CPU Core/3.75GB RAM)

344.85 27.13 12.7x

EC2: m1.large,

ProfitBricks equivalent (2 CPU cores/7.5GB RAM)

505.05 41.74 12.1x

EC2: m1.xlarge,

ProfitBricks equivalent (4 CPU cores/15GB RAM)

641.31 67.80 9.5x 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

m1.medium m1.large m1.xlarge

D BEN C H (MB/ s) ! ProfitBricks DBECNH (MB/s)! AWS EC2 DBECNH (MB/s)!

(12)

Iperf Results

Iperf is a popular open source network testing tool that creates TCP and UDP data streams

and measures the throughput of the network that it is running on.

In this Iperf benchmark test, ProfitBricks exceeds the performance of Amazon’s new m3 instances by 7.3 to 17x and Amazon’s m1 instances by 4.9 to 7.2x depending on the instance size. These tests were run over three separate days and the results and test configuration can be found on the Iperf test results on the next two pages.

Iperf test configuration:

VMs were configured on both providers for both the client and the server – instances appeared to run on separate hardware to ensure that a local bridge was not used in these tests.

Compile iperf: +./configure(make( Run iperf: Server:+./src/iperf+–s(Client:+./src/iperf+–c+IP_OF!SERVER+–f+m+–t+60+–P+4(

(13)

Iperf Results:

ProfitBricks Cloud Server Instances vs. Amazon AWS EC2 Instances – type m3

Instance Size ProfitBricks Iperf (Mbit/s)

AWS EC2 Iperf (Mbit/s) ProfitBricks Performance Advantage EC2: m3.medium, ProfitBricks equivalent (1 CPU Core/3.75GB RAM) 5112.67 300.11 17.0x EC2: m3.large, ProfitBricks equivalent (2 CPU cores/7.5GB RAM) 5189.67 678.78 7.6x EC2: m3.xlarge, ProfitBricks equivalent (4 CPU cores/15GB 5660.89 778.89 7.3x 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

m3.medium m3.large m3.xlarge

Ip e rf (Mb it /s) !

ProfitBricks Iperf (Mbit/s)! AWS EC2 Iperf (Mbit/s)!

(14)

Iperf Results:

ProfitBricks Cloud Server Instances vs. Amazon AWS EC2 Instances – type m1

Instance Size ProfitBricks Iperf (Mbit/s)

AWS EC2 Iperf (Mbit/s) ProfitBricks Performance Advantage EC2: m1.medium, ProfitBricks equivalent (1 CPU Core/3.75GB RAM) 5112.67 1033.56 4.9x EC2: m1.large, ProfitBricks equivalent (2 CPU cores/7.5GB RAM) 5189.67 717.67 7.2x EC2: m1.xlarge, ProfitBricks equivalent (4 CPU cores/15GB RAM) 5660.89 1120.89 5.1x 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

m1.medium m1.large m1.xlarge

Iperf (Mbit/s)

ProfitBricks Iperf (Mbit/s)! AWS EC2 Iperf (Mbit/s)!

(15)

Next Steps

ProfitBricks is here to help you evaluate us as a cloud provider, from benchmark testing to pricing questions. Our team of knowledgeable cloud service engineers are available by emailing [email protected] or calling 866-852-5229.

ProfitBricks offers a 14-day, no obligation trial account that does not require a credit card for activation. Visit http://www.profitbricks.com/trial today!

Download our Workload-Specific Cloud Computing Performance Benchmarking Report at http://info.profitbricks.com/rs/profitbricks/images/Cloud-Computing-Performance-Workload-Benchmarks-AWS-ProfitBricks.pdf.

Finally, for up-to-the-minute information about our products and services, be sure to check out our Resource Center at http://www.profitbricks.com/press-and-info-center.

ProfitBricks Inc. 15900 La Cantera Pkwy Ste. 19210 San Antonio, TX, 78256 Phone: +1 866 852 5229 Fax: +1 888 620 3376 Email: [email protected] http://www.profitbricks.com twitter.com/profitbricksusa blog.profitbricks.com

References

Related documents

Pre-Existing Condition (Job-based Coverage): Any condition (either physical or mental) including a disability for which medical advice, diagnosis, care, or treatment was recommended

Our objective is to evaluate soft tissue changes (nose, lips and chin) in relation to the underlying hard tissue movements and surgical changes after different surgical approaches

Backup software should include public cloud APIs, enabling simple backup and recovery across major cloud storage vendors, such as Amazon S3, Nirvanix Storage Delivery

When this question was asked last year, we reported that for the first time we observed an increase in the investment made in staff training, and the link between skilled labour

The main objective of the Project on Railway Reservation System is to manage the details of Train, Ticket, Booking, Customer, Payment.. It manages all the information about

Misfit parameter to a sinc shape at the output of the laser (red circles) and peak nonlinear phase shift (blue squares) versus filter bandwidth B for a flat-top spectral pulse

Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is the mycotoxin of Aspergillus flavus fungus which is the most pathogenic and carcinogenic and can affect the health of livestock

F., Kleinman, L., and Fast, J.: Modeling organic aerosols in a megacity: potential contribution of semi-volatile and inter- mediate volatility primary organic compounds to secondary