Texas Medicaid EHR Incentive Program
Medicaid HIT Team
July 23, 2012
Why Health IT?
Benefits of Health IT
A 2011 study* found that 92% of articles
published from July 2007 to February 2010 reached conclusions that showed overall positive effects of health information
technology on key aspects of care, including quality and efficiency of care.
3
* Buntin et al. 2011 “The Benefits of Health Information Technology:
A Review of the Recent Literature Shows Predominantly Positive Results” Health Affairs
http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/30/3/464.short
Benefits of EHR Adoption
Adoption of electronic records by Medicaid providers means better care to the State’s most vulnerable citizens through:
• Enhanced care coordination,
• Improved quality and safety,
• More engagement of the patient and family,
• More complete longitudinal health record, and
• Assistance with decision support, which helps to reduce
errors and cost of care.
Quality of Diabetes Care:
Patients Treated by Physicians using EHR vs. Paper Medical Records
Source: Cebul, R. D., M.D.; et al. (2011). Electronic Health Records and Quality of Diabetes Care. New England Journal of Medicine, 365:825-833. Retrieved from
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa1102519#t=article * Even after adjusting for patient demographic characteristics and insurance type, differences remain significant; p<0.001
% of Patients Receiving Care
5 A significantly higher
proportion of patients being treated by physicians
with EHRs received care that aligns with accepted
treatment standards *
Health Outcomes for Diabetes Patients:
Patients treated by Physicians using EHR vs.
Paper Medical Records
A significantly higher proportion of patients
being treated by physicians with EHRs
obtained better outcomes*
* Even after adjusting for patient demographic characteristics and insurance type,
% of Patients Obtaining Outcome Standards
Source: Cebul, R. D., M.D.; et al. (2011). Electronic Health Records and Quality of
Diabetes Care. New England Journal of Medicine, 365:825-833. Retrieved from
6
* Even after adjusting for patient demographic characteristics and insurance type, differences remain significant; p<0.001
% of Patients Receiving Care
A significantly higher proportion of patients being treated by physicians
with EHRs received care that aligns with accepted
treatment standards *
Source: Cebul, R. D., M.D.; et al. (2011). Electronic Health Records and Quality of Diabetes Care. New England Journal of Medicine, 365:825-833. Retrieved from http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa1102519#t=article
Quality of Diabetes Care at Safety Net Practices:
Patients Treated by Physicians using EHR vs. Paper Medical Records
7
% of Patients Obtaining Outcome Standards
* Even after adjusting for patient demographic characteristics and insurance
A significantly higher proportion of patients
being treated by physicians with EHRs
obtained better outcomes *
Source: Cebul, R. D., M.D.; et al. (2011). Electronic Health Records and Quality of Diabetes Care. New England Journal of Medicine, 365:825-833. Retrieved from
Health Outcomes for Diabetes Patients at Safety Net Practices:
Patients treated by Physicians using EHR vs. Paper Medical Records
8
Texas Medicaid Electronic Health
Record (EHR) Incentive Program
Overview
• Two separate sections of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 comprise the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, which:
• Promotes the adoption and meaningful use of health IT, including EHRs, exchange of health information, etc.
• Authorizes the EHR Incentive Program.
• The EHR Incentive Program incentivizes eligible
medical providers and hospitals for adoption and
meaningful use of certified EHR technology.
Texas Medicaid EHR Incentive Program: Overview
• Eligible professionals (EPs) can receive incentives of up to
$63,750 for the adoption and meaningful use of certified electronic health record (EHR) technology.
• Payment is not a reimbursement for expenses incurred.
• First year payment can be received in 2011 through 2016.
• Final payment can be received up to 2021 for EPs, and 2018 for EHs.
• Incentives are based on the individual, not the practice.
• In the first of year of participation, EPs and EHs must adopt,
implement, or upgrade (AIU) to a certified EHR. In subsequent
participation years, they must demonstrate meaningful use (MU).
• Eligible provider type.
• Physicians (M.D. or D.O.)
• Dentists
• Nurse Practitioners
• Certified Nurse Midwives
• Physician Assistants (PA) in federal qualified health centers (FQHCs) or rural health clinics (RHCs) led by a PA
• Acute care hospitals
• Children’s hospitals
• Must meet Medicaid patient volume thresholds, except children’s hospitals.
• For MU: At least 50% of all encounters must be at a site or sites with certified EHR technology.
• Hospital-based EPs are not eligible for incentives (unless an FQHC or RHC providers).
Eligibility
Payment Year by EP Type Incentive Amount
Maximum cumulative
incentive over 6 years
Year 1 for most EPs $21,250 $63,750
Years 2-6 for most EPs $8,500
Year 1 for pediatricians and pediatric
dentists with a minimum 20%, but less than 30%, Medicaid patient volume
$14,167 $42,500
Years 2-6 for pediatricians and pediatric dentists with a minimum 20%, but less than 30%, Medicaid patient volume
$5,667
Incentive Payments – EPs
Incentive Payments – Hospitals
• The basic calculation is the product of two factors:
• Overall EHR amount.
• The Medicaid share.
• Calculation spreadsheet can be found in the Hospital section of this webpage:
http://www.tmhp.com/Pages/HealthIT/HIT_EHR_GettingStarted.
aspx.
• Payment will be made one time per year.
• Payment will be made in the first monthly date after the incentive is approved.
• Hospital payout schedule for Texas Medicaid is:
• Year 1 – 50 percent
• Year 2 – 40 percent
• Year 3 – 10 percent
Skipping Years in the Program
• Skipping years is permissible in the Medicaid incentive program.
• You may skip one or more years.
• For example, a provider might enter the program in 2011 with AIU and then skip two years. They would re-enter the program in 2014 with Stage 1 (other providers might be in Stage 2 at that point).
• Keep in mind that the program ends in 2021, so if you start in 2016 (the last year you can begin the program), you would need to participate in consecutive years if you want all 6 payments.
Skipping is still allowed, but you wouldn’t receive all 6 payments.
• There are two reporting periods that apply for the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program:
• For patient volume, an eligible professional (EP) should use any continuous, representative 90-day period in the prior calendar year.
• For demonstrating meaningful use, EPs should use the EHR reporting period associated with that payment year:
o First payment year that an EP is demonstrating meaningful use, the reporting period is a continuous 90-day period
within the calendar year.
o Subsequent years, the period is the full calendar year.
Reporting Periods
Provider Type
Medicaid Patient Volume Threshold
Additional Volume Consideration
Eligible Professionals
Physicians 30% If the Medicaid EP
practices predominantly in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) or
Rural Health Clinic (RHC)
— 30% needy individual patient volume
threshold - Pediatricians and Pediatric
Dentists
20%
Dentists 30%
Nurse Practitioners 30%
Certified Nurse Midwives 30%
Physician Assistants (PAs) when practicing at an FQHC/RHC that is led by a PA
30%
Eligible Hospitals Acute Care Hospitals
(includes critical access hospitals)
10%
Children's Hospitals No requirement
Patient Volume Requirements
FQHC Specific Requirements
Practices Predominately: An EP needs to work in an FQHC for over 50 percent of total encounters for a six-month period in most recent calendar year.
Physician Assistants (PA) at an FQHC "so led" by a PA is defined as when a PA is:
• the primary provider in the clinic; or
• a clinical or medical director at the clinic.
If the FQHC is led by a PA, all PAs at that clinic may qualify for the
EHR incentive.
Needy Patient Volume Calculation for FQHCs
Medicaid + CHIP + Other Allowable Patient Encounters X 100 Total Patient Encounters
The methodology for calculating patient volume for FQHCs is the
“Needy Patient” volume calculation. It is based on patient encounters over three full consecutive months that includes:
• Medicaid clients.
• CHIP clients.
• Client services provided as uncompensated care.
• Client services provided at either no cost or reduced cost based
on a sliding scale determined by the individual’s ability to pay.
Meaningful Use Requirements
• Use of certified EHR:
• In a meaningful manner (e.g., electronic prescribing).
• For electronic exchange of health information to improve quality of health care.
• To submit clinical quality measures (CQM) and other such measures selected by the Secretary.
• For Year 1, Medicaid providers do not need to report meaningful use data, only attest to “adopting, implementing, or upgrading” to a certified EHR.
• If a hospital meets meaningful use for Medicare, they meet meaningful use for Medicaid.
Note: For the complete list of reportable measures, go to
http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-
Stage 1—effective in 2012—focuses on:
• Electronically capturing health information in coded format.
• Using that information to track key clinical conditions.
• Communicating that information for care coordination.
• Initiating the reporting of clinical quality measures.
Stage 2—effective in 2014—will focus on:
• Disease and medication management.
• Clinical decision support.
• Support for patient access to their health information.
• Bi-directional communication with public health agencies.
Stage 3—effective in 2015—will focus on:
• Patient access to self-management tools.
• Access to comprehensive patient data.
• Improving population health outcomes. 21
Meaningful Use Stages
20 measures for Eligible Professionals (EPs):
• Must meet 15 from the “core set.”
• Must select 5 of 10 from “menu set.”
EPs must report total of 6 CQMs:
• 3 Core or Alternate Core* CQMs:
• Core: Blood pressure reading, tobacco use assessment and intervention, adult weight screen and follow up.
• Alternate Core: Flu immunization for patients 50+, weight assessment and counseling for children and adolescents, and childhood immunization status.
• 3 from list of clinical measures of the provider’s choice.
Must include at least one Public Health measure:
1) Immunizations 2) Reportable Labs
3) Syndromic Surveillance
EPs: Stage 1 Meaningful Use and Clinical Quality Measures
* Insofar as the denominator for one or more of the core measures is zero,
19 measures for Eligible Hospitals (EHs):
• Must meet 14 from the “core set.”
• Must select 5 of 10 from “menu set.”
Hospitals must report 15 CQMs:
• 4 CQM overlap with CHIPRA initial core set.
Must include at least one Public Health measure:
1) Immunizations 2) Reportable Labs
3) Syndromic Surveillance
Hospitals: Stage 1 Meaningful Use
and Clinical Quality Measures
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Process Flow
Federal/State File Exchange
Register
with CMS NLR
Generate Payment State and Federal Validations
Acknowledge Payment Validate
Certified EHR Confirm AIU
Enter Patient Volumes
Federal Level Registration
State Level
Enrollment Email Notifications