• No results found

Linear and nonlinear abstract elliptic equations with VMO coefficients and applications

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Linear and nonlinear abstract elliptic equations with VMO coefficients and applications"

Copied!
21
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

R E S E A R C H

Open Access

Linear and nonlinear abstract elliptic

equations with

VMO

coefficients and

applications

Veli B Shakhmurov

*

*Correspondence:

[email protected] Department of Mechanical Engineering, Okan University, Akfirat, Tuzla, Istanbul 34959, Turkey

Abstract

In this paper, maximal regularity properties for linear and nonlinear elliptic

differential-operator equations withVMO(vanishing mean oscillation) coefficients are studied. For linear case, the uniform separability properties for parameter dependent boundary value problems is obtained inLpspaces. Then the existence and uniqueness of a strong solution of the boundary value problem for a nonlinear equation

is established. In application, the maximal regularity properties of the anisotropic elliptic equation and the system of equations withVMOcoefficients are derived. MSC: 58I10; 58I20; 35Bxx; 35Dxx; 47Hxx; 47Dxx

Keywords: differential equations withVMOcoefficients; boundary value problems; differential-operator equations; maximalLpregularity; abstract function spaces; nonlinear elliptic equations

1 Introduction

The goal of the present paper is to study the nonlocal boundary value problems (BVPs) for parameter dependent linear differential-operator equations (DOEs) with discontinuous top-order coefficients,

sa(x)u()(x) +A(x)u(x) +sA(x)u()(x) +A(x)u(x) +λu(x) =f(x), () and the nonlinear equation

a(x)u()(x) +Bx,u,u()u(x) =Fx,u,u(),

where a is a complex valued function,s is a positive, λ is a complex parameter, and A=A(x),Ai=Ai(x) are linear andBis a nonlinear operator in a Banach spaceE. Here,

the principal coefficientsaandAmay be discontinuous. More precisely, we assume that aandA(·)A–(x

) belong to the operator-valued Sarason classVMO. The Sarason class VMOwas first defined in []. In the recent years, there has been considerable interest in elliptic and parabolic equations withVMOcoefficients. This is mainly due to the fact that theVMOclass contains as a subspaceC(¯) that ensures the extension ofLp-theory of

operators with continuous coefficients to discontinuous coefficients (see,e.g., [–]). On the other hand, the Sobolev spacesW,n() andWσ,σn(),  <σ< , are also contained in

VMO. Global regularity of the Dirichlet problem for elliptic equations withVMO

(2)

cients has been studied in [–]. We refer to the survey [], where an excellent presenta-tion and relapresenta-tions with another similar results can be found concerning the regularizing properties of these operators in the framework of Sobolev spaces.

It is known that many classes of PDEs (partial differential equations), pseudo DEs and integro DEs can be expressed in the form of DOEs. Many researchers (see,e.g., [–]) investigated similar spaces of functions and classes of PDEs under a single DOE. Moreover, the maximal regularity properties of DOEs with continuous coefficients were studied,e.g., in [, , ].

Here, the equation with top-orderVMO-operator coefficients is considered in abstract spaces. We shall prove the uniform separability of the problem (),i.e., we show that, for eachfLp(, ;E), there exists a unique strong solutionuof the problem () and a positive

constantCdepending only onp,γ,EandAsuch that 

i=

si|λ|–iu(i)

Lp(,;E)+AuLp(,;E)CfLp(,;E).

Note that the principal part of a corresponding differential operator is nonselfadjoint. Nevertheless, the sharp uniform coercive estimate for the resolvent and Fredholmness are established. Then the existence and uniqueness of the above nonlinear problem is derived. In application, we study maximal regularity properties of anisotropic elliptic equations in mixedLp spaces and the systems (finite or infinite) of differential equations withVMO

coefficients in the scalarLpspace.

Since () involves unbounded operators, it is not easy to get representation for the Green function and estimate of solutions. Therefore, we use the modern harmonic analysis el-ements,e.g., the Hilbert operators and the commutator estimates inE-valuedLpspaces,

embedding theorems of Sobolev-Lions spaces and some semigroups estimates to over-come these difficulties. Moreover, we also use our previous results on equations with con-tinuous leading coefficients and the perturbation theory of linear operators to obtain our main assertions.

2 Notations and background

Throughout the paper, we setE to be a Banach space andRn.Lp(;E) denotes the

space of all strongly measurableE-valued functions that are defined onwith the norm fp=fLp(;E)=

f(x)pEdx

p

, ≤p<∞.

BMO(E) (bounded mean oscillation) (see [, ]) is the space of allE-valued local inte-grable functions with the norm

sup

B

B

f(x) –fBEdx=f∗,E<∞,

whereBranges in the class of the balls inRnandf

Bis the average|B|Bf(x)dx.

ForfBMO(E) andr> , we set

sup ρ≤r

B

f(x) –fBEdx=η(r),

(3)

We will say that a functionfBMO(E) is inVMO(E) iflimr→+η(r) = . We will call the

η(r) aVMOmodulus off.

Note that, ifE=C, whereCis the set of complex numbers, thenBMO(E) andVMO(E) coincide with the John-Nirenberg classBMOand Sarason classVMO, respectively.

The Banach spaceEis called aUMD(unconditional martingale difference)-space if the Hilbert operator

(Hf)(x) =lim ε→

|x–y|>ε f(y) xydy

is bounded inLp(R,E),p∈(,∞) (see,e.g., [, ]).UMDspaces include,e.g.,Lp,lpspaces

and Lorentz spacesLpq,p,q∈(,∞).

Let

=

λC,|argλ| ≤ϕ∪ {}, ≤ϕ<π.

A linear operatorAis said to be aϕ-positive (or positive) in a Banach spaceEwith the boundM>  ifD(A) is dense onEand

(A+λI)–L(E)M +|λ|–

forλ,ϕ∈(,π],Iis an identity operator inEandL(E) is the space of bounded linear

operators inE. Sometimes instead ofA+λI, it will be written asA+λand denoted by.

It is known [, §..] that there exist fractional powers of the positive operatorA.

LetE() denote the spaceD(Aθ) with the graphical norm

uE()=

up+Aθ up

p, p<, –<θ<.

Let E andE be two Banach spaces. A setWL(E,E) is called R-bounded (see [, ]) if there is a positive constant C such that for all T,T, . . . ,TmW and

u,u, . . . ,umE,mN

m

j=

rj(y)Tjuj

EdyC

m

j= rj(y)uj

Edy,

where {rj} is a sequence of independent symmetric{–, }-valued random variables on

[, ].

Let S(Rn;E) denote the Schwarz class,i.e., the space of all E-valued rapidly

decreas-ing smooth functions onRn. LetF denote the Fourier transformation. A function

L∞(Rn;B(E

,E)) is called a Fourier multiplier fromLp(Rn;E) to Lp(Rn;E) if the map uu=F–(ξ)Fu,uS(Rn;E) is well defined and extends to a bounded linear

op-erator

:Lp

Rn;E

Lp

Rn;E

.

The set of all multipliers fromLp(Rn;E) toLp(Rn;E) will be denoted byMpp(E,E). For

(4)

Let

Un=

β= (β,β, . . . ,βn)∈Nn:βk∈ {, }

.

Definition  A Banach spaceE is said to be a space satisfying the multiplier condition if, for anyC(n)(Rn;L(E)), theR-boundedness of the set{ξβDβ

ξ(ξ) :ξRn\,βUn}

implies thatis a Fourier multiplier inLp(Rn;E),i.e.,Mpp(E) for anyp∈(,∞). Definition  Theϕ-positive operatorAis said to be anR-positive in a Banach spaceEif there existsϕ∈[,π) such that the setLA={A(A+λ)–:λ}isR-bounded.

A linear operatorA(x) is said to be positive inEuniformly inxifD(A(x)) is independent ofx,D(A(x)) is dense inEand

A(x) +λ–≤M +|λ|–

for allλS(ϕ),ϕ∈[,π).

Letσ(E,E) denote the space of all compact operators fromEtoE. ForE=E=E, it is denoted byσ∞(E).

AssumeEandEare two Banach spaces andEis continuously and densely embedded intoE. Letmbe a natural number.Wm,p(;E,E) (the so-called Sobolev-Lions type space)

denotes a space of all functionsuLp(;E) possessing the generalized derivativesDm ku=

∂mu

∂xmk such thatD m

kuLp(;E) endowed with the norm

uWm,p(;E

,E)=uLp(;E)+

n

k=

DmkuLp(;E)<∞.

ForE=E, the spaceWm,p(;E,E) will be denoted byWm,p(;E). It is clear that

Wm,p(;E,E) =Wm,p(;E)∩Lp(;E).

Let s be a positive parameter. We define inWm,p(;E

,E) the following parameter-dependent norm:

uWm,p

s (;E,E)=uLp(;E)+

n

k=

sDmkuLp(;E).

The spaceBs

p,p(;E,E) is defined as a trace space forWm,p(;E,E) as in a scalar case

(see,e.g., [, §..]).

Function uW,p(, ;E(A),E,L

k) = {u ∈ W,p(, ;E(A),E),Lku = } satisfying the

equation () a.e. on (, ) is said to be a solution of the problem () on (, ). From [] we have

Theorem ASuppose the following conditions are satisfied:

(5)

() α= (α,α, . . . ,αn)arentuples of nonnegative integer numbers such thatκ=|mα|≤

and <μ≤ –κ;

() Rnis a region such that there exists a bounded linear extension operator from

Wm,p(;E(A),E)toWm,p(Rn;E(A),E). Then the embedding

Wm,p;E(A),ELp;EA–κ–μ

is continuous and there exists a positive constant Cμsuch that

s||Dαu

Lp(;E(A–κ–μ))

u

Wsm,p(;E(A),E)+h

–(–μ)u

Lp(;E)

for all uWm,p(;E(A),E)and <hh

<∞.

Theorem ASuppose all the conditions of Theorem A are satisfied. Assume is a bounded region in Rnand A–σ

∞(E).Then,for <μ≤ –κ,the embedding DαWm,p;E(A),ELp;EA–κ–μ

is compact.

In a similar way as in [, Theorem .], we have the following result.

Lemma ALet E be a Banach space and fVMO(E).The following conditions are equiv-alent:

() fVMO(E);

() f is in theBMOclosure of the set of uniformly continuous functions which belong to VMO;

() limy→f(xy) –f(x)∗,E= .

For fLp(;E),p(,),aL(Rn),consider the commutator operator

H[a,f](x) =a(x)Hf(x) –H(af)(x) =lim ε→

|x–y|>ε,

[a(x) –a(y)] xy f(y)dy.

From [, Theorem ] and [, Corollary .], we have

Theorem ALet E be a UMD space and aVMOL∞(Rn).Then H[a,f]is a bounded operator in Lp(R;E),p(,).

From Theorem Aand the property () of Lemma A we obtain, respectively, the fol-lowing.

Theorem A Assume all the conditions of TheoremAare satisfied.Also,let aVMOL∞(Rn)and let ηbe the VMO modulus of a.Then,for any ε> ,there exists a positive numberδ=δ(ε,η)such that

(6)

Theorem ALet E be a UMD space and A(·)uniformly R-positive in E.Moreover, let A(·)A–(x)∈L∞(R;L(E))∩BMO(L(E)),x∈R.Then the commutator operator

H[A,f](x) =A(x)A–(x)Hf(x) –H

A(x)A–(x)f

(x)

=lim ε→

|x–y|>ε,

[A(x)A–(x) –A(y)A–(x)] xy f(y)dy

is bounded in Lp(R;E),p∈(,∞).

Theorem AAssume all the conditions of TheoremAare satisfied andηis a VMO mod-ulus of A(·)A–(x).

Then,for anyε> ,there exists a positive numberδ=δ(ε,η)such that H[A,f]Lp(

r;E)≤MεfLp(r;E), r∈(,δ).

Consider the nonlocal BVP for a parameter dependent DOE with constant coefficients

(L+λ)u=sau()(x) + (A+λ)u(x) =f(x), x∈(, ) ,

Lku= mk

i= sμiα

kiu(i)() +βkiu(i)()

=fk, k= , , ()

where mk∈ {, },a,αki,βkiare complex numbers,s is a positive parameter,λis a complex

spectral parameter,μi=i +p,θk=mk +p,=A+λand A is a linear operator in E. Letω,ωbe roots of the equation aω+  = and let

αk=αkmk, βk=βkmk, μ=

(–ω)mα

βωm (–ω)mα

βωm .

It is known that if the operator A isϕ-positive in E,then operatorsωkA

 

λ,k= , generate analytic semigroups

Uλs(x) =s– A

 

λx, Uλs(x) =eωs– A  

λ(–x) forλS(ϕ).

Let

Ek=

E(A),Eθ

k,p.

From [, Theorem ] and [, Theorem .], we obtain

Theorem AAssume the following conditions are satisfied:

() Eis a Banach space satisfying the multiplier condition with respect top∈(,∞); () Ais anR-positive operator inEfor≤ϕ<πandμ= ;

(7)

Then

()for fLp(, ;E),fkEk,λS(ϕ)and for sufficiently large|λ|,the problem()has a

unique solution uW,p(, ;E(A),E).Moreover,the coercive uniform estimate holds

i=

si|λ|–iu(i)

Lp(,;E)+AuLp(,;E)C

fLp(,;E)+

k= fkEk

.

()For fk= ,the solution is represented as

u(x) = 

Gλs(x,y)f(y)dy, ()

Gλs(x,y) =

i,j=

m

k=

Bij(λ)

s–

–(+mik–)U

jλs(x)Uλs( –y)

+ 

i,j=

m

k=

Dij(λ)A

–(+mik–)

λ Ujλs(x)Uλs(y)

+Uλs(xy),

where Bij(λ)and Dij(λ)are uniformly bounded operators in E and

Uλs(xy) =

⎧ ⎨ ⎩

a–sA–

λ Uλs(xy), xy,

a–sA–  

λ Uλs(xy), xy.

Consider the BVP for a DOE with variable coefficients

sa(x)u()(x) +A(x) +λu(x) =f(x), x∈(, ), Lku=

mk

i= sθkα

kiu(i)() +βkiu(i)()

= , k= , , ()

wherea=a(x) is a complex valued function,sis a positive parameter,mk∈ {, },αki,βki

are complex numbers,λis a spectral parameter,θk=mk +p andA(x) is a linear operator

inE.

Letω=ω(x),ω=ω(x) be roots of the equationa(x)ω+  =  and let

αk=αkmk, βk=βkmk, μ(x) =

(–ω)mα

βωm (–ω)mαβωm .

In the next theorem, let us consider the case that principal coefficients are continuous. The well-posedness of this problem occurs in the studying of equations withVMO coef-ficients. From [, Theorem ] and [, Theorem .], we get

Theorem ASuppose the following conditions are satisfied:

() Eis a Banach space satisfying the multiplier condition with respect top∈(,∞); () aC[, ],–aS(ϕ),a() =a(),andμ(x)= for a.e.x∈[, ];

() Reωk(x)=  andωλkS(ϕ)forλS(ϕ),k= , .a.e.x∈[, ];

() A(x)is a uniformlyR-positive operator inEand

(8)

Then,for all fLp(, ;E),λS(ϕ)and for sufficiently large|λ|,there is a unique solution

uW,p(, ;E(A),E)of the problem().Moreover,the following coercive uniform estimate

holds:

i=

si|λ|–iu(i)

Lp(,;E)+AuLp(,;E)≤CfLp(,;E).

3 DOEs with VMO coefficients

Consider the principal part of the problem ()

(L+λ)u=sa(x)u()(x) +A(x) +λu(x) =f(x), x∈(, ), Lku=

mk

i= sμiα

kiu(i)() +βkiu(i)()

= , k= , . ()

Condition  Assume the following conditions are satisfied: () Eis aUMDspace,p∈(,∞);

() aVMOL∞(R),ηis aVMOmodulus ofa,–aS(ϕ),μ(x)= ; () Reωk(x)= andωλkS(ϕ)forλS(ϕ),≤ϕ<π,k= , . a.e.x∈[, ];

() A(x)is a uniformlyR-positive operator inEand

A(·)A–(x)∈L∞, ;L(E)∩VMOL(E), x∈(, );

() a() =a(),A() =A()andηis aVMOmodulus ofA(·)A–(x). First, we obtain an integral representation formula for solutions.

Lemma  Let Conditionhold and fLp(, ;E).Then,for all solutions u of the problem

()belonging to W,p(, ;E(A),E),we have

u(i)(x) = 

iλs(x,xy)

a(x) –a(y)u()(y)

+A(x) –A(y)u(y) +f(y)dy+f(x), ()

A(x)u(x) = 

λs(x,xy)a(x) –a(y)u()(y) +A(x) –A(y)u(y) +f(y)dy+f(x),

where

iλs(x,xy) = 

i,j=

m

k=

Bij(λ)s–

(+mkki–)

Ujλs(x)Uλs( –y)

+ 

i,j=

m

k=

Dij(λ)s–

(+mkki–)

Ujλs(x)Uλs(y)

(9)

here Bij(λ),Dij(λ)are uniformly bounded operators,

λs(xy) =

⎧ ⎨ ⎩

ωia–s(–ν)/A–(–ν)/

λ Uλs(xy), xy,

ωia–s(–ν)/A–(–ν)/

λ Uλs(xy), xy,

and the expressionλ(x,xy)is a scalar multiple ofλ(x,xy). Proof Consider the problem () fora(x) =a(x) andA(x) =A(x),i.e.,

(L+λ)u=sa(x)u()(x) +

A(x) +λ

u(x) =f(x), x∈(, ),

Lku= mk

i= sμiα

kiu(i)() +βkiu(i)()

= , k= , . ()

LetuC()([, ];E(A)) be a solution of the problem (). Taking into account the equality Lu= (L–L)u+Luand Theorem A, we get

u(i)(x) = 

iλs(x,xy)

a(x) –a(y)u()(y)

+A(x) –A(y)

u(y) +f(y)dy+f(x),

A(x)u(x) = 

λs(x,xy)a(x) –a(y)

u()(y)

+A(x) –A(y)u(y) +f(y)dy+f(x).

Settingx=xin above, we get () foruC()([, ];E(A)). Then the density argument, using Theorem A, gives the conclusion for

uW,p, ;E(A),E, Lku= .

Consider the problem () on (,b),i.e.,

(Lb+λ)u=sa(x)u()(x) +

A(x) +λu(x) =f(x), x∈(,b), Lbku=

mk

i= sμiα

kiu(i)() +βkiu(i)(b)

= , k= , . ()

Theorem  Suppose Conditionis satisfied.Then there exists a number b∈(, )such that the uniform coercive estimate

i=

si|λ|–iu(i)

Lp(,b;E)+AuLp(,b;E)C(Lb+λ)u

Lp(,b;E) ()

holds for large enough|λ|and uW,p(,b;E(A),E),L

bku= ,λS(ϕ),where C is a

(10)

Proof By Lemma , for any solutionuW,p(,b;E(A),E) of the problem (), we have

u(i)(x) = b

ibλs(x,xy)

a(x) –a(y)u()(y)

+A(x) –A(y)u(y) +f(y)dy+f(x), ()

where

ibλs(x,xy) =

i,j=

m

k=

Bij(λ)s–

(+mkki–)

Ujλ(x)Uλ(by)

+ 

i,j=

m

k=

Dij(λ)s–

–(+mkki–)U

(x)Uλ(y)

+λs(xy), ν= , , , ()

hereBij(λ),Dij(λ) are uniformly bounded operators,

Uλ(x) =s – A

λx, Uλ(x) =eωs– A  

λ(bx)

and

Uνλs(xy) = ⎧ ⎨ ⎩

ωi

a–s(–ν)/A –(–ν)/

λ Uλs(xy), xy,

ωia–s(–ν)/A–(–ν)/

λ Uλs(xy), xy,

ν= , , .

Moreover, from () and (), clearly, we get

Au(x) = b

bλs(x,xy)a(x) –a(y)u()(y) +A(x) –A(y)u(y) +f(y)dy, ()

where the expressionbλ(x,xy) differs from(x,xy) only by a constant.

Consider the operators

Bλf = 

Gbλs(x,y)f(y)dy, Biλsf =

b

ibλs(x,xy)f(y)dy,

Siλu= b

ibλ(x,xy)

a(x) –a(y)u()(y)dy,

Diλsu=

b

ibλs(x,xy)

A(x) –A(y)u(y)dy, i= , , ,

λsu=

b

bλs(x,xy)a(x) –a(y)u()(y)dy,

λu= b

bλ(x,xy)A(x) –A(y)u(y)dy.

Since the operatorsBλandBλare regular onLp(,b;E), by using the positivity

(11)

we get

BiλfLp(,b;E)M|λ|–

–i

 fLp(,b;E), i= , . ()

Since the Hilbert operator is bounded inLp(R;E) for a UMD spaceE, we have

BλfLp(,b;E)MfLp(,b;E). ()

Thus, by virtue of Theorems A, Aand in view of ()-() for anyε> , there exists a positive numberb=b(ε,η,η) such that

SiλuLp(,b;E)|λ|–

–i

u()

Lp(,b;E),

DiλuLp(,b;E)|λ|–

–i

A(x)u

Lp(,b;E), i= , , , ()

λuLp(,b;E)Mεu()

Lp(,b;E), λuLp(,b;E)MεA(x)u Lp(,b;E).

Hence, the estimates ()-() imply ().

Theorem  Assume Conditionholds.Let uW,p(, ;E(A),E)be a solution of().Then,

for sufficiently large|λ|,λS(ϕ),the following coercive uniform estimate holds: 

i=

si|λ|–iu(i)

Lp(,;E)+AuLp(,;E)C(L+λ)u

Lp(,;E)+uLp(,;E). ()

Proof This fact is shown by a covering and flattening argument, in a similar way as in Theorem A. Particularly, by partition of unity, the problem is localized. Choosing diam-eters of supports for corresponding finite functions, by using Theorem , Theorems A, A, A and embedding Theorem A (see the same technique for DOEs with continuous coefficients [, ]), we obtain the assertion.

LetQsdenote the operator inLp(, ;E) generated by the problem () forλ= ,i.e.,

D(Qs) =W,p

, ;E(A),E,Lk

, Qsu=sa(x)u()+A(x)u.

Theorem  Assume Conditionholds.Then,for all fLp(, ;E),λS(ϕ)and for large

enough|λ|,the problem()has a unique solution uW,p(, ;E(A),E).Moreover,the

fol-lowing coercive uniform estimate holds:

i=

si|λ|–iu(i)

Lp(,;E)+AuLp(,;E)CfLp(,;E). ()

Proof First, let us show that the operatorQ+λhas a left inverse. Really, it is clear that uLp(,;E)=

|λ|(Qs+λ)uLp(,;E)+QsuLp(,;E)

.

By Theorem AforuW,p(, ;E(A),E), we have

QsuLp(,;E)Cu

(12)

Then, by virtue of () and in view of the above relations, we infer, for alluW,p(, ;

E(A),E) and sufficiently large|λ|, that there is a smallεandC(ε) such that 

i=

si|λ|–iu(i)

Lp(,;E)+AuLp(,;E)

C(Qs+λ)uLp(,;E)+εuW,p(,;E(A),E)+C(ε)(Qs+λ)u Lp(,;E)

. ()

From the estimate () foruW,p(, ;E(A),E), we get

i=

si|λ|–iu(i)

Lp(,;E)+AuLp(,;E)C(Q+λ)u

Lp(,;E). ()

The estimate () implies that () has a unique solution and the operatorQs+λhas a

bounded inverse in its rank space. We need to show the rank space coincides with all the spaceLp(, ;E). It suffices to prove that there is a solutionuW,p(, ;E(A),E) for

all fLp(, ;E). This fact can be derived in a standard way, approximating the

equa-tion with a similar one with smooth coefficients [, ]. More precisely, by virtue of [, Theorem .],UMDspaces satisfy the multiplier condition. Moreover, by the part

() of Lemma A, given aVMO with VMO modules η(r), we can find a sequence

of mollifiers functions {ah} converging to a in BMOas h→ with a VMOmodulus

ηh such thatηh(r)≤η(r). In a similar way, it can be derived for the operator function

A(x)A–(x

)∈VMO(L(E)).

Result  Theorem  implies that the resolvent (Qs+λ)–satisfies the following sharp

uni-form estimate:

i=

si|λ|–id

i

dxi(Qs+λ)

–

L(Lp(,;E))

+A(Qs+λ)–L(Lp(,;E))C ()

for|argλ| ≤ϕ,ϕ∈(,π) ands> .

The estimate () particularly implies that the operator Q is uniformly positive in Lp(, ;E) and generates analytic semigroups forϕ∈(π,π) (see,e.g., [, §..]).

Remark  Conditionsa() =a(),A() =A() arise due to nonlocality of the boundary conditions (). If the boundary conditions are local, then the conditions mentioned above are not required any more.

Consider the problem (), whereLkuis the same boundary condition as in (). LetOs

denote a differential operator generated by the problem (). We will show the separability and Fredholmness of ().

Theorem  Assume () Conditionholds;

() for anyε> ,there isC(ε) > such that for a.e.x∈(, )and for <ν< , <ν<, A(x)uEεAuE+C(ε)uE, uE(A),

A(x)uEεu(E(A),E)  ,∞

(13)

Then,for all fLp(, ;E)and for large enough|λ|,λS(ϕ),there is a unique solution

uW,p(, ;E(A),E)of the problem()and the following coercive uniform estimate holds:

i=

si|λ|–iu(i)

Lp(,;E)+AuLp(,;E)CfLp(,;E). ()

Proof It is sufficient to show that the operatorOs+λhas a bounded inverse (Os+λ)–

fromLp(, ;E) toW,p(, ;E(A),E). PutO

su=Qsu+Qu, where

Qu=s  A

u()+Au,uW,p

, ;E(A),E,Lk

.

By the second assumption and Theorem A, there is a smallεandC(ε) such that AuLp(,;E)CA–νu

Lp(,;E)

εu

Ws,p(,;E(A),E)+C(ε)uL p(,;E),

s A

u()Lp(,;E)Cs

A–νu

Lp(,;E)

εuW,p

s (,;E(A),E)+C(ε)uL p(,;E).

()

In view of estimates () and (), we have

AuLp(,;E)<δQsuLp(,;E),

sAu()

Lp(,;E)<δQsuLp(,;E)

()

foruW,p(, ;E(A),E) andδ

k< . By Theorem , the operatorQs+λhas a bounded

inverse (Qs+λ)– fromLp(, ;E) toW,p(, ;E(A),E) for sufficiently large|λ|. So, ()

implies the following uniform estimate:

Q(Qs+λ)–L(Lp(,;E))< .

It is clear that

(Os+λ) =

I+Q(Qs+λ)–

(Qs+λ),

(Os+λ)–= (Q+λ)–

I+Q(Qs+λ)–

– .

Then, by above relation and by virtue of Theorem , we get the assertion.

Theorem  implies the following result.

Result  Suppose all the conditions of Theorem  are satisfied. Then the resolvent (Os+

λ)–of the operatorO

ssatisfies the following sharp uniform estimate:

i=

si|λ|–id

i

dxi(Os+λ)

–

L(Lp(,;E))

+A(Os+λ)–L(Lp(,;E))C

(14)

Consider the problem () forλ= ,i.e.,

Lu=sa(x)u()(x) +A(x)u(x) +A(x)u()+A(x)u=f(x), x∈(, ),

Lku= mk

i= sμiα

kiu(i)() +βkiu(i)()

= , k= , . ()

Theorem  Assume all the conditions of Theoremhold and A–σ

∞(E).Then the

prob-lem()is Fredholm from W,p(, ;E(A),E)into Lp(, ;E).

Proof Theorem  implies that the operatorOs+λhas a bounded inverse (Os+λ)–from

Lp(, ;E) toW,p(, ;E(A),E) for large enough|λ|; that is, the operatorO

s+λis Fredholm

fromW,p(, ;E(A),E) intoLp(, ;E). Then, by virtue of Theorem A

and by perturbation

theory of linear operators, we obtain the assertion.

4 Nonlinear DOEs with VMO coefficients

Let, at first, consider the linear BVP in a moving domain (,b(s)),

a(x)u()(x) +A(x)u(x) +A(x)u()(x) +A(x)u(x) =f(x), ()

Lju= mj

i=

αjiu(i)() +βjiu(i)(b)

= , j= , ,

whereais a complex valued function, andA=A(x),Ai=Ai(x) are possible operators in a

Banach spaceE, whereb(s) is a positive continuous independent ofu. Theorem  implies the following result.

Result  Let all the conditions of Theorem  be satisfied. Then the problem (), for fLp(,b(s);E),p(,), λS

ϕ and for large enough|λ|, has a unique solutionuW,p(,b;E(A),E) and the following coercive uniform estimate holds:

i=

|λ|–iu(i)

Lp(,b;E)+AuLp(,b;E)≤ fLp(,b;E).

Proof Really, under the substitutionτ =xb(s), the moving boundary problem () maps to the following BVP with a parameter in a fixed domain (, ):

b–(s)a˜(τ)u()(τ) + (A˜ +λ)u(τ) +b–(s)A˜(τ)u()(τ) +A˜(τ)u(τ) =f(τ),

mj

i=

bi(s)αjiu(i)() +βjiu(i)()

= , j= , ,

where

τ∈(, ), A˜ =Aτb–(s), A˜i=Ai

τb–(s).

(15)

Consider the nonlinear problem

a(x)u()(x) +B(x,u,ux)u(x) =F(x,u,ux), () mk

i=

αkiu(i)() +βkiu(i)(a)

= , k= , ,

wheremk∈ {, },αki,βkiare complex numbers,x∈(,b), wherebis a positive number in

(,b].

In this section, we will prove the existence and uniqueness of a maximal regular solution of the nonlinear problem (). AssumeAis aϕ-positive operator in a Banach spaceE. Let

X=Lp(,b;E), Y=W,p,b;E(A),E,

Ej=

E(A),Eσ

j,p, σj=

 +jp

p , X=

j= Ej.

Remark  By using [, §.], we obtain that the embeddingDjYE

jis continuous and

there exists the constantCsuch that forwY,W={w,w},wj=Djw(·),j= , ,

wX,∞= 

j=

DjwC([,b],Ej)= sup

x∈[,b] 

j=

Djw(x)EjCwY.

Condition  Assume the following are satisfied: () η= (–)mα

β– (–)mαβ= anda(x)is a positive continuous function on[,b], a() =a(b);

() Eis a UMD space andp∈(,∞);

() F(x,υ,υ) : [,bX→Eis a measurable function for eachυiEi,i= , ;

F(x,·,·)is continuous with respect tox∈[,b]andf(x) =F(x, )∈X. Moreover, for eachR> , there existsμRsuch that

F(x,U) –F(x,U¯)EμRU–U¯ X,

whereU={u,u}andU¯ ={¯u,u¯}for a.a.x∈[,b],ui,u¯iEiand

UX≤R, ¯UX≤R.

() forU={u,u} ∈X, the operatorB(x,U)isR-positive inEuniformly with respect tox∈[,b];B(x,U)B–(x,U)C([,b];B(E)), where the domain definition D(B(x,U))does not depend onxandU;B(x,W) : (,bX→B(E(A),E)is continuous, whereA=A(x) =B(x,W)for fixedW={w,w} ∈X;

() for eachR> , there is a positive constantL(R)such that

[B(x,U) –B(x,U¯)]υEL(R)U–U¯ XAυEforx∈(,b),U,U¯ ∈X,

UX, ¯UX≤RandυD(A)andA() =A(b).

Theorem  Let Conditionhold.Then there is b∈(,b]such that the problem()has a unique solution that belongs to the space W

(16)

Proof Consider the linear problem

a(x)w()(x) +A(x) +dw(x) =f(x), ()

Lkw= mk

i=

αkiw(i)() +βkiw(i)(b) = ,

where

f(x) =F(x, ), x∈(,b).

By virtue of Result , the problem () has a unique solution for allfXand for sufficiently larged>  that satisfies the following

wYCfX,

where the constantC does not depend onfXandb∈(,b]. We want to solve the problem () locally by means of maximal regularity of the linear problem () via the contraction mapping theorem. For this purpose, letwbe a solution of the linear BVP (). Consider a ball

Br=

υY,Lkυ= ,k= , ,υwYr

.

ForυBr, consider the linear problem

a(x)u()(x) +Au(x) +du=F(x,V) +B(,W) –B(x,V)υ, () Lku=

mk

i=

αkiu(i)() +βkiu(i)(b) = ,

where

V=υ,υ(), W=w,w().

Define a mapQonBr by=u, whereu is a solution of the problem (). We want

to show thatQ(Br)⊂Br and thatQis a contraction operator provided bis sufficiently

small andris chosen properly. For this aim, by using maximal regularity properties of the problem (), we have

QυwY=u–wYCF(x,V) –F(x, )X+B(,W) –B(x,V)

υX. By assumption (), we have

B(,W)υB(x,V)υX

≤ sup

x∈[,b]

B(,W) –B(x,W)υB(X

,X)+B(x,W) –B(x,V)B(X,X)υY

δ(b) +L(R)W–V∞,X

υwY+wY

(17)

δ(b) +L(R)CυwY+υwY

υwY+wY

δ(b) +L(R)[Cr+r]

r+wY

,

where

δ(b) = sup

x∈[,b]

B(,W) –B(x,W)B(X ,X).

Bearing in mind

F(x,V) –F(x, , )Eδ(b) +F(x,V) –F(x,W)E+F(x,W) –F(x, )Eδ(b) +μR

υwY+wY

μRC

υwY+wY

μR

Cr+wY

,

whereR=Cr+wYis a fixed number. In view of the above estimates, by a suitable choice

ofμR,LRand for sufficiently smallb∈[;b), we have

QυwYr,

i.e.,

Q(Br)⊂Br.

Moreover, in a similar way, we obtain

Qυ¯YC

μRC+Ma+L(R)

υwY+Cr

+L(R)C

r+wY

υυ¯Y

+δ(b).

By a suitable choice ofμR, LR and for sufficiently smallb∈(,b), we obtain ¯Y<ηυυ¯Y,η< ,i.e.,Qis a contraction operator. Eventually, the contraction

map-ping principle implies a unique fixed point ofQinBrwhich is the unique strong solution

uY.

5 Boundary value problems for anisotropic elliptic equations with VMO coefficients

The Fredholm property of BVPs for elliptic equations with parameters in smooth domains were studied,e.g., in [, ], also, for nonsmooth domains, these questions were investi-gated,e.g., in [].

LetRnbe an open connected set with a compactCm-boundary. Let us con-sider the nonlocal boundary value problems on a cylindrical domainG= (, )×for the following anisotropic elliptic equation withVMOtop-order coefficients:

(L+λ)u=sa(x)u

∂x +s

d(x,y)∂u

∂x+d(x,y)u

+

|α|≤m

(18)

Lku= mk

i= sμiα

kiu(xi)(,y) +βkiu(xi)(,y)

= , k= , , ()

Bju=

|β|≤mj

bjβ(y)Dβyu(x,y) = , x∈(, ),y,j= , , . . . ,m, ()

wheresis a positive parameter,a,diare complex valued functions,αkiandβkiare complex

numbers,

Dj= –i

∂yj

, mk∈ {, }, y= (y, . . . ,yn), μi=

i +

 p.

IfG= (, )×,p= (p,p),Lp(G) will denote the space of allp-summable scalar-valued functions with a mixed norm (see,e.g., [, §]),i.e., the space of all measurable functions f defined onG, for which

fLp(G)= 

f(x,y)pdy

p p

dx

p

<∞.

Analogously,W,m,p(G) denotes the anisotropic Sobolev space with the corresponding

mixed norm [, §].

Theorem  Let the following conditions be satisfied;

() a,d∈VMOL∞(R),a() =a(),–aS(ϕ),μ(x)= ,a.e.x∈[, ]; () Reωk= and ωλ

kS(ϕ)forλS(ϕ),≤ϕ<π,k= , a.e.x∈[, ];

() d∈L∞,d(·,y)d  –ν

 (·)∈L∞(, )for a.e.yand <ν<;

() VMOL∞(Rn)for each|α|= mandaα∈[L∞+Lγk]()for each|α|=k< m withrkqandmk>rl

k;

() bjβCmmj()for eachj,βandmj< m,

m j=bjβ(y

)σj= ,for|β|=mj,y

∂G, whereσ= (σ,σ, . . . ,σn)∈Rnis a normal to∂G;

() fory∈ ¯,ξRn,νS(ϕ),ϕ(,π),|ξ|+|ν| = letν+

|α|=maα(y)ξα= ;

() for eachy∈,a local BVP in local coordinates corresponding toy

ν+

|α|=m

(y)Dαϑ(y) = ,

Bjϑ=

|β|=mj

bjβ(y)Dβu(y) =hj, j= , , . . . ,m

has a unique solutionϑC(R+)for allh= (h,h, . . . ,hn)∈Rn,and forξRn–

with|ξ|+|ν| = . Then

(a) for allfLp(G),λS(ϕ)and sufficiently large|λ|,the problem()-()has a

unique solutionubelonging toW,m,p(G)and the following coercive uniform

estimate holds:

i=

si|λ|–i∂

iu

∂ix

Lp(G)

+

|β|=m

yuLp(G)CfLp(G);

(19)

Proof LetE=Lp(). Then by virtue of [], the part () of Condition  is satisfied. Con-sider the operatorAacting inLp() defined by

D(A) =Wm,p(;B

ju= ), Au=

|α|≤m

(y)Dαu(y).

Forx, also consider operators inLp() D(Ai) =Wm,p(;Bju= ),

A(x)u=d(x,y)u(y), A(x)u=d(x,y)u(y).

The problem ()-() can be rewritten in the form (), whereu(x) =u(x,·),f(x) =f(x,·) are functions with values inE=Lp(). By virtue of [], the problem

νu(y) +

|α|≤m

(y)yu(y) =f(y),

Bju=

|β|≤mj

bjβ(y)yu(y) = , j= , , . . . ,m

has a unique solution forfLp() and argνS(ϕ),|ν| → ∞. Moreover, in view of [, Theorem .], the operatorAisR-positive inLp(),i.e., Condition  holds. Moreover, it is known that the embeddingWm,p()Lp() is compact (see,e.g., [, Theorem ..]). Then, by using interpolation properties of Sobolev spaces (see,e.g., [, §]), it is clear that the condition () of Theorem  is fulfilled too. Then from Theorems , , the assertions

are obtained.

6 Systems of differential equations with VMO coefficients

Consider the nonlocal BVPs for infinity systems of parameter-differential equations with

principalVMOcoefficients,

sa(x)u()m(x) +

N

j= sb

mj(x)u()j (x) + N

j=

dmj(x)uj(x) +

dm(x) +λ

um(x)

=fm(x), x∈(, ),m= , , . . . ,N, ()

Lku= mk

i= sμiα

kiu()() +βkiu(mi)()

= , k= , , ()

wheresis a positive parameter,a,bmj,dmjare complex valued functions,Nis a finite or

infinite natural number,αkiandβkiare complex numbers,μi=i +p.

Let

d(x) =dm(x)

, dm> , u={um}, Du={dmum}, m= , , . . . ,∞,

lq(D) =

u:ulq(N),ulq(D)=Dulq=

N

m=

|dmum|q

q

<∞

,

References

Related documents

[6], [7], investigated the effects of using RAP in cement concrete by replacing the coarse and fraction of aggregate with the reclaimed asphalt, and found that

biological parameter.90% of the drugs molecules are poorly water soluble and 40% of drugs are present in pharmaceutical industries which needs to improve in

To address the role of Kdm4a in early embryogenesis, we set up different genetic combinations (Fig. 5A): (1) wild-type female mice paired with wild-type or Kdm4a − / − male

The study found that training influenced trade union officials’ perception of their effectiveness in industrial dispute resolution as it gives them basic skills and

e Firing rate histograms showing the effects of the D2R agonist quinpirole (500 μ g/kg, i.v.) on 5-HT neurons recorded in BFP (top) or AAV-D2R s (bottom) injected rats. Control

Reinforcing feminine mitochondrial resili- ence to hSOD1-G93A-linked complex I decay, control- transgenic comparison offered significant differences in complex I function in male

Tang G, Cuzick J, Costantino JP, Dowsett M, Forbes JF, Crager M, Mamounas EP, Shak S, Wolmark N (2011) Risk of recurrence and chemotherapy benefit for patients with

In this paper we introduce a contractive inequality for four fuzzy mappings through a 4-variable generalization of altering distance function and then prove that the two fuzzy