• No results found

Knowledge Objectives (2 of 2) Skills Objectives. Introduction. Process of Elimination (1 of 2) 12/20/2013

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Knowledge Objectives (2 of 2) Skills Objectives. Introduction. Process of Elimination (1 of 2) 12/20/2013"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Fire Cause  Determination

16

Knowledge

 

Objectives

(1 of 2)

• Discuss the use of the process of elimination  when determining fire cause.

• Explain the roles source and form of heat of  ignition play in fire cause.

• Discuss identification of the first fuel ignited.

• Discuss identification of the ignition source.

16

Knowledge

 

Objectives

(2 of 2)

• Discuss the potential oxidizing agents at a fire  scene.

• Explain the use of the scientific method in  cause determination.

16

Skills

 

Objectives

• Identify the first fuel ignited.

• Identify the ignition source.

• Use the scientific method in cause  determination.

16

Introduction

• Fire cause determination identifies: –Ignition sources

–First fuel ignited

–Oxidizing agent

–Human actions

• Also considers:

–Circumstances, conditions, agencies

16

Process

 

of

 

Elimination

(1 of 2)

• Fire investigator:

–Considers all reasonable ignition sources

–Employs scientific method to test hypotheses of 

origin and cause

–Uses evidence gathered during investigative 

(2)

Process

 

of

 

Elimination

(2 of 2)

• There may be a  clearly defined point  of origin but no  identifiable ignition  source.

Inappropriate Use of the Process of 

Elimination

• Simply eliminating “known” potential ignition  sources in area of origin is:

–Insufficient to say fire was intentionally set 

–Also insufficient to say fire was accidental

• There must be evidence of the ignition source  for the hypothesis to be tested.

–Sometimes evidence is not physical.

16

Source and Form of Heat of Ignition

• Source of ignition energy is at or near point of  origin

–Must have sufficient temperature and energy to 

raise fuel to ignition temperature

•This involves generation, transmission, and heating  (thermal inertia).

• Consider interviewing those who knew  contents of room of origin

16

First

 

Fuel

 

Ignited

• Identify the first fuel that sustains combustion  beyond ignition source.

• Consider configuration of fuel:

–With like fuels, one with a higher surface‐to‐mass 

ratio will  require less thermal energy to ignite.

16

Ignition

 

Source

• Was obviously at point of origin when fire  started

–Postfire physical evidence of it may remain.

–It may also have been destroyed or removed.

• Ignition source for ignitable vapors can be 

16

Oxidizing

 

Agent

• Is generally just the oxygen in the air

• Fire intensity can be enhanced by the addition  of other oxidants.

–e.g., medical oxygen cylinders, pool sanitizers

(3)

Ignition

 

Sequence

• Events that brought  ignition source and  fuel together

–Establishes cause and 

responsibility

The Scientific Method in Cause 

Determination

(1 of 2) • Determining cause follows the accurate 

identification of origin.

• Data must be collected and analyzed.

• Cause hypotheses can then be developed and  tested for each individual heat source.

16

The Scientific Method in Cause 

Determination

(2 of 2)

• Appropriate way to apply scientific method is  to attempt to disproveeach hypothesis

• Hypotheses that cannot be disproved may be  possible or probable.

16

Data

 

Collection

• Essential data:

–Identification of fuels (fuel analysis)

–Potential ignition sources (ignition source analysis)

–Unusual oxidants in area of origin

• Information from persons with knowledge of  the area can be helpful.

• Prefire photographs can also be useful.

16

Data

 

Analysis

(1 of 5)

• Data analysis can be done once all potential  initial fuels, ignition sources, oxidants, and  relevant circumstances have been identified.

• Investigator must not jump to conclusions

16

Data

 

Analysis

(2 of 5)

• Separate hypothesis must be tested for each  fuel/ignition source/oxidant combination

Ignition sequencemust be identified

–Ignition source can sometimes be logically inferred 

(4)

Data

 

Analysis

(3 of 5)

• Certain evidence supports the inference of a  reliable ignition sequence:

–Diffuse fuel ignitions

–Multiple origins

–Trailers

–Witnessed ignitions

–Presence of ignitable liquids

Data

 

Analysis

(4 of 5)

• Factors to consider:

–How and when initial fuel came to origin 

–How and when oxidant came to be present

–How and when competent ignition source came to 

be present

–How and when competent ignition source 

transferred heat to initial fuel

16

Data

 

Analysis

(5 of 5)

• Factors to consider (cont’d):

–What acts or omissions brought together the fuel, 

oxidizer, and ignition source.

–How initial fuel ignited subsequent fuels to result 

in fire spread

16

Cause

 

Hypotheses

• Using scientific method, investigator forms  opinions based on fire cause hypothesis

• Investigator assigns a level of certainty: –Probable—more likely true than not

–Possible—feasible but not probable

• Do not confuse these terms with the term  “probable cause” used in criminal  investigations.

16

Summary

(1 of 4)

• In any investigation of a fire cause, the  investigator will need to consider all  reasonable ignition sources and use the  scientific method to test his or her application  to the investigation at hand.

16

Summary

(2 of 4)

• The source of the ignition energy will be at or  near the point of origin.

• Identification of the first fuel ignited is an  important part of the hypothesis testing.

(5)

Summary

(3 of 4)

• The investigator should identify the ignition  sequence or the events that brought the  ignition source and the fuel together, thus  establishing the fire cause and responsibility.

Summary

(4 of 4)

• The investigator may establish one of two  levels of certainty based on his or her  confidence in the data collected.

–Probable

References

Related documents

We nd that if individuals dier in initial wealth and if commodity taxes can be evaded at a uniform cost, preferences have to be weakly separable between consumption and labor

Based on the above survey results from selected participants from small sites, a total of 73.8% out of a total of 528 participants either disagreed or strongly disagreed with

For the Fall 2004 class, we used Spearman rank order correlations to investigate relationships of self-perceived programming confidence, work ethic, and procrastination

In view of the present satisfactory level of computerisation in commercial bank branches, it is proposed that, ‘‘payment of interest on savings bank accounts by scheduled

- Habitat for Humanity International – Provided computer support for the direct mail, telemarketing, major donor, matching gift, and special event fundraising programs -

(a) in respect of any of the securities of the responsible issuer that the person or company subsequently disposed of on or before the 10th trading day after the public correction

Control << ButtonBase >> Button CheckBox RadioButton DataGridView DataGrid << TextBoxBase >> TextBox RichTextBox GroupBox PictureBox StatusBar ToolBar TreeView

FC (Fibre Channel Arbitrated Loop) - SPS (Stand by Power Supply) - SLC (Single-Level Cell) - DDR SDRAM (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory).. 9